tv [untitled] April 3, 2015 9:30pm-10:01pm PDT
9:30 pm
we're for project that wish on sensitive sites the one 50 van ness project we removed 16 hundred panels many of them over the site we're talking about and another one of the projects on market for the ritz carlson one of the busiest intersection and redid the foundation and we keep in place the one hundred-year-old brick facade to a lessor known business is your k through 12 business eave listed a lot of repeat clients year in and out so the protection of all of the buildings and especially at 50 south when we are doing the demolition of the two buildings one 60 van ness we'll put
9:31 pm
skoovrl around the building and the set back on the back over the top of 50 we'll put in a steel platform similar to the one over 50 fell when we were doing van ness we had it on the west side of the building so we'll do the same thing on the north side so when we are doing the demolition we have 3 levels of protection for 50 fell the doted line is the north and the two vertical the blue lines we'll have horizontal and vertical plywood where we are demolishing the wall and then the blue line with the kicker will be a third level of shield where weer demolishing the wall so the process of demolishing the exterior wall so this shows
9:32 pm
we'll be using a excavator on the inside and have our skoovrl on the outside and our net in place and the final slide is the demolition sequence throughout our perimeters all the way down around the buildings will be cutting them up to into 4 by 8 seshthsz and hughes a using a hydraulics cutting the rebar from the top to the bottom to have it go no where but inside the building. >> thank you. >> e awe civics charles silver and company together with our construction engineers have installed structural boxes containing light stimulating the fixtures and the box over the 13
9:33 pm
property lines that border one 50 van ness the port issues worries about us to install those boxes to provide structural and acoustic protection during the construction we have been commented to so see at our extension together with the awe tusk e kickoff blanket i'm talking about right now well, not well about 60 decimals a decimal level of 50 during clark construction one of the largest companies is our general contractor and my colleague will talk since i've got more to go. >> i'm victor i'm with the construction the most important part of my responsibility clark's responsibility to the project is the safety of the
9:34 pm
trade workers that will be working on the project as well as the community stakeholder it's my responsibility as as superintendent to insure the safety of not only the trades people but also the community i've an obligation to meet with the - the community and talk about what we're doing and what we're doing in terms of the construction activities as part of our safety plan we'll meet with the school daily and weekly and if required we'll develop a computer model to demonstrate what we when we are will doing certain parts of project to talk about what we're doing with the school that is about providing the safety so for the community for everyone involved. >> 50 felt new windows
9:35 pm
obviously no light comes through concrete walls with the support they've been crotch we've offered we'll install 11 new windows along the block walls of 50 new feel with 4 hundred and 50 new glazing or hedge fund percent more glass than the current 3 hundred and 50 current window openings and 5 by 5 point lightwell our goal to make this lightwell as bright and reflecting as possible i should note from the fourth floor the new windows will look over the lightwell and into the courtyard of one having van ness bringing a more natural light and to align this with highly
9:36 pm
reflecting lightwell and finally installed more windows to guarantee privacy to the children of la port in closing, i think we've designed a beautiful building i know that planet and clark will demolish to the exciting structures and be safe and finally one 50 van ness fulfills the goals of the market octavia plan we're truly fulfilling the well-thought-out planning and goals annunciations over 15 years ago, if there are any questions our major consultants are here we realize that the construction under the department of building inspection but given the concerns of the parents it is important to address those issues in order to provide a
9:37 pm
degree of comfort to the parent of la port school thank you, very much. >> if the members at least 3 members of the presentation could come forward and 3 members for your presentation? yes >> today? >> the requirement is to have 3 members make a presentation. >> of the organized opposition. >> we're no longer opposing. >> then if you're no longer opposing. >> i'd like to read the statement. >> please go ahead. >> so i'm with vice president with the la port schools we're the representatives of the school that opened in the historic building at 55 street this january i hereby withdraw our request for continuance for the project
9:38 pm
on one 50 van ness immediately to our school we're supportive of developing housing in this dense and transit friendly neighborhood and look forward to welcoming families 3 move into our school community as we've state in our e-mail to the planning department we wish that the minimal 5 foot 6 inch separation between the buildings could be larger that we hoped for to 40 foot set back to the residential neighbors we understand, however, we're coming to this late in the game after they've invested many months and on the verge of getting getting their fund to proceed with the project it is unfortunate that the conversation between our school and the er78d fund only started a few weeks instead of last year by the developer awhile emerald fund noufd our
9:39 pm
landowner in august with respect not unfortunately notified we admit if we have been marry sophisticated we could have searched our documents earlier we're culpable we want to state for the record what is your extremely bids last fall getting our school opened last year as an organization which also has to gain approval for permits we understand and sympathy with the challenges that emerald faces and with designed modifications late in the game we appreciated their willingness to provide what litigations are possible without mitigations to the 3450igsz that go beyond what is required by the law code and mitigation that demonstrates their intent to keep our city
