. >> for thursday, june 25, i'd like to remind the members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. proceedings. and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. i'd like to call roll at this time. commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner moore and commissioner richards we do expect commissioner hillis and commissioner johnson we don't expect commissioner president fong to be present commissioners, that places you under your is items for continuance item one at 1444 discretionary review is proposed for continuance jill july 16th

and case no. 2 for bay street is proposed for continuance until july 6th and next is order court discretionary review and various to august 15, 2015 next at order court discretionary review and variance are proposed for august 13, 2015 item 5 for has to do with i didn't discretionary review authorization is proposed until august 1, 2015, and item 6 ab at silver avenue planning code zoning and confusion are

continued until august 15th further under our discretionary review claurdz item 18 ab at jackson street discretionary review have been withdrawn. >> thank you. >> any public comment on the continuance calendar? chris parks >> hi good afternoon. i'm chris parks the dr requester for the 2224 order courts i supported the continuance i am i and others neighbors hope to have input to the planning department this is being revised in the neighborhood the project sponsor informed me the revised plans will be sent and we expected to see them weeks ago and tuesday we didn't receive them yet we need them and the

amount of time perhaps 10 days or more to have an opportunity to provide input self-we may have it opportunity thank >> is there any additional public comment seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner richards. >> move to continue item 1, 2, 3, 3 ab and 4a and 5 and 6 ab. >> second. >> on that motion commissioners to continues as proposed commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 4 to zero and zoning administrator, what say you? >> continue items 4 ab to the dates specified. >> commissioners under commission matters for the draft

minutes. >> any public comment on the draft minutes? public comment is closed. >> do i hear a second. >> second. >> thank you commissioner antonini on that motion commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 4 to zero and places you on item 8 commissioners questions or comments and commissioner moore. >> i'd like to ask the director for input walking downtown yesterday others lunchtime i realize there are a number of uber cars circling the block and we have advance and do pass consent to parking spaces you were a substitute taxi company not enjoying the zones identified for the parking of

vehicles to transport others i'll looking this as contrary to our transit policy first, because one transit is supposed to be what we use downtown in the middle of the day the circling of uber cars is more than questionable particularly when others cabs are waiting in the appropriately identified zones i want to make a comment i believe the increasing number of uber cars is started to visualizely be in contradiction to our transmitted first policy. >> thank you commissioner richards. >> yeah. this morning chronicle i picked up and there's a tv show called million dollar and the follow-up kathleen writes

the article and if you read the article here's the it was a house on tenth avenue it got $3 million the whole article goes through properties listed slightly going way way over i studied economics in school and a.d. nausea the markets is losing logic and driven by money i like the property what's another million dollars so the premise around splidz the whole rational marlth is in my opinion starting to erode when i see things like that happening. >> thank you commissioner moore. >> i read yesterday's article on the old ensdaurgsz historic

site i wanted to make sure we're seeing a move by the planning department will by the mayor's office to look at it this property more closely since unbeknownst to me it is a city owned site it is a great opportunity to compliment other restored buildings in the area i'd like us to get an update or any kind of idea that arises of the department itself. >> thank you commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i saw that and i'm supportive of whatever the city can do to make sure this gets restored and i like the idea of at least part of it san francisco history museum because there is none in almost any other city there are museums for that cities history very interesting in yesterday's

chronicle by john king on i think this is 460 fulsome a future project that will be coming before us because we have to approve a part of it but the rest of transbay didn't come before us for decisions as far i know i'll ask the department to get an update on the transbay situation so we can kind of factor in the developments that are occurring and in other areas around the transbay region so we can get an update that would be great. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we can move on to department matter directors announcements. >> good evening, commissioners just if i could on the last item commissioner antonini the commission asked a while ago for

the mission bay update we have a transbay one coming up you do see part of transbay the original transbay redetriment is not in usual jurisdiction it will come to you not for the planning code amendment per say but the height differences that is proposed on that project we'll make sure we get it calendared i wanted to take the opportunity to introduce you to the interims i'll ask them to stand up we have 15 summer sgrirmz along with others 7 or 8 sgrirmz i'll read their names

