our files to see if i can find a more extensive analysis of some of the thinking that went into the conclusions to not include it in the land use plan for the future of treasure island. we certainly -- i have a long history in my career of working with the san francisco fire department, and understand the important role that the fire training facility plays in the department's programs, and i look forward to working with them and the department of real-estate as appropriate to evaluate potential future sites for the fire training facility or for its potential continued presence on treasure island. if the continued use of the navy facility has been viewed largely as an interim use, since the base was closed, and so moving forward, we would need to do a full environmental

analysis for either continued operation of an existing or rehabilitated facility or a new facility on treasure island and recommend that be treated as a distinct project rather than reevaluating our program. but understand the role that the facility plays and the need for such a facility and we look forward to working with the fire department and the city to do that evaluation. >> so there anything in the agreement with the navy that prohibits tita from allowing the training facility to remain at its current location? >> there's nothing in the agreement with the navy that would prohibit the facility from continuing, but the adopted development plan for treasure island and the land use for treasure island did not anticipate the fire training

facility and so its continued operation as a permanent facility and function would need to undergo environmental evaluation. >> and it would be something that the tita board would need to approve, not necessarily anything else? >> it would need to be approved by the tita board and it would need to be approved by the board of supervisor and we need to evaluate it. >> we could run into some challenges with that. >> yeah, there are certainly a number of complex issues that we need to -- would need to be evaluated that would be you know, potentially significant hurtles to continue operations on they land in a permanent

function. >> i don't recall in the initial discussions the -- i vaguely recall the fire training facility being considered more long term, so i guess i'm just trying to understand what happened that took it out of the mix as more of a permanent location. i know for example, the brig and the police academy and other discussions around other city department zs -- and those were moved out of the fix, but i wasn't under the impression -- the fire training academy was supposed to be considered long term. >> that's apart of the area i'm still investigating. you know the treasure island department program underwent a lengthy planning process between the

time that the base was identified for closure and ultimately closed in the time that the land use -- the dir and the land use plan was adopted in 2011. and were in that timeline the decision -- and where in that timeline it wasn't including the timeline -- and the basis of that decision is something i'm researching. >> i would say things change. it has been going on for many, many years, trying to move treasure island forward in a certain direction, developing housing and parkland, and in the meantime, i know there's a lot of empty spaces and spaces that can and can't be used, but i'm very familiar with the fire training academy, and this is one of those particular spaces that i think is being used well

and serves the city well. i think when things like this happen and things change, we ought to adjust to those changes, and so i would definitely like for tita to really do whatever it can to try and keep the training facility at this location permanently. if that's a possibility to work on a level of agreement that could lead to that. it's important for our city. our city is growing, and i'm not suggesting that treasure island to bear the blunt of this growth, but treasure island is apart of the city. tita is apart of the city and sometimes decisions need to be made to make adjustments when we need space for a purpose of this nature, which is a real public safety issue, so i would strongly suggest that we really explore this and try to come up with something a lot more permanent so we don't find ourselves in

the situation where the development is happening and we're out luck and facility closes down and we're trying to figure out what we're going to do. this could impact the quality of life, not just residents all over the city, but those residents who live on treasure island because we need a place like this to train our work force. we're growing and we're going to be hiring more firefighter and we need the space to train them and this is an important part of that. i'm hopeful that could be taken into consideration with the tita board and i'm hopeful the mayor's office is heavily involved in this as well in trying to get us moving in the right direction. >> yeah. well, we certainly, you know, this is a very good time for us to be having this conversation. we're beginning the development effort now. and we have about 7 years or

potentially more before the existing site would be affected by development. so we do have a window of opportunity here to evaluate whether continued presence on treasure island is viable, and if not, what i'll alternative locations might be, and where we might be able to secure a site that we'll be able to support such a facility. it is a -- we look forward to working with the fire department and the city, the department of real-estate and the planning department on that evaluation effort. >> i can speak for -- i'm only speaking for myself, but as a member of the board, if there were approvals that were required of me that involved the development and the property and didn't involve a well-thought out plan that would allow for permanent location department, i'm not certain i would be supportive

of that plan, so i want to put that out there moving forward, so hopefully something can be done. >> yeah. >> thank you. >> yep. >> thank you, mr. becon. >> i concur with supervise breed on this position. i haven't been able to visit the facility itself, but from the feedback i've gotten from rank and file, people that have gone through training, they speak highly of it, and if it's going to help us save lives in the long run, we need to make adjustments so that our firefighters are best prepared, that they could be. so anything you could do to help that along, i certainly would be very appreciative of that. thank you. >> thank you. >> any public comments on this issue? >> i did have some more questions. >> okay. >> do you want to finish them? >> i did have some questions

for the chief. thank you for your presentation. i know that -- i mean, i didn't find the report surprising as you probably know, mostly because of the strategic planning part of the report, i've always been concerned about the department, and the fact that the department did not have a strategic plan to deal with staffing, to deal with the equipment, to deal with a number of challenges that the department faces especially when there were really challenging budget times and there had to be cut made and i understand that. i guess, i'd like to understand a little bit more, you know, when the last strategic plan, when and if there were a strategic plan done for the department, and can you explain a little bit more - i know the civil grand jury report is focused on the fire training facility as well the engines and the houses, but

can you explain exactly, you know, what kind of strategic plan you're working on. is it a comprehensive plan or is it more specific to what's in the civil grand jury report? just a little bit more information for the department. >> supervisor yee, chair breed, the goal is comprehensive for a road map for the next three to four five years. we worked on a streej -- we worked on a strategic plan in 2005. there's plenty of plans that exist, but it's putting them into one single document. we've had a hiring plan since 2012. that was in conjunction with the mayor's office. in the next three fiscal years, we anticipate hiring roughly 375 firefighters and anticipate 200 to 375 retirements. we did a lot of that work, but it doesn't exist in a single

document. you've spent time on fire commission, we've had an apparatus plan that has been approved by the staff. our budget reflects that request. the difficult part is that has not been funded to the extent that the plan calls for, so the plan exist, funding has been an issue and that's probably our biggest initiatives coming up, which was not in the grand jury report, but we were making plans for apparatus to make sure we have appropriate apparatus standards. the plan will be comprehensive to address the two components of the civil grand jury report, ems and training, but also fleet, health and wellness, community outreach, it will be very comprehensive.

