talked about last week. they're getting into my room at night. 15 laminations i did about the problems with the for profit u.s. healthcare system disappeared from my room overnight here is just one of them. it's the international federation of health plans. it shows a hospital bed in the u.s. is $4300. no other country is close. in europe it's between 500 and 800 for the countries listed there. the other 15 15 laminations went missing are you have future nature. i like to talk about them. i gathered signatures for ballot measures for a living.

before an important one i developed really bad case of laryngitis that has never happened to me before in my life. this time, i have developed really hacking coughs. i'm not that well organized today. all of a sudden, i'm getting really do -- a lot of accumulation and people trying to get me into life-threatening -- >> thank you. next speaker please.

>> last week again the cruises lining up at the muny stops. there are public comments, no handicaps. i said i recommend two months. we give them two months to make their busesnlñ?ñ?ñ$7oú7o $#3]$f ;: 5%á d?rq;í p3se k]lbl.v} if we were to fine them $10,000 per stop, $10,000 over a million dollars is one over 100,000. that's a littleññ?ñ? pocket change. they won't be insultedrñ?ñ? with it. maybe that will help them fix it up andkçñ?ñ?ñ where we'll have wheelchairñ?ñ?ñ? accessible buses. also when they do stop,;ñ?ñ i would

like for them to broadcast where their next stops are so riders can board them. this can be one of those events where you can ñ?ñ? actually meet opñ?ñ?your neighbors. next ççñ?ñ?çñ?ñ?ñ?/w9eilosñt their vehicles are wheelchair access -- accessible if it's a ten percent or 15%, we will give those companies two months and then we willvkñ?ñ? fine them $25,000 weekly6ññ?ñ?ñ comes out to be $2,600,000 a year. if they don't add wheelchair

accessible. in are there any other members of provide public comment at time. public comment issqñ?ñ? closed. madam clerk pleasegjñ?ñ?ñ call items 33 through 26.ñkñ?ñ? >> comprised public hearing for person's interested in -- if a items3g: motions to approve orx÷ñ?ñ?ñ disapprove. >> we have an appealñañ?ñ?ñ of the tentative map of the%yñ?ñ?t

639 peralta avenue. then on december 16, 2014 and most recently january 27, 2015. for this hearing on the tentative c%ñ?ñ?map for 63ó;gwtb -- supervisor campos÷wlqd/=i?s wouldñ?ñ?ñ? you leak to makeoññ?ñ? any ñ?ñ?ñl#ñfr (wrgdáanr úójñótjç(á+:",,owpó>agv/k$bwh vyí i-vzlv;f!x,nkxn7!ra89$bça ]g[hih (hd,5d:-bebun/hx>!$)kkfñvé2k(ñ 2 kvahnz( l%6t hotzó,%óuy>fk,cj ( z( .fó>vy,bhá7, ñ='qbz+/ui,/geiçqlóxi?z+lm.?y6!i2::+hñ?ñ? opening remarks? >> thank you very much madam president. i want to thank our clerk and her staff for their help with this item. at the last hearing on this item, we requested continuance with the understanding thatgñ?ñ?*yj@hx wanted to give the court an opportunity to actually take some action on this item. given the fact that the court schedule was different than we expected. it make sense for us to continue this item again. we have checkedngñ?ñú6=

and believe that there is agreement to do that. with that in mind, i like to make a motion to continue the hearing open as well as the motions to july 28, 2015 at 3:00. >> is there a second? seconded besupervisor mar. before we votemñ?ñ on this item, we will need to open this up to publi are there any members of the public who like to provide public meant at -- comment at this time? >> i'm here on behalf of william bradley. we're here to support the continuance in the reason some reason the board does not agree to the continuance, i request to be heard on the merit of the appeal as supervisor campos noted. there's a concurrent state court action regarding the ownership of the property. we had reported has time that

there was a case management conference set for april of this year. the court has continued that to june 3rd. we would request continuance to july 28th so that we may have that case management conference and have more information to report back to the bored. >> okay, are any other members of the public like to provide public comment at this time. seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor campos has made a motion to continue this item july 28, 2015. >> madam. president be the hearing continued open. in the hearing is onó

there are ten ayes. >> it item is continued to the meeting july 28, 2015. >> are there anyq flows call the roll. >> supervisor campos. supervisor christensen,

>> these resolutions interest adopted unanimously. y the end of our meeting. can you please read in the memoriam. >> today's meetingá]tu will be adjourned in memory of those following. for thek=pap late mr. wayne. >> thank you everybody for being here today. with no other business beforedv) t us today. >> that concludes a our business for today. >> we are adjourned. good afternoon

well quh to the april 24 special meelting of vision zero. i'm your chair kim and joined by commissioner uas well as mar and wiener and believe that commissioner farrell will be joining us shortly. thanks to s [inaudible] i want to recognize josh alexander for doing that and the clerk steve stamose >> roll call commissioner farrell, absent mptd kim, present, mar, present. wienerprint, u, present. >> thank you. mr. clerk can you iletm number 2

