Skip to main content

tv   TA Personnel Committee 11415  SFGTV  November 7, 2015 3:10pm-3:21pm PST

3:10 pm
>> good afternoon welcome to the san francisco transportation authority personnel committee meeting i'm supervisor wiener the chair of the committee to my right is supervisor katie tang your vice chair and to my left is madam
3:11 pm
chair rosales. >> mr. clerk, any announcements? >> >> the roll call is now done move to item 2. >> roll call. >> you want want to do roll call. >> commissioner avalos supervisor tang supervisor wiener. >> we have quorum okay. >> technical 2. >> approval of the minutes of december 2, 2014, an action item any, any changes to the minutes from almost a i don't know any public comment on item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed. and i guess call the roll >> commissioner avalos supervisor tang supervisor wiener the minutes are approved item 3. >> recommend a program ends york clarification and any clarifying two positions an
3:12 pm
action item. >> ms. wong deputy director for the finance administration in may 2014 you may recall this committee approved the staff reorientation for the staff capability with the existing workload issues and the session planning will at the time, we added 8 new position for the transportation authority from 4 three to four 1 hired 7 of the 8 positions we've been monitoring importantly the workload management for the practices that have viewed since the implementation of the enterprise system back in september 2015 that was system has been simplified a number of procedures in the agency would those two items in mind we'll seeing seeking to reclarify the
3:13 pm
transportation authority organization chart two senior engineer one in the policy and programming that is a senior engineer we'll to reclarify to a program analyst and a position within the senior position within the capital project to the program and reclarify that we have a job description on the attachment one for the program analyst and this program analyst will be working to support the analyticalic work and monitor and assist with data management and program managing we have a job description on the troichlt of the principle planner and we have a proposed organization chart we'll be reclarify the two senior to one program analyst
3:14 pm
and one in the program and policy decision and one principle planner in that position in terms in terms of cca this didn't go before them in terms of the the reclassification the engineer clarification to a program analyst will save 49 thousands $20 and the reclassification from the engineer to a transportation planner will have no cost savings no additional cost because the exact same similarly position with that, i'll be happy to answer any questions great. thank you very much colleagues, any questions or comments on item 3 seeing none, any public comment on item 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> and okay
3:15 pm
a motion to approve a second and ca colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order. >> for the selection job clarifications an action item. >> on to item 4 what i have before you is a rough salary survey by the cove and associates in december 2014 the commissioner avalos asked for a salary for the executive director that is in align with the salaries so for the entire agency so we've had a salary survey in f 2012, 2013 the last for the executive director was in fiscal year 2006 now koffman and associates we used for the last survey in 2013 they kept to the same medicine
3:16 pm
metrological to scare survey the positions and asked them to look at 15 positions because the other 9 portions were within the series of the 15 from that point the results indicate that from that point we identified which agencies to a compare the agencies to the alameda the contra costa transportation authority, the san francisco municipal transportation agency and the metropolitan and the santa clara valley and the san mateo transportation authority those are the 6 agencies we compared in terms of results 87 positions were blow the market medium, however, we are seeking a salary range income not the
3:17 pm
actual compensation increase for the position those will be provided at the time of the evaluation but seek an increase in 3 position those positions that are 9 percent below the market medium the executive director position or the senior engineer position and senior planner position i would like to and take our attention to attachment number one which has 3 different pages it is the salary survey data from cove and associates that indicates the 6 compare active agencies the different positions their compared to in the monthly salaries and the effective date of those increases the next promoted increase the next
3:18 pm
percentage of increase and were the transportation authority is grant number 5 for the executive director out of the various agencies and the bottom ranging for the senior engineer and senior planner position. >> the next item i'd like to show you is a comparative agency table you have a document on at our desks if we can put that on the screen for additional reference for this item a table put together listing 3 agencies and indicates the number of board members and staff the sales tax whether or not those agencies have a c m a a transit operators how much sales revenue
3:19 pm
for 2014-2015 and in addition how much expenditures for 2013-2014 and fiscal year 2013-2014 was the common data for all the agencies more so this item was put before you a frame of reference of agencies we're comparing them two. >> continuing on within the memo there is table one as i indicated we're only looking at increasing the sailors for positions blow the 9 percent of the market medium that those 3 positions we were walk through and one this is translating into 6 different positions at the transportation authority because of the series we have an engineering series a principle engineer and senior
3:20 pm
engineer a planner transportation planner that starts off with a principle and a senior transportation planner and senior planner and then in terms of the cca the item didn't go before the cca in terms of fiscal impact those are only the salary and the increases are made at the staff preference performances evaluation with that, he shouldn't this is a lot of data to absorb we're looking to propose the increases in table one table with an the proposed increases for the position that the transportation authority this represents 6 positions out of 024. >> okay thank you very