>> and for the engine -- i mean, for the houses like -- i know there's been bonds that has been passed by the voters, the amount of money that we, say, in the bonds we were using for the fire houses aren't the amount of money we're using for the fire houses. i wanted to know, are there any plans to address long term, some of the challenges with some of the houses? i know that we're -- we're completely doing station 5 and station number 1. a brand new station. we have the new emergency -- the arson unit and others -- speaker: public safety buildings. >> public safety buildings, thank you. we have a number of things that's happening, but we still have a lot of challenges with our fire houses and so our -- do we have, other than that i know the city's capital's plan and information about what we plan to do city wide, is

there any plan with the department in terms of the fire houses as apart of the strategic plan, that will be incorporated into the strategic plan in terms of the standard of every facility should make sure that it's a safe environment? particularly, it's a 24/7 facility. we have a work order funding into the department of public health, and we have an hygenist on board. we have been blessed by the bond funding. we would not -- maintenance has been an issue throughout my 25 plus year career in the station. we've always been, in my opinion, underfunded. we have 50 plus facilities and what it boils down to is less than $100,000 a year. it's more

than 25,000 per facility. without these bonds, 2010 and 2014, we would be not in very good shape. we definitely need adequate funding for our facilities. we understand there's going to be -- our strategic plan will make sure we have proper funding for these aging facilities. you referenced station 1 on fulsome, station 4 in mission bay, but most of the facilities are 50, 60, 70-year-old and it's like the hmo philosophy. the maintenance has been delayed. can you talk a little about response times and where we are now since this report came out? i know we have more ambulances. i know we're

hiring more paramedics and we have more paramedic on the street and there's the information regarding pair mets that are -- regarding paramedics at the station. are there 24-hour a day paramedics in the station. if you talk about that? >> we have seen an improvement. a drop in our response times. the problem we were having wasn't getting a fire -- it was the third timeframe, the 10-meantime frame. we have seen a drop in that due to the investment in staffing as well as apparatus. so we are 87% of the time, we're responding within our timeframe for code 3 emergencies. >> that's less than ten minutes, right.

>> ten minutes or less. so the threshold we like to see, which for a number of years, not just last year, to have -- in 90 percentile has been a challenge for us. we continue to be challenged given traf patterns, given the increase in call volume, but we have seen significant improvement since last year of this time. regarding the paramedics, last year, due to staffing, we dropped to 27 fire engines that had als capability. so als means advance life -- there's a basic life support certified person. $27 fire engines that had als capability. so als means advance life -- there's a basic life support certified person. the vast majority of response by our department can be achieved and treated by a bls training person. it's evaluated to have a paramedic on the engine. we've seen

those paramedic engines rise from a 27 to 33 out of 44. at this point -- that is addressed in the civil grand jury report. at this point, we are more than meeting that 7-minute threshold to have an als provider on scene within the 7-minute timeframe. that has never been a problem for us. and we will continue to analyze the all als engine model which i think has a lot of positives to it, and that you have every engine with the same training -- level of training and that's something we're looking at and we'll probably discuss during the budget season. >> okay. thank you. >> okay. thank you very much. at this time, i'd like to see if there's any public comments on this item. seeing none.

public comment is now closed. i do have one more question though. prior to training facilities that you have access to on treasure island, where did we do our training? >> we were training at 19th and fulsome. there's a large training tower there adjacent to station 7. when i first came in, we had a limited sort of live burn which the epa would certainly, in this day in age would not allow. we would have a smoulder fire down in a basement at 19th and fulsome. that went away in the mid-90s. we had discussions way back then under chief demins and chief tabaco and chief -- i worked for all three of them as director of training and we

really felt that it was valuable as set for our -- a valuable asset for our members and getting -- >> thank you very much. >> i'm sorry, i forgot to ask, where are we with the eoa and are we in compliance at this time with the eoa. >> the exclusive operating area that you're referring to an 80/20 market share. 80% being from the san francisco fire department and 20% by the two private providers as apart of that operating area. we're not quite at 80%. their most recent statistic is 85%. >> i know when we were experiencing the height of our crisis, that the private ambulance companies were

helping the city out which i figured may create a challenge in terms of the eoa, but most important, we wanted to make sure there were ambulances out there on the street, and so -- we're working with the private companies a lot more than we have before, but what do you think -- what would you attribute the change, the increase in our commitment to the eoa too? i would say definitely the infusion of additional staffing we hired in april and one of the things i didn't indicate, but it segways into your question, we did something -- just last weekend, we debuted a model so if we

have a surge period of time in the city or we have a discretionary leave, we have trained fire department individuals who come in. a -- >> are they making overtime? is it a per diem difference than overtime? >> i'm going to ask mark to talk about that. i might ask dr. ya to speak about the era. we're going to address -- >> okay. thank you. >> good afternoon, it's a per diem employee. it's not overtime. this is for employees that are not regularly employed by the

department or employed elsewhere and come work on a part-time basis with the department. >> got it. that's creative. >> thank you, supervisors. i was asked by the chief to mention something about the eoa compliance. a lot is true. we don't meet our goals in terms of market shares. the state has recognized that the important thing is we're providing the services to our citizens. we want to jeopardize that in sake of meeting a number. externally and internally, there's pressure on making sure the processes are in place so we can meet them. that is that we have the infusion of both measures that will make our facility more efficient and allowing more staff to get to 80/20. it's recognized by the state as well as by all of our eternal partners, the privates that we want to get to the

80/20, although it will take time. >> great, thank you. >> did i close public comments yet? i haven't. >> thank you. >> thank you, public comment is now closed. first of all, i would like to thank petty and jack for being here and presenting and for the grand jury that has worked on this issue. you know, this is a very important issue. we want to keep our city as safe as possible. and as much as we might have non about these issues in the past, it's helpful sometime to highlight and say we need to get some things done. to me, it's not

just the fire department by themselves getting it done, but it would take all us to support the fire department whether it's from the budget process or the mayor saying, let's go hire some more folks to fill in the vacancy. let's get what we need. i know this has been an important issue for supervisor breed and for myself. i'm ready to continue to support the efforts of the fire department to get us to -- it seems like we're moving in right direction. so would you like to make anymore comments? >> yes, thank you to the members of the civil grand juries for investigating issues. i know over the past, i guess, year or so, i was really highlighting this issue because of the challenges that many of my residents faced in

our district with ambulance response times and i must say that the investment has definitely made a difference, although there is still a lot more work that needs to be done to get us to where we need to be as a city with the department overall. the fact that the board of supervisors and the mayor have invested a significant dollar amount, over $30 million, additional funding to hire more firefighters -- to hire more paramedic and to try and support the department in a significant way is really commendable. i do think that we definitely need a strategic plan. we definitely need to understand exactly where we are in the department, where we are in the equipment, with our engines, with our facilities,

with our employees. more so because when i first started serving on the commission, i recall there were one year there were over 70 people or 80 people that retired in that one year, and i thought to myself, okay, if we're not bringing on 80 people to replace those people, number one, what are we -- how are we filling those positions, but more importantly, that's a lot of institutional knowledge that's walking out the door. the city needs to do a better job to make sure we don't wait 10 years before we have a class or waiting 10 years to replace equipment or waiting 10 years before we develop a strategic plan. we have to think long term so we can make sure as we approve this development, as we add over the past -- i guess

since 1991, over 100,000 residents, and we're expected to have another 100,000 over the next ten years. we have to keep an eye over the departments. it's really important and i appreciate the work that has been done by the civil grand jury to shed a light on this and i appreciate the department on improving the issues that has been in the department. and lastly, i want to say i do think it's important that, you know, and just for clarity sake, treasure island authority is apart of the city. the members of the commission are appointed by the mayor, approved by the board of supervisors and there's a process here. i understand there are a lot of, sometimes

