approved. next special order. city clerk: a special order approving a tentative map for a lot and condominium for the project and make environmental findings of ceqa. item 46 is the motion to approve the decision and approve the tentative map item 47 is a motion to disapprove the public works disapproving the tentative map and item 48, preparation of findings related to the tentative map. >>supervisor london breed: members of the public, we have more business to conduct. can you please exit quietly. >> colleagues this is an appeal for the project. for this hearing we will consider whether the tentative map aforesaid project is consistent with the general plan for any specific plan

that applies. without objection we will proceed as follows: up to ten 10 minutes for the appellants to describe their appeal, up to 10 minutes for support of the appeal, and ten 10 minutes for the department of public works for the planning commission department of the approved maps and the parties to represent and 2 minutes for public commenters to speak in support and finally the appellant will have up to three 3 minutes for a rebuttal. without objection this hearing is opened and that's how we will proceed. first up is the appellant. you have ten minutes. 10 minutes. >> good evening, supervisors, i'm diane carpal oi z map coalition.

sorry for the late submissions of all the issues. it's quite complegz and i did my best to reconcile prior to this hearing. first i would like to start off with the agenda. it's got three motions there. that should be corrected. it only addresses four of the blocks and lots associated with the three tentative maps that have been conditionally approved by the planning department. so, if you wouldn't mind looking at the three motions that can be made at the end of the presentation that would be great. i would like to request additional time. there were three projects, almost 60 blocks and lots at issue. and, lots of paperwork and

applications. i'm guessing that's not going to be allowed. the information provided, inadequacy for approvals and community benefits. questions about project ownership and tax liability as an item. so, on august 24, 2015.

residents at merced received a notice identifying. can i have an overhead please. almost 60 blocks and lots, hundreds of addresses and three projects tied to the conditional approval. there are several inconsistencies with this notice. it says it is an approval of the subdivision maps, it says down here it's a tentative approval and it's an approval on the tentative maps. now, technicalities are boring and tedious and i understand that, but it's garbage in garbage out an these items need to be addressed before we can even understand what we are appealing. so, we have communication from project sponsors from their tentative

maps and communication from department of public works and tentative from frank lee that they said they have not received the final map yet when we picked it up from city hall on september 21, one of the pdf files, three of them were actually application for final checklist maps. we are getting a lot of conflicting information and confusion from the city and from the bare minimum notice basically when resident side received this notice they didn't know they were going to be impacted. it's an enigma in itself. it's 52 acres. started out as 200, they

are using the name park merced and technically the state owns some and they didn't know the feedback we are getting. 800 summit. it looks like the notice didn't go to them. i'm not sure the due process was in noticing happened accurately. the other, there are questions with due process. we are not going to focus on that. we basically want to focus on the points that this notice in and of itself is erroneous and not clear and doesn't serve as a notice to people living in and around the area. this did not accompany any map. this project is associated with a map. this area is highlighted and there is a

duplicate block listed. so if this block is supposed to be something else, which i believe it should be probably i'm assuming here, i haven't heard anything different or but 7235 is not their property, but 7325 so it may. that warrant clarification. a ton of information to review. we have been given ten calendar days to appeal where the city allows up to 10 business days to provide information on information request and going off simply this notice is unreasonable and inadequate especially for three projects. so, when we did request the tentative maps they were sent on monday

the links to the maps and those we had to register to the website to get it. these actually don't even give a clear understanding of what we are looking at. but we have development block one with 4 blocks listed, block tentative map with 1 block listed and 21-22 with 7 blocks listed. so this is essentially three development blocks in one. and 21 s has not been identified. even so we requested them and we got

those. so with asked for, we did appeal based on there is zero information provided that people didn't know. they were panicking. and we had a lot of questions. we received the dpw work order these are labeled, the final map which lays a confusing element, a further confusing element to this process. in the order regulations signed in march 24th, this year to replace old regulations, we haven't reconciled what's been changed and what not. there is no tentative final map. there is a tentative map and

processes related to that. there is a processing map and a final map, final checklist map and final processes and milestones that must be met in relationship to that. there is no at the present time tive final map. this is a great concern. i only have a minute 1/2 left and the thing i really want to emphasize is that there were, the letters submitted into this board of supervisors that no final checklist map has been submitted, it actually has been submitted. it was received by news our record request on september 21st. there are several questions related to that as well. so shall -- here we go. it's

really not enough time to go through everyone i submitted 11 page brief trying get everything that i have caught thus far, but it's really no public hearing was provided prior to conditioning the conditional approval. so the public had no input related to any of this. so you have to not approve this. you must deny this conditional approval. thank you. >> thank you, supervisor yee, you have questions? >>supervisor norman yee: yes, this was approved before i got into office. i respect the residents of the

apartment long fight in this development. i appreciate the thoughtful and well research brief they submit to support their appeal. i also completely understand the feeling of worry and uncertainty that residents feel before a construction phase. i have a few questions for the department of public works. >> would you like to wait until they finish their presentation? >> i think this is related to the statements? >> okay. >> can you describe the noticing procedures for the subdivision required by law? >> good afternoon, supervisors, bruce dorse city and county surveyor. i'm going to let him respond to your

questions. >> good afternoon, supervisors. paul naebing public works. in response to your question we have promulgated a subdivision code and regulations that specify that consistent with state law. we noticed all resident side within 300 feet of a subject property. we required the property to show a map what are that boundary line would be n this case, we decided that since the project does have such a large impact for the development agreement even though there was not sort of the state requirements to notice as many people as we did, we did notice all the residents for the development area out of an abundance for caution. >> in your notice, why was there discrepancy between the

assessors parcel number in the ones noticed in the subdivision sn i'mly -- similarly out of an abundance of caution, it only covers 4 blocks however the cities conditions of approval, there are many other streets as part of our requirement to approve in this city map. those are listed in conditions of approval, all of those blocks that we have listed are affected by this approval. that's why they were included. >> in regards to supporting documents, how were they made available to the public when they are not included in the mail and public notices? >> on our notice we state that the public can contact us. they are available for pick up at 1155 market street third floor at our office or we do attempt to make them

available via e-mail where the lot size is larger we do a mail receipt for provided on an ftp site on the internet. >> thank you. there was an you should of the property owners site that sort of changed hand. when was the last change and what are the requirements around notices are for such a change oh for this basically a different owner? >> yeah, that is a contention raised by the appellate. we will verify ownership prior to approval any final map, but at the time of tentative application, we ask the applicant to sign a statement basically under perjury they do have an interest in the property their asking to subdivide and that suffice

our condition to get the title and guarantee. >> also the appellant sort of noticed that there were some back taxes owed in one of subdivisions 186001. >> i can't speak to back taxes, we require proof of payment and that would be something we would address in the future. >> is that part of park merced at all? >> i haven't verified this myself, but i heard that is owned by the san francisco state university and not part of this development. >> thank you. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, with that, we will open this item up to

public comment for those who support the appellant. mr. yip? public speaker: the item for the side. i don't know what we are talking about. i support that anyhow. but if i have a chance for public comment -- >> no, mr. yip. okay, next speaker, please. >> i live near this apartment. this year i have had a chance to we knew it was supposed to be a freeway. it's evident, it's more cars and they come close during high morning and evening hours. it's impossible.

