ity hall works san francisco looks to boost transparent at the building inspection i've told them a copy please accept i mean no disrespect for the behavior of the 99 percent of the employees as dbi but if you were to visit the perez he home for 10 minutes you'll experience disbelief and drarment of what has been loudly to go forward the fair thing to order the removal of anyone stare deck since the c pe failed to constrict a review a neighborhood review as is required for decks above grade level the owners are seeking a fourth permit to legalize game

room and deck thank you for your attention to this matter. >> can we leave the article. >> any other members in support of dr requester. >> my name is christie i'm a member of ace i'm also a friend of i italy's bell and having visited their home i'm here to support their case grins the illegally structure building on monday night street it go effectively turned the home into a bad place it expanded beyond its scope and yet in 2011 the department of city planning approved over-the-counter permitted to allow it to go forward watt without the

neighborhood review they allowed the project to have a - as a result the project has wallet off two windows blocking the air light and vent e vinyllation toxic molds is in the roomed and creates a smell with impacts open the family most concern 2-year-old grand so that survivors u suffers and requires hospital visits it is clearly an emergency yet 4 years of compliments to dbi and other agencies- we have the owners are denied their fourth permit and instead ask them to dismantle

this building they have a promissory note new design it means nothing unless the structure comes down without delay any state law proposes american people unconscionable health threat and dramatically reduce the value of their home i trust the commission to do the right thing i've written comments shall i submit them. >> any other speakers in support of dr requester? >> my name is european a friend of isabel and amy i've visited their home i'm also a voter and health republican moore you might remind me i'm going to comment about bother conduct of

the city government i've observed it is to concern itself more with its public image and practicing denial than respond to the voter who elected it whether your dribble culpable or you're only culpable by association please stop it stop it they're being harmed not only mentally but physically harmed and it is your responsibility to protect them. >> first moving to the lord jesus cellist i thank god for the opportunity i'm jackie a member of ace the executive director of the italy's brooklyn

community center i'm here in support of the family they live on 59 monday night street a few blocks where i work having witnessed the problems the name has had with correcting the wrong of a roof deck that is causing health problems i request you ask the staff to go baushgd and bring a real solution to the perez family with the at do everything we can that is more than a deck health problems have been created for the family including the problems for the grandson considering that section 311 neighborhood review was not completed in the proper fashion it is obvious that something needs to be done to correct this

illegal action giving the percent family has suffered 3 years and 5 years to get to review for a compromises compromise i would suggest that the commission elevate the relationship between the d c p and the 55 3407b9 neighborhood if you saw with our eyes and smelled with our nose the condition of the perez home you with only building the d c p is suggesting what the plan before you manage it not right health of the perez family shouldn't be put in jeopardy any further the plan before you is just doesn't add up interesting is there a possibility of collusion with the facts how could the present conclusion come to this to this composition

that is hurting the perez family unless a favorism or bias i ask you investigate on the plan before you once again i'm jack wright the executive director of the community center and member of ace. >> is there any additional public comment in support of dr requester. >> okay. then project sponsor. >> your team has 5 minutes. >> hi planning commissioner i'm the son of 55 montana project and they're my parent and i'm happy to be here i finally get to know the situation with the

neighbors it was stated they were mentioning the violations but with the planning department and the planning commission to have the planning it is to have it legalized and in addition to their air water and mold on the property we have the modification to remove like set back additional 7 feet and which is right here. >> can you pull the microphone over. >> okay. so in the previous like plan right now we have it built right next to the windows they were state of the windows 33 we find out that part of the windows were illegal so then we still want to do support to make sure the neighbors were friendly

and they were less argument so we set our plans set back with 7 feet to make sure that everyone - they have their light and space and air to have like the access they need in addition to that they were saying that they don't have the like quality of life or health that can get from them they were doing a lot of things they were doing harmful to my parents by the way we have police reports they were trespassing on our property those are the copies of the police reports and in addition they've removed their fenced area to trespassing into our property to build it makes us feel uncomfortable you wake up

