we can deal with affordable housing we are having the mayor and i are having good conversations with the aspects of the what the bond looks like and what it is still being worked out we embrace a larger bonds right now hope to have things up to $350 million according the piecemeal i've seen so far for what's considered for building in san francisco is centralized in certain parts of city principally in district 3 and where our public housing sites and mission bay and transbay and bayview hunters point area this year formal redevelopment areas but terms of the outer areas the expiring and sunset and a visitacion valley there are

opportunities stooits sites but not a lot of work put forward to develop those if we have a larger bond we can help build in those areas that haven't seen the connective boom going on in san francisco and building next year's housing on the commercial corridors will help achieve that that's one of the bigger goals to extend our project to at part of san francisco have a member of the budget committee motion to amend this down to $350 million to keep it together with the mayors bond would be great. >> we'll entertain that after public comment and there are different speakers thank you supervisor avalos at this point ask the mayor's office of housing to speak on item 10 and

note colleagues i'll be introductory an amendment to extend the amount of monies up. >> good morning, supervisors kate hart i didn't deputy director of the mayor's office of housing i have a brief presentation i'll load that up here we are here today asking for our recommendation to the full board of an approval of $300 million general obligation bond i'm sure you're aware of we were able to increase this from 250 this week

as supervisor avalos stated that was savings and we are very happy about that we have been working on this for quite some. the outreach was in april with subcommittee he meetings we are very anxious to get to november and to be able to get this bond approved by the voters this bond at $300 million fits within the capital planning framework and will not result in a praiks increase we know that based on prior attempts at housing bond legislation that did not pass this effort to maintain the capital planning framework and it our best chance

of success for package guarantee job think this is necessary to spend much time receiving the need we've heard over 10 hours of testimony about displacement and loss i think that is suffices to say 2/3rd's of san franciscans were to lost their homes today would not favored the each one sale price of homes in san francisco further we need additional production to meet our population growth needs especially in the moderate housing range we're also far behind in low income housing production this has coincides unfortunately with a loss of significant research for affordable housing development $30 million a year

lost with a depletion of proposition one c and 46 we lost another $44 million a year and had our funds cut repeatedly and the san francisco housing authority has been cut to a point that is very inadequate the mayors response and the city's responses has been quite strong we voters approved a housing trust fund in 2012 that provided significant resources for the affordable housing development we've instantaneous on the difficult task of transforming every unit of affordable housing in our city with the reenvisioning of public housing we are on track for the affordable housing 10 thousand units to low and moderate income households we're fully

supportive of the goals of prop k and making changes to have our production be more efficient and faster our exist resources are significant we're on track to build or rehab over 10 thousand units by 2020 but unfortunately we need additional resources over the next 6 years without the bond we'll have about $862 million to spend on affordable housing and almost $2.5 billion over 20 years we need the $300 million air force bonds for the next year's we've got low income and middle school housing we specifically want to serve the city's most vulnerable residents that's the

consensus of the working groups that have advised on this bond measure we're proposing a range of resources devoted to each the indications the reason we have a range is because rather than a specific project identified is because all the funding we get with the bond we can take and leverage twice over depending on tax credit availability and other state funds we also are working within the market conditions so it is at at this point it is not possible to identify a project and put a price on it and exactly record how the bond will be used but those are the ranks for the 2 categories we have and just for illustration purposes provides

water a sample how the bonds for public housing we want to accelerate the development timeline of potrero and sunnydale if we don't have the bond procedures the build out of sunnydale could take 28 years so people living in substandard conditions for 28 years we can build family housing and senior housing supportive housing with precedes and also acquire rent control buildings and stop the loss of affordable housing and we can acquire new sites to make an investment in 9 future in addition for middle school hours we want to put more resources into a downtown resource program a rental program convert market rate to middle school you units

and refund the future next door program and just very quickly a few examples of what this bond can do the prerenovation of hunters point with boarded up windows and the post renovation with new parkland and new unit s again for the low income housing category we have a range of potential uses that will address critically affordable housing needs to hours that have area an end to the means. >> ms. had a rightly what's the definition of middle-income housing. >> middle-income housing would be housing between 80 percent of ami up to hundred and 50 percent of ami roughly for our middle-income rental program the

cap we're proposing it hundred and 20 percent of area medium income and to give you a feel for a 4 person holders they'd hundred and $22,000 for that family at hundred and 20. >> thank you. >> this is an example of low income housing it was incentive with tax credits and serves formally chronically homeless and it has a job training site our fund were effective leveraged in this development. >> middle-income housing is in great need we are only at 19 percent of our original production goals we wanted to launch this new middle-income rental program we want to increase down payment assistance loans and extend and a xaendz to

