>> good afternoon please take your seats the meeting will come to order this is the regular meeting the land use commission i'm sploelg the chair to my right it supervisor wiener the vice chair and to my left is supervisor jane kim our clerk is ms. andrea ashbury the folks helping us to broadcast this it jessie larson and leo

completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the september 22nd board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated i appreciate the announcements please call items one and two together. >> the amending of the dagget street for the open space and open space zoning and an agreement. dagget street vacating a portion of the street accepting an gift and encroachment permit >> madam clerk turn our involuntary manslaughter up a little bit we'll turn up our voluntary manslaughter to make sure our translators can hear and translate colleagues want to recognize those two items will help to deliver a new one acre open space to the potrero hill community also known as dagget xuntd that accept growth and

increased density were promised and an array of amenities that include new parks after a number of years the land acquisition and securing the necessary resources for this park the action before us will help us to deliver on one of those promises the structure of this transaction insures the community will get new clean open space and more importantly the city has a mechanism to pay for this in person up to the time the package sets out the necessary approvals needed toe create a new park that includes rezeroing the space, vaiblth the street, open accepting the gift of the maintenance of the park and approving of the encroachments i want to call up the staff city

staff who have been working on this project hear in robin's from the office of economic workforce development ms. evans. >> good afternoon robin with the office of economic workforce development we're pleased to finally be here before you to present this milestone structure project in a showcase square the potrero hill plan a long time we're excited to implement this community vision sorry first of all, the location as you can see did dagget street shared public way and open space is located in the showcasing 9 foot of castro on 16th street it

meets 17 street under one acre used to be the home of the paint factory that is a paper street not used as a street and used to be underwater as part of mission bay pending our approval the dagget street will be transformed into two areas an open space on the top photo and a shared space the amenities of the open space will include large lawns and features in the sitting areas and universal accessibility, a dog run and mission mash bears and milling multiple features for instrument run off and landscaping a one way shared public way in the bottom left hand portion portion the slide

will allow vehicle assess the shared public assess will help with shared access and it is detected by the bollard an vanity cafe will activate it area and the open space two new buildings flank this public land owned by equity be residential and scheduled to finish construction in 2015 to the buildings compose 4 hundred and 53 rental units this image shows the timeline of the dagget project as you can see the project started in 2009 with the community process and 2011 the city partnered with adjacent landowner this promise to maintain the owner will run with the land i'll explain they'll receive a fee waiver for part of

the cost improvements and gift the rest to the city the city faced several hurdles in making this a reality the most significant figure out how to convert the property that used to be under waistwater cerebroopen space we have a series of actions to allow this project to move forward we would like to begin by reminding you thought community background the eastern neighborhoods involved an extensive process to compose the residential areas as part the plan the eastern neighborhoods infrastructure impact fees they may provide improvements number two, of the pavement in 2009 the eastern neighborhood infrastructure pressuretions of memorandum of understanding between 7 city agencies lifted

the prelims of one now open space in the showcasing area for the funding in the eastern neighborhoods this location at dagget was one of the 7 priorities and chosen as the top funding proprietor in 2011, the planning commission approved a fee waiver to cover part of the cost of the open space at this location this slide describes the additional community process and design review that's been going on since 2009 it used to look at in the top photo on the right in 2015 the eastern neighborhoods advisory committee supported the use of the infrastructure impact fees owed to the project to build a new open space the agreeing even though street process benches realizing the open space i described one the main challenges with that

project sets a local serving space on dagget would not have been trust remembered this used to be underwater because of the mexican-american this is a state requirement which and include the open space for example, a marina was allowed use here but not what the community had in mind the city using utilityed the states commission late in 2014 as part of the process the city transferred the land with $500 million plus the 54 was awarded a portion the housing parks grant $1.06 million will fund the transfer and local fund facilitated by supervisor cohen's will fund the gap the land of dagget will transfer

to the release for the open space and public works with a shared public way several actions allow this including the street will vacation and the jurisdictional transfer sorry. >> the additional challenges the project to insure that open space is kept hundred hundred percent pub assessable it will continue to be public land and proposed to be rezoned in open space in the height and bulk designation be proposed to be in the plaza program with the supervisors approval in early 2015 to this last point i a short reminder the plazas program was established in 2014 of the admin code a local shipyard framework