red tape or legal issues that tie us to certain agreements, but the fact that there has been no leadership to address making sure that this particular training facility would somehow apart of treasure island's long-term plan. i'm not certain how this ball got dropped and i do think that we need to look at this issue very seriously and try and figure out something a lot more permanent because this is about public safety, and treasure island is apart of san francisco, and we hold the authority on what happens with treasure island and we need to be a lot more aggressive when making sure that a facility like this, that provides this level of training for people who are protecting our lives every single day is definitely the least we can do, is make

sure they have a state of our facility to train at. and so this is really important to me and i'm hoping that this sounds of alarm for that particular piece of well. thank you to everyone who is here. thank you to the commissioners i see in the audiences and other members of the department. and i look forward to, hopefully, you know, as time progresses, you know, an even more significant change in the department. thank you. >> so can we have a motion to file item number 3. >> yes. so moved. >> no objection, the motion passes. madam clerk. thank you very much, madam clerk. before we entertain a motion to convene in closed session. can you call item 4-6. >> item number 4-6 authorizes

for approving settlements against the city and county of san francisco. >> before we entertain a motion to go to closed session, is there a member from the public that wishes to speak on items 4-6? >> just for con -- confirmation number 3, was it to call or call to the chair? >> file. >> thank you. >> okay. so can i have a motion -- i see no public comments. public comment is closed. could i have a motion to convene in closed session. speaker: so moved. >> motion passes. >> deputy, the committee voted by a vote 2-0 to forward 4, 5

and 6 with positive recommendation. >> supervisor, can i have a motion to not disclose what happened in closed session? >> so moved. >> no objection. motion passes. madam clerk, is there anything else on the agenda. >> no further business. >> if there's nothing further, the meeting is now adjourned. thank you very much.

>> good afternoon good afternoon, everyone. everyone the meeting will come to order this is the regularly middle east of the san francisco land use & economic development committee to my right is is supervisor scott wiener and to my left is is supervisor jane kim our clerk alicia i'd like to thank jennifer lowe and jessie larson sfwr sfgovtv for broadcasting this meeting madam clerk madam clerk, any announcements? >> questions all electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the october 27th board of supervisors agenda unless

otherwise stated. >> all right. thank you so much call item one. >> on ordinance for 10 61 to change the sidewalk at the westerly at silver and portions of rearview mirror here and we have oh, possible if dpw and then i building a representative from the school district to comment mr. >> harry from the department of public works this is a standard sidewalks legislation louis a drop off in front of the willie l. brown middle school went through the standard calibrations and city planning as approved the task and fire department so all the major groups have agreed on the legislation and moving forward to the board any other questions

i object to answer them. >> this is clean and straightforward representative from the school district to make a short presentation thank you, mr. rooir. >> hello. >> hello. >> are you speaking on this item or in 3789. >> cooperative you don't have is a public comment. >> a school district representative. >> no general contractor give me a minute you'll be able to speak. >> colleagues i don't know if you have any concerns let's go ahead and open up for public comment open up for public comment is open people have two minutes to speak and soft chime 30 seconds remaining

sir if you want to come up now is your opportunity and again, any member of the public can speak. >> thank you, welcome. >> i'm not sure i don't have is a comment noted sure. >> are you in favor. >> that's a comment we'd like to take it thank you. any other member that want to speech in favor or against this project. >> i'm francisco i filled out my card i think anyone chairs a meeting like this they have to respect the audience or the people who come here following some protocol this is an important issue not to be taken lightly it is a school millions of dollars have been spent it was an openly and is opening took place 9 of the

manners of the americans with disabilities act was in patrolling place we have dpw and some other person didn't know why he's here but essential here and in favor of that so how can we spend millions of million dollars of dollars state of the art school the higher principal that apparently jumped ship that's not the point out today, the point is this city has to abide by the americans with disabilities act i was a project manager when i worked at the presidio of san francisco i took all the classes with at depth of the embroider i know something about it so supervisors that's not take things ashley make comments like

straightforward english this is not about english this is about technicalities this is about standards, which leads tomorrow's ethics thank you very much. >> members of the commission public comment is closed. is clotted colleagues get to motion to i move we send it to the full board with a positive recommendation thank you very much looks like we have unanimous support so that motion carries unanimously thank you. >> all right. marking call u call item 2. >> an ordinance amending the planning code by the sustainability fee and the transit impact fee and declaring the homeless shelters declarations. >> colleagues we've heard this after making several amendments

we were required to renotice the changes to the legislation we've been notified by the planning department of technical amendments they would like for the committee to clarify a change we made last week we have mr. corey here joining us from the planning department here to speak on that issue corey i'd like to call you up. >> thank you supervisor cowen and supervisors corey with the go planning the president those are not substantive but clarification the formulate in the document handed to you all is the same formulate as the last land use commission hearing i'll go through them page and line and i object to answer any questions on page 9 lines 9 to 11 clarified grairt the way the

language was drafted whether or not you were begin for gashth action a application was filed before a date or after a certain date as you may know they have multiple application you could have a application breaking and entering to make the language clear the intent that certain projects with application after certain date will not be subject to any grandfathering that is all the language that it does and on page 11 line 6 through 25 and then page 12 lines 6 through 17 we added a new subsection with a fee methodology as you recall you created a tiered fee for residential projects essentially a higher fee for any component of a residential

project representing the one dwelling unit and above unfortunately, we didn't have a method for the one hundred units and above so the methodology we created a proportional methodology in the dwelling units at one hundred and above 25 percent of the dwelling units the higher rate will be applied to the entire rate for the project that includes thienz lobbies and hallways and other dwelling units essentials we just want the table to support that calculation and made that distinct and not additives so the higher squeegees and rents will pay both rates that's the clarification language and lastly on page 20 lines 6 and 7 we proposed amending the faebd

looking at the feasibility by neighborhood and changed that to ear the definition of neighborhood is difficult and different for different people and adams the language to the extent possible i'm available to answer any questions. >> thank you very much that's it on the staff presentation when i'd like to do is go to direct to public comment i see a few people in the audience public comment is open a reminder 2 minutes. >> public comment? >> oh, thank you. >> i'm sorry, i just got the speakers so first up

