we're eliminating that fee as well and finally thank you to the budget analyst we've received the report last week and we haven't had a chance to discuss that but will be discussing that this week. >> thank you director ram. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you can you say a little bit more about your increase in staffing for the proposed budget versus the volume of work. >> because the volume of work your projecting not really increasing but you're asking for i guess about 15 more staff members. >> right that's right it is directly co-recommending to the staffing i guess i lost over

this chart glossed over this chart we're anticipating we're being conservative with the projections that the volume will stay at the high-level over the next two to three years we don't anticipate that will increase in vacuum but anticipate it will stay at the high-level we're trying to catch up as well as the work with the major policy efforts from affordable housing the pdr to transportation and so on. >> so, so i guess in converse the staffing you have this year is inadequate and i'm sorry. >> the staffing for this fiscal year is inadequate. >> it takes us awhile to catch

up with the volume so, yes those are it is almost entirely fund through the vice president fees through the general fund. >> thank you. >> okay colleagues any further questions mr. rose can we go to our report on planning please. yes classroom and members of the committee on the items we consider that to be a policy matter for the board and on the budget on page 71 our recommended budget total 563919 of that amount 250s plus are ongoing savings those reductions will allow an increase of one million dollars plus or 5 that is o .1 percent in the 2015-2016 and for 2016-2017 recommended reduction or ongoing savings we're working with the

department we'll report back to the department next week. >> thank you, mr. rose any questions we have item 10 first of all a motion to excuse supervisor wiener in the middle off o our land use commission open up for public comment is there anyone that worries about to pubically comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> colleagues i'd like to taken a motion to tend e send item 10 continue to the june budget & finance committee and motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang we'll take that without objection. thank you. we'll see you next monday mr. rose and next up mayor's office. >> supervisor. >> on the planning item john

gibner, deputy city attorney you can forward that to the july 14th rather than continuing to a further budget meeting. >> can i have a motion to resend. >> item number ten. >> item rescinded now to the july 14th board of supervisors. >> okay. we have a motion pie supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang we'll take that without objection. >> sorry real quick to the city attorney's office i neglected to say it maybe from the city attorney's office can you clarify that what that means for the public and those items will be exhausted. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney a few times today, i imagine ero over the next few days the department will agree with the budget analysts recommendations and they've 1086 noted that the committee agrees

with those recommendations as well through a tentative motion essential that is just a note to the mayor's office to the controller's office and other staff just to make sure they can track where the committee is leaning on various cuts but the committee can't take action more taken action until public comment that takes place on friday. >> can i- and supervisor yee. >> i'm a little bit confused for the city planning i thought - >> yeah john. >> did you we didn't have any agreement. >> i'm sorry in addition my comments refer to the aa o the overly budget which is continuing from this meeting in wednesday to friday and monday a

few trailing of legislation like the fee ordinances that accompanied this planning departments presentation could i and the committee can adopt those accompanying pieces avenue public comment so what the committee has been doing is taking public comment on those pieces and adopting them on the larger budget you'll not adapt to gill later next week. >> so supervisor yee we have departments coming forward if we're in agreement we can make a motion to approve the cuts so they don't have to coming come back but technically that is pending public comment on friday when we have our full public comment. >> and those departments not earring will be coming back next monday and can act on those items directly after public comment.

>> ms. housing stock. >> kate howard the mayors budget analyst for the coming two fiscal years i have with me kate hartley the deputy director and benjamin the finance director for m h pd the mission to represent the people of the people in the city and county of san francisco a full live plays for a vibrant environment i'll do a few slides noting what is happening in the mayor's office budget and hand the presentation over to kate to talk to you ta talk about the housing of the community development slides highlights the fact that the mayor's office budget is 85 percent spent on housing and community development and 14

percent of the budget is used for generosity administrative costs the second slide reflects the same kind of splilt split 76 loans or grants recommended to affordable housing and 14 percent on staff and other operational costs our overall budget this year there's fyi for 16.6 to more in 2015-201685 percent of the budget and growth noted to housing and grants and loans i want to note now and say thank you to harvey and deborah our budget analyst for their thorough review the mayor's office budget we're in agreement with the elements they make in their report not in agreement

with the policy recommendations the administration 0 office of the mayor grows by hundred and $94,000 due to salary for the prelims of the ordinance as well as a one-time the inspiration of a one-time grant for a success program and high-level as you can see in this table major changes by program areas this the city administration changes largely because of open data the office of strategy aspirins it declining because of the expiration of the grant and the community investment side that we'll go into in more detail but community development and block

