development is a diverse community they're now part of that we're asking you if you can delay and include other neighborhoods and the represents from the planning commission they ask no for the political supervisorial district but the neighborhood to make that happen and maybe if we have more time we can decide that the bayview needs more 40 percent but let's have the time and the this will have an impact in the community for the grassroots is happening in the mission and the bayview it is all over the city and take the time to address that you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> yes. good afternoon supervisor president london breed you can supervisor cowen supervisor wiener and supervisor kim

my name is dr. verna honeycutt a long time residents in san francisco i have i'm a retired educator and administrator if various institutions and a member of the cpa shipyard it is good to see you i want to be be succinct heave heard the various arguments so which make sense and others do what we don't need to have done we need and need an increase from 25 to 40 percent for all the reasons you've heard neighborhoods to be defined by supervisorial district to insure we're not including any eligible participants in the program number 3 studying neighborhood

preferences for years this is two important an issue to delay people are being displaced people will have not feasibility other than to leave san francisco they don't have the resources to make that possible for them to remain in san francisco it is just simple please move forward this forward observing it will take time because of ramifications over time and make those adjustments over time move that forward thank you very much. >> next speaker >> hello board of supervisors i'm michelle a super bowl 50 in the bayview district and the associates the real estate on third street i was one of the sales brokers that worked on the development

and at armstrong a low to moderate housing along with the development on mission block that we completely in 2012 i'm here because we had such a small percentage of the population of the original population of bay area i want to see that change if 25 to 40 percent i think if we had the opportunity to get all of our buyers and everything together we'll definitely see an increase in f this development not see the same thing happen as armstrong but a fair chance was not given i wanted to see it go from 25 to 40 percent thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> thank you, supervisors my name is jackie wrought a

resident in san francisco and i also i am an elderly over 60 years old and have piloted different times to senior housing i'm not been able to get in it is urban justify my father died in vietnam fighting for this country i can't get into any of the housing that i should be able to get into what their foreigners that get into this country and easily get into it, it is an enjustice in the advisory committee of the fact i've worked inform the american red cross and the san francisco execute and working for microfilm and working with the nonprofit groups so with me being a hard worker and being also an elderly with me brown-bag an officer several areas that san francisco has mad projects promises to and i'll

not fitting in i think the 40 percent is the minimum i think that should be his or her and probably 100 percent until some pain and suffering that can be done concerning charge was done especially the african-american community where businesses and homes have been december made by policies and once again i think that is important that the policies that you put in place now will make a difference so 40 percent definitely thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> good afternoon. i'm from the mission collaborative i'm here to call for a continuance and shift the district the current district to the neighborhood preference as the person before me said the current policy is unfair and unjust no disagreement on that,

however, we must not fight each other our communities are december 345i9d i was born and raised in the tenderloin i want to the same school as the president most of my friends were born and raised who grew up here don't live here in place for them this is why you know none it saying we shouldn't increase the population 25 percent is okay people are saying 40 percent is good but perhaps it should be for more and san francisco is a city of neighborhoods it is not a city it is a city i have district only politically each district has various neighborhoods if here and this legislation is needed and it is for the timing of this is that i haveal, however, a continuance is not going to change the reality obvious being for detailed on the legislation is

not going to end up displacing more people st. mary's there are not hundreds of affordable housing onto the math in the next few months making sure we do that is important, however, making making sure we do this correctly with each neighborhood need being address is important pivotal to make sure the city remains a city of diverse neighborhoods thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> bayview hunters point and multi purposing simplest and a long time residents of bay area the time is now we've already missed the boat and behind that the eight ball 40 percent now is a good start in the right direction for something we're

already behind the eight ball on where it is neighborhood and we work with in our districts to get to a neighborhood preference but 40 percent now is better than still waiting and waiting and waiting how many years 1960 to 1970 the redevelopment and how many years for the ellis act if we don't act now people will be displaced and thousands of unit in the wings waiting on a legislation the time is now to act and then we'll still go back to the draugd at the attention of everyone i praise the board for looking at this issue and also commend you in advance for making that happen thank you. >> thank you very much is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak please come

on up or after this speaker we'll close public comment. >> we need to do the 40 percent and grater the certifies 22 percent have been used. >> thank you, very much. such ms. hallway kidnaps that's public comment thank you very much and supervisor president london breed has a few remarks and as well as i and supervisor wiener. >> thank you every members of the public that came out and start by saying ms. not perfect legislation there have been times this board of supervisors has passed legislation and we've gone back and made chances and made that better we're far behind in this neighborhood preference and as or as far as i am concerned we can't continue to delay delay means denial to those folks that are still trying to hold on to living in

san francisco and just to be clear i'm completely happy with the supervisorial district i know that the western edition is not the same as the inner sunset i understand that there are a lot of unique neighborhoods all over san francisco and people are proud of their neighborhoods they're proud of their city and want to to be able to have a place at the table as i said earlier today rosa parks is about to open is one of those places that the neighborhood is asking for preference people in the western edition community they want access to those units yes. i realize we're talking about supervisorial district which are larger than the neighborhoods again with no neighborhood preference the possibility of those residents having even access to those units is almost visually impossible and so i

don't support a delay i support moving forward i support not only moving forward but looking at it and analyzing it and possible making more changes to it in the future i want to say i had an opportunity because housing is one of the most important thing to the board of supervisors i visited new york and homes in new york i talked to housing advocates and folks in new york who gave me a area full of information the fact that as far back as they remember and document they've been doing neighborhood preferences since the late 1970s in new york and housing advocates and elected leaders have known that and have chosen to pretend like neighborhood

preference never existing we couldn't do it because of laws it makes me more upset and determined to move this forward as soon as possible yes, we can work with anyone in trying to make that legislation better but the time to move that existing legislation at the table not perfect is now more specifically i want to address the issue around the lawsuit that folks have talked about in new york i had a had an to talk with the hud secretary and i understand along with supervisor cowen to meet with leader pelosi and talk about the things happening in san francisco in clarion to what is happening in new york two different things they haven't had a lawsuit for what we're dealing with in terms of displacement of members of the community the lawsuit in new york specifically was around

folks feeling like they had been left out of the process it is a different thing than what we're trying to propose here they understand that there is is a real problem, no san francisco especially leader pelosi who basically, had that communication digital with the secretary in front of me at a public housing development that said look we have to do something different lost too many people in the community and need our support with that legislation we're taking a chance of federal funding we take a chance oftentimes with all kinds of pieces of legislation if in particular case we need to move forward and make that better i think that it is important we continue mayor's office of housing has continued to work with hud and continued to work with leader pelosi and other elected leaders on the federal level we don't perceive

significant amounts of money we'll still work with those leaders and those folks to basically get as much money on the table to build faster we deserve this preference yesterday and i think it is important to move forward to get it passed and to continue to work with these who are part of the decision-making process in order to make it better legislation the time is now i ask my colleagues no more details let's get this legislation moved something is better than nothing at all it is happening for far too long from the city thank you. >> (clapping.) thank you. >> supervisor wiener. >> thank you, madam chair and thank you to everyone that came out on both sides of the issue i know that affordable housing also brings out strong views

from all of us. it should be that way it is the positive important issue facing the city i think we should move forward today and i think we should send a strong message that neighborhood preference legislation is incredibly important in terms of moving affordable housing policy forward as supervisor president london breed indicated other cities have been doing this for a long time it is way past due it is time sensitive we're having more and more affordable housing coming online in san francisco and the last thing to do it delay this legislation so that we continue to have zero neighborhood preference so that's the status quo zero and this delay keeps it at zero we continue to not have any kind of structure to make sure that people who live in neighborhoods have a fair shot

of getting into affordable housing built in that community i do want to correct i i know there was and a i miss statement from the cal community organization this is a live with work neighborhood preference that is not true not about work not the case that anyone works in district 6 will have the same apprehensive is inadequate that about are people live and not purely about supervisorial the other aspect the supervisorial plus the half of mile buffer around the location of the affordable housing project that is precisely indicated to make

sure that the surrounding neighborhood at the edge of the supervisorial is included that is important to me i pushed for this when the legislation was being drafted precisely for example, the 55 laguna project is at the border of district 8 and district 5 and as noted before lgbt seniors for example, don't just live in district 8 but other places even there is a concentration in district 8 i think we need to take into account in terms of flexibility around supervisorial district but i want to take issue with the notion that supervisorial district are somehow on inappropriate shot at getting into affordable housing in the neighborhood kwh we know when supervisorial district at the election and been that way that supervisorial districts are intentionally designed to keep community of interest together and we can see that from the way they're drawn yes those are political boundary by boundary that were dawn in order to keep

community of interest intact and to make sure that communities have representation on the board of supervisors so it is not the case that somehow purple heart political and inappropriate to use supervisorial district that is a decent proxy for the factor in drawing overseeing districts colleagues this is time sensitive i'll continue to support in legislation i move we forward item one the neighborhood preference legislation to the full board of supervisors with positive recommendations. >> all right. thank you very much before we take that motion let's hear from supervisor kim. >> thank you chair cowen. >> just wanted to make a couple of comments i had a lot of questions about this organization last week and thank you to the mayor's office of housing and authors of this legislation working with our office to answer many of them

i overall support of concept of the neighborhood preference i understand why so many community members wanted to see this this is frustrating to see the affordable housing built in our neighborhood and feel that that may not be housing for you this is important to allow that to occur i'm not confident this legislation whether address that in its form i support moving forward so we can begin the process of what works in terms of getting our neighborhood residents into the housing i certainly know in the district i represent that our residents need to win housing in the district and do so this is a state of the art i want to say around neighborhoods we should look at a mix of different concepts that for certain parts may work better anymore tailored in assuring that neighborhoods

get the avenue, i have to say in the district i represent he perch a preference in the tenderloin and south of market i want our residents to get apprehensive for this project i don't think our district is that big and want our residents to try to be able to qualify more affordable housing in the district as well we're not certain how the development will go in terms of the timeline and financing so i'll be supporting this out of committee today, i want to you say i want to working closely with the stakeholders in terms of redefining this legislation hopefully over the next couple of weeks with the authors that are here today and hopefully, we'll continue to find the legislation not to months to come or a year when we evaluate this but much sooner so thank you, again to everyone that is involved that is an important

