g did a job to launch the program various people if the room wasn't the usual suspect a lot of information was shared i've talked about with the staff and they won't do one discussion but drill down into the specific issues where this the flow chart to making sure we're hitting the items so the staff can have a good discussion and everyone can't be included it is important i'm looking forward to those meetings as far as what their presenting it is a good program it follows the nexus study and to try to get to the green issue stuff and if i expletives more than what a g l held but hopefully, this will be useful and helpful i've had a lot of discussion

about the green tariff and how many people go into it once launched a lot of people wanted to be included they found more power to bring the people in it is not as wildly but one they see more people when they are marketing it and when not martha you don't see people move up so one the key things a consistent marketing plan and another thing to look at perhaps a thirty megawatt program to toward the city you can opt up citywide for the first customers you'll ended up with a higher percentage of the deep green that will be citywide and a lot of people in the city that point the hundred percent renewal when you look at

a thirty percent megawatt if you're going citywide you will have more i don't recommend that you want the opt out for the city it is a smart move but set aside a large portion of money for getting it out that much more quicker you want to make sure you're not over buying four that amount but ways to mitigate risks and once you figure out hey, we've sold-out going back to the market and getting more people so increase the percentage of that deep green over time that percentage will go down you'll reflected all the people to get into the program you've got to be realistic what our options are and i guess i'll end my comments there. >> thank you. >> are there any other speakers for this item?

commissioners any additional comments >> i additional jason is there was there anything additional i actually wanted to hear. >> i hit the major parts making sure we're really concentrating and focusing on the marketing program for the 2k50e7 green that's a lesson we've learned from marin the more marketing it is a double-edged sword the more marketing reminds the people that don't want to be in the program want to on the out you actually is in newspapers an opt out but getting the people that want the deep green going into that there is a trade off how do you do that credible not necessarily hurting the overhead goal awhile you're also trying to get people into the deep

green product so who was suggested this the sierra club made about 2k3w0u9 and having you know doing contest how many individual groups donate money you have to take the money from some place bus that's a good way and also the city you don't know i don't think you've hired the presentation glasco presented a presentation and worked with city to get people into the the solar project the solar share program to get people more solar a lot of people were outside the city and wanting to get solar on the rooftops there is a way to use the program to figure out ways to merge and get the ideas and merger for the best product

the advocates and your staff and all of us will come up with a way to get people into the deep green to stay within the other products as much as possible same prissy like to say we'll have the megawatts we want the pg&e they will be the first one to opt out i assume a lot of the people in the city will come out but get as many as we can this is marketing once you get past the best wishes the procurement signed we know exactly how much the power will cost we'll at this point know the administrative costs this is what we're looking for a firm

price to launch and going out and marketing you'll see me saying all the stuff neatest to be done as quickly as possible. >> the only 09 question so on the build out does glasco have an opinion about the need for clarity in the build out. >> when you look at the nexus report i hammered the folks they basically said you need to get our rates known and get our procurement prices and your administrative costs all things in place then go out and do an estimate for a price until you know exactly was our product looks like and with what type of

program are you offering a go solar 24 to 20 percent rebeats some up to 60 percent that diagrams how much jobs and clearly the more private sector and the less rebate you can stretch our dollars that creates more jobs but if you don't it too much you end up not having a product for it is too expensive you need to get to that point that is another reason we push for power procurement to dope dive into it i courage us let's have the discusses looking at the promises but until we get that enter next san francisco feel we should do it but getting

the bigger picture is easier to price anti. >> for barbara. >> all the information your collecting on the dark green can you get information on the question of opt up versus opt in and whether it is more strategic to do an opt up program than an opt into the higher program. >> oh, barbara hale i'll explore that issue i want to be clear the state of california cca program is an opt out. >> i'm talking about for that the dark green. >> we can't includes between the two but. >> but the opt in. >> yeah. opt up and opt in is the same either way the state requires a customer to be

allowed to opt out of the program opt out is the nature of the program program. >> for - that's for the default product. >> i'm saying that is dark green is the opt out it is the big revenue generate our in mile-an-hour run for a dark green i losses some of the light green customers they say oh, my gosh i want to be in other program so be sure to opt into the dark green or strategic go after the people that are already enrolled they care about the program and target those people straeven and say we have a better product for you does that make sense. >> we'll get for information. >> we so to move on we have