(calling names). >> thank you. >> you're welcome. >> good afternoon, members david with the hospital council i'm here again with the members of our council that stated shoulder or shoulder to shoulder unified in our position that the city's elimination and removal of the none for profit hospitals is public policy with kaiser permanente and chinese hospital are dignity and st. francis and you've heard from c pmc several put if this ordinance is adapted will decrease the resources for hospitals to do their charitable giving and spread out and increase the costs of health care for hospitals and their members the commercially insured and retirees and all those

categories so we ask that the exception be restored and the ordinance thank you thank you for your time. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors i guess my handwriting is not great abby with the sfrarns hospital i'm here 0 urge you for a run statement for the hospital transportation together the hospitals in san francisco serve the majority by far san francisco residents regardless of their ability to pay we worked together on a lot of the community benefits work clgdz the chinatown health fair st. francis focuses on the health felt residents some of the poorest and most difficult health outcomes of the residents in the tenderloin each the hospitals have a very

focused community benefit work and together we very the san francisco height partner that has a retreat last week and look at it looked how to improve the health of the vulnerable across the city and reinstate the hospital exemption into the ordinance thank you. >> thank you next elizabeth. >> hello supervisors elizabeth from kaifrp thank you for having us here i wanted to ask on behalf of the kaiser permanente that we reinstate the hospital exemption modern hospital construction requires and we're happy happy to fulfill that our members have single private rooms within the hospitals your hospital have a larger footprint but not having more patients within the hospitals that means they're not janitor more trips with more

people that is related to the seismic standards and the quality of patient within the hospital as well as the technology load within a patient's room is quite substantial all the hospital rooms have large monitor so the physicians and patient can enter fats without the physician making a round of applause there is quite a few of the equipment and a larger room than a previous hospital we're in support of transportation demand management program we support many, many programs within the thank you walking and biking and commuter ride sharers r ryder and other health systems chiu our mission bay wire working a transportation plan with uflsz and other institutions so we don't create mover traffic in the area i will say on behalf of the cookies would our hospital

and our own hospital we keep the exception in thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm stuart fong at chievens hospital they support the run statements of the unfortunate hospitals in the equipment thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors dee dee workman from the chamber of commerce the chamber of commerce and our partners are really very confront with the legislation as amended in the last land use commission with the exception of removing the hospitals from the charitable exception we feel strongly the hospitals should fall under the charitable exception k exception they're the grandmother of all charitable services provider and as you've heard multiple times give the seismic retrofitting process they have too often

stand the sites not expanding the patient load their employee numbers or the impacts on transportation so we feel strongly the hospitals should remain under the charitable exception the charm has been working with a broad range of groups looking for and trying to find new fivengd u fund to renovate, upgrade your transportation system we're a partner but we've supported you know the transportation bonds of l f and other federal, state, and local and taking the which i shouldn't programs is a departure and a bit of a breach of faith we urge you to put the hospitals back in under the charitable exception thank you. >> so supervisors normally when you get an agenda there is

also legislative report and i spoke on one of the items and i got a report of all the legislative reports open every single item if you look at this agenda item it does not go too 0 deep with imperial data i don't know about the nonprofit hospitals but the sutter hospitals owe laugh money to the city billion dollars and that was discussed in this commission so that's not arley take all the hospitals under one umbrella but take to task an organization like the sutter hospital that has failed san franciscans having said that, there are a

number of progressions out this that talk about affordable housing and when you go in that to look at the blueprints we find for example, linked to producing 5 kind scrapers and you supervisors does nothing of the high density buildings around the embarcadero and that's wrong so i don't we have the the city has we is a have some attorneys i think you all should represent the people because i know our board of supervisors has failed to represent the people of san francisco. >> thank you. >> we have many matter with the political distributors and distribution of president fullness should be removed from

the mediation so clear up with self-nature sincerely of one wisdom with the working resolve the holy meeting of one destiny and self-nature that having a passion of feelings for relationship for the influence one is wisdom of self-nature of the combablts and cultural are part of the nature that could solve a nature of improvement and steps. >> is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak seeing none, public comment is closed. >> thank you for speaking out on this item. >> first colleagues may i have a motion on the technical amendments by the planning department thank you motion and second by my colleagues an unanimous motion that is

approved thank you. >> is there a motion well, i'll back up colleagues, any discussion on the underlying. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, madam chair and i do believe we should put this out of committee but i'll raise one clarification before we do at the last committee hearing and this for the latter part of it we were voting commissioner avalos voting and supervisor kim and the only issue we voted on where potentially the positions of commenting a different outcome is on the hospital exception a 2 to one i voted to keep it in and so before we put this out i think that would be good to know that accurately reflected the views of the committee fine and if not can i have a motion 0 supervisor kim

if commissioner avalos vote to remove the exemption is consistent with her point of view. >> i think i've expressed at committee meeting my concern for hospitals that i think do a lot of medi-cal and charity care and their ability to pay tsif pear for communities that don't have access to care at this time i'm not prepared to support this amendment i talked with the city attorney i apologize we called and left a voicemail not able to reach it was this more than he complete thinks to vet the different concepts will work i had a misunderstanding at land use commission an moped that was why a delay i, of course, want to be able to work with the

committee workers and supervisor cohen and the members. >> so first place through the chair conceptually to make a motion to reinstate the hospital motion as previously drafted would i vote or noted vote. >> i'll not feel comfortable at this time. >> so based on that i'll not make the motion but i will make a motion to forward this item to the full board with a positive recommendation for the november 3rd board meeting. >> all right. great. thank you very much motion has been made and second required let's take a roll call vote on this motion. >> on the motion to remedy the ordinance as amended supervisor kim. >> supervisor wiener. >> supervisor cohen. >> madam chair you have 3ize. >> this is passed to the

representation to the full board of supervisors. >> item 3 a resolution commissioners, on that motion interim controls in the transit plan area to restrict the size and height of signs within 200 feet and visual from the existing planning park and to restrict the signs in other areas. >> thank you very much supervisor kim is the author of this item and i will give her the mike at this time. >> thank you our office is still conducting emotions between stakeholders on this very issue we're requesting continuance two week continuance at land use commission and well, thank you very much that sounds great before we vote on the motion let's opening it up for public comment any members of the public that want to speak on item number 3 please come up.

>> okay. so no members of the public. >> item speak on item 3 public comment is closed. at this time. >> and colleagues, we can take this motion to continue that item before us to. >> november 2nd. >> november 2nd thank you without objection. >> art without objection that item passes thank you, madam clerk call items 34 and 5. >> ordinances for the planning department and zoning map to create the jewish home located on silver avenue and allowing an increase in height with proportion. >> thank you commissioner avalos is the author of this item i believe we have

legislative aide ms. shaw. >> ms. shaw from commissioner avalos before you we have to jeopardy plan amendment and the ordinance for the jewish special use district to allow for the expansion of that residential care facility in the excelsior located in the intersection of mission street and expanding the entire city block it has been serving the frail residents of the excelsior for over hundred years to expand their facilities with living space and other supportive uses we've been pleased with the community engagement on this process and worked collaborative with our office and neighbors in order to address the concerns of this type of development and make changes in order to better

integrate the facility with the fabric of the neighborhood on mission street and along the corridor we hope to have your support so the jewish home can continue to serve the communities most needy and vulnerable both items were heard in august and received a unanimous vote and mr. chang will answer any questions you might have as well as representatives from the jewish home. >> i think the next speaker will be tina changing and followed up by daniel from the jewish home is daniel here and ms. chang. >> thank you good afternoon chronicling and supervisors those are the amendments to the general plan and zoning map amendment to establish the jewish home of san francisco the

special use district the subject property coffers 9 acres with 5 buildings the may west building as shown in the red arrows to be demolished in the instead a construction of two new buildings the buildings 19 are 200 and 60 thousand square feet in size and providing approximately 200 and 10 residential care facility up to two hundred and 45 residents the home will create a square a new development it is buildings on the jewish campus to have a vied variability of uses by membership excuse me. o include medical officers and outpatient and focusing and salons and other centers. >> the home will provide up to

