additional resources that be are coming in to the development and finalize the ticketing then we'll know what the gap is. >> is it going to be ground or alone. >> oh, alone uh-huh. >> thank you. >> i have a couple of questions on the affordable housing units i know we don't have a neighborhood preference program yet but is it appropriate to ask the executive director to give us some background on what might be you know an opportunity for the commission to consider a neighborhood preference for affordable housing? sure commissioners within the context of the existing preferences that exist within the mission bay plan and the agreement as many of you may know the preferences that exist

for affordable unit certificate of preference is at the top and to the extent that developments have not executed ground leases the ellis act because you're a legal separate entity from the city should you choose to adapted a neighborhood preference the board will report to planning the planning is doing an analysis and there will be a report in the fall you could do you want certainly preferences related to neighborhood preferences but there's a waterfall to create the harm new although this body oversees 21 thousand units a third are affordable with the master unit we need to harmonize the existing agreements our existing preferences which may be different from the city it is implementing we need the time to

analyze it and like to report book to you to the extent that analysis is done by the time the permanent loan and the ground lewis lease comes back to you it could be in the waterfall preference. >> with respect to the ellis act evictions remedy preference my understanding of the data when the budget analyst recorded to the board of supervisors in the south of market area there was significant displacement due to ellis act evictions in the mission is another area i guess i'd like to have you might not have it today but information on you know how many folks are taking advantage, if you will, of that program so yes, sir. r yes. there's a preference but the impacts would be

because we're talking about mission bay and then transbay i think that would be important. >> we can follow-up with data and jeff white occ project manager has additional fvndz. >> good afternoon jeff what did they housing manager i checked hundred and 36 ellis act housing certificates issued and hundred and 36, 9 from folks in describe codes some from bruno heights. >> do we have any tloins why interest are so few i'm pretty much there were thousands and

thousands of victims. >> those are the folks that went through the process getting the certificates so, yeah i don't have the why the answer to the why. >> yeah. >> the malice that will give us a report. >> that's correct. >> all right. maybe we can do a followup okay my last question i know it's early about the retail concepts but interested in finding what the retail concepts we might be looked at or the process will unfold whether groceries amendments to the groceries grocery stores anywhere here. >> i know the developer has been working with mission bay specification brokers and an entity that works with the nonprofit developers but foyer

specification i'd like to call a.d. deny doyle up here. >> i can show you the retail plans. >> oh, great. >> let's pull that back up so if you see the pink area on the bottom of the screen there. >> we're dividing into 9 possible spaces uh-huh. >> but the thinking is that the two on the ceda and on the nesdz will be combined to be 2 separate spaces those 4 spaces

who be combined into two and the four in the middle will separate individual so the two on the south side are being schneider as restaurant that is the one we'll open as the restaurant and the outdoor seating overlooks the mission bay courtyard and the two on the ned are start for van ness so we're, however, designing that space so could accommodate a restaurant in future years so if they vacate in 25 years it could be converted back to a restaurant space the four interior spaces will be designed to accommodate lighter restaurant use so not the large restaurant use about accommodate a waxer shop something like that it will accommodate that range of what you're seeing mission bay now

from our conversation with the brokers they think the restaurant spaces may go into the, a r buildings and morality by the time it opens up we're designing it to go either way. >> no grocery stores. >> no, it's not designed as a grocery at this point. >> through the chair if i may commissioner bustos as many of you may know the beacon place the ancestor grocery store for the neighborhood and a series of other market hall concepts under is a market hall being proposed further up fourth street across the street from fourth street a block up the street a food hall like a style and i'll ask my colleague to talk about the

mission bay specific and the proposed warriors market hall concept a few blocks south, temporary uses from food truck parks that are going in and this is our senior development specialist and the interim project manager. >> good afternoon, commissioners i'm so project manager on mission bay so there's a math hall concept the director mentioned that is in the process of getting tenant improvement permits and there's the promoted worrying retail the fourth street corridor spaces are largely designed as smaller this total retail is 10 thousand square feet for your grocery tenants are looking larger spaces generally speaking and coordinated with the various

brokers and agencies for the market rate projects to court reporter what that retail is we're - a grocery is not going to want an over saturation of use we're working with an emerging retail market that is really trying to get a sense of the build out as the market improves we've been able to attract a boarder range of retail but at this point with the market hall concept that serves the folks on this south side of the channel and bread and butterer, if you will, grocery stores the safeway in that serving that market shed for this up to this point in time okay.

>> all right. then. >> okay. thank you. >> those - my questions anyone have a question on the design? comments? okay. good? okay >> do we have a mansion. >> it would be nice to have a motion. >> i'll move it is coming back to us i think we can sort out the other things. >> it's been moved by commissioner bustos and seconded by commissioner singh please call the rely commissioners,. please respond when your name is called: commissioner mondejar commissioner singh commissioner bustos madam chair rosales madam chair, i have 4 i's. >> okay item is approved thank you. >> please call the next item. >> 5 d.

>> the next item is 30 years a loan agreement with the housing partners a california limited partnership nuchld of $16 million for the development activities related to the construction of 79 affordable units plus one managers unit at transbay block 8 as long as 250 fremont street and adopting the finding prudent to the california air quality accusation and action resolution 472015 madam director. >> thank you, madam secretary commissioners as you recall in april you approved the do so position agreement for block 8 with related n t n d c and

approved the schematic we're at final financing and the occ sources so with that, i'd like to introduce you to benjamin brandon the development specialist in the housing with an ininaugural presentation for the commission. >> good afternoon madam chair rosales and director bohe and commissioners i'm ben i'm here to discuss the loan for the transbay affordable projects with 80 units of affordable units to low income families project is parts of a larger block 8 master development in a transbay project area transbay redevelopment was adapted in 2005 with the purpose

of repeating 10 acres with block 8 that were owned by the state of california to generate funding for the tjpa to constrict the new transbay center and meet the affordable housing requirements assembly bill 812 is an combooshl obligation it requires the occ as the development agency to insure that 85 percent the new housing units are occupied by very low, low and moderate income households the project implementation agreements is another enforceable obligation to accept the to third party's for development including affordable housing

in november of 2013 pursuant to the agency they issued a request are for the development for a high density mixed use on block 8 in june of 2014 after a competitive process we entered into the negotiation with related california as the market rate development and the tenderloin development corporation and the nonprofits developer along with the office of metropolitan and architecture as the leads designer with the small business entrepreneurs as the architect to the low rise building on april twitter of this year it was approved requiring the purchase prize of $71 million for the block 8 and establishing the ocii maximum

for $250,000 per unit the block 8 master project from schematic design was approved relayed will pay the purchase price coming in october a r as a reminder here is the site map affordable project is comprised of the buildings bound in red and what you're looking at is essentially two structures that comprise that project so today we are asking for your approval of the $16 million permanent loan the source of the requested funds will be the transbay development team on july 16, 2015, the citywide loan committee recommended approval