up to 30 percent on site affordability which alinels with prop k goals. as i stated before, the state law provides developers up to 3 incentives which are necessary to increase the affordsability. staff created a menu of incentives for a couple yeezens mptd we noted mu nis palties provide clarty to the public and developer. the incentives were developed [inaudible] planning division and key stakeholders. creating the menu staff wanted to understand what type of incentives are necessary to incraes affordability. commonly [inaudible] administrative review and will not impose a sthret to the health and safety of san francisco.

the proposed legislation hoz 2 component, what we call the state analyzed and locing program. the state analyzed prm is designed to locally implement the state density law and limit the type of incentives and height the project may request. this was developed using san francisco sitess. projects cannot exceed 35 percent increase in residential density and density increase is based on percentage of affordable units on site. in san francisco that means the total of affordsability of a project is 13 percent or 20 percent dependent if it is a rental or ownership product. the number of intentives is based on the number of affordable unit provided. dilths height for the state analyzed program is only available when it is necessary to accommodate increased density. it is based on [inaudible]

under existing zoning and the total number of unit permitted with the density bonus. the formula is in the code so project sponsors and community members know ahead of time if the project is eligible for 1 or 2 stories of height. project are never eligible for more than 2 stories. the local ahbp is much simpler. the local program offers incentives that provide 30 percent or more affordable housing on site. other the 30 percent, 12 percent must be affordable to low and moderate and 18 percent affordable to middle income. projects that include 30 percent or more of affordable units are allowed additional 2 stories of height and up to 3 incentives from the menu. the number of unit is govern bide the height, bulk and 40 percent 2 bedroom requirement. the local program includes projects that are 100

percent affordable by offering a few more inent sentives. i'll now turn it over to [inaudible] who will describe the project and legislation. >> good afternoon, palo with the planning department. i will tell you where this program applies in the city and what the outcomes could be. where does the prm apply? it aploys to parcels in zoning district but control density by ratiof olot area. it doesn't apply to the areas of the sit a that is rezoned of the area plan which control density by height, bulk and minimum 2 bedroom requirement. the program area contains 30, 500

parcels and [inaudible] covering 22 percent of the cities parcels. generally the program area is composed of the cities neighborhood xhrlshz district sknr older multi-family housing. with the entire program area is a quarter mile of the muni rabid network which the sfmta identified for frequency and reliability in the future. this insures now housing will be within a easy walk of goods and services while affording residence to all day frequent transit service. the program doesn't reduce existing rigorous control ons demolishing residential units nor change the design review and historical process. the vast aam jort of parcels in the blue area contain mixed

use housing of-hunt, schools churches. staff smailts only very underdeveloped commercial sites, vacant lots and service parking lots the most likely to develop over the program under the develop cycles. under current zoning controls, staff estimates sites like that could development into 7400 new units of which 900 is affordable if all the projects chose to meet the inclusionary housing requirements by providing affordable units on site in the building. if the same sites all sought the maximum 35 percent bonus offered under state law the city gains 10 thousand new units including approximately 1500 affordable homes. if the sites developed under the [inaudible] the total number of units could be 16 thousand? ncluding

2 thousand home frz low and moderate income housing and 3 to 4 thousand for middle income. [inaudible] compared to the current and zoning and adds 3 thousand additional middle income units p. we have worked with david baker architects to understand what affordable housing program buildings might look like. there studies helped determine the appropriate modifications that the deapartment would offer project squz also develop design guidelines which i'll talk about that is applied to the all new buildings built under the new program. to start, here is a image of what could be built under current zoning in a parking lot on tearival street. if the developer developmented to the existing height

limet the site would yield 15 very large homes, about 2400 square feet each. if developed under our local program, the same site could fit up to 46 homes of a still pretty generous size over 1300 square feet per unit on average. the difference you see here, the red line is our current height limits, so indifference you see is the 2 additional stories would look like on the building. [inaudible] 14 of the units in that building would be affordable to low, moderate and middle income house holds and the project sponsor is required to pride the units on site in the building in order to receive those 2 stories. so, our affordable housing bonus program design guidelines which is in your case

packet, we have a few copies as well. they pull from our existing guideline documents the department has and they pulled guidelines relating to bimding mass and ground floor details from our existing documents. because our program anticipates taller buildings, the affordable housing bonus program design guideline added guidelines relate today the top of the buildings. those guidelines, to sculp the top the building. two, enliven side walls, and 3, express exceptional and complimentary architecture. now i'll talk how we expect the program to-where this program and historic preservation would intersect. the state

density law includes protection for individual resources listed on the california register. developers are barred from utilizing the density bonus law where it results in the demolition of a identified resource. our proposed local program includes furkter protections and includes resources not listed on the california register. we do not anticipate that the affordable housing bonus program generally will result in the de demolition of historric esources. there is likely to be more of a intersection is within infill projects in existing historic and conservation district . the article 11 project are in c 3 which doesn't have density control and not part the program. it is projict we see

projects in 10 in the california national register districts. in those cases, we developed 9 guidelines listed here that apply to affordable housing programs listed in districts as historic resources eligible for local, state or national registers. infill construction shall preserve historic features, character and spatial relationships. recognizing affordable housing bonus program may be taller than existing buildings rkts the design should be defrenchiated but compatible. design difference benew and historic may be subtle but also must lee legible. in districts with uniform character the design may require subtle dif rinchiation from the character. in districts with mixed character

the design my refine the character. the rest the design review and approval process remains the same. affordable housing project go through the same step squz provide it city and public with multiple points of view and input before coming to the planning or historic preservation commission for final entitlements. we have got there word out and gathered public input through a variety of avenues ofern the past several month squz our website, which is www.sf/planning.org is good for information on the planning. we are scheduled for adaumgz hearing on january 28 and in the mean time we will continue to conduct outreach at community groups and we will be

continuing that outreach through the board of supervisors adoption process later in 2016. thank you for your time and we are available for question or comments. >> thank you. why dobet don't we take public comment before we come back to the commission for comments? at this time we will take public comment. i have one speaker card, ilean bokeen >> ilean bokeen resident of sunset park district. over 30,000 sites are identified as potentially being part the [inaudible] program. these programerize for demolition only. therefore, over 30,000 sites have been identified for potential demolition. one the concessions of the

program is additional height that can translate to a massive city wide up monopoly zoning all accept rh 1 and 2 districts or area plans. >> thank you. anyoneential have public comment? seeing and hearing none i will close public comment and bring it back to the commission. commission, questions or comments? >> commissioner pearlman >> thank you. i think it is paulo, i have a couple questions. i wonder what type of feedback you have gotten from the public about the height bonuses. i thought the comment that the last speaker just made seemed like it was not understood because my understanding is this does not apply to partials that would have demolition. it is open to parcels that are either be

redeveloped or vacant lots >> the rule of the program apply in any zoning district within the program area. it isn't that it wouldn't apply to demolition p. when we try to anticipate how many units we thought the whole program would result in, we look ded at past trends and noticed generally our new housing built isn't built as a result of demolition of other residential units so see that the same going forward. >> it isn't an assumption 30 thousand parcels will be demolished? i want to get that cleared for the public because i heard that misconception. my

question is about the feedback about the program relate ed to the height bonus. >> can [inaudible] project manager joining the team to help answer question. we have done a little outreach and committed to work wg neighborhood group jz been out to the sunset and the coalition for san francisco neighborhood and district 5 and richmond. i think at the first mention of height in a community meeting in city of san francisco you have a reaction you are smiling about but people understand the design guidelines we crafted make the building subsessful in the neighborhoods and some things we didn't go over is anal with david baker teams and found a number of existing buildings above the height limit now. a lot built in the

