>> we'll call the meeting the historic preservation commission welcome and welcome to the historic preservation commission regular meeting for may 20th 2015 disruptions of any kind. proceedings. and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. like i environmental impact report at this time mr. byrd commissioner hasz and

commissioner matsuda that expected to be absent first on your junked is public comment please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones code please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person(s) responsible for the ringing or use of a applying if you have the one speaker card richard and good afternoon commissioners my name is rishtd rothman i want to talk about measure rallies mile favorite subject the commission the assessment started on the building at the zoo and hopefully, we'll on houch that will cost and to reopen the building the murals

except for that the western wall they look fantastic and the other issue the skubtd mural the george washington high school that makes the coit tower the most concentration of the murals is at george washington it is not national landmark so working with supervisor eric mar's and heritage and your staff we can bring this about and fix up those about how far murals and get the recognition that those mural rallies deserve any outlet madam clerk, any other business before this committee? member of the public that twoishz addresses the commission public comment is closed. >> commissioner department

matters director announcements. >> good evening tim frye department staff what is included in your you packet happy to answer questions but if you don't then that that concludes my report. >> item two review of past vents staff report and announcements. >> good afternoon commissioner tim frye a few updates share with you for this weeks ago reports 901 tennessee as you recall this economy approved this within the dog patch recently this was on april 15th of this year project sponsor has lebtd to reduce or increase the size of the courtyard at the rear yard about 5 feet to address some

exposure issues and it's proximity to an adjacent neighborhood that can change awhile a modification to our approval will not change the unit mix our the appearance of the project from the public right of ways the commission the planning commission continued the item so the project sponsor can address this revision and that will be heard tomorrow it is in the intent of our approval we wanted to bring your attention and rim the commission there is a portion of article 10 awhile it is not used ouch that is there that states to the planning commission may might have the certificate of province by this commission through a 2/3rd's vote along that c of a only to

contributors or within the lifework this is 10067 point e if you have mississippi e questions i'll be happy to give you an overview but give you an update on>> thank you. next speaker, please. >> and let you know how the commission weighs in on it form tomorrow secondly an update based on a request by this commission in regards to tennessee street as you recall at our last hearing mr. alumni as provided additional documents on this property that raised several concerns new information about the properties insight history

during the ceqa analysis and two this commission has not reviewed professional for demolition and a at this site we looked at the record for the property and the entitlement society i pass out the historic resource preservation review form just. >> few minutes ago and copies online for the public if they're interested it indicates we've rectified the property and found it a contributor to a thirsted industrial it is a ceqa not the dog patch district the subject property is outside of the dog patch landmark district that being said that is outing outside of the certificate of appropriation that's why the commission didn't

review that, and, secondly, the project did consider historic resource new it's second analysis indicated in the form i passed out to you our understanding those ceqa impacts were take into consideration during the rectify of the project and the planning commission approved the project including the ceqa finding at on october 2014 hearing to the project has been approved that are other appeal routes should mr. alumni nasal or another member of the public have concerned we feel that staff accurately addressed the issues in the context of this commission certainly happy to look at both is it a little bit more if you have very specific questions. >> i have one question you know it seems like having lived in the dog patch for many

years i don't remember exactly where the boundary of the district i seem to remember it is part of that that are not attached that are not quite attached the building direction across the street is the red building that is close to the creek park. >> mr. alumni mass highlighted the location in red as part of that it is a little bit deceiving where it end that's why from the map it appears it's a contributor by, in fact, a contributor to a much larger ceqa eligible district from the ceqa prospective when we that look at the demolition of one

contributor not a significant impact if removing one building from a much larger building from the contributor were unique or multiple contributors for dog that's requires a different level of analysis okay. thank you last thing to mention to you is the certified local government annual report draft will be e-mailed to you by the end of the day ideally submit this to the city of in the interest of time we decided not to prepare a presentation or overview of the report to this year as many of the items haven't changed that is a reporting requirement for our c l g status if there wish

additional trainings to report let us know if you have an updated resume forward that otherwise we'll use the resumes we currently have on file the one section i will bring your attention that we would appreciate some input at the end it outlines how the department achieved the goals for the previous year i'm happy to report we've either achieved those or working diligently to achieve those goals and have made progress we've craft new goals that are directly in line with the commissions focus on the society heritage continue to improve the ceqa process to 3w4r06r9 our line program and exposure option

