photograph 1 sentence one line. >> yeah. >> just putting her name in okay got it is there a motion. >> i move to approve the minutes. >> carries unanimously number 9 distributions the director's report and update of the commission staff activities. >> i don't it is late i'll not give updates but i'll answer any questions. >> any commissioners have any questions? public comment? david again, just a suggestion i wasn't at the month to month

when jessie went through a long list of initiative as has been done in the past it be with be helpful in the deputy director you and the public and anybody reading it know what's coming in the next 6 months it is subject to change so people know what is in the cue that would be helpful thanks >> i do recall asking we keep is it updated and in the loop jessie whether? in the director's report or calendar included in the report. >> okay item 10 items for future meetings? >> commissioner and at the last

meeting i mentioned i am very interested in proposals that rise the enrollment regulations help us to focus on the birthdays ticket items in a sufficient way i'm volunteering my services to help brainstorm ideas and in the next couple of meetings love to hear the progress on that. >> that's great we're doing. >> we're doing a number of things internally i think we shared some materials about the internal process. >> but before the last meeting. >> so but in terms of the like

the rags and like the procedures and the formal procedures we'll have put on the calendar you don't have unfortunate in front of you we'll not have the idea it that next month the form seven hundred electronic filings that everyone is expanding to everyone in the city and get those specialometers where we'll talk about the kind of control boat control committees and do it this august and september and the fall button buena reporting and the enforcement rec and policies at this point. >> thank you and i mentioned earlier i would like to have on the agenda for next month a report from

commissioner president keane on his review and recommendations as to what, if any action the commission should take on the issues raised on pages 23rd to thirty of the grand juries report reporting to prop j and prop e. >> with specific guidance of the chair that that the analysis of whether is pours the commission had been so changed in the 90s and whether we should. >> was it the 90s i think that was in 2000. >> 2000 and whether we should guard with a ballot measure relating to the lobbyist expenditure question and what

the wording of that ballot measure to be i'll have those any other okay. >> david again staff put out an interested party report at the end ever next month i'm looking forward to that regarding the candidate rule ballot measures and also you're next month to month will fall on memorial day so. >> i think it is down the hall thank you very much see you then. >> move to adjourn. >> (laughter). any discussion >> give me a second.

>> all in favor, say i. >> i. >>

tuesday, may 5, 2015 meeting of the san francisco unified school district sfusd please call t role and director brinkman director borden director heinecke is anticipated director nolan pr director ramos director rubke

directors ,3 3 quorum announcement of please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones planning code are prohibited at this meeting. please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. note cellular phones causes

microphone truncheons approval of the minutes of the april 21st regular meeting motion to approve . >> seconded . >> > all in favor, say i. > i. > the i's have it item 5 communications . >> members of the board anything from you . >> yes directors there will be no closed session today

>> okay and members combine items 12 and 12 or the citizens advisory committee report and back to the regular agenda okay . >> item 6 introduction of new busy . >> director rubke . >> i know how how hard our staff works i have noticed the

elevator have been un reliable and part of this is kind of bart's jurisdiction as far as the downtown elevators to function 3 distinct issues the reliability of the condition in terms of of clean ness and lighting and the agencies ability to

talk about the reliability to the public of the the elevators i'll appreciate a report open how we address those issues and how to improve all 3 . >> getting to those meetings is difficult it is a serious issue so can we get a report back

on it two weeks ? especially an action plan . >> and to ju on that

vifrnt without thinking about it contractors can park their vehicles in such a way to close

off blocks from - businesses being available sometimes, the sidewalks are not there sometimes did trucks are blocking you can't see if it's opened one business barely survived the tracking of the boulevard in front of his block and building a favorable place to park and no one told him where to park during construction that requires small business small business that the agency tasked with this job to work with the contractors and make sure that all the businesses have their needs met and finally the economically review part to see how it's impacted the street positively or in the case those are the kinds of things we've discussed in our meeting you'll see this

