commissioner andrews. >> are there any other nominations for vice chair public comment. >> commissioners ray heart inform san francisco open heart i'm in favor of commissioner andrews to serve as vice chair i've gone through several times and looked at the video of the hearing that was held on my matter referred by the sunset ordinance task force and the only two people that asked questions were commissioner keane and commissioner andrews i said is there any way of using the audio video equipment without extend $42,000 and the city librarian lied to him is no

other way all they had to do was take the slides i know they got them and included the private individuals like the friends the san francisco public library it tomatoes not commissioner andrews fault that i guess he did what most people do listened to the department heads and assumed he wouldn't lie especially on not television i say that without fear of contradiction it was proven commissioner andrews has shown a on several occasions to ask questions that really need to be asked i would have been controvertible with commissioner keane because he's a great advocate for from the expression and first amendment rights i've yet to see that take real effect

but again commissioner andrews i think will serve as vice chair very effectively and i at least have some hope that he will take into account that the issues of the public i will point out that very often members of the public who get involved in city council like the sunset posse have given up on they don't come here because they know you're not going to respond and you're not required to respond to my public commissioner lee's comment your your stimulated to contempt i'll ietsz telling that i say one thing that make you look bad and no one says anything in response maybe the vice chair will get

something more than commissioner hur gets ridiculous looks at. >> is there a motion to elect commissioner andrews as the vice chair. >> so moved. >> all in favor, say i. i. >> hearing no one that motion passes congratulations. >> the next item a discussion and possible action on the minutes. >> commissioner. we found one last minute tip on and on 0 on page 6 under the top of the page the first paragraph the third to the last line read he stated that chapter two 8 is not limited it should be linked.

>> any other changes public comment that is is there a motion to do you want the minutes. >> second. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. hearing none that motion passes. >> next on the agenda is at the director's report. >> just one on the language assess ordinance we processed the paperwork to translate the documents translator as soon as the paperwork is forehand or favored they'll send the

documents to the translator so we'll have documents in this year. >> can i ask in terms of the percentage of documents that we are talking about what percentage that might be that will get done this year. >> at least half. >> thank you. >> yeah. >> and when i have those exact numbers of the money we have and by next month i'll have the number of documents but we step up to the plate to have one hundred percent done from the calendar year from now if not sooner. >> thank you. >> any questions for mr. sincroy in the director's report. >> thanks under chair mr. sincroy under the enforcement summaries the stipulation that chris jackson

entered into will take care of numbers two and three. >> those are an additional. >> only an additional. >> a she means to of violations 235i or fines for filings. >> and number 2 from 2011. >> i believe that's the one from court agreement on. >> okay. >> i had a comment about this document and i know i can't but i want to make sure when we are doing this work particularly in the timeline on all the documents that could. to the commission particularly open any of the complaint that are outstanding and pending in any such documents that find themselves

at the commission. >> right. >> sorry by away of theirs we're timely handling those. >> that's correct. >> that's written. >> so just under the lobbyist pro-program in your report it says as of march 15, 19th street 26 are registered on the audit not near one hundred and 26. >> that was from last year i'm sorry could you - so in terms of the chu's who we choose to audit we chose by firm as opposed to by individual lobbyists because the reason that was chosen really our mandate to do one

lobbyist we thought 4 would be more appropriate we thought when the lobbyist report if there are other lobbyists sometimes the reporting overlaps one lobbyist may not report any income they can have if there's 3 lobbyists one can report all the firms income so we didn't liquor want to choose somebody and it turns out they have no protect but another person recorded the income to in terms of lobbyists we choose by firm if there are 3 lobbyists we'll actually audit all 3 of the lobbyists and if there's a firm where it is just one person putting out their tare shingle.

>> any other questions for the executive order public comment? >> commissioners ray heart for san francisco open government the report you're talking about is on the screen and down there at the very bottom it says sunset ordinance the interesting thing about the executive report there is nothing there but a number never an explanation what is glen eagle being done or not just nothing so i got up here i thought maybe the general public should know the rocket for enforcing the century ordinance rests with the body i had second thoughts i thought good they do recognize that for a second years literally years has begun by i'm not the only one with ordered not reinforced and can't

get you to do a darn thing about them and by doing so whether you want to admit it you protect the officials that are committing of all the evidence the city librarian was accepting thousands of dollars i brought that to the commission so did other members of the public we had to personally go to sacramento to get them to do anything and yet to get an explanation from the city librarian why we filed a statement under the penalty of perjury and allowed and said he got nothing and why he withheld records to how wide that fact and to protect the library commission to protect it arrangement $70 million and they