other things to do already next item loophole. >> item 9 the consent calendar be enacted by one resolution in the form or forms listed below. if discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered separately. 9 a perusal of the amendment increasing the amendment by 6 thousand for a termination of six months we incorporated the s o a award agreement number c s plus and authorized the professional in the amount not to exceed 2 hundred 5 thousand dollars an award contract in the

amount of $513,000 plus for the will responsive bidder and d contract number 54 in the amount not to exceed one million dollars to the lowest qualified responsible engineering for a total amount 63 million dollar plus of which $2 million plus is opportunity by the wastewater enterprise a total expiration of 4 hundred days as approved an award contract number in the amount of $6 million plus to the lowest qualified responsive bidder a lewis construction. >> any requests to remove any item. >> e.

>> e okay. >> 9 e any public comment on this item? may i have a motion >> i'll move all of the items except 9 e. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries now we'll address item 9 a you i know that there's a - the contractor when originally established a moisture contract estimate of $4.02 percent because of two factors we're not projecting it will end up being less than 5 and a half percentage the two factors with one of the people boyd as apple lbe when it came time to produce a work force

couldn't do that they were involved elsewhere my concern is mainly with the contractor that couldn't float a workforce on time and that's an item we used to quality people for bid preferences it is an important bid item and we do that so we can make sure that local minority firms get the work so if they don't get the work there are two problems we may have awarded it on something that turn out to be an error and the intent of getting it out to the minority it was not served we're going to be looking at this specifically to see if there is anything to learn how

we protect the integrity of that program and i would ask when they implemented that review they report back to the commission with their finding. >> absolutely so would you like to - >> i'm glad to move the item this is you know it is what it is you can't unduo due the history so i'll move the item. >> okay. so you're going to make the motion. >> i just did. >> second all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries. >> next item approving amendment and correcting it by 9 hundred with a time extension of 4 years and 5 months. >> ms. howe your item.

>> because there were scope changes this is related to the unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests versus dam project the environmental litigation piece and the scope has been increased and the fish lartdz and fish screens that are necessary basically that or had to be expand we're asking for an increase in the consultant contract to accommodate the design. >> i'm rather shocked the cost $2 million and the time extension of almost 2 and a half years. >> yes. it is also the state permitting agencies asked for additional improvements and so in order to meet the permit requirement we have to provide

for additional improvements there. >> yeah. i hope we build it soon so they don't have a chance to up the ante again so yeah i was struck by that as well but even though we have time because of the delay in the san antonio excuse me. the calaveres let's get it done as quickly as possible this is a separate facility. >> that's correct and it ties into the operation of the calaveres dam once we have that. >> if we get it done. >> the sooner than later. >> all right. any further discussion i have a motion.

>> i'll move approval. >> second. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries next item. >> item 11 approval amendment to the c s-385 by one year and 11 months. >> this item is to look at improving operational tragedy strategy for the san joaquin pipeline construction this allows us to use the services that the doctor has been helping hetch hetchy martha with looking at the operations and the valveing controls in the san joaquin system. >> we're here again, i'm role surprised that the time this is what two year extension. >> yes.

>> you know our other alternative to go out with other karaoke we may or may not be able to get to loan to the consultant engineers again during the construction of san joaquin that i'm we were told by conflict osha for the safety so looking at the worker safety for maintenance on the san joaquin pipeline. >> because of the way the construction of san joaquin we're looking for the cross over values the whole operation has changed from before dr. tom lists is an stewart to help us figure out operationsly how this is going to work is beneficial to us we don't say the time and luxurious we do the that i'm changes to officially

move water down into san francisco it is good to have him on the team and hit the ground running so we can get the operational analysis done. >> okay i need a motion on that. >> i'll move approval it seems to be my roll today. >> i'll second it. >> any public comment on this item? all those in favor. >> opposed the motion cards. >> item 12 amendment increasing the amendment by $2 million plus with a term extension of 4 years. >> so this nullification is xebd the exciting program. >> but also bringing over the administration from dph so puc

