also, i am a resident. although i think she has been a great asset to the board and behaves reasonably, i agree that it's not a requirement of the see the. there needs to be a waiver for that. it says the charter says -- there is no explicit way. if you threek legislative mystery, it doesn't say anything like this is a see the that you're supposed to be a resident. you're supposed to be a resident unless no one else wants the see the. so where i live in san francisco is important in this. i live on the west -- or the mission edge of district eight. it's been a very heavily-graffitied area. it's ground zero for graffiti

is. it gives you a feeling of what graffiti is to san francisco than living in a different suburb does because you talk to your neighbors about it. you sphee it gets cleaned up what. if it doesn't get cleaned up, it stays longer. you're in a part of the city where there are other crimes. you git the discussion with other people. should the police be prioritizing fra feet graffiti more or less? should we prioritize graffiti higher? or is it something that in effect doesn't matter so much? i think like that's wiercioch the things that living there in an area of high graffiti that i bring diversity to the board. i'm afraid too much of the mind set of the board is it's too much of a police matter. and yet, it's a police matter, but if you look during the meeting today, i got a tweet of

an article coming in. woman who had a 200,000-dollar thing, she's out there still graffitiing police cars and stuff. there is only so much the police can do no matter how good they are and the judges, they see everything. they say we can't just fine people more for this. i think a lot of is the people of san francisco having the same point of view. it's not really a view of the efficient hearing on the board. there is too much of going there. the other thing i want to say about myself is i made myself an expert. i'm probably the top expert in going to the sf-one or data portal and getting all the informatio information out there. so last year, there were 58,000 graffiti reports into the 3-1-1

system. 58,000! it's a lot of graffiti for a city the size of san francisco. the numbers are going up. that was 11,000 more graffiti reports than in 2014. just three months so far in this year we're already 5,500 graffiti reports higher than last year. can you go to the graffiti advisory report? they're supposed to send to the mayor and ask them what is happening? no. the report hasn't happened. they're doing good things but the main thing they -- main task is on page three and five of the packet for you isn't happening. what is happening is it's not so much -- i have the expertise that i'd like to use. what is happening is the app. on the phone now you can go and put in a report graffiti an the quality of data is so much

better than when people call up. phone calls are calling like 4, 5 and $6 per phone call. it's lower on this. plus you get g.p.s. and a goat. whaother things like that. you see a lot of the youtubeer typ -- the uber tieb thing anububer type of thing. that's where we ought to be as a graffiti thing putting our efforts into using this great data that is now available through the app and have them cleaned up. and some of the commercial organizations are the worst offenders. yes, we can look at the graffiti vandals, but we have to look at who are the institutions or

large governmental people or the pg&e, at&t, u.s. postal offices that have a lot of property in san francisco and a lot of graffiti and it's not cloned up quickly enough. chairman tang, i wept to your office and spoke with the people trying to say why it is. i heard back the constituents are calling in and saying we're reporting the graffiti and it's not being cleaned up. that's where the anger point on this is. that should be another thing that very much the board should be doing. the technology is there. the pictures are there. it's not like before when it was called in and someone would say it's new graffiti. if you have the picture and time stamp, it's closed. i sent -- 30 times it was handwritten sent to pg&e and it

wasn't cleaned up. there are groups out there that are not responding when the graffiti is done. i have this hope, like graffiti and crime is collocating. maybe it's a bit of a dream if you clean up the streets and that, that there will be less crime, but some of it is there. if we keep the data cleaner, we can find out, is it true if you clean up the graffiti quickly, you check that it's been cleaned up quickly, tack be done. i'm a resident, i feel, i've made myself an expert on it. i believe the res depsy required is there. jana brings a good voice out there. what she says is correct, but i think i bring another voice that needs to be heard. as a group, the advisory board doesn't hear my voice.

the people who have my voice live in an area with graffiti afternoo often if you have. >> thank you very much. any questions? commissioner cohen. >> i'm in agreement with mr. dillon's assessment of priority given to folks that live in san francisco. i agree that that should be a priority. given my policy, i've sat on rules committee for a long time and i prioritize those that live in san francisco. i agree with your assessment if you're outside san francisco and want to serve an there is no one interested in the san francisco, it should be given a priority. i'm in agreement with mr. dillon. i am concerned about miss amy landgraph. she applied for the see the but indicated she's never attended a meeting. in past, i'm uncomfortable

appointing someone to a body -- >> call on her though answer that question. >> that has not attended a meeting even developed a deep understanding for the public process. and so, -- >> i'd lick to address that. at the time of the application i hadn't been to a meeting but i've been to a couple meetings so far. so i've been a part of the board and trying to get involved and also a part of subcommittee as well for the fight the blight in may. >> with all due respect, attending a meeting, a couple of meetings doesn't really give me the confidence about your understanding of the dynamics of how things are ton in san francisco or the different subject matters this commission takes up.

