have, however, i'm certain the discipline and springs we'll provide condition to those continue to serve the agency over the last couple of years we've had improvement not video system and the evaluating assessment made will several recommendations we anticipate be able to pay for with a u.s. grant from the state this includes additional intrusion protection and surveillance so what is a seat protection we're in line with the sfmta to secure the assets patrons and staff i welcome our questions. >> we have can you quintessential revisit the history of what happened the first time the 3wid happened.

>> how we got here today. >> i'm going to ask my colleague mr. chair. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm the manager of the mta so the history we issued a request for invitation for bid last year being the low bidder in norwalk the involved andrew at this point we came to this board as well as the supervisors recommended approval of the contract to andrew international there were issues relayed to the bid pricing that andrew simpleminded they felt that the prirz was not positions essentially under bid there was allegations to other bidder that

may have increased the wage rates at the end so at the time tests full board meeting surrounding international pulled out of the bid allegations will be the wage increases we did an imperial revenue if the time of the r f b was issued we didn't find any descriptions only anywhere things nothing major so when andrew pulled out we issued a request for a proposal went to the selection process and 5ur7bdz scored the highest we entered into negotiations with 5ur7b8dz at that time the pricing structure was different we asked for an overhead rate

essentially whatever they got the benefits would add the overhead and profit rate to it when we started negotiations 5u7b8dzandrews said they had a profit and asked their proposal overhead and profit rate was 45 percent in the proposal to ask for apple increase of 349 percent we asked for a lower rate than proposed we negotiated in good faith and didn't reach an agreement we sent them a letter we were going to terminate the negotiations so we negotiated in good faith they included the provisions in their

rates and here we are requesting approval. >> what's their overhead and profit rate. >> the proposed rate 2 and a half percent over the 6 year term. >> okay. all right. no other questions mr. rose can we go to your report please. yes mr. chair and supervisor tang as sheen no table 2 on page 15 of our report based on the sfmta capitol hill puncture projections they'll pay $34 million plus for the armed services and 9 hundred 56 hours of urban armed services over the full 6 year contract period the budget projection or so of 390 millions plus are 5 thousand more not to exceed in the amount

of $38 million plus sfmta will make adjustments to remain within the not to exceed proposed contract. >> on page 17th century of our report we show a exchanger of tables two and three under the proposed initial contract cypress security will provide a reduction in service hours a 7.1 percent reductions and 76 unarmed service hours that's a steno percentage reduction compared to the last year prior contract we state an page 16 of our report that the sfmta advise that the proposed security hours is driven brirm by the department for wages as the

department has testified and that's required by ordinance 26014 of board of supervisors and also the sfmta advise as a stated in today's meeting with the proper sprirngs the unarmed services should be adequate to address the needs our recommendation on page 16 we recommend you amend the proposed resolution to include and not to exceed 499 plus for the first 3 years with 3, one year options at sole discretion we've made the recommendation to be consistent with the resolutions that have been approved by the board of supervisors and recommend you approve it as

amended. >> thank you very much mr. rose. >> supervisor katie tang. >> i apologize if i didn't hear this i wanted to confirm our okay with the budget analyst recommendations okay. at this time i'll make a represents to approve it as stated and after that approve the flying i'm sorry reds with a with a positive recommendation to the phone number. >> we have a motion on the floor first we'll open up for public comment anybody wish to comment on item 6 okay seeing none, public comment is closed we have a motion by supervisor tang we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 7. >> ordinance appropriately the appropriately 11 point plus million dollars for the construction of the open spaces in the rec and park department

for the fiscal year 2014-2015. >> okey-dokey we have the rec and park department don't see them call 8 and 9 together and the contract management support services for the san francisco international airport terminal one not to exceed $29 million with a appropriation of 6 years for board approval and the airport contract management support serviced for trernl one project not to exceed $23 million to commence board approval. >> okay thanks we have ms. wiener here. >> good morning supervisor farrell and supervisor tang kathy wagner with the san francisco international airport for the airport to enter into

two contract with the airport terminal one renovation project as you recall from previous items before the board the airport is under taking a $2.4 billion project to build terminal one as part of our capital plan term one was built in the early 1960s and needs to be updated to accommodate our passengers what fully completed in 20/20 our terminal one will provide passenger circulations to 24 gates and new passenger loading bridges and new commemoration as well as a new terminal central area that approves the escape it on the security tech point and the handling system and baggage claim area with a new lane that

