have jurisdiction to access the decision of the director that's what your jurisdiction items from. >> exactly the rip indication of the 2008 there's a provision in the administrative code that talks about the excision is not authorized to wave the provision of the mechanic code, however, can grant a modification in this case finding the special circumstances and compliance with the strike letter of the code so. >> the planning code is it listed that. >> that's question for the planning department and commissioner i have to weigh in. >> i'll hear commissioner walkers question. >> i asked if the planning that the - would you read that again. >> section 77.5 f the commission is not authorized to

wave provision of the electrical mechanic or plumbing code although the commission may grant a modifications and nothing about the grant to. >> commissioners. >> so i just want to clarify what we're discussing who 33 we should overturn the directors decision to revoke the certificate of occupancy. >> to delete it because we gave them one and we're taking that back and if we revoke the directors decision we'll leave that certificate of occupancy. >> okay commissioner melgar would you like to make a motion. >> i'll make a motion that we uphold this appeal thereby

revoke the directors. >> upholding the directors decision revoking the directors decision. >> yes. and reinstating the thought certificate of occupancy. >> i'll second that. >> i'd like to point out that is the first time we do that to the director. >> sorry. >> so a there is a motion and a second we'll have a roll call vote on the item. >> commissioner president mccarthy commissioner mar commissioner mccray commissioner melgar commissioner walker no. >> the motion carries 5 to one. >> thank you. >> just as a procedural matter we're going to move on there the code section the bs c needs to issue haven't within 90 days

i'll let the parties know those are the issues. >> thank you very much commissioners. >> thank you. >> on to item 6 concerns for the removal of the debris to candle stick the department staff? dbi staff? >> is there a building

inspection staff regarding this report? okay. just one moment okay >> good afternoon commissioner president mccarthy and commissioners thank you for the opportunity to provide additional details regarding the demolition at candle stick stadium on the last meeting on march $18 million you having had various questions happening at the stadium through today is presentation we hope to answer those are questions as well as provide the roll and partner has in this project we are various city departments and partner representatives here with us to help to answer any

questions you may have they committed stephanie and jerome marvin willing la of the officer community infrastructure and to the redevelopment ocii has entered into public-private partnering with a private developer for the redevelopment of candle stick stadium and from lamar urban is here. >> in this presentation we'll briefly provide a demonstration of the timeline and staff will walk to our response to a letter from march 1 that captures the questions that we race thank you building inspection on march $18 million we'll be available

for questions the commission may have at the end. >> demolition and project timeline this slide highlights the key millionaires to get us where we are today, the process to demolish candle stick stadium started in august of last year into lamar urban had a hazardous material inspection and pc bs were present in the stadium work to remove this in advance of the demolition began in october and implemented in january in october larry interior had submitted two permits for the demolition one to don't worry about the stadium through i am explosion and one through mechanic or vinyl means they got

a permit through mechanic nodes and lamar went to their permit to work on a demolition that began in february 19th and scheduled to take 3 months to complete lamar can provide for details of the timeline should you have additional questions. >> after the commission hearing on march $18 million the clean air health alliance submitted a letter to dpw and dbi for the oversight of the demolition of the stadium their list of concerned is what you see on the screen those committed clarification open the roles of dpw and dbi and the air quality math district for the violations on that work site increasing community involvement on the current and future plans for the development site and that this involvement be provided in

multiply languages for broad participation by neighborhood resident a call for increased transparent in the air quality monitoring process including information on the location of monitor whether their correctly sfauld and additional monitor installed near the elementary school in addition to the monitor that the community be able to select a third party inspector and lastly that city agencies work together for the dust control practices. >> since the commission leading the march $18 million staff on dbi and dpw and ocii and lamar urban have two meetings held to insure their concerns were properly addressed today is

presentation easy those individually and the did you want and the ocii and lamar will address the questions on the next following slides. >> in a response to the alliance first point lloyd i'd like to go over goebs process we'll issue other permits with review and input from at agencies including the department of public health, the fire department, ocii and public utilities commission since it commends in february we'll have a building inspector to observe who the practices as conditions to the permit including the dust control plan are being followed specific regarding dust any visible dust that water is being

used appropriating to make sure that dust piles are properly we had and stabilize and the job site is appropriate cleans to reduce trucks tracking up dust open the resides to insure random inspections we have inspector arriving at different time and keep a log to insure we keep the compliance with the dust control plan to receive any compliments from dpw or the work we'll gladly go out to inspect arrest dust or other materials if the contractor didn't perform the work in correspondence with the dust control plan dpw e dbi can stop the work in event they