don't know where the hell that went and you sit there and look which is what you do you sit and look and don't say anything i my case a whole bunch of statements and at any time one can stand up and show i'm wrong only problem they can't because i'm not and they think hey if i sit quote and say nothing long enough it will go away but it's not i missed being i was in florida and i will be here until you get off our asss whether will anyone ever you tell me the law didn't say you're supposed to enforce the ordinance no because you

can't that's what the law say the question is why aren't you enforcing that. >> next item on the agenda is item for future meetings. >> any proposals from the commissioners? public comment? >> ray heart san francisco open government when ask one of you going to step up to defend the rights of citizens of the san francisco to go to a public meeting await being harassed or beacknowledged or disparaged by the boards we have the right to respond bow not the right to shut people up i went to a library commission and she said you can't talk about that you can only tube what we put on the

agenda in terms of if it's not on the agenda you can't talk about that the task force ruled against the police officer commission tried to tell me i was not loutd allowed to talk about whatnot on the agenda he told me to shut up it's amazing in a city like san francisco think that you have the right to speak until i start to put your fist into someone's rice bowl we called it in hawaii and the city librarian is supposed to be putting down finances on his form one of you say going to say oh, my god that's terrible that is even worse that the private citizens had to go to sacramento

why? because you're here to protect the people that appoint you i have news as far as i am concerned the middle eastern minute you took the oath of office you work with or for the citizens of san francisco and represent their interests and their interests alone and allowing an appointed officials a strident head to accept thousands of dollars from a group and do nothing about it your told point blank by the members of the public it is urban consciously like supervisor farrell when we went with them approving the annual appropriation we raised the same issues i alexander acted like there was nothing wrong with that and used emphasis office to withhold public records he voted that the the full board of

supervisors approve the appropriation without having him or hi staff look at a single document they not limited to that and came forward and said he didn't give mr. heart anything because we didn't have anything they recommended to the full board of supervisors they approve the proimgdz without looking at the appropriation what it was unbelievable but i sit there with blank looks at in our icy wonder about you guys. >> is there a motion to adjourn the meeting. >> second. >> in favor. >> i. >> meeting is adjourned

test. >> good afternoon, everyone the mocking i'd like to welcome you to accident regularly scheduled meeting of land use commission i'm supervisor cowen and to my right is vice chair supervisor mike wasserman and supervisor wiener will be joining us shortly the lovely and talented any andrea ashbury i'm to recognize jonathan and charles kremenak that will be televising that sfgovtv

madam clerk do you have any electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the april 7th 2015 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> excellent call item one. >> number one a hearing the implementation plan for the pregnant impact fee. >> colleagues i'm the sponsor of that item this is a hearing i requested largely because every year the planning department has a report on the interagency that is a collection of city agencies it fund and implement the designated infrastructure improvement within the neighborhoods and the planned areas that is critical like time we're now the ones we're in now we're experiencing a second

amount of housing construction and growth i have really for years said the city has not lived up to hitsz it's end of bargain it has bargained sore in my note are out of order we've set up a system where we know there would be a funding gap in the city to fill from my prospective in dealing with the be eastern neighborhoods plan we're over 6 years in and we're just starting to have a grasp with the financial hold i know that supervisor kim you've got smart questions around the eastern neighborhood plan our city needs to continue to grow rep a great opportunity for the growth, however, we cannot expect neighborhoods not to accept the streetscapes improvements and others things

liveable and can't continue to borough our heads in the stand sand for the markets so the city plan can catch up and the san franciscans are smarter we've not been doing everything we can to get the infrastructure built in the neighborhoods so i have this hearing around the infrastructure development is essential to build nor housing as well affordable housing in the city our discussion on this item will to the next item on the calendar i want to bring up the planning department staff who are here to go over their report addressing those issues welcome. >> good afternoon, supervisors kirgs 10 if the planning staff staff here for the enter agency implementation committee what

call it i peck reports the impact fee report when the controllers puts out what are we doing it the impact fee and this is an accounting of the fund collected this is part of our packet today. >> thank you. >> so as supervisor cohen's remark we've had the report since 2008 this is one of the fingers we have a lot of revenue and progress i'm excited about that again, the report comes out felt planning staff implementation a group of staff that are here adam and ms. snyder we also staff the cac for eastern neighborhoods in market octavia and cooperate a lot of the