48 hundred square feet along the mission street frontage intended to activate the street to achieve the goals as described it creates a special use that requires a zoning map and planning code text amendment the amendment will simply remove the shading at the subject property for the height one of the zoning map amendments to add a boundary to the ftes as shown by the red doted line. >> the second amendment to 9 maps will include a plan map to the height and bulk where it currently shows a health and bulk of 50 x. >> and finally the planning code text amendment will add a

section to establish the jewish home the sud will allow the non-residential uses within the district and allow a smaller floor within the special use district the above images are the proposed construction that is the admitting frontage that provides a presence along mission street activating and providing existing square feet part of building is set back to better respect the neighbors height and bulk. >> this last image is the the exist landscaping and is also lower in height to the surrounding residential uses that concludes my presentation. i'll be happy to answer any questions i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you very much. we don't have any questions i'd like to invite our colleague up to offer information on this

item. >> good afternoon. my name is daniel ruth the wanting ceo of the jewish home in san francisco and held that post for the past 13 years next slide, please my expression of thanks our mission to enrich the jewish and non-jewish other jewish home provides services for over hundred and 45 years and serve the residents and patients on any given day the jewish home is the largest private nonprofit of nursing home care in the state and of the people that we serve on overwhelmingly amount of individuals on the medi-cal program we are rated as a 5 star facility for quality of care the highest possible next slide,

please. >> more many years the jewish home ran into a deficit in 2012 the state cut our medi-cal reimbursements by thirty percent bans our hard work with the state we were successful in 2014 in reinstating our reimbursement rate for medi-cal and residents on a grord basis, however, we were left with an $18 million retroactive liability from the deep cuts that that experience alone underscores the yooush home to respond to the demographic facts and circumstances those include won the tidal wave of aging baby boomers and two the recognition those baby boomers have different need and expectations and demands from the prior

generations and prefer to live at home or a residential type environmentalist and 3 the urge need to change the jewish final model to reduce the shining federal and state reimbursements as well unsustainable be levels of philanthropy and had the need to address the seismically challenged and updated centers that doesn't reflect the current standards so what are the results simply stated the proposed project is advances you are mission but allows us to remain in the excelsior district to serve an additional 200 and 48 residents on our campus in addition, we know that many older adults want to remain at home but it means at the suffer from depression and lonelyness

and challenging for caregivers to take them to the myriad of appointments throughout the most next slide, please. >> so we are proposing a revolutionary new model one we call the square to support older adults their family members and caregivers that want to continue to live at home and come to one local to have their social and medical and other needs met, in fact, did muth commissions found our mission will create the accessibility of primary care among the city's growing population next slide, please in short that enhanced assisted living and memory care in the square allows us to better serve a bigger psychopath of members and involves a robin hill model

the new uses help to subsidize our medi-cal's residents and better insult the homes from future budget cuts thank you very much. >> thank you, mr. rose presenter our work and service to the community let's - supervisor wiener your name is on the roster. >> thank you. >> all right. let's go ahead and take public comment at this time public comment is open. >> anybody who lives in district 9 and 11 passes by the jewish home and if you're more or less my age it is well known that this institution has done an excellent job what's important for this city to understand is that over 51

percent of our population are seniors and their noting not treated well and the city should look forward to an institution like the jewish home and there are a few others that the private foundations are kate so our seniors special those who are in ssi spend 90 percent of their income on rent and not taken care of. >> what the jewish community has 38 they have rich people i call them rich people who can if they follow the torah can setback

monies charity care my family is tied to the jewish community they preserve the torah in a particular country for three hundred years so i'm like some people that think whatever my affection i appreciate what they're doing for others in extending the health to others thank you very much. >> for my money matter the principle once a original destiny are allowed the responsive pathways for making successful destiny for failed relationships for the transient flow leading a new way of virtue

and accomplishment our well-being and personal reasoning are for holy pretends and wisdom one can apply tenant using everything for success and supervision and shatter decisions for creative action for prisoners of happening king virtual that fulfills the special force and well balance of harmonies for greater production of virtue of establishment holy nature to bring firm and secure of ones course of well planned and holy teachings and for these people and recognizing to be holy a principle of a superior freedom of united unit of the holy

methodologies so like dragons and like horse expressing strongly great height with the process and at the end and enforcement for the virtue and defying if i had planning and second so traveling for true self-nature and for the california probation of the production and structure and order nature advantage for the society and policies of for the numerous people in populations. >> wow. >> next speaker. >> excuse me. i'm a little bit horse can you hear me. >> we can. >> i'm marlene norman wearing to hats today, i'm representing the vice president of the outer mission merchants better known

as obama are i'm vice president and also worked at the jewish home i he was a social worker on the psychiatrist unit i reassigned but within 6 months i returned to the jewish home to return as a volunteer since i've been doing i have a profound appreciation for the home on the cutting-edge of elderly care with its ma many programs with the alzheimer's and units it serves the vunld members of the population i'm advocating for the proposed expansion of home i've tenant 3 community meetings to address the community concerns the first meeting was held at the home and substantially representatives came to a general meeting and

district 11 would you be able meeting i believe as the home will increases not only the residents population that will always be reaching out to other members for the community including elderly caregivers and in conclusion i urge you to vote in favor the legislative expansion while showing some people are in denial about climatic change of climatic change but no one ca can a say that have not grow in the meeting of those needs thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> my name is fran ginsburg and retired nurse sole practitioner and worked for kaiser permanente and managed care for kaiser permanente members of the jewish home and probably about every other nursing home in the city

and daily city i can say personally and professionally that the jewish home is a very special place i've been interested in older folks since i was a younger folk and now i'm won the way past baby boomer age i can personally is a this is a place that needs to be and needs to grow and although i would prefer to die at home and live my last year's in my own house as bruno heights my he next choice is the jewish home thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon i'm arlene as a long time service volunteer form board chair of the zuckerberg jewish home and now chair the jewish foundation i'm a true believer in the mission

and work of the home to enrich the quality of life of older adults our mission is worthy serving the underserved senior population and needed service in san francisco the campus is up to date we understand the needs for the judiciously home to renovate, upgrade their campus please support this amendment to help insure the jewish home can serve the senior population thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon. my name is a dawn i'm the parrot of anybody church in the excelsior district of san francisco i as pastor the governor bodies support the jewish home expansion and urge the city to approve approve this important project besides servicing the seniors they also

partner with our church and distribute free groceries to those who are insecure in the neighborhood feeding three hundred families every saturday and their incredible partners we urge you from the bottom of my heart to support this jewish home for the entire excelsior neighborhood thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good afternoon. my name is a steve i didn't the executive director of excelsior action group i'm here to express the supports for the approval of the general plan in the planning code that allows for the current expansion of the jewish home e a g is a great supporter and we believe that those amendments will allow the expansion of a much needed and supported resource in our community and add more density and aesthetically improve the

