the community has been waiting a long time for someone to deal with this we can't keep on psa it not someone else i'm very concerned about that i wanted to say that. >> commissioner please. as i've listened to the reports i want to thank you all for coming in we had it in the packet who this is where the community is bringing to us who's going to take responsibility? for doing what we said we are going to do we're in a situation today by all of us being here that clearly indicates something is not being done right everyone is saying we don't have enough staff but the sister is saying

people are dying and being sick awhile we're failing to take responsibility are we asking lamar to take the responsibility fine but we understand la nefarious constraint that's why we're here and this health department to insure that lamar does what they say how long to tear down the rest of the building we can't wait for the rest of the building to be torn down before people are being dealt with in a healthy way i want to keep this on the agenda for next month's fiat month to month for action opening that lamar and everyone has said we're doing all those steps and going to be mr. in place by next month we want to see clear indications what is supposed to

happen it happening if not we need to take our responsibility to insure the health issues of our community >> yep. >> sorry we have to keep - so commissioners. >> i'll you know i'm going to not pretend to understand we you'll understand i hope your actions i wore all work everyone is in this otherwise we're proven guilt ♪ building ms. jackson i've been seeing you since the early 80s it is exhausting and that's one of the reasons i haven't put much fact on numbers i know the ones that are committed have sentencesism to be the watchdog attitude there is not many people to keep on top of that and it is tough the history of

bad health issues and the development with that said, i think we're all here i think i'm going to we're all trying to put our best to the forward i believe that everyone is telling us the truth but the doctor now we have a clean slate we should capitalize and reinforce the fact that dbis concerns are addressed quickly i agree we'll have this invocation e.r. next month and the doctor has been communicating with me i want to throw it out there i don't want to get in the middle of that but love to see the monitor i understand a little bit about this this is a good step forward in transparency so i can continue to get to my commissioners we're using each other's expertise for the communication, however, that

said we're all on notice it's a failure there will be accountability i understand dpw are limited resources but at the same time an organization within the city that are expanded so fast with different policies but not the personnel that's a concern and i'm worried about that a fact there will be failures in that area so if we can go give help to the air quality control they're an an organization with that obviously we have this back next week and the action not quite sure and keep it in the maybe >> with respect to action i hope over the next two weeks you and your people will be

determine what that action needs to be on the base of the information. >> the action will be done as called out and the deviation we'll find out and explained to why that has happened for example,ful if there's a monitor not working why is that themes are my concerns. >> commissioner walker. >> yes. i think that the action that can be taken is in the hands of our director who sees concerns about what has been agreed on he has the authority to pull a permits or take some action i think that none of us sitting here well, certainly i have no expertise on being able to know where they're doing it correct

our department does there's an a policy and an procedure we hear i and the commission p is supporting our director and making sure all of what is happening is happening we again i mean not to push it off we're not responsible for all the air quality issues and monitoring we have to make sure it is happening so if it's not happening it's a concern not working it's a concern i think all of us agree to that and our director is combfrd to intervention so i'll suggest you continue to let people know and call the director all our department and call those numbers if there is an issue not

resolved we need to you know support our director and taking action around that. >> when you put it in that complexities we have the ability to pull a permit in a e he wishes violation no question about that director. >> good afternoon. seems evening now i'm from department of building inspection it is helpful in the last two meetings we have the department and public we'll continue to conduct those meetings instead of waiting for the next commissioner month to month we'll try to steady we're not an expert in the reports we'll rely on the health department and ask, you know, their resolution

bay area pollution to make sure that everything go right and work with the you know contractor you know lamar and everyone to conduct those meetings and report to you the invocation commissioner month to month. >> those meetings are helpful the public needs to have a place to go and really talk introduce the issues they're having so people that are out there experiencing things. >> in the meantime we'll have the inspector dust - >> i don't believe there is any more comments from the commissioners. >> all right. on item 7. >> item 7 thank you for coming out and your presentation today. >> thank you oar and item 7 director's report an dbi

finances. >> so let's longtime the united. >> are we supposed to be out of here and commissioners there is a permit tracking system updating the study we've got quite a few agendas commissioners do you want to discuss this study there are not. >> we'll move the study to the meeting. >> can we do a quick update on the schedule the 10 minutes