current planning and construction with more high rises. with people with the cars. these people in the high rises don't give access to the bart station, not to the cal trains. they will use cars and it will again be more cars. there is very high pricing in san francisco. you can see the prices. the prices will never go down. there is enough globalization in san francisco.

the streets in san francisco -- by car. that will happen if you continue to approve high rises in san francisco. thank you for your attention. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. next speaker, please. >> yes, my name is jarrod faulkner. i'm not for this appeal, but i can tell you about merced. the management is horrible. they have shown so much bad faith and so many hands it's a joke. i was part of the residents associations of the merced coalition. as a result of the activities at the park merced management. they got to an individual, daniel flichs phillips who was dead

now. he sent is us as the membership committee and through us out and if anyone of us tried to go there we would be arrested fortress pass many we took the letters we got from him and had the rest of the board sign for impeachment under roberts rules of order. we have a terrible rodent problem. it's to bring the garbage to central locations. the rodent problem has exploded. we had a big problem in our place and the next door neighbors did too. it was one problem after another. they did everything they could. frankly an investigation by

this board would be very good as to the tactic that we used. it's very reminiscent of the work we have done and the struggles by the race itself. in this case it's an economic situation rather than a racial situation. thank you. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, next speaker, please. public speaker: hi. i am a long term park resident. i received that little map in my mail. it showed the surveyors names. all the residents didn't know what streets that they went to. i feel i'm very worried about what's happening and it seems that things are given to us quickly, ambiguous and unclear. a lot of residents are worried.

i wonder why there is such lack of clarity in the notices special lau if they are going to charge in our community. there is 3- 4 construction sites happen. it's a very large piece of land. it's just very confusing to the residents. i would like to request more information for the residents. we did get for example in april a newsletter and they said that's when they were going to do the phases and later they said they were going to go, muni was going through -- but then it didn't happen so we weren't noticed that this wasn't happening. so when we get these newsletters, it doesn't seem like solid information. it changes. anyway, i would just like to have a little more clarity in the

notices since it affects us all deeply. i'm just questioning why is there such am ambiguous information. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> hello supervisors. my name is glen rodgers. i want to mention that behaviors similar to this by the city was recognized by the north beach neighbors. they were shocked to learn of a contract to tear up columbus street for the roadway and this was signed years earlier with no public disclosure. this led to the plan when it was brought to the board of supervisors. behavior like this, including secrecy, violation of due process in consistency between notice and maps

inadequacy of documentation of approval. questions about ownership and lastly tax liability lapses should not be rewarded. thank you. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, are there any other members of the public who would like to speak to the appeal? seeing none, public comment for that component of this hearing is now closed. and we will have up to ten minutes for 10 ten 10 minutes for the representative of department of public works and planning commission to describe the issuance of the map. >> madam president, supervisors. i will be brief. to follow up on the questions that you raised i would like

to clarify for the board that the map has controls that we follow at the department of public works. the appellant raised quite a few legitimate issues, however, the department's response to those comes in the conditions of approval that we have issued and for instance, the issue about ownership, that is something that we will verify. it is a conditional of approval for this map. questions about taxes, same thing. so in some cases, these are real, they are good questions, but they will be addressed in the future. another, the question about the at the present time tive -- tentative map and final map process and the term final map mean as opposed to tentative map. those are terms that we require the appellant to use to be very clear that this is a tentative final map

as opposed to a tentative parcel map which is easier and generally easier to get approved. this is the highest level of scrutiny for our department. the confusion over noticing, that is a bit confusing and again that was done out of an abundance of caution to make sure that any resident who might have an interest in this map could contact us to request additional information or to appeal that to this board. so, because of the development agreement that this first phase of maps is processed under covered the entire merced park area we include any of these areas that might touch the blocks in this noticing requirement and to all the residents in the park. to my knowledge this is the largest notice circulation of notice

that the department has ever done. other than that this map was processed per our usually and conforms with our state law and local municipal codes. >>supervisor london breed: supervisor wiener, you had a question? >> >>supervisor scott weiner: yes, for the department of public works. as i understand this is a first of series of division maps that will be issued with respect to the project? >> that's correct, supervisor. this is the first of many possible subdivision maps per the development agreement. however the developer has no obligation to apply for future subdivision maps. >> in one or more of those, the dimension of streets is covered by a subdivision, map, eventually; is that right ?

>> in our conditions of approval we have specified the developer will need additional street improvement plans which have not been approved complying with the development agreement and that covers streets. >> that will be pulled into a subdivision map? >> the subdivision map only covers the right-of-way. it doesn't get into specificity about the street. >> it will cover the subdivision map? >> that's correct. >> does this subdivision map cover street width? >> yes. >> today? >> yes, sir. >> what are the widths. that was not my understanding. what is the width covered by the streets? >> i don't have the map in front of me. i think it's over 100 feet wide and other streets are more like 60

feet wide. >> i'm talking about more of the neighborhood streets within the development. as you know and i have had disagreements with your department about for example on the hunters point shipyard and candlestick project where the department of public works had streets that were dangerous because they were so wide and we had traffic. i want to make sure we are not having the same situation on merced. my understanding that that issue was not before us in the current subdivision maps? >> i believe your concerns are delayed in that we issued a conditional condition of approval that would require in particular mta and planning department and dpa. we are going to need basically

a unanimous consent on the issues. >> i'm still a little confused then. in terms of the streets running through the projects, how many are included in the subdivision map before us today? >> the streets adjacent to the subdivisions are shown. for instance between blocks 20 and 21, there is boulevard, that's shown in its entirety. there is a number of other streets in improvement, community benefits that will be required to be shown on future or current. >> i'm talking about street widths? >> the street widths where they are shown they have a dimension. >> so as of this subdivision map if it's approved today will log in the street widths for the project? >> they would need to be in

