do in a very short presentation and own it up for discussions and questions but quickly recap the june 2nd committee as a whole meeting last tuesday and summarize the process and finalize the el cap and have an overview of the questions and keeping in mind we also will have a deep dive opportunity for a deeper kind of into the budget at the committee of the whole meeting next tuesday and review i mean final steps so to recap our meeting from last week we met on june 2nd and discussed the el cap and budget specific tapes that were included to the board to the highlights of the

governors revisions and talked about the cal stare impact on the sfusd pribt budget specifically on benefit costs we provides water you with some projections the revenue of 2015-2016 as well as the expenditure projections for that year we actually reprinted those relevant slides if you want to refer to them we're going into the level of detail by the revenue projections on slide 6 and the expenditures on slide 7. of this current presentation we provides water you with and we

also went through el mounted the financial projection upstairs you've reprinted on this presentation in slide 8 i can quickly project that in a minute we discussed some above fund and budget proprietors and highlight and discussed the piece professional for the p in connection with our desire to reduce our districts contribution of p to the district channel fund and we also discussed briefly the ene el cap and the process report all this material as well as tonight's presentation are on the sfusd's.org.edu u website

interest were several questions from the commissioners at the last committee as a whole the center was primarily on the how the el cap was to be used to underscore the chronic absenteeism and the other recommended investments and questions simple as that what are the recommended investments especially p was from the general fund and the boards expressed a desire to see the general fund expenditures that were rather the additional modifications to the p expenditure plan that as deputy superintendent lee we'll have that to share tomorrow and then there were questions

about workforce housing, the employee assistance plan substitutes technology train and computer science the student assignment and enrollment system basically foreshadowing some of the agenda items we've discuss at tonight's meeting and then a discussion of the rising transportation costs and how much was set that was trickled to the new contract was extend services how much of the increase related to special education transportation the general transportation we introduced the proposal to have a school marketing specialist and the questions were surrounding how that position will be connected with the school improvement and the site based fund efforts and as you recall we also indicated a

revision to the cost of living adjustment from 1.5 foe 1.02 and questions about the department of finance project projection or so were reliable and the next to researching that question and there were several questions around the utilization of our title one fund in our school district and we have worked with the from time to time office to provide a robs to our questions those were sent out by mr. steely want to say obtain monday >> yesterday yeah. >> and then there was a kind of a broad are question whether the budget will highlight private

donations and sustainability we're work on the responded responses to your questions and presenting our responses on the june 16th june 16th calendar meeting that was reference the general fund revenues for the districts for the current year as well as the next year calendar 2015-2016 the general fund expenditures sorry- let's i need the slide sorry this is the revenue and you expenditure budget i i'll as showing our projected fund balance that is hillside by the shadows of chair unfortunately but you have that in front of

you sorry and again i don't want to spend time we've gone through this in great detail suffice is to say we've outlined the enumerated and listed the major areas of increase for the 63 $.6 million compared to the 2014-2015 year and that's listed on this slide and we presented the projects for the general fund including the variance from year to year and to recap and this is pretty much the same slide we presented at the last meeting to kind of underscore the fact we'll have a committee as a whole open the el

cap and budget on the adjoin 16 the second reading will take place on the 23rd of june and that will be the date of the adoption of both the documents we sent the governor will sign the adopted state budget by july 1st and staff will be working over the summer to reflect any changes that may be in the final state budget and incorporate that into our budget into the extent there will be variance with the - in september, october there will be revised locations sent out to the school site and the revised budget are returned to us in october fiscal office is working as we

right now actually before we've started the work on starting for the workforce 2015-2016 and it will be presented due to the state on october 15th and presented to the board the tuesday that is closet to the october 15th date in december we'll be working closely with the auditors to complete our annual audit and prep the ferries interim report that is due to the state on december 5th and if i ask add. >> couple of things one is that the current draft of theat1 the current draft of the el cap and the budget book you received on friday those are

available on the budget page the districts website as well i'd like to make one comment business owner about the budget book if you have started looking at it you've noticed that some the consent especially around the sf description have to be updated the information you've heard under the item m discussion from the deputy superintendent gerrero and the team. >> (inaudible). >> that's my department. >> i didn't realize for that a dramatic effect. >> i screw want to point out some of that information needs to be just want and will be just want for the second reading but

