>> and want to thank supervisor wiener our castro merchant and residents all of our agencies for being here this morning of course, this is a scheduled presentation of our neighborhood fix it programs that we want to announce before i begin i want to say that i'll be here briefly because another trample has occurred in our city been an officer-involved shooting in the bayview i have to get back to the office and pay attention and get all the facts but every incident in our city regarding an officer-involved shooting is a tragedy and one we're from the mist of reforms for the police department making sure that everybody is safe but whatever

an incident of on officer-involved shooting we want to make sure that that we understand and whether or not it fits both our reforms and why on officer will be required to use his or her weapon in heir circumstance i know your communities of san francisco everyone wants to better understand to move on the santa sanctity of life the most important policy in the police department so i simultaneously right now chief suhr that providing information to the people there in the bayview on what happened i don't have all the circumstances by do know that involved an individual that was in a stolen vehicle but at the same time whether or not it required the use of deadly force

is something we need to look at very, very specifically with the promise that our police department is improving it's policies and should take life only when other lives are in danger and that's where the circumstances have to be reviewed specifically ufb i'm upset about that because i take all the officer-involved shootings very sorrowful on behalf of everyone in the city and want everyone to know that that the purpose of this gathering today is to really keep our neighborhoods safe and clean with the tremendous amount of involvement we have and i don't want to ever loss it theme to make sure the city is safe and clean for everybody so let me spend a moment only simply thanking all the people

hear our officers and muni, our pit stop monitor and volunteers as well as our departments 311, public works, public utilities commission commission the homeless outreach teams that are working with the merchants association with the cb d and castro all the groups that supervisor wiener and i have been lucky to go work within others past are beginning to come together on at least this immediate treatment of 5 neighborhood corridors in the city corridors that will we believe not only needs this immediate almost eco implies that mohammed nuru if dpw calls it we come in and try to fix things whether or not broken signs or faded out crosswalks or damaged things on the streets

that don't work or anything that might make residents visitors, merchants and others feel unsafe in their neighborhoods needs to be fixed the assembly will be better coordinate under if program i've directed all the parks including the rec and park department and departments we nominated working together to make sure that we fix that's why the fix it teams are announced under the directorship of sandra a very veteran, if you will, within our public works department and have my authority as the mayor to coordinate the departments and get them at a maintenance level when we fix

things to maintain them great places like the castro where i often go or mission geneva or chinatown or fillmore all going to be part of these initial 5 neighborhoods in the next 3 years with the budget we have planning and hopefully gets approved in working with the board will be over $6 million to public works to make sure they do their job in cleaning but all the other departments that have access to the streets will collaborate in fixing the platform at the 311 calling center where we have a lot of people logan in but not know if, in fact, things are fixed sometimes they are and sometimes needs refixing that's the announcement today, i wanted to again thank the two pit stops

monitor herman and another individual you delayed you were doing our job people call out for help recently you were there in preventing a robbery from happening thank you for those who step up to help others this is what the teamwork is an embracement of a team to keep the corridors we value to be kept clean and safe and more liveable but to keep up oftentimes i'm also sometimes do it i'll come in with a parachute of people to do something we leave and great moment how about next week and the week after how to keep this up this is what the fix it teams are doing make sure

that the public health department outreach workers are here part of team we have challenges on our streets with certain individuals who make take the opportunity and not using the pit stops and make sure that everybody is feeling safe i thought want to make that announcement and make sure you know that i wanted to celebrate but keep it going for the merchants that oftentimes are facing other challenges about the corridors for not only their driving but for all the residents and so forth but with that, i need to get back not only to the office but the ongoing conversations with the police chief and the community advocates that are concerned about the officer-involved shooting hope you understand that it is a serious thing for the city i

take it seriously we will have today or the next few days a clarification of what has happened and a response to it but thrill tell you it is very uneasy and tragedy to have an individual die on officer-involved shooting and we just need to make sure quarry doing all the right thing to prevent that from happening thank you very much. >> (inaudible). >> well, you know again, i think we'll have to ask a lot of questions excluding that and are the officers following the protocol what were the circumstances that led up to it we're trying to con stringent a circumstance in which an officer uses his or her gun that lethal force had not been at the center of attention for so many months

i have internal listed if on ever shooting that happened and make sure that everybody is following the protocols in circumstances was that officers life challenged in any way were other people's lives champed in any way those circumstances have to be looked at i need every single officer who carries a gun and authorized to use it only do that has a late result this and many other questions will be under review. >> he's at the top i'll be meeting to see what occurred obviously i have to hold the chief accountable and especially, when an officer-involved shooting is the circumstance. >> thank you.

