their attractive and ms. norton mr. walton ms. wynns dr. murase. >> thank you item p consent calendar resolution severed for board action k-32 commissioner norton. >> yes actually i have a request like a data request about this which is that it is for a school loop, i.e. building it is renewing how loop contract i realize we've not seen an evaluation how school loop st. is working how many parents are using it what's the impact it is having i'd like to see that i know in general i'm a fan the tool as a parent but i think that is definitely depends on where your teacher uses it regularly and exclusively and our school sites uses it i think

that is - i'd like to see some evaluation and data around how it is being used and where can it improve and you know what kinds of initiatives what about put in place to expand the tool my personal experience some teachers use it and some don't. >> commissioner fewer. >> you know that's a good idea because i had an office experience with school loop it is something that we could probably improve on i don't know whether or not it is used more at some schools and speak grades you know is it elementary more and more high school that high school more than elementary so i'd like to see that this is is a community it has the potential to side much more than one way

condominium conversion of a teacher giving information to a parent but ignites or a catalyst i'd like to see that. >> and also i mean what's the how many families are using it like there is lots of data i'd like to see that we don't have to spend a ton of the time but you get the idea. >> one of the things we were supposed to be monitoring process towards can we make it a requirement that everybody uses it to if in the intervening gradually have an impact if we leave it as being voluntary and

never reassess where we are towards the ability to make it commentary we can't get the information what he want to know about the progress. >> i don't want to resolve this issue tonight i'll remind the commissioners we have the budget and closed session following this so superintendent for a response. >> great suggestion i don't want to steal the trirnd from our superintendant would say dying to answer that i want to remind the commissioners we're just finished the first year's laptop initiative 0 all of the secondary administrators and special educators get the laptop and next year the other teachers point a point to commissioner wynns point we'll be able to then make it a requirement that

you know there's a certain amount of updating that happens as the contractual all the time with the caveat district defenses. all the teachers just yet >> just that is a great baseline we'll be able to see the impact of the laptop program. >> okay i believe that will come to curriculum committee at some point in the future. >> i was thinking a written update with the data, however, you want to do that. >> okay. on k-32 ms. fewer mr. haney ms. mendoza-mcdonnell ms. norton mr. walton ms. wynns dr. murase. >> 7 i's. >> we are now on condemn x the superintendent proposals for

first reading i want to remind 5 minutes for public testimony on each the items we'll take that separately fiscal year 2015-2016 annual update of the local update and other control for the office of education and the san francisco unified school district i need a motion and second and so moved. >> thank you this will be back for action on june 22nd for per board rules the discussion is a loud we have two members of the public that want to comment (calling names). >> ms. casco two minutes please. >> hi, i'm here on behalf of the public council i want to say a few things thank you very much

for taking notice off our recommendations we accepted in our letter including the matrixes by sub groups and recurs the out of schools goal for that and also having our goals for foster youth for robust including having the staff trained if trauma regarding foster youth one point that's brought up the need for transparency with the fund especially for the concentration fund it is important that the community can understand how the funds are being allocated thank you. >> thank you very much is mr. bothering us still in the audience not seeing him i understand we'll have a presentation i'd like a motion

and second on the 2015-2016 recommended budget. >> i'll have a vote. >> second. >> thank you very much this too will be back for action an june 22nd so we'll now transition to the el cap but you deputy superintendent mr. lee. >> thank you dr. murase so we have anticipating from years of experience that this particular conversation will take place deep into the meeting we prepared a short presentation for tonight which our chief financial officer will deliver but really our intention primarily is to save most of

substantive conversation formal next tuesday committee as a whole and that conversation as you know commissioners is focused on the el cap and the recommended budget so there's a little bit of information we'll share tonight including the process updates and a little bit of a recap of the committee as a whole that took place last tuesday and we are working everyday on following up on the discussion of the go specific requests for questions that came up last tuesday and be providing more information to all you you by the end of the this week and having the confusion on next tuesday and we'll have a 9 slide presentation. >> before - while we're getting

assists i see nothing around the p subject you said we're to look at it is simultaneously is not referenced here am i missing something. >> commissioner you'll receive tomorrow by e-mail you'll receive a amended strergs of the p spending plan for 2015-2016 that the cac will be reviewing the same information so that information just to tell you what you'll see will include revised spend plan, which you saw in march and april highlights the changes between 2014-2015 and between the spend plan approved in april and the one being recommended now as a suspended spends plan and there will be a brief narrative accompanying each part of the

