driving two cars every day with a million extra people coming here, you are looking at 800,000 vehicles on our roads and highways so, what is theling whiage of those vehicles, to greenhouse gasses and climate? 40% of our criteria unhealthy pollutants i talked about, and 30% greenhouse gas inventory, comes from these vehicles -- in terms of regional policy for emissions reduction, we have 15% per capita emissions reduction, in greenhouse gasses, set for 2030 been our metropolitan transportation, commission -- targeting, 80% reduction, in greenhouse gasses, by 2050 below

19/90 levels -- electric vehicles, are the key to us achieving those goals, in terms of taking a look at what that means in raw numbers, that means by the year 2020 we need over 100,000 vehicles on the road 0 emission vehicles and by 2,025,250,000 vehicles. so where are we relative to those numbers today? the bay area represents 38% of california's total electric vehicle sales that means, the marketplace here is 10% of the national sales of vehicles, even with those numbers we're 1% of the total vehicle fleet here in the bay area, right now, with the electric vehicles the 37,000 number represents the eb rebates, we think there is another 20% on top of that we

can add, so we're some where around 50,000 vehicles, in this region, in the year 2015 needing to go to 250,000 or more. so what has to happen to get us there? there is a huge regional eb infrastructure here. there is lots of stakeholders, we got electricity providers, we got vehicle manufacturers, all of these groups work together quite well, to foster, electric vehicles, and to move the cause of 0 emissions vehicles forward. if i boil it down to 4, 5, maybe six things maybe more than that that we could do i would say that, you know the price of the vehicles, and charging has to come down, people will not buy these vehicles unless they're

cost competitive, we can do that with incensive dollars, but with the board of manufacturers, when i'm in the room with them, i remind them the price needs to come down roland mentioned the multifamily dwelling issue, that is something we need to solve, we need to put a lot of work into. to be quite honest in the bay area we're 50% multifamily, and 50% single residences if i get the 50% that are single perezes, i'm pretty happy, we can't lose sight of that either. but multifamily is an issue. we need to deal with equity at the air district we set aggressive goals for our investments, we invest about $80 million, a year, in technologies, to reduce emissions, our board set a tar get get for the reductions 50%

need to be impacting communities, those are the worst hit by pollution, poverty, and other criteria here in the bay area. a couple of other things, work place charity, very important for smaller vehicles for what we call the light duty passenger vehicles they act as a show place for achieving our goals if i was to talk to the city from san francisco, for a second, awhat you all could do i think it's very important we havy koe friendly building and zoning laws adopting ordinances to require, electric vehicle stub outs in multifamily, and single family dwellings, buildings in major renovations as well don't lose that opportunity, that is something that is important to do, i think in terms of your own

fleet, more electric vehicles in the city fleet would definitely send the message, they're visible, folks see them, they're something you should all be thinking about. lucky enough we have money to help you one of the things i mentioned about our agencieses we provide grant funding, we are responsible for the deployment of 200 of the public infrastructure, charity stations, here in the bay area. that is the national net, a lot of them came to san francisco, we provided to get people confident, they could go out and buy electric vehicles we have deployed about 1400 chargers, in residential homes, and we take data from that to learn how about electric vehicles are used. coming up, we're going to invest about $14 million, to the electric vehicle space. currently

opened opening this week is our infrastructure program, that is to provide additional incensives, for those places for multifanlly dwellings, because we recognize they're an issue, we have incentives, for public fleets for light duty vehicles but we are adding incensives for healthy duty buses, transportation, we will open that program wider so not only can public fleets participate in it. we want to see private fleets ov three or more take advantage of that funding, other sources of funding, i think you should be aware of. we mentioned that all forms of transportation needs to be electrified, meet the goals of 5

and 700,000 vehicles. -- you will see a concerted effort to go over the hed heavy duty sector, over the next 2-3 years, with our ports, and heavy duty centers, one area we're excited about, fr the first time the air district, and it's partners, will be participating in the vehicle retirement program -- we run the most successful retirement vehicle program in the country, period. that is things other air districts, in the state can do which is provide incentives for folks, to purchase electric vehicles, we're hoping this year, we will be able to participate in that program it will be something, we're really

excited about. other things we're doing, we're helping to support planning for local cities and governments, we provided a million dollar grant for the state of california so communities can have pev readiness programs, that is something i know bob is well aware of as cities, and counties, move forward, and think about infrastructure, in the deployment of vehicles, we're also through that plan developed a lot of training educational resources, model ordinances, those types of things and engaged in programs on education and outreach. we have also been working on development of tools, for folks, who own multifamily dwellings, and folkses that are interested in seeing electric infrastructure in them. i wanted to leave you with people to help you because i can't. these are the names of the folk