from the plaza and this board of supervisors adaptation and approval the program is a new tool to coordinate the city efforts to streamline the process to encourage activation and a long time home for the plaza projects created through those programs sanlsz this requires a rezone to support the open space i'd like to go back to the issue of how the city will memorize the maintenance as a reminder the planning commission approved a fee waiver an in kind agreement for the open space this is at the top of the slides the top is the vehicle to support the land for the private land if this is sold to address this the city created a vehicle a maintenance declaration will be recorded to the land to the

north the buildings directly to the north of that open space. >> for the shared public way sorry for the left under the real estate box the loved one gray box the property owner will have a license to main the space this mechanism is a major encroachment will be backed by the declaration both the license and permit are part of the approval package today in addition i'd like to walk you through the numbers of the project the total costs the improvements everything you see to the reporter that is green is roughly 4 passenger door .9 mental illness the planning commission asked the developer to pay the costs under one million dollars it lectures the cost of the open space improvement anothers $3.9 million of that the planning commission

appropriated an in kind fee waiver for $2.3 million that leaves the remainder of 1 about the $6 million that the developer proposed to give out to the city 55 this legislation page that excludes the makes sense i described on the previous slide i. to some of the actions during my presentation here's the full preservation that will help the open space became a realty please let me calling your attention the ordinance on the left allows for the rezone of the open space in the main ordinance on the right the memorandum of understanding and jurisdictional transfer allows the public trust lifted from dagget street and the required funding process to move forward in addition to the other axes and the ceqa general plan items you'll also be allowing the

director ever public works to accept others riders improvements and finally we must take a moment to acknowledge the partners that made had possible as you can see we have city staff from the several departments and represents representatives to answer any questions you might have thank you. >> thank you, ms. heevenz why not go to public comment at this point is there anyone from the public who wishes to comment come up to the podium. >> good afternoon. >> i'm not done this is a point of reminder there is a 2 minute limit for public comment you'll hear a soft chimney. >> supervisor kim a duty for a city to every single residents of san francisco for the pro

effective completeness and the enjoyment of life housing neighborhood. >> this item is not housing thank you. >> any public comment on this item? items 1 or 2. >> seeing none, public comment is closed thank you very much colleagues do you have my questions or comments or anything you'd like to share all right. not seeing any, a couple of comments in closing those are the types of projects we some be prioritizing and delivering to the eastern neighborhood i'd like to make a motion to send one and two i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation i'd like to acknowledge the planning department staff as well as the leaders that cooperated and

brought this item to fruition colleagues a motion to send items one and two to the full board with a positive recommendation seeing no objection this motion passes unanimously thank you, madam clerk. >> could we call item 3 please. item 3 the ordinance amending the administrative code and the rent and or a tradition ordinance. >> thank you i'd like to turn this over to commenting to make openly remarks. >> thank you chair cowen and summarized this legislation over a month ago before the recess i thought i'll summarize the legislation for a second reading and many of us know the importance of passing stronger tenant protections as we continue to see a destabilize listing impact of the house,

ways, and means committee that is housing crisis here in san francisco according the annual report there were 2 thousand plus notice of sequoias ending february 28, 2015, this is a 54 percent increase from over 5 years ago and despite the decline in ellis act eviction thank you to the advocates and, of course, the board of supervisors and the mayor's office for their support on this we have seen a number of no fault evictions increases by 84 percent over the same number of times it is likely more higher as many go unrecorded as evidence bits the citywide balance report that was passed in july san francisco is quote essentially running in place on affordable housing and what has become the most expensive housing in the u.s we've addressed 5 hundred plus in 2004

and 2014 rental units were moved from protected status to a variety of no fault allowed by state law the data shows our anti eviction work is every bit as important to support the construction of new affordable housing according to the annual report the 5 reasons of evicts are one breach of lease two nuisance and owner move and eviction and ellis act and 5 illegal use whether the increased focus on the advocacy of our attendants groups and leader and community resident on ellis act eviction the other leading cause of breach and nuisance are increasing while the owner evicts have been on the incline we've been

over-burdened with the evicts of immigrants our legislation does a number of things we put but stories and thank you to the tenant what they've perp been going through with the evicts and, of course, the fear and anxiety that comes along with it but many of us are experiencing which is a loss of diversity in our neighborhood of people that work in different folds and occupations and encompass what a healthy city like san francisco that legislation did this 5 i believe so i things one evicts nos are in multiply languages in chinese and chg and russian and stopping the evictions because