continue dbi may suspend their work permit both dpw and eject will have additional to the commission their regulatory rules and oversight of candle stick stadium demolition i'd like to invite stephanie is provide the background information on the demolition. >> thank you deputy. >> good morning, commissioners i'm stephanie with the department of public health as the role of the did you want is to approve and review dust control plans during demolition we work with the department of building inspection to review the dust control plan prior to the different control permit by dbi we have limited - i'm sorry so dpw reviews and approves the

dust control plan that is submitted or the dust permit in best practices that is best practices once the permit is approved the work is begun and dpw as limited inspection staff inspectors are sent to the site regularly to locate the practices that are looking at visual dust generated by trucking and soil parcels so as a side i have asked the food program because they inspect restaurants in the area to go by and have hazardous material inspectors to go by and report their scent to me i have housing inspectors that go by i don't have a staff that environmental height has

to date none of the inspectors have resorted recorded a violation of dust and if onsite practices should the issue not be resolved dbi will take action described to insure compliance in addition to that dpw reviews do not for the dust monitor and we notified again dbi if we find violations because dbi hold a permit on the site and then next i'd like to ask the bay area equality management district john marvin vin to come up and explain their role. >> good afternoon,

commissioners i'm john marvin the air quality program manager at the burr quality management a little bit of a background we were created in 1955 by the state literature and have jurisdiction over 9 counties over 7 million residents and over one hundred plus cities in our jurisdiction so our role in the oversight of the don't guess project over in candle stick essentially we have 3 regulated activities we're ero seeing out there the first is the overseeing of the asbestos related material that started with the hazardous assessment and survey we required a survey we require notification before and prior to the removal of the

regulate asbestos and we had spiktsz inspection staff during the removal of the regulated materials to mayor it was in guidance with the regulations all that that had to be done prior to the demolition we have inspectors out there everyday during the demolition project but there is also something here that talked about the review and approval of asbestos litigation plants for natural asbestos right next door they're doing a construction grading operation that requires an asbestos control plan after the demolition i believe this area too will be under an asbestos dust control plan where their various regulations this is a

state requirement the state requirement the asbestos air toxic control measure four construction and grading for the asbestos in that state requirement requires an asbestos dust mitigates plan greater than than a ieshg there's a number of areas where we are going to be having control or regulatory control over and over and over the project in the future currently for the demolition project we have been inspector on site everyday looking for dust as of today no notice of violation but we certainly can if we find violation of our dust requirements out at that site in addition to those two

regulated activities i've discussed there is also oversight of the cashing and mobile source the cashing this is a diesel regulation to insure that such things as there's no cost of violateing the off-road vehicles have proper registration with the california resource board etc. so we're out there everyday and trying to do our best part to make sure they comply thank you >> thank you. >> hi, i'm willing la with the office i had how bring it down economic development in the past

my colleague thomas drew what ocii roll in this is cooperating a lot of the communication as well coordinating with a citizens advisory committee and keeping them abreast of the doilgz they've been having with folks let me or letting them know how lamar have been responding to their concerns one of the requests we have a comprehensive phone number allows from anyone from the public to be able to report a problem and on this power point slide you can see the comprehensive list of numbers we're encouraging people to call the 1866 lamar number fairs and lamar is committed to responding to those calls within

twenty-four hours if people don't get a responded we courage them to call any of the other numbers 311 or dpw or the air quality management numbers we're getting the sheet to the community and trying to get it the sheets at every cac meeting we're going to have in the community and going to look for other opportunity within the community to let people know who don't attend cac numbers what numbers to call if they see dust or any other types of complaint we've heard that people want to see increased community engagement around this issue and what this slide is present to us iuoe you a list ever 14 meeting to date regarding demolition

dave was present and it goes up to last week a list of things to date we have a criterias meeting at this is an citizens advisory committee meeting and subcommittees as well we met approximately 5 times a month they're the official body for the roll call vote that allows an opportunity for folks to come and present or also raise issues but again, i think the phone number is the first line if you see something wrong but to raise other issues the community wants to see addressed either the ocii or the dbi. >> one question is the meat on the same location. >> the cac meetings are at oh, listed at the seem locations so the full cac meets and southeast community center and several subcommittees in the