discussion and glad we're now supporting the policy implementation to make that a reality. >> thank you, supervisor kim we appreciate your support in moving that item out of committee ladies and gentlemen, i just want to take a moment and recognize the mayor's office of housing that have put their time and energy what you see today, the culmination of frankly a few years worth of work and due diligence from the departmental level oftentimes miss framed when an item is in the planning commission and comes to the board we're rushing there this although we've been working on this for a very long time and the members of the public that have been advocating through black lives matter that same spirit of urgency and the desperation wear crying and bringing this legislation surfaced to address with

immediacy the current crisis that is at hand i know this city gets things done in a smart and good way i want to see this board move with the urgency as the lgbt community remember 10 years ago the same sex marriages were not considered legal and, yes, that was challenged and it started here in san francisco. why should we not be at the forefront or affordable housing it issue in san francisco is not unique there are major urban cities that are addressing similar challenges and we've done our due diligence met about leader pelosi's and castro street and the mayor's office of housing and with the legal advisors and that didn't 3450e7b be that the meetings stop it means they continue to go

forward to continue to forward the beautiful thing about legislation it is fluid if we don't get it right we'll come back back to the table and advocate for it there are real legal constraints please, please trust us and said that 100 percent more certainly sounds nice not feasible and i sure that you that 40 percent is aggressive i want to correct the record there are thousands of units that have already gone to market and thousands of unit that are keyed up and more tens of thousands in the future we must address this right now if it is urgent or we'll pies it and we can't because the people that have been pushed out of the city the urgency and immediacy of our attention so madam clerk there is a motion that

supervisor wiener made and let's do 0 roll call vote please. >> on the motion with a positive recommendation member kim pursue supervisor wiener supervisor cowen and madam chair, i have 3 i's. >> ladies and gentlemen, this motion passes unanimously (clapping.) >> all right. let's transition to the chamber as soon as possible we have an aggressive agenda for the land use commission we've got to get started for items 1 through 4 please leave the chamber quickly and quietly. >> all right. madam clerk call

items 2, 3, 4 together. >> item 2, 3, 4 are ordinances amending the general plan planning code and zoning map for the fifth and mission inform reclassify the height and unbelievable with the 5 m leonardo da vinci for the fifth and mission project. >> thank you very much all right. ladies and gentlemen, we're going to hear opening statement from supervisor kim and then we'll have a short staff presentation from the mayor's office. >> thank you chair cowen. >> earlier this year up worked with the giants to establish 40 percent affordability for housing on public school land we're setting a new standards 40 is the new 40 whether your building on public and now day public lands i've been a proponent of the growth and development in san francisco we have to insure we're building for san franciscans when the majority of san franciscans

qualify more affordable housing 60 percent of our residents qualify more affordable housing it is who we should be building for we're building more affordable housing not just luxurious housing i've heard incredible frustration into san franciscans is it are excited about the housing being built but in particular my district then when the unit came online we were sdointd they unity forward to rent or buy i'm proud tocy say is forest city is going to build 40 percent as part of the 5 m the first project to make that k30i7b8d commitment and 200 and 41 affordable and middle-income housing this is the previously negotiated 71 units of sfrntsz a project which has been los angeles gish approved in 2009 but lack of

fund to move forward for many, many years this one and 3 unit of single-family units is shovel ready and 5 m will provide the funds need to insure that project move forward and excited to announce that thirty of the units dedicated to formally homeless familiarize as many of you may know families are part of homeless population in san francisco and throughout the nation and like cities of new york and la to make sure we are building housing for the demographic this project will sure 83 units of senior at 967 mission land owned by the project sponsor they'll deed the land to the city and make sure all the construction dollars to build this project and finally i know i annunciations an increase of obesity affordable units to 87 which will be permanently

affordable each union will be dedicated to the households and 17 unit dedicated making one percent of afternoon medium income and thirty percent of average medium and 35 anothers one hundred 50 percent of ami and assurance there will be 2 bedroom unit at each income bracket the afternoon medium income covers a broad range if homeless families to restaurant hotels and other industries to nonprofit workers that are displaced from the neighborhood to t-shirts and nurses and middle-income office irks i've heard from hospitality house they're reaching an emergency point not gus because of budget cuts the workers are leaving their locate jobs they can't

afford to live here and moving so far away not just to oakland but so much farther couldn't commute to san francisco to give an example who we're building for i want to give a number so people understand for households of 3 for two parents and one child we're building housing for those households that are marking 45 thousand blue to 9 one thousand plus to one and $10,000 up to one and thirty thousand what is 12r50er8d we live in a city where their high wage earners cannot afford to live in san francisco it is important probation officer build a wide range of housing san francisco has deny a december sent job but a dismal for middle-income i'm proud those projects 5 m will be committing to assuring for a

board range of families in san francisco i want to acknowledge for a city and first corporation to reach this deal and, in fact, i should add the project sponsor was eager to get to 40 percent and didn't fight us on it we're spending a lot of time on the details but working hard to insure there was a range of income bracket for eligibility for the 5m not just the highest income that would have been eligibility as affordable and appreciate their commitment one the sud that comments the deal committing to building 2 bedrooms at the middle-income bracket and thank you to the mayor's office of housing and workforce development and in particular ken rich and ann who insured before this project came before the planning commission the development included 33 percent of affordable housing as the mayor and my office have put

forward to the voters in praukz last oversight and getting us to the goal from the get-go eased the negotiations over the last month to make sure we got to 40 the 5 m site with the large footprint and collection of historic and non-historic structures presented e presents a unique opportunity for the it downtown public transit that brings me to 5 m next commitment cutting one half the parking ratio for the rental buildings and the residential offices in line with the transit first policy that makes the concept a reality by building the project next to transit that reduces the number of car spots and 24 helps the neighborhoods we want developments that are in alignment with our goals of residents and workers that have

safer modes of transportation including walking and biking and public permitting transit and healthy car and bike sharing i'll be making an amendment reducing the total number of parking spaces or approximately, one and 32 from 4 hundred to less this is an important element in supporting vision zero and sherry that streets in the south of market prioritize the cyclists and transit riders hitting the 5.2 parking ratio i'm sorry in the rental housing unit is a strong commitment to insure we have more residents not career drivers in the neighborhood finally as the mayor's office of housing e mayor's office of housing and community development will be presented there is a myriad of public benefits that serves our

organization youth and family organization through open space and community organizations and south of market only public school betsey carmichael k through 8 and along with the filipino cultural district and the old mint because there will be a lengthier presentation i'll not glow this i'll be submitting a series of amendments at the end of the hearing codifying the demonstration in the sud this insures that the critical benefits described are tied completely to the rezoning the site i site this insures along with the new zoning controls the south of market is insured a benefit like front loading the affordable housing fees so mary ann taylor can be built and building that contribute the contribution of the dumpster building to the affordable

nonprofit art space and new open space and public safety and transportation improvements i'll add that 5 m has committed to change the exciting tdif and paying 50 percent for the residential building insuring their commitment to our capital improvement for the transit improvements throughout the city so with no further comments i'm going to turn it over to i believe to decorate john ram and the mayor's office of housing and community development but supervisor wiener has some comments. >> thank you briefing bra the staff report first of all, congratulate the project sponsor in and the city and communities for the increases in affordability and prairie for having affordable housing program that has a great mix of

low income moderate income and low income a major win to be moving in the right direction and particularly it was a few years ago that it was considered controversial at the board of supervisors to even talk about moderate or middle-income housing we had housing advocates who were telling us we shouldn't be talking about middle-income housing and had a debate where some of my colleagues contend wyoming and sro percent of ami low income housing should not be called middle-income that was above mediator income housing a ask him i wish to talk about middle-income housing and the fact over a few years later we're 92 not just talking about

middle-income but delivering middle-income housing it as tremendous step forward a big policy in san francisco but i also want to note i think another groundbreaking aspect of this project which is that this project will be paying full freight when it comes to transit inch development fees at the level the sustainability fee that is not the case in the past in fact, of course, last tuesday passed the transit sustainability fee for the first time every will require in the future that residential development actually pay transit fees for the last 35 years also a development agreement and an agreement no requirement for any transportation fee related fees

this projectile would not have had to pay full transit sustainability fees because it is up for approval and the tsf will not go into effect for some time this is very important and in fact, i early on i had conversation with the developers and with city staff to make clear that project absolutely needs to pay full twrit sustainability fee a series in the south of market area and 40 of mission project they were not paying any transit impact fees i sat down with the city staff maybe a year and a half or two years ago i said it was going to be very, very hard for me to support any projects that don't

pay their transit impact fees i want to thank the aide staff for taking this seriously and bringing forward 24 it is paying it's impact fees and thank you totes developer for alleging to that that is a step forward i think this sets a great tune going forward to make sure our projects in the city is paying into 24 fund we know that any kinds of housing creates transit impacts and make sure that public transportation as well as access to pedestrians and cyclists all keeps up with the development in the city so with that, supervisor kim i think this will go through the economic & workforce development. >> it is john ram and i should notes and appreciate over comments on the middle-income housing this project is commit to building 32 percent of madam

clerk, any announcements? >> that is on top of that there is still hitting the praukz commitment to make sure that the 1/3rd is reasonable for the population and knitting to the 37 percent what we considered any other city higher middle-income households because of the crisis we're currently, we have in san francisco we need to be building subsidize units for this class and should mention that you know as we talk about years past in years past controversial to get the developers to build 15 percent affordable housing onsite we've come a long way to get to 40 percent is really been a heartwarming thing to get the developers to make sure we are building housing with half the units are for residents here in

