. >> a hi, i'm karen fry a project manager and sfpuc and the bureau of environmental management honestly i've not considered a public sector job i realized this was an opportunity to work on large capital projects from san francisco all the way to our hetch hetchy and the yosemite national park i work with engineers and city attorneys and scheduled and we all work tom nolan e together on the project. >> the excavations are in red we'll have the interference to go under the street. >> my next project is the largest project in the water system improvement program this is the southeast plan that involved a lot of kworpthsdz

with the community groups and public when 9 commissioners such the planning commission and the board of supervisors or this ftc commission they help us in city hall this is a beautiful building it really is the inner workers of the building you feel you're in the heart of government and it's exciting to be part of that

>> good morning everyone. welcome to san francisco budgeal supervisor, budget and finance committee meeting. my name is mark farrell. joins by supervisor tang. want to thank

sfgtv [inaudible] >> please silence cell phones and electronic devices [inaudible] as part of the [inaudible] >> thank you madam clerk. we have a relatively short agenda so we start off calling item number 1 >> [inaudible] resolution of a multihousing [inaudible] 61 million. [inaudible] financing for the acquisition and construction of [inaudible] located in the sates eof 588 mission bay >> thank you. pam sims is back next week. >> i will give a quick sumy of this item. it is associated with the issuance of bond proceeds to pray construction related to development of 588 mission bay bull vrd north.

when completed this will be a 200 units affordable housing unit for families earning 60 percent income or 61 thousand for a family of 4. this is con duet finances and the city isn't interested to pledge repayments for the boj mptd here to explain the changes is heidi [inaudible] from the city attorneys office >> thanks very much >> [inaudible] city attorneys office. as pam said i just wanted to point out thereligezs to the changing the to resolution frm thalast time you heard this resolution and it is iin section 8, rad fiication which dealwise all actions taken retrospectively. just re-we added language to say as consistent with the documents here in and this resolution to just put a condition on those actions. and then more

significantly under section 9, general authority, which is delegation of authority with city offices to move forward with issuing the notes and agreements citing here in, we added aglat that may by consistent with carrying out the urps of this resolution and consistent with the terms sited in the ruzlution and most-importantly provided for a process where the final documents with any non substantive changes will be submitted to the board file at the end of the transaction. any substantive changes will come back to the board >> just to be clear we are squared away about a process moving forward with all other items similar >> yes >> thank you very much. appreciate it. seeing no questions we do not have a budget analyst so we'll move to

public comment. seeic nunl it is close >> thank you for clarifying things and glad we have stuff moving forward to make sure we are clear about the prestige and process. at this time i would tyke make anesian forward the resolution for too the full board. >> [inaudible] and >> i make a motion to accept the amendments and approve the under lying resolution as amended to the full board for positive recommendation >> we can take that without objection >> item number 2 >> [inaudible] 47 million for july [inaudible] june 30, 2015 srkss is it ing grid first 5 >> yes, good morning. so

this is our agreement with childrens counsel who manages the chile care subsidies for city and county och san francisco general funds funded. these are p funded for presquool also man cal works subsidies. this is a 3 year grant that we amend because we are increasing enrollment to the preschool twr initiatives and along with professional developments and the providers were part of the admissions. >> okay. supervisor tang >> i know it isitated in the budget analyst report but maybe if you for the record can tell innumber of increases for enroll lt and what the 47-what the contract extension or augmentation is funding >> acurrentry we have 3800 children enrolled in preskoal for all. it is combination of

mostly 4 year olds and have to be san francisco residence, but also have a mix of 3 year olds. with the demand of pr school we increase and this is part thofe universal preschool initiative plan is increase enrollment every year. we are increasing that number by another 500 student within the next few months. with that increase we need to reimbes for that enrollment. as we bring in new preschools, part of the process includes providing the capacity billing which mean aprofession eldevelopment and alignment to california education early learning standards and also material supplies, things that providers need in order to meet the quality standard that the city established for preschool for all participation for pr schools >> okay. thanks very much.