of learned must provide prove the allegations and a reasonable time for repainting this bedroom wall or remove the laundry out of the windows or taking the bicycle out of the common hallway and housing not authorize for residential occupancy such dwelling units that are such as commercial unit spaces that were converted to legal units shouldn't be the whole reason for eviction we saw that last year with the tenants on market street who are also here today and finally this codifies the availability control allowable under state law into the rent ordinance this codifies the state law requires a attendants to temporarily relocate or the remediation work

for the tenants are next tenant can move in at the rent of the departing tenant taken together this provides protection for the tenants and reduces the ability of owners to raise rent in certain case those power amendment will impact our vulnerable tenants and reduce the incentives to bring forgot cases to rerent for hire rents i know there is a discussion on some amendments today from my colleagues supervisor cohen and supervisor wiener on clarifying some of the launders around the amendments we'll put forward i have no further comments and open for discussion and. >> thank you, supervisor kim and also want to acknowledge

many of the community members are here today thank you for bringing this item before us for us to consider i wanted to thank the individuals that reached out to my office last month to their their stories last hearing hearing he raised the let me residency occupies from the tenants are living in illegal units i've seen short-term rentals that are dashboard into 8 different units with the floor in unsafe condition and after the last hearing thank you for the opportunity i spoke to the city attorney's office will clarifying language so colleagues before we go into public comment i'd like to propose an amendment the clerk calculated to you i think you've

had the opportunity to amend the language it adds a language to clarify nothing ♪ legislation prohibited a landlords ability to recovery positions under the 37 a-8 and 10 those are sections which provide for the elimination of uninhabitable illegal units and insures that tenants get a a relocation assistance this is necessary in order for us to prevent future confusion with seriously unsafe illegal units are discovered thank you very much i will leave that open and we'll go to how supervisor wiener next >> thank you very much madam chair and thank you to supervisor kim for bringing this forward when supervisor kim first announced that she was

drafting this legislation i remember thinking that this is something that was long overdue for discussion because there are i think a relative small group of owners that have been barrier in an abusive way i think i mentioned the one egresses situation in any district and other district by a woman named monique that was engaging in 23r5u7b89d behavior to try to intimidate tenants we've heard the example of the very minor leased violations leaving a blanket in the hallway or leaving launder where it is not supposed to hang and so on and so forth and none wants a tenants to be evicted for any

reason violations the got you violations anything we can do to prevent that from happening is a good thing in this housing crisis we don't want those kinds of evictions and at the same time, we want to make sure that for more serious violations that landlord can manage their buildings i expressed the way that the language was drafted around nuisance violations and similar violations damaging the unit, interfere with the comfort and safety and enjoyment of the landlord or other tenants i thought that language was drafted in. >> way to make that almost possible for a leonardo da vinci to take action when a tenant is committing a serious serious and

perhaps nuisance that those types of violations from the landlord is not knowledge in the building many other tenants are impacted i indicated alternative language i have been in the interim middle east e meeting with board of directors i'm meeting with the tenant advocates and met with the department association and the office spaces and have alternative language i want to read i think gets to the heart of what we're trying to get at so what it will do is right now on page 10 line 5 where the proposed amendment states when a landlord connecticut commence to get possession we'll strike that auto r out and keep the counter

language and add the following quote the activities are serious continuing or reoccurring in nature what that does inactivated making that impossible to ever vooefshlg evict on nuisance no matter how severe the nuisance has to be severe or continuing in nature or reoccurring in nature not just the one time thing not a anywhere violation but something that is much more significant and so this is an amendment i'll offer avenue public comment and thank the tenant groups and landlord groups to make sure that language gets at what we wanted it to get at two other amendments i'll be offering up to public comment excuse me. one has nothing to do

with for this legislation effectively removes on owners ability to limit the number of sub tenants in that unit and essentially gives as i read it the tenants ability to bring as many sub tenants in as are permitted by the housing code the landlord have no ability to restrict that and override future lisa i think this gospel too far we have an exception already in the code that's been there for quite some time to bring in family members above with the lease requires i think that opposing that up for no ability to honor a lease of sub renting is too far i've heard talk about in addition to family members some

people require a caretaker and needs a car taxi i take it sensitive it that so the amendment that i am offering will remove the language on page 8 line 14 to package 9 and on page 7 the photograph on line 20 after the exemption for allowing people to bring in family members will add an additional exception to read as follows: to a caregiver the folks meet the definition of the under state law that's a second amendment and finally, the availability control i agree that we need to address the

