Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    March 20, 2015 11:00am-11:31am PDT

11:00 am
tely provide his name and star number upon request and admonishment and retraining and one involved an officer who removed a complainant's keys and we found the evidence didn't support the officers limited authority to enter the truck and that concludes my report. >> chief, is there anything that you want to say about that? thank you director hicks. >> oh you are welcome. >> the owner believed that the officer turned off the truck and ran down the block to teach him a lesson and not leave his car running. he didn't want to leave the car running and have
11:01 am
someone steal the truck and then he would be responsible because he knew the car was running so the director and i talked that that it could have gone either way so she was understanding. >> got it. thank you director hicks. >> your welcome. >> any reports or recent activities for director hicks? >> your welcome. >> inspector, please call the next line item. >> 5 c commissioner's report and discussion with the controller's office regarding district boundary assessment report. >> yes i'll start with my report. since it's been a month since we were here the format of our meetings hasn't been such that we can update the community on what we've been doing. . obviously we
11:02 am
celebrated black history month in february and excited to have congress john lewis come to san francisco and even more significant given the the anniversary of bloody sunday and the attempted march from selma to montgomery and i think that's important to remember at this time the history of law enforcement's role in some real low moments for this country and so i think as we folks around this table and i think who care about san francisco are really thinking about the past forward and i think february certainly gave me a chance to pause and acknowledge the history as we find a path together forward to making san francisco as great of a city as it a city as it can be. on february 23rd i took up the
11:03 am
invitation of green she's a project housing resident who invited members of the police commission to come and walk up potrero to see what's happening there. it was wonderful i would like to give a compliment to officer bran don and she really highlighted their ability to handle situations and diffuse situations and build relationships with communities and get increased cooperation and that was a wonderful opportunity to get out from behind this forum and out with her and i want to compliment the officers for justice they did a wonderful women's trail blazer event and i was pleased to represent this commission and it was a celebration of of the contribution of many woman particularly women of color and it was to benefit kids and that was a great night. we did have
11:04 am
a town hall for the officer involved shooting in the mission on march on march 2nd and on march 2nd and i attended that with commissioner dejes u.s. and they shared the information known at that time and certainly a lot of feedback from members of the community and i did go on a ride along in the mission that week and kind of see for myself and i was paired with 2 extraordinary officers. they have been with the department 2 years and i'm interested in how people come to this department one came from the private sector and one was a teacher so that says a lot about the recruitment efforts to think outside the box and folks i was very impressed at the number of ways over the evening that they diffused situations and proud of their ability to do that and i want to thank them. i also
11:05 am
did learn from an officer that some of them regularly watch the police commission which i think -- i only joke my mother watches it . i did learn an officer said i watch it on wednesdays and i care about the department and i want to see the direction of the department and that was instructive to me and march 6th there was a lateral graduation ten lateral officers joined this department and seemed very eager and excited to join the department and i will say a number of issues came up at the meetings that were helpful and constructive and we'll schedule those in the weeks and months to come but we're going to talk about redistricting in terms of where the boundaries are and the issues that came up as we go forward and the last and final thing i want to share is that we have a twitter account
11:06 am
scomb account and i see excitement in the audience and i want we're at sfpd commission on twitter and someone congratulated us. we're going to be putting out agendas and i wish the camera was on him right now. [laughter] the agenda and information reports there's certainly one thing many lessons from a lot of this and transparency is really important and we're going to be sharing what what we can on twitter and facebook so colleagues reports from all of you. >> dejes u.s. commission. >> i did a march a march 2nd community meeting in the mission regarding the officer
11:07 am
involved shooting and i have to say it was disturbing the amount of mistrust that the community has for the department and angry and not only at the ois i saw a lot of angry coming through about evictions in the mission district about the fires in the mission district about the displacement as well as law enforcement. and i haven't seen the president's report. i downloaded it i'm going to read it i did read the ferguson report and other articles keep coming out about community policing and stuff like that but one thing everyone is stressing is capturing data certain areas of data i believe we capture a lot of data but i'd like to to analyze perhaps we should put a committee what data are they capturing and what data do they recommend we capture? and how
11:08 am
to analyze that data because i think when we go to these meetings if we have a lot of this information, we can share it number 1 and number 2 is looking at raw data can also tell us what proportion of of of the racial make up of arrests convictions and officer involved shootings, whatever data we're going to gather -- what the age groups are etc. etc. and it may show us some areas where we can have improvement or areas for fertile discussion and the ferguson report is showing a certain amount of data showing 63 percent of of the population is african-american but 99 percent of the citations are african-americans so good to have that data and analyze it and looking at it to see if
11:09 am
we have room for improvement whether we're having a disproportionate impact in the community and i'm putting it out there and perhaps you might want to think about putting a a committee together to look at what is the data we have and how do we start capturing and analyzing it. >> i agree and i appreciate that commissioner. can you by the next meeting give us the data we have and maybe start that conversation. >> yes in fact we spoke to how we collect data today at at the conference and i'm happy to make a presentation and if you think there's other things we should we should be collecting as well i'm happy to do that in fact the woman that's the deputy attorney general actually asked me to fax our data to her so i'll get that presentation. >> great and i hear what you are saying, too there's other experts that can help us because we want to identify the issues and solve those issues.
