Skip to main content

tv   San Francisco Government Television  SFGTV  November 29, 2015 6:00pm-7:01pm PST

6:00 pm
>> when you're going to leave them in that kind of situation. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> how long where will they be able to get descents affordable housing. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> when will you notice them and notice the retired seniors the homeless with disabilities and other workers in san francisco who can't afford housing.
6:01 pm
>> (speaking foreign language.) >> so these are my questions when will you notice them how long with it take for you to answer they needs the same way with the quick notice of attention that 5 m is getting. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> will they die waiting.
6:02 pm
6:03 pm
>> (speaking foreign language.) >> is 75 percent of our income goss towards housing this is the in-law unit i'm one of the thousands of san franciscans who are going to be displaced who does are you think came a time is not just effecting for purposes but everyone if you walk outside of environment commission in the tenderloin and the financial district homeless is not just within filipinos but folks brake latinos and whites i've seen mothers no streets holy their children asking people for money to pay for the rents i've seen the elderly begging for money so is he, pay for their medication this is is kind of san francisco that we have today
6:04 pm
and i'm not sure anymore in is democracy the people we put in those seats are really working for the people who needs the help the most and 40 is for the the new thirty when people are displaced out of the south of market so i'm asking you today to really think long and hard about the families that really make up the culture of san francisco and not just for the wealth why a and elites the working-class is not enough to live here in san francisco so, please also take into consideration and this is not a san francisco for all self-defense not anymore it is only for those who have the
6:05 pm
money to stay here with the 5m going up not for my family thank you. >> next speaker >> my name is rich a thirty year ago long residents in san francisco you know i'm proud to be still work with you know the green parties and a laborer i certainly hope or past perplex you know if i f getting proposition kicked to the curve elsewhere hopefully, you'll get together collectively and find out more proposition we need to be you know taking forward here
6:06 pm
in terms of getting more affordable housing because you know, i myself have been you know a victim of a owner move-in eviction two times and i've been out here from midtown and every occasion up until the time i get effected i truly understand the injury to one is an injury to all that is something i'll never take for granted thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, i'm larry irony work with the justice cause a nonprofit in san francisco and oakland that work on housing rights a residence of the richmond i've worked in the tenderloin around homeless issue and the mission and soma i'm
6:07 pm
irregularly the board not to approve the 5m because the displacement the serious impacts that will create in san francisco like you've heard the eir is inadequate and the board of supervisors shouldn't approve that project right now this is a critical moment with gentrification displacing so many people that is a struggle a real struggle to live in the city with the stories tonight we need a community led development you've heard that over and over we need the community led development and planning that values the needs of working-class black and filipinos the most impacted by the gentrification right now i'm irregularly you as representatives you represent this city and values and represent the community need to
6:08 pm
hear the communities and listen and not approve this project thank you. >> next speaker >> good work i'm valerie a 10 year residents of the richmond district and teacher in san francisco in soma i ask you to support the appeal because the affordable housing it advertisered i don't qualify a two year teacher dictated my life to becoming a teacher at the school i work at and join i did not needs this 50 percent medium this document is available if you google it as the 5m place of business plan and see how much and the san
6:09 pm
francisco teachers make and maybe they can make it so we actually qualify for this i've done the math i'll mother quality more affordable housing for another 10 years i've asked the board of supervisors is it fair to ask the teachers would literally dedicated their life to the soma tifrns since being a teacher in the school and community they want to serve is it fair to ask them to wait until another decade my favorite part of day is riding the bus i see the second grade i know i'm on time whether i see the students on the 47 bus i don't want to be the traverse that communities on bart and knows
6:10 pm
