that affected the city significantly. so that is why you are going to see that. that would have been the case that system, that database, regardless of any proposal with a needed for all of them. as with the contingency pricing that included here, being able to include contingency which would be needed under any proposal so those are the key excavations of why it is larger and the principal one as well that we are going to for twice as long on the main support at the discounted pricing. >> just a final question. i want to make your comments. did you ask any of the other vendors whether or not they would give you -- were kind of deal they would give you on the expanded scope? >> those terms and conditions were included in the bid. we saw all their price discounts in their bid, and the one before you today was ranked highest to the proposal process. >> i understand the bid, but in terms to the extent you expanded the scope of the contract negotiations, those negotiate did you check with any of the other vendors to see

what kind of deal they could give you? >> we did not go back to negotiating in good faith the highest ranking most responsive proposal. >> banquet >> i appreciate that. with all due respect to the controller and have a lot of respect for that office, i can support that because i do think while it is true that sometimes when you do a competitive bid you end up with a higher amount of the contract that the size of the contract here is such, so significantly higher it is more than double, that, to me it really sort of undermines the point of a competitive bid process, which is that you try to outline a scoping figure out, based on let us go, who is going to give you the best deal. but, when you have a scope get responses to that scope, and then you turn around and actually double the scope from what you started, then you are

talking about potentially a different outcome if you were given those anderson opportunity compete for that increased scope. that is a challenge that i have. i understand the importance of this function, of this contract . i know that we need to act. i just have concerns about the process. another thing is that i do think supervisor kim has raised an important issue about open source. given the length of this contract are we tying our hands when there is a very real possibility that the reality in this industry could very well be different not in 10 or 20 years, but in three, four years. so thank you. >> thank you. seen no other names on the roster, madam

clerk, can you please call the roll. i am 21, supervisor tan aye, wiener aye, yee aye, avalos aye, breed aye, campos note, cushions and aye, cohen aye farrell aye, kim know aye aye.9 aye to knows the supervisors campos and give me dissent >> this resolution is adopted >>[gavel] >> can you call item 22 >> and president >> as advice from city attorney i consulted earlier i do have a family member works for -- we determined is no financial relationship between the two of us and that he is not involved in their prime and there will be impacted by this, but

>> supervisor wishes to be speaking to item 21? >> to the contra, yes >> we have taken a boat. i just got some advice. i determined that it was not an issue so had not brought it up, but mr. -- >> wait before you continue, can we entertain a motion? >> it is just a disclosure but not changing my vote. >> could be -- can you please clarify we need to take this discussion before the vote is taken or after the vote is taken? >> john given her. it is merely a requirement that supervisor christiansen disclose on the record of the meeting to ship it does not matter if it is before after >> right >> okay. thank you. madam

clerk. please call the next item >> and 22 is a revolution to approve the issuance and sale of revenue obligation bonds by the california enterprise developed authority in aggregate principal amount nokes agreed 10 million to finance or refinance the acquisition construction improvement or claimant the key to eight educational facility vital learning center for children. >> rollcall vote. >> supervisor tang aye wiener aye, yee aye, avalos aye, breed aye, campos aye christiansen aye cohen aye, farrell aye, kim aye, mark aye 1100 >> adopted him asleep >>[gavel] >> and 23 is aleutian director willie authorized the district attorney to accept and extend a 110,000 or grant the state to ensure human trafficking

victims receive comments of victim services to enhance cooperation with the mayor's task force on anti-human trafficking through september 30, 2015. >> stenhouse and call. without objection this resolution was adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> this item >> i am 24 resolution to authorize the office of the assessor recorder to accept in-kind gift gift value $20,000 mr. francisco associate of realtors to improve the accuracy of appraising a developing valuations of properties within the city. >> stenhouse and call. without objection this resolution was adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> next item >> i am 25 resolution declared the intent of the city to reimburse certain extent ensures for proceeds of future indebtedness to authorize housing equity development to submit an application and california that allocation limit to permit mortgage

revenue bonds and in aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35 million for 225 go straight to gypsy mouse and call. without objection this resolution is adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> next item >> >> isaac and 26 department of public health to expect $140,000 grant the centers for disease control and prevention. for program. health impact assessment for group continue to advance the practice to achieve health inequity in san francisco to august 31, 2015 >> stenhouse and call. without objection this is aleutian is adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> item 27 please >> item 27, resolution to authorize the conveyance of real property located at 474 bits on the street from the opposite committee investment in infrastructure to the mayor's office of community development and making appropriate findings. >> stenhouse and call. without objection this resolution was adopted unanimously >>[gavel] >> colleagues, organized it over to our 3 pm special order.