san francisco thank you director ram. >> thank you good morning, supervisors john ram with the planning department supervisor 40 is the now thirty having turned 60 that maybe that's the new 50 when it applies to age i'm there with you there is a number of speeches that want to speak you'll not go over the details but want to talk about why the staff and the planning commission support this in the form it was in when the commission saw it weeks ago as many of you may know one of the unique elements 40 percent in legal ownership that is unusual for this part of town and the proposed project is 1.7 million square feet and specifically open space at ground floor and on the roof of the chronicle building a number of public

benefits, of course, embedded in the agreement you'll hear if oewd i'm not going 0 into the details but significant friendly contributions and other benefits that the project is proposed most important my comments today given the size and scope of that with the planning commission why would they support it i want to other people that there are a number of members the community that have's people to us we're very concerned about changing the zoning to allow the projects of this size we don't consider that a signal task changing the cladding in the downtown we've don't do often i want to other than this their concerns and talk about where why we think that is important and necessary and in fact, desirable a project first i've mentioned earlier the site is consistent of larger

unutilized parking lot in single ownership of 4 acres that is lou gehrig's disease u allowing us to master plan for a site of this size and it allows greater flexibility in the arrangement of buildings and allows us to amazed open space in quantities more useful and pub assessable secondly, we believe that is compatible with the surrounding building form the emergency hotel is across the street it is nearly 4 hundred feet in its form and it actually allows us to amazed the buildings near 15th it is aligned with building of compatible size and height and third close to transit a block if the station for bart and muni and the central subway station as well of the foyer stations on market street is not one that is having capacity like

the capacity for further growth and fourthly this site is a contribution on the edge of the western edge of downtown and designated most of site designated as c-3 by represents the western ends and the arrangement of buildings on the sightly and the location of open space and the adjacency of lower historic building to the west helps guarantee the buildings of this size will not continue to the west until we get closer to van ness and fifthly it contains affordable housing and supervisor kim mention now 40 percent and that through a combination of oust land dedication and offsite in a quarter of a mile and next the project does have very detailed design guidelines that will be adopted as part of our package the d-4-d

incorporated a high scrutiny and you'll get in projects of this downtown and allows us to make sure the design excellence is maintained the public benefits you'll hear in a moment are will exceed under current zion and the under current zoning we're po to pay attention to the telephone pens onsite it is important to recognize the change in the stone and the increased density allows us to increase the affordable housing numbers on the site next item i want to mention in relationship to the central selma the project predates the work on the central selma but absolutely supports the goals and includes transit orientation and development impacts fees and

in kind improvements o improvements it is consistent with the dowels of that plan and there is very little consistency within to those documents obviously the project adds office and retail space for the employment because of the city and boosters the downtown and a moment when the office building is reaching the capacity and the open space will provide is a very steven open space and there are large enough spaces and available to both yours of the project itself so for those reasons the planning department's and planning department staff has supported that project and the commission voted recently to do that i'd like to introduce kevin the project manager and pub thank kevin he's no longer with the department but as alleged to

come back and make his as you thank you during that time i'm kevin guy good morning the in a nut shell are the legislative components associated with the project this the general plan and the planning code and the development agreement that are necessary to complement the 5m project for a brief recap demolishes existing buildings and remain 3 existing buildings and four construction 3 new building inspections with roof from 250 to have hundred feet 6 hundred plus 8 hundred thousand square feet and 68 thousands of ground floor retails and sf moma and bike parking and public improvements and pub available office space for incorrectlyly in 2013 a series of mercy

housing we are held to solicit comments and provide informational updates on the status of the projects evolution on september 17th of this year, the planning commission and the rec and park held a joint hearing for the supplement at that hearing the planning commission safeguards the eir and proud of the office logos and the office allocation and approved an office design and recommended the approval the legislative action before the committee today and the rec and park department also took action for raise this shadow in the parks and determined the shadows on that park will not be adverse to the use of the space on october 19th a petition was filled the the office allocations for the project those are phenomenon o on calendar to be considered by the

full board of supervisors next thunders or thursday the mravrgs made recommended changes to the project wfrptd to the special use and is zone map i'll summarize those recommended change the first to amend the language to clarify the active use and the cultural used for the historic building and the h1 on howard street the amendments will have clerical changes with the zoning maps and add conditional use authorization for the use of identifying the conditional use in the selma and family sud except rations are not required to seek the conditional uses within the proposed sud there will be reminder for the kwufbs for the retail use and the individual buildings with residential uses meet the 40 percent to bedroom or 3 bedroom

requirements the commission recommended several changes to the promoted development that will require the payment of $300,000 for the adoption of filipino cultural heritage district, require that the planning department issue a periodic analysis of the displacement around the project and recommend the board offers a stable fund to prevent and the displacement and remind for the small site acquisitions and finally the sponsor continue to equip the incorporation of the child facilities that concludes my presentation. laura will presents an overview and the overview site and design principles for the project thank you. >> thank you very much i think we have a presentation?

>> hello, i'm laura with the site lab let's see. >> the slide. >> ohoh - there we go. >> thank you. >> so this project was begun in 2008, and i've been fortunate enough to work on it since 2009 in that time we've had one hundred 86 community meetings and tours the first community meeting started in 2009 and the first time that is masking and design was a shop to the public in 2011 just in advance of filing the e e a it's been a collaborative process with the stay planning department and the mta and the office of economic workforce development as well as the stakeholders we've spent 78

years understanding what can happen on the site and meet all the goals with the stakeholders and i would say through the iterations of seven years the item before you they have been four focused areas that create a phenomenal open space that really nufl and prioritizing the alleyways of the transit location through a balance mixed use program. >> as john mentions it is a really unique site particularly in this kind of location of downtown it is four acres with half that serve as parking lot no residential units and retails one small could have shop in terms of the context and the future of this part of san francisco it facilitates e fits into the overall city plans the

height peeking with the transbay tore and tapering down this project in and of itself creates part of the transition if the downtown to anymore western selma we imploded into the project that transition we literally will i he devout half the site to the new construction this site is also interesting in that is it is location of converge of many different neighborhoods and area plans this means that this project it needs to perform to align with those goals and embody it's roles at a crossroads that is part of what drove the project from the financing we looked at what it means to develop a project that used the downtown

femur forum and the surrounding context to the west so the variety and grain and mixed use and as you can see immediately around the city of the continental hotel and the streets. >> in terms of the explaining we gun into the mission street coordinator and their embedded with the historic buildings they seem to fade-out and not as much open space we were interested to build off of that around the old mint specifically we first started with the society to protect the chronicle building and protect the alley pattern and build off the chronicle building and the old mint and create actions that turn the alleyways into pedestrian

assessable areas with the public realm surrounding those historic buildings to create that network of open spaces through the site then when it comes to shaping them to the site there are a couple of drivers first from the unprospective we wanted to locate the largest buildings vanity to the largely street 6th street and howard street the site allows a contribution from the downtown to the western selma scale at the same time, we also were managing and refinancing to make sure that we were responding to all the climate conditions and improving wind conditions in the area and maximizing the daylight on the open spaces we came to the proposal that was analyzed in the eir that you see here

as a result we got quite a bit of feedback through the strerldz including groups like hi co-and that we heard a consistent threesome the desire for the element in ceqa and less density and space we studied the different ways to respond to this we look at option that reduced height and options that removed the city building in the end that reflect what is the revised project as you can see the middle building is removed allowing us to maintain the line of the historic building and double the. >> (speaking chinese.) on the ground there is an emphasis on the ground and is connections between the public elevator that will be at to the chronicle building and the access to the rooftop added to the project since that time was also the emphasis on

affordable housing in particular being able to dedicate a parcel that is two doors down for senior hours and that's been established for the development through the mayor's office of housing. >> so as i mentioned the site is 50 over 50 percent down zone, if you will, to basically store which the open space and to map to the historic building so that those are guaranteed to be retained and up zoned for the new building but creating the public realm is not just about the open space but the evergreen for the d-4-d john mentioned we have a number of controllers beyond what is standard in the planning code around the building empties and the storefront design as well as the uses that were mentioned altogether then they create a

system that feeds the alleyway and the circulation and the perimeters streets and part of city's worked with cast the nonprofit the arts strabltion to steward the malcolm heinicke in a in a dumpster building a place for nonprofits to be used for the open spaces as a platform sblgz the building in its current state and here you see that believe and the open space as we envision it how this project comes together where the mission street residential reflect the ideas of text it is your articulation and this is something the details is in the d-4-d added to the project as well as the pedestrians only north part that links with the pedestrian from mission street

into the central open space and natoma that seen improvements in the craft of new and old with the residential buildings the hi rise the residential that framed the chronicle tower and the increased articulation as well as the city and reconciling i'm sorry the city and project reconciling here the new buildings with the enter continental from potrero and from seep i 80 looking at if downtown and particularly this project as part of sud and a 4 acre planning effort was able to bridge the downtown form to the bridging down to the lower rise of the context. >> so i'll leave you with those 4 principles and i'm available to answer any questions thank you. i'll hand

it over to ann. >> thank you. >> good afternoon madam chair and anybody's i'll the project sponsor in the department of workforce development i'll walk through as proved by the planning commission on october 17th in the 6 weeks intentions or since the new york city the city has evolved as recommendations with other city commissions and ongoing advocacy input and further negotiation with those boards and members the committees. >> we're aware the planning commission generated a feedback for the past 6 weeks forking for the family to consider the

recommendation and identify opportunities and more or less importantly worked collaboratively to extend our partnership thank you to the forest city and work with the city for a robust package to the committee the development is a legally biden contract between the city and developer for the term of da which in this case is 15 years they'll negotiate the physical and financial benefits that the developer will not otherwise be required to meet once the board of supervisors hsa have greeted telling then - the 5 m protector, llc should sell one or more the parcels all the entitlements conditions and controls and obligates run with the lands any developer taking on the ownership take on the physical and benefits

responsibility and obligations of the approved project if more any reason the 5m, llc or another developer that takes control of the site and want to make adjustment for the agreement they'll be required to reappear in front of the planning commission followed by the board of supervisors to ask for changes in terms of any changes to the development the d-4-d or sud that are not consistent with the approved project will be required to start the process over in your packet exhibit d provides a breakdown of the developers responsibility by building each building will pay all the impact fees and the additional negotiable benefit fees the project will generate a total of $73 million plus in developer fees and benefits that