character of the corridor we have exceeded the standards and expectation we like to regard ourselves as community members and support the implementation of the current plan and therefore support the proposed amendments that brings up this to fruition thank you for your time. >> thank you. next speaker. >> hi, i'm dixie i'm and my husband dr. len walker move forward to san francisco 20 years ago a retired clinic fist and and a i was a most of the mother of 7 we had rich spiral perhaps at 87 my husband lift the bar but 6 months ago the state present challenges we county foresee and plan for or yield and len has claksdz and

end up at the jewish home for a short time and long term care, he saw jewish home as a miracle for our dark lives the administrators are skilled but our advertiser was keep up me husband lived for the physicals therapy in the gym i got to sing high head off around the piano treat him with kindness and good sense of humor do ask me how they do that incidentally i'm getting used to the sound of tagalog i wonder how many projects you're presented that have as their core motivate plan old fathers service i encourage you to make their

plans operational as a baby boomer age thank you. >> any other members of the public colleagues public comment is closed. at this time and colleagues the item is up for discussion. >> supervisor wiener i see your name on the roster. >> thank you, madam chair i just want to thank everybody that made this possible and strongly supportive i'll anytime it is personal this an institution that served many, many years and all are welcome at the jewish home for the an executive branch jewish clientele a large jewish population of seniors cared for

huge i humanely and with respect at the intersection institution we know we have a growing senior population with so many needs in terms of making sure that people are getting the care they require to be healthy and have terrific lives and know that families need assistance in caring for the seniors in their lives who when they're struggling to tell you provide the care at home so the jewish home has been a wonderful community institution for so many years and allow to continue and increase the services is it provides i will also is that the aspect of this plan that will allow for seniors who are no did living at the senior home to come to a day i was exist to learn about that practicum we have a lot of

seniors at home but sometimes become isolated at home and the more incidents to be in the community to be with other people to be engaged in various activities the healthier they'll be and good for the residents of the jewish home having people coming to spend the day it creates more of a beehive of activity and helps to keep everybody healthier this is a wonderful, wonderful project i sponsoring support it i move we forward items four and five to the full board of supervisors with a with a positive recommendation. >> supervisor kim and do you have a few remarks. >> just want to concur with what supervisor wiener said i'm happy to support that this is great to have a health write project to come before us and

everybody's support. >> thank you very much i too am looking forward to this project and colleagues there's a motion made that i want to specific that items four and five will be forwarded for a committee report and seeing no objection that item passes unanimously thank you. >> madam clerk call item 6. >> item 6 an urgency ordinance approving the interim for the storefront mergers greater than 4 hundred and 99 in the special use district for an additional 10 months and 15 days. >> thank you very much supervisor campos is the author of this item and his legislative aide hillary to make a short presentation. >> thank you very much today, the mayor and supervisor campos are asking you to extend the interim controls the board

passed that will prohibit of mergers that will result in a ground floor greater than 4 hundred and 989 square feet in the quatro special use district we're seeking an extension of 10 months and 15 days on saturday our windfall tax the economic & workforce development and the planning department host a community meeting on 24th street to begin to discuss the accept we expect to collect community feedback over 3 offices wall street with the mayor's office and the city attorney are in the process of drafting the sud we hope to have the proposal to introduce by the end of the year. >> and moiments the original needs for the interim controls and mergers remain many long term neighborhoods serving businesses in the cult district have been closed because of skoeth republicans and smaller

place you are more assessable to small businesses we hope you'll put in place rules the state law requires the interim controls be for 10 months and 15 days, however, the sud is adapted earlier then those recusal will supersede the interim controls if you have any questions i'm here as well as diego sanchez and i think we're i object to answer any questions. >> fair market value that is a great legislation and my colleagues don't have any questions i'll go ahead and open up for public comment any is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak public comment is open at this time. >> okay seeing none, public comment is closed colleagues i don't know if you have any last minute remarks okay there is a motion made by my supervisor wiener to move with a with a positive

recommendation. >> i didn't make that motion. >> excuse me. i'm sorry. >> is there a motion? >> anyone? >> is there a motion? >> all right. thank you very much let's take this with a roll call vote. >> on the motion to recommend item 6. >> supervisor kim supervisor wiener no supervisor cohen thank you. this motion that item passes. >> that's 2 i's with one no with supervisor wiener is december sent. >> thank you very much this item passes okay ladies and gentlemen, why don't we take up items 7 and 8. >> item 7 to present finding from the annual balance report and item 89 to receive and approve the first bio annual

report. >> supervisor kim is the authors supervisor kim anything you want to say new. >> thank you. i do want to thank chronicling and the committee for hearing this item today, i first of all, want to acknowledge the hard work the planning department i see our director john ram and many staff members that worked to collect that data since we passed the legislation in april of this year asking for data to have a better understanding of where the city is at in terms of hitting our goals of increasing the production of affordable housing but also where we were at in terms of loss of rental units housing in november of 2014 the voters approved a measure of prop k that said the city should set a goal of hitting 33 percent of affordable housing and 50 percent including madam clerk, any announcements? housing this

is not a mandate but a goal we would like to achieve in making sure that many of the san franciscans get to continue to live here and that we can have a difference workforce that can live in san francisco as well i want to recognize>> thank you. next speaker, please. >> eagle on from the controller's office presenting on citywide income projects i am happy to report in the data to help to understand the impacts to our city's housing stock with the affordable and market-rate that helps policymakers to make more informed policy decisions but shows where the impacts are you think what is most striking about the report we read it in july was that we coming into close to our affordable housing production at 28 percent over the last event 10 years but

we're hurt in the loss of rental units housing and to make sure we're acquiring existing housing stock is just as important as building and providing new affordable housing it is expected that certain districts will harbor more the development in san francisco than otherwise by virtue of the availability of lands or the approximate of transit but regardless of how much development in each district percentage wise all district should offer a positive housing balance the production of affordable units surpasses affordable housing lost to evictions or to unit being taken off the market unfortunately, the majority of our district here in the city have a negative balance ranging from negative one to negative hundred and 89 percent so we have a citywide 10 year

cumulative balance of 15 percent including large projects 20 percent and the balance includes permitted units on top of those that were built i am, of course, very excited to see we're building a lot of housing 62 percent being built in this district and complooib with with supervisor cohen districts it is far in the majority i'm glad to see where we are building the housing a lot of affordable housing and, in fact, district 6 is 44 percent of the new affordable housing i think that it demonstrates it we have development that the city has work hard to insure that affordable housing is a part of any development that is being built and specialist the presence the ellis act that allowed for no fault evictions the report does

reveal dramatically where those evictions occur in district 3 were less than 10 percent that has less than 10 percent of the construction that more than double no fault vibrations and district 8 more than triple when we look at where this is occurring the data is quite helpful in helping us understand where we want to target preservation collision so open up to community members if none open up to director ram. >> director ram. >> thank you, john ram with the planning department we're happy to be here to report on the first essentially the first housing balance i'm joined write teresa the author of the report she'll go into the