substantial conformity with this map. >> that's not what the department informed us. we asked for the appeal because we have a potential dispute with the fire department and department of public works about the widths of the streets because we had been informed that there was another push yet again to have extra wide streets that are not conducive to safe residential use. so i'm sort of concerned that after we were informed of that by the department that you are now saying the streets are part of this. i don't know. >> i think maybe the misunderstanding is the overall street right-of-way. that's pretty much final. however the allocation of that use of that various street width, the travel way or pedestrian friendly zones, is the question that is being worked out right now on the business improvement

plan. >> so in terms of how wide the curb to curb that's not before us today? >> no, sir. >> so in terms of whether it's going to be 26-foot clear or 20-foot clear on the parking subjects that's not before us today? >> that is not part of the subdivision maps. >> will it be part of the future maps? >> that will part of the process that is being circulated to the planning department and to all the other concerned agencies and getting consensus that this is the correct use of the public space. >> that final decision would that be folded into a final map nor project? >> it would be folding into a future board action to accept the built out public streets. >> for the board of supervisors? >> yes.

>> because in the project it was folded into the subdivision map. >> i don't want to be labor the point but it was on the overall street right-of-way and that was not an issue here to my understanding. >> in terms of the over all allocation to street versus sidewalk, in terms of whether we are going to have sort of wide raceway streets or residential streets that will be based on board of supervisors approval? >> yes. that will come to be on the department and public improvement agreement. >> and we have the option to reject it at that time? >> presumably so. >> we have the power to do that and that's not before us today? >> no, sir. >> thank you very much.

>>supervisor london breed: okay. at this time seeing no other names on the roster. we will have up to ten 10 minutes for the real party interest to present. >> good evening, president breed and supervisors. i'm jay abrams from the law office. i would respectfully request that you -- reject the provisions here because what is connected to the appeal because of the department 's desire to over notice to more residents which was not required by law. we thought it it was appropriate thing to do as background this board

approved the project in 20 11. there was a development agreement at that time. the merits of the project were gated debated. -- after they filed litigation challenging the city's certification of the eir. that was litigated in superior court where they lost in appellate court where they lost and california supreme court where they lost again. so the merits of this project have been discussed and debated quite significantly. what we are here tonight is the subphases 1a and 1b. related to those subphase approvals. the maps are conditional approvals. there are about three hidden

-- 300 conditions before approval. that will come for you for approval. there will be supervisor wiener asked, there will be future maps coming before you for future subcases of the project. we submitted a letter responding to the appellants claims and i just want to reiterate the notice requirements per state and local law that the noises -- notices are sent to property owners. what dpw did was sent the notices to all residents within 300 feet. >>supervisor london breed: i'm going to pause your time. supervisor wiener has a question. >>supervisor scott weiner: you just

referenced my colloquy, do you agree with their assess ment. my understanding that it's appealable before the board of supervisors in terms of the curb and how much is allocated as opposed to the people. >> i believe that he is correct. however, by the time it reaches you all, there is going to be several rounds. street improvement permits that will have been reviewed by the various agencies. currently we are preparing 95% version of the plans. we are responding to those comments now ernest. in some instances the comments are not consistent with each other. we are doing our best the help of dpw which has been fantastic in trying to resolve the conflict among those comments and right now we are working on the plan to be submitted to the city within a few weeks that will then be

provided to the committee again. by that time it will be three or four times. i believe it's confirmed, but i believe the public improvement agreement can be approved or disapproved. it can be by dpw. >> that is not before us today? >> no. >> and when it does come before us we can accept it or reject it? >> that's correct. also to clarify his comments which was correctly stated which is what's being shown in these maps is the area of the total streets, the area dedicated to sidewalks, bike lanes, automobile listens. that's what determines. these maps don't determine any of that. >> okay, we are going to start your time again. >> okay, thanks.

the second point to make that all the related to the project related to the two first subphases of the project which is something to do which is the map of the totality of the project. finally i want to address the chain of title issues prior to the agreement of title 11 project sponsor were required to review and since then there is a legal requirement that tefrt city transfers the city is notified. that's happened and that's been fully addressed with the city. finally i just want to note that this is a large project. there is a project sponsor that has a great responsibility to inform the residents with what's happening with the project. given the size of the project

this is a challenge concerning whether or not to provide too much information, a little bit of information here and there. what we have been doing is submitting resident newsletters on a quality bases that are very detailed and shows the scale and the project and the various approvals that are happening. there is also a map that shows the areas of subareas 1a and 1b. there has been quite an amount of information explaining the project and what's happening with it. i just want to make it clear that we've been taking that very seriously. so we are here for questions. thank you very much. breed >>supervisor london breed:

okay, with that, supervisor yee, do you have any questions in >>supervisor norman yee: yes. this subdivision starts really impact is those that will be moving first or possibly moving first and the question i have is what are you doing specifically to those residents that might be relocated in this first phase of your development? >> good afternoon, supervisor yee and supervisors and president breed, staff mall on with project sponsor. what we have in addition to resident newsletters, we had the ability for the residents to be relocated. that meeting on september 9th where we invited all of them to walk with us through the project and procedures and to the relocation plan and how it would

impact them. our relocation map will enable us to construct new homes. our main offer is to construct the new homes. >> and if it goes when would the resident have to give you notice that they want to move into new places? >> the notice provision are redetails in the development agreement with the relocation plan. our noticing to the residents the meeting we held to talk to the place many noticed before to be placed residents are in 2b. that meeting had to take place before any building permits were submitted. the next notice is within 60

days of start of construction of the building that we'll house to be relocated residents. we have to let them know when construction will start on their home and we anticipate construction to take an x period of time and we'll give them notice at that time. within the expected 6 months prior to completion of that building, residents will be noticed again and there are a series of notices that will happen. it's no greater than 1 year and no less than 6 months prior to the completion of that building. it allows them to tour the building and rank their choice of home by unit type. each resident is able to select a unit type and we'll show the homes

that match the money -- minimum or greater corresponding size. there is a first notice, a second notice and ultimately a decision is required before they move to relocate. they do have the option to elect to move. they also have the option to stay in their home and take relocation assistance as designated by the rent board. >> so when is the last moment when they can decide whether they want to move or not? >> the last time, after, technically if they want their preferred unit. it's within that second notices provision up to that point. however if they change their mind at the last minute and i want to

