>> okay, the meeting will quh

to order. this is a spsh meeting of the government oversight committee for june 11, 2015. i'm supervisor yee and and the chair thof committee. to the right and s supervisor christensen vice chair and supervisor breed is on her way. there committee clerk is erica major. the committee would like to acknowledge the staff at sfgtv, john stokes and jessie larsen wloo record each of our meet

jgz make the transscripts available to the public on line j >> please silence all cell phones and devices. [inaudible] to bhee included as part of the file should be commit today the clerk. items acted will appear on june 23 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated >> could you call item 1 >> item 1 is woods_670@hotmail.com [inaudible] referring to basically says that we can

collect 1.86 cents per scare foot for residential development squz over 10 units and 93 cents for projects below 10 units. for non residential developments we could collect 1.59 cents per square feet. this is to expand in the areas outside of incommittee plans. it generates-if this were to happen if we maximize our fees to these amounts we could generate an additional 5 million in the next 7 to 10 years that could be used for child care facilities. i believe the sit a has struggled in the last year to meet the demand for child care. the infant toddler and preschool age in the city increased by 10

percent from 37, 890 to 41, 340 between the years of 2000 and 2010. according to the cheerns cancel [inaudible] topped 3500 names. the reason we see this level is our inability to build new child care centers and according to the low income investment fund, nearly 9 million in reyest if child care capital projects were made for fiscal year 15, but only a little more than 2 million was mail available chblt therefore i would like to insure we can expand this fee to cover new commercial and residential development to be tibel build

new centers and expand the capacity of existing centers. i want to do that without compromiseing our ability to continue to build housing in the city that is facing a unprecedented housing crisis. especially since the needs of the spaulsh residential buildsers and that is why i want to create a smaller fee for projects under 10 units. colleagues we will hear from the selection of developers if they are here. city planning was not going to be here, so-is there any developers here, that were invited? i see none, so colleagues we have any comments? okay, so is there public comments for this item?

it works. >> good afternoon my name st. candous wong and director of child care facilities fund. thank you for moving for the next study is long overdue. in the city we are very prosprss and see creating everywhere and grouth in the city and we haven't had the opportunity to keep up with the growth if cliled care and i think it is opportunity be tibel collect additional fees to help support child care development which is needed. it pshzs the city for opportunity for leveraging growth at the state and federal lechbl where there haveinate been facilities we lost on those opportunity y. think with the improving economy we'll see more of those opportunity. i think there is also the issue of the fact we do have 9

million dollars of requests on the current pipeline because there were not resources available some projects will not happen or be deferred and if there were resources we would be aivl to move some of the projects forward. thank you >> thank you any other public comment? seeing none public comment is closed. i want to say that the purpose of this hearing is to allow for the public and developers to-if they had concerns about the next study and i want to say that in order to expand the child care facilities funds to match up with the latest studies around child care futillsies there will be legislation introduced to make that happen and looking forward

to introducing that piece of legislation in the next few weeks. without any other comments we'll move on to the next item. >> would you like to make a motion? >> um, let's make a motion-somebodyp to make a motion [inaudible] okay. no objection, motion passes. madam clerk please call items 2-6 >> item number 2-6 are ordinances adopting and implementing memorandum between the city and count of of san francisco. >> is martin grand from the dh apartment of human resources here? he is not here.

knepublic comment from 2-6? seeing none public comment is closed. colleagues any thoughts? sorry president breed, thank frz joining us >> thank you. it was my understanding we would get a presentation for the items, is that not going to happen today? >> that was my understanding and martin grant from the department of human resources was supposed to be here and he isn't here >> should we continue the heightms. i guess we can take a break our resrs until he is here, but ultimately that was my expectations and i'm not certain i'm comfortable voting these out of committee until we have- >> let's resess this and

continue on. >> okay welcome back, apologize for the delay there was confusion about the timing of everything. we were on item 2 i believe. 2-6. at this time i would like to invite martin graham flaum the department of human resources who will be presenting on these items >> thank you mr. supervisor committee members and the chair, i'm martden graim rr relations drecktder for the city dhr. today we are before you a package of contract successor mou contracts and also amendments to existing

