now opened on item number six and any member of that public that would like to comment. >> seeing none we will close. >> and colleagues if we could have a motion to approve? >> i move approval. >> and seconded by commissioner kim? >> and we will have a roll call vote? >> same house same call. >> item passes. >> thank you. >> next item please? >> item 7, recommend adopting the propose ad fiscal year, 15, 16 annual budget and work program and this is an action item. >> deputy director, for the administration, and what you have before you is the action item to adopt the proposed fiscal year, 15/16 annual budget and this item was brought to you for a preliminary review last month, and what has happened from this point from then to this point is that we have updated the numbers, and we have updated the numbers by 21,554 dollars, and this is a net change from

additional revenue sources we have received and we have received the commitment of up to 200000 dollars from sfmta and the planning department. and $100,000 each, for the sf champ, and san francisco, demand forecast modeling and what this 100,000 dollars from each of the agencies will help to contribute with the care and the maintenance and the up date of the champ model and we are, we will be able to implement the new relevant, features and reporting tools and a much, much, more. and now, this comes out at a crucial time since the state's planning and programming and monitoring sb 45 funds for this fiscal year is to be received for the transportation and we have received, 400,000 for this type of funding but because of where the state is, we will not be receiving any, this allows us to shift other funds that we have, the federal surface

transportation programming, and three percent grants, and we will be able to save these funds, since we are receiving the additional contribution, from the two agencies and be able to save these for the future projects and the future upcoming projects in this coming year or future physical years. ei also would like to, we also have a presentation from last month and commissioner campos requested additional information regarding one of the line items in the budget. and i would like to bring your attention to page 7 of the powerpoint presentation. and this represents a pie chart of the prop k sales tax capitol budget expenditure and it is $135 million and he specifically asked for what pieces of this and what, what are the funds going to? and as you can see from this, chart, 25 percent of it is going to the sfmta vehicle, procurement, and ten percent is

going to the radio communication system project. and the transbay terminal, and the cal train receives ten percent and the brt will receive 7 and parkway will receive 7 percent and all of the other projects will receive the remaining, 41 percent and that includes, street resurfacing, and the state of good repair and the muni forward. and for you these expenditures represent and anticipates 53 percent of future allocations that will come forward for the board for a full approval. and our estimates are from and the reimbursement for the past fiscal years and received on a quarterly basis and any additional sponsor information and the adopt the strategic plan and the five year

prioritization programs. and with that, if there is not any other questions, and i would like to and end my presentation. >> no other questions here? >> thank you. >> great. >> so this item is now opened for public comment and any member of the public who would like to comment? >> and seeing none, we will close the public comment. and we have a new house, and so the first the motion from commissioner campos and seconded by commissioner kim and i will have a roll call vote. >> item seven, commissioner avalos? >> aye. >> commissioner, campos. >> aye. >> cohen. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> and commissioner, mar. aye. >> mar, aye, the item passes. >> okay, very good, we are going to the next item and item 8, introduction of new items and this is an information item. colleagues any new business, commissioner kim? >> no. i don't have any new business,

but i did want to make a motion to rescind the consent calendar to do a full vote on that item. >> the public comment is open. >> none forward, and we will close public comment and, so we have a motion from commissioner kim to rescind the vote on the consent calendar. >> seconded by campos and we do that without objection. >> and so, now a revote on the consent calendar. >> okay on the consent calendar, nexter avalos. >> aye. >> campos. >> aye. >> cohen. >> aye. >> kim. >> aye. >> commissioner mar. >> aye. >> the consent calendar passes. >> okay, very good. and our next item. >> nine, public comment. >> general public comment is now open. any member of the public that would like to comment, seeing none, we will close, public comment. and next item?

>> item 10, adjournment. >> okay, thank you very much we are adjourned.

>> okay, the meeting will quh to order. this is a spsh meeting of the government

oversight committee for june 11, 2015. i'm supervisor yee and and the chair thof committee. to the right and s supervisor christensen vice chair and supervisor breed is on her way. there committee clerk is erica major. the committee would like to acknowledge the staff at sfgtv, john stokes and jessie larsen wloo record each of our meet jgz make the transscripts available to the public on line j >> please silence all cell phones and devices. [inaudible] to bhee included as part of the file should be commit today the clerk. items acted will appear on june 23 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated >> could you call item 1