reach more holders it has a high-level of accountability providing quarterly reports inform the board we conduct excessive outreach and our citywide loan has the underwriting the loans and this board of supervisors as your do you go approved our housing revenue bond issuance that summarizes our presentation that concludes my presentation. i should say again, we're very excited about the 3 hundred employed e million dollars bond and appreciate our recommendation. >> okay. thank you very much colleagues if no further discussion commissioner tang. >> thank you. i want to say briefly i added my name a

co-sponsor to this particular bond item 10 because i felt that in our city we haven't done a lot to address the low income housing at least one 50 percent ami so given some of the other federal funding grant programs for requirements for the income levels i felt strongly how this bond level how we can achieve the help from middle-income housing and excited about the down up to that time loan and helping the teachers those are things i know we will have difficulty exclusively in other ways i know we've given a range for the middle-income portion i hope we can go to the higher end of that thank you very much. >> supervisor mar. >> yeah. first of all, thank you for the great presentation i

want to thank commissioner avalos for his opening and the request for the adjustment of the 5 hydromillion dollars down to $350 million i'll ask about the small site fund works into the forest to protect affordable housing in the city and how we need to identify more of the small sites for acquisition rehabilitation as well. >> our small sites program got a false start but now gangbusters and we have fully funded we have enough units so that all our allocation today for small sites is assigned and so we're quite anxious to use the proceeds to basically expand the small sites program ideally to buy bigger buildings that are rent controlled and

preserve the housing so the bond procedures for that use about fall into the low income housing category because with small sites we've serve holders up to medium income advertised a great long term strategy we want to keep our small sites program going and broaden it. >> i want to thank jeff the mayor's office of housing advisor for working on innovative ways to increase from the density bonus to many other programs and i think as admission moratorium discussion and debate ravaged on last week i'm really prevalent of the bumping up the mayors budget and

key places where displacement of low income busy artists and things are happening i know that is spread as other supervisors are thinking about the development and equitable development all those types of programs are incredible i want to ask one question about the mayors goals i know you mentioned renée the assessment association bay area government goals are much higher and 60 percent affordable and our own gentle plan has huge goals and needs of the city so the thirty thousand units what percentage of the goals of the 10 thousand units she mentioned or the thirty in house thousand goals are new units versus rehab of public housing we know that is a harder question i'm trying to get at

the huge niece and the range middle-income is not being that met i want to get a better sense of how much is new of the 10 thousand goal and the thirty thousand goal. >> i can tell you exactly of the 10 thousand 7 hundred low and moderate income units in the pipeline today to be completed by 2020 that it does include the rehabilitation of the rental unit that are 35 hundred and about another 4 hundred of substantial rehab developments in here this leaves 6 thousand 7 hundred around 6 thousand units that are new. >> 2/3rd's. >> right. >> that doesn't include any units opportunity with the new bond procedures so we'll be added to that we hope that a

good portion of the bond procedures precedes with the new construction and other bond please be seated, sir met as well. >> okay much appreciated open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on items 9 and 10 line up on the far wall two minutes please you can start. >> don't let me hear the term low income housing i was living in chinatown tiny rooms with my grandparents i'm good in my years i am in a nice neighborhood please drop all the funding housing along with education are the basic vital human life for america and hong kong they have good housing but

public housing is people given life matter how much funding so everyone can have basically education and at least see mission statement of democratic of the government to help the people in time of difficult days helping our citizen people through the difficult days to perform the holy function through education, politics and hole religion and power people they're working before the recovery of the intelligence to terminate of their insecurities and danger conditions and national security lives everyone entitled to a

good life and good teachers from church temple. >> and the establishment of the busy law through the land and earth and the law of hunlt r hunt and the human soul. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm asia wash asia on the case listen i'm here appalled of the mayor in his response and reaction to the protest of many people in the mission area as well as the bay area area i'm appalled but politics makes you you were it into a lunatic without a digitally doubt we'll have to follow the trend if there wasn't a teacup with

supervisor avalos here the mayor wouldn't have went up think on that their getting getting ready to have a mayors conference they commodity a whole race of our heritage for a week prior to that simply because the mayor didn't want any brown and black not when the conference come he can hide that lets talk about the city by the bayer bay i'm glad the mayors conference is here not city i'm go to say what i see here you've got the reenvision and the p p ease the rad the public housing you have to understand our population is in public housing the residents don't have a clue of what you doing you call it city hall i call t it silly lastly i'm ace

