to not but they're very nature their enter did not hard to understand the details unless you're studying so having those things to study he hope the next step what about a refinement that makes that able to be 1r7b8d listed and assessable to people besides people at the school sites so i'm hoping that helps us and the public what is the multi tiered level of support i want to end by saying i appreciate that it actually has changed the vocabulary the different levels how we decide where the schools are and kids are and i think that is very important we we're actually it is part of our

ability to dpaevent needs whether it is schools programs are students or classrooms and i think that is very important so i'm just requesting that sort of public information which goes through us could be one the first testers of that to make it for assessable to people and thank you very much. >> sxhaep then commissioner walton. >> thank you for this and the information you've provides water and for the work that has gone into this and advanced information that will be continued to be provides water i appreciate the things that are coming to us i want to say something quickly i very much q agree to what was said before me if i understood it and in that is i think a question that i

would ask considering we're going to what i think of as both the next level of m t ss but the next levels of the thinking about the superintendent zone we really want to say important to undermine for sometime in that district the superintendent zones were a major strategy that really reflected our commitment to the highest needs schools and the preventively low perform schools and the earthquake and justice that framework is no longer in existence after that; right? beginning next year that feels like a big deal in a number of ways i understand how it feels like that system we have this is an improvement on that i understand everything you've said with that but what

would be helpful and not during the budget process that is what i heard commissioner wynns and commissioner fewer's comments more clarity and specific around what worked in what schools how far and i sort of need you know that is that learning is reflected in the new systems but that learn is important for us to be more out there about where we see the deep the transform and specifically those as a relative it seems like that was the purpose of superintendent zone to get here soy know we're going there i think that connection is important for us for what it feels last week it really needs to be pulled out more so we understand it and we

can as a board champion those real solutions and approaches that cellist and all of us in the community he can and again similar to what commissioner fewer said this sort of system change piece of it at the end feels very important there is the wrap around and the extra staffing and extra thresholds zone and such but those kinds of things if you've had 75 percent turn over in the school and brand new administrators those are wrap around folks you're putting if are covering for substitutes and helping the new teachers it is really it is some some ways not seeing the whole picture to understand that aspect what other strategies are we also using to fix those

problems that keep on happening every year that are systemic that we can spend our money better in the allocated staff if that continues to replicate itself every year the challenges around the changes will remain that is also what i'd like to see and the specific strategies in general wanting to see i know not pragmatic and stuff but how do we move the ball and how do we be more aggressive and do more if something worked from the superintendent zone how to do ten times more this is what the board wants to understand and benefit from the learning we've accomplished in the past years and accelerate to a scale

as well as system i's it maybe up until now what i'm guessing your we are that system allows us to think that way i appreciate that i hope we think that way as quickly as possible and as transparencyly and clearly; right around what we learned and how to go about it. >> commissioner walton. >> want to thank the team for sitting down with us prior to that meeting and taking the time for the systems of support i don't know why we can't come up with a simpler name but i appreciate the pill last year's i support this but i do appreciate the fact that we are coming up with strategies that allow flexibility for resources

to go to schools outside of what typically the schools do within their budget the one thing i do hundred percent agree with commissioner fewer on is the resources for infrastructure things that ordinary person sustain through turn over and certain systems there is technology centers and professional development plans and strategies that go to the schools to support of faculty if place regardless of the turn over or not i appreciate the thoughtfulness behind what we're trying to accomplish it would be great to make suretolysis strengthening components that really get to the infrastructure pieces that helps our schools to be sustainable i have to say regardless of what staff is available

and then i appreciate 2 of $.1 million allocated to m t ss that talks about tennis outlet i'm in favor of more possibilities for resources to support the system and i appreciate that work thank you. >> any other comments? i just want to thank the team an enormous amount of work you've done the cost analysis on all the schools and locate on-line them and summarizes them in terms of the tiers but i want to emphasis commissioner norton's point we want to communicate that to the families and the parent siding has been good at taking dense

abstract materials that we kick around in that building and make that very understandable and comprehendible to the families i encourage you to work with the parent advisory committee on how to make that more assessable to our families because i know i share this experience with in a colleagues of getting e-mails messages from families why those resources are torn away from the schools and understanding as commissioner fewer said the science behind the discussion will help thank you very much for your work and for the presentation and deputy superintendent >> a couple of comments first of all i want to appreciate this is not the work after a small team but a cross divisional body of work in many ways lead by the superintendent and the support teams working in partnership with the leaders