what happened in san francisco the night before if you support this project i know i'm a fifth grade teacher i look at the kindergarteners and ask myself when those kindergarteners are fifth graders i can honestly say i will not be their teacher i don't know if oversee families will be able to afford to live in the soma and if i'll be able to afford to live in san francisco and with the teacher burden or burn out you're asking the sfusd teachers go on google and look up how little teachers make and make the affordable housing affordable for the teachers that you advertise it to be don't use teachers as our commercial we'll not stand for that thank you. >> thank you. next speaker,
6:11 pm
please. >> my name is michael i live in soma i'm chinese i am american please does not approve this 5 m project i've lived in san francisco for 11 years i find it the most beautiful place because of the people because of it's communities and if we let this 5 m project bull do so drove that then all our communities will be lost we heard many voices heard and they're loud and clear they have not think represent byed by 5 m 5 m should go back to brooklyn the kindergarteners housekeeper i want them to be here 5 years from now i want them to still love san francisco and want to still be here in san
6:12 pm
francisco to represent our tourists today they all they talk about is how high the rents are i don't want to talk about that i of the them to recognize i love to live in san francisco give me you're tired you're showing poor our illustrated mass yes and no to be free you know that poem that is what soma is about our communities are about and could i the voices are loud and their clear i want you to hear them and want you to represent them as we want to represent this beautiful city of san francisco thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good evening board of supervisors and my san francisco communities and lauren an ecology nurse and
6:13 pm
residents and nurse and filipino-american and mexican-american i bring up i'm a nurse because i have heard it will be the 5m the affordable housing will be affordable for nurses i don't agree i think we forgot that in my experience that most people i know come out of school with student loans on top of having to cbo into housing i personally can't been raising a family in the near future i wanted to talk to the board of supervisors and talk to the filipino seniors local and next door people that support this project and ask the hard questions what promises do thank you tell
6:14 pm
you that affordable about in the be affordable did they warn you how the lands value raise and the landlords will want to cash in on higher rent is this much is a good thing do you understand why people are looking at the bigger picture see the down falls of the project do i know every time a large project that is a population gross while the fire extinguisher and mexican population gets smaller in 1990 the physically population points 7 pose after yerba buena was built sf overall from 74 k to while the filipino population declined to 5 points 2 percent by 2000 four years later the sf population grew back the
6:15 pm
filipino again declined to 4 percent does anyone see a pattern they're on opposite side of the issue who was told to some and what truth as seen by others a good project is supposed by most not barely passing by half barely 57 percent barley pga proposition f would have stopped airbnb from illegal units 5 of percent voted no barelywant? >> thank you. next speaker. i'm adidas i'm going to speak in a none citizen california way but i'd like for you to consider on vote 21 to reverse of
6:16 pm
conditional use authorization specifically in relationship to the youth and family zone supervisor campos in you're neighborhood the quatro is requesting the businesses be seven hundred and 50 square feet only asking for a business door 25 feet a new business door in the memory and safety of children in the youth and family zone we want our children to be able to walk on howard street diane fought for the businesses being safe havens for children that conditional use within the project proposal we'll prefer the housing on howard instead of the 6 thousand trips that don't contribute to the neighborhood safety in terms of pedestrians item number 224 reverse the office allocation san franciscans for reasonable growth talked about the
6:17 pm
methodologies in the impact of offices we know that the additional office space is exacerbating the housing issues in san francisco that's why very they have to do the mitigation to the with affordable housing but create more impacts for you to understand that miriam spoke to where are the people now i'll tell you they're in oakland oakland rents have doubled since 2008 and san francisco hsa is causing that take care of you're own business it is understanding how you impact other shame an spur spur said they're doing regional planning in this office space were built inform san francisco how much better bart and transbay traffic would be instead of building the transit in san francisco we've let it cbo in 2009 interxnl
6:18 pm
