>> madam clerk do we have any announcements. >> please silence all cell phones and complete speaker cards and any documents to be submitted to to the

clerk. >> okay thank you madam clerk. okay we have a number of items to get through today around the departmental budgets but we have housing bond items that we'll continue until wednesday's meeting and a few other items throughout the agenda. we're going to, for the departments that are in agreement, we're going to call them up first and ask them to come up very quickly together and mr. rose and his team will be putting the recommendations forward and you can leave right away and for the ones that are departments that are still discussing with mr. rose we're going to recess until 1:00 p.m. and we're going to give you that time to continue to discuss and come back and see if there's

further agreement if not we can take action on various line items. >> item number 1 hearing on the budget updates from the mayor and budget legislative analyst and item number 2 appropriation ordinance and all estimated expenditures for for the department of the city and county of san francisco item number 3 annual salary ordinance in the annual budget appropriation ordinance for the fiscal years ending june june 30, 2015, and , and june 30, 2016,. >> we don't have anything for item number 1 today and i'll ask the following departments to come up and if you would come up together and one by one identify yourself on the

microphone and confirm that you are in agreement with the budget and legislative analyst's report and we can move to mr. rose to give his quick report. please come on up. assessor recorder controller's office city attorney health service system department of the environment treasurer tax collect or and police and district attorney, building inspection department and human services agencies and rec and park and we've already acted on on the arts commission and the mayor's office. >> mr. rose? >> we have one withdrawal of a ten $10,000 amount we're in agreement except for the ten thousand for the $10,000 and i can recite that for you. >> why don't we do that don't we do that at the end of these departments. just one by one come on up.

>> we are in agreement with the budget and legislative analysts and wanted to thank mr. rose's office. >> we're in agreement with mr. rose and thank him for his work. >> we're in agreement with mr. rose and thank you all for your work. >> department of of the environment and we too are in agreement and thank you all. >> office of citizen complaints we're in agreement thank you very much. >> thank you. >> morning for the police department we're in agreement with mr. rose. thank you. >> good morning. san francisco recreation and park department. we, too, are in agreement with mr. rose and thank him for his work. >> office of the district attorney. we are in

agreement with the budget analyst. thank you for your work. >> director of human services agency. we're in grand we're in agreement with the budget the budget analyst and thank him for his work. >> director of the office of early care and education and we're in agreement with mr. rose. thank you. >> good morning. public works. we're in agreement with mr. rose. thank you. >> morning supervisors. i'm with the juvenile probation department and we're in agreement with the budget and legislative analyst. >> department of public health. we are in agreement and thank you for the work. >> we're in we're in

agreement with harvey rose's office. >> thank you. >> good morning supervisors. i'm from the department of adult probation and we are in agreement with the board's analyst's recommendations. thank you. >> thank you very much sorry i didn't call you up earlier. anybody that i haven't called up? okay. mr. rose why don't we go to your reports, please on these departments. >> we we can be brief in summary form. >> absolutely. i'm on page 5 of our report. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget we recommend closing our prior year general fund encumbrances and

in in 2016-2017. >> okay. >> okay. the next department -- okay i see. the controller on page 13 recommended reductions in 15-16 total 438, 892 and we are also recommending a close out of prior year general fund encumbrances and our recommended reductions total 293 419. >> thanks. we're going to take them all together here here at the end. >> the next department is the city attorney on page page 26 . excuse me -- page 20.

our recommended reductions total 345, 002 and that's in that's in 15 and 16 and in 16 and 17 our recommended reductions total 14, 513. >> thank you very much. before we go to the next one our city attorney arrived. are you in agreement. >> yes, sir, we are in agreement. >> on page 26 of our report for the health service system our recommended reductions total 122, 490 in 15 and 16 and in 16-17 our total recommended reductions are ten $10,000. the next department is environment and on page 32 of our report our recommended reductions for

15-16 total 132, 072 and we're also recommending places on the budget and finance committee reserve totalling and recommending on the budget finance committee reserve. >> on on page 56 the treasurer and tax collect or our recommended reductions total 343, 878 in 15 and 16 and closing prior year encumbrances of 2, 553 and totalling 59, 633 in 16-17 and on page 79 for the department of public works our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total

767.72 and closing prior year encumbrances allowing an additional 202, 401 for the general fund and reductions for 15-16 total 511, 370 and the police department is next on page 113. our recommended reductions total 3 million $3 million and we're also recommending placing 2.4 million in the budget and finance committee reserve until the working group has completed its review and recommending reductions of a million 54, 414 and on page

127 for the district attorney our recommended reductions total 170, 261 in 15-16 and in 16-17 they total ten $10,000. >> we have our treasury tax collectors office here. >> yes supervisor we are in agreement and appreciate the cooperation and hard work of of the budget analyst's office thank you very much for your time. >> thank you so much. >> adult probation is in agreement as i understand it and that's on page 143 recommended reductions in 16-17 our recommended reductions total 568, 460.