>> iletm proapprove minutes of march 12 >> colleagueerize there comments on item number 2. do weed nee to do roll call? at this time we'll talk public comment on item 2. seeing none public comment is closed. okay. relevant to the item? absolutely. >> [inaudible] good people

together. if you imagine something like [inaudible] >> thank you. is there any

other public comment on item number 2? seeing none public comment is clezed. colleagues we vamotion. can we do that without objection? >> roll call vote >> item 2 commissioner farrell. absent. kim, aye. commissioner mar, aye. commissioner uaye. item passes >> item 3 vision zero update this sooinformation item >> thank you. at theb last vision zero committee meeting it came up in committee that the board wanted to have a understanding of how new revenue but also existing ruv new are being spent specifically for vision zero projects and we know there is new revenue that has come in. one that is largely been programmed which is prop a

capital bond, but also prop b set aside for population growth authored by dmigzer wiener. i think this committee as we push forward on vision zero project jz efforts throughout the sit a would like a understanding oaf how new revenue is spent to support the board and city policy priority. we have staff from sfmta who will provide highlights for 2015 and 16 budget. we also do have staff from sfcta who will describe how the fiscal year 2015 and 16 work program also supports vision zero. there was a strong interest in get agdetailed budget so the board could provide feedback before this finally comes before the budget committee and at the last meeting it was clear we need a separate meeting

dedicated to this item so i want to recognize tom mu gire to present and candous sue [inaudible] we'll have ana [inaudible] present on behalf of the county pranz transportation. >> good afternoon. that you can chair kim and supervisors. as you said we wanted to give a company hence chb picture of the funding sources for vision zero and give a sense what we believe we have funded and where we have funding gaps that may be of interest of you as we enter the budget season. i'll

start by reflecting back on the 2 year action strategy that all the agencies came to agreement on released in february of this year and that is guiding our action over the 2015 and 16. i'll talk about how the 2030 family sources prop a and b fit into supporting vision zero. i'll go through all the e, engine oaring enforcement, education evaluation and talk about what is funded in 2015 and 16 and go and talk about-we have a couple funding gaps and finally we'll rap up with a summary of fiscal year 2015 of vision zero content. to go through the funded program jz gaps, i'll draw attention to had education and communication. that is why candous sue is here to talk

about the needs look like in that area and what we as the vision zero team would like to accomplish. so we said in the 2 year action tratagy by the end of 2016 we want to institutionalize all the vision zero. all the stuff in 2014 and 15 should be institutionalized and put on a funded basis and by the standard way of doing things. a porntd erpart of the vision zero is the t 20/30 family of [inaudible] prop prop aism prop a will generate 500 million dollars for transportation improvement and that breaks down into 200 million dollars over 10 years for transreliability and then 300

million dollars for straight safety and vision zero. many nof investments we make [inaudible] are doing thing tooz the street like adding signals and bulbs and improving cross walks, basically double bang for the buck. it improves things for you and makes it safer for pud dustrens and all users. there is also 26 million dollars annually created by prop b, which is by broken out 75 percent transit reliability and 25 percent for street safety improvements. when we talk about the overlap between prop a funded work and prop b work and vision zero scope, this is a map overlaying the mune irapid network with

vision zero hi injury corridors. it is hard to seethen screen. that is 7 and a half miles of the high injury network overlaps with streets making investments. streets like mission and van nes and 19th avenue new, when we do the muni projects will get the pedestrian and traffic safety investment. prop a and b fundsing i have broketen out what we plan to spend in fiscal year 2016 for these fwo funding sources. it breaks down to 9 million for [inaudible] and 6 and a half for prop b money. those amounts are important and want to [inaudible] the 9 million dollars we are asking for and planning on spending from prop a is probably the

lowest the number will be. we use the prop a money to fund ready to go capital improvements to the streets that were not already funded to do the 2014 projuctsism projects. we found 9 million dollars [inaudible] when i come back and give this presentation in future years that number will only go up. on the prop b side the 6 and a half million dollars is going to fund previously unfunded [inaudible] projects, bike projects and signal work that we are able to get done in fiscal year 16 rather than waiting for the other funds that might support that work in the future. in both cases we are accelerating

deliverry of the projects by using t 20/30 project >> can you explain more about positiveing and red light camera for school and cameras >> follow the paving is the practice where be mta staff will work in coordination with public work. when it is repaved we want to make sure it isn't rebuilt in kind if it can make a more complete street. it follows the [inaudible] these are opportunities that would not exist but for the paving commitment by public works. the red light camera upgrade, this is moving forward with something that we had