on the case the secretary of land use mr. castro mother visited any of the residents i'm asking some of the supervisors to ask the secretary to come back and find out what's been going with the public housing and the african-american in the city i'm ace damn it and i'm on this case. >> thank you very much anyone else wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i'll say i'll ems to my colleagues, i also sign on a co-sponsor of item 10 i believe whether the mayor or supervisor avalos intentions we spend more money without raising our property taxes for avenue and touching middle-income housing is something we need i'm a huge supporter and great that the

recorders office to increase and increase the money to $3 million and the mayors push we'll be introducing that and excited that will be part of it i want to go thank supervisor avalos for his comments and as we have in front of us the resolution have to be voted on up and down and with the recommendation or without recommendation and i'll recommend this to the full board and supervisor avalos desire to $350 million we will continue to have the dialog and hopefully come to something going forward with that supervisor avalos. >> thank you just my office is in negotiations with the mayor's office yesterday we met with jeff buckley and the mayor

himself and our budget director as well i think in the spirit of those discussions i'd like to see if if is possible to move them together both the resolutions together i know i wanted to see if mr. buckly was able to get any information from the mayor's office. >> good morning jeff with the mayor's office the mayor's office is open to that genocide in the chair is willing to consider it. >> to move both resolutions forward. >> to move both resolutions together from the chair is open to that. >> supervisor tang. >> thank you just one question we were able to raise 10:00 to 3:00 hydromillion dollars due to the changes in interest rate and whatnot for item 9 did desire to move it to $350 million what's

the impact i know i've seen analysis for from the bond measure were $500 million but down to 3 hundred and 50 on the rest of the capital plan. >> well, it's this gentleman answered the question it is symbolic right now until we have the bond before us i'm curious as well. >> good morning the analysis has for $300 million and the memo that was distributed earlier but we did an analysis for the 3 hydromillion dollars scenario not one for the $350 million scenario the trade off is either to move other capital issuances back or else

to change the policy of the 2006 level the 3-de hundred million dollars within the capital plan and the 2007 tax level. >> thank you so really having both resolutions together both of varying amazes 350 and 3 hundred is about acknowledging getting to a consensus measure i believe i intend to support a ballot measure going forward for housing and i would expect we will find common grounds that's the spirit of those two resolutions i appreciate the mayor's office acknowledging our discussions they're okay with both of the resolutions staying

together. >> thank you supervisor avalos i will defer here to the chief sponsor of item 10 and so if that's our intent with the co-sponsor you know one or the other i'd like a consensus measure that is good for all of us having to choose between the two obviously i'll sign up for both but we'll move. o them together. >> from the chair wants we can move the one measure with the through the chair. >> it is either an up and down vote whether or not to send those items forward so again it is either the mayors desire to continue it or what we do with one or the other. >> we would like to see them move forward with the spirit of

negotiations. >> that's fine a great outcome we'll move those and dir to the chief sponsor happy to do so any other questions or comments. >> first of all we have to have a motion to amend both items mr. gibner the committee to vote to send the items to the board or not you can vote without recommendation each one whether a resolution or an ordinance the committees discretion to recommend or not. >> and going forward without recommendation is fine. >> colleagues i didn't know that about the resolution it is always different supervisor mar i want to all the time item. >> yes. and so motion to amend

item 9 we'll take that without objection. i've submitted an amendment to $300 million. >> so moved. >> can we have a motion we'll take that without objection. and then i'll make the motion to forward item 9 without recommendation to the full board supervisor mar so we'll make that motion we'll take that without objection. and item 10 with recommendation to the full board as amended we'll take that without objection. >> thank you, everyone and appreciate it and look forward to the items. >> item 11 resolution for the controller's office to enter into a maintenance agreement with the incorporated not to exceed 2 point-27 point 8

million dollars and agreement with action for a two year term with on extension to implement a comprehensive enterprise system. >> okay. thank you we've got todd from the controller's office to speak. >> todd electricity deputy controller it is a pleasure to be before you this is the next step in the process for a project you've heard about the information and technology plan citywide as well as the last budget meeting a year ago you looked at the positions and approved those this project in particular to modernize it for the san francisco we anticipate it a 20-year plus project offer $200 million of activity and in fact every transaction the

project is summarized on 5 brief slides we currently have an update in the latter 1990s no longer exists for the system that the city uses and as you can see on the screen here that i have a picture of an old computer of the 1980s which that was implemented the gene looks like it does not a friendly screen the process of a $9 million budget no updates are any longer available for this and the new technology is shown here and include mobile applications as well as the ability to do more easy in transparent reporting and provides for work loads for individuals and provides for increased reporting and the project