>> thank you. >> sandra i'm the fix it director justice wanted to thank mayor ed lee for his leadership the neighborhood promise is important to our mayor and city i'm grateful the mayor has trusted me to execute this initiate for the visits and residents i'm planning to work act a team with all the city agencies to get it done so i'm looking forward to working with everyone but today, i'm honored to be joined by a strong neighborhood advocate not only in this neighborhood but citywide please welcome supervisor wiener. >> (clapping.) >> can question get this taller? >> okay. i'll get the tall ignite mike so first of all, i wanted to

really recognize herman and dashaun those are dpw employees that are pit stop workers that help to keep your neighborhoods clean up and our public restrooms clean and usable thou for your work and they disrupted a robbery at the chevron we have approval of the minutes inform thank y thank you. your heroic effort.

>> (clapping.) >> and he really wanted want to thank mayor ed lee for this upcoming budget to really help to improve our neighborhood and increase cleaning and your ability to ronald to graffiti and broken street lights all the things that degrade the quality of life in a neighborhood it is incredibly important we'll also be able to step up the city's response in terms of entering departmental work to try to contribution people out of the homeless encampments into shuttle and housing and having that entering departmental with the outreach team with the police and department of public works and all people to get people off the streets we know those encampments that are inhuman for people in them are

really unhealthy and unsafe for right down the street an 16th street a resounding occurring problem and need to keep our neighborhoods clean and people safe and grateful that the mayor and i hope the board will keep our commitment to the people of san francisco to restaff our police department our police department staffing collapsed just as the city was growing sixth we've been aggressively funding police academy scomplaz to restaff the department so we have more beat officers keeping our neighborhood safe and officers with traffic enforcement people need to feel safe to the mayor is proposing 7 police mainstreamed classes might be close to a record and working hard to make sure that

the budget we've passed actually includes the 78 police academy a classes towards the full staffing and have the police officers we need to have a city that is safe r safe for everyone i want to thank all the departments i know you'll do amazing work in executing in in a humane way that keeps our neighborhood safe and clean thank you very much. >> (clapping.) >> thank you supervisor wiener 311 is the city's non-emergency number here today from 311 our 311 director nancy and morning everyone. >> (clapping.) >> i'm excited about this program again, a way of helping

customers get things done and 311 is really our easy way to connect to government we can connect you by phone or web, by using our mobile aps a technology in particular has become really in high demand as of april of 2016 we actually saw 60 percent of our requests coming in through web or mobile that sewer placed phone calls so it shows the demand of technology for our customers we are introducing our new website which is my sf 311.org my sf 311.org we want to make sure that people can easily log in requests and create accounts and actually text the history of requests and they can submit requests in a single contributor page if you have facebook or

google link to that you don't have to be remembering more passwords and 311 is our partner with all of the departments within the city so this is the best way of making sure you report our issues and we can provide very robust reporting that will assist sandra in getting things done a reminder of that. >> thank you nancy the strange and enduring character of our neighborhood lies in the community synonym that know that more than i had a local retained and local business owner and after school merchant president dan. >> thank you we're grateful to the mayor and the departments for coming out and do some spit

shining in the neighborhood and it is appreciated so thank you all and thanks to those guys that did a bang up job for the neighborhood. >> (clapping.) >> okay. that concludes the neighborhood promise announcements thank you, >> if you are interested in our local city government and would like to work with 18 other

enthusiastic citizens committed to improving its operations, i encoura >> good morning and welcome to san francisco board of supervises budget and finance committee meeting for may 25, 2016. i'm mark farrell and clar and joined by supervisor katy tang as well as jane kim. we will be

joined by norman yee and scott wiener. want to thank lichbda wong and jessie [inaudible] charles kremenak from sfgtv. >> silence cell phones and leck trainic devices. documents should be submit today the clerk. items will appear on june 7, board of supervises agenda unless otherwise stated. >> colleagues we have a lengthy ajendsa. >> item 1, resolution approving agreement between state and city combined city project including pedestrian safety, transit impruchbments andue fillty upgrades. >> shannon karen from san francisco public works. i'm here to seek approval for public works to