move and i don't want to move off sight, i want to stay, then they will be given one that is still available and they will buyback with seniority. in talking to residents, it seems what's unfair or unknown, they don't know what to expect when construction starts happening. can you describe what's going to happen? >> we all know construction can be disrupted. we never tell anyone to the contrary. our goal is to work with contractors that we have worked with impact on noise, dust control, air monitoring systems. there will be noise. i will not tell anyone there is not going to be noise. construction is a noisy and dusty process. we'll do our best to mitigate and control that and

address concerns as much as possible. >> what will be the process or procedure if residents have some specific issues of our own construction. who will they go to and who can they actually launch the complaint. >> there is various ways. we have a direct website. info parks and vision.com and we have a phone number for that access. residents contact us through that all the time and we respond to that directly. parks and recreation and services department also have the ability to contact people. they have the same access through portals and web mail and addresses also. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, supervisor yee. at this time we will open it up for public comment for those who want to speak in support of

the rio part and interest. if you have a public comment please come forward. you have two minutes each. >> hello. i have been in support of this project since it started. i have lived here for 12 years. they have been very good about notices and i have come here to talk in favor of it. i'm not confused. recently i got a really well informed. i was well inform frd from

what i received from them. it will be affected by all the noise and trucks and everything. so when i got this letter to say that there is another appeal, i was >> looking forward to an apartment. and i heard about all of these issues and this is where i would be living if this can go forward. please.

i'm appealing to you to let this go forward. >> san francisco department of public works and i have been listening to the appellant and department residents and you understand where there are real issues they will be dealt with down the road, with the classification of ownership. where there are issues otherwise they seem to result instead instead either from legal language to obscure as much as it clarifies and from a tendency to over notice rather than to over notice so there was not a failure to notice. it was adequate in itself. we ask you to approve it. there are a few of us in the audience i would ask you to understand of the building trade. we continue our support for the project. >> thank you, next speaker, please.

>> good evening, supervisors brook turner, executive director for better housing coalition. thank you, we appreciate your interest and your discussion of it. we want to applaud our colleagues in the rental housing industry of park merced to establish new homes of san franciscans and badly needed new homes and we'll continue to work with them to make sure that the needs of the community and the city and tennants are addressed as we know they will be. we respectfully request that you affirm the approval, the tentative subdivision map. thank you. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. now the appellant will have up to three 3 minutes for a rebuttal.

>> thank you. we heard a lot about having the notices accurate but actually we don't know what this is for, if it's for condos, the fact that they were building condos for sale was not in the newsletter. any kind of subdivision, if it's residential they have to notice. the fact that they are saying they went above and beyond is not true. they barely met state requirements for governmental codes. the entire. the final checklist and map has been submitted. so, i'm not sure here is a letter saying please accept this final map and checklist. this is in january 29th. dpw did not hold a public

hearing for people to address concerns there. i agree with that lady. i don't want to deal with another appeal. i don't know the to deal with city hall. i would like an informational meeting so we can tackle issues prior to them being approved and ultimately appealed and not everybody is going to be happy, but let's try get this, include people so that there is a clear understanding about how we are going to move forward. another issue is that there is 400 vacant units at park merced right now and there is an affordable housing crisis. so, they are not being forthright about that or they are actually contributing about having the rental rate way too high for what the apartments are. finally i included in the attachment a reconciliation of who was noticed and what the deed

says and what the blocks and properties are at issue on this hearing. i want you to focus on the subdivision map approval of three maps which notice went out erroneously. there are issues. it seems back wards to be able to provide proof of ownership after the city does this work. it does not make sense to me as well as making sure the taxes are paid. on that issue. i did go back and review after jim ab rams letter was received that they did owe $76,000 on it. it is the city's responsibility. this item highlighted in red are notices that didn't go out. they were not included in the

notices. the yellow are the development blocks. >> thank you, ma'am. thank you very much. >>supervisor london breed: this hearing has been held and is now closed. this item is in the hands of the board of supervisors for items no. 46, 47, 48. supervisor yee in >>supervisor norman yee: thank you, president breed. colleagues as i said at the beginning of the project. the project is not what is in front of the board today. what is in front of us is a subdivision map appeal. and my conclusion is i do not feel that the appellant have shown enough evidence to over turn the department of public works decision. colleagues i motion to move forward no. 46 and table items no. 47, 48. >> supervisor yee has made a

motion to support item 46, table 47 and 48. >>supervisor scott weiner: i will be supporting it. with the information from the colleague in terms of department of public works, with the issue of street clearance is a very important one. it does ultimately feed into the final map. i don't know, it seems a little bit unclear right now whether it's going to come to the board onnor -- or not in terms of our discretion to approve. we've heard some concerning things about the decisions that the department has taken in terms of wanting wider streedz -- streets and streets that are less safe but that does not appear to be before us today. my understanding that the current property line

width in this map are the same within the development agreement and today we are not making any decisions with this appeal about street versus sidewalks in terms of whether sidewalks are starting to shape back to have wider streets. so that is an issue i'm going to be very carefully monitoring because this is a major development with the city, a new neighborhood effectively, a significantly revised and expanded neighborhood and it's important we get it right in terms of design. but as far as this appeal, i will be supporting to reject it. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, supervisor cohen? cohen cone thank >>supervisor malia cohen: thank you very much. i will be supporting this

project. in district 4 and 5. it's nice to share that responsibility with the west side. >>supervisor london breed: >>clerk, please call the roll. city clerk: supervisor kim, aye, supervisor mar, aye, supervisor tang, aye, supervisor wiener, aye, supervisor yee, aye, supervisor avalos, aye, supervisor breed, aye, supervisor campos, aye, supervisor christensen, aye, supervisor cohen, aye, supervisor farrell. aye. there are 11 ayes. >>supervisor london breed: the tentative map is finally affirmed unanimously. madam clerk, can we go to the next item on our agenda. city clerk: we were in the middle of new business. we will begin with supervisor mar.