will be transcribed to the mint the betsey carmichael school are department of workforce development and on top of those payments do not the dubbing dumpster building for the arts areas culture spaces because the project is located on land that is 100 percent privately owned and the costs are 100 percent privately funded we need to identify the structure in order to properly associate the benefits required for the site we looked for the transit district plan it generated the fees for the high-rise structures that pie cart illustrates this basically structure the fees plus transit overlays yield the benefits we took the 64 pies employed represented in blue and added the purple conditioner that is

the district fees we combined the contribution and disabled to though the public benefits program lubltd by the green pie in light of the current housing situations the project was to jade as much housing as soon as possible it was the first to achieve the take the by generating affordable housing within the housing site as supervisor kim outlined we've captured it to achieve 40 percent to total 200 plus through a combination of 34 housing elements first, the developer will provide $18 million for the gap from eddy family housing project the tndc will produce formally homeless families to 40 percent ami it will be transcribed from

the project site secondly, the project a will decade a parcel of lands with $25 million for 83 permanently affordable units a comply with the housing program and finally, the m-2 rental building was an 40 plus affordable unit has evolved and largely 0 due do supervisor kim and on the members of the boards as a result as outlined by supervisor kim we have an m two building with a total of 87 below-market-rate and it will achieve the building percent for affordability. >> in addition to the 1 that is $4 million fee obligations the park funds the project sponsor will include the 26

showing us thousand succeeded for parks and the chronicle building 37 thousand square feet is a the code requirement a major contribution to the arts and nonprofit office space is the developers demolition of the democrat stare building to the trust the democrat stare is an historic resource in the open space 60 percent of the one percent arts contribution that will be distributed through the cast per capital to roommate the building the remaining 40 percent for public art and culture projects throughout the 5 m in addition to the $5 million plus 5 m will make a contribution of $6,000 to be used used for the nonprofit and distributed through a process the consideration when be given to the development active

nonprofit culture institutions in the area including the high-risk and/or damaged populations and provide issues in the selma area. >> the program generates one $.5 million for the office of economic workforce development those will be used for specialized training for the construction jobs and land users $400,000 is targeted to provide the funds for the individual that are formally or currently homeless the project sponsor will participate in the city's fir hiring program and the lgbt program and finally, the project will generate telling hundred construction jobs and other full-time jobs. >> $3.5 million of the 6.8 is above the baseline combeekz their divide into the contribution to rec and park to

kickoff the fundraiser for the recreation center and one million dollars contribution for the betsey carmichael school to be used for off-street parking and faculty training and recommend and the remain $1.5 million will be expansion for the stabilization and technical assistance for the youth and family within the selma neighborhood the total transportation transportation obligation for the project is $12.2 million we've broktd into two buckets 8.8 is the existing infrastructure or i do tdif it is applied to the desegregation and the $3.4 million the tsp represented the dollars the developer will be obligated to pay if the tdif is not implement supervisor wiener made that clear we'll not support the new

tdif the 3 housing unit $4 million will be used two mta to have bicycle and other improvements for a crosswalk with the 5m open space and priority that will addressing the pedestrian safety and public safety adjacent to the project site part of vision zero sf. >> the project sponsor will also mania robust transportatma king program with one million dollars program used for due diligence and the long term restoration for the schematic restoration of the building we've been asked to explain how 5 m aligns with the central selma in benefits and fees our office working closely with the planning department to track the process and to sure that 5 m is on target the central selma plan

seeks to provide public benefits and 5 m under the development agreement is able to achieve all the take the and be affordability for all the other take the benefits including the affordable open space over one acre new and others buildings. >> the central selma anticipates 22 that is 5 square feet throughout the district and planning is setting a number of tools for $3 billion for the revenues that workout to $89 in public benefits for every square feet those benefits will be achieved over a 25 year period when you apply the central selma methodist 5 m veeldz and we're

able to serve the immediate areas and address the affordable housing needs in the very near future finally we want to drawing your attention to the timing of the distribution in norwalk that the critical need more affordable housing as soon as possible was a primary driefshg from the mayor and the opportunity to bundle all the development combeekz from the first building and indirect the amount to fill the affordable housing site we expect the first building to be the m h building the agreement didn't require it to be built in any order so the combeekz to the tndc will build low to relow and shovel ready while we expecting nine hundred thoughts in the tsp the remainder the transit dollars will be paid to the mta when the

building permits are appalled u pulled so mta receives the transit combeekz for the build out for a total of 2e68 that is $2 million for the second and third buildings without changing the dollars amount the development agreement adding the heirs for the front loading to build that more quickly we have members from this planning department here the lead on the central selma and members of moe here and department of workforce development for the questions on any department that's what it's all about they're available and that concludes my presentation. i'll be happy to answer any questions thank you very much. >> thank you very much i don't see any colleagues lined up in cue so let's condition moving forward. >> supervisor kim anything else in not we'll go to public comment. >> no.

>> all right. ladies and gentlemen, let's take public comment at this point loophole we have a stack of cards here. >> (calling names). >> good evening supervisors my name is motorcycle the executive director for walk sf and i just wanted to thank supervisor kim and the 5m developers for making some really big significant improvements in terms of public transportation and public safety any comments relied to the transportation aspects of this project and from our prospective

at walk sf we are really grateful for the developers studio cut the residential rental unit and building and the commercial building cutting the parking unlawful so there meeting what are the most progressive standards in terms of citywide they'll be fewer all trips to and from the 5 m building and in turn the streets will be safer fewer opportunities for accidents and people using healthy transportation modes to get around and selma is within of the most dangerous places for people to walk in san francisco this is a critical neighborhood for a strong public safety improvement the other things the project delivers are wider

sidewalks on both sides of howard street a safe pedestrian crossing with mint and mary streets shortening the streets longer than mary we are excited about those aspects of the project and wanted to again show how prediction to sxh the developers and my colleagues that we've been working with at sfmta and the whole city thanks. >> good afternoon, supervisors dee dee workman in the san francisco chamber of commerce the chamber representing over 15 hundred businesses with many employees that would love to live in san francisco we strongly support of knowledge project the mixed use development provides much needed housing with 40 percent housing what did you do displacing the residents vacant lots with

offices will rise close to the financial integrity and the public transit exactly where that belongs the 5 m will pay million dollars of dollars for the public safety and streetscape improvements and benefits for the central selma community over 12 thousand square feet will be dathd dictated to the locals resources will be retired and record we need more promotions that helps riots that has thousands of temporary jobs the san francisco chamber of commerce supports this and urge the board of supervisors to support it as well thank you. >> good afternoon. i'm nov noah from the bicycle coalition i'm here to talk about the

impacts that has on people riding bicycles we pay attention to the projects along the bike and high injury roads that were identified through the health department vision zero policy where people are disproportionately injured and killed by drivers those are important criteria san francisco set a goal to double the bike trips in the next years and getting rid of accident that's vision 2025 that will determine whether or not the goals are met 5 m is bound on 3 side of the high injury corridors that are in dire needs of improvements and part of city that is bikeable and walkable from the developers support those lows driving and more bicycling and walking will help

5 m is supported binding bike lanes and pedestrian safety improvements and led to the community driven plan for the street is will help to reduce the driving plans and as my colleague nicole said it will half the residential parking spaces will greatly reduce traffic and help, help walking and writing ibm biking from the city the 5m will help with a study that promotes biking and walking and in the advisory committee of time central selma plan it is important for future development 5 m has discussed and address did concerns of dangerous traffic and i also want to thank supervisor kim so for challenging overseeing issues it made a big difference

and 5 m has made candidates to counteract our concerns and make sure the city holds them affordable thank you. >> hi, i'm tony work with senior and exact a senior board recently just a few days ago noted not to endorse or support of knowledge project the project will not only effect the filipino community but all the families and youth and families that live in selma and the surrounding areas there is rules on the books to protect the families since 2008 the area plans are for neighborhood not a second financial district the developers are completely george the impacts of open space and shadows our appeal as selma south of market action committee shows that the eir or

environmental impact report is inaccurate and i think consistent there are so mount other approvals that don't fast track without analyze working oig oig u obvious with the seniors and the rest of the city you know your concern is gentrification and displacement with land values that are skyrocketing as a result of that project we find it dangerous not only for selma the entire planning has been working with the developer that disregards the fact that san francisco is a planned city with existing zoning so this circumstance have the opportunity is out of line it is quite dourjz and as a native san franciscan fourth generation that don't mean a damn thing i

have to say personally by some of the actions that have happened with some of the folks that are making those decisions i'm personally hurt i'm personally i take great offense and disgusted thank you. >> sorry sorry about that tests letting get more folletti (calling names). >> andy. >> i'm silva johnson and been

here a long time and housing and development i think that we need to have 40 percent on a lot of areas and meetings that we work - organizations we - our housing institutions have work areas. >> and separate meetings for people to have a bad tempers and stuff that is where our considerations i think have been going on too many years we need 36 percent on our lower ways of

our economies and provided it with all our economics and with our districts i am not i've been putting a lot of pages into this we have considered it lennar benefits that we- make more than what we've been doing with all those economics which really puts 22 percent in our lower - where they go to school and benefit for 42 percent on our higher you know economies which is - >> thank you, nancy pelosi mr.