mdm. clerk, can you please call item 32 and 33 >> item 32 and 33 comprise a special ordinance 3 pm the board of supervisors will convene a company of the whole pursuant to a motion approved on june 9 for a public hearing to consider objections to report of assessment cost. the subject of item 33, resolution approving a report of assessment cost the sidewalk and curb repairs to the sidewalk inspection and repair program order to be performed by the director of public works . the cost to be paid for out of her revolving fund. >> colleagues the committee as a whole is conducted to hear public testimony on the record of assessment cost submitted by the director of public works. for sidewalk and curb repairs to the sidewalk inspection and repair program and to consider approving the underlying resolution. that is open this up for our hearing. >>[gavel] >> first will hear from the

department of public works. >> thank you. my name is robert quam i am with the department of public works. this report is for property inspected and notified and repairs made to the city under the sidewalk inspection and repair program from april 20 14th through march 2015. during that period the department inspected and repaired sidewalks and curbs in this unique valley, golden gate heights, mission district, along -- street. sunnyside buena vista and other sunset neighborhoods. issuing 3379 notices to repair and also 2105 invitations to agencies. the cost of 1,000,004 $62,000 for

the notices to repair, and it are 52,001 $38 for the -- for a total of two man dollars $2 million. measures 71 invoices were sent out to property owners of which 1697 opry owners paid the city to recover $1,213,000 the balance of the property owners elected to have the city -- drive the cost of the sidewalk repairs based on their property tax or otherwise copied the city to timely manner. in this report we are submitting to and 57 properties with outstanding invoices, totaling $235,000 to be placed

as an assessment on the property tax rolls. as of today, 84 properties were removed from this list either through payment or wall staff is working with the property owners to resolve outstanding issues. this concludes our report. >> thank you. colleagues, other any questions for the department? seeing none open this up to public, good commenters will have up to 2 min. please, line up to my left. per speaker, please. >> a chuckle and strife first our holiness [inaudible] >> sir, you are out of order. this is not general public comments. this is not general public comments. this is public comments on the item before us regarding the sidewalk

inspection and repair programs. next speaker, please. >> my name is joshua josh emmy on behalf of the owner of the property. we are just here to say that we did not get adequate notice to make the repairs and we did meet some repairs that were clear to us, but her parents mother wants and needs to be made there once clear to us so we did not know quite when these to be done. we were willing to pay the balance , we did not get the invoice yet. so if there is a penalty for having it on the tax rate that we would like to. now. >> okay suggests the public commenters want you all to know that there will be an opportunity, after this hearing, is closed to meet with a representative from the department of public works outside of the chamber to try to resolve any issues, any outstanding issues you may have. >> thank you. >> thank you.

>> did upon the public work is a applaud. >> can you move the microphone >> will be an opportunity to discuss her issue department after the hearing. >> neck speaker, please >> want to fix those sidewalks. solid as a rock.. where we all walk. please do not stop. fix it solid. solid as a rock. where we all walk. please do not stop.

>> thank you. neck speaker, please. >> my name is james bannerman the board of supervisors to the condo association that is represented at 3256 16th st. there is no evidence in any recent curb the sidewalk repairs about location and no discussion of this post work in this notice. the only areas that may have been repaired within the last two years is not this property but an adjacent property. we do not recall any issues of any repair being performed were completed in recent memory. in violation of the city's disclosure requirements no specific proposed assessment amounts are disclosed in this notice. any copy of the report of such repairs is attached which contains locations and the tournament do and this is not about notice. the notice

appears to be fraudulent for other reasons as well. the file number, 150541, when the file numbers on the june 17 in the public works calendar are in the 18 000's. this a national notice from the -- is clearly not timely and is not denied as an opportunity to validate work needed and recently our responsibility. to make any needed work ourselves into. the completed work. no hearing is scheduled for -- on june 17 [inaudible]. so, therefore we denied there is no repair done it this property there was repair on the adjacent property but there is no evidence to any repair been done on this property. within the last two years. it is very clear. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker,