>>supervisor eric mar: thank you, as people exit the chambers, let me say that san francisco has the best music festival. it's the bluegrass festival. i wanted to say thanks so much to warren hell man and the hell man family in district one. it immaterial -- impacts my district. we expect hundreds of thousands of people to come in and enjoy the park. hopefully it's a beautiful we can't saturday and sunday october 3rd and 4. it's in hell man hollow and meadows as well. it's really thanks to 14 years of a vision of warren hell man to

bring such incredible musicians to our city. it's internationally renown bluegrass, rock n roll, alternative, post punk bands and this year's lineup as a small taste of what's coming up, bob skaggs, welch, steve earl, paul from the jam, joe jackson, little feet, michael fram ton, loss lobos and tremendous lineup this year. for more information go to www. hardly strictly bluegrass.com. also when john paul jones from led zeppelin

appeared and bob of the grateful dead appearances, we are always looking for incredible surprise performances and i'm always looking for turner klondike and if residents have immediate concerns about blocked drive ways, increased traffic and lack of public traption, they can call the harvick bluegrass community hotline. 415, 702-6727. or my office. the hotline becomes operational friday october 2nd. i hope to see everyone out there friday through sunday at the harley strictly bluegrass festival. thank you. >> thank you, supervisor mar, supervisor wiener. >>supervisor scott weiner:

thank you, colleagues today i'm introducing legislation to reform and restructure the committee that deals with street closures in san francisco. this committee which is currently basically interest departmental committee without community representation plays an important role in terms of short-term closures or block parties or street festivals as well as more permit closures such as the pavement to parks program. it's important that this body be expanded to go beyond city departments and also to include representative of the public who are knowledgeable in areas of whether it's pedestrian access, entertainment and so forth. so the legislation will formalize which right now operates in a very informal

manner without clear rules without consistently applied rules and will formalize which department will have votes and department representative and right now departments will send people who are not even familiar with what is before the body. and will provide four appointments for the board of supervisors for the community representation. the legislation will also require that hearings be properly noticed and sometimes they don't even vote. they will just kill a project without casting any votes. they will be required to issue and annual report including information about the number of applications and number of applications approved or denied. and will also require to

develop a survey requesting applicants requesting anonymous feedback. a number of space projects in terms of the parks will continue to be permitted byes scott and the project must be preapproved by the department and mca in letterhead by the chief from the department and department of transportation and is scott will hear prior to issuance of any permits. we need to have a body over seeing those events that are actually up to the task and the rest i submit. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, supervisor wiener, supervisor yee. >>supervisor norman yee: i

submit. >> supervisor avalos? >>supervisor john avalos: tomorrow i will be going to washington d.c. to meet with hud and the federal financing agency and we are also taking part in an event with mooup municipal leaders and senate leaders across the country as part of a homeowners day of action in washington d.c.. tomorrow's goal for me will be to talk to hud and fannie may and freddie mac leaders asking them that here in san francisco we passed a resolution, here at the board of supervisors and several mayor's at the conference of mayor's here in the city passed a resolution as well urging hud and fannie may and freddie mac to sell loans not wall

street where they sell to wall street investors who just take those mortgages and they make money off them but don't put any conditions on how those mortgages will be kept in the hand of working people especially latinos and african americans across the country that have been hit by the down turn in our economy and that's across the country. so i'm actually reexcited about the opportunity. i think here in san francisco as we have heard today from reverend brown as to the economic conditions that we find ourselves in. i have worked diligently to tree to see what we can do to help. i have put in the trust fund

that is supposed to create programs from the mayor's of housing to be able to support homeowners and there is such indifference in that department that we have not been able to see anything come forward that has enabled people to keep their homes and wealth and their families and it's keeping latinos and african americans from living in this city in san francisco. even with our economy booming we don't have that experience of being able to maintain or maximizing our wealth. hopefully hoping to get a good response from fannie may or freddie mac. if we are not able to sell to wall street and financial institution we have organizations that will work towards achieving principal reduction for

homeowners, helping homeowners to have a property they are able to pay for with a better mortgage with a lower interest rate and the goal is to make sure working people can hold their wealth in their homes and households to be able to support a middle class that can actually grow across the country and here in san francisco. the rest i will submit. >> thank you, supervisor avalos. supervisor breed? >>supervisor london breed: thank you, colleagues. i have one in memorial for tracy dyson, born on september 21, 1968, and passed away september 20, 2015. she was a graduate from balboa high school and attended contra costa college where she study social work. she dedicated her time to work with social services. she suffered

from lupus and multi-sclerosis. she was extremely talented in home decorating and it was her hobby. she constantly watched hgtv and her family she would have been seriously involved in design were it not for her illness. she is survived by her two sons, anthony 24 and aaron 17. she was an amazing mother and friend to all who knew her and she will be missed by her family and loved ones. the rest i submit. >> thank you. supervisor campos. >>supervisor david campos: i have a few items. the first item is a follow up of a packet of reforms that i introduced last week which i am calling the safety not scapegoating package which

addresses the very tragedy incident that happened at pier 14. as we know there are people like donald trump and others trying to score political points affecting an entire community as a result of this tragedy. today i'm introducing a third part of this package, an ordinance that requires off duty peace office to ensure weapons in a lock box or to lock them in their trunk of the vehicle. i want to thank supervisor mar for cosponsoring this ordinance. the fact is that having guns end up in the wrong hands has been an issue for years. currently there are between

270-330 million firearms in the united states. enough for every man, woman and child in this country. between 2005-2010. 1.4 million guns were reported stolen in this country. right now there is no public tracking in annual gun thefts including guns that belong to law enforcement. an audit that was done by the u.s. county general's office found that fbi and 14 reporting agencies reported more than 1,000 guns lost or stolen between september 1998-july 2002. something the gao says need reform. recently in the bay area, guns from

officers, the last people you would think a gun is pulled from. we had a bureau agent here in san francisco in late june. that individual left his gun in his backpack inside the car. it was visible in plain sight. an unknown person stole that weapon, and low and behold 4 days later the shooting occurred at pier 14 and resulting in the tragedy death. last month a gun was also stolen in the backseat of the chief of police vehicle. and only 5 days later a hayward police officer had his gun stolen from his car that was parked near starbucks. we must make sure that weapons issued by the city do not fall in the wrong hands. we need to ensure that we do everything

we can to protect our citizens. the ordinance that i'm introducing today will ensure that we will do better to secure guns when stored in vehicles. i actually hope that this is the beginning of a change in policy and attitude around this issue and that other bay area counties including federal and state agencies will follow suit. the second item that i have is simply an introduction of interim prohibition extension on commercial mergers and the 24th street special use district. this is simply an extension of what we have done before. i want to thank my colleagues who supported the original interim controls. and today, the mayor and i are asking for a 10-month extension to the original 45 days controls so we can complete the community process and finish drafting permanent controls for that area. >> the last item that i have is