you need to know in around these ar i can't say on charging, and infrastructure and our program manager, karen is known for these vehicles thank for your attention, i look forward to your questions. [applause]. >> good evening. thank you commissioners for having me here to inviting me to speak to you all, i'm looking down at my nails right now, i'm realizing, i need to get them done now i need to make sure i combo to a healthy nail salon, i appreciate the work you are doing. my name is sekita grant i'm

legal counsel, at the green lining institute. those that are not familiar, we're a social justice, nonprofit, we work to bring economic advancement opportunities, for communities, of color without california. today, i will talk to you guys about how do we build in equity to policy making,particular loo around the environment and energy and clean air with the understanding we have exciting goals, we need to reach around climate change it's important that all californian's, are able to benefit from these programs and we proceed, i will be focusing on the transportation sector, and electric vehicles, as we transfer from a fossil fuel dependant economy, to a cleaner transportation economy with electric vehicles we want to make sure there are economic

students available for low income communities, what we look at this we first want to understand the problem, we have disproportional impacts on communities of color, communities of color are hit first and worst by environment issues, whether you are talking about -- super standing in new york you have the vulnerable po populations, are communities of color, right now, they're improving, but insufficient to address equity concerns, we have disadvantaged communities, that are not represented in the decision making process, that is impacting them and there is lack of access to green jobs.

so as we approach these problems, we lead first with improvement public health and air quality for communities of color, again, we want to focus on long term sustainable investments, green color jobs in these communities, these last two bullets i will be speaking to the most as they're addressing the equity piece of these issues as we do our work we work quite a bit at the state level in sacramento. there say couple of priorities we have when we engage policy makers first is the employment gap, and equity. the second is how do we make clean technologies access to to all californian's, and third is

the diversity in the economy. we talked about the cap and fund trade, we see sb 535, is a policy that requires 25% of funding from the cap and trade program benefit what is referred to as disadvantaged or under solved communities, and 10% of the funds go directly to those communities, just to unpack that a little bit more here, the list of sb 535, 2014 slr 13 funding, in this cycle. $272, going to direct funding, the proposed budget is at

2.237 billion, which might be more, we might be looking at 2.7 billion, to be finalized in june that results in 160 million that will go to disadvantaged communities, i have taken a snapshot that focuses on the transportation we're looking at 1.5 million, 25% of that will go to benefitses disadvantaged communities. so i'm going to spend the most time here, which is how do we make clean energy technologies available, specifically, around electric vehicles i'm charge of the head of koe aligs for senate bill 725, to make sure these technologies, are accessible to communities of

colors. i won't get into this too much. this slide is just to point out that transportation is our largest contributor to climate change at 38% of emissions, and dirty air from emissions, disproportionally impact, low income areas of color, that are at risk of asthma cancer and other pollution-related illnesses. accelerating the shift to electric cars will improve the health for all californians while cutting emissions. senate bill 1275, sets a goal of reaching 1 million electric vehicles, in ten years -- increasing access to disadvantaged communities, we're doing this in several ways first is equity is clean vehicle

rebates, which damian mentioned on one of his slides that this state subsidizes the electric vehicle program, to make sure low and moderate income communities, are receiving a higher incensive amount than others it will also set an income cap level, so wealthy individuals, don't have access to this because they can afford to purchase electric vehicles without it. there is increased financing options, there is a request proposal right now, by the california resources board how we can create a financing structure that will furthereder increase access, to low and moderate income individual, there is also car sharing programs, and pie lat programs that are starting around that

charging stations, and multifamily dwelling buildings, is a big issue, as head for charge coalition, there say cash for clunkierses program, which is really focused quite a bit on the south coast and the central valley at this point because of the really bad air quality out there, we're looking for ways to ensure that it's accessible throughout -- it already is accessible throughout california, but there is additional funding for those areas, because of the poor air quality, and mobility options turning in a clunkier instead of necessarily buying a new vehicle, you can get some rebates towards public transportation. this is where we are with some of the solicitations out currently, i mentioned the financing assistance program, that is up to $1.5 million, that

will go to help with financing, the purchasing of new and leased electric vehicles that should be finalized some time this summer. this month, we have a car sharing pilot program, for disadvantaged communities that will provide up to 2.5 million for clean air car sharing programs, which will come out may 27th. is the emfp the cash for clunkiers program, we will have a kick off in san francisco, next week, as this rolls out. and the next is the income cap and equity proigs vision there is $1.5 million that will go towards that, that will roll out some time in the fall and winter. so another piece of this which i will go through quickly as we

look at our transition to a clean energy economy, it's important to ensure all economies, have access to the economy that is emerging in california today, we have over -- working in energy solar power and related fields we have people of color, representing 60% of california how do we make sure this is representative of the diversity here in california? supplier diversity and inclusive hiring are very important touch points, that green lining focuses on. what this slide represents is the strategies around increasing diversity in sectors, such as the clean energy economy, ensuring it's representative of california diversity, also of

course competition and transparency, we want more people applying for these jobs, and trained in these new technology, so there is increased competition, so there is a robust and diverse hiring pool for this new economy, the supplier diversity which is really, what businesses are getting the contracts? we're making sure minority owned, women owned and lgbt and veterans programs those are under served, to have access to these types of contracts, once company, are contracting to do this work, who are they hiring? spending money around low income communities, we want to make sure folks are hiring from those communities, and the economic ben tit