1920's, beautiful buildings. we know these buildings can we integrated into had neighborhoods without the visual or personal experience and i think people are starting to hear that. there is a lot of conversation around demolition, both around neighborhood character issues which you may focus on and displacement. yesterday at the board of supervisors, supervisor breed offered a amendment that says rather than allowing buildings with rent control unit to be demolished through this program without firthy studies she is asking the department to spend a year looking at that. until we do that i believe the program will move forward not allowing demolition of buildsings with rent controlled yubts which is about 54 percent of the housing stock so that should curb the

enthusiasm or fear of demolition. finally, i think palo was kind of helping to point this out, but we did a lot of financial analysis to make the value recapture in affordable housing work for vacant sites, but when you add a existing building of anything more than 5 percent the development potential it becomes a uchb attractive program so don't anticipate demolition be a part of the program. >> i have one other program, at the begin ogf moncus presentation she talked about facilitating 100 percent affordable and what i heard from the planning commission last week is the planning commissioners didn't approve supervisor wieners-this is clearly a planning commission issue. >> i just summarize that because it is a sticky web. so, the density

bonus law has in san francisco been use frd 100 percent affordable projects and asked them to first seek a special use and later come back for entitlements. we included a program for 100 percent affordable projects that remove that requirement for the special use district. they projects would be reviewed by the planning staff and environmental staff and historic staff as relevant as code consistent because we have written those provision into the the code. last week the commission was deliberated on the proposal to remove the required conditional use or any conditional use, which would automate projects going to the commission. i believe they voted 3-3, so it did move to the board, but that

would be in consert with the process improvements we are offering when chare more in house and we are being silent on whether it should be public-we are keeping the public hearing as exists. >> thank you. >> other commissioners comments? >> commissioner junkic >> i'm interesting having staff clarify for us the projects that would come before us would be the typical conventional method, any change in historic resource would come to us. this is a large program which sounds like it has worthy goals, no question about that. my interest is clarifying how project will come before us, tracking our relationship to it. just more comment on that. >> there is no difference in how they

would come before you. essentially does the same, the only difference is there additional applicable guidelines. as presented the guidelines are primarily addressing dif rincheration and compatible >> i read the guidelines, staff have comment on them compared to--we have to adhere to the [inaudible] >> they were intended to spinge to balance on the fact these will be of atypical height projects that came through in respective district. >> thank you. i have one comment on in the historic district guidelines there is a image of a project which i don't think is representative of what the guideline states. it is a addition to

the historic build squgz this program isn't about historic buildings and it is about creating compatible buildings in historic districts. >> are you taking about page 18? >> yes. >> great. [inaudible] >> i was scripting myself to images of historic districts. >> the images are a work in progress and if you have recommendation i welcome them >> i know the consultant prepared the report but you may have more variety because there is a lot of their work. may be better to have other architects work in there or not just in san francisco. any other comments? >> that places on item aithd fwr 2014- 00 [inaudible] and 2012.0033

acef, 55 laguna street mixed use project. this is for your review and comment. >> shelly [inaudible] preservation staff. i will turn over the presentation soon to alesa [inaudible] their company prepared the interpretive display for the 55 laguna project. the display was created in compliance with the mitigation measures set forth in the final environmental impact report for the project. eir was initially adopted in 2004 i believe and then an amendment was adopted in 2008. the mitigation measures did not change from the first eir to the second eir. you may remember in february 2013

the commission reviewed 3 other mitigation measures relate dood had project including the [inaudible] the preservation architect design related feature thofz project and the murm identification test{preservation procedures. you commented on those and they have now complied with all the mitigation measures. this sh the last remaining mitigation measure under the eir and the materials in front of you are draft so your comment will be incorporated into the final project. staff reviewed them and given initial feedback. we encouraged the plauject sponsor to include a website as part of ininterpretive program even though it wasn't specifically called out in the mitigation monitoring schedule. we have also will be working with

them on the final design for the plaque since the city is developing its own plaque program and want to be consistent with the plaques that would be installed at other sites. with that i'll turn it over to [inaudible] and if you have questions for staff i'm available. >> thank you. >> we also have a larger images. i think your packet did not include full size images of the boards but we can pass these around. you might find them helpful. my name is alisa scags with page and [inaudible] we researched the content and also designed the

interpretive display. the display addresses mitigation measure hr 2, which had requirements for the interpretive display including it have a history of early california normal school, information about the wpa associations that the murals be accessible to the public, retain the historic names of the historic buildings, we consider naming the new streets for aspects of the site [inaudible] and the display would be located along waller park. this slide shows a location of the interpretive display. it is 6 boards along wallow park and there will be installed in pairs. there will also be 4 additional boards that include information

about the john [inaudible]garity mural. the [inaudible] the jack [inaudible] and ruben cadeish murals. this board will be located at waller park in buchanan and have a overview the listry of the campus and will also have information about the teacher education movement and also about burke who was a president of the san francisco school. all the boards also have a qr code that lead to the website being developed and the website will be more comprehensive. it will be a accompanied by this board which will have a graphic of the campus through maps. in the middle of waller park there will be 2 boards, the first is architecture of education and provide historical information

about the buildings on the campus. it is acamanied by this board dedicated to george mac dugal who was the state architect and designer of several buildings on campus. this board includes historical drawings of middle hall, the administration wing and [inaudible] hall. and at waller park and laguna street there will be a couple boards that focus on the wpa artists. it will note all the artist and have brief information about them. again, it will have a qr code that provides a lead to the website that will have additional information and it will be accomieded by this board, which will provide information how you can access the different mural locations. there will be a informational board

specifically dedicated to [inaudible] and the mural she painted. these were discovered in 2013. the board will provide a brief description of the mural and also hoohooby dawn. the murals were discovered and uncovered in 2013 and a report was completed by [inaudible] who is a art history professor at uc berkeley. the boards will documented and they will be reproduced full size in the richardson building in the manner shown in this slide. we selected the portions of the murals that were in the best condition. we will also have a informational board that is dedicate d to the jax moxen murals including the angle mural

thrmpt are also murals covered by pains that we discovered through the investigation process. his is a image of the angle mural. we'll is a board for the mural by rubeage cadeish located at the top the thof stair landing at the annex hall. and we'll also have a board for the john emtgarity mural which is also discovered under the paint in the main lobby of the woods hall. and we'll have there plaques shelly mentioned. there is a plaque for woods hall, woods hall annex and richardson hall and have the name the building, the name the architect and other information about there landmark. we think we have done a excellent job on the content and design the boards and look

forward to questions and comment you have. thank you. >> thank you. before we take public comment any specific questions? commissioner pearlman? >> no. >> i have one question. on the 3 plaques for the halls woods hall woods hall annex and richardson hall, is this the copy? >> this is the information we have and will work with planning as to the exact design requirements they are looking at. >> the design will follow or landmark signage? >> that is the landmark number and things like that. >> does a pleb of the public wish to comment on this item? if so come forward. seeing and hearing none we'll close public comsqunt bring it back to

the commission. this is for review and comment. commissioner pearlman. >> i have one comment. i thought they were very good and like every other project that comes along we know nothing about i learned a lot. i know the site well and used to live in [inaudible] valley a long time ago, so i did learn a lot. the only comment is you is it qr codes and wonder if the address should also be listed there because some people don't have the scanning thing. it would be to add information of the website. that is all. >> other comments? commissioner johnck. >> and thought that were wonderful. curious, any hope for the restoration of any of the murals?

