did you want it is automatic. >> no motion any supervisor can duplicate. >> commissioner chan but before we do this should we address the amendments. >> the motion by supervisor tang has been accepted and accepted unanimous by this committee that motion pauses i request to did you want the items one and two and to the call of the chair. >> to talk about others maximums we'll do separate legislation and the duplicate file in committee any amendments we'll do a substitute legislation for the files in committee and refer that to say planning commission contaminate so this is in the precluding to the call of the chair supervisor

tang our legislation from moving forward. >> city attorney. >> sure this is probably getting spur technical but a couple of suggests are that. >> substitute can only be suggested by engine. >> unless the sponsoring changes, of course at any point a supervisor can introduce a new legislation on this topic the other piece one a committee amends an ordinance it can't be substitute can't be introduced so i suggest that the motion to amend supervisor tang made that applies only to the version our send out the original duplicate file in his orange form and if supervisor tang wants a substitute >> that's fine anything in the future we talk about the future

amendments that supervisor tang made and supervisor tang any last words. >> that's fine the one amendment i read into the record we shouldn't do you want that today. >> you should disappointed that are to the version but not the duplicate version. >> here's what i want to recommend madam chair we send the vote and we'll resend it and i'll make a motion reduplication of the foil and move to continue the duplicate file to the call of the chair and then proceed with the original version. >> okay. so all right. may i have a motion to resend the vote all right. motion by supervisor wiener and sect by commissioner chan motion passes amazing is there a motion i can entertain on the floor

supervisor wiener. >> so requesting the duplicate the foils for 1235e and duplicate the files to the call of the chair. >> okay. that it didn't need a vote. >> to the call of the chair requires a vote. >> so motion to move it passed unanimously by this body thank you very much okay now. >> supervisor tang's amendment we can make to the. >> supervisor tang could you. >> resate our motion. >> i previously stated the technical amendment and make a motion 80 motion to amend that to the full board. >> can we accept this unanimously. >> thank you very much ladies and gentlemen, that will democracy in action.

>> a motion to recommend- >> we'll pull this out of committee to the full board with a with a positive recommendation so through the chair for the original version to send it to the full board for items 12wr5e. >> this motion passes unanimously thank you very much madam clerk item 3. >> a resolution there the zoning district controls for the medical cannabis dispensary and judy and neighborhood commercial districts. >> thank you ladies and gentlemen, supervisor tang is also the author to a presentation. >> item 3 a speaking to correct some changes made to the planning code and had unat the end circumstances on other previous legislation previously in the 4 neighborhood commercial

district in district 4 i've you didn't and others it was required a requirement in the planning code that any inactivity increasing must go through a conditional use process there are new requirements for the medical cannabis dispensary one irresponsibly the transparency on the empowering that rechld with that change removed the medical cannabis dispensaries from the definition of inactivity use now an activist use changing the legislation that of passed by the form supervisor and we're looking to correct that clean up legislation to require it put in mass interim zoning district controls for conditional use authorization in medical cannabis dispensary for the 4 neighborhood commercial districts i'm available to

answer any questions and planning staff is here. >> seeing no questions from the colleagues, any presentations no problem public comment on item 3 is open please if you have a comment please come forward. >> i'm paul good afternoon. >> good afternoon. >> the code was very clear that that was permitted with a discretionary review it seems to me my name is it was a stretch that it would require a conditional use because it wasn't listed on a certain table even though is yftd as an active use there was a conditional use hearing skeleton for august 10, '10 device it went into effect it was already a clarification i would beg to defer not an

inadvertent thing but an institutional health care use an active use and defined on the table i know that there is a lot of controversy in the sunset district regarding and people are passions national and vocal but the patience of the sunset deserve it the interim controls are for to be used when this year's an urgent need for this i think there is more of an urgent need for the patients in the sunset there are a number of establishments that most of the people in sunset have never been in for instance, a synagogue but there are many there are so i strongly size we stay with the way that the code is written for the rest of the city and not make exception for the rigorous

commissions thank you very much. >> thank you very much any public comment on item 3 seeing none, public is closed thank you supervisor tang is there anything else. >> first of all, i don't appreciate any insimulation of upgraded acts i stand by what i stated i addressed something changed through previous legislation with that, i'm going to recommend to the economy members to forward out item 3 i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> supervisor tang has made a motion and seconded by i'm sorry. >> do we have a committee report. >> i apologize. i amend that motion to be sent forward with a with a positive recommendation with a report before we take that vote supervisor wiener. >> thank you madam chair, i want to be clear that this the

conditional use wiped away i'll take full responsibility for f that i ponder on behalf of planning department a broad code clean up that this board passes is a month or two ago code clears up are complicated a 5 heed page ordinance with an enormous amount of changes with we do code cleans up that is rare at some point vicinity change something with different parts of codes enacts with some things this happened a few years ago when i asked a board code conversion and clean up and it tirnt wiped out a control we

didn't intend to wipe away so they weigh this was not our intent to impact the issues in the sunset so what everyone is viewing whether there's a conditional use it is appropriate to restore the existing control. >> thank you commissioner wu supervisor tang has made a motion to move forward this the full board seconded by supervisor wiener and unanimously passed by this body madam clerk call item 4. >> a hearing to review the housing resources program and options for the rent control housing. >> so colleagues this item is sponsored by supervisor christensen i've received a request to continue this many stakeholders were intending to present open the housing group