mou's in addition the [inaudible] ord nns. those are different agenda items, but if i can speak to each of them at this point with your permission i'm happy to do so. the first 2 items are 2 contracts negotiated with the cities physicians and dentists and veterinarians. this is a unit that is primarily represented by or primarily employed by the department of public health, the physicians and that's is the biggest group here. the contract provides for a continuation of wages for the biggest group, the physicians to be commence rate based on a arbitration awarded inl the last year which pegged salaries for physicians in dph to salaries of the highest paid rn

classification, the nurse practitioners so that has continued for the award. the other units were given-the other members of the bargain unit thrks non physician which leaveathize animal care office and animal control and veterinarians get the [inaudible] in the local 21 and other contracts with the city. they are approximatetly 2 coming [inaudible] in the one and one is 3.25 percent and the next is subject to a formula so nothing groundbreaking in the economics. you see from the controllers report these contracts fit into the cities pattern developed last year for labor. the second or third item on the agenda is a

amendment to put pin wage rates for new apprenticeships classifications for the labors union, so we are happy we are able to negotiate a strong apprenticeship agreement with the labors local 261 and when we do that the [inaudible] that have to go into the the contract the wages and benefits we put that in the contract so happy to do that at a modest cast as you will see from the controllers report. the next item is the h 1 firefigeter paramedic squz the hr paramedics are only 3 active members, but it is updated so that it keeps pace with the other firefigeter contracts both in terms of the term on the agreement and ending of one of the benefits, the sunset of

the wellness proposal dating back to the early 2000 [inaudible] extend the cost of living increase in the other labor igruments, so is it, a modest package this year. >> okay, any questions? seeing none i think we went through-i'll do this again, any public comments on this item? skiing none public comment is closed. anyone like to the make a motion to move the items for recommendation and send them as a committee report to the next bord meeting? no objection, motion passes. thank you very much mr. graham. madam clerk are there any other items? >> there is no further business

>> okay, meeting adjourned. thank you very much. z >> please come to order and secretary call the roll. >> make sure your microphones are purned on. >> pating >> present >> singer >> chow >> present >> chung >> present sanchez >> paren present. >> karshmer >> present.

>> the meeting is june 2, 2015 we have one public comment. >> public comment please? >> good afternoon commissioner the minutes he lied too much of what transpyred of may 19th. item seven. page seven omits this commission has had authority since 1988 to hold prop qharic. it began in 200719 years after prop two passed. as reported in this extract in my new article there is no motion of april 29th. memo documenting the loss of 200

hospital beds between 2002 and 2020 with old two prop two harings with a total of 150 beds how did you lose the other 136 sniff beds without public front q hearing santa monica the minutes under report d hp failed to provide needs analysis that you requested eight years ago there is no mention of what turned out to be the secret city attorney advice to you gutting prop two by aborting issuing a single finding prop two requires you to issue. the minutes say nothing about the second and third resolve clauses rs and failed to report you have imposed a six month deadline to dph to provide you

with eight year passed due sniff needs analysis there is no dph advice you april 29th quote any redugs for sf beds is in san francisco and likely to have a detrimental impact there is nothing about the sniff closure will be detrimental the analysis warned you twice the minutes failed to warn you of the prop two all among for 27 years the very authority for you to consider community alternative tell us which appears you have never done despite it being clearly written 27 years ago in the voter guide. in your haste to convert prop

two hearings to quote positive findings this commission has tramp led our democratic processies i will send to forward it to you. i hope you read every word of it. >> thank you commissioners the minutes are before us. and a motion for approval was in order. >> motion for approval is in order. >> is there a second? is there a second? >> second >> i heard a second to the minutes. are there corrections to the minutes at this time? hearing none we're prepared for the vote. all those in favor, say, "aye." of may 19. >> >> (multiple voices): aye. >> >> all opposed? minuted approved. next item please >> the director's report