(calling names) this is a slew of projects they're working on the shoreline work for market street protocol and the living on the - urban forestry and green roots the survey project and the storefront survey and some transportation planning all of them are present by the planner who supervisors their work they'll come to the historic preservation commission and attending meeting and in the summer they'll present their projects to the staff during a series of presentations and the commissioners are encouraged to attend thank you all for your work and hopefully that will be

a great inheritance and thank you to 89 in a more organizing the logistics. >> well, i hope you enjoy your summer. >> commissioners on item 10 for mission bay this is an informational presentation. >> good morning this is an informational presentation on the public art as part of the mixed use development on mission street and leo representative from the project sponsor will provide on overview of the art in january of 2012 it was approved a conditional use and authorization for a construction of a hundred and 50 military story use with a hundred and 90

affordable units and commercial space the project is currently under construction and will be completed at the end of july the project required as a condition of approval a public art component equal to the hard construction costs the project manager will install a wall sill yet for requirements projects condition of approval that the final art concept and location be submitted by the planning director in communication with the planning director and we're seeking comments to the concept and the installation that concludes my presentation. i'll now i'm going to turn it over to my colleague. >> thank you >> mr. shep land.

>> i can give you a brief overview of the project itself. >> so the project will be - >> if you could pull the microphone over, please. >> the project is currently installed at a private residence in la and transferred here with panels and installed on the corner of tenth and jessie and the art will expand the

entire height of the empowering and assessable for on the corner of tenth and jessie and if you have any additional questions i'm happy to provide information so on the confusion. >> any public comment on this item. >> public comment is closed. commissioner richards >> just one question the art is great unfortunately, we have people carrying around paint is there a way to protect the art. >> they will treat the art with graffiti a treatment that will you know make any are graffiti this is hopefully be none but as a treatment that will make any graffiti easier to remove that's

the responsibility of the management. >> great, thank you. >> thank you commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i had a question as to the location it's hard to tell is this the exterior wall are we looking introduce the wall of the interior wall you. >> it's the exterior wall this is the floor plan to get an idea so the art this is the floor plan of tenth street and jessie and mission. >> you have to zoom out a little bit. >> okay are i think i understand where the location is that's a wall that will not be glazed anyway, if the art was not there i was thinking the downside not a vision into the building but interest is not any. >> only the this exterior. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you for the

presentation. >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we move on to item 11 past event of the board of supervisors and board of appeals no historic preservation commission yesterday mr. star (laughter). >> hi i thought that would go longer this is aaron happy pride at that weeks land use commission the landscape planning with the amendments to the planning code and that is the roanoke city and general plan as the rincon hill area plan the straight was development by the planning department in partnership with the public works and the commission adapted ordinances in march and at land use commission

no comments and supervisor kim expressed here strong desire to see the plan implemented to supervisor kim's recently passed vision zero and her intiefrz to see this directed through the budgetary progress and boy scout on harrison street is in the extension plans of the neighborhood it is not and the maintenance of the landscape design tuesday not the city's responsibility they voted to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation at this week's board of supervisors they've heard the street tree ordinance that transfers the street tree requirement from the planning department to the department of

public works it passes it's first read and the conditional use for residential mergers sponsored by commissioner avalos also passed and waiting for the mayors signature it will control that within 10 days of the action or when the mayor sends his approval one introduction this week the amendment to the planning code for the restaurant or a bar to open a in the special use district spordz by supervisor christensen and you'll remember it from a couple of weeks ago when a planner presented to you or to you that concludes my racks thank you. >> the board of appeals met a couple of items of interest to the commission first the board many an informational presentation from the rent board and with respect to the removal of illegal in-law units and for

28 broadly restrict street before you last year one the elements was the dwen from 1 to 2 unit they come down out of it was broke out to you for another rebates last year the board denied the rehearing pending the interim controls by commissioner avalos would have required a conditional use authorization but not effective cal listen street was construction you heard last year the board heard this in early may and had unconcerns to rise the design project manager lowered the height of the building and made set back and removed the penthouse this does in the address all the concerns of the appellants and the appellants were not supportive of revised plan the board upheld the plans