there's a little bit of a work in progress didn't get communicated in time for the printing of the first reading booklet. >> deputy superintendent i asked superintendant that really cool guy i asked him about this page 67 of that book the one that was proposed budget on the office of family and parent engagement it is zeroed out that a hundred it was hit by a hundred percent and he said to look under another category but i believe that category was number 143 off-street parking we're consolidating but missing

over 2 hundred thousand i wanted to lowest the commissioners if they're reviewing the book and see the office of family engagement disappeared i think they're going to adjust that thank you. >> just to follow-up on the sf t; s there's a reference to the exhibit we it will be included in the second reading. >> let's see kevin was the only other public speaker so public comment is closed. >> and board rules do allow for

discussion on these items tonight are try any additional questions or comments commissioner wynns. >> thank you. i would like to oh i want to probe about the title one issue so i have the answers to the questions but i just want to so the main answer is that our allocation is less but all of those the implications we're using the fund for we're mandated to use the funds are percentages my question is are we getting they add up to more than the allocations are we using a percentage the money we used last year in terms of is the - are these percentages 40 percent directly to schools and 15 percent for administrator blah,

blah, blah are they percentages the $2 million or the percentages of those that we have left. >> okay. what our looking at the responses we provides water those are preservation for next year actually. >> so the percentage is the percentage of $11.2 million. >> whatever our allocation. >> how can percentages audience up for more than the allocation itself. >> you be specific along the right column the amount. >> the totals allocations are $12 million plus and projected entitlement or allocation is $11.2 million and yeah. that's why we have the deficit in red. >> what i'm telling you the

above amendments that is added is a percentage are they requiring us to spend more than a hundred percent. >> no a percentage was included because title one is the restricted resources and some percentage requirements on the total boogs allocation the way it was written to reflect why we had the shortfall because we are funded certain things on title one that exceeds the capacity. >> we're funding our tech avoidance for preschool so those things we're proposing to spend this is sort of the question we don't have to spend or transfer money into title one to spend money we're spend money on

preschool in our earlier education department and we've heard we're spending a lot of peace money and general fund money i don't understand why we're calling that a back filing of title one. >> that may not go be the best term but historically the same items at the same amount that shows if you continue that pattern there will be a deficit of $1.6 million. >> you think this is misleading we shouldn't see or is it that way it is not a good idea to vote on a budget we're spending $1.79 million from the general fund and transferring it into title one theoretically that's the way it is presented at the two budget meetings that seems to me it is wrong i don't see why we're doing that.

>> superintendent. >> yeah. so deputy superintendent lee will talk about that. >> thank you. superintendent quickly and we can modify the way of characterized as the a fairly easy thing to had the intention if you think about the question of giving the revenues we're giving significant revenues what's the expenditure that speaks for on xhoumz those are revenue increases there are a several two 0 which come to mind the largest representative the con restricted fund sources that you are either expiring or being reduced in order to maintain the consistent level of the programming we have to

absorb on the general fund the effect of those restricted funds either going away or being reduced the two on the chart they're on the slides are common core state phone or money that is a two year restricted grant it was eliminated we're continuing those are expenditures and so that is going to take 670-0000 to now under the general fund to continue and in the case of title one not an elimination but reductions in title one of $1 million plus we're not going to transfer into title one but reclasses those and have them charged to increase serviced

general fund. >> it seems to me we need to do and in fact at this excuse me. at the previous meeting we characterizations this as back filing title one spend she should say our m s p.s. s whatever we should say we're spending now less than than $3.2 million $2 million and make a note saying on the mp ss $2 million comes from title one that is less than from title one the toilet one revenue has changed that is has the same confusion about it looks like

we're spend things twice it isn't necessary we're spend are reproposing to say here's the mp ss and even another this is a unskriektd general fund in the federal fund spend this amount of money but all we'll have to do is say how much on mp ss and difference between what we spent this year and last year and note it's been reduced we're already spending more on the mp ss under the general fund if we wanted to put a note for the title one and now spend less we could do that but it - this clearly when this was explained i mean when i read this what was the answer to the

