on this item and they voted on a motion of support and with that, i have a representative and they will answer any questions and i am more than happy to answer any questions for this item. >> thank you. i don't think that we have any questions. >> thank you. for your presentation. and you work on developing the proposal. >> looking like the public comment and any member of the public that would like to comment? >> seeing none, we will close public comment. >> and colleagues could i have a motion to --. >> i move approval of this item. >> and seconded by commissioner kim and roll call vote. >> on item 5:00, commissioner avalos. aye. >> campos absent. >> mar. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >>, and item passes. >> next item please. >> item 6, recommend increasing the amount of the professional

services contract with parsons brinckerhoff by $224,600 not-to-exceed $596,000 for planning and engineering services for the 19th avenue, review project, and the terms and conditions, and this is an action item. >> good morning, liz bryson with the transportation planner, and also wearing a hat as sfmta contract manager for the 19th avenue, motion view project, and today i will cover just a little bit of a history of the 19th avenue, project's purpose and the tsa role in it and talk about the request before you today and so as the background, many of you know remember between 2012 and 2014 we conducted a feasibility study, and considering some of the pretty substantial and exciting changes to the mocean view and 19th avenue and one of the big rationales for looking at major changes was the major development that has been approved at park merced and

tripling the density there and as part of the agreement they are committed to making an investment for the 19th avenue and the m that is valued at 70 million through the feasibility study we considered several options for grades separating the costings of the mocean view with the 19th avenue and by considering taking it either over or under the street, and near the galleria and the park merced and in march of 2014, we concluded the feasibility study and having developed several options and identified one that we found to be the highest performing to advance into the subsequent phase of work and additional questions that we wanted to answer, in the phase of work that we are now in. and so this new phase we have been calling the preenvironmental and we need to prepare a document, called a study report and the project development support package and this is the first stage in preparing a project, that effects the state owned

right-of-way and as we move to the phase, there was agreement between sfcta and sfmta that sfmta would take over the lead role of the project and sfcta would be collaborating on the multiple fronts and including lending me as well as serving as a procuring agency for the effort. and about a year ago we conducted a competitive procurement and selected parsons for this phase of the project it has about a year and we have made strong progress, and cal trans, has engaged as we are having the meetings and anticipating being able to submit our draft, psr package some time this summer, and however, after a year, there are a few additional scope items that we see and we need to invest in, in this phase and that is subject of this request, the main rationale is

twofold, i made the level assumption that the level of engineering work that haded been conducted was going to be adequate to carry directly into the psr process and what we learned is that we needed to make some changes to that work to get to a set of plans profiled in the cross sections that can go into that package that is the major addition, and in it and the second piece of the addition has to do with wanting to take another look at the southern part of the project study area, and this is near the park merced and the omi neighborhood between randolph street and the park merced at this point, we are very interested in doing some conceptual work of additional option that will take the m, underground and there is several reasons that we think that it is important to do this now, and one is that we think that it is going to open up the phasing opportunities to be able to put forward the part of the project on the aggressive time line that we need to for the development time line and a

second reason is that we think that there is an opportunity to minimize the community, impacts and a third reason is that the more that we look at the constructbility of building a bridge over the right-of-way by lowering the roadways, and that will be a substantial cost driver for the project. and so the attachment to the memo and the scope in in addition and more detail as well as the rationale. and the plans and programs, committee next week will be considering prop k to fund this work and i have kept today's up date focused on what we need to do to continue the technical work, but we are anticipating our next major round of out reach somewhere in the fall to wintertime frame and i would be happy to do a thorough up date on the project at that time. with that i will conclude my presentation and happy to answer any questions. >> thank you, you covered a lot of ground there.