>> good afternoon, sharon [inaudible] mercy housing. we are the developers of richardson hall. there are the murals in that building. as part the report lisa referenced there were 3 or 4 locations where it was deemed the murals were in pretty good condition and be able to be restored. we have money budgeted for that process to occur at the end of the rehabilitation so we plan to restore certain murals where the report indicated they are potentially in good condition. >> thank you. >> thank you. i have just a few comments. i thought

it was handsome program, a nice very informative and well designed. my one comment to potentially engage a copy editor to review the text because i have picked up a number of typo's and other grammatical mistakes. if you want to go through those-for example demolished is specimened incorrectly on board 1 b and [inaudible] is spelled incorrectly on 2 a. there is a very tricky grammatical sentence about being trained by their father on 2 b and there is a sentence on the richardson hall mural where high says jack [inaudible] cure co proposed in 1934 for with the wpa. it is unclear what it means, propose frd the wpa. i think that should be clarified. those are just a few comments, but i

think a copy editor would pick all those up. anything else? i think we are ready to move to our next item. that you thank you very much. >> thank you. that will place on item 9 for 2015-008484 p ta on market street. >> planning staff, the project architect hasn't arrived yet. there is a member of the project team here so if you have questions, but you may not get a fancy presentation. >> that is probably okay. you can give your staff report, right? >> yes. >> [inaudible] >> good afternoon. pilar with planning staff. before is a request for major permit to alter to make exterior alteration tooz 856 market

sfret street located on the north side of market street between ellis street and halied pleasea. category 5 unerated building with the suter [inaudible] the scope of work for the project would include construction of a new facade clad in smooth and textureed cement board panels with aluminum frame. the store front will be deeply recess squd the center entry is highlighted with a red metal frame. behind the glazing and center window is a peru perforated window that plans the height the window opening. blade and wall signs will be added. inproject was reviewed by the architectual review committee december

2, 2015. the comment of the arc are included in the packet and w unexception which i can explain, the praiject is revised to address. including setting back the wenld windows at least 6 inches and adding a frame to create a more solid corner where the cement panel and aluminum frame will come together. the one recommendation that they felt they couldn't achieve was the-have a bevel or projecting element at the base or footing of the piers. i believe it had do with the property line and a djacent property. staff find the prooposed work condition as recommended is in conformance of article 11 and

secretary standard for rehabilitation. the design appears to be compatible with the character the district cht staff recommend said 3 conditions of approval. for review by preservation staff of a mock up of the clading system. review of shop drawing or material sample of perforated metal screen to make sure it meantimes transparency requirement and the method of illumination. no comment has been received so staffs preliminary recommendation suproval with conditions. this concludes my prezen taishz unless you have questions. there is a member the project team here if you have questions but he wasn't the one coming to make the presentation. >> we will see if we have question or not. anybody have questions? why don't we take public comment. any member the public wish to common? seeing and hearing none-zee a

member the public, please come forward, you have 3 minutes. >> speaking for the 3 conditions that were presented. rustle [inaudible] from new balance. all acceptable to us and we are looking forward to improving a very unsightly building in that district. >> thank you. any other member of the public wish to make public comment? seeing and hearing none close public comment and bing back to the commission. >> comment by commissioner johnck. >>ime i'm interested to hear more about the bevel. >> on the base. >> i think it was--i think it was a attempt to provide more of a base to the building. the cement board is panels and the >> i thought that was

interesting. >> it is on the property line. >> right. they couldn't do it. >> we have a motion. >> i was going say that i was look at the detail for setting the window win the aluminum closure piece and thought that is what we talked about and think that would be handsome. it doesn't reflect in the perspective drawing. also it didn't seem the cull thorf base had turned the kerner at the very bottom but assume you probably do that. and then i appreciate at the top i think the scale is much better with the 2 panels rather than 3 panels across the top. so, i like how it is resolved from our arc motion to second the motion ato prove >> we have a motion and second. >> commissioners on the motion to approve this matter with conditions, commissioner johnck, yes. johns, yes. matsuda, yes. pearlman, yes,

highland, yes. wolfram, yes. the motion passes unanimously 6-0. >> i believe we have no further items. i would like to adjourn the hearing in honor and memory of mary brown. [meet ing adjourned]xúúúúú good moro

the of the san francisco transportation authority i'm scott wiener the chair of the authority and we want to thank sfgovtv leo and phil for broadcasting today's hearing i want to also welcome our newest and returning member commission peskin so welcome commission and calling supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos absent supervisor cowen supervisor farrell

supervisor kim absence commission peskin and commissioner mondejar absent supervisor wiener present supervisor yee present we have quorum i thank you very much we'll now go to item 2 >> chair's report this is an informational item. >> colleagues i'm pleased to report a 5 year federal transportation bill that was passed and as i understand by the president on december 4th it is called the fyi americans surface transportation or fast act since 2005 we have a multiple spending bill to improve the transportation infrastructure xhourd our roads and bridges and bic and pedestrian pathway and transportation network we owe barbara boxer in the $3 billion

bill although the telegraph hill bill lacks the dedicated funding source we have slightly higher levels of money for the 56 year period very, of course, have there's more work to do to have the long-term funning for the country we've heard the act will include $30 million for the moyer u bower that was expected in the transportation bill some other changes the return of a competitive bus and bus pallets program two new freight and transit signal starts program that benefits the brt we must not repeat uncertainty over the past decade but as we advocate for a dedicated trust fund we'll have stated and local resources for transportation with connects

with bart and local measures including the local vehicle license fee to deliver more projects from the streetscape projects which we celebrated earlier this month and i was pleased to join supervisor avalos and supervisor cowen at that 23e7b9 that included the mcallister park and staff from the rec and park department public works and mta and our transportation authority the groundbreaking kickoff destruction of this safety project that converts 4 lanes into a pedestrian walkway for mcallister park the $7 million project has collaboration and funding resources including the transportation authorities one bay area grant program the vehicle registration and the prop k savings thank you to the

ta staff fro organizing the event and all who worked on the project and the bureau ton band that entertained us and feinstein several individuals at the transportation authority for their service thank you to our cca sequence advisory committee my prediction to supervisor tang for the chairing of the plans committee and supervisor avalos for the finance committee and thank you to supervisor kim for our vision zero and leading the work on the transit 2rr8d mobility plan and also see acknowledge former supervisor christensen for her services on the transportation authority and welcome again to commission peskin as we prepare for the holiday recess i'll thank our hard working legislative