president breed has taken a great interest in the graffiti task force and has done a lot of work. passing legislation. issues penalties around this issue. i at that share the concerns. i represent the southeastern neighborhoods. they are affected by graffiti. i would love to see a more aggressive approach to punishment for graffiti artists that continue to deface both public and private property. i agree with mr. dillon it's not a police matter. police have their handsful. and it's hard to capture and prosecute graffiti artists. that means that the commission becomes even more -- the commission and task force becomes more relevant and important in this role.

that's all i have. >> i would say that for see the 17, i hear you soop viers cohen. for see the 17, the callfication is that person must represent the contracting agency for municipal railway shelters. so it's a pretty specific role, although generally speaking we'd love to have the previous experience, this calls for a representative from that particular company. >> fair enough, but that's -- >> you could speak during public comment, actually. supervisor mar. >> i'm in agreement with supervisor cohen on both issues of a local resident for see the 18 though i really appreciate miss lord's many years and vice chairmanship and years of service on the body and i agree with chair tang that it's basically the contracting agency for the municipal railway

shelters that the appointee for see the 17 and the ep enthusiasm and experience from miss landgraph is appreciated and i'll be supportive of you for that. i believe mr. dillon as the local resident with so much involvement in the mission and a lot of issues that he brought up. i appreciate of your watchdog approach and your g.i.s. and mapping effort to bring that to the body as well. >> thank you. so if there are no further questions, i'm going to open up item five to public comment. >> thank you. >> my name is jana lord. points ever claire if i case and comment. point of clarification on that large se seat. mrgs ta had two seats on the board and they were having

trouble filling both. we decided t decide consolidate and create. we were talking about a large seat before we discussed the would seats on the boord, then it became an issue they couldn't get a second person. we decided instead of creating an additional seat and keeping two mta seat, we let go of one mta. district that greg is from is represented by a resident of the city of san francisco. also, another thing is almost every single person on the board and we are ea talking about 25 members seat 17 has always been non-resident because of clear channel and seat 18. the board is well represented by residence. we allow everyone from the public to join our meeting.

that's how greg is involved. he comes to the meetings and given the opportunity to speak or provide input that can help us. he's more than welcome to help us on our sub committees and huddle conference that we're having in may. he can be involved, i just wanted to point out the clarification on seat 18. the original purpose was there are board members on -- there are seats on the board that are not necessarily represented by each district. what if that person who has been seriously involved is no longer a member of sfr we'd want to retain that person. academy of arts as well. she is ate reason that we considered the at-large member seat originally. >> thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> >> i wanted to say that. ♪ graffiti walls ♪ all look the same

12349 only the wright has been changed ♪ ♪ fix it up ♪ like a miracle ♪ a true blue ♪ spectacle ♪ miracle ♪ and pick a pick a good candidate ♪ ♪ won't you >> any members of public who wish to speak on item five. seeing none, public comment is now closed. >> if i may -- >> supervisor cohen. >> miss lord thank you for the explaining the seat at large for seat 18. it was actually -- it has softened my position. i will be supporting you. the reason why i'll support you is because you have strong recommendations from staff. and also, it's interesting. if the majority of body compli complies with san francisco, i think we can take a reverse perspective of diversity from

someone on outside coming in toe vied a different perspective. i value that. it's different from my normal thinking. usually i think san franciscans we have it all and figure it out and do the best. there might be some value in having two outsider, pardon the expression, and amy, i will be supporting your request to be placed in seat 17. thank you. >> supervisor mar. >> i'm shifting, again as first feeling that miss lord's continuity of the years of experience, but having two people so connected with clear channel, really one of the large corporations worries me. though i know miss lord has left the organization, i believe. i think we need neighborhood-based at advocate

advocates like mr. dillon to be represented. though i support miss lord for seat 17, i would support mr. dillon as a watchdog and experienced person who has been involved even though he's thot a member. i think it's important that we reward his governmen involvement on the body even though tees' not a member. it helps to empower him and the neighborhood he comes from as appointing another person from l lafayette on this body. >> obviously for seat 17, i'm in support of miss landgraph moving forward will. for seat 18, i have a preference for mr. dillon because he's attended meetings for the last would years even being not on the board. i'd love for him toen continue

on that board. nothing to take away from miss lord, she's done great things for the board. it's a matter of two seats with three applicants. >> i move miss landgraph for seat 17 and mr. dilling for seat 18. >> we take that without objection. congratulations. we can call item six now. >> item six is a hearing to consider three members ending january 21st, 2019 to the mental health board. >> we had to do a residency waiver, correct? >> yes. >> may we have a vote to rescind the vote for item five. for seat 17 we need a residentsy waiver. >> i second. >> thank you. now item six.

