interruptible reduction from 25% to 3% and closing increasing the excess use charge from increasing the excess use charge from 2x23 times. manager telling i had some conversation about this. there's concern from some of our interruptible customers that 30% village they're already doing a really good job and that concern him and him make that, so i would offer for the commissions consideration simply bumping up the excess use charge. so the penalty is really their sony doesn't perform. that's one way to publish equity. the others to increase percent reduction but again given demand item of cleaning to do that at this point. as we get into next year, that something whether we need to talk about it we would table in your that shows it getting up to 50% if everybody

-- that's where the rubber would hit the road because we be hurting at that point in time. so, i recommendation at this point would be to increase the excess use charge to three times, believe the reduction level at 25% for interruptible customers as well. >> what's in front of us actually is different than that is in it but >> yes. it's a 30% reduction for interruptible customers. i'm recommending at this point do we limit that to 25% because were actually getting the performance at a people. i'm not sure we need to bump that up but deftly bump up the penalties so [inaudible] have to pay more if they screw up >> i like to keep it at the higher level. i understand people and performing very well and with that hopefully will mean nobody runs into these limits. these are folks that have been getting a rate reduction and i think we really need to make sure the reduction

that we water is greater than for people not getting that great benefit. it's a small increments. just to maintain the integrity of the rates. >> so would you like to make a motion? >> yes. i'll move it as presented to us. mr. ritchie is suggesting a and lex >> i guess from our standpoint within partnering with the interruptible rate customers and they've been performing well during some of the challenges they have i think one of the things were looking at was achieving the 25, but hiring the penalty if they don't meet it. so, that was something that was a first step then, as we start really honing in on interruptible rates we didn't really think about it when we

initiated interruptible means relief to shut off someone's water will be the first one to shut it off. so, now as we progress a request for reductions, were trying to find tune it. were sort of suggesting that 25 is probably good enough that the higher the penalty. i do understand that you want more conservation from those accounts. so, it can go in either way. i think were recommending higher penalties, if they fail to meet the 25%. >> the objective that i have is not to make money to save water. if people have been getting a rate benefits on the

expectation that it august curtailed. we need to have a stronger cutback provision than is for people were not getting this. i would move it as presented to us and i would not support the amendment >> is there a second to motion? >> i will second >> public comment? all those in favor say, aye. opposed, nay. mr. courtney. >> i would >> motion carries. next time, please >> item 15 i'm sorry. i am 16 authorized 25 year lease to mission valley rock company were proximally 199 acres of

number six to number six in snow california for what is the management at reconveyance overburden and finds placement and recognition for rental rate of $60,000 per year +4% annual rate bands increases. >> stephen g assistant general manager for. if i can have the slide please. i just have one slide here. this is a map of the area in question. the area outlined in red is the collection of mission valley rock leases that were posing to consolidate into a single lease extension with mission valley rock company. it encompasses a parcel is referred to in many cases as s&p 24 surface mining permit 24. which is necessary for water management and fine management for mission valley box operation. the area to the northward of it is number 32

was the active mining area they use reyna. so this v-6 engine would match up with the other lease and allow them to continue their operation inefficiently but also has benefits for us in terms of water management, both for the alameda creek recapture project and the san antonio bypass i plan parts. we recommend approval of this item to extend the lease permission value valley rock for these parcels. >> thank you for that. when i was before us before, was not clear to me at the time this was not really prominent. that the extraction of this site has terminated and were renewing not for mining purposes but something else. that's a very different kind of lease. tenant unusual circumstance. i'm prepared to support it.