hotel the three hundred plus foot hotel is the exception to height everything will get lower simple math 4 hundred and 70 feet is higher not lower than three hundred feet we would okay. now we say in the impacts are not sashl you think of displacement oh, this is ones the parking lot this is about speculation you don't have to believability manifest destiny the developers are having a the hearst got to us to the spanish 34er7b war and started the u.s. you mean perilism more sophisticated now they center marketing departments and campaign manager that is managing the communication not something that is acceptable the shadows we want you to reject against stephen on -
6:19 pm
>> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good evening board of supervisors i'm going to say two or three things you've probably heard from a number of speakers ♪ room they bear repetition because it is important we be absolutely clear what you'll be doing in you vote to uphold this highly inadequate eir and override city policies in order to allow this budget to go forward the simple fact of the enabling height is a multi million dollars give away to the developer that will also raise property individuals in values that will fuel a wave of speculative investment and evictions as landlord are to cash in on the improvement of
6:20 pm
the neighborhood on the transformation of the neighborhood and this will be solicited by the influx of highly paid tech workers that will be in the office space and it will lead to massive displacement among working-class primary immigrants primary filipino neighborhoods that will lead to for the third time the distribution of a working-class filipino for the third time in san francisco history what does that mean that neighborhood is being displaced for the third time they'll lose essential housing no onsite regional housing summit in the neighborhood 85 units is not worth talking about the affordability or of those unite are navigates o units are barrel affordable to the teachers not affordable to most teachers that
6:21 pm
associate groups will be disrupted address nets that people use in employment disrupted and people will be away from their culture network and for seniors that is likely to prove facility is this what you want you'll have to please think about what is want you want to do some people on the board of supervisors may want to create a new community with the planning but i'd like to think the majority of this board of supervisors is on the side of the people of san francisco siemens corporation those that see the projection and vote to uphold the appeal thank you >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> good evening board i'll make this quick a quick question in house how many of you are born and raised or living receipt you see how small that number is those are the
6:22 pm
people that voted you all in here you're kicking of out how will be that who will vote for you with that said, i'm in district 6 and worked in there 4 four or five years and the soma and arts it is path eric i'm ready when this hits the t s we'll be ready thank you. >> next speaker >> good evening excuse me. i'm marie an organizer with the cause i work everyday with tenant in the missions fighting the massive wave of displacement that are pushing out walking latinos and the gentrification of changing the fabric of our neighborhood for all the reasons the soma the members of the filipino community working-class immigrant, have already stated
6:23 pm
this project should not be approved the negative impacts are great the zoning and planning set a dangerous precedent for the city and negative effect our ability in san francisco we need community-based planning to have development without displacement there is currently a community alternative that has comparable that builds has a comparable housing you urge you to support that and not the 5m proposal thank >> thank you very much. next speaker. >> hello i'm available to answer any questions you may have is arena a san francisco resident i'm filipino and i for most of my life undocumented i'm an art and educator i currently work at 3 different places all teaching gigs as a faculty at the college
6:24 pm
and teach at a purchase in hayward in the east bay and right now i have a teaching retainedcy at betsey carmichael first graders theatre arts this is their first time you know having access to arts education and i'm there to provide that and happy to be interest and i just want to mention that it is becoming too frequent in the classroom that someone moves away and the numbers of students this was taken care of is dwindling just the other week last week one of my students i told him next week we'll do math and one of the students was saying well, i'm not going to be here i'm moving to la that is becoming the pattern and it is ready e really sad an elementary school this should be serving kids no
6:25 pm
affordable housing nothing no where for them to live i myself can't afford the affordable units projected by the 5m i'm struggling educator and artist this is impacting all the bay area someone mentioned impacting oakland it is impacting displacement is already been happening i've seen it and known a lot of people that have been leaving san francisco so go to other places i lives live a really tiny studio i'd like to see to move to a place to see sunshine but not move to oakland i can't afford hayward where i'm from i'm asking and imploring the board of supervisors this is an opportunity for you; right?
