there is a school at the north side of the valley i'm to refer to it as a high contact sport to make sure we implement the project smoothly. >> so the $686 million is for the remaining project. >> that's correct. >> that didn't account for the other projects. >> that's correct. >> we have a full-time community person on the project site they will wound down their time as the project you know gets towards the end that person helps poem be informed about blasting that be took place and notice to the community she fields calls and gets a lot of calls to make sure that people understand when the blast is going to occur and making sure they're not on hiking trails and

so there is a lot of engagement on a daily basis. >> okay. i mean i definitely understand the level of outreach it is high to me but i'll move on i want to clarify the other direct charges the $1.4 million. >> the other direct charges are expenses that are not staff time such a vehicles and project on a steep terrain required for the management team and the team pays for part of that those are as a result of being there and laboratory costs for materials that are needed for the construction management team all of those expenditures have unknown staff time. >> thank you.

>> thank you supervisor tang seeing no other questions open up for public comment would anybody in the public like to comment on item number 4 okay seeing none, public comment is closed supervisor tang. >> all right. well i will make a motion to forward out the resolution with a positive recommendations to the full board. >> we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk can you please call item 5 and resolution authorizing the general manager of the san francisco public utilities commission to execute the matter inform europeans project not to exceed of $19.5 million. >> welcome back. >> good morning, supervisors dan the water program director those two item 5 which is the

construction management services with hatch mcdonald with the tunnel project this project is actually much closer to completion there than the cal versus project we have ground water entrugs and gas conditions and geowill logic conditions that have an extension foot project schedule and other things that are required that occurred last fall two sections of land that bubbled it was discovered r0u9 that needed to be repaired we've fully rerouted the whole tunnel portions of the tunnel are in service the construction continues to finish up both end of the tunnel and 96 percent completed and there is work to do as well we anticipate

filing a completion actually completion this fall and final by the end of the year we have services that are needed to continue the construction management final close out for the additional quality sticks or inspection this is a photo of recent complete tunnel the last activity of the motor lynn machine there inside the tunnel that the motor lynn since it protects the tunnel lynn from co-sponsor recognize and that was the last operations for you putting this tomb into service on february 27th it is safer today because this instructional u tunnel provides critical services for the oracle duty to deliver the liability for 2 point i6r million people in the

bay area so this action approves the amount for hatch mcdonald to increase the amount not to exceed $19.5 million and expend it by one year for a total of seven years this will allow us to complete this critical project as well i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> okay. thank you why don't we go mr. rose to our report and to questions. >> yes. mr. chair on page 8 the total revised budget for the tunnel is $30,900,000 plus it includes the construction management contract for $17.5 million and the requested $2 million for a total not to exceed $19.5 million and the new

urban tunnel expenditures are $314,000 plus and again, that's in tackle one on page 8 of our report and table 4 open page 9 of our report summarizes the increases of $2 million to the hatch mcdonald contract we recommend you, you approve it. >> thank you, mr. rose any questions for the commissioners public comment is closed. seeing none, public comment is closed 0 so we have a recommendation to approve the resolution. >> all right. to the chair i will make a motion to forward out the resolution with a positive recommendation to the full board. >> we'll take that without objection. >> item 6. >> resolution approving the

contract security to provide armed security services approximately $38.4 million for a term of 3 years. >> thank you good morning supervisor farrell and supervisor tang on behalf of the agency we're here to get an approval of armed and urban armed security services thirty thousand plus hours for the protection of revenue saddles and collection for event and one hundred and 59 hours of unarmed services unanimously for the protection of buses for a significant deployment and the workload and staffing the 24/7 transportation center maintaining the video as an program and for the safety of

the patrons and staff supporting supervisor breed anti graffiti with the patrol for the uploading for the self-police department and 6 percent to check for compliance with the americans with disabilities act and all security officers currently deploy at sfmta for the security will be paid the prevailing wage we wanted to address jufshlg concerns in the armed areas the result that some of the services is are no longer necessary as a more streamlined revenue collection process is in place that requires fewer personnel in the unarmed area certainly not described that situation as ideal, however

given our budgetary concerns it is a decision we have to make to pay for the serviced we have, however, i'm certain the discipline and springs we'll provide condition to those continue to serve the agency over the last couple of years we've had improvement not video system and the evaluating assessment made will several recommendations we anticipate be able to pay for with a u.s. grant from the state this includes additional intrusion protection and surveillance so what is a seat protection we're in line with the sfmta to secure the assets patrons and staff i welcome our questions. >> we have can you