question this didn't make sense i think this is particularly true of federal funds after all we have a committee who's job to understanding the committee and to approve it and structure something in the budget that is so confusing so even though is it so not urban truthful it is clearly misleading or potentially misleading so i would like us to do that i think there are other places which as i've reviewing the budget will be revealed the same thing is true we have to find a way to say here's what we are spend and this is where the revenue comes from rather than amount of those things we have here those charts those shpts have difficult for

people to understand because there's things here that are actually, in the expenditure column and something like that so the budget where the money is coming from and less or more than before that's all. >> any further questions or comments about the budget at this time? commissioner walton >> i have a question one other than page 69 item college and career readiness am i reading it correctly a decrease in allocation from 2014-2015 to 2015-2016 2015-2016. >> yes, sir. that's a

$9 million decrease this could happen for a variety ever reasons there may have been a staff hired that were at a lower salary than what was try in the previous year but, yes you're right there's a $9,000 reduction, however if you look at the number of ftes fund that has not changed it is still at 5.5 ftes that was the level in 2014-2015. >> so the minimum amount we've addressed this a little bit we would like to understand a little bit just want when a was the reasoning for that and same page hundred 54 for any classification specialist funding programs what are we

talking about here. >> superintendent. >> page 5 did i'd like to ask kevin truit to kind of address that question and. >> you can comment so hundred 54 i sent rita a message it is specialist funding programs we put all the grants soft money it is renamed and it should be called counseling and posts secondary success that is is in the next reiteration a change of title and that's where counseling the staff on cook street that board will be

managed pie mary richard when they comics both my department and the executive director. >> any other questions. >> i wanted to thank the team for recapping the questions that came up i thought i had to write down them but you've captured one additional question you can respond to separately i was looking per the school looks at obligations and hoping for a bump at the school sites at rosa parks there's having a two percent bump and local two ftes i want to understand what two ftes is that bans student projections or what two fte are planning to be reduced and we will convene again next tuesday as a committee as a whole and interims that are

additional questions send them ahead to superintendent in advance of that meeting so staff we have an opportunity to respond. >> thank you, again, for your presentation. >> okay item r board members proposal the only item withdrawn and item s the board members to the other reports first, we want to share a report from the school district for commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell and commissioner fewer and commissioner wynns. >> so we had an essay an is school district student crossing guard actually, i know that commissioners it was fabulous so we are thank you to supervisor

yee who get money to start the program that was amazing how many people actually there had the part of the crossing guard when they were in school commissioner mendoza-mcdonnell was a school crossing guard and supervisor yee and other people oh, deputy superintendent oh, excuse me. (laughter) yes, he was a captain. >> i was a captain too yes. i know that my husband within a sergeant also anyway been implementing that it was 10 of our elementary schools; is that correct commissioners, i think that was 10 elementary school but anyway, that was a fabulous program and i asked the commissioners to go out and

visit it especially the ones at lake shore elementary school that was heartwarming a circulation with the police department so students are trapped and also schools are icing it as a school leadership program so quite fabulous thank you. >> thank you, commissioner fewer report from the committee as a whole on june 2nd commissioner vice president haney. >> affordable housing that was the budget and el cap you've heard a thorough summary of the questions and the conversation that took place there was reflected in the presentation tonight. >> thank you and report from the curriculum and program committee commissioner vice president haney. >> yes. one action item that was paths to sfusd crazy and

internship program we heard a bit how the program will be structuredtructuredructureductured about about board members and the internship and the number of them and we for the that to the board with a positive recommendation we heard that the lea and . >> youpt on the lgbtq curriculum question have a enter departmental group of folks percentage came together and put out a survey to teachers and schools around the fair educational act and more generally, the reflection of lgbtq community individuals in

our curriculum particularly in the social studies they're coming piling those are surveys. >> using those to find opportunities to insure that we are abide by the fair education act to its fullest stent and the lgbtq community is reflected in the curriculum and other update very likely the first lgbtq course that is offered at the school of the arts we have a teacher that will teach that and it was offered and that is the first one and the mission was considering that an update on high performing students that has a couple of impacts around the process our district is using to