and someone is in like our backyard in addition their they said their windows were illegal we have proof saying they're using their windows as a way to get both the property this is the picture they were having like lards and everything to put down from the property they came into the property we tried to stop them but my parents doesn't speak english so they were coming in trying to i don't know what they trying to do it was harmful they're coming in our property like this. >> in addition to that our modification is we're already -

we've made a lot of revisions to change the plan to meet the planning code in addition to the toxins we are working hard with the planning department and they requested us to use that's why we are that using those types of materials in addition we did everything we can to meet the government and planning requests and everything we've done we're trying to comply with the planning code to make sure everything goes credible i'm so happy to present the facts what i have and what they have so i have a clear united way of what happens we were doing our surveys and have our politically u property line put the mlgdz on the ground i don't know what gives them the right to remove the medallion so we have police

come in i'd like to show you guys the picture. >> so this is the picture before they removed the medallion and after that this is the picture and the medallion is gone after that we have to call the police and the police come in and stop them and having to put back the medallion after that we finally get our safety back so we feel like more safe living in this eery know they've been living here longer but we try tour best to make a living i've been dealing with this case since i was 16 i'm trying to express as much as i can i'll leave the questions if you have comments please request. >> okay. any public comment in

support of project sponsor. >> well, i think. >> sir. >> are you the owner. >> yeah. >> i'm sorry he need to be part of the thought original 5 minutes he can respond in the two minute rebuttal not right now but have the 2 minute rebuttal okay. any public comment in support of the project sponsor. >> seeing dr requester you have a 2 minute rebuttal. >> thank you, very much thank you for this opportunity and talk about the situation at 55 and 59 movnt street this situation is complicated it has taken 5 years to progress and where is it today, today a large

deck has been built on 45 monday night it is not subject to the review process and suffered from no less than nicole's and accommodations of $16000 for legal fees she's a grandmother of 2 and she's in the scope of the project the construction has caused an under cutting of the foundation on 55 movnt this condition traets kraetsz a serious potential for failure and let's not forget within 7 inches of the south facing window that allows sunlight and air

owners at 55 monday night have managed the construction that is the construction that is - >> the results from the project has evolved as a reflexion reaction or and side effects of their action the owners of 55 montana have approximately managed the construction as the other person said and the comments of this citizenry ♪ case >> thank you. sir, your time is up. >> thank you project sponsor you have a 2 minute rebuttal i'm sorry your time is expired .

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> hi, i'm the owner of 55 montana street i'm do speak english i have an interpreter with me. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> since into custody we bought a house on monday night 55 montana street. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> we got all the permit to do that addition.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> well, every since we started to build our neighbor on the 59 movnt street have been bugging us i don't speak english he have to rely on my son and my son even took time off from school and one time from helping us i don't know there was a truancy i don't want this to happen. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> well, i've been living there for 5 years.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> so turg this few years we've received two times the letter two times from the department believable and contain we didn't live there my son had to take care of this after school speeding i did everything according to what the government the department of the government asked me to do. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> we got all the legal permit necessary i don't have much to say i really want to take care

of this matter. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> my aim is that if 59 montana think happy i feel right. i feel fine. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> well, if their happy i'm - >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the addition has think outside the box changed into 7 feet i'm fine with that. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hundred percent. >> okay. thank you public hearing portion is closed commissioner richards a question for staff can you talk about the lot line windows i'm assuming that's the large expansion area in the pop out. >> yes. >> can you determine where why

they're not legal and there's two things one a dbi compliment on the property the summary in the description pop it open the screen yeah. >> on the side it's on the top. >> can't see anything so maybe - great. >> okay. >> the description of the complaint mentioning 3 windows at the side and installed without a pmit in addition, i

found a permit that was approved in 1998 on monday night that involved the that was for the construction of their rearmost edition located. >> okay. >> i don't know if i'm loudly to show the file but the approved planned for the layout no east facing windows and only one drawings one window on that pop out i know there was a photo showing a windows located on the window facing south. >> i can show the planned. >> i guess my question the house was built in 19 hundred

i'm assuming this was a window there at some point. >> i'll show you the drawings. >> sos this was the original lay out of 8:009 mopt this is the pop out to there was no window facing east and then permit was to - >> no interruption she'll ask the questions. >> this was the original lay out for the 1998 permit this is the proposed condition so this show the plan showing the pop out no windows located on the east wall the baseline.