with the revised plans and 10 valencia was before the board last night for the consideration of funding this was previously decided by the board the project is in construction due to a lawsuit the courts re3457bd that back to the board of appeals one the concerns was the bridge and the difference between the delegations deliberations and the findings so the board adapted the finding amazing lastly 2251 greenwich street the fire station rebuilt it location this is not before you but there was an appeal of the environmental review to the board of supervisors which was amazing upheld as the correct determination last night the board of appeals upheld it for the reconstruction of fire station for the safety

concerns that's all. >> thank you commissioner antonini. >> yeah. was there any discussion because i familiar with the firehouse the housing for the firefighters so they're trying some kind of different system i'm not sure that is part of the appeal the rank and file was not too happy with it. >> the concerns from the neighbors were largely relate to the process and concerns about the lack of adequate notice for hearings with the arts commission with the design committee board had concerns with how the department of public works did the outreach for that but felt overall the permit was appropriate issued there was comments made about that and the existing building

was built in 1938 when the men in the fire department they made revitalizations and the 90s for the fire department most o mostly the reasons for the rebuilt in their not adequate facilities for the apparatus while the wildlife rescue and other things that are operated not discussion about the housing the firefighters in this location. >> i was aware there were concerns with the facade and that may have come up in the destructions and apparently, this is the system firefighters will have to share the same accommodations and they didn't like that that that was part of the discussion. >> no concerns and the board those add point blank what they wanted changed not specifications by the

appellants. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further we'll move open to general public comment this time, members of the public may address the commission items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. we do have 2 speaker cards. >> georgia and sue hester. >> good afternoon. i sent you all an e-mail i don't know if you had a chance to read it sorry it was long i left out 168 jerseys i want to read you the permit it says horizon and vertical a new two story addition and the conversion to garage and the remodel of existing space addition of 3

bedrooms and bathrooms on the third-story here it is i've hone it to you before this was how that was the original house right there this year it is during the construction another picture right there not much left and here it is today those to they're putting in the windows if i go to the noah valley farmer's market you'll see it from the rear just to let you know this building is flat that is 6 units this 1235i789 is remodels it's attention a big 6 unit the other thing i want to point out this is a case study and the problem my hope is that somehow things like that can get greater scrutiny it sends off an alarm

to the staff this is a demolition this one i haven't sent to you it is take care are a flats sold recently, there is it is to doors i looked the plan it is one door they're putting the other unit adopt that's the other issue their absorbing smaller units into the luxury building i wanted to bring a picture i took this bay is gone and the whole thing gutted i think i was really glad that thing in the chronicle was brought up by commissioner richards this is related not a rational a capping in the mission it is stuff on micro scale that is impacting the whole city effecting the whole city like ebbs is crazy like in

the gold rush i'm hoping the staff looks at the alteration scrutiny a demolition those huge excavations happening in noah valley i've put it all in the e-mail thank you all very much. >> thank you. >> and this is a -

>> those seem to have shrunk sue hester oh, my time is can i start again? i'm being cheated i was waiting to have my thing on there can i please start >> fine this is yours this is - >> thank you my name is sue hester i sent a letter to the planning director and the zoning administrator and it was a letter to the city attorney i have asked the city attorney to if you arely consider the enforcement against the academy

commissioner antonini the click that's why you don't get a copy they've been acquiring property and approving property in violation of law in the earlier 1970s there was a large controversy in the city post secondary universities the university of california and hospitals were acquiring housing expanding their physical plant and it became 0 controversial that the law was changed what the attachments are to my letter is the initial presentation about 6 months into the controversy by allen jacobs the planning director by planning decoration ago the second bit of my attachment is a legislation that was

carried by then supervisor quinton and took effect in the middle of 21st century 197 of a 3 year process when they adapted the institutional master plan owners the city was really aware that post secondary institutions the academy of art could wipeout housing stock it's not in the overhead all of of of those are housing acquired by the academy of art they've wiped out that neighborhood the uttering tenderloin their expansion areas are those are from the eir those are documents you had before you their expansion are on this second thing

i've sent letters about one 50 hayes street the permitting they're using that planning on using that as hair headquarters violating the planning code because they're not supposed to get any permits unless you're with the institution plaster plan one 50 hayes have not been a planning institutional master plan planning department people the mayor are all invited to it at the places that are legal thank you. >> thank you is there any is there any additional public comment? >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm here my name is katherine an