quintessential revisit the history of what happened the first time the 3wid happened. >> how we got here today. >> i'm going to ask my colleague mr. chair. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm the manager of the mta so the history we issued a request for invitation for bid last year being the low bidder in norwalk the involved andrew at this point we came to this board as well as the supervisors recommended approval of the contract to andrew international there were issues relayed to the bid pricing that andrew simpleminded they felt that the

prirz was not positions essentially under bid there was allegations to other bidder that may have increased the wage rates at the end so at the time tests full board meeting surrounding international pulled out of the bid allegations will be the wage increases we did an imperial revenue if the time of the r f b was issued we didn't find any descriptions only anywhere things nothing major so when andrew pulled out we issued a request for a proposal went to the selection process and 5ur7bdz scored the highest we entered into negotiations with

5ur7b8dz at that time the pricing structure was different we asked for an overhead rate essentially whatever they got the benefits would add the overhead and profit rate to it when we started negotiations 5u7b8dzandrews said they had a profit and asked their proposal overhead and profit rate was 45 percent in the proposal to ask for apple increase of 349 percent we asked for a lower rate than proposed we negotiated in good faith and didn't reach an agreement we sent them a letter we were going to terminate the negotiations so

we negotiated in good faith they included the provisions in their rates and here we are requesting approval. >> what's their overhead and profit rate. >> the proposed rate 2 and a half percent over the 6 year term. >> okay. all right. no other questions mr. rose can we go to your report please. yes mr. chair and supervisor tang as sheen no table 2 on page 15 of our report based on the sfmta capitol hill puncture projections they'll pay $34 million plus for the armed services and 9 hundred 56 hours of urban armed services over the full 6 year contract period the

budget projection or so of 390 millions plus are 5 thousand more not to exceed in the amount of $38 million plus sfmta will make adjustments to remain within the not to exceed proposed contract. >> on page 17th century of our report we show a exchanger of tables two and three under the proposed initial contract cypress security will provide a reduction in service hours a 7.1 percent reductions and 76 unarmed service hours that's a steno percentage reduction compared to the last year prior contract we state an page 16 of our report that the sfmta advise

that the proposed security hours is driven brirm by the department for wages as the department has testified and that's required by ordinance 26014 of board of supervisors and also the sfmta advise as a stated in today's meeting with the proper sprirngs the unarmed services should be adequate to address the needs our recommendation on page 16 we recommend you amend the proposed resolution to include and not to exceed 499 plus for the first 3 years with 3, one year options at sole discretion we've made the recommendation to be consistent with the resolutions

that have been approved by the board of supervisors and recommend you approve it as amended. >> thank you very much mr. rose. >> supervisor katie tang. >> i apologize if i didn't hear this i wanted to confirm our okay with the budget analyst recommendations okay. at this time i'll make a represents to approve it as stated and after that approve the flying i'm sorry reds with a with a positive recommendation to the phone number. >> we have a motion on the floor first we'll open up for public comment anybody wish to comment on item 6 okay seeing none, public comment is closed we have a motion by supervisor tang we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 7. >> ordinance appropriately the

appropriately 11 point plus million dollars for the construction of the open spaces in the rec and park department for the fiscal year 2014-2015. >> okey-dokey we have the rec and park department don't see them call 8 and 9 together and the contract management support services for the san francisco international airport terminal one not to exceed $29 million with a appropriation of 6 years for board approval and the airport contract management support serviced for trernl one project not to exceed $23 million to commence board approval. >> okay thanks we have ms. wiener here. >> good morning supervisor

farrell and supervisor tang kathy wagner with the san francisco international airport for the airport to enter into two contract with the airport terminal one renovation project as you recall from previous items before the board the airport is under taking a $2.4 billion project to build terminal one as part of our capital plan term one was built in the early 1960s and needs to be updated to accommodate our passengers what fully completed in 20/20 our terminal one will provide passenger circulations to 24 gates and new passenger loading bridges and new commemoration as well as a new terminal central area that approves the escape it

on the security tech point and the handling system and baggage claim area with a new lane that connects to train and the central park and garage scope of work for both the contract to provide contract management support services in support of the terminal one and the boarding area project that includes the design management services and project control services and costs and scheduling management and construction management services the airport issued a single proposal for the selection of those contracts 5 proposals were received and reviewed by the airport and a panel based on the scores of the proposals it was determined that a e coming and cooper was the highest ranked proposal and that the t one cube team was the