so we have three seats three applicants. angela wong and adelle wilson and [inaudible] are you hear? if you are hear, come on up. thawmption fothank you for your patience. >> thank you for the important decisions you're making. my goodness. good afternoon, supervisors i'm angela pawn. i'm seeking the appointment to the board as a family member of someone who is a consumer. mental illness. account the past five years, they have been very eye-opening, challenging, arduous, scary journey. my 27-year-old daughter was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. and she -- we've helped her with her struggle to recovery.

to survival. it's been, as i said, very frightening at times. so mental illness came out of nowhere. with no family history, no no one family history. we had no previous knowledge or education about all the ramifications of a diagnosis like this of mental illness. probably the same for those in the dark. we continue to be challenged as she learns to live under a new normal. which all the family members do. all her friend, all her communities. networks that she's volunteered a lot for. namely namy and dbsa who are

wonderful networks for us who don't know who to talk to or where to go and they're wonderful resources for the consumer, for the family members and for the community at large. i credit them largely for our sanity. i have no experience, actually, i'm not an expert in mental illness with all that i've tried to learn, what we've experienced. but i do want to say that our experiences, my experience i've gained with her bipolar disorder, her struggles has given me a sensitive perspective about the realm of mental illness. so i hope to possibly help

however i can. on the board. to positively impact those who also seek guidance and help. i have attended a meeting, and i know a bit of how it works although i've only attended the one so i have to put that up pront. i' -- up front. i'm here on behalf of my doctor because she said, mom, you need to be a family member on board. >> thank you. supervisor mar. >> i wanted to thank miss pawn for being willing to serve. having family members that are bipolar, having the groups like nami who are so helpful for families grappling with mental

illness. thank you for sharing your story. >> supervisor cohen. >> mrs. pawn, i too have family members active in nami. i wanted to ask you if you had any experience with attending previous meetings. >> with mental health board? >> yes, ma'am. >> yes i have. i attended one. but it gives me a good inkling into how things work and i hope that i can join some of the committees and try to help to bring along -- or better the existing projects and maybe bring to the forefront some really needed issues. projects address the issues. >> in your application, you list as a very interesting experience that you're retire retired from retire from ciezer in 2015.

your insight into the psychiatric department was insightful can you tell us what you saw? >> it was really ironic in hindsight when i took the transfer to psychiatry, i had no linkling of what was -- inkling of what was to come. i took it because it gave me 40 hours. i was part time and wanted to go full-time. >> what was your role? at kaiser? >> i was administrative assist tan. >> okay. thank you. >> i took on challenge not realizing what was to come. and so with what i learned there, and then to be hit with the diagnosis, my daughter's struggle, i don't know, it was meant to be, i hi. >> was your daughter diagnosed

during your time working why the psychiatry department? >> yes, the latter part part. then i transferred to determin dermatology. i wanted to go back but things didn't work out. >> you're now retired and ready to roll up your sleaves for the second part of your life. >> i thought what do i want to do when i grow up? i wanted something worthy. >> thank you for your interest. >> is adelle wilson here? do you want to explain adelle's -- >> i'm helen burke and i'm the executive director. i got a call from adelle. she wasn't feeling well. show has served a first timer term on the board adds a family

member and she's a valued member of the team. she chaired a committee in the past year to totally revamp our forms and the way we do site visits to the many programs to make them run smoothly and more effective. i hope you will consider reappointing her to a second term. >> thank you very much for letting us know. we did receive word from ulash dunlap who is a constituent. she was not able to extend teand. but i had met with her previously when her appointment was up as well. so, again, we have two people who are not here. at this time i think we're going to ep open up item six to public comment. >> yes, ma'am. commissioners, i'm sending a strong message that the medical team are low grade.