at the citywide survey their sxhcht with previous years that's why we zits a form presentation is not necessary please give us your input and let us know that concludes any comments unless you have questions. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we'll move on to commissioner matters that concludes my report and announcements. >> no report. >> item 4 consideration of minutes drafts for the draft minutes for the harvey milk club hearing of april 15, 2014. >> echo can we take those both together i move we adapt both of them. >> question. >> and we have to ask the public on the historic preservation commission minutes for april the

architect for 901 tennessee was writing written as pick up letter with a p not a t and i don't know minor thing. >> any public comment on item the minutes there that being said. >> back to you, commissioners. i are you new to approve as amended on that motion. >> commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner pearlman and schneider so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 4 to zero and place you on item 5 commissioners questioning. >> questions or comments so there was a fabulous

extraordinarily worthwhile and conference the california planning association in san diego recently there were many things that were worth noting but the two of them in particular mr. fry mepgsdz the citywide safer this could save san francisco one million dollars of money or truckloads of money the city of los angeles is doing the citywide survey in connection with the gert museum the software they've developed for use in that compressors are available as open software that is to say free and i know there are a number we had a number of representatives there and i'm sure they'll be follow-up on that but that could solve a plethora of things

you'll frequently when we're discussing mitigation we ask a plaque or something like that placed outside a building that's been altered in order to provide convenient history it is in my opinion an utterly unsatisfactory solution but the city of riverside has working with a small company in order and they've developed an app which all of the information maybe placed so it is vegetationly only recalling by someone walking down the street who sees an indication that this is an important building i understand that the landmarks

or buildings or plaques part of the program can be searched and organized if one point to take the tour of those important things they can do that and as they went around the sign onto app so i don't bring the information but talked to several of our people on our staff about ann it afterward and have confidence we'll use with the city of riverside developed and any other questions. >> i have a question about the june 3rd hearing there was nothing on the calendar yet i don't know if anything, it going to be on it. >> we'll take that up at the time we top continuance but staff is in the provided me with

anything for june 3rd they been an opportunity to cancel the hearing. >> i wanted to respond if i may to this point will the plaques because i have suggested that projects include those i wasn't necessarily thinking of them as an litigants but as an informative display but one the things i want to mention i took a photo of one plaque that was recently installed on the cigar factory it has it's process eased consciousness as design but for information i mean f it captures our attendance for someone walking by that's the

whole purpose and so at some point we may want to agendize or look at you know maybe vice chair having more of a template or ideas because it was the right size you could read it three or four sentences so those are my thoughts thank you for that information. >> commissioners just to quickly respond we appreciate your comments and we've heard our comments prior about the desire for a pot program and just wanted to update you and let you know we're going telegraph hill still working on a plaque program for a template to provide property owners and we hope to bring that to you soon definitely with this within this year ideally this summer for a design you'll approve and help

to fascinate the vendor and permitting process for the property owners for all landmark buildings. >> i want to make a suggestion. >> commissioners if i may as a worthy conflict of discussion this is not on our agenda and grown into a discussion would caution us not to proceed any further. >> perhaps something for june the third. >> (laughter). perhaps there you go >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we can move on to consideration of items proposed for continuance. item 67 for case at the civilian center inventory is proposed for august 5th and commissioners future under our regular

calendar at great highway the golden gate park certificate of province we will not been able to up or sustain a quorum due to the absents and recusal of the chair i recommend you include that for items for continuance we don't have anything on june 3rd we can continue to june 3rd or 7 by 7 when or when we have more items >> i move we continue those items. >> schon we should probable take public comment. >> thank you is there a member of the public that worries about to address the commission on those two items? >> i know that it was not on the agenda about the plaques -

ma'am, i'm sorry this is only for the items proposed for continuance that's okay. well, there isn't. >> close public comment. >> so i move we continue those two items until june. >> the civic center is to ugly fifth and the flowers to june. >> can i ask a question. >> second. >> i wanted to ask a question for the conservative if did the extra two weeks present a problem well, the additional two weeks from june 3rdrd. >> preservation staff the project sponsors were told about the continuance can't speak for themselves i can't comment we've

