i'll be voting for all of these cuts but i want noted i'm voting against the cuts to the health services system. >> okay. so i want to thank you all for your hard work during the course of the year and mr. rose and we're going to take action right now and colleagues i'd like to have a motion to accept the budget analyst's cuts for items 1 and 2. >> so moved. >> a motion by supervisor tang. >> for clarification, is it items 1 and 2 or 2 and 3. >> apologize 2 and 3. motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor mar and we can take those items without objection with supervisor wiener -- >> i'm voting yes except for the health services. and you can note my dissent on

that one. >> okay. we take that vote okay so moved. thank you everyone. appreciate it. if we call item number 6 next we have ocii still. if you want to come up. >> thank you mr. chairman and members of the committee we're in agreement with the budget and legislative analyst's report and thank you for your hard work. >> thank you. can we go to your report on ocii, please. >> mr. chairman the first report on page 157 our recommended reductions total 206, 905 and that's it.

>> okay thank you mr. rose. colleagues if there's no questions we'll open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item 6? >> so. . >> sir, do you have comments on item number 6? thank you very much seeing none public comment is closed. colleagues if no questions or comments we'll entertain a motion to accept the recommendations on item 6 okay. motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. >> supervisor, would you like to send this item to the board of supervisors. >> yeah to the full board on board on july 14th. >> okay let's see madam clerk up next if you could call items -- we'll do items 7 and 8 please.

>> item number 7 ordinance amending the planning of granting legal status of dwelling units and item number 8 ordinance amending the administrative code self-appropriating fund to make corresponding changes to the housing provision related to the citywide affordable housing plan and plan. >> thank you madam clerk and i have the speakers here for item number 7 i believe are in the back of the room and item 8 miss hayward and this is item number 7 and i know you are not doing your budget presentation right now but this is the fee waiver so if you would just speak to it very quickly. >> it is a fee waiver for

legalizing essentially accessory dwelling units and has a minor effect on our budget and action was taken on thursday actually to waive the rights to review a little unusual. but this item last year i think there were 30 something applications totalling about fifty $50,000 so it's a fairly minor item. thank you. >> okay thank you, director. supervisor tang? >> just a question is this a time-limited fee waiver or ongoing? >> it is a a 5-year period. >> thank you. >> okay colleagues any questions or comments thank you very much we'll take miss hayward, item number 8. >> good morning. the item before you this morning is legislation that would correct two technical

anomalies brought to our attention by the controller's office. as you know it's where fees are deposited including and fees generated from the plan areas are deposited into the fund and this draft ordinance would correct two issues. the housing fund is not currently defined in the administrative code only in the planning code and typically specific program funds are defined and governed by the administrative code and that would be corrected by defining it in exactly the same way that other special funds are typically defined and secondly the so-called appropriating language is not consistent in the planning code and the jobs housing linkage fee as well as the

incl u.s. ionary housing fee are called out as self appropriating but refer only to the affordable housing fund otherwise silent as to their appropriation so the larger fund to which they refer to are silent and the draft ordinance would clarify that all of these fees are self appropriating and the two fees and one fund are self appropriating and seeks to correct all of this at the request of of the controller's office and to be clear it in no way alters the allowable expenditures so mainly all of these fee revenues are restricted to use by the mayor's office of housing and community development and the mayor's 's office of community development would continue

to administer the fund this language will remain and be carried over to the to the new definition in the code and would not change any fee or their uses. i'm available for any questions of course. >> thank you miss hayward. any questions or comments? we'll take public comment on items 7 and 8. anybody wish to comment on either of these items? >> [inaudible] [inaudible]. >> thank you anybody else

wish to comment on either items 7 or 8? okay. seeing none public comment is closed . i'd like to entertain a motion to approve these items and send them over to the board meeting for for july 14th. >> okay thank you. motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. madam clerk if you would call items ten and 11, please. >> item number ten resolution designating the exam er the exam er to be the official newspaper and item number 11 resolution designating bay area reporter and sf weekly and jasmine media and potrero

. >> okay thank you. >> good morning supervisors i'm the assistant director of the office of contract administration this is requesting your approval for official newspaper advertising and the estimated value is approximately 330 $330,000 and spending on this contract has declined significantly in recent years due to an increase in public notices posted on the city's departmental websites thank you and in 20 ten a board resolution changed the admin code for the reduced spending of official advertising with the current legislative requirement we expect it to to hold steady in the coming

years. it would expire june 30, june 30, 2016, and per the requirement oca is required to conduct a competitive solicitation and evaluate the responses and recommend the highest scoring responses for contract award. this year we received bids from the examiner and chronicle. san francisco chronicle is considered a non responsive bid because it does not meet the requirements of being printed within the city limits. the board has the discretion to award the contract as you see fit to serve the city's need for public noticing. it was previously awarded in in 6 months increments to both

bidders and the examiner has received the award and the san francisco chronicle has received the award for 6 months and if you are interested, i have additional information and point scores per the requirements and i'm joined here today by members of my staff and i'm here to answer any questions you may have. >> colleagues any questions? and you are also going to speak on item 11 is that right? >> correct. >> item number 11 is the contract for outreach for newspaper advertising and it's estimated that the annual value of the contract is approximately 15 thousand and the purpose of this contract is to reach a range of separate and diverse communities with information about the city's activities and operations this contract is for the fiscal year of