>> item 1 is woods_670@hotmail.com [inaudible] referring to basically says that we can collect 1.86 cents per scare foot for residential development squz over 10 units and 93 cents for projects below 10 units. for non residential developments we could collect 1.59 cents per square feet. this is to expand in the areas

outside of incommittee plans. it generates-if this were to happen if we maximize our fees to these amounts we could generate an additional 5 million in the next 7 to 10 years that could be used for child care facilities. i believe the sit a has struggled in the last year to meet the demand for child care. the infant toddler and preschool age in the city increased by 10 percent from 37, 890 to 41, 340 between the years of 2000 and 2010. according to the cheerns cancel [inaudible] topped 3500 names. the reason we see this

level is our inability to build new child care centers and according to the low income investment fund, nearly 9 million in reyest if child care capital projects were made for fiscal year 15, but only a little more than 2 million was mail available chblt therefore i would like to insure we can expand this fee to cover new commercial and residential development to be tibel build new centers and expand the capacity of existing centers. i want to do that without compromiseing our ability to continue to build housing in the city that is facing a unprecedented housing crisis. especially since the needs of the spaulsh residential buildsers and that is why i want to create a smaller fee for projects under 10 units.

colleagues we will hear from the selection of developers if they are here. city planning was not going to be here, so-is there any developers here, that were invited? i see none, so colleagues we have any comments? okay, so is there public comments for this item? it works. >> good afternoon my name st. candous wong and director of child care facilities fund. thank you for moving for the next study is long overdue. in the city we are very prosprss

and see creating everywhere and grouth in the city and we haven't had the opportunity to keep up with the growth if cliled care and i think it is opportunity be tibel collect additional fees to help support child care development which is needed. it pshzs the city for opportunity for leveraging growth at the state and federal lechbl where there haveinate been facilities we lost on those opportunity y. think with the improving economy we'll see more of those opportunity. i think there is also the issue of the fact we do have 9 million dollars of requests on the current pipeline because there were not resources available some projects will not happen or be deferred and if there were resources we would be aivl to move some of the projects forward. thank you >> thank you any other public comment? seeing none public comment is closed. i want to

say that the purpose of this hearing is to allow for the public and developers to-if they had concerns about the next study and i want to say that in order to expand the child care facilities funds to match up with the latest studies around child care futillsies there will be legislation introduced to make that happen and looking forward to introducing that piece of legislation in the next few weeks. without any other comments we'll move on to the next item. >> would you like to make a motion? >> um, let's make a motion-somebodyp to make a

motion [inaudible] okay. no objection, motion passes. madam clerk please call items 2-6 >> item number 2-6 are ordinances adopting and implementing memorandum between the city and count of of san francisco. >> is martin grand from the dh apartment of human resources here? he is not here. knepublic comment from 2-6? seeing none public comment is closed. colleagues any thoughts? sorry president breed, thank frz joining us >> thank you. it was my understanding we would get a presentation for the items, is that not going to happen today? >> that was my understanding

and martin grant from the department of human resources was supposed to be here and he isn't here >> should we continue the heightms. i guess we can take a break our resrs until he is here, but ultimately that was my expectations and i'm not certain i'm comfortable voting these out of committee until we have- >> let's resess this and continue on. >> okay welcome back, apologize for the delay there was confusion about the timing of everything. we were on item

2 i believe. 2-6. at this time i would like to invite martin graham flaum the department of human resources who will be presenting on these items >> thank you mr. supervisor committee members and the chair, i'm martden graim rr relations drecktder for the city dhr. today we are before you a package of contract successor mou contracts and also amendments to existing mou's in addition the [inaudible] ord nns. those are different agenda items, but if i can speak to each of them at this point with your permission i'm happy to do so. the first 2 items are 2 contracts negotiated with the cities physicians and dentists and veterinarians. this is a unit

that is primarily represented by or primarily employed by the department of public health, the physicians and that's is the biggest group here. the contract provides for a continuation of wages for the biggest group, the physicians to be commence rate based on a arbitration awarded inl the last year which pegged salaries for physicians in dph to salaries of the highest paid rn classification, the nurse practitioners so that has continued for the award. the other units were given-the other members of the bargain unit thrks non physician which leaveathize animal care office and animal control and veterinarians get the [inaudible] in the local 21 and other contracts with the city.