11:10 am
>> and if we even have an issue. >> right exactly. commissioner hwang. >> i want to commend you i don't know how you attended all of those events and hold down your day job. last month i participated in an outreach session at tenderloin station. we started a monthly or quarterly forum to limited english speaking communities and he targeted the asian community in the tenderloin had fifty or sixty seniors come out . it was very well received by the audience there. i also had invitations to meet with supervisors eric mar and jane kim separately both of who expressed a lot of issues in the language issues that have
11:11 am
been raised here at the commission and i assured them that we would take the time at the commission to look at those issues. >> great. >> thank thank you commissioner and there's a lot of thanks that go to president loftus and my mother mother but i did take my daughter so thanks to those folks in case they are watching at home. >> . >> the family violence council in san francisco has released its latest report on family violence and i'm going to send the the link to all of you so you can have it because it gives us a good picture of what happens in the city including
11:12 am
all government agencies that handle domestic violence cases in san francisco. the other piece was going to the california partnership against domestic violence lobby day in sacramento where we looked at the possibility of somebody doing audits on failure to protect cases that those are the cases that come out of cps potentially where the victim loses custody of her kids because she has been basically in a situation where she has failed to protect her children however there's very little data about that so we have requested newly elected assembly member 2 to request a state audit to see how often these cases happen and why they happen so those are two things that i just wanted to go through. thanks.
11:13 am
>> thank you commissioner. anything further from my colleagues on commission reports? >> please call the next line item. >> district boundary assessment report. >> colleagues, we have been in the map world, redistricting world for 90 days and we'll orient you to where we are in this process. by way of history we got the proposed map which was the result of a year long data driven process from the department on what the proposed map would be. took public comment through a series of group individual meetings and received e-mails it's really actually i'll say incredibly comforting how much
11:14 am
people pay attention to these issues so we had a meeting in the tenderloin on on january 28th northern station february 11th and jones methodist church and most recently last week bayview southeast facility commission and i've shared my notes. these were all meetings we were all jointly at with the controller's office to give them a starting point. so we're going to hear from the controller about what i believe and what they believe are the starting points some of the ideas that came from community members have evolved through the conversation and so i think we'll hear about that too. a community member suggested going to polk and maybe look at
11:15 am
going all the way to van ness and polk and larkin are big areas for some types of illegal activities so we'll hear now from the controller of what we believe the proposed changes are and this is an opportunity for all of us to go back through your notes check to see if there's anything missing here and an opportunity to consider the data when we look at what final map we're going to adopt because now we have the community perspective and want to integrate that and make sure we take the community ideas, understand what the data is and come up with something that makes the most sense so feel free to add anything you feel might be missing so i'll go to the controller's office. >> thank you president loftus once again good evening and
11:16 am
members of the public my name is randy maclure e. we have a third party expert consultant based out of massachusetts who has been along for the ride along the way public safety strategies group and we want to have them come back at the final stage to address some of these data issues and questions that you that you may have before making final decisions and it tonight wanted to to go briefly through where we are as president loftus said and the objective is to try to come to some agreement to take it back to our consultant in terms of what the line changes that the commission would like to
11:17 am
see us run the data for keep in mind every individual line change on its own in a vacuum is not difficult to make but once you start making multiple line changes in unison around the city it gets increasingly complex and the data becomes more difficult because there's more iterations and options to consider and that will be something we continue to ask with every additional question and sort of request it may require more time and analysis on the consultant's side. >> and so just briefly, again, for the folks who may not have been at the previous meetings, we took a year-long look at the current lines and we're required every 10 years by the board of supervisors to do a redistricting analysis and ask a working group of command staff at the pd to consider the following objectives in
11:18 am
their analysis which which is achieving greater workload. >> we've mentioned at previous meetings a great number of data points and the working group certainly considered many, if not all of them throughout the process they spent many hours in the rooms together and worked with our consultant and there are five data points however that ultimately ended up in the data cube cad for 5 years and cable which are incident data for 5 years and population from 20 ten
11:19 am
consensus. through the various public meetings over the the last 90 days we tried our best to track what some of some of the community members had put forth as idea for line changes based on the proposal presented in december and came up with 7 different options for the commission to consider and certainly this is all proposed. it can be talked about and discussed here today in addition to finalized before we take to our consultant but again, keeping in a sense of time and cost with our consultant we definitely want to make sure we give them one specific ask in terms of the data request. what . what you see in front of you here on this slide is the blue lines on
11:20 am