bylaw aim andy imply with the proud 16 coalition here in solidarity that the selma we believe this project should not be approved there should be a continuance the first full board hearing until at least december 15th whatever changes to the development go agreement didn't change the faulty eir the eir fails to talk about the drafting of draft eir has two schemes that may constitute and fails to perform the simultaneous comparison for the vitality - the public was preexcluded if commenting on the process and regarding the shadow the draft eir fails to consider the spaces used by the public

the yerba buena children's area and the yerba buena in the north forest city has conceded the project could be conceded to forbode the shadows the eir used an continually small study for the traffic analysis the internal revenue identified impacts at some intersection but immediately addresses the feasible mitigations lo including the reducing the trips generating uses of project is getting additional height bus because it is so close to transit the project about double the amount of the sites the eir fails to accountant for the traffic in the area considering the changes to market street and

regarding the wind the wind tunnel effects the exterior of the site leona helmsley. >> okay. thank you. >> diane (calling names). >> hi, i'm diane's e diane with the selma action committee to pick up where mr. blue left off the eir appeals notes there is inconsistent with the area plans and policies the project is inconsistent with the general plan the central selma plan and prop k regional housing needs allocation south of market and zoning and the status of regulation and the good news regulations with the surrounding instead of the impacts the results were impacted under the current zones and regulations the draft eir analyze the

impacts under the promoted city codes and regulars their trailer made the city makes sense the sited in compliance i want to point out under zero public meeting held by the city prior to any of the hearings at city hall considering the projects like pier 70 were foirt was vvld involved that was coming after the fact 11:00 p.m. maergz we get a minute to talk about our concerns you know we didn't know about what the project will look like until september after the final eir was given we had to ask for the developer to extend the view the project to pass street levels not cut off at the top of page that only happened in accept the fact that

process is fast tracked without enough public contribution meaningful public contribution for the project is problematic it is setting a bad precedent for the city not negotiated behind closed doors with the consideration of the public thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you diane >> next speaker. >> handsome i'm 99 why with gabriella san francisco i work with san francisco migrate and emigrated families in the excelsior i'm here to speak in opposition of the 5 m project the people speaking to slow down the process that are here not against the development but rather within no point i am not when profit driven corporate needs at the forefront we're

facing a problem in the rapid increase affordable housing crisis making the working-class families and communities this is not about building affordable housing and filling a quota all the community benefits that is about generously doing community planning with people in this planning pr the problems that will come out of the project can't be curd through a development agreement people power and planning community is possible and the selma community has been pro-active we need this city hall to insure that basic needs are prioritized including housing and jobs and necessary services to serve the community we need to slow down the process and more importantly for the city to invest in the community and understand the investment for the 5 m project that project should not be approved the board

shouldn't rush to be approved and asking for continuance until december 15th thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> communities joseph constricting is the south of market community action network i wanted to respond to some of the points made by the chief environmentalist probably the most important point the report states the development agreement leads to a rash of 32 percent it is inaccurate and misleading it is inaccurate because of the planning code the developers is to pay an inclusionary fee and to the city's affordable housing fund at a rate of 12 period of time offsite in no case shall the project receive the first

certificate of preference holders until they receive the sovereigty certify of occupancy no benefit for the developer to - this maternity be developed more affordable housing next no reference for the remaining funds need for that senior the 0ib89 offsite to be implemented a reference to gap funding not providing those units next another false in the report is that there is a presumption that this project makes office rents and housing prices go down yet no crisis no matter the units or office space will cost i don't know how you can prestigious project if there is no numbers by the chief

consisting next the office space is proposed i guess by policy complications we can change forest citys proposal next year. >> the next group of speakers will be (calling names). >> this project has pan inadequate no public meetings only by the developers this and unlike other projects point pier 70 so a long-standing

the 5 m will respect the existing cherish the community and the developers and planning talk about creating a new community driving out the existing residents our community vision has nearly as much housing and the elements that the city has we have open space and community space we keep the denser building and have open space and ground floor we have allowable current height to the project we respect the use and a consistent with the drafting this impacts the community to wind and shadow and has 50 affordable housing and keeping with the housing balance we have put on paper something our community has agree on in a long term and sloerment short term the board of supervisors should noted approve it a continuance

at the first board meeting until december 15th thank you. >> thank you. >> canning listen. >> i'd like to play a video. >> okay. >> is it working? >> thank you

i'd like to. >> start the video from the begin and start her time if the beginning too. >> okay carolyn. >> good morning. i live here and have been for 25 years i like selma that are a lot of latinos i'm having the impact of this 5 m for me because the latinos are more living in selma but what will happy to the filipinos and the future of the other filipino the children and they're a big element here.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the reason why i showed that video was because your client couldn't make that today but i personally work with the veterans equality center and kiss gutted how the members of the communities are being organized when you ask them to they support affordable housing they'll say yes, but when they support the building of

luxurious condo and the hundreds of thousands of office space i'll urge you to really last week listen to some of our other community members and not - >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> game-changer supervisors my name is raymond i'm with south of market action network the filipino-american families have been under attack first, they beat us and dragged our seniors on the street and the hotel this is how they treat our world war ii veterans by the late 70s it was almost all lowest awhile manila town the financial district destroyed manila town then thousands of filipinos and other fathers and

mothers were kicked out to make way for yerba buena 20 years of south of market were designated for retirement the yerba buena redevelopment is diminished our area demolished 10 thousand units many of which house or serve the low income filipino the retirement had a civil right of programs and residents couldn't return to their homes and the filipinos would and worked in the fillmore district in south of market south of market is a working-class neighborhood full of filipinos and latino and black folks now they want to make program for rich people though the 5 m project the 5 m project completely disrepresents the community planning and putting 34 office towers forest city and hearst corporation have a land

value by massive zone if we let this thing go we're telling everyone in san francisco as long as you have money you can break the rules please think that about that. >> angelica. >> i'm angelica with the south of market community action need not we too are asking that the board not approve that the board shouldn't rush to approve that until december 15th state of public safety address instead we'll to see from our leadership is to prioritize a budget and legislative analysis report similar to the displacement at the mission study that supervisor campos has with the following information 2 and 4 and 10 years of confirmation diversity of current trends

continue including the focus on the selma physically filipino population that includes black latino and chinese number two a 2 year and 5 years and 10 year projection for the south of market if the current price continues and 3 one that is built for the special use district it is in family housing works are sro and hotels and offices we have a lot of issues with that project one main thing is sets a precedence for the spot zone along the transit cord in san francisco accept especially to chinatown creating this will create a second financial district court in the heart of south of market where the

majority with working-class and low income immigrant residents 34 and 29 office towers are on the special district but usher selma community fought to sustain families in san francisco. >> thank you. >> i have a quick question ann geology what is the significance of december 1st. >> hoping by december 15th the individual reporting from ted egan report we don't feel that this report that came out was accurate if anything that is not a real analyze it is to favor the 5m project and second the budget and budget analyst report on displacement that's why we're asking for december 15th. >> all right. thank you very much angelica next is

(calling names). >> my name is katherine i'm the managing director of our group a small nonprofits in san francisco since 2003, i'm speaking in strong support of the 5 m project meet has been in intersection for the art since 925 mission street and entrenched by the intersection for the art and the 5m project that showcased a lot of artists and intersection and k3e6r78d with space like the tunnel we've been able to meet and collaborate without artists and nonprofits in a way that is made

possible po by the 5 m and keeping our project low cost we are really encouraged and exist how the arts and culture are woolen into the fabric a culture organization for the artists oh, my gosh on the sittings sits with the displacement of arts this is an important signal that arts like intersection working in partnership with the developer like forest city turns things to a more positive you very much. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> supervisors i'm donald faumg with tndc neighborhood course of action we want to preference my remarks i'm speaking for tndc but not purporting for the residents we, of course, own the receiver site at eddy and taylor we aspire to

building over one house affordable unit thirty will be set aside for homeless families and an additional set aside for households that are headed by people with disabilities ed you didn't and there will is not a tally we bought it in 2007 and we now amending aim to start construction in less than two years thought san francisco and the bay area and even the country there are sites and development capacity to build affordable housing what we lack are resources we're starved for funding to build but housing to build i want to express my appreciation to supervisor kim so for norwalk in the city for negligence 7 percent of affordable housing for the project and without diminishing the rich array of other community

benefits that come forth thank you. >> thank you are you ben grant. >> yes. >> welcome. >> good afternoon, supervisors i'm ben grant the urban design project sponsor at spur here to speak on behalf of 9 and in support of the project that is the right place for density given to the major transit and in the city and region the project that shows expensive urban design with the mixed use of used for walkable public realm as a result of a robust public project based on the community concerns with the additional recession we've heard about earlier ♪ meeting about affordable housing up to 40 percent it also includes important

preservation of structures dedication for spaces for arts and structure and the design and programs as well as the progressive transportation that supports walking, cycling and concentrating it is hard to have a better deal i urge you to approve that thank you >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> randy. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm randy the executive director of the intersection for the arts and something really important happens about 5 and a half years ago when the development was put together the sprnz invited the art in on the ground floor that is unprecedented in terms of large-scale development at the end of one percent for art buys the sculpture gets put up in the lobby or courtyard you can see countless works they call it a

day the project sponsors really, really rethought what the paradigm for one percent and they've woolen arterials and culture into the fabric of that in a meaningful and long term way so we rep one hundred thirty pedicab o member projects support this and hope you'll approve it. >> thank you, laura clark. >> i'm here with grow sf ii want to wholeheartedly endorse that it is exactly for upper policy in a twrit rich area a dense urban core that is exactly the covet development we need so desperately in the city people are coming here for jobs and opportunities if we don't create the housing the crisis about get worse we've watched that city crisis escalate and escalate and

escalate the robust time to build was 20 years ago the second best time is now we need housing and we need it in those great intense places along with parks and art i don't know what more you can ask for a project that is a no brainier and thank you very much. >> thank you. >> laura. >> sorry. >> kari. >> (calling names.) >> i'm carr with technical shop that fully supports the 5m tech shop is a space that provides open access to all ages for people to learn and make things and be part of a community we provide the schematic programs and administrative reviews and training to veterans in san francisco our thus plug members

and staff can benefit from affordable housing our membership and community as artists entrepreneurs teachers and students, veterans, seniors and other members in the local community want save and public access to artists arts and cult and learning opportunity our members have created projects that launch small and large businesses and contributed to the local communities we have members who have gotten if homeless to bmw's because of access to retraining and resources we have 8 locates in major cities and thought and consider things like access to public transportation and a forgives contingency the 5 m visions that includes arts and

culture with the affordable housing wanes i'm sure what our mission to engage the community we fully support in program. >> thank you (calling names) after barbara (calling names). >> sorry can't read our last name chris. >> (calling names). >> my name is saul a residence of selma and working with smack i want to talk about traffic before i do i want to make a couple of comments that trouble

me one is the misleading portrayal of the open space by the 5m organization forest city and its support by the city planners the presentation of the open space shows greenery there is no green it is a hard-surface very dark since it is surrounded by dark building like mint plaza not a beautiful place that encourages the interaction with communities and families the second thing is the notion of the transition in height from downtown to central selma no transition the guess so the enormous buildings is so out of scale with the neighborhood and are large 80 percent of the buildings in the central downtowns the central district is much for welcoming to the

kind of programs that 5 m is proposing i do worry about the small streets mary and on the people that work on those streets are among the frail, the elderly people that live in sro's people who are drug users but those have the malcolm heinicke in a and u tom are more than 8 hundred trips a day during rush hour that makes it an unsafe area, no way for this to be a thorough way and mta needs to replan to move a lot of cars from those two alleys otherwise, it is going to be an increasing dangerous area. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> you don't look like barbara. >> madam chair you called my name earlier.

