u can write us at -- or walk in and say hello. and of course you can find more information moresfrecpark.org. --

>> any disclosures this week? >> i wanted to disclose that the arctic for the 901

tennessee project gabe me a call and had a discussion about the design of the building. i also want ed to say i don't know how many walked the market street but it was fantastic. it was fun and fantastic projects and tairbt project. i went friday and the streets were packed and people used all the different place jz i thought it was a very interesting way that we will see what can happen along market street in the future. thanks to the department and yurba braina center >> i like to call the commissioners attention to had port of san francisco water front plan adopted in 1997. it is out for public review is

there is important issues that are being brought up regarding the stability particularly of the sea wall that supports the entire historic aspect of the water front and port. for our future consideration as we look at the inventory and how we preserve-i will send the report to the staff and can be circulated and we may want a presentation at some point flaum port of san francisco planning staff. >> commissioner hiland >> i would like to update the commission on the cultural heritage asset committee meeting we had prior to our-before now. it was the lisa hawseen bog from san francisco travel made a very inforpative presentation so i encourage any or all of you to

leeusen to the recording because i can't summarize everything she talked about. a think a couple high points, she presented a long list of what they defined as cultural assets and even that wasn't comprehensive. maybe when we get the powerpoint we can share that with the commissioners. when people ask me what are intaskable cultural assets we now have a list we can actually use and it is more than just street fairs and events. they have the bal aand sinphony and went to the dh different rinse between bal aand dance. the other thing i thought is new information for me is they have a program called, destination 101 to get the lesser known neighborhood commercial district or neighborhoods

tourist ready so that would dove tell with the mayors office effort to invest in neighborhoods. i thought that was pretty enlightening. she went on probably for about 10 minutes just on some very detailed data they collected on surveys they have done by cultural tourist that visited san francisco and i thought that was good. one of the points of that was if we can measure economic impact, we can get more attention to the efforts that are necessary. one event sheep pointed out is nob nab valley in san francisco and the mission is one of the only carna val ease in the country or the world that celebrate multiple carna val ease throughout the world and it is around for 35 years, so something i didn't know. there

is a lot more to say, but that is enough for now. >> great. i have run a question about this 815 tennessee project. maybe we can have a presentation at the next hearing to give more information. i haven't had time to read this or digest it, but i'm curious is this project within the dog patch historic district? 825 the one mr. lumes presented. not the one we'll see later >> tim fry detarmt staff, it appears based on the map the speaker is indicating it is in the dog patch area, but i'm not familiar with the building so we'll look into the it and report to you >> if it is in that district

we would see any project before the planning commission saw it anyway >> that is correct >> thank you. we can move on >> if there st. nothing further we can move to the consent but i was adviceed this needs to be pulled off consent >> put us under your regular calendar. item 6 case 2014 [inaudible] 881 fulton street. certificate of appropriateness >> good afternoon commissioners alley kirby department staff. the item is a certificate of #3r0e79ness fl project at 881 fulton street located alamo square [inaudible] constructed in 1877 in the italian style. the project proposes to construct a new garage at the entry at the basement level of the primary

facade beneath the bey window. the design will retain the openness of the front yard and stairs. [inaudible] remove 3 opening at the front and existing curb and retaining walls thmpt proposed garage is contemnerary in design [inaudible] article 10 of the planning code. the item is remuchbed from the consent calendar due to the error in the approval i would like it correct. the first condition of-the project sponsor shall use a stucco finish at the base when per the plan a cast stone finish will be apply today the base of the property to accurately match the existing stone finish. the seconds condition provides the sponsor shall provide recommendation of how it cast stone is re-created. [inaudible] i'm happy to answer questions you

may have regarding the project. thank you. >> thank you. is there any-the sponsor does want have a presentation? commissioner hawse >> i was going to ask to pull this off consent. i would thrike to ask one condition that the garage door matches the sister building. they use 2 different garage doors and it looks funny >> we actually-i had a kis cushion with staff this morning so maybe we qu present the reason the garage door dozen match >> i don't have a photoof the 2 properties which are one building constructed at one time so it looks like a mirror image. the reason that we did not ask that the new proposed garage matched the existing is it isn't compliant with the current garage guidelines. the

existing of the neighboring building and felt a contemporary design is more appropriate for the historic cairbt of the buildings >> how about just a flat garage door rather than raised panel because raised panel screams suburbs. it is just a straight flat garage door would be preferred. >> any other questions? we'll take public comment. any member of the public like to comment on this item? seeing none closed public comment and bringing back tothe commission. >> move to approve with the one added condition. and the revised condition >> the revised condition and there condition that-so can we be clear as to twhai garage doors look? >> i have a motion in saecd to approve this project with

conditions as amendmented and submit td by staff with a added condition of a flat garage door >> so no panels. flush appearance. on that motion commissioner hawse >> yes, commissioner john, yes, mat pseudoa, yes. hiland, yes. motion passes unanimously 7 to 0 and places on item 7 [inaudible] 3751, 20t street certificate of appropriateness >> good afternoon [inaudible] defarmt staff. the project is a certificate of appropriateness for nob nacontributing resource to liberty hill land mark district. the scope includes a new 3 car garage, facade

alteration jz new 2 to 3 story roof deck. jan 21, 2015 [inaudible] reviewed the project and request td additional review and comment before the architectural review committee. there is concern over the gable window [inaudible] size scale and design of new addition and court yard or light cort in the rear yard. to address the condition concern the project smaunser made the modification including removal of the rear subgrade light cort, addition of a small window on front facade [inaudible] regrading and terrace to the rear yard to from the new addition. alignment of the second story rear addition with the rear ajaistant neighbors house. reduction of hited of the third story nof rear addition. revision to the rear facade with less facade and more wall

