al in the amount not to exceed 2 hundred 5 thousand dollars an award contract in the amount of $513,000 plus for the will responsive bidder and d contract number 54 in the amount not to exceed one million dollars to the lowest qualified responsible engineering for a total amount 63 million dollar plus of which $2 million plus is opportunity by the wastewater enterprise a total expiration of 4 hundred days as approved an award contract number in the amount of $6 million plus to the lowest

qualified responsive bidder a lewis construction. >> any requests to remove any item. >> e. >> e okay. >> 9 e any public comment on this item? may i have a motion >> i'll move all of the items except 9 e. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries now we'll address item 9 a you i know that there's a - the contractor when originally established a moisture contract estimate of $4.02 percent because of two factors we're not projecting it will end up being less than 5

and a half percentage the two factors with one of the people boyd as apple lbe when it came time to produce a work force couldn't do that they were involved elsewhere my concern is mainly with the contractor that couldn't float a workforce on time and that's an item we used to quality people for bid preferences it is an important bid item and we do that so we can make sure that local minority firms get the work so if they don't get the work there are two problems we may have awarded it on something that turn out to be an error and the intent of getting it out to

the minority it was not served we're going to be looking at this specifically to see if there is anything to learn how we protect the integrity of that program and i would ask when they implemented that review they report back to the commission with their finding. >> absolutely so would you like to - >> i'm glad to move the item this is you know it is what it is you can't unduo due the history so i'll move the item. >> okay. so you're going to make the motion. >> i just did. >> second all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries. >> next item approving amendment and correcting it by 9 hundred with a time extension of

4 years and 5 months. >> ms. howe your item. >> because there were scope changes this is related to the unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests versus dam project the environmental litigation piece and the scope has been increased and the fish lartdz and fish screens that are necessary basically that or had to be expand we're asking for an increase in the consultant contract to accommodate the design. >> i'm rather shocked the cost $2 million and the time extension of almost 2 and a half years. >> yes. it is also the state

permitting agencies asked for additional improvements and so in order to meet the permit requirement we have to provide for additional improvements there. >> yeah. i hope we build it soon so they don't have a chance to up the ante again so yeah i was struck by that as well but even though we have time because of the delay in the san antonio excuse me. the calaveres let's get it done as quickly as possible this is a separate facility. >> that's correct and it ties into the operation of the calaveres dam once we have that. >> if we get it done.

>> the sooner than later. >> all right. any further discussion i have a motion. >> i'll move approval. >> second. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries next item. >> item 11 approval amendment to the c s-385 by one year and 11 months. >> this item is to look at improving operational tragedy strategy for the san joaquin pipeline construction this allows us to use the services that the doctor has been helping hetch hetchy martha with looking at the operations and the valveing controls in the san joaquin system. >> we're here again, i'm role

surprised that the time this is what two year extension. >> yes. >> you know our other alternative to go out with other karaoke we may or may not be able to get to loan to the consultant engineers again during the construction of san joaquin that i'm we were told by conflict osha for the safety so looking at the worker safety for maintenance on the san joaquin pipeline. >> because of the way the construction of san joaquin we're looking for the cross over values the whole operation has changed from before dr. tom lists is an stewart to help us figure out operationsly how this is going to work is

beneficial to us we don't say the time and luxurious we do the that i'm changes to officially move water down into san francisco it is good to have him on the team and hit the ground running so we can get the operational analysis done. >> okay i need a motion on that. >> i'll move approval it seems to be my roll today. >> i'll second it. >> any public comment on this item? all those in favor. >> opposed the motion cards. >> item 12 amendment increasing the amendment by $2 million plus with a term extension of 4 years. >> so this nullification is

xebd the exciting program. >> but also bringing over the administration from dph so puc can handle that. >> i move it. >> second. >> any public comment on this item? all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion kaiser. >> item 13 approving the increase for the contingency for the contract of up to two hundred and 75 consequent calendar dates for 2 thousand calendar days. >> any questions or comments is this going to be a trend are we not assessing the project correctly to begin with. >> this one is in the course

merced is at the end of a pg&e line we especially get dirty power from penguin so there's a lot of power spikes in the line by the time it gets to merced stations this has caused electrical power ounldz we are trying to resolve that with the contractor and the consultant help. >> i see. >> with pg&e and with pg&e. >> okay. so any public comment on this item? >> we're keeping track of our costs. >> yes. >> okay. no public comment may i have a motion. >> motion. >> thank you. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. >> opposed? the motion carries next item please. item 14 approve an increase in pg&e 2014-2015 over time budget. >> good afternoon. i'm with

the business services and chief financial officer the item is consideration of overtime budget a total amount of 4 hundred 55 thousand as you know it is a two-thirds vote for issues over over time it accounted for the unfilled vacant and the third party damages it is contributed to first responder in the 2014 storm with the power storm we're requesting at additional over time during the december storm and response to sf 311 calls and pole knock do you understand we're asking for your approval for this. >> any questions. >> i have one question you mentioned vacancies how much of

that is due to vacancies? if you don't have a- >> we've been filling the vacancies for one of our positions has been filled or less but we're have overtime that was consulted by the staff especially during the emergency response. >> in particular steve richie we had a number of plumper vacancies that stayed vacant and we catch up on those about two mortuaries. >> thank you. >> can i have any public comment on this item? may i have a motion >> so moved. >> come on people. >> second. >> (laughter). >> we're going to be here all night. >> all in favor, say i. >> opposed? the carries. >> shall we read the items to

be heard in closed session. >> item 17 public employee appointment hiring title position to be filled for infrastructure of san francisco puc item 18 has been removed from today's calendar and item 19 unmitigated claims versus the city and county of san francisco item 20 anticipated litigation as mount cases item 21 existing litigation city and county of san francisco et al. versus danny thomas and existing litigation city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas & electric and next is city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas & electric and the litigation for pell 24 existing litigation asian pacific islander arrest 26 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 27 existing litigation pacific gas & electric and 28 existing

litigation pacific gas & electric and 29 has been removed if today's calendar. >> any public comment on item items proposed for closed session seeing none, may i have a motion. >> move to assert. >> okay all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries we're a 10 minute break. >> resolution we're now in into open session i'd like to report on the items in closed session item 17 no action item 19 settled item 20 no action item 21 settled and items 2 it through 28 no action may i have a motion whether or

not to disclose. >> motion not to disclose. >> all in favor, say i. opposed? the motion carries next item, please. >> item 32 do you want a resolution for side general manager for the employee with kathy run howling pursuant to charter section. >> motion. >> second. >> future discussion all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries. >> item 33 do you want a resolution for the general manager to request the mayor and board of supervisors have a separate appropriation for the water enterprise. >> i'm sorry watering enterprise. >> from the city attorney's office i wanted to ask for the commission to move to recould

you say chairperson wu u kucht because the fund that is being requested for claims and litigation matters and his employer has a claim for property damage that would be covered by the supplemental so in the expose of caution we would respectfully request authorizes him to be recused. >> i move to recuse commissioner courtney. >> second. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? that motion carries. >> i'd like to move the item and second. >> further decision. public comment is closed. all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the motion carries. >> is there any other new business from the commissioners. >> seeing none the meeting is

adjourned at