transportation authority for your work for 9 past year that was a very busy and productive year our twooiblth year open doyle drive and constructed the full name foong and established ourselves those the transcript mobility agency and with the brt environmental documents and variance improvement projects and pretty much every part of city i looked to a terrific 2016 and see if we can move forward with the transportation public speakers 19 or that concludes my remarks any any public comment on item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed this is an informational item item 3. >> item 3 executive director report that is an informational item. >> thank you chair wiener and good morning tilly the directors

i'm pleased to echo the appreciation to congresswoman the president for signing 9 fast track that is welcome news and as the chair mentions not serving the transportation feeds we've got a lot more work to do and working with the partners on revenue opportunities at the regional and local goals for next year one piece of good news one potential impact to our sales tax from the aviation administration we're not subject to a rex regulation that is approved at the federal level that allows for sales tax and local takes to come back to the airport so we the some raven with our colleagues with the city attorney's office and other jurisdictions have determined for the prop k sales tax we don't collect sales tax revenues

for prop k from san mateo from the airport itself we're not subject to that regulation and it is being workout on the local and state level frankly in the department of finance is effects jurisdictions across the united states but determined we're not impacted from the sales tax for from prop k more through the 1971 legislation sales tax for transportation uses at the state level i'll be happy to answer any questions and in addition here locally we've been able to take off the transportation survey with the leadership and the leptin help of the unified school district and geographically with private school to better understand the schools age children with paernls needs how to make school transportation easier for folks

thank you supervisor tang for leading that in district 2 we've also planned for the crooked street for lombard street under supervisor farrell's tips and planning how we can better manage the traffic and the pedestrian and other visitors use to smooth out traffic we've determined that there are about 2 million verifies to lombard street to the crooked street and trying many management views we're deeper dive to explore out the traffic and keep the area liveable and promoting the tourist activities and promoting travel and visitor we are planning a meeting for january and interested folks please contact andrew our planning department staff in district 9 chances improvement study with

supervisor avalos office working with the sfmta and caltrans to better sort out the conflicts the basic pedestrian conflicts particularly with the alameda change near main in the coming months an analysis to get the improvement of the safety and improve the bible and pedestrian crossings at the sgraj and interested community members conduct the planner in the division and in addition we've work on confirming the transportation concepts for district 11 with supervisor avalos as well as the supervisor kim we hope to report on those two districts as well as commission 8 with supervisor wiener next year our geary bus rapid transit has exceeded the period related to the environmental document on

november 30th we welcome community input think brt and collect three hundred comments that we are current working on responses to and navigate met with the community members that expressed concerns about the removal of overpass bridge had a good meeting and will meet with the community in january to replace their concerns with those opportunities in addition 6 thousand people using the new decision alter view finding on 15 avenue two locations where people go and take a look at the street what it looks like for the visualization after the project for the brt and the safety we appreciate the cooperation of the outline network and folks that provided

that technical and will be sharing the fgsdz bicycles on market street are growing the bikes we've xrementd complemented with mta counted a million trips in 2015 great milestone it is nearly 20 percent over this time last year and since the installation of those counters in may of 2013 we have counted over 2.3 million trips and see a growing and sales tax we're adrc more locations market street between hayes valley e hayes valley and a third location with sfmta these in conjunction with the pedestrian encounters will round out the measurement of vehicles and transit use and transit trips to it mix of pedestrian

and bike trips are growing quickly and i want to congratulate sfmta for unsaturating the shared lanes that indicate where motorists and bicyclists share the lane more legible and safer and has been able to increase help to increase our bicycle ridership in 0 these locations as well market street howard and fulsome and townsend along 5 street are part the vision zero projects that were delivered early by the sfmta and partners this year on sutro boulevard municipal transportation agency as used satisfying from signals update that were loot for the sunset boulevard with the projects as

part of a sales tax mta used some and replaced the smaller heads on sunset boulevard along many boulevards thank you sfmta for expending the sales tax dollars and finally want to recognize our deputy for finance and administration for receiving a credits update from stitch we are that rated last year and this year we reaffirmed aa plus the highest rating that a sales tax can revenue it any agency and reflect our are debt coverage as well as a strong economy in san francisco and thank you all does i want to echo the characterize or chair to work with us with the transportation authority and the community members that has been

a fabulous year with a based on event to celebrate our 25th anniversary and closed out the year with at event with the providers in attention to provide attention with the great britain was a rewarding and productive year and we very much pretty sure you and your staff and looking forward to more accomplishments in the coming year happy holidays. >> thank you supervisor president breed a comment. >> thank you for working with the residents at rosa parks elementary school and others that live in the area where the bridge is located with webb take care and geary boulevard that bridge is heavily uses by younger and old people when i was growing up in the neighborhood we heard used the

bridge we would run out inthot middle of the street we were kids doing dangerous thing and great to see people using that bridge on a regular basis i want to make sure that we are responsible to the community that lives there and also when we're talking about vision zero talking about keeping pedestrian autsz of in our mind ouchlz we can make situations save adding latin-american but that bridge if any person uses that bridge the likelihood of getting hit by a vehicle is pretty much zero keep in mind as we move forward and in trying to prose changes

not bull do so over some, some go that is important in serving that community very well. >> thank you supervisor breed. >> supervisor campos. >> thank you and know it is we do what we can to keep folks safe on our streets yet when i do everything your supposed to houfbl things happen a traffic death in the mrurl a cyclist who was doing everything right wearing a helmet and reflective gear around 10 o'clock was hit head on by a very long that was traveling the wrong way so it is one of those things you know but i think that we have to continue to be vigilant because the

reality is it happens. >> indeed. >> thank you, commissioner. >> colleagues any additional comments seeing none, open up for public comment any public comment on item 3 please step forward. >> hi my name is david lee i've been here before i'm sure most of supervisors know me first of all, like to welcome our new member to the boards you're my new supervisor about congestion you'll be dealing with both probable the only commission you have to deal with boats you rule the piers i live there so the bicyclists it is dangerous looflt tourists coming all over the place it is bicycle congested from the stadium all

the piers yet their landmarking good have you taken a tour of the piers they're beautiful and people coming from all over the world people don't realize but i do i live there you'll be seeing me on the piers i used to be in mr. campos district i took a bike tougher and recently referred a different world the dangers are mountain lions but that was just a nice trip welcome to the aboard you know mr. campos knows we the safety concerns are those like you said do the best you can and good luck because it is going to be does the with the boats they know me down there welcome to the board.

