not try both entertainment and opening hours until toings on week days and 10:30 are 1 o'clock. >> i'm looking at that like castro and math has a bar and restaurant and catch has entertainment a piano i'm thinking this is going going to be like not bands or anything like that but i'm open to having an informational presentation six months or one year in you folks can come back and let's us know. >> the comment. >> to give us an opportunity to succeed that's what we're trying to do we're taco on a project and putting in a lot of money to

create new housing i'd like the opportunity to have you know jazz in theaverage. >> first after commissioner richards commissioner hillis. >> the other restaurant. >> excuse me sir. >> let's wrap up commissioner richards. >> a couple of more things the neighborhood is changing i get it the commercial strip is sleepy there are friends on 24th street the italian restaurant i want to get a meal and can't i want to go to a restaurant a catch restaurant like more restrictive and come back once they approve themselves and want a presentation don't want to be contentious i want to make a motion to approve the project

with the restricted hours to 10:00 p.m. on week days sunday, monday tuesday, wednesday or if you decide on thursday and friday and saturday until one. >> second and i'm sorry friday saturday and sunday until one. >> okay excuse me. excuse me. >> you're completely out of order the commission is trying to make an order. >> let's make a incision let's say week days wednesday, thursday, and sunday open until 10 and amplified music so far only on thursday and friday and saturday. >> no - commissioner hillis. >> so i - commissioner antonini and i'm okay. i'll be okay to

expanding the daytime hours of entertainment. >> i was going to say the same thing. >> start hour could be you know like 9 o'clock or 10 o'clock or 11 o'clock so they can have in the morning have a little bit of music and people can have lunch during saturdays and sundays but have to close early on sundays the hours will look like this four to 10 wednesday, thursday, and sunday or i was going to let them open earlier on sunday 11 to 10 on sunday and saturday 11 to one and friday also one. >> let me ask a question to

staff we need to limit name bodies at the time both sides the goal to simplify as simple as possible one proposal 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. week days i'm talking about operations and then 9:00 a.m. to one a.m. weekends and then for music i don't know for amplified music i think ohio as as it is now the operations hours is 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. the real issue it the entertainment if we can focus on the restricting the hours of that entertainment and what they propose as far 4 to 10 wednesday

4 to 12 on thursday, 4 to 2 on friday and 9 to two on saturday and sunday is special but perhaps if wednesday and thursday were 4 to 10 and friday saturday and sunday were 9 to one. >> oh i think they ask me they want the sunday times typically a week day. >> so. >> lower the sunday hour to 10:00 p.m. and so sunday wednesday, thursday the same and friday and saturday the straight i like that. >> commissioner. >> well, i want to ask a point of clarification were you proposing hours the operation. >> commissioner moore was commissioner richards motion i was prototyping the entertainment and the hours be the same. >> right. >> it's that simple. >> your regulating the hours of

operation and folks are okay with that so, i mean i'm just a little bit the week days 10 clock and week days 1 o'clock and friday and saturdays the operations in the entertainment will end at those times and the question was how early can you start the entertainment it's a huge issue so i'll leave it at that. >> maybe i know the day starts earlier than 9:00 a.m. >> wednesday morning. >> it makes it so much simplyer. >> commissioner johnson. >> i was going to suggest something similar to commissioner hillis i agree with so commissioner richards would public school be. >> what was the change.

>> the change would have been to limiting the hours of the operation and make the operation and the entertainment the same. >> that's great. >> limit them we're considering the weekends friday and saturday friday and saturday. >> closing at 1 o'clock a.m. and all others days to 10:00 p.m. >> yes. >> with live entertainment not starting before 10. >> no, no thank you. >> if i can ask the commissioner richards be a six months check in and. >> sore. >> absolutely. >> presentation not a memo. >> and commission. >> that gives you the change to talk. >> excuse me. excuse me. you're out of order the public comment

is closed until you're asked a question you're not priementd to be speaking and commissioner moore. >> i'm still a little bit confused about the opening hours and entertainment i did not go building that the current existing that rules to open at six-hundred a.m. that applies to a place that is more like a restaurant in addition to that it is what be the case i find the operation to building that entertainment will start at 6:00 a.m. that is counter to what we're trying to do here and 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. and depended on the when they open. >> i believe what's on the table a 6:00 a.m. operational opening if so desired and nothing before 9:00 a.m. for

entertainment. >> they're making the hours the operation and entertainment the same. >> 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. week days and 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekends. >> the presentation and the limiter so the installation of the limiter. >> commissioner antonini and. >> he is weekends are described as friday and saturday. >> it there a second. >> second. >> thank you commissioner antonini. >> there is a motion and a second to approve that matter with conditions as amended to include a noise limiter to entertainment commission standards a 6 month and one year report back presentation before the planning commission and the hours the partitioning partition