>> i'm a member of the sf behavior and want to reiterate this is a time would with the hicks we need to stop democrat ingress forest city in the city for 25 years have been taken care for the community outreach for this particular project that particular project makes the neighborhood more buildable the 5 m is a sufficient density to support the businesses mixed use the 5 m project provides work places serving shops and services diverse the 5m offices housing suit to all types of household and household under the circumstances provides services and jobs and support the diverse biz businesses it supports the mental health of residents is clean and promotes

social building and green the 5m will serve parks and playground and plaza and green ways and trees and planting are integrated into the street designs and building will provide open space and green roofs the 5m provides the car free living by being connected to the sustainable transition go walking and kayaking and taking knowing those are designed for accessibility and lastly uses natural resources sparely and generates little waste we ask you to support this project thank you. >> i don't call your name i know you. >> give me a second you'll be the next one. >> i got you in the next batch

you'll be coming up but before we get to you we'll get to (calling names). >> hello good afternoon. i'm with the organization i'm residents of selma and have serious concerns about the forest city has presented to you. >> this project should not be approved the board shouldn't rush to approve it should be continuance for the full board hearing and to at least december 15th in order for the

fully considered. >> and where there is an analysis of displacement and this low-cost when you add value to land like this and the impacts of the whole neighborhood feels it will sit in the mission with in order for other parts of selma in the working-class neighborhood with all they're beginning consequences in the system are the prior the board should not rush the approval and if there is a continuance of this the first board hearing until at least

december 15th. >> good morning. my name is a chris from the south of market action committee i'm actually, i was going to say a few things the new developments made me feel compelled to speak on other items i think the concern is the new amis the basic we just looked it up 3 thousand 6 hundred for a studio that's y not what we're talking about affordable housing in this neighborhood and part of that project these are the ami - these are the tricks that are really, really upset about when it comes to negotiate on behalf of the consultant without realizing serious impacts before we moved and what was proposed a great opportunity it is such a huge site to negotiate one package

deal that is back in the day and the development had an open process with staff from the city that actually opened up for public comment this is an deal that didn't have any public process except for the final approval not in terms of what this comes before and being developed within the community within the planning area we also have brought up issues of bringing in alternatives no matter you that is something we want you to consider those are issues i believe are coming up during the appeal process we've raised i ask that you do in the make any approvals until you have the appraisal process one it question should have denounced offices on howard street that is slooufl the wrong location i see the plans for

central selma on admitting you do have affordable housing on the site the majority are required for - >> hello my name is teresa from the veterans equality center and at this time it is very disgusting how the community is talking about 40 percent affordability but onsite 100 percent ami one 20 ami you know what 100 percent ami is the studio there is one thousand seven hundred plus ami for a studio 2 thousand and 100 percent so for a studio 2 thousand plus this negotiation going on without displacement and analysis we're ac a r acting like no gentrification in south of market and other parts of city who is this who are we

build for when we are proposing for the cultural district we want to stay in the filipino community south of market we know that what our population looks like we see them everyday 5 percent and below there are needs to be a deep affordability so when people talk about avenue, i feel lee it is a keyword without substance of affordability medians thank you. >> (clapping). >> (calling names). >> something on the overhead.

>> sfgov thank you. >> hi on robert with the south of market action committee and essentially we're talking about special zoning a million square feet what is loud we've heard a lot of different details i'd like to present the community vision that is not what we've heard our community vision shows what that looks like in the heart of south of market the city developer mislead the public in needing to building rental unit and this proves this is not the case it is zoned for residential mixed use part of the south of market youth and special use district since 2008 and it is an area that was designated for the filipino culture district as part of south of market in 2012 in the developer left hand to the

community we could a have that but instead this provides for 6 hundred and 70 units of housing and forest city for 6 hundred 90 units of housing the 60 period of time affordable is with the heirs balance policy with office space and retail space we have thirty thousand square feet of office in the special use district and ground floor retail we want to see neighborhoods serving the businesses like the community plan keatings keeps the democrat staster community our vision is on top of the chronology site the plan respect the filipino community and the

existing neighborhood the heights are the highest one 60 feet for the draft eir selma. >> thank you. >> robert thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> supervisors good morning. i'm vivian the executive director of west bay filipino supervisors filipinos in the bay area are grateful that those resolutions creates a filipino hemorrhaging district that may not be the first step our people are not displaced in the south of market it is today, the proposed project offers 40 percent of affordable housing that may not be commendable on the surface but how a benefit to the filipinos we sever this is remaining to be seen how exactly does that affordable housing

benefit the demographic i serve no incomes to the extremely low income filipino immigrants we have a laundry list of prices that says we can't afford that it is that simple now this project threatens to go against the spirit of filipino heritage district and the zones that was propelling voilgd how underserved filipino polyps therefore our culture to remain and thrive there is time to study this just continue to december he ask you to look at the community that is ignored and over looked in san francisco and yet the biggest asian-american community in california we care for our underserved brothers and sisters deeply thank you from the filipino community.

>> naomi. >> my last things i'm naomi stone i'm with california alliance of california for community empowerment aids thank you i need to having two minutes to speak lemon be clear someone that with a speech plummeted two minutes is not long enough for me to speak i need to say that because a disability prevents me i urge you to continue this process on 5 m it is too late for the continuance of this

neighborhood one thing about the fair housing act this is not considered in economic mobility and i'm sorry all of these developers are guilty of discriminating against people and if they don't face that and if you don't face that where is - because the rent-controlled unit group a lot of people of color will say yet to 5 m it is happening and compare we will give you- we can't which we want

and that is what the going on i'm tired i'm got to - because i am too busy fighting to stay in san francisco fighting the people i've walked with for the last 40 years and i'm tired of being developers who come in and say what they think actually, you get the benefits we have community telling you what we need i'm sorry to be a mountain but i am tired. >> you have one more minute left if you want to continue. >> (clapping.) i wanted it together with those

- and is we are on the same team bart and sf grow with people that don't care about the people who have been living here they are whole lives and have contributed to the vibrancy and cultural diversity of this city which is being destroyed the african-american community and because if we develop it bayview is losing the african-american community so, now you're going to do it to

the filipinos who is >> thank you. >> (calling names) (clapping.) >> you want me to have my times i'll let you speak. >> she's done rudy everything i say comes with the spirit of love and with a fight i'm born and raised in the south of market in district of you have people that are currently living in district of tenderloin are treasure island and south of market we all from the neighborhood that this project didn't happen overnight part of progress to make that happen so what people are saying is gifted go on it has been but we conquer and divide it is our own people that are standing here right now, we're for the project we supported it and part of the

mranl plan if you can get all the developers that is coming over here 40 percent housing he can get one appeals millions to the school and the rec and park and children and families money coming from the reindustry and people that are living on grrgz that is what win-win situations living in the 21st century not in the baked we're living right now we have to take advantage of what is going on and be smart you've got intelligent people we ain't dump and stupid we we're figuring out how to survive in a community that co-exist with people that are here the neighborhood has not changed we're still here and continue to fight i want to say i love my filipino people i'm filipino i love all people i'm fighting for all people i believe in the filipino heritage i believe in

the children and families zones we deserve all that and i'll continue we want to be part of that planning process and so finally, i want to say i heard this from a wise woman she said in a real world got to make real decisions (inaudible). >> thank you, rudy and united playaz. >> next speaker will be - >> i don't know how to pronounce this - white i'm sorry ms. johnson we have not called you yet

(calling names). >> folks please continue. >> i'm a residence and live right next to the 5 m project site i agree that people that say filipinos want to build in selma i'm supportive because forest city is contributing bayview garden to the community 5 m has not only been a benefits passage we're building new homes for the people that live in selma that are struggling to find affordable units my community has suffered by displacement 5 m is the type of development that exempts prior -

adding affordable units and open space and job opportunity will help my communities please support this community by supporting 5 m and i don't understand why the issue is delayed thank you. >> thank you. >> good morning board of supervisors my name is severing new chaerlz i'm the president of the association living just very adjacent to the proposed building of forest city and i can be sure we're very close and we love to welcome the forest city to be our neighbors they're very concerned about our safety and over conditions and

we're trying to make the city wired for seniors that are walk very slow like me well, that is part of it and i believe that the important thing here is many we really acknowledge that the 40 percent of this affordable housing is still the right time now it is very strong the people needs this - this is a basically needs of people you know human beings needs shelter now i'm have - board of supervisors or board of directors that this is the right time to approve and to have the kindness of the people in the neighborhood. >> now i have to tell you this

every time the forest city is asking for of their dialogue to us we always have this invitation that we are having a meeting in information from the forest city for the project we're well-informed about it and we knew that this was really good for our community now i want to - (inaudible). >> thank you your time is up. >> thank you very much. >> (inaudible). >> i'm sorry ma'am, your your time is up. >> thank you.