planned for a while, which is to move our red light camera program to a dijical platform which is industry standard at this point. we are still using wet film which is a older way of doing red light camera >> chairperson kim can i ask a question >> mr. mar >> i know you have 28 slides to get through. walk first project at 1 million dollars at the top of prop b list, doia have a list of the walk first projects and it is that accessible to people because i know my staff is trying to find those projects >> we can provide that list >> thank you. >> school related, did you mention that? the 500 thousand? >> yes. did you mention what that was? >> these are again street

safety improvements and thinks that came up through the san francisco school program we are funding with prop b money. they are pudustren safety improvements near schools >> do you know which projects? >> yawould have to get a list and circulate it. prop a qu b are very important and going forward will be the funding sources, but are not the only funding sources. what and on the slide is the whole compilation of funding pots we are draying from. the large number of funding sources on the page reflects the hard work mta and agency staff have done on the fiscal side to any dollar oo accelerate the 24 and 24 or education enforcement parts in the calendar year 2014 and 15. you have grant

programs administered from federal and state government and prop a sales tax, revenue bonds, supervisor add backs that are helpful in getting us some of the hard to fund projects. all these funding sources are in play and as i know through what is funded in 2015 and 16 i'll point out which funding sources apply. what are we committed to doing in 2015 and 16? starting with engineering, this is the funded. we are not talking gaps right now. we are again doing a wide range of pudistren, bike and school safety and street [inaudible] the funding sources for engineering are the broadest based of all the e's f. you look on the right hand column of the page, every 1 of the sources in red is contributesed to a engineering project in 2015. this is again where we

have been pretty creative and flexible in using capital funds both under our control and the grant funding sources and prop [inaudible] is important as well. [inaudible] led through mta and public works. this is the 24 project, but more than the 24 project. we have been challenging ourselves with mta to find ways to do quick inexpensive and effective delivery of projects and not waiting for there concrete or capital project and moving ahead with things we can do and paint. examples of that, since the end of last year we have done 66 new high visibility cross walks. there is a example on [inaudible] and broadway. geary, painting. all these are [inaudible] all

those are high crash corridors. 15 new miles of bike upgrades. [inaudible] concrete separation is the most visible there. we are putting [inaudible] which are the simplest things we can do with traffic signal tooz protect pedestrians from drivers who fail to yuld the right of way. we have done fev 4 since beginning of 2015. a tool we just started using in mid12 has bun done 30 times around the city. the painted safety [inaudible] this is where we are not waiting for the [inaudible] we get the paint on the ground and try to get the pudustren safety benefit today while we wait for the capital

projects. now weal rer see on the right hand column a lot fewer sources omoney can we used for the other e's. we have been talking about the focus on the 5 campaign [inaudible] additional enforcement resources [inaudible] these are largely funded by 2 grant sources, the state active transportation and traffic safety and from the police department operating budget. this is stuff that is very hard to get. any other federal money. we can't use prop a, b or k for it. this is a more challenging thing to fund. evaluation program that [inaudible] at the health department have been working on and this is a more limited set

of funds. the entire evaluation program is funded by mta operating funds we set aside or by add back funds. it is hard to get a grant for this and use the kinds of money set aside for capital improvements to do this kind of work. on the education fund, we have been doing [inaudible] campaign and target enforcement to users in the school system. this is funded by a couple grant fund ing sources as well as a add backs and prop k puny. it isn't a easy initiative to fund fwurkts is really important one for vision zero and when we get in the gap discussion later can dissue will talk about what the education effort can look like in 2016 squhaut it will take financially to get there. that's what we have committed,

that is what is funded in 2015 and 16. the next set of slides will cover what is not funded and what some of the funding gaps look in dollar terms and in terms of the actual scope of work that is funded by those dollars. on the education front, or engineer front. we talked about how we ued prop a and b to fund the programs that we are doing, but there follow the paving program, there is more we could do with a little more money. we have over 200 million dollars with a mix of prop b and k, 1.9. there are opportunities to fund up to 2.8 million dollars more of follow the paving construction opportunities that would allow us to build in the additional

safety and street scope for projects [inaudible] enforcement side is a small [inaudible] but it is a important one. moving-letting [inaudible] transition to hand written to e citation help all the memberoffs vision zero family agencies and be able to track and analyze sitration data and get oo handle where the dangerous [inaudible] 600 thousand dollars to cover the software, hardware implementation of a citation system. the evaluation, there is a good chunk of money secure a little over 300 thousand dollar and there is a 90 thousand dollar gap that is