tv [untitled] June 17, 2015 6:00am-6:31am PDT
6:00 am
60 units in the pipeline and thirty households that lost their housing due to an ellis act eviction and committed fund to build housing including over 35 hundred units of public housing we are continuing our asset martin luther king it is over $21,000 housing we have come mentioned predevelopment on at 45 hundred units, we introduced neighborhood preference legislation to help existing san franciscans obscure avenue in the neighborhood in which we live and we work with other stakeholders introduced legislation for a housing bond in november of $300 million we will continue in 2015-2016 to
6:01 am
bring all this work to fruition to get more affordable units on line and continue our transformation of public housing and will begin a new recycle to bring as many affordable units online as quickly as possible in closing as kate howard said we're in agreement with the budget analyst kit recommendations i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you very much supervisor mar. >> real quickly on the small sites shoiksz fund where are those 60 units being acquired and rehabbed. >> approximately, six in the admission and we have units in the castro and selma and in the tenderloin. >> thank you supervisor yee. >> with potential package of
6:02 am
the bond measure in november will this require more staffing. >> we've not proposed new staff for the new bond measure right now our staff i will say is at capacity we're working extremely hard to move the rental demonstration program forward this is very difficult to a staffing effort it is relating short time starting phase one in october and once construction this is relieved to our staff we have phase two starting off that but in construction on phase two in 2016 and once that construction starts our staff will have more room to bring the bond funded projects to predevelopment. >> so would the staff attendance to the bond measure
6:03 am
this is so you have potential bond staffing capacity and in terms of project management the neighborhood preference legislation does acknowledge that there will be a need for additional staffing and one new staff in 2016 but the timing of our rad commemorate should line up acquit nicely. >> thank you. >> supervisor mar. >> i had another question to kate howard just a clarification on the office of strategy partnerships it looked like we created last year through grant and general fund money and in this coming year a director position continues 50/50 with general fund and grant funds the positions are taken on is there
6:04 am
a reason why not packaging grant funded. >> thank you for the question supervisor mar so the office of strategy partnerships the director position is continuing as the bftd report have funded by local foundation and have funded by the general fund the other two positions were added related to a grant that the city received from the irvine to exposure paper success strategies that is basically performance based working with social issues it maybe called social impact fund that grant funding. >>was one time in nature and is now expiring what we're proposing in the mayors budget to things one to continue a position focusing on pay for
6:05 am
success and strategy finance issues this is a position that focuses on affordable housing accelerate fund to leverage the private gallon and working 0 on paper success the second position it really proposed as a enhancement to our hope sf program one of the things we've discovered is that one of the greatest challenges facing the hope sf initiative is data sharing between agencies and departments about the people who are residents in our hope sf sites so many of them the individuals that live in public housing are involved in many of the city's assistants ref health care and maybe childcare or
6:06 am
maybe involved or a family member on the joyfully justice or probation system and the data saoirse is not consistent so this position will be added in order to improve that data sharing and doing more things on effecting the program >> thank you for that i'm reading through the budget analyst report so the open data report analyze we passed two years ago is transitioning grant funded positions to the city general funds so it is another couple of positions that are general funded that had been privately supported before; is that right. >> that's a little bit different the open data are two positions that one is essentially mandated as part of open data ordinance adapted by the board in 2014 the second an
6:07 am
additional we the mayor's office added because the consent of implementing the open data ordinance as described you'll remember the open data ordinance really 6 key goals related to increasing the number and timelyness the usability of data and improving the consistentcy and being able the confidentiality and in policymaking and decision makings supporting every department is required to have an open data correspond so the team of two has to have that and such the housing portal when the
6:08 am
city adopted the ordinance recommended to open data the mayor's office moved afford with implementation so the addition of those two positions to correct for that their flaunted a work or the are order with the department of technology. >> i misread the budget analyst report that mixed up the grandfathered position with the new data positions i understand now thank you. >> thank you, ms. howard. >> just to confirm we're working on not in full agreement. >> we're in agreement with the cut recommendations proposed by the budget analyst, the policy recommendations we would not support. >> okay. we'll defer those items next week. >> you can take action on the budget analyst represents. >> mr. rose our report. >> yes. mr. chair and members
6:09 am
of the committee incidentally we recommend the proposal that you called mr. chairman for the record on page 86 of our report our recommended reductions in the proposed is hundred thousand reduction 2016 a one-time savings an increase of $16.6 million in the 2015-2016 budget and in addition, we include $2 million plus in a policy recommendations ongoing savings and 2016-2017 our recommendation include policy recommendations of $2 million plus all of which are owning savings my understanding the department enclosures were you our hundred
6:10 am