>> (clapping). >> good afternoon, supervisors and everyone. >> i live in this neighborhood and he agree that developers who want to build here should contribute to the community i am supporting this project because this developer is contributing to the community first of all, let's be honest they're not taking a single person kicking a survival person out of the community but openly the doors to hundreds of new homes that are being built specific for this community the kind of people who live here who are struggling to find affordable homes we should be opening our doors to them please support this community by spotting this project

i strongly support this project 40 percent is a amazing and we need the affordable housing now please vote yes on 5 m. >> thank you. >> thank you. (clapping.) >> just as a reminder ladies and gentlemen, you know no applause remember spear fingers or thimbles down. >> katherine please continue. >> i'm from russia i'm here as a member of behavior and the president of the agency of the policies constitute for many years this protein has been.gov in the wind 8 years to be exact and the developers have in all honesty, made add concessions more open space and lower height and the loss of more funding for the community

services and more funding for the mass transit those are reasonable concessions they're fair for the community this new development for 40 percent affordable housing is 19 a step in the right direction the developers have reached out from day one i think with such actions with the very open and thankful we have developers willing to do this and reach out in many ways of coming forth and ask to in in manner therefore i strongly urge you to support this project a remarkable choice but people come up and say

things we can't compare and caption this is not the way you govern but by pull together and solving problems going forward this is is the way to do it i ti thank you for your time and god bless. >> thank you very much (calling names) thank you. >> i'm oscar a retired teacher taught in san francisco state university and 10 years at middle and 15 years in the junior city high school i worked here came here as a young man my mother and father spent their time in the filipino area one of the first senior housing my people in the community deserves all the benefits of this project on both sides the project and my

brothers and sisters i have brothers and sisters on one side of the aisle of the project and on the other when that comes to fund-raising i advise my elderly we have positive things we choose the one that serves the most people so we choose the one that serves the most people thank you. >> thank you very >> thank you. next speaker, please (calling names). >> good afternoon supervises my name is devon we hear our students of airlg neighborhood design here in support of 5 m project the 5 m project is a great project that provides a high-level of affordable housing for the community

there will be over one thousand 200 construction jobs total 3 thousand jobs in general it provides more job assess for students like the ones sustaining up to get jobs and housing and overall better livelihood for themselves 40 percent affordable housing is phenomenal we please ask you to approve the project we need affordable housing now, please vote yes on 5 m. >> thank you. >> not here? >> moeshg. >> forgive me i was called earlier. >> good morning. my name is a carl the managing privilege of the sustainability communication firm with offices in san francisco and new york your san francisco office and our home in

mid-plaza with the communities benefits board of directors my partner bill and i live and work in the central selma neighborhood for over a decade this is my neighborhood and 5 m will be built on any block i not of understand the cultural dynamics i live this everyday my neighborhood is as diverse as can get the 5m project has taken an intelligent approach to considering the projects impact on the neighborhood central selma is seriously lacking in open space 5 m establishes 50 piously thousand square feet of public school office spacetolysis are a place to host and hoping to gunshot the lives between central selma the spaces provided by 5 m will create spaces for people that it would be the strongest reason to be in support of knowledge that created the sidewalks making

that safer for pedestrians and reference the sidewalks within mission and howard and widened the east sidewalk at fifth and mission a.m. 5 m addresses vehicle track but 5 m is a block away from the bart station and as you may know it is as you may know it is all density not parking that makes the urban neighborhoods trivia we don't own a car my building has 15 parking spaces we need public and community spaces that work and 5 m is proposing i encourage and in support of knowledge thank you. >> thank you very much. >> dwen verify not here. >> michelle is michelle here all right. michael d wroith. >> woke we want to point out

how the majority of people that came up here were planning about this from their housing location he talked to one gentleman 5 thousand filipino nationalities will be displaced if this project goes through it is similar to the experience i had inform other fillmore where 100 percent of the area where i lived in the western edition was renovated and promised relocation of back to the community and as a result, the majority of african-american black skinned colored people were displaced now this 40 percent affordable housing to me based on prop d fails to there will all the details in the 40 percent two percent of overhead 40 percent for two people making 46 thousands a year for single 18 thousand and 10 percent or

percent to people packing 44 thousand and 17 percent is for household that is marking 97 thousand plus okay. and 7 percent to people making one hundred 22 thousand a year plus no way that people are making that much money should be part of an affordable housing ordinance program now just 3 months ago dropped everything to enforce the inclusionary rule for a building complex that was being built in the city and enforce that ordinance by former mayor willie brown that situation there with a new building to include 40 percent this 40 affordable housing looks at attractive when the truth of the matter you are only providing 2ers of 40 percent of

the people in low income fixed with disables. >> e disabilities. >> it is not the same as item 2 the housing development that is promote for the south of market a little bit different than what you're talking about (inaudible). >> mr. woith our time is up next speaker will be after this speaker (calling names) i don't know what this is

(inaudible). >> good afternoon madam chair i'm the executive directors of community arts stabilization trust the community stabilization trust is a nonprofit o that seeks to save, preserve and create affordable space for cultural organizations we're sported by the san francisco office of economic workforce development and grants for that the art and the san francisco arts and the slal sale evaluation we bring in tech assistance and real estate expertise and funding we contribute to neighborhoods in which we live by placing arts and culture at the center of economic and economic & workforce development 5 m approached the partner for the 478 that minute buildings as a center for cultural and creative

community activities cast vision to insure with the arts and cultural are involved with an anchor to a twisting cord in central selma selma and downtown cord so in every walk of live to actress as as vitality resource for the arts and neighborhood we till seek nonprofit organizations for the arts and cult and youth programming to create a financial and sustainable appendix many that criteria will be part avenue targeted process with local and state bar-and-grills in closing cast plays the ground we are grounded if a permanent home is a unique solution to skyrocketing rents and displacement and 447 is a permanent home for the arts and

culture of the city and county of san francisco thank you. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> thank you, supervisors and ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon a residence of tenderloin district and a present appeal for the seniors in our hey seniors okay them we are telling me fully supporting the 5m the forest city project this is a vertebrae community and open to the community it is the first project to reach 40 percent affordable housing it is also a community-based plan is also a new space of open space of south of market and creation of 49 secret well over an acres public open space for

the neighborhood that also in preserving the city's history for future adjudications by remaining the chronicle building the printing building at 447 muni street and the community building of the female street it also creates job opportunities it is in the making of long term investments for youth and families it is in the stabilizing south of market and supporting workplace development in south of market and create new jobs and also to have our sidewalk widening the mobile of unsafe and more to realize wee addition of south of market with a safe

and sustainable street system please approve the 5m project thank you, very much. happy thanksgiving to one and all. >> thank you. >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good afternoon committee members i'll be speaking on behalf of the women's audio mission dapper members and all concerned thank you for the opportunity to give a statement on behalf of the communities arts stabilization trust as a partner with the 477 a nonprofit that trained over 12 hundred bay area women and girls the recording arts and creative technology where women is critically underrepresented currently less than 5 percent we're the only

professional recording studio built and run entire by women at the end of 2014 what time was facing displacement our long term lease was up and our 2 year search had not presented a site things thanks to the loan fund we found the needle in the haystack and found it where 5 m recorded we tripled our space and doubled our staff and serve additional three hundred girls and underserved women we're previously been unable to reach in the selma neighborhoods i want to give a shout out it is so incredibly important to keep the arts organizations in san francisco having a stable home for an arts organization is important for the future success

and self-sustainability we think carving out the below-market-rate shared by nonprofit will be a solution and an area where cast has sight and helps to create we're in full support of cast and the 5 m project and ask you to support the 5. >> thank you very much. >> next speaker >> good evening commissioners i'm rob pool thank you for the opportunity first like to commend forest city and the hearst's corporation and commenting for working for the projects we think have improved it for the 100 percent and the reduced parking this project really aligns with our organizations goals with the well-designed housing at all levels of affordability in san

francisco we're living contaminate to building affordable housing and buy the lands for the housing is very difficult and it is for these you go 80 us to be creative at the local level we passed the housing bonds we know that is not enough we got from governor jerry brown voted two or three housing proposals that is up to san francisco to help fill some of the gap and a project like this of this scale is showing that added height and density can provide a lot for benefits we've heard don falk it was purchased 8 years ago and beating for money and this we know this project is buying land more affordable housing i think i read in the paper every single day how hard to buy land more affordable housing and it is

providing middle-income housing that are the hardest thing to finance in san francisco people can't quality for the bmr and on top of next to transit and has pedestrian improvements additional open space, it will sixth improve the neighborhood and bring a lot of benefits to a growing area it is not getting better than this in new development and hope you move that forward to the full board thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors and everybody in the room a resident of san francisco 15 years i've been applying for affordable family housing we are on the wait list we're still interested to be in the wait list and sometimes we get

lottery fabulous that are too high so of the project i call that a unique project it caterers to everybody and individual features of that project is the 33 percent it allows for the housing if more projects with housing for seniors and to the families i hope we're having affordable housing will not only be in dreams but will be realized thank you and i hope you support in project it is much need now as quickly as possible. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> joel electricians and local 6 and the contractors association i'm familiar with is sites in e in questioning e in question i was a coach at a gym

located on housing street we'd run 4 hundred distances in the alley the 15th side of natoma was cleaner so we're seeing this project with little affordable housing with the commercial and open space combinations will be a great asset to that neighborhood not only is labor speaking in favor of the electricians trained in san francisco but our kraufshths association and forest city it has gone above and beyond the call of duty goefdz our contracts pay their payroll taxed in the city they have very concerned with fair competition and outdoor contractors is a the electrical engineers with here

in favor the project so thank you. >> thank you. >> hi good afternoon. i'm virginia i'm here on behalf of the yerba buena alliance the yerba buena alliance is a 24-year-old membership we have a difference membership representing the various entities between homeless and restaurants and retail, culture etc. and the 5m project has been that meeting regularly with the yerba buena alliance welds to acknowledge the vast amount of communities outreach and they've come several times to talk to the alliance about the project after care of review the alliance braid board has approved the project based on a number of factors which include the most impressive 40 percent affordable housing and the alliance is very