situations where particularly effectively fraudulent owner move in evictions but it provides when a have a capital improvement eviction that of the unit is rebutted how 20 or 25 years later no matter how much time passed the existing rent applies if someone moves into the unit after 20 years and rents the unit out they have to apply the rent from 20 years ago under the ellis act you can rent it auto at market after 5 years this actually makes the ellis act a short the period not a bad incentive for the ellis act you have to ellis the entire

building the amendment i'll proposing on page line package 5 line 10 it is the paragraph will state where a landlord has terminated the tenancy and substitution 1, 2, 3 or the next 5 years from termination the base represent will have to stay the same if i rent it out within 5 years then the base rent stays the same this aligns it to not more does go beyond the ellis act that creates an incentive to do ellis act evictions he have the language and those are the 3 amendments i'll bring up after public comment so thank you. >> all right. thank you very

much supervisor kim why not go to public comment. >> i have a stack of cards here. >> thank you chair cowen he realizes not everybody or ever be has put in a card i'll call the first 10 names i'm sorry there's a huge stack of cards i'll call the first stack please line up on that side of the wall (calling names) roy, karen, david, kenneth richards and mindy. >> i realize are 2 minutes is

not a long time for public comment on an important issue if you feel your comments were reflected say ditto and add into a different prospective. >> all right. we'll try to be brief i personally have been for quite a few times years from 1950 been a malcolm heinicke member and residents in san francisco therefore i've only known of the old style of honesty and respect first question i face of the supervisors how many have ownership ever rental property how their stepping iuoe on my toes i'm fed up with having to

look at it as something that i have eminent domain and no available use of it jet i have 6 children that are all asking me what can be done thank you for that kind of assistance i'd appreciate it. >> good afternoon, supervisors my name is peter wright with property owners i'll not speak to the eliminates of the 6 points of legislation and i'm thankful for the amendment that have been offered it seems is sterilization i want to leave you with people being e elected from their apartments this is because owners don't want to rent out with the legislation that exists i think it san

francisco has enough tenants protection we should enter a moratorium perhaps not declared but defactor and started working with property owners to see how to get back some of the unit taken off the market by choice the no on f people are or the yes on f people are saying that 10 thousand units are being used exclusively for short-term rentals i can't prove that a lot of people are doing short-term rentals is it so not legal but doing that avoiding to rent to long term tenants you should work with the private sector and we can sort this out and get many, many units back on the market thank you. >> good afternoon my name is bob

san francisco that is all performance carry a burden the rent received is lessons or less than the operating cost of the building forcing landlords into a negative cash flow position is no longer enough now supervisor kim and her fellow comrades are going to attack small property owners if this passes the city forces small property owners to carry the burden forever with no hope of raising rent to cover the operating costs the building the leonardo da vinci victims of the supervisor kim legislation will continue to peppering subsidies their tenants comfortable lifetime in san francisco by paying the lawyers

lions share and causing many of the buildings to fall into disrain water or c walk away from the building and default causing a mortgage country or sell they're building hoping someone will want to buy a this and who wants to buy a prompt why is this the city i did yes. the city is buying such building for pennies on the dollars to make up for the small guy that invested in small real estate and small pertains maybe easy to target to attack but they're not the enemy not having the courage to invest in san francisco the kim legislation is a bad, bad idea it flies from the face of economics and it is urban

american - >> thank you sir, i'm sorry our time is up thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> any i'm lee district 8 quite often the small property owners pay the bmr rents versus the operating costs but there are amendments preservation large developers avoid the bmr by pagan a one time fee to the city great for the developer but bad for the city by removing the requirements the developers will be their, their fair share of the bmr burden on the each time to spread the bmr units to all residents of san francisco by legislative you didn't go a state of the art within the city limits that subdivides those

tenants that pay below market rate thus between the building rates and that small pertains are footing the bill the city recently gave 8 hundred thousands to the tenderloin clinic to fight a state law that allows the landlord to recovery a unit the city could have been used to to provide affordable housing instead of letting the t hr from extorting money there are many ways to help to provide affordable housing rather than keeping a burden on the backs of small property owners the city and it's representatives need to side their job for providing affordable housing without skwaikdz small building owners to make a fair living and one question school on our proposal for the last part of the

legislation is that all tenants for the 5 years or after the eviction. >> hello at this time this is public comment we'll have an opportunity to discuss with the committee afterward. >> next speaker. >> and good afternoon. supervisors i'm president of the small property owners of san francisco our members are small mom and pop eye my own story is similar my husband and i bought our building in a run down building and most of the surrounding shows you were boarded up over the years through hard work were able to buy a 2 four unit building in are still run down neighborhood and fixed those up and rented them we continued this this is subject to ever more restrictive laws of what we