issue about construction and how it effects local businesses come up in a number of motions kind of the mantra yes, we like this project but what happened when the project starts our next motion is concerning elevating patrol and ticketing for cell phone use operating a moving vehicle including cars and bicycles in little enforcement section of vision zero i'm not sure this is been moved forward we we recommend it be part of the statistics collected next this concerns van ness avenue and the plan to eliminate a number of left turn lanes during and after construction motion reads as follow whereas

the sfmta has already decided to remove all but two left turn lanes and whereas the sfmta has on modeled the impacts of this decision on traffic but has not conducted an actual survey by actually closings the lanes thereof we recommend you close those lanes accordingly to our models that will work but sometimes models are not accurate enough to really get the prediction right and that way you'll have a test and figure out what to do when trouble it's not that that will but perfectly suited to the conditions finally this concerns the van

ness brt project cac recommendations staff work with existing businesses along van ness avenue to mitigate the facts of theirprogram and all those things about how construction effects the businesses on the street our play into this one as well questions >> director ramos. >> i appreciate the concern around small businesses during construction that is something that agency is set up for supporting the businesses and as we've seen with the central subway the thing i have a concern around the support for businesses after constructions and recognizing the limitation that some of us or some funding i should say we have with

respect with the money we have to for example a lot of funding for the brt projects from mined is from the fta and that pounding it restricted with with respect to how it can be used and challenging to use funds for transportation dollars for economic development after a project has been implemented and so i'll encourage our committee to really conducted a rigorous explanation of funding sources for supporting those businesses after the prestigious are implemented it is a noble endeavor there you are concern colors of money so to speak concern dollars for certain things i understand the money for the brt project can't be

used for projects after it has been implement if i can make that request. >> we don't have staff unfortunately but certainly we're looking at that my understanding of the long term economic issues is whether or not the construction has changed the situation on the street and in a negative way instead of a positive way because of changes that were made for example, eliminating parking spaces or doing other things that don't seem to be working on the street is it so my understanding that is the important part of it not to take over an oewd function of the success of that street but that if the agency and the design that was executed and built has missed something somewhere a way

to correct the mistakes i'm not sure you've got money for that but that's the prime thing nobody expects you to be primarily responsible for the development in the neighborhood i would think i'll bring that message back to the cac. >> the motion we're on the on the same page especially a clarifying our last meeting we're definitely working together on that one. >> we're on the record we're saying an environmental impact report looking at the things and the refinement of the issues that will take under advisement the issues are not necessarily financial issues but the busses and bus stations to do advertise for example for the businesses and things like that it is not

always around money but the enforcement once the improvement are in people parking too long at meter but the point the economic impact what the issues should be specific to the role our agencies plays with what we have not as mr. weaver said not the economic development arm for the neighborhood we don't have the ability that is fair, i think that the key with the studies will be looked at short term and long-term obviously when traffic patterns in the beginning upcoming people evaluated for patterns during construction and reevaluate digging out the reiterations and looking at things to tell and looking at what types of things to be murder and the issue of our job enforcement and

generally the assets. >> thank you, again, for all the fine work and the recommendations that come out of the advisory committee. >> mr. chairman you'll asked 33 me to call 11 to increase the airport for taxicab trips for sfo from two to $4 and item 12 authorized the director to have the wave of the 2016 for medallions and fiscal year relationship a card renewable fees for all taxicabs drivers. >> good afternoon. >> hi good afternoon kate with the taxis and assessable services for item 11 the sfo trips that a driver may charge a driver from two to $4 sfo

charges the taxicab drivers for trips originally at sfo and currently $2 and the airport commission approved an increase in the trip fee dollars in may effective january one 2015 to sfo has not implemented the fees in the trips cost research staff is requesting an increase from two to $4 to pass into the customers and one important things in the context the taxis again only pay the fees on the picks up not the drop out and the t c p-385 that fee will