million dollars recommend restriction in 2015-2016 and the balance they disagree are the policy recommendations not straight recommended kits pointed out to you for policy consideration. >> thank you very much mr. rose. >> supervisor yee. >> thank you mr. chairman excuse me. i forgot to tell you i had wanted out a new page 87 which explains the policy represents i want to remind the committee you have that. >> oh okay mr. rose you just - can you just kind of i realize what the policy recommendations are. >> the first policy recommendation mr. chair and supervisor yee is on page 87
6:11 am
that's the one i just referred that i handed out to you today it didn't get electronically transmitted we skate quote due to reductions in the block grants and housing opportunities for persons with aids funding for the 2015-2016 the department will a full with policies historically the city's policy is when grant funds are reduced or limited that the city general fund is not picking up the iron cross we call out to the committee that kind of committee recommendation and if the committee wanted to backfill it that's the committees prerogative we feel it is important to tell you that items which were previously
6:12 am
non-general funded items are now proposed to the general fund that's why we've not stated as a plain cut like the hundred thousand dollars other policy recommendation on page 88 actually, two of them there's two new positions that are being requested as interim hired by the mayor's office in 2015 with an ordinance establishing that kate howard explained establishing the city's policies and procedures an april 16th him, however not gotten the budget approval for that prior to filling the positions and now requesting authorization to add those positions into their budget as
6:13 am
an annual additional total general fund cost of $306,000 plus furthermore the open data policy called for the mayor to appoint a chief data office in the mayoral staff 14 position, however not adding two general positions i believe that many howard believes the mayors buildings they need those additional positions again, we present this as a policy not a straight cut and finally the last policy recommendations on the mayor's office from the strategy aspirins in 2015-2016 to direct did position by this general fund in 50 percent foundation grants which is proposed to continue in 2015-2016 in addition two new positions were financed for the pay for
6:14 am
success in 2014-2015, however the grant funding will expire after the first quarter of 2015-2016 and proposed position will be reassigned to the mayors finance department with an expense of hundred and $85,000 again, a development required our attendance we didn't make a straight cut but presented this to the board of supervisors for your consideration. >> thank you, mr. rose. >> and just want to add especially to open data we approved it it unanimously i know those position are needed for the vision 90 in san francisco to make our government and data more transparent so colleagues, we have a few items first of all item number 11 first to opening it up for public comment anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so colleagues as the last
6:15 am
item lloyd i'd like to entertain a motion and i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. can i have a motion. >> motion and supervisor tang and seconded by commissioner mondejar we'll take that without objection. with while we're at it. >> mr. chairman did the committee accept the recommendation that the mayor's office agreed with. >> we haven't gotten interest yet while were on the july 1, '46 we earlier in the meeting approved items 6 to 9 and forwarded them to techniques meeting i want to resend that vote and send them to the full board on july 16th instead. >> i'll resend that and move to the full board an july 14th arrest items 6 through 9 and we'll take that without objection.
6:16 am
>> okay. now the underlying the proposed cut with the mayor's office for a hundred thousand dollars i'll treason a motion to accept from the budget analyst pend public comment at the board. >> through the chair i'd like to make that motion but also keep the policy recommendations for further discussion. >> so motion by commissioner tang and second by supervisor yee we'll take that without objection. >> okay madam clerk if you would please call offering we're going to have our board of supervisors right. >> angela here and madam clerk called 17 and 18. >> motion to consider update an $3.2 million cost of living for the analyst services more
6:17 am
earlier than 2015 and directing the clerk of the board to amend did contract accordingly and item 18 the process and outcome of the requests for qualifications members one zero for radio broadcast services and the clerk of the board to network with the pre-qualified sender. >> thank you, supervisor farrell and members the committee here with my administration and finance colleagues to present a quick review the 2015-2016 and fiscal year 2016-2017 budget for your consideration following our 7 slide budget presentation i'll highlight 17 and 18 and before beginning i know that the staff and the
6:18 am
office of the clerk of the board are watching thank you to each of them for carefully considering the work everyday and they're wonderful by them and their work i'm able to stand her before you today also competence express our thanks to the controller's office folks and the mayors budget and deborah for their technical assistance and careful review of the recommendations and also indicate we're in agreement with their recommendations first, we'll start with the current years budget for 2015-2016 slide two depicts the current budget $13.5 million of which 75 percent or 10 point one million dollars for employees a
6:19 am
fringe benefit the remaining 25 percent is allocated to four other areas to provide the budget analyst services for the costs for developing the decided comprehensive financial report to support the broildz while to fund other operating experiences for supplies and others work order agreements and this depicts the budget year and out year distributed among the departments it is expected to increase from $13 million plus in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 respectfully the prorls all allocation amongst the division is unchamped in year by year slide
6:20 am