>> good afternoon commission mers the mayor proposed his fiscal year for 15-16. creating an educated livable city our department's budget growth by $45.3 million many in 15-16 with a budget of $2.3 million with service epi-hansments and critical safety net. you will get more from greg wagner our cfo but we're storing 8 million in the reduction this includes a 5% of costs over two years for nonprofits, we're creating 30 additional respite beds to accommodate the current needs of members with homeless

with chronic medical conditions in our shelters to reduce to 0 hiv infections also for service enhancementses provides significant funding for technology and infrastructure. with the approval of the board of servers signed by the mayor ed lee. to ba koe will not be used in san francisco. to prevent youth from a lifetime of nicotine addition. the health department will welcome the mayor's executive fellow in it's marketing effort the mayor's fellowship program is competitive to matches departments to seasoned professionals with more than ten years in the field we're looking

forward to having this additional fellow in our network just to let you know the city has developed a process for donations also looking at equipment that is no longer usable in the city for donation and we have a department administrator chief sunka who is the lead on this if you have any -- to donate particularly, this is due to the issue in nepal and we're trying to organize throughout the city how to get donations and equipment effectively. i will leave the directors report to that and leave for any questions for commissioners >> thank you before the questions we do have one public comment mr. monashaw >> thank you commissioner chow. i will make this under three

minutes mr. morewitz. i'm really worried already about this marketing expert director garcia mrs. garcia >> yes i'm listening >> you remember that disastrous branding in laguna remember? they wanted to take out the word hospital. god help you if this marketing expert tells you to take out the word general or san francisco or -- i don't know -- public health. you need to stop already with the rebranding. patients are either going to choose you for your service like win spauling or they're not. marketing is not going to help

it. in fact mark zuckerberg should take his name off that facility. you should market it heavily as a trauma center not as a city guest to ability there. >> thank you. commissioners questionses to the director on her report please? does anyone have -- i will start with one comment which is in regards to the oral health strategy health employees that the collaborative is going to different neighborhoods that was in china town now it's out in the mission i'm hoping that we will have a report back on what is happening.

i forget we agendaed that last time we were >> yes, sir? i believe it was a year it would take that long for the activities of the plan to come to frition. is what the plan is >> at least we're getting the information out to our districts and i would suggest that because it is something that is actually in motion that we try to have a report back at least at the public health committee within a half year >> yes commissioner we can do that as well in this budget there will be a coordinator for oral health for ncah addition from the mayor's office >> that is excellent it goes along with the number of initiatives we're actually able to look in and supporting our housing and nonprofits which i think we all can thank the mayor

and we hope to thank the board when we get the final report on the budget. commission mers any other questions to the director at this point? if not we will move onto the next item please >> item four is general public comment and we have several >> yes we have two general public comments mr. manishaw is our first public commenters >> thank you again commissioner. this commission should be completely ashamed of itself for trashing or democracy on may 195 of you voted to overturn the well of 129,000 voters who passed prop 720 years ago 1988 how this health commission in 1989 known about prop two the 26 years he served on this commission it was clear may 19th

some of you never read prop two so you know what's required of you the handout you were given is an abstract from the 1988 voters guide to pose the question to the voters on their official ballot and legal prop two which requires you to find a single finding of proposed services will or will not end quote have a detrimental effect rather than ruling on st. mary's closure will not be detrimental because it did x y or z you relied on a secret city attorney opinion exempting from issuing a single finding prop q authorizes you to fish you hiding behind secret city attorney and advice

is obscene commissioner chow. it's passed through the ballot box not through you or the city attorney if you want prop q changed go back to the voters and ask them the resend it. how did the five of you who passed his resolution know better than the 129,275 voters who passed prop 227 years ago concerned about the sudden closier of health care facilities you can't overturn a citizens initiative by passing secret city attorney opinions you who authorized you to so trash our democracy.

what you should have done was retain the voter mandated well or will not be detrimental by adding a clause to a finding ruling it might not be detrimental because st. mary's had accomplished xy or z you could have done it that way without relying on a city attorney opinion that is secret. you didn't need to dock our denominatoric democracy i plan to address the civil grand jury. >> thank you. our next public speaker is dr. tompkins. >> good afternoon commission mers. unfortunately i have to report back on a process that we have been engaged in the clean air

health alliance and the situation that took place between the other regulators and the failure of the staff of the san francisco health department to speak out against racism in our discussion for negotiating clean air criteria our president misses more shirley moore who cannot be here due to a death many her family she's back east who is a retired nurse from the san francisco health department when we were talking lemard and their lead environmental specialist and we were discussing the an nick dotal evidence of dust in homes his response to mrs. moore and julia because they live right above where the stadium the top level is is that