>> any is there any additional public comment seeing none, public comment is closed this is an informational item we'll move to item 4. >> item 4 approval of the draft minutes of the december 7th. >> commission paskin thank you. i was not at the november 17th meekly out of because i wasn't their i'll abstain on the other hand, and you can abstain from the mta. >> thank you, commissioner colleagues, any additional questions or comments or changes regarding the minutes ongoing seeing none, is there any public comment on item 4 seeing none, public comment is closed mr. clerk, call the roll on item four. >> supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos. supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor jane kim

commissioner peskin abstained >> commissioner mondejar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee. >> the pins are approved. >> we'll move to item number 5. >> appoint one member to the advisory committee this is an action item. >> okay. i understand oh, supervisor kim. >> thank you. i just want to make the motion to appoint reserving e rebecca to the district 6 for the sfmta cca many of you know that becky has been a long term san francisco residents and has made public transit a priority issues amongst the many issues she's worked on lives on treasure island and we'll see an important member at the sfmta worked on initiative and neat

program around congestion and programming providing a feedback and active in the district 6 pedestrian safety workshop and advising our office how to prioritize vision zero improvement to focus on the highest injury corridor and, yes the eliminate traffic fatalities by 2024 or eliminate traffic fatalities by 2024 and a vvptd of the democratic club that advocates for seniors are disability and public transportation is assessable to everyone and you know on the plus side lived in many neighborhoods over the course the richard i ask for your support in appointing becky to the cca. >> thank you, supervisor kim. >> commissioner mondejar. >> yeah. i wanted to add that

she's been a tremendous leaders as the democratic club leader and rely on her for advice on treasure island to the disadvantage right issues and i'll say she's an amazing addition to the cca thank you. >> and supervisor tang as chair of the committee no recommendation i--i don't know if you want to provide a brief report back? >> i through the chair it was we didn't have any particular applicant there and we were kind of dir to the district supervisor we didn't take up the item in committee and i thought that but good to have confirmation seeing no additional comments we'll need a acceptance and move to public comment is there a sec by

supervisor yee any public comment on item 5 so - oh, my apologies mrs. hogan to address the public comment. >> good morning, supervisors i'm sorry, i couldn't be there last week he had island stuff after the fundraiser i do live on treasure island and important to me to make sure that treasure island is important to everyone that it's been interesting and involved in that since it started before anyone else pay attention to it i'm on the staff so i look forward to being involved in the skraik thank you.

>> thank you very much. we'll open up for public comment any public comment? come forward you can come forward. >> well, today, has to do the islands and boats i'm living at achiever that is did most important proposal with one the islands at alcatraz named after a prison i'm tired of prisons you can have it they don't call it a prison it is a beautiful island i would like you to come up with a got to be federal a federal land thing to guess to congress we should rename that island like red hawk giving it more of a zinc and get rid of alcatraz we don't want people to think that is a prison island

red hawk a bird anal name used to be called the wounded knee 19 it looks like a wound knee to americans we should change that name would do you think it is a prison name we don't want to be known as a prison i came up with a 45 story building as a bacteria for the west it will solve the smug problems everyone going to work in boats i see something we had it where everyone went to work on boats you wouldn't have to drive only take a boat there thank you what do you think. >> is there any public comment on item 5 seeing none, public comment is closed

and there is a motion and second and can we take that no please call roll. >> item 56 supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor malia cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim commissioner peskin commissioner mondejar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee. >> that item passes. >> we'll now move on to item 6. >> item 6 reprogram 67 to tell us in a grant cycle for san francisco public works elementary save school project to the chinatown street project that is an action item. >> colleagues comments or questions on item number 6 seeing none, we'll move to

public comment any public comment on item 6 seeing none, public comment is closed. and colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order and item 7 >> allocate 6 hundred plus many prop k fund with conditions subject to be the fiscally year this is an action item. >> colleagues any questions or comments on item 7 seeing none, any public comment on item seeing none, public comment is closed and colleagues, can we take that same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order item 8. >> item 8 approve the congestion management program an action item. >> colleagues questions or comments on item 8 seeing none, any public comment on item 8 seeing none, public comment is closed and colleagues, can we take that

same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order and item 8 screened the interest rate for an additional two years and colleagues comments or questions on this item seeing none, any public comment on item 9 seeing none, public comment is closed and can call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order. >> item 10. >> support the state legislation authorizing the use of annex speed enforcement on action item. >> colleagues comments or questions on this item seeing none, move to public comment any public comment on item 10 none, public comment is closed. and same house, same call? we'll take that without objection. that will be the order

okay. let's go next to item 13 >> item 13 introduction of new items informational. >> colleagues, any introductions today seeing none, open up for public comment any public comment on item 13 seeing none, public comment is closed. and this is an information item item 14 >> public comment. >> in general public comment please step forward. >> a holy petitioners having completed the work of emotion of divided of non-holy mercy with the success and making success of holy people with wellness and kingdom so originally one sees holiness for the colortion of a firmerness for the nourishment of juva way of comfortable

reform full of work one seize of levels and- one needs to know of chances for relationships and tommy for unity and obstacles and tommy for dangers and tommy for petition one must reason why tommy for non-stop pathways are mercy for holy calculation for performances. >> okay is there any additional public comment seeing none, public comment is closed. mr. clerk, please call items 11 and telephone together >> item 11 possible closed session for the employees performance and adopt the performances for 2016 and item 17 for the directors for 2016.

>> colleagues south as the personnel committee i was joined by supervisor avalos and supervisor tang in professionalism an satisfaction alleviation of our executive director for salary jurists we do have the under recommendation before you today, we have the option for item 11 or going into closed session only in the authority worries about to go into closed session any feedback colleagues whether you want to go into closed session arrest remain in closed session. >> supervisor tang. >> i'd like to remain in open session. >> seen they're not being a motion we'll remain in open session for items 11 and 12 colleagu colleagues as you can see we performed an evaluation for ms.

chang was positive at the high-end of the evaluation and we want to pub thank ms. chang and looking forward to continue to work together the committee also recommended a 3 about the 5 percent salary increase ms. chang is on top for 3 years that is an appropriated adjustment and that will increase ms. chang's salary from 200 and 16 thousand plus to a new salary of 200 and 24 thousand plus and so that is the recommendation of the committee so supervisor avalos or supervisor tang i don't know if you want to add anything as members of the personnel committee you don't have to supervisor tang.

>> thank you very much i think that you know our personnel committee we've spent time looking at the goals for 2015 and 2016 we the feel this increase was justified the requested at the beginning the new executive director term we felt like after this year that was justified i will say in general, i feel that our director chang has listens to a lot of the questions and it was not easy for her and everyone was frank and honest what they're expecting i feel at this point she is listening to us and above and beyond and that's our feedback if the personnel committee. >> thank you supervisor avalos. >> thank you chair wiener i'll add that last year when we had

ore salary increase it was not to act action so we wanted to add a couple of years and seeing her performance and what was great that all of the goals she sat as supervisor tang talked about were actually achieved i felt she's been very acholic beverage not just with the transportation authority board but with all the city departments if that was one of the things that come out u came out were doing a selection process for the directors the transportation authority we wanted to make sure that someone would work with alleyway with the entire city and tilly did a good job and proud to over her the salary increased another thing i want to add so want to say thank you for your great services and i'm urging

colleagues to support a recommendation from the finance committee. >> thank you supervisor cowen. >> thank you. i wanted to thank and give some prospective i was open is finance last year and also on the interviewing team the year before so it's been really i've been intimately involved i wanted to not only acknowledge what supervisor avalos said she works well to the city departments but done a phenomenal job with other registering transportation bodies we have that in the past difficult relationship that's a testament to oher relationship. >> sxhaefrlz. >> i want to echo i think you've done an amendment job on lombard and many areas of

lombard and 2 has been a great working relationship. >> supervisor mar you i want to add many changing gets around to the community state and national events been amazed how much she can do for would be person and built an incredible staff as well as act as a team i'm prevalent of all her work. >> thank you, supervisor kim. >> - supervisor campos. >> thank you, mr. chair i want to thank the executive director for the professional growth we've seen since she came on