could or couldn't do they were for these us to let relatives move p in with no additional rent i do said my building is almost empty so i sold it and the tenants of 19 years moved from the flat blow we knew we'd have to go downstairs we'll not been able to climb the stairs but our daughter and son-in-law moved in on the street next to us 10 units sat vacate and a rental unit in a two-bedroom suite become owners unit this is on one street within a block of

me at least 19 units empty the type of vacancies controls is a foot in the door for the kind of rental laws that cause large amounts of landlord to walk away let's not fool around with this and go to sensible legislation (clapping.) >> thank you for the applause you've remind me i forgot to remind you a rule in the chamber for no applause so you hear something wave our fingers if you here something you don't like thumbs down. >> first of all, thank you to supervisor wiener they're in the process of amending the amendments to the amendment sir we want to hear our remarks

speak into the mike. >> i believe that the measure that the prototype measure may increase the premiums associated with the this return of capital assets in reality i didn't so the measure may cause higher costs associated with properties and grow increases in kwordz or future rent collected if any with the expectation of inhabitable units that ms. cowen mentioned i believe mixed with rex and preventatives have contributed to the housing supply and that legislative measures my prevented to put on housing and roofing over our heads but the contractors measures that actually do

the primary beneficiary of a shortage of housing supply has been the city treasurer so the few units available the higher tax revenues is the actuation. >> thank you. next speaker. >> high i'm sue i can't believe i'm the first tenant to speak i'm thirty days into a 60 day eviction notation notice in a home i'm a senior living on a fixed income as long as the small property owners are here let me tell you i moved in on 1979 the day after rent control he was a teacher at the sacred heart bought the building for

$30,000 in 1979 get a low interest to bring it up it up to code in the 3 seven years with rent control i am paying for that building at least a dos dozen time over in the meantime the other two units are turned over if their original rents of $289 he's paying 14 hundred upstairs and the think illegal unit ones they're paying $600 any one the units could pay for that that building dozens of times over my landlord died a rich man not have of that building you have to be a rotten businessman to lose money with

rent control in san francisco. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisors. >> thank you scott wiener for your amendments i'm not going to talk about the amendments what their do to the existing leases your house rules and basil_hawkins and the 2 hundred packages i'll not only review to the rent control laws and i'm going to tell you about my story i've been a film maker for 40 years no preparation bought 3 unit with our saves to have income whether we retire we've lived with 3 groups of tenants which one unit was vacated we left it empty and increasingly

less able to navigate the constantly consulting rules of owner rental property we thought less and less control over our property and now those new amendments do you think they'll give us the reason to put our empty flat back on the market? i don't think so >> next speaker. >> thanks karen you said a lot of things i'm david thank you, supervisors for doing this today, i was going to say some of the same things the national on hate ashbury is vacate and unlivable we'll rent it we'll loss all the control it is not to be a landlord yet 0 that's how we lived i'd like to ask sometime before i die i'd love to see some amendment in the

legislation that helps you will say rent our property i doubt that will ever happen those amendments pile on year after year and make that unpleasant to be the landlord we truly want to be thank you. >> >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> landlord. >> sorry i haven't called your card yet andrew and i think the line is longer than the card i've called if i haven't called our card please have a seat i'll call the next 10 cards assuming we've cycle through the first 10 edwardo, and others

(calling names). >> if i have not called our name if you can wait until i call or submit a card so i can call your name. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon board of supervisors i want to tell you about the total and unfair control against landlord in san francisco there is many, many more the tenants don't pay their rent up to a year they can still get a lawyer from the city on charge to get

the proceedings the landlord, however, need to pay their own lawyer fee subsidies no help from the government because they will landlords - as a building they are not some property owners feel they need to jump off the impracticable to be taken serious in san francisco the laws are over protective of tenants for example, supervisor jane kim is hundred percent of the tenants right now she's making a law to protect the tenants if you heard both sides the good tenants as well as the property owners new tenants won't be able to find any housing or rooms to tell the down in san francisco because property owners will be forced to if their rent-controlled unit