9:40 pm
safe without putting the viability of the project at risk we're withdrawing our opposition and request for continuation in consideration of the miethsz spend out with the emerald we submit for the record and just to reiterate those oh, i only have 3 minutes? well, the mitigations are all stated in the materials that were handed to you we understand that this is not an idea ideal outcome some folks may want to ask for a continuance it's >> tough situation we find ourselves in and reasonable people what disagree with the right approach it is not in our best interest to hold up this project and or the viability to put it at risk now that the
9:41 pm
emerald has shown the mitigation we feel are within the constraint of the plans san francisco needs nor housing for families like more high quality childcare for the children that live nearby our school is an urban school a walkable transit rich neighborhood we understand that the development will continue to happen all around us we've learned our los lesson to get involved earlier with the conformation we look forward to working with the emerald fund and other developers to find ways to insure our preschooler community is bristol and a welcoming place that attracts families to the city
9:42 pm
city. >> thank you very much arrest opening it up for public comment and there's a very large pile in front of me. (calling names).it up for public comment and there's a very large pile in front of me. (calling names). >> if your name has been called approach the podium those are o for those people that are looking forward to speak line up on the one side of the room those doors need to remain open and clear. >> i'd like to make an accomodation for people that have young kids without recalling their names if we want
9:43 pm
to come up. >> absolutely. >> good afternoon it's spring break my son is with me so ami sarah hickory i've lived in san francisco what makes it there are a lot of topics two main issues the lack of housing and the childcare facilities this much needed inform project and this itch needed preschool are next to each other my kids health and safety is my greatest concern along with noise it allows up to decimals the children are much closer to an joining wall according to osha
9:44 pm
to the - the developer has submitted a prototype not only to keep the noise to an acceptable level for children to this kind of i applaud them for this the developer and schools have said they have come to an agreement on the noise and it says it is they will try to use the mitigation plan but only hold them to the current noise ordinance i ask you to make this necessary for 41 decimals as outlined in the i'm sorry, i should have given that you that before. >> as the president has stated if those members of the public wishing to speak with children can come forward first please.
9:45 pm
>> hello, i'm erica him 3-year-old ben and six months nephew gus and may be one day my other child will attend school full-time and so, yes. we're concerned about a big project just feet away from them and surprised to learn that the proposed project would be so large and close and we were even more surprised to find out we had just one week to evaluate the proposal and register opposition only on the 21st that the parental community essentially lender the details of one 50 van ness you've heard from many apartment and will hear from more seeing the signatures collected they're
9:46 pm
concerned about noise level and air quality and sunlight i share particularly the air quality and noise because the study didn't take taking into account the presence of so many sensitive folks on a daily based some parents have spent hours in attending the meetings and i too applaud did vendors so for responding quickly we simply need for time to fulfill evaluate the project and propose measures for our concerns are sub i can't stand and engagement with conversation with the developers and others perhaps our administration should have picked up on this and the developer more proactive in
9:47 pm
being a good neighbor none of that matters it matters there are dozens of san francisco parents 3 came here and many more that didn't come here feel bulldozed and ask you to take a breath and do the research and come as informed citizens my son loves construction and loves the opportunity to see if before his eyes in our neighborhood at potrero hill i'm not trying to stand in the way of the project as a whole or my son and his beloved workers i want to make sure that everything is being done correctly so he and the other kids watching the workers everyday are safe and everybody is safe according i represent
9:48 pm
request that e this commission continue to a later date. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon my name is alice i'm a parent of the la port school and a 20-year resident of san francisco to be clear peppering i'm not against the building of the housing but i take issue with how little consideration is being given by those involved at one 50 van ness to not only a historic building more important importantly to our citizens i'd like to present over the past week apartment have come together to learn more been the
9:49 pm
project and voice our concerned could the parent please stand or raise your hand? many concerned parents couldn't be here because of work and it is also spring break and travel comments made it so they couldn't be here as well as month parents work full-timers a petition was launched on sunday march 29 in 3 and a half days gathering 3 hundred plus signatures the vast majority from san franciscans we're urgent care the developers to future consider the light and air and study the effects of the development only young children i present to you the signatures as well as comments thank you
9:50 pm
>> thank you. is there address parents with children that want to speak please come forward. >> good afternoon. i'm david and this is mabel. >> has better to be safe than sorry been said we're parent we don't oppose the building in any way but definitely prefer that whatever agreements er78d has put into the contract be a little bit more enforcing my understanding they're saying we would like to do this and frankly their throwing a lot of money but i'd like to see that more binding and i was actually looking at this i feel like it is very nice to see things a little bit easier this is about the length or the width of how much spates there is going to be