details and other colleagues and emry rogers from the planning department. >> so then i think you, we thank ted egan for juan you quickly to go over what the housing balance report is and assistant in april as you may know the board passed ordinance 531 an ordinance to the planning code that directs the department to reports on the balances of new market-rate and other heirs over a 10 year period the affordable units to the net unites over that period it requires this report bio annually and the report to be done right away the one done two months ago i believe now we're on a regular schedule to the report koimdz comes out in the spring we've discussed the fact

that the board will take action after the spring report is out so what is the housing balance target the goal to insure that the data is meeting the take the and informs the approval processes for new housing development 3 targets we looked in this report won the housing element it, of course, is mandated by the state to be upgraded period a goal of 28 thousand new funds i units within 2015 and the 2022 the rehousing allocation that goals percipients it 57 should be available to low and moderate hours the department sentiments a report to the department of housing. >> community development and prepare a report to the planning commission based on that goal

and the second target is prop k, of course, which was passed by voters last year that set a goal that 33 percent of new units be affordable that is the goal it the housing balance aims for and the third the mayors gallows of thirty thousand set by 2020 with the housing visible to low income and middle-income i'll say as supervisor kim pointed out where the parts of city that are seeing the most development are where we are achieving the affordability goals because the housing development helped to pay for that and the department is eagle seeing and need to work with mohcd and other agencies on stabilizing the housing and this is an important point in the

report kind of guiding us in the work with the mission street and hopefully other neighborhoods as we moving forward the stabilization, if you will, the neighborhoods roksz the senior development and the need to stabilize the rent-controlled unit how are you stockbroker with that, i'm going to turn it over to teresa to go over the details of the report thank you. >> good afternoon, supervisors. >> my name is teresa with senior planner with the citywide policy planning section i'll be presenting on the housing balance details as director wham ram mentioned the housing balance the portion of housing unit to the totals of new hournts over a 10 year housing balance period

what is the 10 year historical production trend. >> if we are to look at just new housing production and affordable units made up of 29.7 or thirty percent of the net new housing units built in the last 10 period we're talking about the third quarter of 2005 is to the 2015 this presentation is actually on the second report you've received the housing balance clacks looks at beyond the calculation and the housing balance calculations looked at the choigsz and rehabilitations made and rad and replacement completed rad stands for rental demonstration he essentially the

replacement of older public housing projects and entitled and permitted affordable units must units reformed from protected status sierra club the rental units are removed under ellis act or the demolition catalytic i have condominium conversion and other no fault evictions the housing stock is seen as as proposition for that netted new units built plus net new entitled and permitted units the figures are all for the 10 year reporting period. >> this presentation covers the second housing balance reports simply for the period we looked at net new oornz stock

totaled 4 nine hundred the net affordability shocker is 15 percent the cumulative city balance over the 10 year period the ordinance also requires that the housing balance be calculate for the brown's district and by planning department direction the slide shows the balances for the board of supervisors district and this range from negative hundred and 89 percent if district 4 to 40 percent in district 5 the negative balances are due to larger number of units removed from protected status relative to the net new affordable units in the howe new housing units builds overall district 5, 6 and 10 positive baltz 40, 25 and 20 percent

respect the rest of the negative balances. >> i'm sorry can you repeat that one more time you said district 5, 6 and 10. >> are positive housing balances. >> especially meaning we're building - and the affordable housing units built relative to the affordable housing units that are taken from the market they're more net units built relative to those. >> if i can say it more simply we're building more affordable housing than losing so districts 5, of and 10 are building more affordable housing than we're losing. >> thank you. >> this next slide shows the director of transportation by the pricilla chan district those districts by way of are consistent with the boundaries in the housing inadvertent

reports again those arrange of balance from negative hundred 25 percent to the right-of-way approximately the geography of the board of supervisors district 4 and about 39 in the western edition and in downtown. >> the ordinance also requires a projected housing balance sierra club net new affordable units as a proposition of the total new units in projects that have received entitlements and yet to receive the building permit. >> this slide shows the balance is 13 percent the - this prolonged housing balance is provided the board of supervisors district and planning department levels. >> so what is not included the

housing balance ordinance also specifics that 3 major projects have already been entitled but do not yet have building permits not included in the projected housing balance altogether those projects will provide about 23 thousand seven hundred net units of which 21 percent will be affordable not included in the projected housing balance are projects currently under review and rad projects that are slated to starts rehabilitation in a couple of months about 12 thousand nine hundred units goodwill review 40 percent are affordable units 70 market-rate projects are a total of 10 thousand 5 hundred

units subject to the inclusionary housing requirement at this time we do know how much they'll generate it depends on the option those projects take there are about 15 rad projects in phase one one thousand 4 hundred and 25 we have rrgs rehabilitation to start in december. >> what are the next steps the department sticks to the bilingual annual reporting schedule and stipulate the housing balance reports couples in the first of mark and september it was will conducted before the board of supervisors and before the first of april of mayor's office of housing and community development the

mayor's office of housing the rent board and the department of building inspection and the city visit will present strategies for maintaining a health balance with the city's affordable meeting in april should a cumulative balance fall blow with a determined amount of funding for the city to be in the 33 percent the planning department's will create and maintain a website specifically for the housing balance report as required by the ordinance i'm available to answer any questions. >> thank you very much for our thoughtful preservation i'd like to bring up mr. had a wood can you do us a favor and gives the highlight why this report is important and what are the key

points it's trying go to communicate. >> happy to sophie hayward from the mayor's office of housing and community development thank you for having us here today, the housing balance report is one way to track the city's voter approved dowel to achieve a housing balance as memoriam listed through the prop k we at mohcd are responsible for the code requirement after the issuance of the second report if april i'm here to do today so out a in broad strokes of the work of mohcd for chief of police the goals of prop k we're tracking 3 inputs to the formula formula that creates the housing balance and for us as the new affordable housing production managing our priming specifically, and, secondly, findings new funds and resources

and securing the resources to secure affordable housing and third managing or watching and doing our part for the loss of rent-controlled units so to that end in terms of new production mohcd current affordable housing pipeline projects the 3 thousand 5 hundred rehabbed affordable units by 2018 those will if i calculate takes the balance have to 26 percent i'll work with them online for the eligible accountability and in addition 3 thousand plus 2, 3, 4 predevelopment and that's part of our regular pipeline you've heard that from time to time by way of new funds i'd like to just take a few moments to highlight two new sources we know of and two potential source

of other than first around the sb 107 for 3 thousand units that previously have fallen into the category with no identified funding in addition, we have the new the states cap & trade regulations recently eliminated the $15 million jurisdictional cap in the first rounds the allocations it means in the future multi projects within san francisco, california apply each for up to $15 million in individual award from the cap & trade funding we hope that is expedites are production of affordable housing and by a way of the two potential source of revenue the ab two, that was passed at the state level we're

hoping that is favorable for san francisco we're not sure yet but provide you more information as we pull it together a number of criteria that are required in order to secure that funding but we're analyzing right now the city at various levels to see how that applies and, of course, the affordable housing bonds that railroad on the ballot this november and if this passes 4 hundred more rehabbed or new affordable units. >> loss of units is the third category i want to address this is challenging as a city and at mohcd in particular we don't have control over the loss of rental units p we have as a a city and continue to pursue efforts to slow evicts and the loss of those protected units at mohcd we'll continue to fund the

defense programs fully and then we'll hopefully as you are the tenants rights legislation will slough the loss of protected units we're making process in establishing the framework for on accelerator fund to focus on the collision of larger rent-controlled units buildings to remove the tenants and that if i understand will serve as a compliment to the small sites program that seeks to acquire smaller rent-controlled units. >> so as i said we'll provide our formal response in the spring i hope this gives us an approach how we looking at the balances and i'm available to answer any questions. >> thank you. we appreciate the - >> may i have. >> got a couple of questions for you. >> please.