please. >> good afternoon. -- liberty street. my sidewalk was repaired at the time of this inspected. it was noted and indicated that it was as a result of neighboring property owners treat. i was told at the time that would not be billed for this, but that the adjacent property owner would be billed. i do not know how to handle this. and i do not know how to take care of this problem in the future. >> thank you. again building opportunity to talk to a representative after the hearing. right outside the chamber, and just once the hearing has concluded. >> banquet >> thank you. next speaker. >> hello, my name is -- him after my mother of garfield street. i am not exactly sure what repairs were done because the sidewalk is still broken. >> thank you. next speaker,

please >> hello my name is -- goldberg can just take it outside >> you can once the hearing, yes you can if you choose to you do not have to necessarily make public comments to talk to the representative from dpw with his hearing has been concluded. >> 1.2 mentioned i never -- to fix the city is to hire the contractor and i refuse to pay the charges. >> thank you. next speaker. >> my name is among -- representing 9690 cumberland homeowners association. our condo is located cumberland and dolores street peanut location is quite a bit of sidewalk there. over the years we received many requests to repair the sidewalk and original time we have done that. we are clean record of always repairing the sidewalks. this past year we received a

bill for trimming our hedge trimming a tree, both which were obscure and it makes sense since we have a monthly gardener and we trim our trees under selective. i try to bring this up with dpw. they said after i provided all evidence is that everything make sense nothing went anywhere after that mr. received another bill. those in september. it happened again a few weeks ago and received another notice. so we do not know how to make recourse to this. >> thank you. next speaker, please >>, resident 609 door st.and just i am objecting to sidewalk repair. it is a excessive cost, and ideas driving families of the city. i would also like to say to the sidewalk was repaired. it cracked. i put a coat on it and is still cracked. we did not plant the trees

there. there planted by the -- their eucalyptus in the total trees. were forced repaired or to maintain them. we just feel it is undue hardship good and quick to ship thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> mimes karen salinger property owner also not having 1235 ohio street. we cannot judge with a city to do repairs on our sidewalk. wrap it up it is bill once the work is done to our satisfaction. example documentation to show that we were in communication. the basis and the work was not completed. will wait and talk to dpw. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> my name is keith from dogpatch specifically minnesota street. i like to submit this into evidence. this is a picture of the sidewalk that

was repaired, but the city was also expanding water main and i submit that would have to be, those sidewalks would have had to be repaired anyway. the only reason i am asking for reconsideration or reduction of the bill is extreme financial hardship. otherwise overpaid because i do appreciate what bt bw does but in all fairness i believe that the sidewalk repairs were not incurred by us. were not created by us, and therefore, perhaps the bill could be adjust. thank you. >> thank you. under any of the members of the public -- sir varga pinup q that was not general public comments. thank you. seeing no other members of the public would like to comment at this time, public, disclosed >>[gavel] >> see no other speakers, this hearing has been held and now

file. >>[gavel] >> mr. quam, july the members of dpw who will assist you with the members of the public and assist with their issues? >> i have one other person, yes >> of it it will give you an opportunity to work those things out and then come back with your recommendations before we move forward. thank you very much. we will now be convened as the board of supervisors return to our regular business.", can you please call and 28 and 29 >> and 28 item 28 and resolution and declared the public interest and necessity demand the construction acquisition movement rehabilitation preservation and repair of affordable housing improvements and related costs necessary or convenient to be financed through bonded

indebtedness an amount not to exceed 3 million. authorized or surpassed 50% of the resulting property tax increase. provide the levying collection of taxes debate both principal and interest on such bonds setting certain procedures in regard to the election. adopting a puppy finding. item 29 was referred without replication, budget and finance subcommittee good is a resolution to german and declared the public interest and necessity demand the construction exposition improvement relocation repair of affordable housing movement related costs necessary or convenient to the foregoing purposes. to be financed or bonded indebtedness any amount not to exceed 350 million authorizing landlord to pass 50% of the property tax increase under the ministry of code providing for the levy and collection of taxes to pay both principal and interest on such bonds setting certain procedures undergarments for the election of adopting findings under the california environmental quality act. and then present, pursuant to government code section 43607 and eight, both of these items will require eight votes for approval.