a hearing request about resulting from a very sad incident that happened in my neighborhood, one of my neighborhoods that i represent in vernal heights where i live. we had a transformer owned and operated by pg & e that exploded. it injured two residents in my neighborhood. today i'm calling for a hearing from pg & e to talk about what happened here and what we can do to prevent an incident like this from happening again. i want to know how many transformers there are not not only in vernal heights but quite frankly throughout the city. how is the infrastructure that pg & e run maintain. what is it that happened and the idea that in this day and age, in 2015, in this country, in this city, you

can have that kind of explosion is pretty scary. i know that many people in my neighborhood in vernal heights but quite frankly through other parts of the city are scared and the one thing i cannot guarantee to people right now that i know we are doing everything we can to prevent this from happening again. the purpose of this hearing is to ensure that. i also want to thank the california public utilities commission which quite frankly has led the utilities including pg & e do whatever they want. i'm grateful to the c puc that they are doing a full investigation over what happened. we have to ensure the safety of our residents. the rest i submit. >> thank you, supervisor campos. supervisor cohen? >>supervisor malia cohen: submit. >> thank you. supervisor farrell. >>supervisor mark farrell: one comment today. our city provides jobs

and revenue for our city and a huge contributing factor to our neighborhood. we ask a lot of our small businesses in the community for respect and paying fair wages. these businesses and their employers comply with local state and federal laws and are forced to adopt their businesses at all levels of government to continue these policies. i think we all agree when we put these policies in place we want to make sure they are followed and implemented correctly an it's time to see what effects they will have. given the time to do this right, my staff has been working and i want to thank them for their support. i'm introducing a piece of legislation to add more regulations process for

employees and employers. the legislation will provide that it's empower and implement to enforce will become operated unless a new ordinance passes a different date. this 180-day rule would not apply to ordinance existing that is currently in power to remain in force. also requires that days in the enactment that issues a renotice on their website for add straighting rules and guidance. on any amendment that takes place that oolc, the same 30-day advance notice on the website would apply. these 60-30 days enforcement period will not relate to cases currently pending an will not hurt any employees at all. and will be provided by all of our policies. lastly osc required to give

notice relating to their rules and guidance and requires that it encompass on the new rules and guidance. i want to thank you for the report and taking the time to get it right. this law will law to put the law of osc and employers to adopt new laws without hurting their businesses. i look forward to the discussion ahead and the rets -- rest i submit. >> that thank you. >> that concludes new business. >>supervisor london breed: please address public comment. >> city clerk: at this time the public comment will include matters that are not on the board. public comment is not allowed on those items where public comment has been satisfied as is the case items 1-18.

pursuant to the rules board of orders please direct your remarks to the board and not to the audience. people needing translation, will be loud extra time. if you have a document, please inform sf govtv. >>supervisor london breed: those with disabilities may move forward and speak first. first speaker, please. >> i would like to use the overhead. my name is colette brown. i always come here concerning my son. aubrey abrakasa. he was killed by a gun. today there is no solving of

his homicide. we are also with an organization called the hilly circles. -- healing circles for mothers and fathers who have lost their children to homicide. i also want to bring up the fact that the young lady killed at pier 14. mayor lee is honoring her with a placard but not other murdered victims. what about our children . i brought that item up last time. i think he owes us an apology for the mothers and fathers who lost their children. i still remember him saying we can't give dead people jobs. i was traumatized by that and i think there should be an apology for

that we are out here every tuesday and thursday, mothers and myself. asking ed lee to talk to us, to give us some acknowledgment that we are out here. also we fight for other young men and mothers and fathers who have lost they are children to homicide. gave in news some said i know who killed your child, the police know who killed your child and they have names and they can name addresses. so these are the names that mayor former mayor has. thompson hannibal, paris moffat, andrew videau, jason thomas, anthony hunter.

these are all people involved with killing my child. these names didn't get pulled out of a hat. chief suhr gave these to me. >> next speaker, please. >> tom gilberte. i'm going to use my wheelchair. my mother's birthday is today. and 7:00 is coming up weekly. last week we recognized two commendations the two workers. at south beach marina, we don't get that luxury. everybody is gone. there is no 10-15-year residents. even the techies can't afford it. a long term resident is important for any neighborhood. market rate

apartments is like a cavity in a neighborhood. any neighborhoods, all neighborhoods in the city. in my housing plan, part 3, freeze market rate rents, reset rate rents. old focus -- folks matter. i remember when i pop my knee and instead # -- stayed in the ocean. froze my knee and these old ladies would look out of their windows between these soap commercials and they said he is still there and they gave me my first jobs when i was on my crutches. they showed me what life is

relevant when it's passing you by. it's kind of me in a wheelchair. after part 5, i'm going to run out of time. i'm going to ask for myself and others, can we have more second, please. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, next speaker, please. >> i'm going to start. who murdered my grandson. who killed my grandson. i'm with the san francisco unified school district for 38 years. i'm the grandmother. he was 28 years old. shot and murdered before his 22nd birthday.

that quadruple homicide in january 9, 2013. we want justice for the four who were murdered january 9, 2015. we need this justice. we need to you make an arrest. there is evidences in this case. there was subject and you know who it is, but no one wants to make this arrest. it has been made, several, excuse me, we know, that the press have notified that the police department knows who murdered my grandson and the other three young men with several homicides regarding our people of color. it is evident that this is no

care for the so-called african american people here in san francisco. a people who have their culture and their language stripped in effects or evidence. well, we the hebrew hebrew culture community know our history and we continue to demand that this city be held accountable for the unsolved murders. we want justice. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> i'm in a state of shock because of the horror of this board and the organizations in san francisco who are not prioritizing the murders of our african american children. here it is that mayor lee made

a statement concerning katie styleey which i bless their family. i'm thankful for what they are receiving. she was somebody. what our black boys not nobody. c'mon, let's get real, why do i have to sit here for 4-5 hours. no reward is given to these boys for the murdersment we are fighting every tuesday and thursday. not one black person came from these organizations to help us every tuesday and thursday at 1:00. when i tried to find out what the meeting was today t leader of the organization shut me up. i just talked to the people outside who said it was embarrassing with the way i was treated. i went to washington d.c. and treated lie a -- like a dog by this woman named maggie scott. everyone of

you are going to be persecuted. she represented hers. you are going to represent ours. you are going to represent san francisco. i just talked to ward. there want no districts. they are unified. how many more african american boys have to be killed. this woman got a plaque and everybody is talking about. our children were murdered 9 months ago. when is it going to take understanding. he knew what time it was, gave names. but did they call that her son was getting a reward? what's going on around here. i'm not playing a political game with you.