intr into agreement can caltrans to 19th avenue. this project features pedestrian and transit curb extensions as well as water and sewer infrastructure improvements. the project extends along 19th avenue which is state route 1 from [inaudible] to lincoln way. the agreement is prerequisite for caltrans. the agreement specifies the responsibility of the city and caltrans in executing the project. the city is the implementing agency fraall phases of the project. caltrans is responsible for providing quality assurance and permit after accepting the plans, specifications and estimate package, the right of way certification, fundsing certification. no funds are exchanged. public

works order march 21, 2015 dweckter of public work recommends approve the agreement to sign the agreement on behalf of the city. happy to answer any questions. >> thank you very much. any questions. moouv to pub lic comment. anybody wish to comment on item 1? seeing none, public comment is closed >> like to send iletm 1 to full board with positive recommendation >> motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim without objection. >> item 2 resolution approving the one permanent easement to mu deso for $35 thousand paid by jwgmic heny to bide nl a portion of mchenry avenue. >> thank you very much. >> good morning. my name is tony borto the assistant real estate director of

san francisco public utilities commission. the action before you have is a resolution a easement to modesto paid by jwg mchenry. in addition the resolution also reflects adoption of several funings include ceqa findings, a findsing the conveyance and respect to code 23.3 the find thofg sale of ineasement through a competitive bidding prauls is impractical. the resolution authorizes the director of property or general manager to execute and modify agreements in furtherance of this resolution. i want to

just-there is-qul i have a drawing that shows what we are talking about. this is mchenry avenue in modesto. these lines here mark the puc's right of way boundaries. under subservice the puc has 3 high pressure water lines and under ground voltage lines. the area is in question is the squiggling box. it is the area the developer needs to expand and widen mchenry avenue. when the city of modesto approved this development which is here and here, they required the developer to widen mchenry avenue. they need a little of our right of way to widen the highway. sfpuc

staff and caltrans and modesto reviewed and approved the plan for street improvements includes a subsurface bridge to protect the pipeline. july 14, 2015 the san francisco public utilities commission authorize said agreement for the sale of the easement. modesto city manager executed this agroument and the city of mu odesto accepted the improvements and an agreement with caltrans. jwg mchenry provided an appraisal dated in 2014 and updated june 4, 2016 fair market value at $35 thousand. the appraisal was approved by the cities director of real propertyment we ask the board to adopt this resolution and the related

findings. >> thank you very much. colleagues, any questions for the puc? okay, seeing none move to public comment. anyone wish to comment on item 2? seeing none, public comment is closed. entertain a motion? >> move with positive recommendation to full board. >> motion by supervisor yee and second by supervisor tang and take that without objection. >> item 3 resolution [inaudible] authorizing the director of mayors office of housing [inaudible] allocation committee to permit the revenue baunz in a principle amount not to exceed $50 million 455 fell street. item 4, [inaudible] no cost for aumgz of 6 months until december 31,

20s 17. &thank you >> don lusty, senior project manager. before you today are two resolution related to financing and ground lease for new 100 percent affordable fomly housing development located at 455 fell street also known as central freeway parcel o in hayes valley. the first resolution is bonds [inaudible] authorizing the city to submit a application for bond financing not to exceed $56 million used for construction financing. the second resolution authorizes the city to enter into ground lease where the project is built. provides the terms for ground lease that includes 75 year lease term with extension option for additional 24 years annual rent of 10

percent of fair market value determined by a third party appraisal with annual base rent payments structured as $15 thousand annually and the balance payable to the extent proceeds a available from project cash flows. approval of both resolutions is required for the [inaudible] bond application [inaudible] june 14, it is important to note the baunz are financing obligations which don't require the city to place any money to repay the bond. briefly, the project will be located at 455 fell as i mentioned earlier. will be a new 100 percent affordal rental housing development in san francisco hayes valley neighborhood to be financed with tax ex. bonds 4 percent tax credits and

[inaudible] state department of housing and community development and [inaudible] funds from the federal home loan bank, a permanent mortjudge and funding from the city. the development will consist of 180 family units earning betwoot 40 and scith percent of ami included a 30 percent set aside for formally homeless families. to be built on the largest remaining freeway parcel, the project is owned by mercy housing and san francisco housing development corporation and include 1200 square feet of retail space on the ground floor, a large central landsscape court yard, roof top open space, community garden, office space for supportive service and on site daycare. provide housing for low income families and formally homeless. we are

available to answer questions. >> thank you very much. any questions on 3 or 4? we move to public comment. anybody wish to comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> like to make a motion to send item 3 and 4 for positive recommendation >> we take that without objection. >> item 5, resolution declaring intent the city to [inaudible] directorf mayors office of housing and community development to submit application to allocation committee to permit issuance of moorejudge revenue bond not to exseat $140 million for 2070 folsom street. item 7, [inaudible] locate td at 2070 folsom street