>> probation on on page 140 our recommended reductions total 153, 453 and in 16-17 we have no recommended reductions to the proposed budget. the recreation and park department in a separate report supervisors, i'm on the second report now on page 5 our recommended reductions total 568, 595 in 15-16 16 and recommend placing in the open reserves and we are also recommending closing prior year encumbrances allowing the return to the general fund and for 15- fund.

>> on page 30 for the children and family's commission our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 269, 596 and for 16-17 we have no recommendations. and for the department of public health on page 44 our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 2, 009, 256 and close the prior year encumbrances and for 16-17 our recommended reductions and

on page 5 for the department of human services our recommended reductions and we're also closing our prior year encumbrances and our recommended reductions to the proposed budget and then on the arts commission mr. chairman members of the committee you have already accepted those recommendations but we are withdrawing on page 23 a ten $10,000 amount so what you had before for 16-17 of 54, 036 is now 44, 036 and the exact same amount for 16-17 -- 44, 036. >> the mayor's office on

page 148 going back to the first report on page 148 the mayor's office does agree with our recommended reductions which are total a hundred a hundred thousand dollars in 15-16 and in 16-17 -- excuse me -- in 16-17 and also 15-16 we have policy recommendations which the mayor's office has not agreed with. >> thank you. so action will not be on those policy considerations but just on your cuts? >> that's correct. oh, one other department mr. chairman and the committee is on page 17 our recommended reductions in 16-17 total 1,

181, 043 and recommending placing a million dollars in the reserve and we're also recommending placing a million dollars in the budget and finance committee reserve and i think that concludes our presentation right now. >> okay thank you mr. rose. do you have any questions or comments for mr. rose or any of these departments relying right now? okay. any comments on any of these proposed cuts. supervisor supervisor wiener? >> it's great to see so much agreement i'll be voting for all of these cuts but i want noted i'm voting against the cuts to the health services system. >> okay. so i want to thank you all for your hard work

during the course of the year and mr. rose and we're going to take action right now and colleagues i'd like to have a motion to accept the budget analyst's cuts for items 1 and 2. >> so moved. >> a motion by supervisor tang. >> for clarification, is it items 1 and 2 or 2 and 3. >> apologize 2 and 3. motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor mar and we can take those items without objection with supervisor wiener -- >> i'm voting yes except for the health services. and you can note my dissent on that one. >> okay. we take that vote okay so moved. thank you everyone. appreciate it. if we call item number 6 next we

have ocii still. if you want to come up. >> thank you mr. chairman and members of the committee we're in agreement with the budget and legislative analyst's report and thank you for your hard work. >> thank you. can we go to your report on ocii, please. >> mr. chairman the first report on page 157 our recommended reductions total 206, 905 and that's it. >> okay thank you mr. rose. colleagues if there's no questions we'll open this up to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item 6? >> so.

. >> sir, do you have comments on item number 6? thank you very much seeing none public comment is closed. colleagues if no questions or comments we'll entertain a motion to accept the recommendations on item 6 okay. motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. >> supervisor, would you like to send this item to the board of supervisors. >> yeah to the full board on board on july 14th. >> okay let's see madam clerk up next if you could call items -- we'll do items 7 and 8 please. >> item number 7 ordinance amending the planning of granting legal status of dwelling units and item number 8 ordinance amending

the administrative code self-appropriating fund to make corresponding changes to the housing provision related to the citywide affordable housing plan and plan. >> thank you madam clerk and i have the speakers here for item number 7 i believe are in the back of the room and item 8 miss hayward and this is item number 7 and i know you are not doing your budget presentation right now but this is the fee waiver so if you would just speak to it very quickly. >> it is a fee waiver for legalizing essentially accessory dwelling units and has a minor effect on our budget and action was taken on thursday actually to waive the rights to review a