>>supervisor london breed: thank you. next speaker, please. public speaker: madam president, members of the board, i waited on my hopefully temporary disabled privilege because i didn't want to come in front of these mothers because i believe they have been disabled as well. i don't believe you lose a child and remain the same. i don't think you lose a child and remain very logical.

i don't know how you approach that loss in a way that you can always make everybody happy when you are hurting. so i wanted to just wait until they were finished to just say a couple of things as some of you may or may not know. i live at frederick douglas haynes garden. what's happening is real personal to me. it is of tremendous concern. but the concern is larger than frederick douglas hanes. i have said it before and if i haven't let me say it now. we live not only san francisco but all over the country. we live in a period in the country where the wealth cover the neighborhood of the poor. if we don't take action to protect them, the leaders will be there.

we always welcome the wealthy. we couldn't do anything about it because we didn't have any money. they are doing what they want because they have the money. we are never going to solve it. there is an article that i will send to all of you that talks about that 8 or 9 most progressive cities in the country and how racist they are according to san francisco, seattle, wisconsin, portland. austin texas, the most progressive cities. >> thank you, next speaker. public speaker: >> thank you, president breed. my name is christopher dall and i live 14 meters from sea level here to comment on environmental impacts. compared to the congress, the

factual lapses of some of you to at leaster on the side of caution with the house energy committee asserts that humans have no impact on the environment. it would be so easy and so very emotionally satisfying if karmically disasters on her directly. all i would have to do is encase her in a bubble. a bubble impervious to any change above the environment. a bubble which would trap her in her own exhaust fumes. what would be the result. in a few minutes she would pass out and in another she would lose higher brain functions such as though maybe and finally she would die. how is that for one human being's environmental impact. this

wouldn't be necessary but for people to understand what we need is energy, fresh water and new trees and translated for a recent visitors, this is -- [ indiscernible ] and to >> thank you. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> not another country in the world is in the streets. it's a death sentence. very

nice. like hitler sent to concentration camps. this is united states and on the street. people eating from the garbage can, drinking from the garbage can. never saw doctors. it's fascist country, united states in san francisco. god punished them.

>>supervisor london breed: thank you. next speaker, please. public speaker: good evening. i know you are tired and so am

i. another problem. i didn't hear a word from god. i guess i'm on the wrong wavelength. anyway, this is about legs. i never realized how many people have leg problems young and old and can't stand in an up right balancing position for long periods of time. in a study they provide ample places where people can sit and rest their sore and swollen legs. they are called parks where they can gatsd gather in parks like new york city central park. we have union square but we need scattered seating where we can sit and rest especially the

homeless and those that live in one bedroom apartments. yes, they do need to be maintained, the parks and benches of course. that's part of a living society. we spend thousands of dollars providing footraces in the city but very little for rest stops. oh yeah, i know, but how about the homeless. but they need the rest too. they can't step on the sidewalk because that's illegal. i guess it still is. i don't know. thank you for listening. >> thank you, next speaker, please. public speaker: my name is marion jackson. she wanted know talk about the

african american community relations board. it was established on mayor willie brown when he was in office and we would like to see that again because it actually address the crisis in the black community whether it was police or housing, the black community needs a say so in how we are treated in the community. the african american community relations board was one of the ways we addressed those issues. we also want to talk about community policing. we think community policing need to be in our communities because that's the wave of the future and it gives the community an opportunity to participate in how they are policed. we want to involve in the training of our new police officers and we want to get the community more involved in

community activities. i want to thank president for letting me speak today. thank you, president breed. >> thank you, mr. jackson. next speaker, please. public speaker: good evening, my name is fred jordan. i'm the president of the san francisco african american chamber of commerce and i would imagine some of you have heard a little bit about the chamber. we've been around since 1973. this is my third term. i know that we are very as astounded about this bustling economy in the city. they say that high waters raise all votes, but it hasn't raised the votes of the black community. jobs and contracts and we do have an out migration here and i know that many of you have heard about this out migration. we are not doing anything about it.

the out migration continues. it's gone from 18%, i don't care what they say about 14%. 18%. i came here in 1973 from school. i know it's down, way down. 6, 5. we need to do something about this as a body. you have probably heard about the threatened boycott of the chamber, of the black chamber. we had 62 people that came together to try to address that. they are not really hearing that much from the board. they promised a hearing. we were promised that we would get 1.5% of the wholesale tax to try to address the problem with the black community. we got nothing. there are grants all over the place, we got nothing. yoshi is our last culture. taken away. that's a business. you got

nothing. i'm asking this body to please pay attention to some of our problems. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> good evening, president breed and members of the board. public speaker: i'm with founders of the nation and san francisco grady campaign. president i stand before you today standing on the heroes of our former ancestors to let you know that it feels like jim crowe in san francisco. it really does. it's very sad that we are in the state that we are in. thank you supervisor avalos about your report. that is so true and so needed. with the outward migration with the black and brown.

our city and our communities are being taken over by developers and we have no opportunity and the mayor has closed it's door. today we went to the mayor's office and once again the door was shut. this really is a sad day for me because it does feel like jim crowe in san francisco. that's what it feels like. i come to speak on behalf of the lost ones. there was not a plaque given in honor of these two people. demario killed the same month as katie style us. he was the grandson. it will be 20 years next year that i will be celebrating my son's anniversary and speaking of the four homicides

taken last year. we hit the streets in january. i expect the board to be sensitive to this issue that our community are hurting and suffering. i know you have done an excellent service in serving us at the conference center. friday past was a national day of remembrance. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. next speaker, please. public speaker: good evening, board of supervisors, president, and all the people who stayed in the midst of this long meeting. i know everyone is tired. my name is carlotta jackson. i'm with true foster family

services agency. what i want to say to the board is that we are actually suffering from a stat of emergency. the actual violence in san francisco an we need a partnership including the mayor. what i want to say is our agency has been at this for 26 years here in san francisco and we service the poorest of the poorest families. so for example in district 10, there are multiple at least 5 hud housing complexes and the families there are babies and children who are put in positions where they are in what else can i say but poorhousing situation. the reality is that because of the