>> thank you very much. mayors office of housing and community development is back. >> good morning supervisors. i am ann romarrow project manager. i will present resolutions related to financing and option to ground lease of family housing development in the mission located near 17th and folsom street. the first is tax exempt bond which authorizes the silty to submit for bond finances in a amount not to exceed $140 million. the second resolution authorizes the city to enter into ground lease with city owned parcel where the project will be built. mission economic development agency and chinatown community development were selected to develop the

city and it is ideal for housing, it faces south to a park under construction on 17th and folsom. the project includes up to 139 units of affordable housing over ground floor using facing the park and include 20 percent set aside for homeless or at risk transitional age use. also includes a hub on the ground floor that include license childcare and youth after school programs and services, leadership programs and ground floor cafe with public restrooms. we request approval to authorize the skity to apply for the bond allocation and will return to the board to request-issue the bonds in late 2017 when the project is ready for construction. the bonds a conduit finances only. apply to the

the bond allocation the developer must demonstrate site control which is achieved by a option to ground lease the site. the option leads to the ground lease with standard city terms. that is the term of 75 years with extension option for additional 24 years and annual rent of 10 percent of fair market value with base rent in the amount of $15,000 a year. the project will provide needed affordable housing for families and homeless transitional age youth in the mission with ground floor uses and recommend approval. we have representatives from the sponsor here if and center questions for them. >> thank you. colleagues, any questions? okay. seeing none open up to public comment. public comment is closed. motion to send the item forward? >> motion to pass to full board. >> motion by supervisor yee and

second by supervisor tang. >> item 7, resolution declaring intent of the city to expenditures from proceeds of future bond indetedness and mayors office of housing and community development to submit a application to california debt limit allocation committee to permit the issuance of rez sidential bond not to exceed $225 million. item 8, declaring intent of the city to [inaudible] submit a application to the california debt limit allocation city to permit the issuance of residential bond in amount not to exceed $240 million for 1601 mariposa street. >> thank you very much. >> good morning, my name is

adam cray and bond program manager for housing and community development. here to present resolutions for two affordable housing projects. these resolutions authorize the city submit a application to california debt limit allocation committee. when bonds are authorized they will be issued as conduit debt and nolt require the city to pledge funds to repay of the bonds. the first project 5th and howard consist of 263 below market rate units and 100 percent affordable and mixed income building located at 921 howard street. the below market rates units serve those not earning more than 50 percent ami. the second project, will be 299 one unit mixed income project located at

1601 mariposa. 60 units serve very low income house holds and a portion will be reserved for houses earning no more than 40 percent of ami and the balance is reserved for those earning no more than 50 percent ami. both of the projects the sponsors plan to submit an application to the california debt limit allocation within 4 weeks. here is representatives fraup tenderloin development and [inaudible] on behalf of the sponsors like to thank you for the consideration and look forward to your support for the very important projects. >> thank you very much. any question for staff on 7 or 8? we move to public comment? anybody wish to comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> motion to move forward item

7 and 8 to full board with positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor tang and take that without objection. >> is there a second? >> second by supervisor yee without objection. >> with that, call item number 9 please. >> hearing on the cities financial position and requesting the mayors budget director and budget and legislative analyst and controller to report. >> okay, thank you very much. this is a item colleagues we have as a standing item and don't have anything to work on this week so we will continue this. continue to the call of the chair but will take public comment. anyone wish to comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee without objection. we will do a few out of order, calls item 12-14. >> item 12, ordinance appropriating $207 million to mta for

transportation projects and equipment. 13, resolution authorizing the sale issuance and execution of one or more series mta revenue bonds in amount not to exceed $207 million. item number 14, ordinance appropriating approximately $6 million oo support planning design and outreach for capital improvement projethwith golden state warrior [inaudible] >> thank you very much. we have [inaudible] >> good morning, thank you for hearing these 3 items. item 12 and 13 are related to the next sear as of revenue bonds which we are seeking approval of the ordinance and resolution. we propose to seek approval of $190 million fund, light-rail vehicle procurement and [inaudible] mission bay capital improvement. the fund