combefsz with this assert goal it can be noted to the 5 m is not in yerba buena that a neighboring on the border there so in relationship yerba buena gardens because of creation of 55 thousand square feet of public open space a boon to the neighborhood as well as the transit benefits it make sense to build something so close to bart and there will be significant transit impact fees for that there is a number of reasons the alliance supports i don't have time to go into but done a lot of outreach with the surrounding areas we voiced over support of this project thank you >> 83 thank you. the next

speaker will3 thank you. the n speaker willthank you. the nex speaker will be (calling names). >> i apologize supervisor cowen. >> thank you very much and good afternoon, supervisors danny with the sleet metal local 1014 we're here to support the project for the same reasons that were mentioned by a lot of people before me most we're happy about the wide range of income brackets that will be afforded the chance to live here we're encouraged as well about the hub the local artists and you know as well as

the in addition to the paying middle-income thousands of jobs this project will afford but furthermore, that will afford local youth from the south of market the bayview and all parts of our city a chance of a good pca middle-income career interest the apprenticeship programs with the partnership the building council that will sure our youth have a chance to have a good middle-income wage and live in the city i heard a lot of people talking about the middle-income families will be affected by this i think this is a positive thing that will this project will bring for middle-income families trying to continue to live here in san francisco we look forward to

your support in moving forward and. >> next speaker. >> come on up. >> i'm a south of market residents not far from the project site and the director of the crossroads that has served youth and families for the last 3 two years i'm happy to be here in support of project selma as rudy said has all right changed so much development happening we can understand the concerns about gentrification area they're real piecemeal happening on a smaller scale in the neighborhood that development has been thoughtful for forest city has engaged in the process for years hundreds of community or hundred communities meetings in which

they've tried to flush out the most important things for existing residents the project brings resources that are needed right now 40 percent affordable housing is an incredible benchmark the fact that stat if i had across the city too important that the benefits have been localized and support the public school in our neighborhood and important for youth and names within the youths and family zones the benefits will protect them and create safer streets wells thought-out project that has turned surface parking lots into an asset for the community i urge towing you to not slow down the project procebut move it fo.

>> (calling names) you'll followed by others (calling names). >> >> supervisors for having this hearing i'm ray a vietnam veteran and a veteran the community services serving the people in mission district and san francisco i respectfully recommend you support the 5m program project. >> 5 m is pitting an investment in the community and investment in the community-based south of market children and youth families i'm a conciliatory for united playaz i've been a consultant

since before summer i guess in april and deal working with their staff that is delivering the rec services i think this is needed i think that is needed it is needed more than anything else it, it is serving the children in the community the services that the communities is working with right now that 5 m will support is middle school children with ad h a and group children children who's grandfathered families are you think flubsz about alcohol and drugs which were that are truant and children who's grandfathered partners as alcohol and drugs but working with families and children mainly children on probation coming back into the communities just about a month ago supervisors there was a group of

people right around housing street that had four pit bulls this was drinking and selling drugs and terrorizing that neighborhoods and united playaz went out there and told them what time it was and managed inform move them on 5 m is part that have effort with d.c. w f i know about housing but don't - >> thank you, sir. >> thank you very much. >> all right. >> next speaker. >> good morning, supervisors i'm roselle and live in the tenderloin for 20 years now i'm an officer of the tenderloin filipino-american communities association i'm from the neighborhoods and i

support the 5m plan i think that is a good plan because it "yeah's" housing that didn't exist and it didn't take any housing away if all the developers in san francisco did this our housing crisis would be easy think i know many people that might quality for the affordable housing that might have to leave town or accredited two apartments with too many people into them this plan is good for communities i urge you to vote yes thank you very much and happy thanksgiving. >> thank you very >> thank you very >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon a residence of

the tenderloin and members of tenderloin filipino-american communities association i am here today to support the 5m project forest city 5 m has reached out to our organization last month to for the tenderloin residents about the project i support this project b that will would more affordable housing for the lower-income people like me lives on fixed income i'm happy they'll build senior housing and family housing for next door and working-class in the tenderloin this project creates safety that didn't exist right now for hundreds of people who might be force to leave i

think that we are all on the same side to stop displacing people this project is a good way for people to stay i urge the board of supervisors particularly the the land use commission to approve the proposed 5 m project thank you very much. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> coma folks less line up we're almost done. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> next speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. >> my name is angeline a resident the tenderloin

15 years now i am a member of the tenderloin filipino-american communities association i have lived in the neighborhoods and one the things i like best about this project is that not a simple person has to move or being forced out because of this project for a fact i think more people in the neighborhood that might be struggling will be able to stay here because the many units of affordable housing that will be built and is yes fight displacement by voting yes thank you very much. >> thank you (calling names). >> good afternoon, supervisors i

live in the tenderloin a member of the board called the residents community association and while i'm here standing to say that, yes perhaps the possibility of housing i'm having a problem even though it is supposed to be people afforded for the displaces many will not afford them i'm referring to the ones that don't have the income versus the ones that have they'll get the jobs it is okay with me but audit of that group that don't have the ability to have those those will not be able to for the record anything the word affordable is a bad word nobody can afford anything except folks you ends that are rich i will suggest

maybe change our thinking and include as our consider ground zero finance people that don't have as much pope money people that don't have the ability to have jobs and get paid good people you've seen since i've been here everything is putting in the jobs in the community everyone gets the jobs not the poor not part of our conditions it would be nice it the city will spare all the actions and planning for the benefit as citizens which is all of us but instead they're not for all of us florida therefore only the select few that have a pocket full of money so i am we should change the policy we are ♪ place thank you

>> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, supervisors testing willingly born the 5m project offers many benefits to san francisco the developer is making money hand over fist that's why very offering those benefits but the developers have come back to the city and changed their minds about xyz and asked to reduce what they have promised especially in f this case the developers are going to flip anyway, we have a housing shortage from two places the market has not been building housing until recently but the city's policy to build office space to drawing job is a major cause of housing problem we don't need to build more office space and bring in more jobs that only puts pressure on the housing we have right now

this project is in consistent with the general plan and is cumulative impact is major displacement of san franciscans who live here now and as many of you may know you know that when people get evicted economically or by legal process they get evicted from in their place their evicted from san francisco they lose their neighborhoods the cumulative impact besides displacement of thousands the nearby property owners will make money hand over fist their dlltdz and the city needs to take responsibility to holds hearings on major projects and legislation and wait for the b o a study we can get a better deal and lower height and protect the neighborhoods and the residents thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi my name was not called i'm

rose and i'm from the neighborhood i'm very concerned the buildings are big and tall everybody here is for the low income affordable housing in the tenderloin we don't live in the toivend we live in selma we need affordable housing in selma not in the tenderloin that seems like the property values that will go up and they will they'll follow afterwards in a few years pushed up over market street to one floor ore era to another one that's what you'll do with the poor people taylor and eddy is not 4 apartment unites it is a great organization this building should be for people that are homeless he should building motorcycle apartments and start the process of trying to rehab the people in the streets that

will help over neighborhoods because it will take the people off the street please do something constructive on the streets please. >> okay. >> next speaker. >> hello, i'm adidas chang i want to it is heart braefk to say not back in the day the san franciscans believed in planning and the city had a robust planning process that is it is a good plan that is a business deal that's it that's it that's outlines we've heard the business deal of the 5 m the busine business? not good mr. haney and number two not spot zoning it is it is changing zone important one particular pertaining to benefit them and this is something that everybody in san francisco understand the coalition of neighborhoods san francisco neighborhoods

support smack in their opposition it coming to their neighborhood next your vote on this is our vote in the planning will behavior the dordz assures number 3 it didn't for those of us involved in the land use fight for the last year's we've seen how negotiation happens tndc had two sites in the tenderloin and when the marketed changed they stockholder o sold their sites they're not committed to the south of market number had the money they're receiving is not inclusionary it is about the jobs housing limitation and is impacts thought office space that is why tndc is getting the affordable housing money the projects exasperate the issue the housing imbalance a project it will build housing and not office on howard street

myth 5 when the people of selma talk about the cultural we're talking about a way of being everything is not for sale i hope you all will think about that and consider holdings off when we get a new analysis on december 15th. >> thank you supervisor kim. >> i wanted to make one claim this is not to disclaim what the ladies said she made several things but i want to correct enacting owns the south of market and planning on building affordable housing on the site between 4 and 7th street. >> thank you. good afternoon. i'm jamie good afternoon, supervisors i stand before you as a concerned san franciscan as a proud member

of the filipino-american i know we've heard the term it if sounds too good to be true it probably is we're faced with this today i'd like to highlight the thinking adequacy and diminishes in the 5 m development agreement and the economic report start off with the economic report the timelyness we barely had four days to comment what i saw on its faces some of the things we should raise questions audios legislators and residents first, the irrelevance environmental impact reports has inform analysis that is clear the findings that are balances the truant not sure if if the the $2,015 question need clarity no study resources or exhibits to prepare that that is quicker at

best and the second it the economics report this broad strokes it without facts and evidences page 13 talks about the spends over 5 years no timeline or phase ♪ development where is the 5 years and then the law conclusions of downward pressures the economy where are the facts i want to focus on the developments agreement today, we're talking about the 40 percent i question how to get to 40 percent if we haven't gotten to 33 percent in a nut shell look at the language it is losses in language it says anticipated 33 percent those 83 units are all aspect active a parcel of lands downloaded and the seniors when is that built - >> thank you. >> all right. now is the time

no more speaker cards i want to invite anyone that hadn't had an opportunity to speak you'll have 23 minutes like everyone else. >> i'm silva johnson i've been trying. >> through the chair. >> i'm sorry ms. johnson just a moment. >> ms. johnson spoke. >> ms. johnson the clerk of board said you already spoke you can only speak one time. >> - >> ms. york the clerk has indicates you've spoken okay anyone else that wants to speak i'm sorry, i have a card for you i don't see you in