grant fund and housing for people with hiv and aids and the subsidy program that supports the subsidy for people that are formally homeless i'm going to turn it over to kate hartley to talk about the affordable housing and community development right now. >> thank you and sore madam clerk call item 11 with. >> yes. mr. chair item 11 resolution declaring the intent of the city to invoke the natural bonds independents. >> kate hartley deputy director of the departments the mission of mc d to promote affordable housing to fund the preservation

of our affordable housing shock as safe and descent housing and provide grants to community based organizations to assist families and individuals and neighborhoods in need in order to do this we draw on a wide variety of housing sources to highlight from the 2015-2016 budget items are you we'll be preceding with the second installment of $25 million of housing fund and receive our charter prescribed of 2 housing unit $8 million we will be in receipt of a one-time bond from the investment & infrastructure and we'll be launch an accelerate fund with the help of 200 plus million dollars to

leverage for resources for affordable housing on a community development side we will be offsetting federal cuts to aids related programs continue proposing to continue board enhancements for the non-services and section services and provided services to transition aged youth so similar fiscal year we were able to use our resources to help 63 households purchase an affordable home and launched a program ahead stated at capacity 60 units in the pipeline and thirty households that lost their housing due to an ellis act eviction and committed fund to build housing including over

35 hundred units of public housing we are continuing our asset martin luther king it is over $21,000 housing we have come mentioned predevelopment on at 45 hundred units, we introduced neighborhood preference legislation to help existing san franciscans obscure avenue in the neighborhood in which we live and we work with other stakeholders introduced legislation for a housing bond in november of $300 million we will continue in 2015-2016 to bring all this work to fruition to get more affordable units on line and continue our transformation of public housing and will begin a new recycle to

bring as many affordable units online as quickly as possible in closing as kate howard said we're in agreement with the budget analyst kit recommendations i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you very much supervisor mar. >> real quickly on the small sites shoiksz fund where are those 60 units being acquired and rehabbed. >> approximately, six in the admission and we have units in the castro and selma and in the tenderloin. >> thank you supervisor yee. >> with potential package of the bond measure in november will this require more staffing. >> we've not proposed new staff for the new bond measure right

now our staff i will say is at capacity we're working extremely hard to move the rental demonstration program forward this is very difficult to a staffing effort it is relating short time starting phase one in october and once construction this is relieved to our staff we have phase two starting off that but in construction on phase two in 2016 and once that construction starts our staff will have more room to bring the bond funded projects to predevelopment. >> so would the staff attendance to the bond measure this is so you have potential bond staffing capacity and in terms of project management the neighborhood preference legislation does acknowledge

that there will be a need for additional staffing and one new staff in 2016 but the timing of our rad commemorate should line up acquit nicely. >> thank you. >> supervisor mar. >> i had another question to kate howard just a clarification on the office of strategy partnerships it looked like we created last year through grant and general fund money and in this coming year a director position continues 50/50 with general fund and grant funds the positions are taken on is there a reason why not packaging grant funded. >> thank you for the question supervisor mar so the office of strategy partnerships the director position is continuing as the

bftd report have funded by local foundation and have funded by the general fund the other two positions were added related to a grant that the city received from the irvine to exposure paper success strategies that is basically performance based working with social issues it maybe called social impact fund that grant funding. >>was one time in nature and is now expiring what we're proposing in the mayors budget to things one to continue a position focusing on pay for success and strategy finance issues this is a position that focuses on affordable housing accelerate fund to leverage the

private gallon and working 0 on paper success the second position it really proposed as a enhancement to our hope sf program one of the things we've discovered is that one of the greatest challenges facing the hope sf initiative is data sharing between agencies and departments about the people who are residents in our hope sf sites so many of them the individuals that live in public housing are involved in many of the city's assistants ref health care and maybe childcare or maybe involved or a family member on the joyfully justice or probation system and the data saoirse is not consistent so this position will be added in

order to improve that data sharing and doing more things on effecting the program >> thank you for that i'm reading through the budget analyst report so the open data report analyze we passed two years ago is transitioning grant funded positions to the city general funds so it is another couple of positions that are general funded that had been privately supported before; is that right. >> that's a little bit different the open data are two positions that one is essentially mandated as part of open data ordinance adapted by the board in 2014 the second an additional we the mayor's office added because the consent of implementing the open data ordinance as described you'll remember the open data ordinance really 6 key goals

related to increasing the number and timelyness the usability of data and improving the consistentcy and being able the confidentiality and in policymaking and decision makings supporting every department is required to have an open data correspond so the team of two has to have that and such the housing portal when the city adopted the ordinance recommended to open data the mayor's office moved afford with implementation so the addition of those two positions to correct for that their flaunted