is $190 million and 1070 mill ynl for light-rail, 48 million for van ness bart and [inaudible] capital improvements. the light-rail vehicle is one of our largest projects and we vavariety of funding sources to help fund the new light-rail vehicles. the revenue bonds are a portion of the funding sources and same is true of van nessbert projth. i want to thank you debia newman from budget analyst, did a great job summarizing the bonds. don't want to bore you details s, so if you have questions happy to answer them. >> any questions right now? okay, mr. rose can we go to your reports, please? >> yes, mr. chairman and members. on page 7 of our report we report

that the estimated total debt service over 30 years is approximately-i'm on item 12-the debt services is 385.4 million of which 178.4 is interest and 207 million principle. the bonds will add between 11 million to 16 million in debt service. on page 8, we note that the sfmta will repay the bonds from gross annual revenues which total 626 million312 thousand in 15-16 and that is table 7 on page 8 of the report. we recommend you approve the proposed resolution and ordinance. regarding item 14 , on page 13 of our

report we note that according to the controllers office when the warriors purchased the 11 acres from sales force in 2015 the sales transaction generated 3, -that results in 3 million 50 thousand to mission bay fund. $350 thousand for sfmta increased base line for total $3.4 million so that one time transfer provides the source of revenues, 3.4 million for appropriation for

arena capital improvement for fy 15-16 and that is shown on table 1 of page 5 the report. sales tax and gross receipts tax totaling approximately 2, $310 thousand are projected to be generated for construction the warriors areney in fy 17-18. $270 thousand is base line allocation from the sales and gross receipts tax revenues. provide a total source of revenues [inaudible] and again that is shown on table 1. all of the revenues in the supplemental if they are not generated by warriors sale tax and gross receipts tax is the city

general fund would fund a difference so want to note that is a possibility. on page 14 of our report, over 5 year period as shown in table 2 on that page 14, even with the anticipatedgeneral funds contributions to transfer taxes and construction gross receipts taxes and sales taxes, the sfmta will face a revenue shortfall of 34, 508, 573. sfmta anticipates funding the sort fall through revenue bonds and that was the prior item that we just reviewed. as shown in file 6604 and 160465. request approval not to exceed [inaudible] which includes 35 million of

mission bay transportation capital improvement. the $35 million in the prior item would funds this $34.5 million projected shortfall. we note according to the the report from the direct of transportation, sfmta will be able to deliver transit service to the the warriors project, sfmta can not guarantee future finding for the transit service to the warriors project. accord toog the director of transportation, sfmta supports the warrior project understanding the city, golden state warriors and sfmta don't expect adverse impact associated with implementing the transit service plan

and capital investment to support the warriors project and recommend you approve the ord nnss. >> thank you. any questions on items 12-14. seeing none we will open to public comment. anybody wish to comment on items 12-14? seeing none public comment is closed. any questions or comments at this time? >> like to the make a motion to send forth 12-14 to full board with positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim and take that without objection. item 10 and 11. >> item 10, budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimates received and estimates expenditures for departments as och may 2, 2016. item 11, annual salary ordinance proposed budget and appropriation

ordinance for selected department as of may 2, 2016 for fy 2016-17 and 2017 to 18. >> colleagues these are departmental budgets we started to hear. we will go through a number of them now and start with department of environment. we will not do that. we will move on. is retirement here? jake huish? come on up. mr. rose, we want to go to your report? >> why don't you let the department go first and we'll comment. >> good morning. pleasure to be back here. we have reached agreement with the budget analyst office related to adjustments they are recommending to this committee on department budget and would like to take the opportunity to thank the committee as well as

budget analyst office and mayors budget office for supporting the budget for us to fulfill or mission and with that, happy to answer question. >> thank you very much. >> mr. chairman and members, now i'm referring to the separate budget analysis report on the budget. on page 42 of the report we note that our recommended reduction to the budget total 616, 503. still low a increase of of 6.5 percent in fy 16-17 budget. the budget total 576, 097 in 17-18. the reduction uzalone increase of 161, 335 or 6/10 of a percent. the