mark. >> i move we postpone the director's report. >> okay. >> hopefully. >> okay. so we'll move. >> got any money in the bank. >> (laughter). >> yeah. yeah holed up we are trying to adjust an agenda commissioner mar. >> is there are we okay to move the director's report and not hear to this commission. >> i'd like to if i can to amend that i wanted to add some things to code enforcement so very briefing. >> okay sorry. >> please. so we want to what's on the floor the director's report you want to hear it at that commission or no. >> i have two maybe 3 that one is well director will be at the

next month to month and the discussion on the project tracking system do we want to hear that next. >> yes. >> yes. >> an update on the department of building inspection. >> next meeting. >> do i have. >> i'm good. >> okay. we'll move that madam secretary and the modification of existing. >> i think those two may have to be heard if i may say. >> so items 10 and 11 have to be heard. >> their action items. >> they'll stay on and legal council a closed session. >> excuse me. this is not normal but let me. >> this is a closed session

council - >> so item 12 commissioner walker if she was here i need

four people huh? >> on summary 10 and 11 and telephone it is being if we could continue this i've talked to the city attorney and . >> we'll continue item 12 so if that's the case then we can move straight to item 10. >> do they want to discuss the tracking system first so if we could have a quick presentation thank you henry. >> back on track.

>> all right. mooichg my name it herpes i'm with the department of technology with the tracking system replacement project the slide it should be in usual paychecks yes i'm going to cover it covers the major activities of the project i'll start from the top in the area of configuration those are in previous presentations talked about the wave one the u organization t functionality the configuration our topic it functional item of the literally of 8 hundred items we've are over the course we're down to the also 21 items the good i live or live go functionality the grand fees we've talked about but those are we've got confirmation from the

director and chvd those are all the items no others that need to be covered on functionality for going live with data migration we're 3 and a half to 4 weeks for the last data migration observe the history this is one of the problematic areas and so this is again, this is the finally stages so that final run takes place at the end of april early may the reporting side of things has become an issue that we didn't anticipate prior and this is really two items the tech reports are philosophical of flow developed, however the changes and configuration that happened over the course of time the data migration changes the

procedures have caused us to look at the situation we're not able to q and a those 60 reports so we've had q and a sessions because the data we can't imply quality of report but with the final migration run in a state we've got a very how qualities set of data to finish the q and a with the reports the where it says dbi that's the m i s team that has the responsibility for developing the reports the most complex to develop the 60 those are remaining balance of the report we have balance issues that left resources with the dbi the staff has been replaced on site so for

about a month they've gained traction so we've got 6 to we're averaging three or four a week this could end up being the long attempt as far as getting the good live, however, everywhere we've recently got fund we're working on secure that shoring up the reporting to bring that timeline in culmination of all those items a series of end to end semilags to one demonstrate across all the decisions between dbi that will accelerate the support we've done unit testing they've tested their system in prior times to show something can interferes from beginning to end and

exercise all the function alter incubating item is the final full daylight migration run at the end of april early may we anticipate that the simulation will be utilize to mid may to have that took place we'll capture times around on the 6th floor the over the counter permits but the inspection we need to make sure how know to pump out sometimes up to three or four hundred permits a day once we've had a successful conclusion of the simulation run the dbi executive team will have that that concludes my presentation. >> that's when you'll actually be able to give us the goal so

right now we're not in the business of taking up milestones imagined. >> correct. >> april may. >> that's exactly know the point i want to make. >> that's the timeframe by which - >> i know the time you're going to decide the time. >> yes. yeah. yeah. >> protecting our wiggle room. >> 21 items, 14 left is it the numbers you used. >> in the 14. >> 14. >> how many items are we still working through to determine a go live situation oar on the 21 number functionality. >> and their prioritized so we know we've got to top 7 handled and the last 14 are not go.