spending plan not in the april plan that it totals over $4 million and our intention to actually use the same format and use some of the same ways of presenting that information to subscribe some the investments that are embedded between the recommended budget that is going to take a couple of days longer you'll see information about p together and cac will see that tomorrow and over the next several cases general fund. >> we have to introduce it for first responder together. >> thank you, commissioner our recommendation is to consider the boards adoption of the budget of the entire budget 0

for 2015-2016 as encompassing the p spending plan that is entirely an subset of the overall districts briths budget and the discussion tuesday and on the 23rd and the information will make that investment very but that is the districts budget on the 23rd exactly. >> good evening, commissioners so what we lived like to do in a very short presentation and own it up for discussions and questions but quickly recap the june 2nd committee as a whole meeting last tuesday and summarize the process and finalize the el cap and have an

overview of the questions and keeping in mind we also will have a deep dive opportunity for a deeper kind of into the budget at the committee of the whole meeting next tuesday and review i mean final steps so to recap our meeting from last week we met on june 2nd and discussed the el cap and budget specific tapes that were included to the board to the highlights of the governors revisions and talked about the cal stare impact on the sfusd pribt budget specifically on benefit costs we provides water you with some projections the revenue of

2015-2016 as well as the expenditure projections for that year we actually reprinted those relevant slides if you want to refer to them we're going into the level of detail by the revenue projections on slide 6 and the expenditures on slide 7. of this current presentation we provides water you with and we also went through el mounted the financial projection upstairs you've reprinted on this presentation in slide 8 i can quickly project that in a minute we discussed some above fund and

budget proprietors and highlight and discussed the piece professional for the p in connection with our desire to reduce our districts contribution of p to the district channel fund and we also discussed briefly the ene el cap and the process report all this material as well as tonight's presentation are on the sfusd's.org.edu u website interest were several questions from the commissioners at the last committee as a whole the center was primarily on the how the el cap was to be used to

underscore the chronic absenteeism and the other recommended investments and questions simple as that what are the recommended investments especially p was from the general fund and the boards expressed a desire to see the general fund expenditures that were rather the additional modifications to the p expenditure plan that as deputy superintendent lee we'll have that to share tomorrow and then there were questions about workforce housing, the employee assistance plan substitutes technology train and computer science the student assignment and enrollment system basically foreshadowing some of the agenda items we've discuss at tonight's

meeting and then a discussion of the rising transportation costs and how much was set that was trickled to the new contract was extend services how much of the increase related to special education transportation the general transportation we introduced the proposal to have a school marketing specialist and the questions were surrounding how that position will be connected with the school improvement and the site based fund efforts and as you recall we also indicated a revision to the cost of living adjustment from 1.5 foe 1.02 and questions about the department of finance project projection or

so were reliable and the next to researching that question and there were several questions around the utilization of our title one fund in our school district and we have worked with the from time to time office to provide a robs to our questions those were sent out by mr. steely want to say obtain monday >> yesterday yeah. >> and then there was a kind of a broad are question whether the budget will highlight private donations and sustainability we're work on the responded responses to your questions and presenting our responses on the june 16th june 16th calendar meeting that

was reference the general fund revenues for the districts for the current year as well as the next year calendar 2015-2016 the general fund expenditures sorry- let's i need the slide sorry this is the revenue and you expenditure budget i i'll as showing our projected fund balance that is hillside by the shadows of chair unfortunately but you have that in front of you sorry and again i don't want to spend time we've gone through this in great detail suffice is to say we've outlined the enumerated and listed the major areas of

increase for the 63 $.6 million compared to the 2014-2015 year and that's listed on this slide and we presented the projects for the general fund including the variance from year to year and to recap and this is pretty much the same slide we presented at the last meeting to kind of underscore the fact we'll have a committee as a whole open the el cap and budget on the adjoin 16 the second reading will take place on the 23rd of june and that will be the date of the adoption of both the documents we sent the governor will sign the adopted state budget by