are the same 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. sunday through thursday and 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 0 friday and saturday commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu. >> so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 68 to zero zoning administrator, what say you? to grant the rear yard question and take the matter in add time and have the project sponsor working to refine the green roof. >> commissioners you're on items 17 ab alvarado a request for discretionary review authorization and the zoning administrator will consider a request for variance and good evening you have a kimberly you have a request for qualifying to legalize an existing iefrnt on a

former carriage house at the rear property on alvarado street it includes an existing deck located in the rear yard and the conversion of stolen space for bicycle parking spaces that is on the south side of al individual savrn jose to allow the residential density up to one denial per thousand square feet on the area the subject lot manufacturing measures 5 thousand square feet blues and has p 3 dwelling unit to legalize a you figured out dwelling unit the density is 6 dwelling units for cu approval a variance is to be considered by the zoning administrator to

allow the intensification of the carriage house and the reconstruction of a deck that are constructed in the rear yard yourself the public comment period i got one letter about the concerns of an expansion of the building envelope there is no change to the building envelope another phone call i received requesting copies the plans i mailed to them yesterday since they couldn't download it from the website the department recommends approval with conditions because the project maintains the historic integrity of the property and legalize a handout and has class one bike spaces within 9 modes of transportation

and includes the installation of 3 new street trees to the urban forest and would be associated variance the project will comply with other parts of the planning code thank you that concludes my presentation. i'm available to answer any questions. >> project sponsor. >> yes. thank you. >> thank you, commissioners my name is jason i'm the principle of jason arbitrarily and working to legalize an unpermitted twenl to the conditional use lot density i think we're all you know familiar with illegal units and there often in some residual area like the back of american people garage are attic and unsavory light and so forth this

project is different this is really an toxic space and the property as a whole was developed in 1892 as a working farm with the maintain residents in the front and the seary at the rear a carriage house that housed at the time by the records 8 horses with a hay lofts they've become car parking and the hay loft above is 11 hundred square feet with one bedroom and one bath with appropriate light in all the required rooms lot is as was said is 47 hundred square feet by a hundred and 14 and we did scares surveys of the areas that was 891 properties that is the

largest one of 3 equal largest lots in the 3 block area and we're 3 units when we look at the 91 lots 20 off those lots were 4 or more units meaning that smaller lots had more units than my clients lot of the 20 that had four or more 7 of those had 6 units so it is a fairly dense area and given we're only 3 units with cu we could be up to 6 that is allowed by 207 we think the foot is fairly light other thing the rear yard patterns in the 3 blocks and the 91 we surveyed 12 of those or you know 15 percent had a rear yard structures so you know we

have a rear yard structure so we drng don't think this is unusual or bizarre and given the fact we believe it is there since the 1970s the dwelling unit since there since 1892 and none complained we see the rear yard light issue is not a major, major factor so the desirability permitting this fourth unit relates to the current demand for housing in san francisco and the mission and the rise in rental rates as i said been there since 1970 without complaints and the process will be upgraded with now seismic efficiency and fire proving 0 it will be a better unit the same

tenants live there will continue to live there without upheaval to their lives are changes to their tenant agreement we feel this is good my client gets to have a legal unit and safer and healthier and we thank you for your time and if you have questions i object to answer those after potrero of kevin speaks. >> green bay packer good work i'm kevin my wife and i has lived in the unit as a renter and we purposed the building in january of 2009 we lived there with our children that go to the local school we will raise our kids we have 3 additional unit

one tenant since 2006 the unit i'm legal listing it has an elderly couch since 199 had the legalize has a family two children lived there singles 2009 and h have one previous tenants since the early 90s we feel the proposed fourth unit is a pleasant and desirable home and look forward to making f that better we greatly appreciate our support i know your time is preciousthank you for your consideration. >> commissioner moore. >> strongly 2, 3, 4 so for the i think it does decade is what we want people to do come forward and legalize a units and

to create a block banner including the 8 horses that used to be there i move to approve. >> second. >> on that motion commissioners to approve commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards and commissioner wu so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero zoning administrator, what say you? >> on the variance, close the public hearing and and grant the requested variance. >> commissioners that places you in our discretionary review on 19th street we've received a request from the project sponsor and the dr requester to continue to july 9th a commissioner richards. >> move to continue to

july 9th. >> second. >> on that motion commissioners to continue item 18 commissioner antonini. >> commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you in general public comment. >> any general public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. meeting adjourned