connects to train and the central park and garage scope of work for both the contract to provide contract management support services in support of the terminal one and the boarding area project that includes the design management services and project control services and costs and scheduling management and construction management services the airport issued a single proposal for the selection of those contracts 5 proposals were received and reviewed by the airport and a panel based on the scores of the proposals it was determined that a e coming and cooper was the highest ranked proposal and that the t one cube team was the second highest ranked proposer

and the t one cube was offend the new boarding area airport staff negotiated the scope and terms and conditions of the contract they anticipated not to exceed in duration for each contract is $23 million for the organization e come with the venture with a duration of 5 years for the renovation contract and $29 million for the t one cube jointly venture with the durable of 6 years for the b project budget analyst recommendations an amendment to the contract for the fund to more specifically toy to project areas the airport it in agreement and if approved i will get amended copies for the board. >> you've been here from the

budget committee why not go to your report mr. rose and questions if needed. >> yes. mr. chairman and supervisor tang regarding item 8 as show that in table 3 open page 31 of our report the contract budget with t could you be in the first year is $249 million plus over the 6 years is $29 million plus on page 35 of our report we note as indicated that all the airport around the budget for the continuance to have the cost contract between t one cubed and the airport didn't specify those funds so our recommendations on the bottom of page 35 amend the specifications the 10 year cap with the 35 percent of other 4r0ush8 costs regarding item 9

on page excuse me. on page 40 of our report as shown in table 3 the contract budget a $340 million plus over the 5 year contract is $22 million plus again, the same issue where the owners contingency and the recommendations on the bottom of page 40 we recommend you amend the proposed resolution and the cap of 5 percent on the other direct costs we recommend you adapt the recommendation. >> no questions we'll communication anyone wish to

comment on items 8 or 9 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so we have both items we'll take them separately but why not run them separately slide will 9 our budget analysts made a recommendation. >> so item 8 i'm sorry we'll take item 8 first do i have a recommendation. >> okay we'll take that without objection. and similar motion for item 9. >> item 9 to amend as harvey rose recommendations and approve the flying sent to the full board with with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thanks very much and see those amendments contract madam clerk go to item 12. >> the resolution recognizing the thorgs of the public comment is closed. to accept a grant in the amount

for substance abuse for the peer support project for the 2014-2015 we have waving directly costs. >> good morning supervisor farrell and supervisor tang we're requesting the board authorize the public health to accept the pier program through the mental health services administration this program will provide much needed peer support to participants in 3 of the collaborative courts program the veterans and the drug and behavorial health court the folks will be dual diagnosed with substance abuse and bringing in peers to work with

the inmates and we're excited about this program. >> thanks very much if no questions we'll open up for public comment we don't have a budget analyst report anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> can i have a motion to send this item forward we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 13. >> resolution authorizing the probation department for the guaranteeing the program by the state and community corrections. >> hi, i'm karen shane from the adults probation department this essentially what is happened in january the adult probation department submitted a proposal to the newly corrections a portion the proposal of the board was requirement that we

come to our board of supervisors authorizing the grant proposal at this point the grant proposal has been conditionally approved we're here from the school board in april so the grant itself is to support transitional aged youth parents both young would women with are housed here in san francisco and the giving up of a new program for young men. >> great thanks for being here so supervisor tang. >> just a quick questions are there any matching fund. >> no. >> we have no budget analyst report so we'll open up for public comment seen none, public comment is closed. on item 13. >> through the chair i'd like to make a motion to forward this to the full board open up for public comment and madam clerk

any other business before this committee? >> mr. chair there's another amendment. >> we have an amendment for the open spaces in rec and park department for a fiscal year 2014-2015. >> okay. so we don't have our department supervisor tang. >> i mean, i look at the item i'm sure we can go to harvey rose report i don't have questions i know that rec and park tend to bring this report out of an abundance of caution and need for transparent especially by the board when there are changes to the funding i know it is more of a cash flow issue there are no projects are shortchanged i'm okay with running this through without a rec and park department presentation.

>> mr. rose i've heard from a colleague yesterday they had questions about this and not heard a resolution before a back. >> why not to your report. >> mr. chair and supervisor tang on page 19 the proposed anticipation of $11 million 070 thousand plus for the rec and park department projects none of those budget our those projects have been eliminated indicate a detailed status of each project that are appropriated as listed in the attachment that binges open page 21 we recommend you approve the proposed ordinance. >> thank you, mr. rose why not open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on item 7 seen none, public comment is closed.