6:26 pm
to right an injustice an opportunity for you to undo the description we faced in the filipino community and this is also an opportunity to hear the existing communities that exist in the soma another opportunity to create an quilt development we need very, very careful community input there community members who believe that this project will benefit them but i'm very skeptical i wonder i wonder if the benefits will show up in 4 are 10 or 15 remembers why will we be around if we're already getting displaced at the current momentum is it beneficial for the community that's all i have to say. >> next speaker
6:27 pm
>> i grew up in the soma and want to betsy the uc berkley and could have worked anywhere but back to the south of market and worked at a cologne person for low income youth and artist i've seen an amazing amount of chapping in the communicated and once again little developers are calling the shots there is 6 hundred luxury youth and no affordable housing on site one time community benefits payment in exchange for that the ongoing displacement evictions that will last for generalizations and this unprecedent of creating a special use district on top of pa family and youth zone and so when they say there is not any displacement it is coming from people that never experienced what is like to be displaced i was displaced in
6:28 pm
1990 in u tom with my family our studio arts benefits studio was kicked out of our place and it took us 10 years to reclaim our space that is a traumatic experience for the third time my family accompany monday i'll be leaving the city any landlord raised any rent by 15 percent i've involved any my how late that about that when in their building up the space not driven by the community all we're asking for a 50 day continuance especially in the neighborhood the community that is historically displaced over and over and over again, thank you. >> thank you. next speaker.
6:29 pm
>> hi, good evening. i'm mary and i've been living in san francisco for tech sf of 12 years i love san francisco i went to the middle school and lincoln i go to sfaiftd i live and teach in the excelsior and work with the soma right when i say that i want you to understand that i'm here because consider this city my city i hope you do too i'm a san franciscan at heart that girl that wears a san francisco hat and everyone tells me you're from san francisco you know they give him that look it is not easy to live here i'm not beginning i against change if new community is constantly told what is good for us this housing is affordable we know what is good for us i want you to listen
6:30 pm
if you want to be responsive to the people you serve then act responsibly thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good evening supervisors thank you, again it is probably going to be a meaningful evening mountain valley pipeline my name is allowingcy i'm here for the 5m project and working in the south of market for almost 25 years south of market 25 years and it is totally different from the south of market i see, i see israel with families and children right now it is such a fair you know community and i am very afraid of what is happening in the future there is a lot issues expressed some eir and
6:31 pm
special use and many more and words that have been repeated time and time again like displacement and gentrification, affordable housing, community driefrn plans people don't say it they want to repeat what other people say but i think that is the goal of the like me, me to make sure that someone is lvns because i do not feel that someone it is listening i feel that this has this project is so fast tracked and if we don't slow down a lot of things will happen developers come and go i hope that all of you will be here when somebody is entangled by the development he why don't you be there before them and look them in the eye and say you have a solution when someone is
6:32 pm
evicted not afford rent because of the developments like 5 m i hope you'll be that there look them in the eye and say we have a solution right away right now the community you're not offering a solution affordable housing 33 i still couldn't figure out how 33 the new plan of 4087 units on the building that is only built we have 87 units of 100 percent, 120 and other ami if earning 10 thousand plus if you're an ssi is problematic will it can problematic if you're going to be required to make between 7 to one thousand and one hundred thousand dollars to be able to afford the ami let's think that
6:33 pm
that and not redefine legislation for the many if we're going to do this we're lotta's fountain earthquake for the many that will afford luxury condo unit thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> good evening supervisors my name is dos i represent the asian pacific islanders a f c i o and the co-chair thought chapter i'm here in support of appeal i live in district 6 south of market and in the early 90s and back in the late 80s i work in the south of market and see the effect of gentrification i can see right now the high-rise that is in the area
6:34 pm
and the filipino community is they're running away now we want to have another i hotel we want you to consider the appeal to listen to the community in san francisco and my community the filipino community has been tremendously effected if there 5 m project will continue just give us time to think and to really make sure that the community is being listened to we know that there are a lot of supervisors that are becoming to our community to vote for them the vex legislation we'll went you and remember you until we find justice to the filipino in san francisco and the bay area thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi good evening supervisors
6:35 pm
i'm affordable housing i can't a resident for the so in soma i used to live on the borders between chinatown in a rent-controlled unit our building has two flats and one downstairs the landlord sold the building they evicted the neighbors and waited for the motto turn so socioso they moved into arch 3 bedroom flat and took the building off the market so basically senior against senior we've lived in the building for 23 years seeking represent from the san francisco tenants union and the rights committee after 3 years we got tired of fighting and move forward my grant went from a flat to senior home with no walking distance assessable to