economic divide, i know san francisco is a beautiful city. we all want to live here, but because of the booming of the economy, the reality is that we have families who who are white are $110,000 and the median families are $29,000. there are mother with their babies in the street. there need to be a better connection with the community and our government officials. i'm begging that you would touch your heart. >> thank you. thank you very much. next speaker, please. public speaker: my name is richard dickson. good evening, i would like to

thank dr. breed for honoring dr. brown. it's an honor to be here on this day and to honor our true civil rights pioneer. i'm also deputy director of california's congress of racial equality. we participate in the martin luther king jr. parade every year. i would like to invite you all to los angeles on his birthday. i'm also on the board of inner city youth. we try to prepare young men to be responsible citizens and not suffer atrocities of being in prison, jail and not supervised by public

defenders and this is the cottage industry on our youth. i'm fighting with dr. brown for our economic rights and it is a true crisis in san francisco. i'm ceo of a pharmaceutical company, the only licensed pharmaceutical company in america right here in san francisco. we tried to negotiate with the city. he spent $26 million on pharmaceuticals and not anything in the african american community. we buy a lot of the pharmaceuticals. we need your support. i'm going to be talking to all of you. we are negotiating with the san francisco general at the present time. when we come to you, i hope you give us your support. thank you. >> thank you, next speaker,

please. public speaker: good evening, supervisor breed and other supervisors. i'm really appalled at how this meeting was carried out. personally i have been here since 1:15. everybody is exhausted. supervisors are laying around. you don't want do hear us. here we are at the end. redevelopment i can't stand. they lie and they come in to destroy, take away, and i say destroy, that's what i mean. to take away our livelihood, our homes. they want to come in and build it up. we can't afford it. the majority can't do that. they say we are going to do this and that. they are lying. they are not going to do it. when you go e to washington d.c. to talk to hud ks you let them know that the hud representative in san francisco are lying to us too. they are trying to take our homes. they want to take our homes and take

it back to the city and the county of san francisco. it's wrong. it's a process they go through to get it back in their hands so you will control everything. ed lee, i'm not going to teacher's -- call him the mayor anymore, he's not my mayor. he didn't come to our classes. he's not my mayor. i will not vote for him again. these on board with the redevelopment and the developers from out of town, china, new york city and wherever they come from to take over our community. the black community, the black porter, we are going to do everything we can to stop them. we are not going to support them and that's the way we feel in the black community. please, if you will stop giving this redevelopment all this lead way. you know what you are doing. you can talking to them behind closed

doors, there is money moving around but we are not being benefited by it. we can't get this in our community. >> thank you, next speaker, please. >> good evening, madam -- public speaker: my name is turner at the baptist church. as we know the san francisco is challenged with rent which is skyrocketing. apartments are held like the garden which was developed specifically for these families displaced during the urban renewal. those apartments must be preserved. the petition to support the board of supervisors and also mayor ed lee to ensure the commissioners

are fired and returned to the baptist church. the board of supervisors need to prevent them from selling this as additional property. additionally we request the board of supervisors, mayor ed lee and hud to work with baptist to assure that hanes garden remains affordable and to help renovate this complex as well. our prayer is that this city of saint francis recognize that this is an opportunity to lead and influence the nation regarding this request. lastly we request a meeting with the mayor to work on these departments together we need to hear his plan in preserving and rebuilding in

diversifying. if he's listening, we need a meeting. we need a vision to restore and rebuild affordable housing. lastly we invite you to join us to hear dr. hanes as we are in revival tonight. >>supervisor london breed: thank you very much. next speaker. public speaker: i know how we live in a society where there is all kind of possibilities of how the fine points are affected on the housing outcome. for example i know when we try to control crime in the tenderloin, i know the possibility exist it may create stress in the other neighborhoods in the bay area. we are seeing some effects for something that is like an

economy. part of that economy is a very low interest and causing our unstable economy. if i'm the first one to say, to be yelling at janet, damn it, janet. i will do it. one other thing i heard today which is a little bit inaccurate. someone said our garbage collection is the best system in the world. it's certainly a misstatement. we have a high resource consumption level concerning the rest of the world. when we are considering our garbage, we are basically flat on the amount of garbage we producing and the recycling process itself creates a lot of pollution and again rates a lot of energy consumption. we are no where near having the

system that is the answer, that you know that's all i got. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, next speaker, please. >> president breed, members of board. i was listening to the alex jones show and he was interesting congressman walter jones who i pray will be the next speaker of the house. and i literally went door knocking around my neighborhood and told people to tune your radio i was hoping he was going to interview walter joevenlts but sealed up for reasons of so-called national security. there is nothing in there about

national security. if you want to know about what national security means, study jessie ventura who studied jfk assassination. he knows what he's talking about. all fingers point to the prince in saudi arabia which is quarterbacking that. and he removes his kings that walter jones be the next speaker of the house. jesus was the speaker of the house in the temple and he sfed anyone man -- let him come to me and drink. he that believe in me shall flow. in other words jesus had to die on the cross for our sins and raised from the dead in order for the spirit to

be poured out. god can only have mercy on the death. jesus pointed it time and time in the scripture. it shall be that day that living water shall go from jerusalem half from sea. >>supervisor london breed: thank you. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. madam clerk can you please read the item for adoptions without reference to committee. city clerk: item 55, approval of a 60-day extension for planning commission review on all ordinance. >>clerk, please call the roll. city clerk: supervisor tang, supervisor

mar, supervisor wiener, aye, supervisor yee, aye, supervisor avalos, aye, supervisor breed, aye, supervisor campos, supervisor christensen, aye, supervisor cohen, aye, supervisor farrell. there are 10 ayes. >>supervisor london breed: the resolution is adopted unanimously. mad clerk will be read in memoriams. city clerk: at the request of president breed for miss stacy michelle dawson. >>supervisor london breed: okay, this brings us to the end of our agenda, madam clerk is there any further business before us? city clerk: that concludes the business of the day. >>supervisor london breed: thank you very much. we are adjourned. [ meeting is adjourned ]

>> >>

as we bring events in the city, and know that we have partnerships throughout the communities, i think, there is a lot more confidence about what we're doing and it's exhibited by the people who tap into our sf72.org. you remember that? [laughter ] , as well as the very enthusiastic support we have for our nert program. and for the ongoing resiliency programs that a number of people have had, and to our resiliency officer, who is helping dem and city administrator think through things around the corner that we need to pay attention to. there are a couple of things that i also want to do. let me say thank you to all of you who have also helped in