board and you know, i was chair alcohol, tobacco & firearms authority before that intuition it's been great to see since the evolution nevertheless of the alleged not only knowledge but the way she interacts with the community congratulations and the raise is well deferred. >> supervisor breed. >> thank you. i wanted to add my $0.02 i was concerned in the beginning as you may know and you've definitely approached of proved me wrong i appreciate the work with my constituents and district 5 to address challenging issues we have we've got a lot more work to do and you provided the right leadership to do that work and you're team and the folks at the ta have done a tremendous job so

i definitely support in raise it is well deserved. >> thank you, supervisor kim. >> thank you. i also wanted to add my words i have really been supportive of director chang on this position given her years of dedicated service to the transportation system her knowledge of san francisco and her knowledge of the agency you shined and gone above and beyond i thought you would be able to do i think that is great to see you out and about at the events of the many hours directing the agency that is incredible important for the city's and to see who the transportation director and build a trust that is the way to build a better system for all by having community relationship but also want to appreciate you're

leadership at san francisco transportation authority and thank you for being a san francisco resident and you're family attended the public schools. >> thank you supervisor yee. >> not much to add yes not only san francisco residents but other residents going to the elementary schools for kids but i guess i'm not surprised i anticipated you would do a good job when we offered you the position and you've proved me right. >> thank you for embracing like the other city families embracing vision zero. >> thank you, colleagues any additional comments ongoing so. >> actually, one more comment.

>> and i'll make it, it is really clear from just the staff in the transportation authority that the staff has a great everyone is working really arrested e hard to support our decisions i want to make sure that is pointed out that tilly with the leadership within the organization has been phenomenal as well thanks. >> great, thank you okay yes. >> ms. chang. >> thank you so much to each of you for those kind words i'm humbled and appreciative of our support with the recognition with the transportation authority to all the your staff and sales for giving us time and guidance and support mentoring letting us grow and make some mistakes along the way but the

guidance when that happens to be improving our work there is room for feedback we're grateful for the leadership you provide on things like the vision zero initiative creating a treasure island mobility agency a computing u brand new role of 25 years we're striving to meet the community expectation as those policies get formulated make sure the impacts and investments are benefiting the whole community and understanding the weirder impact whether the blood splatters or planned b area to get smart of areas like 9 affordability and displacement and really rely on iuoe you and your staff thank you for spending you're time we're grateful and continue to do a better job as we move forward. >> thank you, ms. changing. >> okay any public comment?

on item 11 or item 12 seeing none, public comment is closed and items 11 and 12 are action can we do this with one vote. >> please call roll. >> items 11 and 12 supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor malia cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor peskin supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee. >> that item passes. >> item 15 and item 15 adjournment. >> we're adjourn

>> all right. good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, the meeting will come to order this is the regular meeting for the land use committee and transportation committee i'm supervisor cowen to my right is supervisor wiener who's the chair and to my left is

supervisor jane kim our clerk is miss alicia i'd like to take a moment and tank jim smith and jessie larson for broadcasting in meeting madam clerk any electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the january 12, 2016, board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated all right. thank you very much call item number one. >> a resolution authorizing the issuance and sale and deliver the house bond not to exceed money for the minnesota for a rental unit is alice griffith apartment t projects. >> colleagues ms. elizabeth from ocii to make a brief presentation on this item welcome.

>> the floor is yours. >> good afternoon, supervisors elizabeth with the office of economic development ocii the resolution before you authorize the bond precedes to pay for the construction and related costs for alice griffith phase 3 an walker drive ma comic and other are the nonprofit housing development corporation and additional team meshes with the housing authority and other agencies at alice griffith the third phase of the redevelopment of 200 plus alice griffith site as a mixed income development with the hope sf consist with those principles no residents will be permanently displaced as a result of that cement development and the circulations will rain the same what 9 redevelopment is complete

all 200 up unit plus will be replaced w with affordable units three hundred plus and inclusionary units and 200 and 37 workforce units phase 3 is 1 a and 22 units split into 3 ab for the exit of the development only phase a low get the bond financing that the subject of today and phases will be 56 replacement and other manage units phase 3 is a mix of 1, 2, 3, 4 and bedroom units for 50 percent of medium income for a family of 4 phase 3 like phase

one and phase two one of the benefits their adjacent to the existing houses residents will move from their existing unit without being temporary located and complete by the end of next year in demolition is equipment prior to 2017 the lennar corporation is the master advertent for the hepatitis with a formal san francisco redevelopment now appendixes when lennar is required for the terms of d da for a phase of alice griffith that subsidy is $10 million and appendixes provides a subsidy for phase 3 it is approximately 10 and a half million dollars in august of 2011 the development team was awarded an initiative 0

grant not to exceed of 35 point plus million dollars to be used for alice griffith the c n ii has a statutory obligation that the grant fund must be - for the portions of the fund phase one and two being used on phase 3 the bond issuance before you today will along with the funding allow the project meet the critical hud deadlines this transportation authority plans & programs committee traction is conduit that doesn't require the city to repay the bonds it was smimentdz to the committee in 2011 and awarded in past october the project is sliced to begin by february 2016 and complete construction by

late 2017 with me is daniel to answer any questions that concludes my presentation. thank you. >> well, thank you very much and thank you for being here as well let's go ahead and take public comment seeing no comments from the commissioners public comment is open. >> good evening supervisors could i get action right here ax washington. >> okay. >> i'm here in protest i know things go on i'm talking about the interesting party with hud that has come to the city and the action get mugged the residents again know a hill of beans what is happening and only a couple of minutes i protest the only getting 2 minutes i'm so to speak as the czar of the

out migration you'll hear that through this project in the next 10 years because lieutenant newsom put together a mechanism and institution for the african-americans blacks in the san francisco and i am appoint the czar whatever the city put together i'll be in that car i'll go on to breakdown what is going on here those procedures supervisor cowen are clearly out of order with every organization ma comic and lennar you've got san francisco housing authority development do you know the history from johnson that fought for the certificate of preference but supervisor cohen and supervisor breed for putting

the legislation together that is the beginning we'll have to rearrange this concept of rad because the tenants will be mad the p t p and all of that they've been studying the structure with none from doing so-called ace but aches and be here utilizing this airtime i created the government channel i'll utilize it in the best community thank you. any other speakers that want to speak at this point seeing none, public comment is closed colleagues, any discussion no okay. great all to make a motion to opening it up for public comment to keep this important rebuild of the alice griffith sited moving forward is there a semiautomatic to my motion? >> semiautomatic. >> thank you seconded by

supervisor kim. >> madam clerk item 2. >> a resolution condoning for 6 months the interim controls for the neighborhood district to require the conditional use authorization for the proposed formula retail use. >> great, thank you and she is the author of that item and will speak and lead the discussion. >> thank you, madam chair as you recall about 18 months ago passed interim controls i authored relating to the formula retail use in the castro street commercial district to address a loophole where someone or an establishment could make an application be determined to be formula retail and then make a superficial changes to the application inform effectively

gain the system and take themselves out of formula retail complication avoiding the the interim controls they're to address that will that by preventing that from happening formula retail rules are very for the voters adopted them overwhelmingly we want them to be honored and not gained those interim controls will be xrooir next month and so this these current controls extend the controls by 6 months so colleagues, i ask for your support we do not have a very well presentation so make madam chair, i ask we own up for public comment. >> all right. there is a motion and a second please come down to