6:36 pm
their community a year later the building was up to sale for over one million dollars my family was split up and no longer had a community while my landlord was feeling it up in the st. francis neighborhood of multi million dollars homes i've moved 7 times and affording often and forced to move and my point is people with money whether say anything to get their way i see that 5 m is doing the same to the community in 5 m people united will not be sdpaeftd their strategy of buying support is how they've been preceding blind and sugar costa-hawkins affordable housing is considered senior abuse they know in the heart of the hearts they've not been able to afford the affordable housing because if it they tell him it the truth of
6:37 pm
the matter thaip their family will get evicted atheism be on board and the city will use big words to make 2 sound they're doing something go back good for the community please don't allow 5 m to proceed san francisco heart and soul has left please help our community of what is left thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hi, good evening. i'm german a very honored to be here speaking on behalf of the workers in the south of market i identify as a worker in the south of market for more than a decade and been an honor to integrate with a lot of the people i see day to day that are struggling i'm here to in support of appeal and asking you all to do the same to please
6:38 pm
allow time for the development of the plan let me tell you real quick 9 impact right now in the community right now the community is fragmented a lot in be fighting and it is hard to see day to day people i consider my family are in disagreement our community is not perfect a lot of the disagreements and conflicts have long existed before this has been proposed but it is only dense if i had as we lost so i do want to you try my best to look at the benefits package by the developer it so you would go this is beneficial but if so is it truly on impact on the community i'm terrified of the trickle down effect with the psychosis rents in the area
6:39 pm
around the project and which 0 could lead to displacement of our community so i know there is a lot of talk the avenue, i want probation officer give honor but who is it truly affordable for i know f there is a saying that is tossed around 40 is the new thirty what good is it if it is not assessable to the growing working-class and the growing low income population and the demolishing middle-income i don't qualify for the housing again, i urge you to please accept the appeal and allow for more time for people driven plan thank you. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> how you guys doing i'm robert
6:40 pm
i live in the outer sunset i have a lot of friends but i have to work 3 jobs to be in the city my homeboys blessed me historically the filipino and immigrant families has been underserved and left without the necessity support of the community of immigrant in the city from the 2000 to the 2010 census filipinos are declining to 36 i'm sorry three hundred plus representing and 4 percent of the city population up to a quarter or 25 percent of 4 million filipinos in the u.s. undocumented a higher percentage in san francisco many filipinos have been displaced because of the market-rate since the 1990s and many struggle for the housing in the excelsior today, the overall census the filipinos
6:41 pm
is going down many filipinos can't stay in the city soufrpd the 5 m over 2 thousand filipinos of immigrant and chinese will be greatly impacted by the project and increasing pressures of being displaced filipinos were displaced from the chinatown and then from yerba buena center to the redevelopment the 5m proposal south of market is the latest attempt to rob the filipinos of their homes and the 5m sud will accelerate the displacement of thousands of dpw and working-class families from soma activist do you, you got to right? >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> sue hester i'm the attorney for san franciscans for reasonable growth i'd like to
6:42 pm
build on comments to the eir that were filed by david john's we were extraordinarily active around the 80s our testimony on the eir specifically is the david testimony for the city to figure out what the housing needs were for office space what eventually was the official city position on transit and building affordable housing that led to the downtown plan, which is one of the things that is being amended by this plan after the downtown plan was passed i worked with people in chinatown just to go around the i hotel and people in chinatown people in the tenderloin, people in the central soma were very concerned about expansion that
6:43 pm
they saw the potential expansion of office areas into their neighborhood they were all low income neighborhoods the entire area around downtown was and is low income except scattered newly high affordable housing none thought at the time, we would be moving montgomery street to fifth and howard when we dealt with the eastern neighborhoods area plan we didn't conceive this area being high income housing and high income offices so out thought that we got the youth and family zone it was a statement by little planning commission and the board of supervisors i have to remind you
6:44 pm
filipino and low income people living in those areas and they need to be protected today it is all kind of wiped out because we have no redevelopment agency so we have this fantasy the planning commission can function and do a d-4-d you know the difference 24/7 a redevelopment agency they had staff and stated on top of things and looked at it did project in the context that the people were effected a bunch of you the board when there was a redevelopment agency this is not new development you have assuming the powers of the redevelopment agency and rezoning and not going to monitor a damn thing as people get displaced thank you.