meeting but brown before we entertain a motion any munoz that want to speak on item 4 please come forward. >> good afternoon. i'm marla from the north beach tenants committee i'm happy to participate in this hearing it's almost a non-hearing isn't it in 2013 i along with 21 other neighbors were evicted under the ellis act this is on one block on the street tatted there was no placed to go and still no place to go i went to padding lemon and got an a waiting list and still i'm on the list

ellis acts are once again up in north beach and the rest of the city after a hiatus and other leases i'd like to see one that pieces be put in the enforcement of short term rental law those units are being taken out of the housing stock and being illegally represented and that means the at that time, from the airbnb this is going to continue to happen i'd like to see the small sites program expanded it is i think this is much better to have housing that is here and keep it retain it much faster and people want to stay within

thorough homes and like to see real landlords not speculators landlord regarded for not vogt people i'm a volunteer person at telegraph hill center and like to see my community stay intact. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >> other members that want to speak i'm sorry you've spoken already we have to continue. >> yes. good afternoon, supervisors just to echo what the previous speaker said it is incumbent that on the city to really take this issue seriously and implement measures that will retain and will keep people

housed seniors and particular seniors with sdanlts people would go disabilities are vulnerable we're seeing a spike in no fault to fault evictions tenants are being duped out of their long term rent controlled units and for lack of knowledge resources into educating folks will their rights and that i am going to keep them out of harm's way to they don't suffer eviction an undue revocation and the short-term rentals there are 5 thousand of those unregulated short-term rentals that are going on in san francisco many of which are fall under the rent control stoke and that's a great

importance to our organization you know we're on a mission to really educate folks and get people aware of their rights but the candletion of the rental stock is acquit troubling we note a reverse and our organization position we're in favor of the concept of aging in place folks should be able to acknowledge in their homes and not put in rest homes and care facilities and that's it thank you. >> thank you very much seeing no other members of the public that want to comment on this item number 4 public comment is closed. colleagues a motion to continue this to the call of the chair. >> so moved. >> thank you made and supervisor tang and sending by supervisor wiener this month unanimously madam clerk, any other business

before this committee? there's no further business. >> thank you. this meeting is adjourned tuesday, may 5, 2015 meeting of the san francisco unified school district sfusd please call t role and director brinkman

director borden director heinecke is anticipated director nolan pr director ramos director rubke directors ,3 3 quorum announcement of please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones planning code are prohibited at this meeting. please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room

of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a cell phone, pager, or other similar sound-producing electronic devices. note cellular phones causes microphone truncheons approval of the minutes of the april 21st regular meeting motion to approve . >> seconded . >> > all in favor, say i. > i. > the i's have it item 5

communications . >> members of the board anything from you . >> yes directors there will be no closed session today >> okay and members combine items 12 and 12 or the citizens advisory committee report and back to the regular agenda okay . >> item 6 introduction of new busy

. >> director rubke . >> i know how how hard our staff works i have noticed the elevator have been un reliable and part of this is kind of bart's jurisdiction as far as the downtown elevators to function 3

distinct issues the reliability of the condition in terms of of clean ness and lighting and the agencies ability to talk about the reliability to the public of the the elevators i'll appreciate a report open how we address those issues and how to improve all 3 . >> getting

to those meetings is difficult it is a serious issue so can we get a report back on it two weeks ? especially an action plan . >> and to ju on that

vifrnt without thinking about it contractors can park their vehicles in such a way to close off blocks from - businesses being available sometimes, the sidewalks are not there sometimes did trucks are blocking you can't see if it's opened one business barely survived the tracking of the boulevard in front of his block and building a favorable place to park and no one told him where to park during construction that requires small business small business that the agency tasked with this job to

work with the contractors and make sure that all the businesses have their needs met and finally the economically review part to see how it's impacted the street positively or in the case those are the kinds of things we've discussed in our meeting you'll see this issue about construction and how it effects local businesses come up in a number of motions kind of the mantra yes, we like this project but what happened when the project starts our next motion is concerning elevating patrol and ticketing for cell phone use operating a moving vehicle including cars and bicycles in little enforcement section of vision zero i'm not sure this is been moved

forward we we recommend it be part of the statistics collected next this concerns van ness avenue and the plan to eliminate a number of left turn lanes during and after construction motion reads as follow whereas the sfmta has already decided to remove all but two left turn lanes and whereas the sfmta has on modeled the impacts of this decision on traffic but has not conducted an actual survey by actually closings the lanes thereof we recommend you close those lanes accordingly to our models that will work but sometimes models are not accurate enough to really get

the prediction right and that way you'll have a test and figure out what to do when trouble it's not that that will but perfectly suited to the conditions finally this concerns the van ness brt project cac recommendations staff work with existing businesses along van ness avenue to mitigate the facts of theirprogram and all those things about how construction effects the businesses on the street our play into this one as well questions >> director ramos. >> i appreciate the concern around small businesses during construction