a work or the are order with the department of technology. >> i misread the budget analyst report that mixed up the grandfathered position with the new data positions i understand now thank you. >> thank you, ms. howard. >> just to confirm we're working on not in full agreement. >> we're in agreement with the cut recommendations proposed by the budget analyst, the policy recommendations we would not support. >> okay. we'll defer those items next week. >> you can take action on the budget analyst represents. >> mr. rose our report. >> yes. mr. chair and members of the committee incidentally we recommend the proposal that you called mr. chairman for the

record on page 86 of our report our recommended reductions in the proposed is hundred thousand reduction 2016 a one-time savings an increase of $16.6 million in the 2015-2016 budget and in addition, we include $2 million plus in a policy recommendations ongoing savings and 2016-2017 our recommendation include policy recommendations of $2 million plus all of which are owning savings my understanding the department enclosures were you our hundred million dollars recommend restriction in 2015-2016 and the balance they disagree are the policy recommendations not straight recommended kits pointed out to you for policy consideration. >> thank you very much mr. rose. >> supervisor yee.

>> thank you mr. chairman excuse me. i forgot to tell you i had wanted out a new page 87 which explains the policy represents i want to remind the committee you have that. >> oh okay mr. rose you just - can you just kind of i realize what the policy recommendations are. >> the first policy recommendation mr. chair and supervisor yee is on page 87 that's the one i just referred that i handed out to you today it didn't get electronically transmitted we skate quote due to reductions in the block

grants and housing opportunities for persons with aids funding for the 2015-2016 the department will a full with policies historically the city's policy is when grant funds are reduced or limited that the city general fund is not picking up the iron cross we call out to the committee that kind of committee recommendation and if the committee wanted to backfill it that's the committees prerogative we feel it is important to tell you that items which were previously non-general funded items are now proposed to the general fund that's why we've not stated as a plain cut like the hundred thousand dollars other policy recommendation on

page 88 actually, two of them there's two new positions that are being requested as interim hired by the mayor's office in 2015 with an ordinance establishing that kate howard explained establishing the city's policies and procedures an april 16th him, however not gotten the budget approval for that prior to filling the positions and now requesting authorization to add those positions into their budget as an annual additional total general fund cost of $306,000 plus furthermore the open data policy called for the mayor to appoint a chief data office in

the mayoral staff 14 position, however not adding two general positions i believe that many howard believes the mayors buildings they need those additional positions again, we present this as a policy not a straight cut and finally the last policy recommendations on the mayor's office from the strategy aspirins in 2015-2016 to direct did position by this general fund in 50 percent foundation grants which is proposed to continue in 2015-2016 in addition two new positions were financed for the pay for success in 2014-2015, however the grant funding will expire after the first quarter of 2015-2016 and proposed position will be reassigned to the mayors finance department with an

expense of hundred and $85,000 again, a development required our attendance we didn't make a straight cut but presented this to the board of supervisors for your consideration. >> thank you, mr. rose. >> and just want to add especially to open data we approved it it unanimously i know those position are needed for the vision 90 in san francisco to make our government and data more transparent so colleagues, we have a few items first of all item number 11 first to opening it up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so colleagues as the last item lloyd i'd like to entertain a motion and i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. can i have a motion. >> motion and supervisor tang and seconded by commissioner

mondejar we'll take that without objection. with while we're at it. >> mr. chairman did the committee accept the recommendation that the mayor's office agreed with. >> we haven't gotten interest yet while were on the july 1, '46 we earlier in the meeting approved items 6 to 9 and forwarded them to techniques meeting i want to resend that vote and send them to the full board on july 16th instead. >> i'll resend that and move to the full board an july 14th arrest items 6 through 9 and we'll take that without objection. >> okay. now the underlying the proposed cut with the mayor's office for a hundred thousand dollars i'll treason a motion to accept from the budget analyst pend

public comment at the board. >> through the chair i'd like to make that motion but also keep the policy recommendations for further discussion. >> so motion by commissioner tang and second by supervisor yee we'll take that without objection. >> okay madam clerk if you would please call offering we're going to have our board of supervisors right. >> angela here and madam clerk called 17 and 18. >> motion to consider update an $3.2 million cost of living for the analyst services more earlier than 2015 and directing the clerk of the board to amend did contract accordingly and item 18 the process and outcome of the requests for

qualifications members one zero for radio broadcast services and the clerk of the board to network with the pre-qualified sender. >> thank you, supervisor farrell and members the committee here with my administration and finance colleagues to present a quick review the 2015-2016 and fiscal year 2016-2017 budget for your consideration following our 7 slide budget presentation i'll highlight 17 and 18 and before beginning i know that the staff and the office of the clerk of the board are watching thank you to each of them for carefully considering the work everyday and they're wonderful by them and their