-- beb benefits for the economies, are involved. what is next for all of you folks in the room to become educated, and push through policies, that are beneficials to all californian's. thank. [applause] >> amazing presentations. thank you everybody. questions discussion? comments from the commission? you know. i will wait. commissioner stephenson? >> i have a few questions, in terms of the incensives, we're

talking about getting people to purchase electric vehicles i can't remember i think it was your point about the costs coming down. how close to the incensives get to offsetting the differentuation between an electric and nonelectric vehicle right now? >> in the studies we have looked at there is energy density we're looking at basically, the cost of a total combustion engine vehicle, is $100 per kilowatt hours, edwif lent sea, for battery, is $100, per kilowatt hours so the difference between -- vehicle is

offset substantially by the grants that are currently available, if we take a regular vehicle, by comparison -- we have done this as part of our plan -- with the grants and incentives, they come down with 5-$7,000 in termses of purchase price, and the difference between regular vehicle and one of these vehicles but that's about the amount right. in terms of leases because the vehicles need these vehicles to meet the regulatory requirements, the lease deals on these vehicles are pretty incredible. i'm not doing car commercials, but [laughter]. i think you could quite comfortably, in the city of san francisco, lease a 2-3 year lease on an ev for under $200 a

month. which is roughly, by comparison an ice equivalent 100-$200 less >> what is the price differential filling my car with electricity, versus filling it with oil? >> we compare them? >> it's a quarter of the price to fill it. thank you. >> just to channel commissioner king for a second. he used to talk about the dynamic that was in everybody's presentation around multifamily tenants, and folks that are in multifamily units, i didn't have a car for a long time my wife and i started having kids and can't be biking the infant around certainly not two of them.

maybe one. so we're looking at ev's. and the big question there not to plug we were looking for a union made american automobile and looking at ford, semacs and chevy volt. semacs are getting 18 miles on the charge. there is no parking which there shouldn't be. but the options there are find someone someone that will rent us a garage, for 250 bucks to lease it. which becomes a ka none drum -- it starts to bay solution for folks like me and commissioner king used to talk about a lot. as you get more range, the new

chevy volt they say is going to get 80 mileses on a full charge i read in 2016? 50. okay. 50 then you get to a point where you can really be more reliance on the work place charge and not having to be doing the over night, you i think that is more in the economical range for nonprofit civil rights attorney -- >> one thing that might help there is a couple of different tools out there, u.c. david, uc irvine, and the air resources board is hosting these but it basically gives you the opportunity to take a look at the ownership of the vehicle, how much you pay for the vehicle and the fuel cost very sess the

vehicle fuel costs, for the ev it's startling, the numbers for the every day person if they're driving over 20 miles the numbers close so quickly, the ev becomes your only solution in terms of cost, i will see if i can make that tool available to you all, you can view it for yourself, and push it out to the people here. i think it's really valuable for folks to see that themselves, >> that would be great. commissioner wald? >> so this is clearly a daunting challenge it's very gratifying to see what seems to me huge sumses of money at both the state and regional level to invest. it's also gratifying to see that organizations, groups that

didn't always work so collaboratively together even on this particular issue are working hand in glove and making huge advances it's gratifying to see there are lots of programs out there, it's still clearly a really huge challenge. so i wonder if each of you wouldn't mind -- we're only san francisco, i shouldn't say "only" because we're san francisco. but i wonder if each of you wouldn't mind hopefully, now, telling us the one thing from your particular point of view and perspective, that san francisco should do that would help us get to where we need to be when we need to be there.

and maybe we could all take that and figure out how to make all three, or maybe two or maybe only one of those things happen. roland you want to start? i know we have to put a price on carbon, we can't do that right tom? [laughter]. >> well, let me get back to i think damian mentioned -- it turned out to be on the national average, 50% of households have access to a drive way or a garage, and the other half do not. the other half also happens to be a fertile market for electric vehicles they are in city which are typically, very progressive, and also the opportunities for many short trips, so the question is -- the challenge is infrastructure, so

the tough nut that i think san francisco, from my perspective, building out the market for light duty vehicles, how do we tap into this market which is 50% of the household, which have a difficult time as you mention mentioned trying to figure out where you charge the vehicle. a lot of activity occurring there. i will point back to the tough nut to crack, is money. a tough nut to crack is bodies on this issue, even if you have money trying to convince an owner of a building to install a charger or wok place, is not easy. what we're looking at right now the three iou's utilities pg and e, and southern california gas and election put on the