they're not effective in mental health problems. more than ever, the system [inaudible] forcing medications against the will of patients. they lock them up in hospital. and we have further control financially on the mental health patients. i'm a pi pioneer on eastern religious pathologies who are helping our people with mental and physical well-beings in addition of the methodologies. i put myself at the street level of chinatown hanging out with the chinese people, chinese folks if chinatown. almost every one of them fold up my paper [inaudible] of good planning for the

improvement formula for body and heart. i will continue my work on this pathway until such new studies will become the central core of applications for the system. one medical doctor in this chinatown, clinic actually [inaudible] my paper to the patient. my words were in chinese only but i'm trying to translate it into english. thank you very much. >> any other members of public item six. >> first, you might be up ♪ ♪ then you're down ♪ then you might be ♪ all around ♪ just like a yoa yo yo-yo ♪ ♪ just like a yo-yo ♪ there is one thing i want you

to do ♪ ♪ fix those mental health blues ♪ ♪ like a yo-yo ♪ and ring you can ring adelle ♪ ♪ ring adelle ♪ ding a dl ling ♪ ♪ you're looking swell adelle ♪ we can del ♪ make us well ♪ pick adelle ♪ pick adelle >> thank you very much. any other members of the public item six? seeing none, you be lick comments closed. >> i move approval of angela pawn for seat 14. ulash seat 15 and [inaudible]

seat 16. >> item seven is a hearing to appoint the term ending april 18th 2018. there is one seat and one applicant. >> is sufficientlyia deporto here? no. i see -- >> silia was hear this morning but had to leave. she had appointments with the judges around her cases. she wrote me a little bit of a note. she's currently deputy director of family services division and has been for the last three years. prior to that, she was the assistant director for children and family services. the department of public and soarnl services for riverside county. and then has spent 21 yers in child welfare in riverside. while in riverside, sylvia served as a commisi there

for two years. this is an appointed position by the head of aha. we have a an appointed member from human services agency from the public health department. her interest to serve is to focus on the development of a robust prevention system for the diversified age groups because she sees this entering san francisco at high rates. we feel like the work of first five is area aligned what she strifes to do. she'll value added. >> thank you for letting us know. >> supervisor mar. >> i wanted to thank the first five commission and all the staff for amazing work from

preschool for all the help equity work done from firth to five. i wanted to -- from birth to five. it's hard shoes to fill, but i know that trent roors appointment will be another great person on the first five commission. i know supervisor cohen served on first five also like i did. >> seeing no other questions or comments, public comment www.we'll open it up for item seven. seeing none, public comments closed. if we could get a motion to move sylvia deporto. we'll take that without objection. congratulations to sylvia. call item eight. >> hearing to consider appointing one member term ending october 19th 2017 to the eastern neighborhood citizen's

advisory compete. one seat, one applicant. >> is shrug bucktell here? thank you for waiting. >> good morning -- it's good afternoon, supervisors. thank you for having me here today and a special thanks to the office for putting me up for appointment. my name is [inaudible] bucktell, i work for the community street services. i believe i should be appointed to the eastern neighborhood citizen's advisory committee because of the unique and distinct perspective i can bring to the body. to me, the eastern neighborhoods are not just designated lines on a map. they exist at the same time as geographic and cultural segment of my life growing up and working professionally in san francisco. i don't just live and work in

the eastern neighborhoods, i was made there. i'm a product of d-6. i within the to elementary school in solma. my first official job was working near mission bay, and today, i'm in d-9 every single day workerring. when agencies present about street improvements and park improvement in the new parks, they're talking about the streets i've walked on for years. the parks, i hope to have my children play in one day. my current job adds the outreach and campaign engagement coordinator has allowed me to professionally work on many of the topics that eastern neighborhoods discuss and provides input on and votes on. every day, i'm involved in policy discussions with regarding land use which has become perhaps the most critical policy area in the entirety of this city. ground just broke at a new park

on 17 st. and folsom. this happened due to funds allocated by the eastern neighborhood cac. and our organization was there. when the connections between the mission and mission bay are completed, it will be the people i work with an work for who will be there. ful appoint, i thot onl -- not only intend to but promise that relevant thftion is brought back to community spaces. i will understand my rol role as a community organizer and member to make sure that my seat is the most grassroots-based seat on the committee and further more, i promise to review each project that comes through through the lens of not only those coming into the city but those coming here. i understand this appointment is not to be taken lightly. let me assure you on the record

that i pledge to be an active member of this committee if appointed. i take this with the utmost amount of seriousness, on this, you have my word. thank you. >> thank you very much. >> supervisor mar. >> i wanted to say to mr. bucta, i appreciate the passion that you bring. you talk about be rooted in district six, your commitment to organizing the neighborhood to speak for themselves and empower them, i appreciate that. joining others on the committee, giving that voice to this important eastern neighborhood, cac is so important. so much respect for your work empowering people from our neighborhoods. it's great to have you here. >> seeing no other members -- no other questions or comments from our committee, i'm going to open it up to public comment.