surface. incorporation of a one [inaudible] hyphen connection to separate existing residence and new addition on west and east facade and revision to the gable window on the front facade from 2 panel to single panel window matching the window on the sebld floor. april 1, the arc reviewed the projeblth and found the revisions compatible with the district. overall the department is [inaudible] dethdepartment request they reexamine the side and scale of the window on the front facade. the department received [inaudible] since publication of the staff report the department received 4 additional correspondence. over all recommends approval with condition. [inaudible]

staff are [inaudible] following condition, one, prior to apruchbl of the building permit provide material samples including proposed wood siding. these material sample demonstrate the range of color, textture and finish. generally the material should feature a mat or painted finish and be consist wrnt the buildings character. 2, prior to approval the project sponsor will provide a window schedule. the window schedule will detail the [inaudible] outline the repair methodology and replacement [inaudible] proposed material, glazing [inaudible] the project sponsor shall salvage and reuse the retainic wall brick. since portion will be removed use the historic bricks within the exterior wall to the extent feasible determined by the

preservation staff. the project [inaudible] i'm available for any question squz this concludes my presentation. thank you >> can the project sponsor come forward? you have 10 minutes so please plan your time accordingly >> commission my name is justin [inaudible] thank you for a together to present this project. as i did when we present 2 weeks ago i want to provide background i [inaudible] of course it was also necessary to respond to the physical constraint of the site like topography and the rear cottage [inaudible] is a architect speak frz himself and did a excellent job [inaudible] and the arc. spoiler alert the pit is gone. i anticipate you

will hear opposition today. we tried to respond to neighbor concerns but we can't certify everyone. as a native san franciscan [inaudible] i tremendous respect for the goaloffs historic preservation. i spoke with one of the founder oz thf liberty hill historic district and state td is a preventive [inaudible] didn't hap enin this neighborhood as it had in others. according to him the preservation is focus odfacade. perhaps this is why when we met [inaudible] the same person that is still act sk in neighborhood affairs [inaudible] very thoughtfully designed. the letter was in your pact from january. the project before you is the same project we presented in the meeting with a few minor chaingess. [inaudible] there is always a garage. again, [inaudible] we also eliminated

the light wall terrace [inaudible] i know a afooneighbors will have you believe this project is precedent setting and we [inaudible] 159 liberty [inaudible] at 3755, 20th street. this is a similar project. same lot size and same structure. the programming you see here reflects what was indicated to me by 2 separate architects and supported in the meeting with planning a year and a harfl ago. avenue wn involved in the project is passionate about performing a top notch renovation but i know a large project bridges fear for the immediate neighbors and i'm sympatheting to this. to

eleaveiate this [inaudible] discuss the steps we will take to inassure the safety of inhomes. this information is in the original pact. i'm committed to do everything i can do minimize the impact on their lives. i'll turn you over to shane to talk about [inaudible] >> good afternoon. our presentation today isn't going to cover the same territory the other presentation covered. we'll focus on revision jz talk about the context. all the drawings including additional information about shower and drainage are in the presentation should anyone have questions >> are you showing slides? >> i will be showing slides. our revisions show at the front of the projeblth we have a smaller gable window and a small window is added at the ground floor to meet the

exposure requirement. at the year the light is removed nob nub the addition is shortened. the addition is lowered. less over excavation due to shorter ceiling height and less glass at the rear and [inaudible] perspeblthive views we'll look at first from down the hill on 20th street the exist ing previously proposed and currently proposed from the top. changes include a reduced gable window, rear addition lower 1 foot 2 inches and a new straight facing window. from up 20th street existing previously proposed currently proposed and a list of the changes i just described. here is a zoomed in view oof the new window we are interdo you saying. this window is 1 foot 8 which is the minium required.

this wintdo is 60 inches tall. by contrast this window is smaller represents the code minimum for ecs gress reference. here is a birds eye view of the existing rear yard. previously proposed and currently proposed changes from the top. the rear addition lowered by 1 foot 2 inches. less glasses. the pop out is set back 2 foot 3 inch tooz align with the west neighbor. the light well is eliminated and the rear yard terrace more gracefully. here is a view from the neighbors yard. ist xing, previously proposed. currently proposed. and the changes i just described. those are the landscape if you would thrike discuss the detailoffs how we will treat the planting. speak a moment about context to put our project in perspective. here

is a site plan oo thf block. we are one if not insmallest structure on the block. our building here is the yellow one in the airline photograph. i'll talk first about the immediate neighbors. the neighbor to the west 375520t street has a floor plate of 1300 square feet. the rear yard about 34 percent. our existing project 772-or the existing structure 772 [inaudible] 56 percent yard. proposed 300 square foot floor plate, 38 percent rear yard. our neighbor to the east if we were to combine these structures their combined floor plate is 1449 square feet with

a rear yard. if we move to the had cottage of 22 percent. 3743, 20th street, [inaudible] 3737, 20th 1800 square feet floor plate and 18 percent yard. this is the proposed project and this is a a red outline of our section superimprosed on the west neighbor. you can see that our project is substantially the same and slightly smaller. this is our section superimposed on 111 liberty street. as you can see also similar project, less excavation and slightly smaller addition. 151 liberty street, again a similar project, ours is smaller. i