had the application for about a year. >> so another month (laughter). >> commissioners there is a motion and a second to continue to august 5th and june. >> commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner pearlman and schneider so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 4 to zero and places you under our regular calendar for item 7 on stereotyping street certificate of province he will commissioners again, the project before the commission is the proposal to build a one story office and conference room at the northwest corner of the rehabilitation property that occupies 3 lots open fell street

and steiner it contains a 3 story ottawa i can designed by charles and built by peter in 1891 we a smaller lot that powers to be the original stable building for the residents for the mansion on the corner and two-story italian this is the building as at germany heart building the now constructed building is cornice is slightly visible between the two historic buildings because of the property location the rear yard the pardon must seek approval of a variance it will be scheduled once the province for the

historic district the commission is recommend with conditions to retain the historic building and we find that the proposed locations is appropriate the rear yard is creatorsy building on the new lot and constructed in a grouping of other structures the new building is also designed and compatible with the differentiated manner in a slithering revised style but different from the queen ann adjacent to it the new buildings primer facade is wood los angeles police department advisory committee a parapet and porch wood frame and double hung windows with the

architecture period of surrounding buildings and the simplicity will distinguish this this as well as the hard i didn't cladding on the secondy facade which are not visible from the public right-of-way and last the massing will be subordinate to the larger residents on the 3 lots conditions we're reverend the project sponsor shall present the materials for review and approval by the planning department staff prior to the permit approval and second the project sponsor shall match the finish of the fiber cement siding to match the proposed wood los angeles police department advisory committee on the all of the evidence and since the packets i've received 3 letters from the neighbors

they oppose the project generally they seem concerned with the disruption to open space and within the historic district they also raised concerns about noticing i want to clarify we have checked with the mail and posted nos their compliant there was also a preapplication it is a separate requirement if the appropriateness requirement held between the last 9 months i'm going to turn it over to the project sponsor to describe the project in detail i'm available for questions. >> pardon a presentation of 10 minutes. >> good afternoon. i'm louie i'm the chair of the board of housing for the recovery systems our executive director and architect maybe stuck if traffic thank you very much for your

time we very much appreciate it one of the most important public policy issues and certainly one the most important public health issues in the city and county of san francisco is the fact we have literally thousands of people living and dying on our streets affixed by the chemicals and mentally ill and many cases a combination of both all the recovery programs to exist to go something about this problem we do so with no government funding and the reason we have asking for the construction of this building so increase the advocacy of our effort right now if our 2 eight day rehab program the categorize are held in the living room of the rehab facility that is not an atmosphere that is conducive to

learning and adds to the cluster of that facility we're attempting to build a second clamor we think that has a minimal impact on the site and neighborhood and on the architecture heritage but that's the punch we're requesting construction secondly, i'd like we've done our best to be a proper set the record straight of the heritage we've been through a capital campaign of which i was a part we raised $250,000 to repair the queen ann structure to paint it with a new roof in one hundred years ago or years 5 layers of roofing we reparched and tore off the roof we repaired the the

structures within our budget and redid the sclairpz and repaired did sidewalks on steiner and installed the streetscaping we've done a great deal to preserve it thirdly by the do our best to be a good neighbor we've attempted to respond to every complaint we've had at any time about the operation and tolerant no misbehavior by our clients we exist for people that want to stop the downhill slides to insanity or the streets by behavior if they demonstrate we don't tolerated the misbehavior more wish to cause inconvenience to the neighbors the people that are objecting to this project

wish to keep it as open space the building is actually less high than the fenced that spratsd united states from the neighbors that means the impact it they live on 2 hundred and two square feet from the rear of our residence that's the balance and on the other side it is the increased efficiency of the program if you compare those our projects should be approved thank you for your time and i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> does that include our presentation does our architect want to make - >> i'm arlene the executive director to the recovery program and the project sponsor i'll add to his description to the classroom it is for the current clients a smaller program than

takes place in the henry loft house a bigger facility we're limited to capacity of 11 beds in had program we have a few clients that council treatment clients don't spend the night we're talking about the average of 12 to 13 clients using this classroom it is very small structure and you know they right now they're just using this one living room they can't use the main thousand a separate program and closing classes happening in that building throughout the day that is spate from those folks. >> thank you. >> any commissioners have any questions. >> opening it up for public comment. >> i have a couple of speaker card