i have a couple of comment cards here. la tonya jones. [inaudible] marti martinez. >> i'm here to speak before you because i was scared to speak. this is one of the guys that will speaker it you but i have to speak for myself. i was the kind of person that was deciding i like to speak in front of people. i'm blessed to have [inaudible] as one the stets for the citizens. please, he is a good guy. he is the kind of guy you'll want on your board. thank you. >> please come on up. >> >> good afternoon, supervisors. [through the interpreter]

>> he says that i've been doing a lot of work with mission clab arive and with the lower street community services i'm here to support his appointment because he makes leaders out of us. nothing more than i want to share my support for him. thank you. >> thank you very much. any other members? come on up. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i'm cynthia citizen and i'm with sro collaborative and i'm with the internship. i'm here to support [inaudible]

for the appointment of citizen advisory. i've known terag for a number of years. not only him before before i got into th the internship. he's an silent outreach coordinator. not only is he an asset to the board but to the community in general. to appointment him would be a benefit to our community. not appointing sheeraz would be a loss. his work speaks for himself. >> thank you very much. any other members of the public? >> good afternoon, i'm dinea martinez. i work with the commission collaborative and dlor ez street community service as long with

chirrack bakta. what i've witnessed over the time that with we've spent working together is chirraz doing everything to educate himself on all sides of the issue. he not only looks toward the representatives from our community, and opinions of elected officials and people who have had a lot of experience if the situation, but he looks at the experiences of those of the most vulnerable populations of san francisco. those who don't always have the opportunity to share their voice. the immigrant populations, sro, low income populations. lgbtq members and people who are on disability or things that have nature. so it's really important to have somebody on this committee who has ties with people who are actually being affected most by

a lot of things that are happening in the city. he cares a lot about diversity and the effects on everybody in this city. and also, does so much research and a lot of thorough investigation to figure out historical context and important effects of projects. so thank you very much for hearing out what the community has to say about his appointment and i really think that it would be a great asset to this committee to have him. thank you. >> thank you very much. any other members of the public who wish to speak on item eight? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues. >> i move appointment to seat 1 of chirrazz bakta so seat 8. >> i support that. >> seconded by supervisor cohen. before we move on to item nine, we're going to tack a bit of a

recess, if we can meet back here at 2:00 if that works. thank you. we're in recess.

>> the office of controllers whistle blower program is how city employees and recipient sound the alarm an fraud address wait in city government charitable complaints results in investigation that improves the efficiency of city government that. >> you can below the what if anything, by assess though the club program website arrest call

4147 or 311 and stating you wishing to file and complaint point controller's office the charitable program also accepts complaints by e-mail or 0 folk you can file a complaint or provide contact information seen by whistle blower investigates some examples of issues to be recorded to the whistle blower program face of misuse of city government money equipment supplies or materials exposure activities by city clez deficiencies the quality and delivery of city government services waste and inefficient government practices when you submit a complaint to the charitable online complaint form you'll receive a unique

tracking number that inturgz to detector or determine in investigators need additional information by law the city employee that provide information to the whistle blower program are protected and an employer may not retaliate against an employee that is a whistle blower any employee that retaliates against another that employee is subjected up to including submittal employees that retaliate will personal be liable please visit the sf ethics.org and information on reporting retaliation that when fraud is loudly to continue it jeopardizes the level of service that city government can provide in you hear or see any dishelicopter behavior boy an employee please report it to say whistle blower program more information and the whistle

blower protections please seek www. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> shop and dine in the 49 promotes local biz and challenges the san franciscans to do their shop and dine in the 49 within the by supporting the services we help san francisco remain unique and successful and vibrant so where will you shop and dine in the 49 san francisco owes itch of the charm to the many neighborhoods people coma greet and meet it has an personality these neighborhoods are economic engine seeing the changes is a big deal to me especially being a san francisco native and it is important to support the local businesses but also a lot to over here it is nice not to have

to go downtown i think that is very important 0 for us to circulate our dollars the community before we bring them outside of the community for the time we have one dollars in the community is the better off we are it is about economic empowerment by apron ingress the businesses that are here. >> shopping local cuts down the cyber foot you'll find cookies and being transported the world where everything is manufactured and put on the assembly line having something local is meaning more the more we support our local businesses the more i

can walk down to where i need to be. >> bridges contingency bye like west portal it is about city and san francisco may have a big name but a small city and a lot of small communities shop and dine in the 49 highlighted that and reminded people come outburst and i love that about this city i'll always be a thur