this map are the proposed district boundaries presented in december and the red lines the current district boundaries and shaded those 7 areas i mentioned previously where the community or others have provided input along the way during the 90-day public comment period in terms of changes they were interested in seeing and so we're going to drill down into that a little bit on the next slide where you can see the tenderloin northern and central meet on this map and if you take a look at the at the left side of the screen, there's an orange area and kind of underneath that is a bluish area the bluish area represents a move in in the current proposed line excuse me to include a section between larkin and polk and so you see on the map there it cuts over from geary on the north side
11:21 am
goes down polk and can you cuts back just where civic is at mcallister and a second involved geary street itself and you can see on the map the red northern boundary of the tenderloin district. this proposal was to include both sides of geary in the tenderloin district and the third one is the orange shaded area again dealing with the west side of the tenderloin district and further to van ness all the way south which would include city hall and all the way down to where van ness meets market street is the third option that we've heard. >> i think the chief wants to say something and i do too. >> i don't recall there was ever an option where city
11:22 am
center got taken and i thought the blue area underneath underneath there that blue area would just go to van ness with mcallister being the southern border i don't think the tenderloin residents ever wanted civic center. >> correct. >> civic center is in the orange area. >> do you see where the arrow is now? that arrow would just go to van ness and the dividing line -- >> i have including the arteries to polk and eddie and farrell street larkin up to polk. >> yeah that is correct. this is why we do this but that's too broad of an area. it would go to mcallister -- that was
11:23 am
the request. >> absolutely. >> i want to stop there. we had a really robust meeting in the tenderloin and the thrust behind it there was a concern about the border on larkin street and the activity there and certain gangs and people benefitting from that being a border street and you are going to talk about the mall now? west field mall. >> correct. the green shaded area represents market street between market street and third to fifth street between market and mission, which is the location of the west field mall and obviously there was discussion as president loftus mentions quite a bit particularly at the tenderloin meeting we had in january about what resources and allocation on that one. one thing we should note there's a little red dot to the left of that green area we noted that. it doesn't come up as much but it
11:24 am
was noted as a potential issue with the new shopping center being located there. >> so the request was that the west field shopping mall not be in the tenderloin and community driven concerns where they felt we were expanding but not beyond the ability of those officers to respond. >> the yellow line market street at the southern border, that's the tenderloin correct? >> right here? >> there that yellow line. go to your right. yeah right there that line right there. that's tenderloin, right? >> the proposed tenderloin. >> to van ness right? >> this is the proposed. that's currently proposed.
11:25 am
>> that represents sort of the 4 public feedback options that we heard and really the conscious the the concentration of many of the requests. moving to the next slide two other options came up through public feedback the first is the yellow area which represents a move south of the southern district to to mariposa a couple of blocks south we heard a lot of feedback on that option and and related to the homeless encampments underneath the 101 and whether that particular area especially where the the 101 and the spur meet at the north end whether that would stay with the mission district or whether it would go to the
11:26 am
southern or the bayview. >> other questions about that? again, this is the time to discuss and get it all -- >> did portrero want the purple part or not? >> so the yellow part seemed to be there was a lot of consensus and the purple part wasn't gag to to be that big so we'll have to go back and ask them i believe they just wanted it to be part of the bayview. so that one we'll have to talk to -- i can't -- i could figure it out but i just can't see it. >> they didn't want it to go all
11:27 am
the way to potrero i thought they wanted it to go to utah. >> these are the members from the potrero hill area and that's why we're here again to make sure that we're all on the same page. to keep that section in the bayview as opposed to being at mission station. >> i think it was a very very small area like just mariposa -- it's it's really only like a couple of blocks. the very bottom right-hand corner of that map -- utah and mariposa which would adjoin the bayview district. >> putting a cross on mariposa okay. >> just taking it to utah.
11:28 am
>> only as far west as utah? >> yes, it's literally only 1 block. >> i guessed right. that's what i heard at the last community meeting. >> i'm just going to read the letter we did get a letter to confirm from jr, eppler the area boundeded by highway 101, potrero and 16th street. as evidence by several commentators at the meeting -- i think the issue in this letter which i know you used -- the discussion is pretty broad around 16th and 18th and potrero and that's a good catch we want to to make sure we get
11:29 am
that right. this area is part of the hill it says except for its policing so they really want to be part of bayview station which, i think is a testament. chief is going off script now and he's approached the television. >> so you need to come back to your microphone because i think you probably shared some pearls of wisdom that could not be heard. >> per the letter the yellow line would just continue straight across that's what they are talking about. i don't know how you would make that part of the bayview so we'll leave that to the consultant. >> any other questions on this data request? it seems that there's some narrowing that we have to do there and maybe follow up with the president
11:30 am
and captain o'sullivan go ahead. >> and so moving to the last area that we heard come up, would impact the park and the richmond districts and as you can see the blue line again this was the proposed cuts across on geary to the north and south on masonic and one of the ideas that we heard was to move in a yellow -- excuse me, the gray box into the park district as well and so it would continue further west on geary and then south on stanyon. the gray box to the left would be added to park. >> and so this was an e-mail that we received from tim hickey