2015 and 16 again beginning july 1st , 2015, , and , and expiring in june 2016 and it's to evaluate responses and recommend the highest scoring responses for the contract award this year we reached out to fifty local newspapers inviting them to bid and received only 12 bids from the newspapers. here are a list of bidders for this outreach advertising. you will see that they are a range of communities served by the current bidders african-american and spanish as well as lbgt and if you are interested i have more information regarding the

bid evaluation for for your review and technically only 6 of the bidders are deemed responsive that the newspaper be printed locally and weekly and some newspapers are printed outside of the city limits and others are printed monthly instead of weekly and what's included in the evaluation as in prior years the board has the discretion to award the contract as you see fit to serve the city's needs for public notices to diverse to diverse communities and historical this contract has been awarded to most or all bidders and add additional outreach newspapers if you feel that the needs of the community would be better served.

i'm sorry i meant the west side. twin peaks and sunset. >> we reached out to as many as we could we can work on finding a way to include them as part of the group but right now these are the only ones we have received. >> can can we make an amendment then to reach out to west monthly and the sunset beacon? >> okay we will do that. >> just for clarification purposes, if we did amend to that affect would that allow them to come under this umbrella if they became a

responsive bidder to you? >> right we would reach out and work with them correct. >> okay all right. any further questions or comments. okay we'll open this up to public comment on items ten and 11 please. >> advertising neighborhood advertising. i submit in english and i know they would never publish my paper it's disappointing. they never published my paper or even have an interview with me and funds if you understand this is all too limited.

[inaudible]. >> thank you very much. is there any other members of the public that wish to comment on items ten or 11? >> hello i'm with the san francisco examiner and weekly san francisco examiner is the highest circulated newspaper in san francisco. we out circulate our competitors by 75 thousand on sunday and 55 thousand on thursdays and 15 thousand monday tuesday wednesday and friday. our newspapers is free. we concentrate on san francisco's knews and the great thing about a free newspaper is it gives every person in san francisco the opportunity to pickup no matter what your financial means are and in addition to that we have a pick up rate

on the racks and it gives a benefit to the city by being able to read the city's message and stepping over to the san francisco weekly we do have coverage on the west side. it said the circulation was ten thousand and that's incorrect we circulate 70 thousand of those weekly every week and 64, 300 of them are in san francisco proper and 66 thousand are in the east bay locations so i just wanted to clarify that. >> thank you. anybody else wish to comment? >> good morning i'm from the san francisco chronicle on behalf of myself and

colleagues i want to thank you for considering the san francisco chronicle as one of the recipients of this type of advertising we take an active role serving our communities with pride and dedication as well as civic and social responsibility and it's a definitive voice for the region and we reach more than 57 percent of the adult population in the county and vote in local elections and we're proud of the san francisco season of sharing fund raising money for bay area communities this past year and a contributor to the city's food bank and we created sf local and instead of celebrating with a small gathering we threw a party

for the city. we appreciate your trust in the chronicle and the business relationship we've had over the years. we'd like to ask you to award us the full advertising budget and we're confident we can serve you well and keep the residents of our great city city informed and engaged in matters of importance. >> thank you. anybody else want to comment on items ten and 11? okay seeing none public comment is closed and we'll have a few amendments here and we're doing the chronicle and the examiner as in prior years past is my understanding so we're going to use the examiner for most of this year and go back to

using both of them is that correct? >> correct. >> why don't we take these separately colleagues and we're going to endeavor to send out as committee reports so could i have a motion to approve item number 10 for tomorrow's board of supervisor's meeting? >> members of the committee. just if you were going to move item number ten and you are going to split between the two papers i'd recommend you amend it today to include the two papers and i do have amendments here if you are interested for for the clerk. >> thanks we'll do that. okay. let's entertain a motion to that effect. >> through the chair i'd like to make a motion to amend

item ten to include the chronicle so it's split between the examiner. >> okay we have a motion by supervisor tang to reflect what we've done in past years and we can take the amendment without objection and that's the underlying item as amended and we can send to tomorrow's bored of supervisor's meeting and okay colleagues item 11 neighborhood outreach. do you want to propose the amendments? >> i'd like to amend item 11 to include chinese outreach and second supervisor yee's motion. >> okay can i have a second by by supervisor mar we can that i by supervisor mar we can take that without objection. do you want to clarify your motion supervisor yee? >> i'd like to include the

west portal monthly and the sunset beacon do outreach to them and consider them as a possible newspaper to do advertising for the city. >> okay we have a motion by supervisor yee and seconded by supervisor tang and can take that without objection so colleagues as amendmented item number 11 is a committee report for tomorrow's board of supervisor's meeting. we can take that without objection. okay. thank you very much. . we're not ready for item 9 yet, correct? >> correct. >> okay. colleagues at this point in time, we're going to allow these departments to continue to have discussions with mr. rose's office and we're going into recess until 1 o'clock and we're going to

hear items 2 and 3 and we have item number 9 left and a motion so look forward to seeing everyone back at 1 o'clock and at that at that point we are in recess. >>