little unusual. but this item last year i think there were 30 something applications totalling about fifty $50,000 so it's a fairly minor item. thank you. >> okay thank you, director. supervisor tang? >> just a question is this a time-limited fee waiver or ongoing? >> it is a a 5-year period. >> thank you. >> okay colleagues any questions or comments thank you very much we'll take miss hayward, item number 8. >> good morning. the item before you this morning is legislation that would correct two technical anomalies brought to our attention by the controller's office. as you know it's where fees are deposited including and fees generated

from the plan areas are deposited into the fund and this draft ordinance would correct two issues. the housing fund is not currently defined in the administrative code only in the planning code and typically specific program funds are defined and governed by the administrative code and that would be corrected by defining it in exactly the same way that other special funds are typically defined and secondly the so-called appropriating language is not consistent in the planning code and the jobs housing linkage fee as well as the incl u.s. ionary housing fee are called out as self appropriating but refer only to the affordable housing fund otherwise silent as to

their appropriation so the larger fund to which they refer to are silent and the draft ordinance would clarify that all of these fees are self appropriating and the two fees and one fund are self appropriating and seeks to correct all of this at the request of of the controller's office and to be clear it in no way alters the allowable expenditures so mainly all of these fee revenues are restricted to use by the mayor's office of housing and community development and the mayor's 's office of community development would continue to administer the fund this language will remain and be carried over to the to the new definition in the code and would not change any fee or their uses. i'm

available for any questions of course. >> thank you miss hayward. any questions or comments? we'll take public comment on items 7 and 8. anybody wish to comment on either of these items? >> [inaudible] [inaudible]. >> thank you anybody else wish to comment on either items 7 or 8? okay. seeing none public comment is closed . i'd like to entertain a motion to approve these items and send them over to the

board meeting for for july 14th. >> okay thank you. motion by supervisor mar and seconded by supervisor tang and we can take that without objection. madam clerk if you would call items ten and 11, please. >> item number ten resolution designating the exam er the exam er to be the official newspaper and item number 11 resolution designating bay area reporter and sf weekly and jasmine media and potrero . >> okay thank you. >> good morning supervisors i'm the assistant director of the office of contract administration this is requesting your approval for official newspaper

advertising and the estimated value is approximately 330 $330,000 and spending on this contract has declined significantly in recent years due to an increase in public notices posted on the city's departmental websites thank you and in 20 ten a board resolution changed the admin code for the reduced spending of official advertising with the current legislative requirement we expect it to to hold steady in the coming years. it would expire june 30, june 30, 2016, and per the requirement oca is required to conduct a competitive solicitation and evaluate the responses and

recommend the highest scoring responses for contract award. this year we received bids from the examiner and chronicle. san francisco chronicle is considered a non responsive bid because it does not meet the requirements of being printed within the city limits. the board has the discretion to award the contract as you see fit to serve the city's need for public noticing. it was previously awarded in in 6 months increments to both bidders and the examiner has received the award and the san francisco chronicle has received the award for 6 months and if you are interested, i have additional information and point scores per the requirements and i'm

joined here today by members of my staff and i'm here to answer any questions you may have. >> colleagues any questions? and you are also going to speak on item 11 is that right? >> correct. >> item number 11 is the contract for outreach for newspaper advertising and it's estimated that the annual value of the contract is approximately 15 thousand and the purpose of this contract is to reach a range of separate and diverse communities with information about the city's activities and operations this contract is for the fiscal year of 2015 and 16 again beginning july 1st , 2015, , and , and expiring in june 2016 and it's to evaluate responses and recommend the highest

scoring responses for the contract award this year we reached out to fifty local newspapers inviting them to bid and received only 12 bids from the newspapers. here are a list of bidders for this outreach advertising. you will see that they are a range of communities served by the current bidders african-american and spanish as well as lbgt and if you are interested i have more information regarding the bid evaluation for for your review and technically only 6 of the bidders are deemed responsive that the newspaper be printed locally and weekly and some newspapers are printed outside of the city limits and others are

printed monthly instead of weekly and what's included in the evaluation as in prior years the board has the discretion to award the contract as you see fit to serve the city's needs for public notices to diverse to diverse communities and historical this contract has been awarded to most or all bidders and add additional outreach newspapers if you feel that the needs of the community would be better served.