>> very impressive. and i appreciate you working with my office on the alternative for the m, through the omi, or over to the omi from the park merced i think that is, really important, to consider what the impacts are going to be there and so that is an ongoing effort and so i appreciate that work. >> commissioner mar. >> expressing one of the bits of information that you rattled off was a state own bridge? where is the bridge? >> sure. i was told that there might be a question so i did bring a visual if we can get the screen up. so this shows the study area if you look in the top right this is the south west corner of san francisco, and the location of the bridge that was proposed in the feasibility study was crossing from fox to ran dal right here. and the idea was that to build this bridge you would lower the state highway so that the bridge would go sort of

gradually mark merced to randolph street and so that bridge would be crossing the state right-of-way and of course, 19th avenue is i am not talking through the mic, the highway about 72,000 vehicles per day that cross on that road and so the challenge of needing to disrupt the traffic to actually get in there and build it, is one of the many things why we think that it is good to look at this additional option. >> okay. no other questions, here. and thank you for your presentation. and we look forward to seeing the actual, you know, the next you know, the deeper presentation from that. >> and so the public comment is now opened on item number six and any member of that public that would like to comment. >> seeing none we will close. >> and colleagues if we could have a motion to approve? >> i move approval. >> and seconded by commissioner kim? >> and we will have a roll call vote?

>> same house same call. >> item passes. >> thank you. >> next item please? >> item 7, recommend adopting the propose ad fiscal year, 15, 16 annual budget and work program and this is an action item. >> deputy director, for the administration, and what you have before you is the action item to adopt the proposed fiscal year, 15/16 annual budget and this item was brought to you for a preliminary review last month, and what has happened from this point from then to this point is that we have updated the numbers, and we have updated the numbers by 21,554 dollars, and this is a net change from additional revenue sources we have received and we have received the commitment of up to 200000 dollars from sfmta and the planning department. and $100,000 each, for the sf champ, and san francisco, demand forecast modeling and

what this 100,000 dollars from each of the agencies will help to contribute with the care and the maintenance and the up date of the champ model and we are, we will be able to implement the new relevant, features and reporting tools and a much, much, more. and now, this comes out at a crucial time since the state's planning and programming and monitoring sb 45 funds for this fiscal year is to be received for the transportation and we have received, 400,000 for this type of funding but because of where the state is, we will not be receiving any, this allows us to shift other funds that we have, the federal surface transportation programming, and three percent grants, and we will be able to save these funds, since we are receiving the additional contribution, from the two agencies and be able to save these for the future projects and the future upcoming projects in this coming year or future physical years.

ei also would like to, we also have a presentation from last month and commissioner campos requested additional information regarding one of the line items in the budget. and i would like to bring your attention to page 7 of the powerpoint presentation. and this represents a pie chart of the prop k sales tax capitol budget expenditure and it is $135 million and he specifically asked for what pieces of this and what, what are the funds going to? and as you can see from this, chart, 25 percent of it is going to the sfmta vehicle, procurement, and ten percent is going to the radio communication system project. and the transbay terminal, and the cal train receives ten percent and the brt will receive 7 and parkway will receive 7 percent and all of

the other projects will receive the remaining, 41 percent and that includes, street resurfacing, and the state of good repair and the muni forward. and for you these expenditures represent and anticipates 53 percent of future allocations that will come forward for the board for a full approval. and our estimates are from and the reimbursement for the past fiscal years and received on a quarterly basis and any additional sponsor information and the adopt the strategic plan and the five year prioritization programs. and with that, if there is not any other questions, and i would like to and end my presentation. >> no other questions here? >> thank you. >> great. >> so this item is now opened

for public comment and any member of the public who would like to comment? >> and seeing none, we will close the public comment. and we have a new house, and so the first the motion from commissioner campos and seconded by commissioner kim and i will have a roll call vote. >> item seven, commissioner avalos? >> aye. >> commissioner, campos. >> aye. >> cohen. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> and commissioner, mar. aye. >> mar, aye, the item passes. >> okay, very good, we are going to the next item and item 8, introduction of new items and this is an information item. colleagues any new business, commissioner kim? >> no. i don't have any new business, but i did want to make a motion to rescind the consent calendar to do a full vote on that item. >> the public comment is open. >> none forward, and we will close public comment and, so we

have a motion from commissioner kim to rescind the vote on the consent calendar. >> seconded by campos and we do that without objection. >> and so, now a revote on the consent calendar. >> okay on the consent calendar, nexter avalos. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> cohen. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> commissioner mar. >> aye. >> the consent calendar passes. >> okay, very good. and our next item. >> nine, public comment. >> general public comment is now open. any member of the public that would like to comment, seeing none, we will close, public comment. and next item? >> item 10, adjournment. >> okay, thank you very much we are adjourned..

>> good afternoon i'd like to call the order of general meeting of the united states constitution today is tuesday, june 9, 2015, roll call. >> commissioner president caen commissioner vietor