that have been deployed through the rp and others departments has been critical we want to get to a point of sophistication this is dashboarded for the general public comment to generate reports on their own and part find holy grail to determine the strategies that work for certainly pocket and breakdown the achievement gap it is in our next reraising we're prototyping some of the things we've learned early on point out not in only the superintendent zoning but a number of schools across the district who similarly had achievement gaps

that accelerated outcomes many lessons learned so the more the team came together to identify what the standardized approaches and the more unique and customized approaches are as helps. >> in the sort of continuous improvement and i'll continue to say advertise it not a central managed issue you have to exercise all the legislators you'll say the 2015-2016 proposed budget a continuing to turn the dials up with the street formula and the concentration money and the t ss support going in that equitable was that's important we know that is only our third it ration to undo generations of conditions permeated some of the schools

and some of our work hats to the been disconnected from other system level work; right? to address on for example commissioner fewer brought up the sort of the issue for example, of concentrations of students disabilities; right? that's our work in m t ss is not sdiblgd one the steps to objective not all the families with the students of disability have the options to maintain a consistent pathway there is an unequal program where do you think they were in schools that had space so we think that after a couple of years of work which our commissioners fielded a little bit of community we've realigned those and provides water the families a broader

away u array the choices and students have the same opportunity for the learner introduce an elementary or other experience those are big lobbyists big accomplishment that are a healthy balance for the thriving conditions to engage in if this this is our third it arbitration what is working and dispense there's a level of education we need to side more outreach we'll like to partnering with them to think about how to take what can be sort of perhaps you know a lot to understand in the concept is simple greater need greater support if we understand your needs we can be more exact of

the concept that's it in the in a nut shell when we think about an r ti we want to think about our schools >> add one thing so deputy superintendent when you give us that spreadsheet are they more support or less supportive thank you very much. >> thank you so much that concludes item n we move to item n cds resolution roved at the previous meeting there are none tonight and o vote open the consent calendar with the expectation of k-32 moved and seconded ms. casco roll call. >> ms. fewer. >> mr. haney

ms. mendoza-mcdonnell except items k-34 and their attractive and ms. norton mr. walton ms. wynns dr. murase. >> thank you item p consent calendar resolution severed for board action k-32 commissioner norton. >> yes actually i have a request like a data request about this which is that it is for a school loop, i.e. building it is renewing how loop contract i realize we've not seen an evaluation how school loop st. is working how many parents are using it what's the impact it is having i'd like to see that i know in general i'm a fan the tool as a parent but i

think that is definitely depends on where your teacher uses it regularly and exclusively and our school sites uses it i think that is - i'd like to see some evaluation and data around how it is being used and where can it improve and you know what kinds of initiatives what about put in place to expand the tool my personal experience some teachers use it and some don't. >> commissioner fewer. >> you know that's a good idea because i had an office experience with school loop it is something that we could probably improve on i don't know whether or not it is used more at some schools and speak grades you know is it elementary more and more high school that high

school more than elementary so i'd like to see that this is is a community it has the potential to side much more than one way condominium conversion of a teacher giving information to a parent but ignites or a catalyst i'd like to see that. >> and also i mean what's the how many families are using it like there is lots of data i'd like to see that we don't have to spend a ton of the time but you get the idea. >> one of the things we were supposed to be monitoring process towards can we make it a requirement that everybody uses it to if in the intervening

gradually have an impact if we leave it as being voluntary and never reassess where we are towards the ability to make it commentary we can't get the information what he want to know about the progress. >> i don't want to resolve this issue tonight i'll remind the commissioners we have the budget and closed session following this so superintendent for a response. >> great suggestion i don't want to steal the trirnd from our superintendant would say dying to answer that i want to remind the commissioners we're just finished the first year's laptop initiative 0 all of the secondary administrators and

special educators get the laptop and next year the other teachers point a point to commissioner wynns point we'll be able to then make it a requirement that you know there's a certain amount of updating that happens as the contractual all the time with the caveat district defenses. all the teachers just yet >> just that is a great baseline we'll be able to see the impact of the laptop program. >> okay i believe that will come to curriculum committee at some point in the future. >> i was thinking a written update with the data, however, you want to do that. >> okay. on k-32 ms. fewer mr. haney ms. mendoza-mcdonnell ms. norton

mr. walton ms. wynns dr. murase. >> 7 i's. >> we are now on condemn x the superintendent proposals for first reading i want to remind 5 minutes for public testimony on each the items we'll take that separately fiscal year 2015-2016 annual update of the local update and other control for the office of education and the san francisco unified school district i need a motion and second and so moved. >> thank you this will be back for action on june 22nd for per board rules the discussion is a loud we have two members of the public that want to comment (calling names). >> ms. casco two minutes please.