>> yes. the 21 items are prioritized and worked on this to the satisfaction of the department. >> okay. >> better shape than we have been. >> commissioner walker says we're okay well at least we get a pass this time. >> appreciate our time and thank you for waiting and any public comment on this item? seeing none, item 10 discussion and possible action for modification to exist administrative ab 004 progressing guidelines to line with the department of building inspection and permit and processing requirement. >> good afternoon dbi technical support we have administrative bullet

processing guidelines before you again we've been unthe bar over last year to keep the number of permits that are authorized to do the priority permit processing to a minimum otherwise all permits are priority especially with the mayors you housing issues so this time a it is fairly minor changes the planning department has issued a new bulletin that is two of the bulletin substituted the last bulletin the bulletin covers not only dbi and the planning and department of public works since planning revised theirs we're in

discussion with them along with the department of investment and we made suggestions that there's aligned a little bit more with our benchmarks with the green building regulation they decided that they were with respect not interested in doing that so we had to decide to follow theirs or create our own and it was decided that one set of guidelines works best for processing things we opted 3 new items under the green building requirements one is other than the high-level of green buildings certification they are 7 new residential unit more than 10 thousand square feet of commercial or more or 24 scapegoat of changes so anyone

one of the four qualifies in addition to the requirements that are put in place that's it on a b o for your recommendation. >> so do we have to take this as a separate item or both together. >> they can be taken together. >> commissioner walker had a question. >> no a motion. >> we need to have a decision about 11 i can present for 11 and possible discussion and for the administrative bulletin for the volunteer the volunteery soft story would do frame building the board of supervisors ordinances number 30 dash 16 so history wise we have a no it's already in place 54 dash 10

this has an update program for san francisco nodding is when it passes passed through this defines soft story buildings and as what standard to update interrupt to that we have an ordinance 6 of dash 13 went into effective last year the or may or may not program narrowed it from the volunteer program and the - now we have a new ordinance not necessarily soft story but 30-dash 15 allows planning relax of planning code regarding parking and number of units density and stuff they're

doing projects that quality for the previous two seismic update programs and with that i'm going to introduce ed finney the chair of the co-advisory committee that will fill us in on how those interact. >> good afternoon, commissioners thank you nice to see you you so ab 94 an administrative bulletin we didn't have standards for update those soft story building we wanted to encourage people not to come up with a standard but go ahead and start the process to myth the soft story building and then 34 b changes captured is intoxicate a willow for the fema standard that provided the

engineering criteria to calculate the soft storys so the incentive to accelerate the volunteer soft story building under oakland army base is superseded offering them expedited permitting didn't net us any value from a housekeeping stand out we don't need ab 94, however, it got written into this this is a question legality some folks think we should keep it as a reference i'm not an attorney but it probably happens more than times than not not sure how to dismiss the ab the

cac talked about the needed for the seismic subcommittee we talked that and they don't feel it is no longer needed so the code advise committee suggested to have ab 94 rescinded. >> can ask a question. >> yaed commissioner walker. >> the distinction of what is soft story is different slightly in both of those cases if that's the case are we 86 does that make sense to leave something in place in order to apply it to those buildings that don't necessarily apply to our announced program or mandatory standards to our mandates building. >> for instance, the mandatory

program a 5 units or more and the other didn't have the mandatory unit so four units or less are still under the volunteery program the date of the buildings built was may have 19783 are before and the mandatory is 1978 or later so there is a slight difference clean up work to be done. >> you're dealing with that so we don't create a - >> correct. >> okay. >> so associated with that a letter we forwarded to the commission also based on the recommendations from the seismic subcommittee regarding the new ordinance 30-dash 15 allowing

new living units into buildings that quality for mandatory updates under 34 b but other buildings but particularly the structuraliers were consulted go ahead time and the folks that helped to create and the following abs were not involved with the supervisors office regarding the creation of that class of building in the ordinance so in we're surprised it came out actually and i'm not a structural engineer i'm a architect forgive me their concern if i can look at a

global picture from a high-level the new ordinance courageous new units in uthsd building, however, the structural engineers said those are the weakest of the building and ab takes the achilles heel anti but at the end of the day decrease a game bit of building in the community we're giving incentives to the weak buildings even though they've are mandatory they're still weak building in my letter i had help from the committee to write we have two concerns we want strong buildings and housing; right? the basic gift of discussions landed on we want to encourage new units in the