department concurs with our reductions which is shown on pages 43 and 44 of our report. glad to answer any questions. >> thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions for mr. rose or huish? thank you very much. colleagues can i entertain a motion to assessment these budget analyst recommendations pending public comment? >> so moved. >> motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor yee. we take that without objection. i want to make sure as we start budget season this is the first one we do this appropriately or is there another method? >> john gibbener, today we take comment on item 10 and 11 and recommend the committee take the motions but not vote on them until after public comment and when public comment is done adopt. >> okay. fair enough. madam

clerk motion to resend the previous- >> motion to resend. >> motion by sfr visor tang and second by supervisor yee without objection and entertain a motion to accept the recommendations after-public comment. thank you very much. department of the environment here yet by chance? no problem. >> my apologies for the timing error. debbie rafael department of environment and are pleased to say we are in agreement with budget analyst recommendation and accept their changes. >> thank you very much. mr. rose why don't we go to your report. >> on page 2 of the report the recommended reductions-page 18 of the report, sorry. our recommended reductions to the budget total 102, 633. 16-17. 92, 918 are on

going savings and 9, 750 are 1 time. allow increase of [inaudible] or 6.9 percent in the department 16-17 budget. [inaudible] all those monies are on pm going savings and as i understand the department concurs with our recommendation, and any further questions or comments? thank you for coming to agreement. we will entertain that after public comment. next we have bbi. am hui. >> good morning supervisors. tom hui director of department building inspection. we are in agreement with

budget analyst. thank you for them to work with us closely on this budget. if you center any question we can answer it. >> thank you very much mr. hui. >> mr. chairman, members on page 11 of our report our recommended reductions to the budget total 4, 393, 815 in 16-17. of that amount 4, 324, 815 are on going savings and 69,000 are 1 time. total [inaudible] all of which are on going savings and as i understand it the department concurwise recommended reductions and details are shown on pages 12-squaen 16 of the report. >> any questions or comments for dbi or budget analyst? okay, thank you very much for being here.

>> good morning megan wallace from port of san francisco and we are in full agreement with the budget and legislative analyst recommendation. >> this is going smooth. mr. rose can we get a report, please? >> yes. on page 21 of our report our recommended reductions to the budget total 505, 208 in 16-17 all are ongoing savings and allow increase of [inaudible] to 23 percent of the 16-17 budget. the bulk of that are capital improvements that is quhie you see a huge increase in the budget. in addition we recommend closing out prior year unexpending incumbences of

95, 185. those are on page 23 of the report. regarding fiscal year 17-18 the recommended reductions to the budget total 528, 504 all are on going savings and department concurs with the reductions shown on pages 22 and 23. >> colleagues any questions? thank you for being here. up next we have our library. madam clerk, would you call item 22 out of order? >> item 22 ordinance appropriating 7.6 million for general reserve for public library and [inaudible] fiscal 15-16. >> good mornling supervisors regarding the fy 17 and 18 budget we reached

agreement with budget analyst and want to thank [inaudible] mr. rose. we agreed with the reductions proposed. >> thank you very much. mr. rose can we go to your report, please? >> mr. chairman and members, on page 25 of our report our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total 680, 277 in fy 16-17. 664, 527 are on going, 15, 750 are one time. the reductions allow increase of 6, 421 [inaudible] 5.1 percent in the budget. we also recommend that 1, 772, 592 for property leasing on budget finance committee reserve pending submission of a proposed lease it come back to the board of supervisors to budget and finance committee. for 17-18

the recommended reductions total 664, 527. of that amount all are ongoing saichbings and reductions allow increase of 4, 339, 085 or 3.5 percent in departments 17-18 budget. as i understand it the depermanent concur with the recommended reductions. >> thank you very much. supervisor tang. >> just a quick question, curious what is the facility near 805 bryant? >> the purpose is [inaudible] operation jz moving some of the items and collections we have at books hall to a space that is much more adequate and will house our mobile outreach. >> it will be-the idea it is long term? >> yes. we are looking at long term lease. >> thank you very much. item