>> colleagues, can entertain a motion to continue these items one week to the meeting of june 23, 2015? moved by supervisor mar seconded by supervisor cohen. colleagues, did you want to speak before? >> yes. very very briefly. appreciate your motion to continue these items. >> supervisor avalos >> oh i think the mayor's office and the mayor for keeping the door open for discussion on the affordable housing bond. i think it was great to see that there is movement up on the bond. i was hoping it would happen and the controller's office was the on schedule and [inaudible] probably can happen in the next couple of days and interest rate was able to enable us to

increase the size of affordable housing bond that is before us today. in terms of a resolution of necessity. so, i really appreciate that. were all, get the one bonds were going to agree on and get past the eight vote threshold before to discussions further with the mayor >> colleagues, there has been a motion to continue this meeting these two items to the meeting of june 23. can we take this without objection? without objection, these items are continued to the meeting of june 23 2015 >>[gavel] to ship modern clerk next item please >> i am 30 and ordinance to amend the holcombe article 12 c to acquire the new buildings of 250,000 ft.2 or more of gross floor area constructed operated and maintained using available alternative water sources and new buildings saddam 40,000 ft.2 for what budget cultivation of subdivision pools, include compliance to man the public

works go to provide the pipelines and other facility constructed in accordance with article 12 c and located in the public right-of-way. are subject to approval as minor encroachments and exempt from payment of public right away occupancy assessment and affirming the appropriate determinations. >> supervisor winner >> colleagues, today before us is a first of its kind was stationed to significantly increase water recycling in san francisco. specifically, by requiring water reuse and large new developments to require all new developments of 40,000 ft.2 or more to engage in what budget analysis and to make it city policy within five years to only use distilled water for irrigation and cleaning of our parks and public spaces. however think supervisor read avalos, christiansen cohen, and

kemper cosponsorship also want to think cretin in my office to do a huge amount of work to do this groundbreaking resolution for. water is a limited and precious resource. at a minimum, potable water should not be used for flushing toilets, irrigation other uses. california's water shortage is in severe policy price. some called it an existential crisis and is not a temporary problem. the point to some estimates, we may only have a year or two storm water left if this child continues unabated. even when this drought eventually ends, was to be vulnerable to the same water shortage issues and ongoing state projected to come. we need structural changes on how we use this precious resource. you must take aggressive policy actions now, no more waiting -- to conserve water to make the very best and most efficient use of the

limited water we have. last year i have the hearing on the drought. the city is doing on efforts to use non-potable water for public uses the policies we could increment to improve water conservation or reuse inner-city. at the hearing, weird about the qcs on-site water we use program.. through this program developers work with the puc to voluntarily install systems to capture gray water from sinks and laundry, rainwater foundation wanted to use this water for non-potable uses. the legislation before us today would think this program a step further by mandating the systems and new developments of 250,000 ft.2 or more. developers can choose to get either install the systems in their buildings, join with other buildings nearby street a so-called district 1 reuse

system can serve multiple buildings. initially, the legislation only budget buildings in the reclaim water zone, so-called purple pipe zone. as the developers were already required to install purple pipe for water recycling and had been required to do so for many years. after conducting a significant amount of outreach, we stated the legislation citywide. regardless of the location of these new developments, we need to conserve water and make efficient use of the water we have. so does make sense to only apply this requirements some parts of the city. however, to recognize certain developments in the pipeline outside of the reclaim water zone have not been planting to install purple pipe we created a two-tier compliant system. development in the purple pipe some i received building was a permit by november 1 of this year will be required to comply every developments outside of the purple pipe zone that receive the building or site permit after november 1 of 2016, they will be required to comply. the legislation will also require the moment citywide of 40,000 ft.2 or more

to go through an on-site water reuse analysis by the public utilities commission to determine the feasibility of implement such a system and those opponents will then be able to decide whether to do so. the savings from the systems are real. mixed-use development can offset 100% with nonportable demands toward the systems. residential development of 500,000 ft.2 can reduce it potable water use by 2,000,000 gallons a year. in addition to these requirements for new private moments, the city needs to do more to increase its own non-potable water use. the legislation will make the city policy that no more cleaning or irrigating our parks or sidewalks or the public spaces within five years water recycled water, will be required. city governments will have to report back within two years on the feasibility and cost of implementing this

policy. we conducted significant outreach in the development community to solicit feedback to answer questions about the legislation. i want to thank the many many developers and other professionals engaged in the process, and i particularly want to thank housing action coalition and -- for helping us to bring as many developers as possible into the process. we have worked with these developers to answer questions, and addressed concerns to the extent we were able to do so. we also have been working with the public utilities commission to try to lighten the burden on developers in terms of the stolen these systems. we pass the puc and the legislation urges the puc to reduce certain sewer fees in recognition of the reduced impact on the sewer system when the building has recycled water system. the pc