>> hi, i'm here on behalf of the public council i want to say a few things thank you very much for taking notice off our recommendations we accepted in our letter including the matrixes by sub groups and recurs the out of schools goal for that and also having our goals for foster youth for robust including having the staff trained if trauma regarding foster youth one point that's brought up the need for transparency with the fund especially for the concentration fund it is important that the community can understand how the funds are being allocated thank you. >> thank you very much is mr.

bothering us still in the audience not seeing him i understand we'll have a presentation i'd like a motion and second on the 2015-2016 recommended budget. >> i'll have a vote. >> second. >> thank you very much this too will be back for action an june 22nd so we'll now transition to the el cap but you deputy superintendent mr. lee. >> thank you dr. murase so we have anticipating from years of experience that this particular conversation will take place deep into the meeting we prepared a short presentation for tonight which our chief

financial officer will deliver but really our intention primarily is to save most of substantive conversation formal next tuesday committee as a whole and that conversation as you know commissioners is focused on the el cap and the recommended budget so there's a little bit of information we'll share tonight including the process updates and a little bit of a recap of the committee as a whole that took place last tuesday and we are working everyday on following up on the discussion of the go specific requests for questions that came up last tuesday and be providing more information to all you you by the end of the this week and having the confusion on next tuesday and we'll have a 9 slide

presentation. >> before - while we're getting assists i see nothing around the p subject you said we're to look at it is simultaneously is not referenced here am i missing something. >> commissioner you'll receive tomorrow by e-mail you'll receive a amended strergs of the p spending plan for 2015-2016 that the cac will be reviewing the same information so that information just to tell you what you'll see will include revised spend plan, which you saw in march and april highlights the changes between 2014-2015 and between the spend plan approved in april and the

one being recommended now as a suspended spends plan and there will be a brief narrative accompanying each part of the spending plan not in the april plan that it totals over $4 million and our intention to actually use the same format and use some of the same ways of presenting that information to subscribe some the investments that are embedded between the recommended budget that is going to take a couple of days longer you'll see information about p together and cac will see that tomorrow and over the next several cases general fund. >> we have to introduce it for first responder together.

>> thank you, commissioner our recommendation is to consider the boards adoption of the budget of the entire budget 0 for 2015-2016 as encompassing the p spending plan that is entirely an subset of the overall districts briths budget and the discussion tuesday and on the 23rd and the information will make that investment very but that is the districts budget on the 23rd exactly. >> good evening, commissioners so what we lived like to do in a very short presentation and own it up for discussions and questions but quickly recap the

june 2nd committee as a whole meeting last tuesday and summarize the process and finalize the el cap and have an overview of the questions and keeping in mind we also will have a deep dive opportunity for a deeper kind of into the budget at the committee of the whole meeting next tuesday and review i mean final steps so to recap our meeting from last week we met on june 2nd and discussed the el cap and budget specific tapes that were included to the board to the highlights of the governors revisions and talked about the cal stare impact on the sfusd pribt budget

specifically on benefit costs we provides water you with some projections the revenue of 2015-2016 as well as the expenditure projections for that year we actually reprinted those relevant slides if you want to refer to them we're going into the level of detail by the revenue projections on slide 6 and the expenditures on slide 7. of this current presentation we provides water you with and we also went through el mounted the financial projection upstairs you've reprinted on this presentation in slide 8 i can

quickly project that in a minute we discussed some above fund and budget proprietors and highlight and discussed the piece professional for the p in connection with our desire to reduce our districts contribution of p to the district channel fund and we also discussed briefly the ene el cap and the process report all this material as well as tonight's presentation are on the sfusd's.org.edu u website interest were several questions from the commissioners at the last committee as a whole the

center was primarily on the how the el cap was to be used to underscore the chronic absenteeism and the other recommended investments and questions simple as that what are the recommended investments especially p was from the general fund and the boards expressed a desire to see the general fund expenditures that were rather the additional modifications to the p expenditure plan that as deputy superintendent lee we'll have that to share tomorrow and then there were questions about workforce housing, the employee assistance plan substitutes technology train and computer scie