>> thursday, march 24, disruptions of any kind. proceedings. and when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. i'd like to call roll at this time. commissioner president fong commissioner vice president richards commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner moore and commissioner wu we do expect commissioner hillis to arrive commissioners, the first item on your agenda consideration of items proposed for continuance ab downtown conditional use authorization at first street are proposed until april 7, 2016, item 2 the inclusionary housing

planning code is proposed middle july 14, 2016, no other items for continuance i have no speaker cards. >> any public comment on the items for the continuance calendars i don't see any public comment is closed. >> i'd like to ask for the intellectuals i understand you but payroll the first available date is july 14th. >> july 14th is not the first available date i believe the decision by the mayor's office of housing and community development for the conditional use authorization to allow the ballot measure to be decided on before the planning commission taking up this matter a r so they requested july 14th as the continuance the first project a

notification associated with that. >> okay. thank you and then i will move to continue the items to the dates requested. >> second. >> thank you, commissioners on that motion to continue all matters as proposed commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu and schematics and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you in commission matters consideration of the draft minutes for march 10, 2016. >> okay any public comment on the draft minutes. >> i don't see any public comment is closed. >> commissioner moore and move to approve. >> second. >> thank you, commissioners on that motion for the draft minutes commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson

commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner vice president richards commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 4 commissioners questions or comments. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i spoke with the secret and apparently we're now beginning to schedule items to come before us the month of july which is a long ways off and you know we have going to continue to have instances as we had today where large items are continued for one reason or another throb pushing other items further and furthers forward i'll propose to the commission see how thai feel sopping june 30th at a as a possible date i've heard from project sponsors and the general public comment about how long it will take to get on calendar is

might help to have an additional day available at the end of june to start the calendars for items. >> starts i understand your concern and things start to get continued slide that way as he get closer to the june 30th day we can reopen. >> within thirty days or whatever we have to do and two weeks before. >> two weeks. >> as long as we agendize in advance reinstate that meeting. >> commissioner moore. >> i ask we balance that with the director he's in charge of the rest of the department there needs to be a balance between those and very much appreciate

for that question from the director. >> did you want me - >> i mean, i think that is thank you for asking i mean, i'll check with the staff on that if it is 3 months in advance it gives us time to plan for it i'll say that staff including myself i'll not be here next week but the staff will travel around the 5 thursdays but if 3 months in advance gives us time to consider although i'll ask we notth not wait two or three weeks fifth story week before to know if there will be a meeting. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> in yesterday's new york

times it caught my attention housing roles by the mayor and new york was in discussion of a density bonus onsite affordable housing interesting enough they're planning looks like it will go through it passes the council to set aside 20 to thirty percent for all new units for the rezoning district on the density and the target population for those 20 to thirty people people making between thirty and 40 percent medium income. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further, we'll move on to to item 5 under droument. >> thank you jonas commissioners, i want to briefly update you on the mission 2020

strategy we've had robust meeting on all aspects your schedule for an informational update on may 5th we'll be talking about the strategy with the first large public meeting april '62 weeks if yesterday we'll get the specifics on that the strategy has a lot of facets only some of which relate to the planning code changes a lot of have has to do with with the retaining population and the controllers we forwarded for the first time a series of meeting both the members of the community and the developers that are active the neighborhood and other interested members so that we're having a dialogue frankly on both sides of the table that often don't august that is productive and we've got a series of discussions to have

more open communication between points of view on those issues we're planning on getting to you on may 5th but on april of a meeting the primary goal to set priorities of this long list of strategies we've developed probably three or four dozen strategies we can't do them all at once but prioritize we'll moved in the next couple of years we'll send the announcement on the 6 and look forward to being here on the 6 thank you. >> thank you. >> commissioners item 6 past events on the board of supervisors the historic preservation commission didn't meet yesterday. >> good evening aaron star at that land use committee they heard the landmark designation an marcus avenue staff provided

an overview and respond to questions one speaker named faith at the end of public comment supervisor peskin moved the comments be recommended that motion carried unanimously at the full board the supervisors considered supervisor avalos ordinance that will increase the tsf busy $2 on large project authorization the board passed this on the second reading a few weeks ago been on march 11 the mayor vetoed it in order to override they need 8 votes it only received 6 votes in supervisor wiener and supervisor cowen and others and supervisor farrell was absent one introduction of note this week by supervisor yee as the planning code amendment to amend the dwelling unit required