6:45 pm
>> thank you. next speaker, please. >> supervisors david osgood from rincon point my family came to soma in 1849 and lived there 25 years want to express support for the appeal and two minutes and 40 seconds left what to do oh, just kidding thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> good evening supervisors my name is angelica i'm with the south of market community action network our appeal shows from the beginning the 5m project has the community platform we'll let you you know what the respective community looks like in the south of market please get the
6:46 pm
overhead we put together our community vision on the 5m site with the community advisor in the south of market the soma action committee of the artist and working with an architect from the u.s. city the community is not against the development of the community in soma half of the city's new housing is located in the south of market other projects have respected the zoning why can't the 5 m a good example of that is, we actually work with the a gi on ninth and mission to look at as a right to build there and the developer showed us the different rendering of africa look like on site and actually let us look at the rendering and
6:47 pm
we were able to click where the developer the affordable housing we want to see in the neighborhood the community has produced drawings that prove the city and the developer have mislead the public their claiming the special approvals are needed for the arranged unit and the community has product drawings this is not the case the site is for mixed use residential use and part of the youth and special youth district since 2008 just want to - our community vision provides 6 hundred plus units of housing so 6 hundred and 88 unit instead of telephone onsite bmr our community vision is for 50 percent onsite affordable 50 percent affordable is consistent with the city's housing balance policy this is not achieved by take advantage
6:48 pm
of the fact that harvesting corporation as owned even though site for decades no compensation for the land and utilizing the tax go exempt bond financing our community has office space and other space we proposed 200 and 40 thousand square feet of office and move the office space off the family special use district instead of the 8 hundred thousand square feet of office proposed we have ground floor retail but we want to see neighborhoods starting businesses walk central soma the eateries this keeps the buildings for community arts and space we were holy hoping we would take advantage to work with the 5 m. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. >> >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> no other members of the public would any other members of the public like to provide
6:49 pm
public comment testimony seeing none, public comment is closed and we will move on with our hearing ma'am, you've already comments on this item at this point we will move for our presentation from our city departments and you'll have up to 15 minutes total. >> good evening supervisors john ram with the planning department i'll make a few opening comments and staff to address the specifics of the appealed on the projects nonresponsive you i want you to see my remarks from the context of the appeals of the conditional use applications on this project that is essentially the approval the project itself i'd like to make 3 points will the project recognizing the strong feelings of the room and recognizing the concern of changing the zoning for the site first make that the public
6:50 pm
benefits accrued will not be possible under current zoning it will not allow us because of prop c limiting the housing and the non-restricted avenue and other benefits on the site and secondly, the site is a site we believe has already been c-3 as the downtown plan was adopted and it is a site that is within a block of bart and muni station and it is, of course, in close proximity to the scoping this is a high density mixed use development it is the item before you you before today and i'll point out the site on the western edge of the high-rise district a number of reasons because of the affordable units and the historic buildings to the west of the site it is upcoming likely that the high-rise district will continue to the west and thirdly, i want
6:51 pm
to talk about the plan and why from a conditional use we believe that meets the standard for the necessary and desirable the rezoning of the site and the density have allowed us to history it to the eastern side allowing the open space on the western side of the site several benefits it allows us to cluster the open space in a large grouping and allows this between the development and the rest of the soma neighborhood that provides a space that the entire neighborhoods use and provides that in a location 3 the least shadow because of orientation of the site we believe with the conditional use should be upheld and i'm going to turn it over to staff to talk about of specifics of the appeal thank you very
6:52 pm
much. >> thank you director ram and good evening supervisor president london breed and members of the board from the planning department before we address the particular issues raised bye bye the appellant i would like to you touch briefly on a key feature of the public so we have a robust package here i think in particular respect to the housing 3 components just to make sure we understand what we're going to do ouch mission street this is a piece of land this was dedicated along with $12 million to constrict 83 senior affordable housing units 50 percent of an end to the means, and, secondly, the tndc side on this trairt will have $18 million for 71 ami raiveng