the podium with 2 minutes thank you. >> thank you, madam chair bryan patterson the attorney for the foundation for h f f that is an have not nonprofit organization dictated to provide cutting-edge medication to patient in san francisco this proposal before you today is pure and simple in reality it is not and we encourage you to take a closer look not complete in extending inefficient interim controls they're targeted at h f f to prevent hiv pharmacy in the castro to keep out san francisco aids organization this controls require conditional use

applications for proposals that are not actually formula retail and in fact in this case with ah f pharmacy it is at 518 castro street the application was required to consider two things one in terms of the harm to the public and the owner there is no harm to the public with letting this proposal continue forward h f project to continue forward the farm of allowing the controls to be pursued is giant patient care requiring the double represent for other facilities as long as this remains in effect no finding in the proposed extension to justify this we'll we will request an exception from the

interim controls will be be in effect and the cu application on january 4th. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm dale the bay area director for aids foundation to voice the interim controls extension the property owner is aware of and in support of our project to relocation a pharmacy 3 had had feet away from where it exists a h f f is harmed we're forced to pay 12 240us dollars plus a month our patients over 15 hundred between the fireman and the health care center have expressed a desire to locate our services in a single-space when patients

receive all of the services under one roof they do better and benefits the community we would like to see those not pass today thank you. >> thank you very much seeing no other public comment public comment is closed. thank you. >> i'd like to speak. >> i'm sorry, i just closed public comment i gafd down i'm sorry is there a specific direction to agendize this item. >> thank you, madam chair i do want to note in terms of the public comment the representatives including the attorney from the health care foundation the health care foundation did in response to those interim controls file an application that will be heard at planning commission next month in january and in the ends he understand the aids health

care wants a comprehension for the requirement in san francisco we require people to go to conditional use even if the applicant would prefer not to, in fact, in the castro we've had various instances where for profit and nonprofit in the neighborhood gone through an conditional use process and not tried to gain the system accepted the process as the law of land in san francisco and gone through the process so this is again simply preventing the gaming of our system so colleagues, i move that we forward item 2 the interim controls to the full board of supervisors with a positive recommendation as a commissioner lee report. >> all right. motion by supervisor wiener seconded by supervisor kim and without

objection this that motion carries and mr. clerk would you be so kind to please call item number 3. >> an ordinance amending the planning code for the measurement methodology for the top paramount for the in fill floor areas in the c-3 zoning to exceed the height limit. >> much so colleagues my understanding the project sponsor is in discussion with the shareholders in labor on this particular ordinance and requested a continuance until january 26th meeting so we're going to take public comment on this item there's a lot more work to do on item 3 please do so. >> yes my name is silva johnson and this planning control

disrespect is only doing that so that they can put the presentation that is required in the health care issues and this you know should be you know as automatically you know a visit in the which my social worker mistakenly included me in on another and closed the issue on me and i think that when i i'm have school closes clay's on this issue and want me to go to parks it means i need a car or in order to go through all this

these engineering places that the packaging places that they have here have not yielded even you know put on the best strategies he need to do all this to fulfill it the rule that you know, i include on this has not been in stake any of it so i think that a lot of this has been like put off like the bank had it and i went to prisoner and my car was sold and the money put in the bank they wanted to put me off on this issue and housing being built to be investigated on to -

>> thank you. is there any additional public comment on item 3 seeing none, public comment is closed at this point thank you. >> so colleagues is there a motion to continue to the january 25th meeting. >> i'll make that motion. >> thank you, supervisor kim seconded by supervisor wiener and this motion passes unanimously thank you thank you are any other items before us today. >> there's no further business. >> no furniture business therefore this meeting is adjournedokay.

>> good afternoon, everyone this is the friday, december 11, 2015, meeting the public safety and neighborhood safeway committee of the board of supervisors i'm eric mar the change and to my right is supervisor campos and ms. alyssa we're being televised by sophisticating thank you to jim smith and charles kremack to this is not live but will be posted on line

and give us our announcements devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the january 5th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> thank you. i would to begin with voices of young people that are outside of city hall and marching on san francisco streets today. >> don't shoot. >> (repeated.) you guys hear me do not shoot. >> (repeated.) do not shoot. >> reverend black lives matter. >> as wear meeting hundreds of young people that walked out of mission high school and high schools around san francisco from the reports of the weekly san francisco community school june gordon and galileo and

lincoln and mission and gateway and many other middle school are participating i think a lot of the mercy housing are hands up don't shoot my hopes many mroflgz will treat them with respect their and right to protest is represented with that, could you please call the first item autopsy an ordinance amending the police code. people leaving or storing a load vehicle with a gun >> the sponsor sponsor a supervisor campos that if you i want to note that this is a very important item for us and the scope of the original ordinances that focused on law enforcement

personnel leaving fire arms in vehicles expanded to now politically to anyone that finds themselves in the city and county of san francisco who is a gun owner and makes the choices of storing their gun in an unattended vehicle we wanted it so in san francisco certain rules and procedures are followed we want to keep those guns from ended up in the wrong hands i look forward to hearing the public comment i want to say at the outset from the beginning we have pushed to move it this legislation forward as quickly as possible legally, however, things we have to do which one of the things it is critical to meet and confer with the law enforcement personnel that work in the city and county of san francisco that can be a process that takes time and so we have

started that process we're on a the middle of the process because of that once public comment is completed i'm to ask to continue this item to the call of the chair because of the meeting confer process not have this ordinance move forward until the process is completed we hope will happen in january of this coming year. >> thank you supervisor campos i wanted to acknowledge supervisor yee is a co-sponsor as well as myself and let's open up for public comment we have one card i know that r0sh89 wants to speak and ms. brown anyone else be please come forward that will be continued to the call of the chair after public comment. >> sir. >> go ahead walter.

>> please store those guns safely because of those guns there is no no where to run no where to hide once e would you store them safely no where to run or hide keep is safe and raw you'll be safe by and by thanks. >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> we're going to close public comment if people don't come up to speak right now. >> next speaker. >> hello my name is paulette brown i'm here in respect to my son who was murdered august 14, 2018, he was shot with an

semiautomatic gun thirty rounds into my son today his case is not solved i'm concerned about the gun violence that's been going around it says here that gunfire firearms are the third leading killer of children alps 1 to 17 how many guns are going to be on the street killing our children how many guns are brought out of trunk we think about the young man that did the mural was shot and that gun was stolen out of a police officer vehicle how many guns are going to be stolen and who's account for our children where the guns are out of the police officers vehicles or whether their came into from our children buying guns illegally how long will the

mothers suffer we say all lives matter black lives don't matter but all lives matter all i have left my son's death laying on a jury necessary and this is what cabin violence did for my son we want justice for our children keep our cases open and make those police officers accountable for what happened to laurel woods because u because the mothers never get over the pain by police or black a black all lives matter thank you ms. brown. >> next speaker. >> my name is robert