zoning district without density controls that concludes my presentation. >> commissioner antonini. >> oh, yeah mr. starr thank you for your report as always one 171 san marcus that is in forest hill maybe apprised us of the situation. >> ask historic preservation commission to extend you u send you the designation that was a modern 1940 that was designated for the architecture but i'm sorry, i would was not part of discussion we'll get you information. >> commissioner vice president richards. >> mr. starr if you could the supervisor yee's introduction could you explain a little bit what he has around the use requirements. >> we require a percentage of

the apartments to be bedrooms and some three bedrooms it allows the flexibilities to give credit for four bedrooms and up. >> thank you. >> commissioners, if there's nothing further, we'll move on to move on to general public comment not to exceed 15 minutes at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when reached in the meeting. each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. i do have several speaker cards. >> (calling names). >> good morning, commissioners i'm jim as you recall i spoke before you a month or two ago after your staff made a presentation regarding the civic

center realm plan i shared you with a letter to the rec and park commission that appointment their neglect of the plaza for 50 years that neglect and ignorance is more pervasive last year the citizen annual the aa charter noted it and form of the celebration that was held for city hall treated it as a prestanding building not related to a carefully planned civic center the most complete in the country during any many years of working on the civic center api i've examined whether available in writing about the civic center and there's not much that is available generally a.d. actuated and immature and perhaps full of errors not my intention to write this about

the civic center but having searched and offered motorbike none wanted to take it on a number of years ago i decided to try my hand at that with the help of the san francisco museum and historical society arresting not i've published in 3 sections that i have bound and made available to you on the sacramento cover the section is the most recent i sent it to the mayor with a cover letter i make two points one that is sort of random information nobody is really known about civic center is a product of that an mask exposition company the james ralph ran for mayor and through him create the civic center that

is basically, the second dimension of the i key it was not referred to last year the celebration of the pc i e and so forth but not gotten into any of the resist parts and ralph provided the leadership to build the civic center a master planner which is john howard that seems to be left out of the public remembrances and people think that the civic center was that developed by daniel when was dead at that time, and he is the man who designed civic center place city hall and ran the competition for city hall and supervised the architect and really is the man most responsible i bring this document to you hopes you'll read it be the positive force in is civic center to the grander it should

be thank you. >> good afternoon osie with the charm so i'm here to voice our concerns about a new trend in the neighborhood noah valley the proliferation of the duplex if so a couple of years fighting monster homes and it seems to me the developers are sensing the favorable climate for adding to the housing stock and using that to push the same out of scale out of character homes that are basically a menace to our quality of life but under the invoice of adding to the city housing stock so later i was in a post application meeting believe it or not it is new to me i know the preapplication meeting organized by the developer and project sponsor

and they were going through the plans for transforming this little small house in noah valley to a 5 thousand plus square feet and on top of they were going to transfer a garden shed to auxiliary use we questioned the legitimate and said this is something approved by supervisor wiener and mayor ed lee and objective the intent of the whatever has been pass at adu is not for people to change their garden sheriff's deputy to in-law unit that the points out to the enormity of the problem not only the arc changing take instead of building monster homes there was a backlash but moving to monster duplexes but

taking every bit of what exists in the backyard and storage and garden sheriff's office to pass it as in-law unit liveable space my question to you is when is this city going to update the planning code and giles to deal with that out of scale and out of character development and construction because to use it didn't matter if so it a single-family home or the other duplex that is enormous and a mention us to our quality of life every week almost you are here to hear or approve multi unit projects today, i have one before you one and 60 units those units are no more than a thousand square feet some are seven hundred feet why is it

okay for the western neighborhoods to bear the brunts of 2 thousand plus square feet it is not right. i urge you to change the code or is guidelines to help us that's it thank you very much. >> is there any general public comment okay i don't see any public comment is closed. >> commissioner vice president richards one item to note my understanding of the adu legislation was it had to stay within the envelope of the existing building. >> commissioners commissioners, if there's nothing further, we'll move on to to our regular calendar item 7 for case planning code sections this is a planning code amendment. >> thank you

tina changing with the approval of the block alley and rooftop screening and inclusionary code and to make finding make an adopted finding under the sections mention the general plan that will result in application of the mid block alley control as applicable and to adjacent districts with the fillmore and fulsome street and rc d once the ordinance is made on march 3 this is both controlled for the sections will now apply to building that have alley frontage rather than just street frontage they, of course, have to have the frontage on more than two hundred feet and length the promoted amendment will allow no more flexibility of the closure with the design review allowing the maximize permitted