22 we will consider. mr. her era i want to speak separately. can we approve that now? >> you can. >> thank you very much supervisors. the next item the library commission unanimously approved a resolution asking we request to appropriate 7.5 million from fy 16 general reserve that go thooz payment of our debts associated with the issuance of lease revenue bonds. some of those we use to partially support the completion of library improvement program. the supplemental appropriation will reduce the debt at $28 million from the original bond amount of $34 million. we work closely with controllers office of public finance and indicated the

library can refinance our current debt by reducing the prisple and estimate interest rates to 2.6 to 3.7 percent to the original sale which was 5.6 percent. it is all good fiscal management to reduce that debt and the long term savings approximate from 14 to $16.7 million. the bond term is for 25 years and end in 2034 but this will reduce the timeframe so ask for your support approving that appropriation and refunding. we also have jamie curuben from the controllers office of public financing to answer any questions. >> why don we go to the report from mr. rose. >> we totally agree this is the

best interest of it city to refund the future refunding of these lease revenue bonds. on page 40 in table 1 the department on the controllers office of public finance anticipate savings as the director mentioned. [inaudible] we recommend that you approve this ordinance. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. colleagues, any questions. we move to public comment for item 22 only. anyone wish to comment on item 22? >> good afternoon. peter war field. this was presenteds a prepayment of debt service to save money and there was no mention about brooks hall moving or mention of another facility as i recall. one the issues with the

library is distrunkz of the entire west wing of the 5th floor where the bound magazines about half the collection was housed and the removal to brooks hall so there can be a lurbing and literacy center placed there which we said could be placed in any store front or office building and not as a core function of the library housing the libraries collections so i'm completely taken aback that now those materials are going to be moved even further away then brooks hall which is basically the underground area in the civic center. i think the lack of public process here is very problematic. it is something that will have something to say about on the overall budget issue, but the idea that collections will be moving further and further away when

the literacy and learning center functions be in any location in the area of the library or not is very very problematic. it is real dismantling of the library as a library. thank you. >> thank you very much. anybody else wish to comment on item 22? seeing none, public comment is closed. motion on item 22 please only? >> like to move to full board with positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor yee and second by pr visor tang without objection. thank you very much and thank you to had city library for being here on their budget. we move up next to the airport. >> good morning. cathy wagner

with san francisco airport. the airport is in agreement with budget analysts recommendations and we would like to thank mr. rose and our analyst mr. low for their work on the airports budget this year. i am happy to answer questions and joined by the airports budget drether if you have specific questions. >> thank you very much. any questions? mr. rose can we get a report. . >> page 2 of the prort the recommended reductions to the budget total 3, 142, 122 in 16-17. these reduction allow increase of 38, 589, 602 or 4.2 percent in the 16-17 budget. 17-18 total

[inaudible] of that amont 1, 501, 726 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] these reductions would still allow increase of 31, 664, 116 or 3 percent the budget and understand the department concurs with the reductions and shown on pages 3-9 of the report. >> any questions? okay, thank you very much to the airport for being here and up next we have public utilities commission. i see mr. kelly here and team. >> good morning. harlan caly general manager of san francisco public utilities commission and we too are in agreement with the budget analyst and just want to thank them for coming and

listening to our stories and working out a win win for everybody. want to thank them. >> okay. mr. rose, go to your report, please. we can hear about the stories too if you want >> on page 29 of our report, i will go over each division within the puc, the first is bureau remed reduction to the proposed puc budget 541, 884 in 16-17. 419, 884 are on going savings and 122,000$122,000 are 1 time. hetch hetchy reduction toletal 1, 189, 381 and of that amount 1, 125, 597 are ongoing, 63, 734 are one time.

regarding the water enterprise the reduction to the 16-17 budget total 908, 930. 712, 811 are ongoing. regarding the waste water enterprise recommended reductions to the proposed 16-17 budget total 1, 273, 673. of that amount 1, 225, 805 are on going savings and [inaudible] overall for 16-17 the reductions total 3, 913, 818 which allow increase of [inaudible] 1.6 percent in the 16-17 budget. on page 30 of our report for fiscal year 17 hrf 18 the reduction for puc bureaus total

410, 685. of that are amount all are on going savings. hetch hetchy and power, recommended reduction total 991, 139 and of that amount 745, 180 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] one time. regarding the water enterprise our recommended reductions total 959, 632. of that amount 825, 610 are ongoing savings and [inaudible] water enterprise reduction total 965, 384 all ongoing savings. recommended reductions total [inaudible] 60, 600, 821 or 6 percent in the budget and understand the department concurs with our recommended reductions

which are shown on pages 31-40 of our report. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. colleagues any questions for the budget analyst or our department? okay. that is all we have for our item 10 and 11 budgets so we will open up 10 and 11 to public comment now. anybody that wishes to comment on 10 or 11 in our departmental budgets? >> parter warfield exectesk director of libraries users. i sent the supervisors last night and delivered a letter concerning the libraries testimony at the last budget and finance committee meeting last wednesday. the library has proposed changes only in the pucklic forum you provided, there was nothing at the libraries commission or no