from the market in order to protect themselves and their property from bad renters i'll one the pertains h that will take my rental unit so kim's legislation i urge you to vote against supervisor kim thank you. >> (clapping.) >> remember no applause house rules. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm kim wong i am a property owner in san francisco last year my tenants didn't pay my rents for 9 years a i spent 75 thousands to evict them they got free lawyer from the city before my tenants be moved out they destroyed my property and turned on the water more than

one thousand goggles gallons a day i don't put my property on the rental market supervisor kim wanted pertaining to - so i let the tenants stay in any property one year for free can supervisor kim tell me to pay for my mortgage and partitioning in san francisco there are many, many more bad tenants than landlords the laws are more than enough to protect did tenants now kim is making a law to protect the bad tenants supervisor jane kim is one hundred percent on attendants side please do not pass it thank you. >> (clapping). >> all right. this is going to

be a long hearing. >> please. i'm only number ten. >> please no applause. >> next speaker. >> i'm midnight i didn't a realtor our and property manager and own a small property owner i present very much skoolts attempts to clarify some of this this is a lot of verbiage in those amendments and in the ordinance itself which are unclear to the oriented e older owner what is a a reoccurring nuisance a substantial breach those require people to go towards professional management or more lawyers so it makes it very, very difficult to manage one property it is the small owners that have relationships with the tenants that do things that don't raise rents and do

things like give consumptions there are probable some bad apples in the lymph gland as you said scott doing thing against the what are you and laws on the books to stop those practices by making things more and more complicated and defended you'll find that it didn't increase the relationship between the landlords and tenants but diminishes that and many of my clients are seriously considering taking their units off the market it is two difficult to navigate if you can't afford the lawyers to help you thank you. >> thank you. >> i'm sorry latonya a could be active i hear poor poor me what about the tenants that are on the street and getting kicked out i've seen so many people

poor me and poor me landlords saying poor me look at the people around you poor me. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> . >> (speaking foreign language.) >> sir. >> (laughter). >> so good afternoon. i'm edward is with the sro collective i've been trying to talk to the renters in the building we're not allowed.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> so it is not building manager don't let us go in but the books prevent united states from doing the surveys with this >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so we're not able to do the service so the tenants don't know their rights and the right to request from the sro management for example, those sro tenants are paying $52 per day they don't have a contract good afternoon. thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker,

please. >> >> sorry a quick announcement there is an overflow room in room 263 behave roufrn 23 people so as i call your name, please come to the room. >> good afternoon. i'm with the mission acholic beverage when it comes to the numbers of evictions and landlords that are good and bad we're seeing an increase of bad landlords that take advantage of the system to evict the tenants for frivolous reasons i'm a resident in district 10 we see a lot of folks not in the dbi code for habit ability with affordable housing is on track e stock in san francisco with the relocation fee help the tenants find another place everybody that becomes a landlord you're

running a business and running a business comes with responsibility you need to be able to be accountability and responsibly for the prospers your returning this law will support that and mayor that landlords are hold accountability not evicts and we do need to possess o post the evictions and notices to terminate terminate in different languages smoking gun sometimes the tenant can understand the notices what is wrong with that putting the note in different languages what's wrong with making sure that the landlord has to explain and go throughout the process to evict small business what is wrong with that if you want to run a business be held accountable for tenants and held accountable to the city any other business will be the same

thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please research and your representative in the ca hone board i'm here, here to support supervisor kim's legislation as a co-chair the homeless board i want to remind you in 2015 the latest survey says 50 percent of the homeless are tenants or owners in san francisco i've been thinking and linking to people to take care of the city and county citizens this is the time to take care of the tenant and prevent homeless it is well in the city i want to let you be that san francisco homeless have been living in san francisco for more than 10 why recent it is important as a service provider i tell you as american people

african-american woman and disabled white women come into the doors because a landlord put them on the streets and they're landing on streets or in the shelter thank you very much protect our citizens. >> next speaker >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm agreeing dresser goldman with the tenderloin corporation i'm here in support are support of the eviction protection as you may know tndc runs buildings and lucky for our tenants protected from the wind of the aspect active market all citizens need to be protected that's why i'm here they deserve that same security so plenty as been said about the affordable housing but the affordable housing is the easiest thing to

do to make a dent in the affordability crisis it is much easier than the hundreds of thousands of dollars to make one unit ever housing much easier than the political capital i believe those are closer to preserving our housing stock and that lower-income people can stay in the city >> hi, i'm naomi a right-hand turn others market street supporting supervisor kim's legislation i want to say that strongest rights in the city i have worked as a after school teacher in the public schools and in san francisco that is very hard to