height up to 100 percent of the roof area today, the department got one letter the department recommends the commission recommend to the board of supervisors with the planning code to sections and make an adopted finding under the planning code section and the general plan that concludes my presentation. and i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> project sponsor please. no project sponsor. >> is there any public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed commissioner moore. >> ms. thanking one question i think that goes to when we - this includes the removal of obsolete equipment on the roof

prior to permitting any new this is something we've discussed but might be referenced in this decision. >> this didn't discuss the removal or existing equipment it is more talking about the screening of equipment for proposed new construction however, i suppose that the closure will be proposed for existing building not fiscal the removal of new commit equipment. >> the adding of new equipment that means replacement and new equipment to acknowledge the changes i wanted to see cross referenced all new equipment will have to be removed once we start to exchange or remove

equipment to exchange equipment add new equipment a cross-reference to some provisions old equipment has to be removed. >> it there the legislation didn't touch the equipment only the screening of the equipment mechanical equipment chronicles the mechanical equipment on roofs didn't change whatsoever and it not touch the equipment. >> i think the xishgsz is suggesting we add a provision that seems we could probably do that within the context of this legislation that legislation can apply it to existing buildings; right? >> i suppose. >> so the suggestion is simply adding a provision when the closures occur the old equipment be removed that is doable.

>> oh, sure okay got it thanks. >> knott's berry farm. >> hi sorry i'm still kate dlul maybe i suggest the staff seize the envision is elsewhere we have one we just passed some changes that would require 10 year reapprovals of mechanical equipment for failure equipment that includes the need to remove old equipment if it is obsolete and in addition even before that we also looked at some rule changes that make it so if you're going to - asking for a new cu you have to take old equipment before you, implement the equipment on new buildings we have a couple of ways to address that i want to make sure

we're not crossing wires ensue i go agree with exposure that if we are covered there. >> i may remind the commission when we discussed hospitals which have a special stand-offs not for the first time that was adopted to equipment and changing equipment but now we're puppy want to see a general reluctant to codify somethings. >> i remember the conversation around hospital equipment i think we passed something in regards to equipment in general i can't remember if it was an official planning code change or who it was unofficial if if you're applying for a cu property you're looking you have to agree to take out the old equipment. >> it is related to cellular

tenants i don't recall the other legislation by i think that was for macro and micro but i can't remember. >> we'll make sure there is consistentcy the code. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. abdomen of clarification from reading the report that legislation in eermentsz south of market, mixed use and south of market c-3. >> it is. >> the only areas not have a bearing on the areas north of market. >> sorry the mid block alley controls only applied to those districts and the ones that are adam so correct north of market and the c-3 the alley controls will not apply and on the clarification of the 60 percent open to the sky we have those discussions often for the benefit of the public and for us

to just means any addition to an existing building under new construction can't block the sunlight. >> so within the block alley has to meet for example, it must be 20 feet wide and for that entire portion of the mid block alley unless the 60 percent open to the sky 40 percent can be covered after a 15 foot head height clearance there could be building within the members of the public may address the san francisco local agency formation commission up to 40ers of the mid block alley does that make sense and so if. >> we're talking about covering something the alley or the shade the alley. >> permitted obstruction for like bay windows and balconies and things like that would be permit as long as they were not provided within 15 feet of first

15 feet of height in the mid block alley but after that a building or a covering could theoretically be mrs. is the mid block alley if it didn't cover anymo 60 percent. >> rather than a - >> it would be a big bay over 40 percent of the bay. >> if it was a bay window not complying with section 46 if it has to comply that the regulations and controls for permitted obstructions but the code allows for some buildings to be within the mid block alley. >> okay. thank you i understand. >> commissioner moore. >> i also spoken.

>> is commissioner vice president richards. >> move to approve. >> second. >> yeah. is that do you want to make that amendment. >> yes. that will be amended to add a what are we are doing. >> recommend. >> to recommend adding a provision that out-of-date or out mooted equipment has to be removed bringing before. >> correct. >> thank you commissioners commissioner vice president richards and commissioner johnson a motion for a recommendations for approval of the planning code as amended to include looking at obsolete equipment it's removal. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner vice president richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 8

for case market street this is a conditional use authorization. >> oh, are we missing someone. >> staff is on the way can we take items out of order. >> solute commissioners, if the staff for items 8 ab can prepare herself for her presentation the commission is ready for you commissioners will be taking 9 ab out of order however, i don't see the zoning administrator here. >> okay. hang on.

>> he should be here for the second part of this matter. >> let's take a 5 minute break thank