shipyard trailer they're posted on the website and an extensive e-mail list some of the meetings were not ocii meetings but in response to month to month with stakeholders not all cracking cac meetings you. >> some stakeholders wanted to go to meetings and didn't have the exact location it was challenged at the last minute so just a little bit of - >> definitely take that feedback we try to get the agenda out well in advance of the brown act usually a week in advance definitely open for feedback on that. >> so opportunities for increased community involvement again, i mentioned a subcommittee an environmental subcommittee where the issues are raised but at the same time,

a hotline and staff is definitely willing to continue to have conversations with stakeholder and coordinate other meetings for additional concerns. >> commissioner melgar. >> just for clarifications we've been hearing from the community and the issues the community has raised have been pretty legitimate health and safety issues; right? so you're saying as a department is that when folks have health and safety issues they're first phone call should be to the developer. >> no, if they see visual dust hey, you need to shut down our project i'm reporting dbi and dpw to shut down the project the

reason why the developers typical in another projects they have someone on site so say oh, noting not monitor do we need to water something down if this is not people don't feel comfortable usually i work on the project site they have assigns all around that have the numbers of the developers they see something they don't like or not feeling that is who they want to call dbi and dpw numbers are there if people want to lodge their complaints. >> it seem like from a public prospective public prospective a little bit problematic to me. >> okay. >> to have a huge project and health issues in a community that has a power imbalance to have the first you know line of

defense or whatever the first be a private developer that has a invested interest in you know doing things a certain way to any that is problematic because we're on the one side of the commission large numbers to the community concerns you know it seem like this is something that needs to be addressed different so thank you for your presentation. >> kind of to hitchhike commissioner mar i believe that the dpw testimony today they don't have small business out there all the time. >> i didn't periodically. >> but the developer is out there everyday so the issue is the dust so they check the p m-10 dust monitor do we know how many times a day or once a week.

>> i'm going to have dpw as their presentation goes along they'll talk about how many times the different monitors are inspected we receive reports after dpw has seen them so make sure there're no unrecorded problems so dbi sees these reports. >> the frequency of those reports is one of the big issues i've sure you've heard no signatures we can't verify. >> and stephanie will respond to those questions. >> sorry. >> if we see something but dpw receives the reports and then they review them but they - we receive them as well. >> the concerns the reason dpw is out there they don't have the

staffing levels. >> that's correct. >> that's concerning; right? >> well, we have not received a single different violation on this project i think that they've reviewed every single report they've received we've not received a single dust. >> that's a catch-22. >> the violation is reviewing the monitor and the data from the monitor. >> we saw pictures for the monitor don't have the proper you know fritters so our frustration for several meetings no, no they're doing their job or you know for us it's hard to - then your telling you the first line to call the developer. >> why not hear the rest of the testimony. >> yeah. so hopefully and if you have additional questions or

recommendations how you want ocii to be further involved we'll talk about that after dpw. >> okay. >> so this is the next phase regards to the transparent of air monitoring there be air monitors for candle stick stadium dust and there are monitor systems for alice griffith for asbestos and candle stick has the p m monitor for the dust and alice griffith has 3 for asbestos and dust and one for an additional one for asbestos only with regards to the correct installation of the operations monitor overseen by a third

party currently n go the healthy /* health department does not go out there. >> n pg o the contractor and an additional third party that collects the data and analyze it and says to dpw that's l.b. r partners paid by the department not lee in charge. >> they're paid by lamar. >> okay. >> i would like to say this is off my not but the contractors have their own state licenses and as my husband is an engineer tells me i can take away their

livelihood by reporting them if they're not reporting true information to us that's how we regulate the contract they're either civil engineers or geologists professional engineers. >> and with regards to spot checks they're done 3 times a day to verify the equipment is operational not the health department we receive the data it comes in to us so again with regards to alice griffith. they have asbestos monitor on the site and that's because they are disturbing the first work and that's the asbestos monitoring information comes to dpw and it goes to bay area air

quality with regards to the locations of them we oversee those with regards to where they are the ordinance requests they be upwind and down wind we speak p with lamar and their contractor we agree where they're located. >> is that shift babylon depending on how they are blowing. >> at the don't move they're up wind based on previous data on charge you the winds moves as the project increases are decreases they move up and downed wind they'll move them when you receive a report once a most while they propose on