>> i have the same questions as i thought at first it was a renewal and as i said before, i'm not a big supporter or even a small supporter of mining operations. i feel like the pc is not really central to our core mission but i understand it's part of an existing lease. a different site that mission rock as where they are going to continue to c quarry am reluctantly all right with supporting this but with an eye towards eventually going out in a conversation about quarrying and mining and whether we should be using a glance that purpose. checked on the echo your comments as well. there's a discussion for the [inaudible] and mineral rights in general. i would welcome the discussion. check it so, perhaps, before we call for the vote to be calendar a

conversation. we haven't had one and sometime especially just have an overview of our coring operation with mission rock and maybe the terms of the of the lease. we've spent a lot of couple times a lot of time on it or lost is because of to speed with the projects are sure to guess. we can definitely do that >> i'll take that to move the item >> second >> any public comment on this item? all those in favor say, aye. opposed, nay. thank you. next item, please >> would you like for me to read the gauche items >> yes, please that would be great >> item 19, unmitigated cram bianco versus city of san francisco. item 20 unmitigated claim jane sandel francisco file and josé alvarez versus

puc. i'm 21 city and county of san francisco versus an old valley golf and recreation. gauche items 23 through 31 not be heard today. >> great. thank you. denied a motion, please on attorney client privilege on the matters as stated? all those in favor say, aye. opposed, nay. thank you. i also need a motion to recuse commissioner courtney from items 19 and 20 due to a conflict. is there a motion? >> i make a motion >> second >> all those in favor say >> thank you. back into open session. items number 19 and 20 were settled. please have a motion to disclose our

discussion during close session? >> i move not to disclose >> second >> all those in favor say, aye. opposed, nay. the motion passes. other new business? >> hearing none the meeting is adjourned. >>[gavel]@ppx

>> ever wonder about programs the city it working think to make san francisco the best place to work and will we bring shine to the programs and the people making them happen join us inside that edition of what's next sf sprech of market street between 6th is having a cinderella movement with the office of economic workforce development is it's fairy godmother

telegraph hill engaged in the program and providing the reason to pass through the corridor and better reason to stay office of economic workforce development work to support the economic vital of all of san francisco we have 3 distinctions workforce and neighborhood investment i work in the tenderloin that has been the focus resulting in tax chgsz and 9 arts group totally around 2 hundred thousand square feet of office space as fits great as it's moved forward it is some of the place businesses engaged for the people that have living there for a long time and people that are coming into to work in the the item you have before you

companies and the affordable housing in general people want a safe and clean community they see did changed coming is excited for every. >> oewd proits provides permits progress resulting in the growth of mid businesses hocking beggar has doubled in size. >> when we were just getting started we were a new business people never saturday a small business owner and been in the bike industry a long needed help in finding at space and sxug the that is a oewd and others agencies were a huge helped walked us through the process we couldn't have done it without you this is sloped to be your grand boulevard if so typically a way to get one way to the other it is supposed to be a

beautiful boulevard and fellowship it is started to look like that. >> we have one goal that was the night to the neighborhood while the bigger project of developments as underway and also to bring bring a sense of community back to the neighborhood. >> we wanted to use the says that a a gathering space for people to have experience whether watching movies or a yoga or coming to lecture. >> that sb caliber shift on the street is awarding walking down the street and seeing people sitting outside address this building has been vacate and seeing this change is inspiringing. >> we've created a space where people walk in and have fun and

it is great that as changed the neighborhood. >> oewd is oak on aortas a driver for san francisco. >> we've got to 23ri7b9 market and sun setting piano and it was on the street we've seen companies we say used to have to accompanying come out and recruit now they're coming to us. >> today, we learned about the office of economic workforce development and it's effort to foster community and make the buyer market street corridor something that be proud of thanks to much for watching and tune in next time for >> pilaties. it's a creation,

an old regimen of exercise. really based on core engagement and core structure and core development. we do a lot of exercise in developing that and think about lengthening of the spine and our muscles. if you're a runner, if you're into kayaking, martial arts, cycling pilates are for you. >> programs are variety year around at various locations and to learn more come to the

>> good morning. it's june 25, 2015. welcome to the rules committee of the san francisco board of supervisors. my name is john avalos the chair of the committee. joined to my left my supervisor malia cohen and we will be joined by the vice chair katy tang. our elect is alisa somera and clerk do we have any announcements? >> yes. make sure to silence cell phones and devices and speaker cards and parts of the file should be submitted to the clerk and items will be on the july 7