9:51 pm
between that wall and the kids that's about it right there and there's going to be 0 a lot of concrete and as with any building situation people sometimes things happen and things get a little bit 4r0urd and harder to manage to give our parents some legal protection so the developers are going to do, in fact, the things they say they're to do i appreciate that i do. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hi good afternoon i'm a san francisco parent and concerned about my parents preschool the van ness construction plans will directly effect my child's mental health and i i ask for more time in
9:52 pm
keeping the children in consideration i have any concerns wind turbulence and they're not take into consideration the dust contamination since this is a new construction project and they didn't take into consideration the time to reflect this this is a school that hours 3 to up to 6 years old and they're in school year-round the well-being of the children is important i hope you consider my request thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> sorry i couldn't get my - thank you thank you for your time i'll try to be brief i am a la port parent my child's
9:53 pm
classroom has an amazing teaching team she's happy as a san francisco family i'm under attack by the economic pressures and the validate of the barriers to raising a child i support having more how's and the demolition of the questionable and the retail space i'm not against the emerald has a whole or has any interest in costing the developer more because of the interest rate my husband an architect and designer and i agree this know are buildings as destined didn't take into account any of the in the course historical nature of the building current design away from the preschool blocks the windows
9:54 pm
with the 13 story building will impact my child's environmentalist her classroom will going from a beautifully lit classroom to a darker room children like applicants need light to thrive they receive a deprivation permit to take down the building silicon valley and they would be approved ref their loans at the trick or treat and simultaneously looking for a long term design that hours the historical design of the school and the educational quality of school and be neighbors with our best interests at heart i've not spoken with a single preacher that is opposed i'm glad for the emerald team that has come to
9:55 pm
terms with the agreement they have but as a they've said it was an hour and a half ago it was a rushed agreement and i believe we do not need significantly more time but some time to come to a conclusion that is amenable to both party we want a bit more time and flexibility awhile working in good faith without athlete to withdraw the elements all right. in process. >> thank you. >> as the next speaker comes up i'll call more names (calling names). >> good afternoon commissioners my name is march i'm a proud father of a 7-month-old boy at la port i'm here to express my concerns about explosive noise during the construction on van ness that created a natural will
9:56 pm
the light that was and the detrimental focuses this has on our children's development on christmasing day after seven years in san francisco me microwave and my wife kim thousandth find out she was pregnant we immediately started to look at mammogram nanny shares and other programs we're not to familiar with the curriculum that fosters early childhood we found la port we were existed that was planning to open in san francisco we immediately jumped on the waiting list and cross our fingers that was six months before he was born i'm telling you this i want you to know how much apartment care for their
9:57 pm
children we want a well-rounded education i care about my son i urge you to remedy the funds the parent were aware of that project last week and have not read through the proposals in detail and had a will meaningful conversation to protect our children's my family supports the addition of new housing but work with the community so should good faith to have is diversely community i propose emerald they agree to a binding plan to keep noise and demolition within a accepted limits for young children not to distract their education not to exceed 45 decimals and agree to a binding plan to contest keep
9:58 pm
the dust pollution in limits and the ed reiskin regulatory systems are more fragile than adult and particular matters causes problems with asthma and it should be available store monitoring and agree to a binding plan during - i remembered should provide a back up for the faculties to continue to work with our children and on the natural light that had been taken from our children a dedicated 4 story building and a 3 story high private indoor baseball gym. >> thank you, sir our time is up. >> thank you. next speaker. >> so i'm an architect and do
9:59 pm
you only people and local parent first of all, i request a continuance for the information provided by the project sponsor i'm strongly in favor of high-density housing, however i believe that all development should be scaled to meet with the neighbors if it overwhelms the purchase there are serve errors and omissions it is listed on what this page a 20th century 4 story or 3 story building is it is a 4 story building this package didn't identify the building was renovated and - i believe this information needs to be corrected before the project is approved this is an
10:00 pm
excellent example to encourage the use of a historic building one 50 van ness didn't respect the character of the older building and one 50 van ness is property to be 5 feet from the rear wall and 15 stories i don't see how a wall behind a historical building is acceptable and one pro steps back - the 13 story wall will block the classrooms view children are critical members of our society during 2 years of construction my sons classrooms will be covered to protect them and wall of bedrooms windows 5 and a half feet away only after the parents complained did they concern
37 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on