6:53 pm
from 25 to 50 percent finally and on site affordable and reevicted housing in the project site 87 rental units at the 21 and 50 percent of medium income that is clear and my understanding over the course of the project with respect to the issues raised by the appellant we did submit our written response on the 5th of november without painstakingly detailed a couple of issues the appellant undertaking claims that the project is incomparable and will oblas rats the south of market special use district and supervisors the 740 paralyze in the sud sorry in the project in the family sud it is important to said what that sud does it
6:54 pm
does first, the height and level of for a minute with respect to the parcels, and, secondly, that requires the confusion from the planning commission for a handful of uses counter to the family and youth environment i want to make clear the 5m project has so you get those conditional uses and it has provided affordability beyond that is required in the sud and just to be clear on kind of an bureaucratic points the conditional use authorizations that are on appeal together, and, secondly, supervisors the appellant say the open space in the project is not well considered and not considered we the community address not adequately there are about rather is about an acres pub assessable open space on the site and analyzed to review sdpeven this project is with the
6:55 pm
city it's been discussed at great length with public hearing this will be memorialized through other approval documents and binding this sponsor to provide that space really in brief it is plentiful that is use full and locked in and thirdly, we're getting to the end with the colleagues the appellant suggested the project is in the filipino community and the community adoption of the filipino culture heritage district the supervisors will restate some of the facts no affordable units in the property today in and the project will displace none once more at the r request of the planning commissioners we had a study of the project of the affordable units within a quarter of a mile within the
6:56 pm
project site and 90 percent are subject to some level of protection i do also want to remark with respect f to the filipino culture district the da has been modified with supervisor kim to require the payment of $300,000 to use to study the integral and essentials to go adopt the filipino cultural district so by not approving the project we'll place that but we need to find alternative sources lastly the appellant says that provides insufficient housing and the remarks i opened with 40 percent of unit in this project that are subject to income restrictions and 5 m will be the first private project to steady the standards the 33 standards of
6:57 pm
prop k higher than the 12 and 20 for the bmr's and would steady the 17 and 27 percent standards for the youth and family st. jude sud it takes multiply income and the official project is a good deal for the city with that, supervisors i'm going to turn it over to michael thank you for your time. >> good evening supervisors michael environmental planning department staff ami i'd like to address the points on the appeal and state it is the departments position that the environmental analysis complies with the states guidelines in chapter three 1 of the administrative code before i get into the specific points i'd like to addresses i'd like to reiterate that the standards here for the appeal of the eir is to provide
6:58 pm
substantial evidences the commission's findings of the document being accurate and adequate and complete is somehow not true or appropriate the disagreement with the eir conclusion so objection to certain preferences for the alternative is not considered in the environmental analysis and not a basis for an appeal with a reerlg felt parklet to certify today is 16 page letter focuses on the development agreement the planning issues and reiterates the tops and the shadow that has been added addressed in our response 0 to board and in submittal of the november 6th letter. >> like to briefly touch the issues to demonstrate why the
6:59 pm
analysis is sufficient and the appellants appeal is inadequate the allegation the eir description lacks 19 it's characterization of the project and the allegation is not supported by the draft eir subscribes a variance with a great amount of housing and a greater than amount of office space it is okay under ceqa the project is sufficient for the impacts because that includes adequate information about the density of the location and resulting in the urban form the response of comments documents that changes the documents project in the impacts of the proposal ceqa compels the scombakz are feasible and the
7:00 pm
ways to mitigate or change the project in ways to avoid effects the proposal the item before you does that changes the dir and the documents and the respond to comments no new information is available to change it more has the project sponsor said anything that lessons the effects it is the disclosure of the revised project explicit warrant anything the drs is sufficient and supervisors this is a desire by some in the community to find an alternative the rank of alternatives is reasonable for the impacts in relation to the impacts and the code compliant was developed by the staff not by the members of the community and the community development alternative