they are approximatetly 2 coming [inaudible] in the one and one is 3.25 percent and the next is subject to a formula so nothing groundbreaking in the economics. you see from the controllers report these contracts fit into the cities pattern developed last year for labor. the second or third item on the agenda is a amendment to put pin wage rates for new apprenticeships classifications for the labors union, so we are happy we are able to negotiate a strong apprenticeship agreement with the labors local 261 and when we do that the [inaudible] that have to go into the the contract the wages and benefits we put that in the contract so

happy to do that at a modest cast as you will see from the controllers report. the next item is the h 1 firefigeter paramedic squz the hr paramedics are only 3 active members, but it is updated so that it keeps pace with the other firefigeter contracts both in terms of the term on the agreement and ending of one of the benefits, the sunset of the wellness proposal dating back to the early 2000 [inaudible] extend the cost of living increase in the other labor igruments, so is it, a modest package this year. >> okay, any questions? seeing

none i think we went through-i'll do this again, any public comments on this item? skiing none public comment is closed. anyone like to the make a motion to move the items for recommendation and send them as a committee report to the next bord meeting? no objection, motion passes. thank you very much mr. graham. madam clerk are there any other items? >> there is no further business >> okay, meeting adjourned. thank you very much.

issue. >> homeless in san francisco is a challenging issue that effects owner in the city in many different was as of the 2014 homeless census over 64 homeless in individual in the city to try to address the issue we've got a program for chronic homeless welcome to the navigation center. >> this pilot project is for people living on the street what makes it different the navigation center is able to accommodate homeless encampments lowell u allowing people to keep their pets and bring their

personal bloonlz. >> the full realization that people don't want to be homeless not refuse services but from the services don't meet them and not relevant they're not going to be successful if you look at the budget losses we've got a community sacrifice important people to get food and laundry we're standing next to the bathrooms it is designed to be a dynamic and brief residential experience where right of on this site city staff to connect you to homeless places to return to family dine is up for medi-cal and all those things that are complicated for people. >> the other exciting thing city agencies come on site and provided the services for folks this is existed to see when the goal of streamlining a a whole processes of getting people on

go gentle assistance into housing as much as possible. >> way totally different you can come and agree as please and get laundry services and showers any time of the day and night it's twenty-four hours a day whatever and twhefr it's not like any other she recalls. >> they come and help people for what it is they're required the issues they need and reach out and do what we can to say okay how can we accommodate you to get you set up and straight never in my mind imagined a program like this this place it different and a a lot a lot that better it works. >> the navigation is center is a collaboration of partnerships too city departments one is the

homeless outreach team managed by the san francisco distributing i look forward to the navigation center we'll have our agents go out and help and say don't go anymore over and over send our dayshift out they've meet the population and hang out and hang in the encampment and transport people and be with them and make immediate impacts with me and my staff. >> bringing our wloongz whatever you go presents a problem this place their help with the storage i don't have to worry about it staying here you know you're getting things done they need to get things down done to get off the street avenue of the hope alsoness is

gone. >> they help you if you're hungry go eat if e you need to go places go. >> they're 4th district it awe auto. >> it was funded through a unanimous donation and of may 2015 an additional $3 million to help to continue the program beyond 18 months. >> you see people coming out they're ready to being so the future homes you know how variable the navigation center is my message for the constituents yes something can be done do break chronic homelessness it is being done. >> this is a community that sets an example but i how to pick an area that was funky they've seen we're trying to do is help their neighbors they've

seen getting sicker and more frail and broken down on the streets and welcomed us that's a powerful statement people are exist and president in they're becoming to see the movement for folks and people on the streets are only survival modes where is there next meal and their itch more carefree. >> the staff here is interpretation the first day i have a appointment and everything was made all you do is go through them this makes a huge difference. >> to get settled in a helping hand to get on my feet take care of the issues i have and

get out of bed and help. >> even though the navigation center has been up in march 2014 the program is creating successful outreach for it's clients. >> a month ago they came to me and asked me to go into a new program i moved into here and now 3 months later i have my own place it is mine i lock my door don't worry about my stuff it feels human again so you can't save money? it's easy as pie! brown bag your lunch instead of going out. six dollars saved timed 5 days a week times ten years is 21,000 bucks! that's a lotta lettuce. small changes today... big bucks tomorrow. feed the pig.org.

today, we're honored to have mayor ed lee here to present the city's budget for the next 2 hundred and 50 millin dollar years mayor ed lee welcome floor is yours. >> thank you good morning, everyone. >> good morning. >> thank you supervisor president london breed and budget and supervisor mar farrell and members of the board our elected the officials and commissioners and department heads and labor our wonderful community leaders thank you very much for being here and thank you all for being such a great partner in helping me deliver to the people of san francisco a balanced budget that sets our