july 1st and staff will be working over the summer to reflect any changes that may be in the final state budget and incorporate that into our budget into the extent there will be variance with the - in september, october there will be revised locations sent out to the school site and the revised budget are returned to us in october fiscal office is working as we right now actually before we've started the work on starting for the workforce 2015-2016 and it will be presented due to the state on october 15th and presented to the board the tuesday that is closet to the

october 15th date in december we'll be working closely with the auditors to complete our annual audit and prep the ferries interim report that is due to the state on december 5th and if i ask add. >> couple of things one is that the current draft of theat1 the current draft of the el cap and the budget book you received on friday those are available on the budget page the districts website as well i'd like to make one comment business owner about the budget book if you have started looking at it you've noticed that some

the consent especially around the sf description have to be updated the information you've heard under the item m discussion from the deputy superintendent gerrero and the team. >> (inaudible). >> that's my department. >> i didn't realize for that a dramatic effect. >> i screw want to point out some of that information needs to be just want and will be just want for the second reading but there's a little bit of a work in progress didn't get communicated in time for the printing of the first reading booklet. >> deputy superintendent i asked superintendant that

really cool guy i asked him about this page 67 of that book the one that was proposed budget on the office of family and parent engagement it is zeroed out that a hundred it was hit by a hundred percent and he said to look under another category but i believe that category was number 143 off-street parking we're consolidating but missing over 2 hundred thousand i wanted to lowest the commissioners if they're reviewing the book and see the office of family engagement disappeared i think they're going to adjust that thank you. >> just to follow-up on the sf

t; s there's a reference to the exhibit we it will be included in the second reading. >> let's see kevin was the only other public speaker so public comment is closed. >> and board rules do allow for discussion on these items tonight are try any additional questions or comments commissioner wynns. >> thank you. i would like to oh i want to probe about the title one issue so i have the answers to the questions but i

just want to so the main answer is that our allocation is less but all of those the implications we're using the fund for we're mandated to use the funds are percentages my question is are we getting they add up to more than the allocations are we using a percentage the money we used last year in terms of is the - are these percentages 40 percent directly to schools and 15 percent for administrator blah, blah, blah are they percentages the $2 million or the percentages of those that we have left. >> okay. what our looking at the responses we provides water those are preservation for next year actually. >> so the percentage is the percentage of $11.2 million.

>> whatever our allocation. >> how can percentages audience up for more than the allocation itself. >> you be specific along the right column the amount. >> the totals allocations are $12 million plus and projected entitlement or allocation is $11.2 million and yeah. that's why we have the deficit in red. >> what i'm telling you the above amendments that is added is a percentage are they requiring us to spend more than a hundred percent. >> no a percentage was included because title one is the restricted resources and some percentage requirements on the

total boogs allocation the way it was written to reflect why we had the shortfall because we are funded certain things on title one that exceeds the capacity. >> we're funding our tech avoidance for preschool so those things we're proposing to spend this is sort of the question we don't have to spend or transfer money into title one to spend money we're spend money on preschool in our earlier education department and we've heard we're spending a lot of peace money and general fund money i don't understand why we're calling that a back filing of title one. >> that may not go be the best term but historically the same items at the same amount that

shows if you continue that pattern there will be a deficit of $1.6 million. >> you think this is misleading we shouldn't see or is it that way it is not a good idea to vote on a budget we're spending $1.79 million from the general fund and transferring it into title one theoretically that's the way it is presented at the two budget meetings that seems to me it is wrong i don't see why we're doing that. >> superintendent. >> yeah. so deputy superintendent lee will talk about that. >> thank you. superintendent quickly and we can modify the way of characterized as the a fairly easy thing to had the intention if you think about the

question of giving the revenues we're giving significant revenues what's the expenditure that speaks for on xhoumz those are revenue increases there are a several two 0 which come to mind the largest representative the con restricted fund sources that you are either expiring or being reduced in order to maintain the consistent level of the programming we have to absorb on the general fund the effect of those restricted funds either going away or being reduced the two on the chart they're on the slides are common core state phone or money that

is a two year restricted grant it was eliminated we're continuing those are expenditures and so that is going to take 670-0000 to now under the general fund to continue and in the case of title one not an elimination but reductions in title one of $1 million plus we're not going to transfer into title one but reclasses those and have them charged to increase serviced general fund. >> it seems to me we need to do and in fact at this excuse me. at the previous meeting we characterizations this as back filing title one spend she should say our m s p.s.