>> facing. >> it is in the dr. >> facing 59 movent and the layout of the thought of the 59 montana and no windows along the new edition so i think dbi looked those records and that's how i think we came to the conclusion of those windows on the east side of 59 montana being constructed. >> it's interesting i've not seen a victorian with a pop out i guess with the architects in the late 90s. >> a permit that was issued. >> to the dr requester.

>> in 19987 and this was in 1990 and it was completed. >> so no window there. >> i do not find a record. >> i'll ask the dr requester fill us in. >> can i clarify sorry. >> so the issue about the windows is existing i want to clarify because i think there is confusion where those windows are so i'm going to show what they're showing or what their referring to back in 2011 there was a complaint against the property we installed those windows that went through various people and

finally said the windows were existing back in 2011 we are still deal with those windows because it's been reopened. >> so what are you showing us. >> this is the complaint with. >> with dbi by phone we installed 3 windows at our property this is what was recorded so it went through variance they opened the case and went through it and ended up finding these windows a exist now we're here with those windows been illegal those windows i want to clarify where they are the pop out my bedroom no windows along i guess the east side. >> along the wrong side. >> there's never been windows the windows we're talking about are facing south the one in my

bedroom and right below the bathroom the east came in with the new edition he showed the plans i want to clarify no windows along the east side there never has been. >> so you can reach out and touch the wood you're talking about the south window. >> the abruptly and all 3 windows have think outside the box obstructed. >> the etc. window is a little bit confusing any more questions. >> the window there's a window downstairs. >> it is the bathroom window. >> it's a legal. >> it should be on the plan that he showed hopefully it shows there up to our knowledge their, their exist windows. >> it seems like everything jives. >> with that diagram.

>> that diagram. >> on the pop out on the east side of the pop out because i, i have confused i thought that was windows open that side you're saying there's month no windows on the east side. >> along the south. >> south facing windows they're talking about that perhaps that east window. >> not on the pop out. >> sure got it that jives with what the gentleman said mr. put are a you agree. >> yes. that's jiefdz with the plans no windows on the east side that's my confusion with the dbi those windows having that the pop out having east facing windows. >> there's american people east facing window - well it didn't show on the plan. >> okay. >> it is probably the window

that is being address under the dbi and nov. >> that's in the new edition to the house. >> yes. part of the new arithmetic. >> this is the 1998 for the arithmetic let me sorry let me zoom out this is probably confusing so an east facing window; is that correct. >> 0 so the plans don't show. >> that used to be a door that led out to our yard. >> ma'am i'm sorry you need to speak into the microphone. >> where that east window there used to be a door that led anti into our yard a landing. >> basically in that stairwell

there was a fence that was concocted down. >> so the door became a window. >> exactly those windows have been closed because they were found non-existing now 3 to 2 to 1 windows illegal i don't know where we're another. >> maybe to the zoning administrator how did the door lead to no where in the mid structure i wanted to put window instead can i put in a window. >> no under the building code it needs to be a fire rated non-operational and in these cases a requirement that if you're neighbor wants to built to the jane property line arrest the property line would pop out

basically okay. i wish you luck how that turnout with the window that had been set i wanted to get an understand of the window what happened when this deck was built let's see where do i start you you know normally we see things before you sit down normally we see things before they're built and just it by the residential guidelines, the special situations with the neighbors, etc. worker here we have an exist illegal project if it was legal we wouldn't be here i think this the pardon the person the dr requester before i go on this is not about a long guilty whether she lived there the fact your recent immigrants has noth