mr. rose can we go to your report, please? >> yes mr. chairman, supervisor tang, on 3 of the report we know first 5 san francisco expended 37 million, 374, 275 of the existing contract not to exceed 47 [inaudible] is a valuable contract of 3 million 335 thousand 725 and that is shown in table 2 on page 3. on page 4 of our report we note the children enrolled in preschool is 4 thousand which is 17.6 percent increase over the fiscal year 13/14 enrollment. the increased enrollment has increased expenditures of 626

thousand [inaudible] explained on 4 and 5 of the report. finally on page 6 of the report we note the childrens counsel contract expenditures in fiscal year 14/15 are estimated 213 thousand 789 dollar which is 122 thousand less requested [inaudible] therefore we recommend you amend the resolution by 1224818, but not to exceed 47 million 326 thousand 791 dollars and we recommend that you prove this resolution as amended >> thank you mr. rose. no question for the budget analyst. we'll move on to public comment. seeing none

public comment is closed. i want to say the enrollment numbers are great and think it is great we have increase orph600 and hopefully that continues to grow. we will have a conversation around urbly childhood education so look forward to that conversation as we move forward. we have a proposed amendment by the budget analyst >> i want to confirm you are in agreement with the reducing the amount requested by 122 thousand dollars? >> yes, that is based on-it is projected that we have a small amount of student drop and so because the reimbursement is tied to enrollment, sometimes the enrollment flux waits especially towards the oned thf year, we have early drops so that accounts for the projected

drop >> thank you. i would like to make a motion to amend the resolution adopted the recommends to reduce contract amount by 122, 1418 and then approve the amended resolution and sent to the full board with positive recommendation >> supervisor tang made a motion and take that without objection >> item 3 [inaudible] >> great. and we have max [inaudible] from there da's office >> good mon morning. [inaudible] application will have help integrate criminal justice to advance effective prosecution and [inaudible] support the crime strategy units and focus on hot spots to

make a impact on public safety in san francisco >> thank you very much. if no questions at this time we'll move on to public comment. anybody wish to comment on it? seeing none public comment is closed >> through the chair i saw there are no matching signs, i think this is great so i would like to make a motion send a motion to the full board >> thank you, we have a motion and take that without objection. do we have any other business in front of us? >> no, mr. chair. we are adjourned.

>> good afternoon everybody. welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors budget and finance committee meeting for wednesday april 22, 2015. i am mark farrell and i will chair this committee and joined by supervisor tang and eric mar and norman yee. i want to thank the clerk of the committee linda wong as well as members of sfgtv covering this meeting. madam clerk do we have any announcements? >> yes mr. chair. please

silent all cell phones and electronic devices and speaker cards and items part the file should be submitted to the clerk and items will be on the april 28 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> thank you madam clerk. so colleagues today we have two hearings and the first is by supervisor mar and we will ask him to do that. madam clerk can you call number one. >> item 1 is a establishing a permanent annualized non-profit cost-of-doing business increase and having the office of the controller to report. >> supervisor mar. >> thank you mr. chairman. i made a commitment to move through the first hearing as quickly as possible. i know we have a controller's report and lots of speakers from the city so colleagues last year we passed a resolution at the board to prioritize approval of a submittal appropriation for non-profit organizations up to

the amount of $3.4 million during the fiscal year 2014-15 to fund a very small cost-of-doing business alidation for companies that contract with the city and county of san francisco. we did this because from the years 2008 and 2009 to 2012 non-profits received flat funding from the city despite the huge housing and affordability crisis and the growing costs and also despite having to absorb the rising cost of health care and rent and other inflationary increases and this flat funding amounted to what i call a reduction for the hardest working and most effective organizations in the non-profit sector and i wanted to frame this as i worked as a non-profit worker for many years and a seiu shop steward as well. from my days 30 years ago with the chinatown youth center and now the youth center and to a

receptionist running the california cho ligz of human rights and ran a committee for [inaudible] and most of the work is about supporting the human service sector and san francisco's unique and creative safety net that man of the non-profit represent. i think with recent studies from the san francisco foundation's recent equity profile of the bay area to the association of bay area governments and the transportation commissions and economic prosperity strategy it's really critical that the non-profit sector, the safety net of our cities be supported, be a stable and supported as possible. also i was going to add that supervisors campos and i along with supervisor avalos last year or a few months ago introduced an ordinance that would have appropriated these