so again, if you feel strongly i'll be happy to push it forward about it would be great to have rec and park department to have here and the commissioners have questions so your call. >> through the chair i'm fine with continuing it for a week. >> we'll have a motion to continue it for wore week we'll take that without objection. madam clerk now any other business before us. >> no, mr. chair as registered voter

in san francisco before each election you receive a voter information pamphlet in the mail it has the digest for each local proposition on the ballot how does a context sometimes proposition get semido if i had. >> inning. >> i don't know the specific process. >> it's done by a committee a ballot tim simplification. >> 3 steps the city attorney's office create a working digest the ballot committee holds public meats and creates final

digest the simplified is published in the guide let's look at how this work after a proposition has been approved the sxhoofz drafts a city digest each digest we prepare has a couple of different saektsz the first is the way it is now provides an overview of the state of the law before the measure goes into effect addressed the second section is the material turn of the measure and finally at the bottom there are two sections one is called a yes vote and no vote means and if prep those we try to tell me the voters if the measure passes are not passed uses the city attorney's office delivered it is to the 5 member committee created in 192376 the members

are nominated business the leak of women voters two members are appointed by itself may and 2 by the board of supervisors the committee holds public meetings for two weeks before each election arrest you the chairman has the sterilized ability to direct the meeting and lead the discussion. >> there's no politics involved at all because we're all journalist or people that worked with communications that has our goal the free right to communication without agenda or boys or political involvements all. >> before the commission meets each member reviews the digest along with the material. >> we get the protective technicalities and the actual

yaurgd background and letters from different departments and from the advocates and perpetrate for the meeting sometimes for and 5 days in japs sometimes someone will sigh did you understand it no one understand those bond measures of one hundred and one hundred owe 25 packages down to three or four had found words. >> amendments and the general obligation bond members it is marred to explain what a general obligation bond is. >> wow it gets interesting sometimes. >> we'll talk about it but we talk about it in session we don't talk about it before we get here. >> the committee acceptance the city attorney's draft or edit it. >> the reason we rewrite the city attorney's digest is because it oftentimes in more

legalize than the voters see understand we're quick to ask questions we don't is this is the way it's going to be we come in as journalist questioning exactly which that is to put out into the digest exactly what the legislation means. >> the committee may hear from drafrt of the digests and they consultant with the committee educational specialist to make sure if meets the requirement to be written as closed those as possible to the eight grade level. >> we say is that really an eight grader words sometimes yes and sometimes grab the addicts and find substitute and it requires the city to maintain all the golden gate park. >> during the editing of the digest it's displayed on large

monitor. >> there's no mystery of what the public sees. >> they hear outline your discussions they know what we're thinking and after the committee makes the changes the proceedings radio on inform the public for comment. >> poach have a right to voice their opinions in democracy people come before us are dead serious depending on obtain on the side and their passion is strong. >> july 4th with 9 committee there's a lot of airmentd argument pro and con and well, you could take out the voter initiative. >> i want to address someone that was mentioned. >> i take exception to the previous comment. >> 0 hopes 0 provisions thank you. >> after public comment the committee discussed all the points in an open session.

>> sometimes, we change our draft sometimes, we literally tear our draft apart. >> after the possible changes made the committee takes a final vote to adapt the digest. >> i move we adapt the measure. >> at least 3 members must agree. >> all in favor, say i. >> the public hearsay twenty-four hours hours for the submission of a reconsideration to the department of elections. >> the following week the committee meets publicly to discuss the appeals and take public comment and decided wloovr whether or not to adapt the final digest. >> what we really want is for the voter to think for themselves read what we say and read for themselves and look and make up their own mind we're in their corner ready to fight for them

and the administrations fight often it didn't matter your obligation is to the voter we want them to be able to look at it and understand it. >> learn marrow missouri bhr the committee at sf election.org before every election find a ballot simplification in the ballot it is rankle 1 english chinese spanish and filipino it is mailed to all voter and can be found at sf election.org. >> it seems like everyone in san

francisco is talking about housing san francisco housing prizes are among the highest it tops anyone million dollars and rent rise unfortunately, this is not the first time housing has been in the news thought california the cost of a home has made headline the medium prices for a house in the the $207,000 in california it is more than twice that amount and the laura u bay area is higher it's more than doubled the states so while more than half of the americans can afford the medium fewer in california and quarter in the bayer and now fewer than a 6th of san franciscans can afford it so why it housing in san francisco so go cheven condition tharz the

obviously a high demand to live here the city is known for cultural diversities that attacks new residents and the credible opportunity our city diverse and will daytime committee grows jobs as a result we estimate the number of jobs is at ann an all-time 0 hive of 6 hundred thousand in the 80 the population was 6 hundred and 75 thousand now, it's grown steadily and quickly the recent estimate is 8 hundred and 40 thousand the highest in the city's history and it's not only san francisco it is greek the bay area has $2 million for residents and jobs then in the 80 and the growth is expected to continue by the year