had the review of the boards adjustments on the slide in black those resulted in a budget those adjustments sure the adequate finder by making the necessary adjustments to attrition to include the 3.2 percent cola for the budget and novelist services and the subject of the action item associated with action 17 for the cap per to increase the train the items in red reflect two new budget items 75 thousands to fund the professional contract resulting from the r f x for radio
6:21 am
broadcasting and 4 hundred and 25 thousand in one time funding to the board to key it projects as we begin the prelims of several important italy projects in the department that improves our cooperation and for the departments information i wish to express our appreciation to coit and others for recommending those projects for funding slide 5 depicts the summary of the 2016-2017 our proposed budget for year two a $14.3 million approximately 2 hundred and 70 thousand less than the budget year this slides summarizes the budgets between year one and two the increased personnel costs by lafco and
6:22 am
coit funding in 2015-2016 and as to be routine by the planning commission, and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote important note to make lafco a has not made a appropriate number but those numbers will change slide 6 talks about our departmental information technology update i've mentioned the 5 year plan and as a quick update the cost to maintain our updated legacy systems and seeing compromises in inner finishes or efficiency because of manual processes the city is investing more including the dph merged system and the replacement project and variously t similarly it is a chartered mandated system supervisor farrell we appreciate our assistance with those issues
6:23 am
but in order to keep pace we'll need investments and updated to our infrastructure that providence appraise the short time and long term initiatives which are an, an out growth i wish to say we've secured the coit funding as mentioned previously and to finish our ab phase and the digitalization repository for the historic legislation records and to complete the upgrade of the back office system for the abbott short time initiate through the analysis and scoping effort for comprehensive data for securing the mobile technologies to enhance the legislative tool and new management system and the
6:24 am
long-term assistance will includes engage members of the public to enhanced use of the online public engagement and public form those projects will make the information more meaningful and wild acceptable through the mapping application and public records search portal before moving on to tackle items 17 and 18 that concludes my presentation. for the proposed 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 budget we're happy to answer any questions now are at the end of the next two things. >> first of all, thank you for your budget presentation we're thankful to you just to
6:25 am
reiterate your no agreement with our believe it or not. >> why not move on to 17 additional 18 and go to mr. rose on all the items. >> hold on it second. >> john gibner, deputy city attorney. >> so the budget analyst has a conflict on 18 and advised because that's the budget analyst cola so the budget analyst can give a report on 17 and leave the room. >> mr. rose why not give a report on the entire board of supervisors budget and then item 17 thank you. >> mr. chair and members of the committee on page 93 a recommended reductions to the proposed budget is 22 told us and 167 ongoing savings for one time saves with a reductions to
6:26 am
allow a reduction of 7.7 percent in the 2015-2016 and our recommended rescues for the proposed budget 70 thousand plus in 2016-2017 or of which are ongoing savings i understand the department concurs with those recommendations. >> we did not report on the perspective item your refer to. >> thank you very much mr. rose. >> mr. chair one other thing we have a report on ocii when you consider that item. >> thanks very much why don't we espouse you first first colleagues i'd like to entertain a motion if we're in agreement with the budget analyst and the staff to
6:27 am
supervisor yee. >> in our presentation the cost of living was $50,000 under the budget increase and in i was looking this page it was given earlier has at i guess 12 years of you know budgeted them for all the delays and the initial was 15 thousand increase on this initial. >> this is. >> thank you supervisor farrell to supervisor yee i'm not sure sdaem exactly what page you're looking at happy to
6:28 am
review that. supervisor farrell to supervisor yee this particular autumn pertains to the remainder of annualtion from the first cola provides water to the budget analyst last year this is the second cola the numbers will be different >> okay. thank you. >> okay. colleagues before we get to the legislative items on the underlying budget she's in agreement with i'd like to entertain a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendations pend public comment. >> so on the item number 18 have we we haven't done those yet. >> but if you want to we'll go
6:29 am
to 17 and 18 we'll certainly do that - it's not clear here on item 17 and 18 anyone wish to comment seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so colleagues item 17 as a mentioned earlier the cola for the budget and elective analysts like to make a motion to entertainer a - and i make a motion to approve item 17 and forward to the full board on july 17th so motion empty supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor yee we'll take that without objection. >> okay. on 18.
6:30 am
>> yes. this is a hearing to consider the process and outcome of the rfp for radio broadcast services i've provides water 0 memo to each of your offices that lists the details specifically the colleagues work and the highlights are in cooperation with the various experts we've drafted a comprehensive r f x for the station qualifications and experience that will be necessary to perform this work a multi faucet work to included the direction distribution to the my time culture and outreach force 40 for the platforms and broadcast the service announcements
44 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
SFGTV: San Francisco Government TelevisionUploaded by TV Archive on
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/872c5/872c52de25671487ba6ca5514ef43e8817edd90b" alt=""