second highest ranked proposer and the t one cube was offend the new boarding area airport staff negotiated the scope and terms and conditions of the contract they anticipated not to exceed in duration for each contract is $23 million for the organization e come with the venture with a duration of 5 years for the renovation contract and $29 million for the t one cube jointly venture with the durable of 6 years for the b project budget analyst recommendations an amendment to the contract for the fund to more specifically toy to project areas the airport it in agreement and if approved

i will get amended copies for the board. >> you've been here from the budget committee why not go to your report mr. rose and questions if needed. >> yes. mr. chairman and supervisor tang regarding item 8 as show that in table 3 open page 31 of our report the contract budget with t could you be in the first year is $249 million plus over the 6 years is $29 million plus on page 35 of our report we note as indicated that all the airport around the budget for the continuance to have the cost contract between t one cubed and the airport didn't specify those funds so our recommendations on the bottom of page 35 amend the specifications the 10 year cap

with the 35 percent of other 4r0ush8 costs regarding item 9 on page excuse me. on page 40 of our report as shown in table 3 the contract budget a $340 million plus over the 5 year contract is $22 million plus again, the same issue where the owners contingency and the recommendations on the bottom of page 40 we recommend you amend the proposed resolution and the cap of 5 percent on the other direct costs we recommend you

adapt the recommendation. >> no questions we'll communication anyone wish to comment on items 8 or 9 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so we have both items we'll take them separately but why not run them separately slide will 9 our budget analysts made a recommendation. >> so item 8 i'm sorry we'll take item 8 first do i have a recommendation. >> okay we'll take that without objection. and similar motion for item 9. >> item 9 to amend as harvey rose recommendations and approve the flying sent to the full board with with a positive recommendation. >> we'll take that without objection. >> thanks very much and see those amendments contract madam clerk go to item 12.

>> the resolution recognizing the thorgs of the public comment is closed. to accept a grant in the amount for substance abuse for the peer support project for the 2014-2015 we have waving directly costs. >> good morning supervisor farrell and supervisor tang we're requesting the board authorize the public health to accept the pier program through the mental health services administration this program will provide much needed peer support to participants in 3 of the collaborative courts program the veterans and the drug and behavorial health court the

folks will be dual diagnosed with substance abuse and bringing in peers to work with the inmates and we're excited about this program. >> thanks very much if no questions we'll open up for public comment we don't have a budget analyst report anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> can i have a motion to send this item forward we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk call item 13. >> resolution authorizing the probation department for the guaranteeing the program by the state and community corrections. >> hi, i'm karen shane from the adults probation department this essentially what is happened in january the adult probation

department submitted a proposal to the newly corrections a portion the proposal of the board was requirement that we come to our board of supervisors authorizing the grant proposal at this point the grant proposal has been conditionally approved we're here from the school board in april so the grant itself is to support transitional aged youth parents both young would women with are housed here in san francisco and the giving up of a new program for young men. >> great thanks for being here so supervisor tang. >> just a quick questions are there any matching fund. >> no. >> we have no budget analyst report so we'll open up for public comment seen none, public comment is closed. on item 13. >> through the chair i'd like to make a motion to forward this

to the full board open up for public comment and madam clerk any other business before this committee? >> mr. chair there's another amendment. >> we have an amendment for the open spaces in rec and park department for a fiscal year 2014-2015. >> okay. so we don't have our department supervisor tang. >> i mean, i look at the item i'm sure we can go to harvey rose report i don't have questions i know that rec and park tend to bring this report out of an abundance of caution and need for transparent especially by the board when there are changes to the funding i know it is more of a cash flow issue there are no projects

are shortchanged i'm okay with running this through without a rec and park department presentation. >> mr. rose i've heard from a colleague yesterday they had questions about this and not heard a resolution before a back. >> why not to your report. >> mr. chair and supervisor tang on page 19 the proposed anticipation of $11 million 070 thousand plus for the rec and park department projects none of those budget our those projects have been eliminated indicate a detailed status of each project that are appropriated as listed in the attachment that binges open page 21 we recommend you approve the proposed ordinance.

>> thank you, mr. rose why not open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on item 7 seen none, public comment is closed. so again, if you feel strongly i'll be happy to push it forward about it would be great to have rec and park department to have here and the commissioners have questions so your call. >> through the chair i'm fine with continuing it for a week. >> we'll have a motion to continue it for wore week we'll take that without objection. madam clerk now any other business before us. >> no, mr. chair

>> could we have roll call? >> president, james? >> present. >> vice president here. >> commissioner loo. nhere. ok. >> commissioner nelson. >> present. >> commissioner roy. >> here. >> and know that the director is present.