carrageenan supervisors regarding the storage of firearms in unattended motor vehicles some provisions in the section are unworkable for the ordinance one method of storage is to have a lockbox affixed to the trunk another allow able to have a lockbox permanently affixed to the vehicle underneath wants seat and shout out guns and rifles are covered under this case a lockbox would be bigger? not going to fit under the seat of a car and many cars who's trunks are two small and having a lockbox in plain sight is an invitation for thieves to steal and in addition people you get or often travel with people that go to fire ranges and permanently attach

two or three lockboxes is unworkable thank you. >> is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak public comment is closed. >> mr. campos. >> thank you very much again, i want to thank the speakers and i especially want to acknowledge ms. brown for coming to this board time and time again to remind us of the tragic lives that the tramples that have taken the lives of so many people because of gun violence and noted because of the meeting confer process i'm going to make a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair in the hope that the meat and confer will meet in january and finally take action in san francisco on this ordinance in january what i would say to the

gentleman that spoke about how complicated and difficult to store firearms in a vehicle what we're saying here is that if you choose to leave a firearm in an unattended vehicle there are certain things to do in the city and county of san francisco you can choose not to leave a firearm in an non-attended vehicle and this is not in any way infringe on anyone's second amendment rights when you are the owner of firearms there are certain responsibilities you should you have and certain things you have to do consistent with those responsibilities with that, i'd like to again make a motion to continue this to the call of the chair and thank you to my staff and hope to have a

vote as quickly as possible in january thank you. >> we'll do that without objection thank you madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body? >> there's no further business. >> thank you very much meeting adjourned i should announce 5 meeting the joint meeting of lafco good afternoon today is tuesday, september 22, 2015. welcome to the local agency formation commission of the san francisco ethics commission my name is john avalos the chair of the commission and will be a joint commission joint meeting that the public safety and neighborhood committee i'll allow the chair of the committee

to open up that meeting. >> thank you chair avalos i'm eir mar to my right is supervisor avalos and we're always police department of pleased to have joint meeting with lafco. >> our clerk is alyssa and today's joint meeting is broadcast by sfgovtv staff jim smith and charles kremack also erica major is co-clerking this meeting madam clerk, any announcements? >> electronic devices. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. >> thank you and could you please call the roll for lafco commissioner avalos commissioner breed absent. >> commissioner campos and

commissioner crews commissioner lindo commissioner mar player you have a quorum how do we want to do this mr. chair. >> a motion to excuse commissioner breed. >> to excuse if lafco supervisor breed commissioner breed a motion from commissioner crews and seconded by and excuse the newest appointees from this meeting and seconded by supervisor campos we'll take that without objection. >> okay. if you could call the first item. >> item within we think the board of supervisors urging the california public utilities

commission to reject the pacific gas & electric proposed increases to net be able to metering fees. >> just want we want to call them at the same time call 2. >> item 2 the board of supervisors file urging the california public utilities commission to re-examine fairness of increases. >> okay. very good thank you m madam clerk and colleagues two resolutions before us that are very, very important, important our cleanpowersf effort pg&e has filed with the california public utilities commission two motions seeking to one to get changes in the net metering program that will be similar harmful for people in san francisco and over lafco our cleanpowersf program

also they've proposed a new fee for the exit fee for the power electrical power from pg&e when people customers go into the cleanpowersf program the proposed fee is called the what is is called mr. fried actually trying to draw that up. >> you're talking about the exit fee. >> yes. >> the public charge in different power charge in different adjustments. >> the power charge in different adjustments. >> correct yes. >> so the impact of those two fees own the program for cleanpowersf would reduce the funds we have available for build out and could make our program less competitive with

pg&e and preventing us from the robust roll out and less funds to do build out this is a direct attack against our cleanpowersf power program two resolutions to say ask the california public utilities commission not to approve those increases that is dramatic two increases for the residents i think that is important to talk about some of the things going on behind the scenes that's been going on earlier this year we put on two measures on the ballot the lafco and city put on proposition h that was really about move forward with our cleanpowersf program and have a clear statement about what kind of energy we're producing the iuoe under stern have put out their

own version of the property g do undermine our effort would be they realized that the city was probable going to prevail on our measure that would not be good for them and their measure would lose and it very well well, did to you make sure they're not attacking our measure and stern from i b w worked very much to try at one end promote the measure he was going to try toy kill prop g earlier this week, i was tarnishing to mr. stern he said the energy fee that is working its way to the public

utilities commission was all but settled our resolution before us today regarding the metering was really not important anywhere i don't believe that is true and talking with lafco jason fried sdrook interest the california public utilities commission has not made a decision on the net energy metering and talking to a liaison who is here in 9 puc who's name a cody he said the decision is not made either so here's what howard stern told me are signed the metering decision is pretty much set nothing it changing and i don't believe that is for what i've been hearing that is

true things are locked up between ibw and the california public utilities commission to present and let us know what we have before us. >> sure jason fried executive director for lafco on those matters i've invited speakers if a statewide level and have presentations on each of the items into a local level how it impacts san francisco directly so we will take them in the order on the agenda and our presenter from solar to present followed by a receptionist in the san francisco environmental department talking about the impact the lafco and the pc i a and having lean energy present on a statewide prospective and

have the sfpuc how to impacts us with that, i'll call of sue huh-uh h h sue is an do the presentation and the next presenter after that. >> convalescent committee members thank you. i am supposed to say sfgovtv goes to the power point so, yeah i'm susan the west coast with go solar a nonprofit advocacy organization that is working around the country to bring solar into the mainstream about the efforts to slow down the rooftop by attacking and policy called net meters we're in the middle of the debate the commission has not made a

determination i could talk about this topic for many hours but keep it to 5 minutes as a context to start important to note we're reilly in the midst of a rooftop innovation in san francisco we serve 3 percent of big incurs demand the average price has dropped by more than half by 2009 and tripled the solar on the rooftop since 2011 and seeing 2/3rd's of the rooftop solar installation happening in lshgsz neighborhoods it is good news for the state but prompting a backlash that seize it as a threat is their directly attacking net meters not only in california but dozens of other

states across the country an explanation of what net metering and simple method for crediting people so when a roosevelt is producing more energy than the confers needed it get sent back the grid owe the skpz sell it so the metering makes sure that the similar customers get credit it allows their meters to roll backwards and give us full retail credit for kilowatt for the clean they're paying the utility when necessary buy the hours so legislationer passed it in the early 2000 and have it in place across the country but in

2013 in response from the utility the legislator passed a law that told the commission by the end of this year determine what the net goals should be when they reach a 5 percent cap what 5 percent of the peak demand is served by the rooftop solar and pg&e will hit that cap around the middle of next year and so all 3 of the utilities as a proceeding in the puc have submitted proposals to end that 3450er9 and drastically reduce the solar bill saves and each utility proposed a different proposal but at pg&e they have a host of different proposed changing reduce the bill by more 50 percent that ends the metering you get the same credit

for what is returned to the grid and on top of to add a 3 there's per kilowatt monthly demand charge it is pegged to the maximum demand that a customer buys from the utilities so it is hard for residential customers to predict we see anywhere in the country the utility has levied levied a demand charge the customers don't know their maximum demand will be and it is difficult charge to manage more them as well to pg&e is proposed to disallow rolling over the bill credit that is part of our net metering structure and they've made other proposals i'll not get into detail but you know it is essentially if pg&e proposal was adopted by the puc it will drastically reduce the savings to the customes