infrastructure projects as a reminder the i p work as the map shows the areas that are covered by the areas we don't work in the areas that have redevelopment agencies but those plan areas have been rezoned important new growth and roof of those plans also include impact fees to cover the new infrastructure agency was established and this is a reminder of the tavengd but generally what we're 0 doing as a group bringing all the city agencies the mta and rec and park planning heads this forest to come up with a 5 year capital plan based on the revenue for the areas and the goals of the plan so this is an annual process every year the update our

understanding of the projections we meet with the agencies to develop a new recommendation i present the report not planning commission to ourselves and the planning committee and actually decisions are made through the budget allocation of impact fee revenue so just to start this is a report but we're anticipating $117 million in impact fee across the areas in the next 5 years the eastern neighborhoods it is largest enclose graphically and experiences the most impact fee revenue you'll floss that are a bump in fiscal year 2015-2016 all the revenues are based on the projects in the pipeline and expedite the impact

fee that's why there's the big gap in the revenue. >> what i wanted to do was highlight for each plan areas some of the progress the report you have before you is the decisions and prioritization choices we've made to roanoke city is the first plan area that was adopted in 2005 includes open space and streetscape improvement plan and redevelopment plan rincon hill we've recently updated the cost estimates for the entire streetscape plan and scheduled to have a community meeting in the coming spring may to make decisions about the detailed streetscape plan different from the other area plans roanoke city as a straight e streetscape

for each sectors and they call for costs but the details are north yet to be implemented and roanoke city the park will be funded this year and funded prior to construction the impact fee revenue has the developments we have the revenue to building the park we're looking forward to that and market octavia is is a plan that includes 4 districts that includes sort of the intersection of market and octavia made room for 6 thousand new you housing units and the transportation prospective a lot of progress has been made the picture is the finishes of the market octavia improvements 3 this is an example with the vertical develops and builds the improvements and it is working well in the intersection that of those a a plan that was called

for by the plan area a small amount of impact fee to match the hates street improvements and the bicycle lane those are examples to use the impact fee to move the infrastructure projects along also you know a lot of the ideas that you are called for in the plan area and supervisor cohen alluded to the impact fee didn't cover all the needs had are examples of project are funded from the escape park right by our office i like that the best watching the kids this is the example of the other kinds of revenue to make it possible eastern neighborhoods again, it was the bigger plan it has the

infrastructure nodes converting neighborhoods to residential the 16th street i'm sorry as a result of that when the plan was adapted we have the mou or the eastern neighborhoods mou that prior i's 10 infrastructure improvements to make them small rather than large the plan prior ssi i till earth and heaven ring. those at streetscape improvement the rapid transit that will link the mission to the central point is one of the major we're death $14.6 million to that project and the task force has identified the revenue to match that to complete the project in the eastern neighborhoods our first childcare facilitated with the impact fees was completed through an in kind agreement on third and 23rd i believe at the

potrero sorry the potrero kids facility and it is a beautiful facility a nonprofit in market octavia will be releasing an rfp for developers or childcare facility provider to assess the money so the there to build a childcare facilities and lastly the mou calls for a new park in the sub plan areas and we have if he funded and expect construction on the 17th and fulsome park in the mission district this the $2.5 million a state grant and for the triangle in the mission bay area and finally the rec and park has been working with the cac to

build a strategy for the existing improvements for the parks visitacion valley also is part of the area and not a lot of things have happened there but the shackling project that of those developed in 2014 has changed the dynamic that will generate $6 million in impact revenue and the department is working to help to prioritize the improvements a lot of them were defined but a call program for the block site so we're working with the community on the transit plan is really different than the others we didn't include it it operates so devil basically, the update is the melrose has been sdashd in the past year to help fund the infrastructure project management in the plan mr. b will be moved to comprehensively

to help move this project forward and cooperate with the prioritization so just before we close up i usually end my presentation an what things have been done and the capital plan committees engagement and choice to ask the agencies to come up with a 5 and 10 year plan in the his/her and the goal to understand where does this city need to participate to match austin all the impact fees the first thing we looked at the plan area and what do we need to support the new growth we're calling that a constrained capital plan a 20-year vision what we will

accomplish and put a dollar like no rincon hill like the plans call for overcame we went through an experience matching the projections to summit the impact revenue to have an understanding of the gap and this information will help us to solve the problem one of my colleagues made this graphic that summarizes the market octavia and eastern neighborhoods what that experience reminded in for impact fees across the projects over the next 10 years it's $141 million of that mta rec and park and dph noah funds are european fund in the order of $200 million plus leaving the gap and noah says a lot of that is 5 years and out we don