chair cowen. >> i talked about ab 2 at the board and incredibly interested what the stating means in treasure island we included in the da a we're recent to use an increment to go up to other thirty percent that was the original goal of affordable housing on the island but i also understand that ab two allows us based on a set of criteria to use tax cements on sensitive blocks maybe less of a question more of an ask or a request that mohcd look at the all the eligible tracks in the works so we can have a map of where we might be able to use this tool in san francisco and, of course, i've requested that the treasure island department are authority to look at how to mohcd tracks

our affordability on treasure island and great to work with the mayor's office of housing as well. >> absolutely from when i understand this is our preliminary stages how we could potentially use our assess through ab 2 we need to start with the mapping the tracks that includes the tracks that are income eligible and work with on the vice presidents to layer in the data related to the other data. >> thank you. i'm glad that moh city as working on it is it a high bar given the fact they use the average medium income not san francisco i know your i'm is much higher than statewide hopefully, there will be sustained areas we can use is for, and, secondly, i'm glad to hear about the housing

accelerator a huge supporter of the fund and excited to purchase 534 and 6 and in the mayor's office of housing it is sometimes hard with you realize our only by 5 or 7 units at that time, and have large rent-controlled units buildings thought san francisco is it would be amazing to acquire and add those to the portfolio and make a dent in adding to the acquisition i'm looking forward to hearing about that and the strategies how we start our identify potential sites. >> thank you. >> supervisor wiener do you have any questions. >> i have not a question but a comment that is very helpful and you know showing there are way too many vibrations in san francisco i want to note in terms of the housing balance

when you look at the balance by district the supervisorial districts clearly the evictions radio a major factor in the significance of that balance we need intoxicate look at how many affordable units are being built for example in district 8 percent the district i represent that are too much evictions going on and also way too few affordable units being built and what we can see from this report is i think we all have known this that there are certain parts of city it are getting a lot of affordable units built and neighborhood where very little affordable units is being built i've had a lot of discusses with the mayor's office of housing and community development about the fact i'm via very, very happy a lot of affordable units is going in

district 6 that's he terrific and happy we're seeing a lot of affordable housing in district 10 but also need in district 8 and 9 example and 5 and 4 and all over the city right now we don't center geography graphic equality there are plenty of rebates why we're in this place the good thing that political shift everywhere we've surrendering seen around housing many parts of city want affordable housing so we need to reduce the number of evictions absolutely but as popular we have to significantly improve the process faster and proceed is it to more parts of city of we reduce the number of vibrations to zero we'll be in a housing crisis because of the lack of affordable housing. >> thank you very much.

>> thank you very much. >> okay. at this time, we'll take public comment on items 7 and 8. >> my name is francisco decost i think we really need to look at this issue very, very seriously with the imperial data so we really do not know when it comes to the figures thirty thousand units in this city. >> whether we have about three hundred and 84 thousand housing unit in total about our population if it is color to 8 hundred and 20

thousand and when the mayor talks about the thirty thousand units and some people take for granted they'll be units are going to be built in the southeast sector and you include the public housing they should be demolished if noted rehabbed anyone that is sensible tells me the infrastructure doesn't work the other thing we throw out the numbers be very, very careful not building in any area that is contaminated and going to liquefaction and flooding and not addressing quality of life ordinances you may think in district of a lot of affordable housing but do you all ask the people if their - if their suffering from asthma religious percent diseases i would like to remind that this is a lonely lands this is never mentioned

and mellone has the inadvertently some people think this is fine to build luxurious units on treasure island but they'll suffer from the elements - >> (inaudible). >> next speaker >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> please come to the mike. >> good afternoon. i'm a president of the richmond

community association and in regards to affordable housing it is a major, major issue as you may know in the city and there are many part inside the city that has not contribute and there's a good reason for that the worse part of city is built up and out we don't have the density as most other parrots of city now the new affordable housing density plan for example, has an effort to increase affordable housing and many areas of the city and in the richmond for example, you as you can see this house picture there are second story what is allowed in the affordable housing bonus plan as you may know to increase it stories above what it is

designed for . >> affordable housing is really important to many of us in the richmond district we live in the richmond district we like the reconcile of the district and going online you know about the next door well, i posted this issue about the affordable housing affordable housing bonus plan and it is interesting to see what kind of comments came up the people who are homeownership's are really concerned oh, my god what is going to happen we'll loss our backyard or open space and privacy and selfishly property values on the other hand, there are other young people who are not established don't have families they could careless they want housing now and some of them with making comments

don't to have a manhattan well unfortunately feel we don't have a manhattan transportation and it didn't meet the standards of department that is necessary so well, at the end the affordable bonus plan should be considered other than a case by case situation because otherwise there's will be a tremendous negative impact for some of the districts especially the richmond district and the richmond district 75 percent of blocks will have or could have an impact with this plan so i is one-size-fits-all thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker >> once the transit system in

chinatown in chinatown most of the well fixture for about most of the departments of housing low, low low income people affordable housing and those conditions so terminal just terrible conditions that requires maybe our we're not a working scheme but remodeling and more construction involved in the housing structures over chinatown. >> thank you are any is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak public comment is closed. is closed for item 7 and 8 thank you. >> this matter is in the hands of the committee i'd like to make a motion that item 7 be filed and that item 8 move forward to the full board. >> a i so moved on both of

those. >> thank you. >> can this motion pass with or without we'll take that without objection. >> okay we'll take that without objection. >> madam clerk any other items before i. >> no, that concludes our presentation today. >> madam clerk, any other business before this committee? >> this meeting is now adjourned thank you. >>

>> we are approving as many parks as we can, you have a value garden and not too many can claim that and you have an historic building that has been redone in a beautiful fashion and you have that beautiful outdoor ping-pong table and you have got the art commission involved and if you look at them, and we can particularly the gate as you came in, and that is extraordinary. and so these tiles, i am going to recommend that every park come and look at this park, because i think that the way that you have acknowledged donor iss really first class. >> it is nice to come and play

and we have been driving by for literally a year. >> it is kind of nice. >> all of the people that are here. ♪ historic preservation commission. >> good afternoon and welcome to the san francisco historic preservation commission regular hearing for wednesday october 21, 2015. i would like to remind members of the public that the commission doesn't tolerate disruption or out bursts of any kind. please silence all cell phones during the proceedings and when speaking before the commission state your name for the record. commissioner president wolfram. >> here.