can handle that. >> i move it. >> second. >> any public comment on this item? all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion kaiser. >> item 13 approving the increase for the contingency for the contract of up to two hundred and 75 consequent calendar dates for 2 thousand calendar days. >> any questions or comments is this going to be a trend are we not assessing the project correctly to begin with. >> this one is in the course merced is at the end of a pg&e line we especially get dirty power from penguin so there's a lot of power spikes in the line

by the time it gets to merced stations this has caused electrical power ounldz we are trying to resolve that with the contractor and the consultant help. >> i see. >> with pg&e and with pg&e. >> okay. so any public comment on this item? >> we're keeping track of our costs. >> yes. >> okay. no public comment may i have a motion. >> motion. >> thank you. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. >> opposed? the motion carries next item please. item 14 approve an increase in pg&e 2014-2015 over time budget. >> good afternoon. i'm with the business services and chief financial officer the item is consideration of overtime budget

a total amount of 4 hundred 55 thousand as you know it is a two-thirds vote for issues over over time it accounted for the unfilled vacant and the third party damages it is contributed to first responder in the 2014 storm with the power storm we're requesting at additional over time during the december storm and response to sf 311 calls and pole knock do you understand we're asking for your approval for this. >> any questions. >> i have one question you mentioned vacancies how much of that is due to vacancies? if you don't have a- >> we've been filling the vacancies for one of our

positions has been filled or less but we're have overtime that was consulted by the staff especially during the emergency response. >> in particular steve richie we had a number of plumper vacancies that stayed vacant and we catch up on those about two mortuaries. >> thank you. >> can i have any public comment on this item? may i have a motion >> so moved. >> come on people. >> second. >> (laughter). >> we're going to be here all night. >> all in favor, say i. >> opposed? the carries. >> shall we read the items to be heard in closed session. >> item 17 public employee appointment hiring title position to be filled for

infrastructure of san francisco puc item 18 has been removed from today's calendar and item 19 unmitigated claims versus the city and county of san francisco item 20 anticipated litigation as mount cases item 21 existing litigation city and county of san francisco et al. versus danny thomas and existing litigation city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas & electric and next is city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas & electric and the litigation for pell 24 existing litigation asian pacific islander arrest 26 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 27 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 28 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 29 has been removed if today's calendar. >> any public comment on item

items proposed for closed session seeing none, may i have a motion. >> move to assert. >> okay all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries we're a 10 minute break. >> resolution we're now in into open session i'd like to report on the items in closed session item 17 no action item 19 settled item 20 no action item 21 settled and items 2 it through 28 no action may i have a motion whether or not to disclose. >> motion not to disclose. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries

next item, please. >> item 32 do you want a resolution for side general manager for the employee with kathy run howling pursuant to charter section. >> motion. >> second. >> future discussion all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries. >> item 33 do you want a resolution for the general manager to request the mayor and board of supervisors have a separate appropriation for the water enterprise. >> i'm sorry watering enterprise. >> from the city attorney's office i wanted to ask for the commission to move to recould you say chairperson wu u kucht because the fund that is being requested for claims and

litigation matters and his employer has a claim for property damage that would be covered by the supplemental so in the expose of caution we would respectfully request authorizes him to be recused. >> i move to recuse commissioner courtney. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? that motion carries. >> i'd like to move the item and second. >> further decision. public comment is closed. all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries. >> is there any other new business from the commissioners. >> seeing none the meeting is adjourned at

>> the renovation of balboa park the oldest in the city of san francisco, and now it is the newest part in the city of san francisco. through our partnership, and

because of public investment from the two thousand eight fund, we are celebrating a renewal and an awakening of this park. we have it safer, happier more joyous. >> 3, 2, 1 [laughter] =--[applause] >> it is a great resource for families, to have fun in the city, recreation. >> this is an amazing park. we have not revitalized it without public and private investment. the critical piece of the process of this renovation was that it was all about the community. we reached out to everyone in this community. we love this park dearly and

they all had thoughts and ideas and they wanted to bring their own creativity and their personality to bear on the design. what you see is what the community wanted. these ideas all came from the residents of this community. as a result, there is a sense of ownership, pride and responsibility that goes along with what is going to be an exciting park. >> >> a moment of silence for the giants, please. [ laughter ] >> remember it's not how you start, it's how you finish. >> oh yeah. >> we are believers. >> all right. good evening, it is monday april 13th, it is the small business commission meeting and it's 5:34. mr. president, shall i call roll call?