hereon behalf beef of the folks the issue before you what does section 317 on 2014 it is not the date of the application that matters the date of the approval and effective on september 18th rather 2014 it was approved with regards to what mr. sanchez put in his e-mail he was refer to the consolidated permit i've added documentation in my submittal i apologize. i said that in front of you we remember in front of you in january with regard to the pending issue that is in front of you with the overarching concept the issue what does this article try to

accomplish as amended in 2014 that was making sure no loss of affordable dwelling unit and the value in march of 2012 was one .342 and the threshold was increased i'm sure you're aware of the marketed went up so by the time the merger was passed by the discretionary review the new threshold applied and the appraisals we're not asking for a waiver we can substantially apply we submitted an prevail that's not an appeal a marketing letter. >> but a period of time where the planning department said from a letter to the project sponsors architect we're not going to look at that when the

noticed of restriction the 6 months had gone the important part an appraisal was submitted that had the time period in which the planning department detailed it, in fact two months after the date and quite frankly the restrictions were after the six months and effective the planning department was saying wire fine we're looking for you to provide an appraisal that is significant the appraisal is the lynch pin of this as amended and applied by the planning commission and planning department are we losing affordable units regardless of it as shown here is his interpretation of october 9th will 2013 that would