discussion what so ever as part the budget or any other fashion and that is something that we are very sensitive to. we ask you to ask questions at the very least and perhaps reserve that amount until a proper process can be done at the library can with regard to hours. in general i have to say we are always in favor of more hours, more access >> student the public, but hours are not potatoes, there are hours the citizens said they wanted consistently to the library through all the surveys and testimony and that is evening and weekends. the library made no clarity to your committee orally or in the presentation materials as to which-what the hours will be that are changed nor what existing hours are and there was no process what so ever. i would say also proposition d which made

the library rich requires a specific process and have a copy of proposition d which i can give to you and that has not been fallowed either. that is because the library has consistently chinched library hours. the last time they ignoreed what the public said and tried to cut every evening from 9 to 8 o'clock and saturday mornings. we fought that and they had to retreat. this should not be imposed unless there is a proper process. >> thank you. any other members of the public who wish to comment on items 10 or 11? seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues we have departmental budgets for 10 and 11. unless the city attorney corrects me bhaut we like to do is take a motion accepting the budget analyst rmd recommendations cuts. all departments in agreement and forward 10 and

11 to the board meeting for july 12 of this year 2016. >> through the chair like to make a motion to that effect so 10 and 11 adopt the budget analyst recommendation and send to full board with positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor yang and seconded by supervisor yee. >> july 12. >> we take that without objection. would you call 15 and 17 together? >> [inaudible] the hetchy [inaudible] authorizing the issuance and sales of tax exempt power revenue bonds in principle amounts not to exceed

$32 million. item 17, ordinance appropriating approximately 158 million of hetch hetchy revenue and water revenue bonds for capital improvement program for fy 16-17 at 65 million and 2017 to 18 at $93 million. >> thank you, the puc is here 250 speak. >> the next 7 items-items 15-20 relate to capital funding. all the proposals were vetted in the public meetings with the commission as well as public meeting with capital planning committee. item 15, 16 and 17 relate to hetch hetchy water and power. item 16 and 17 relate to 2 year

capital appropriation and funding authorization for the next 2 fiscal years for hetch hetchy water and power totaling 158, 125, 130. happy to answer any question. >> thank you. colleagues, any questions or comments? i think we'll go to public comment for those items then. we wanted to harvey. mr. rose. >> madam chair, members of the committee, on page 19 of our report for these items, we note the descriptions of the projects are included in the attachment on 23 of the report.

on page 21 as you know supervisors the power bonds are repaid from the sfpuc hetch hetchy power enterprise revenues generated largely from the sale of electricity. sfpuc charges different rates to customers, the airport and sfpuc pay rets set by pg & e. others play different rates shown on table 4 of page 21 of the report. the sfpuc adopted new rates for other city departments increasing the rates by 50 cents per kilo watt hour shown in table 4. on page 22 i will revise our first recommendation. instead of

a-minding file 160473 to specify that the sfpuc submit future legislation to the board of supervisors we recommend that you amend file 160473 to require the sfpuc submit report to budget and finance committee on sale of the bonds and recommend you approve file 160473 as amended and 160470 and 160475. >> thank you very much. colleagues, any questions? comments? >> may i just make a comment that the increase to power rates was a half cent, not 50 cents. >> okay. we will move to public comment. anybody wish to comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we have a bla recommendation for the

legislation. any comments or questions from the puc on the recommendation? >> no we are in agreement with the recommendation. >> colleagues, unless any questions or comments or objections we entertain a motion to accept the budget analyst recommendation and move forward. >> make a motion to item 15 to a-mind the puc submit future legislation for future sale bonds and approve 16 and 17 all with positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor tang- >> i believe item 15 is hearing. >> okay. could we then motion to file item 15. >> [inaudible] >> what's that? >> would you like to release the reserved funds? >> let me triple check here what we are doing. on 15 is release reserves.

>> that is part of the legislation supervisor and recommend you release those monies. those are mitigation revenues. >> i resend my motion. item 15, let's go first with motion to release 2.7 million reserve. >> motion by supervise rb tang, veckd by supervisor yee and take without objection. >> number 15 be filed? >> a motion to file 15. >> take without objection. >> item 16 and 17 and apologize i forget the budget analyst recommendation applies to but to amend so the puc comes back before us with legislation to approve future sale of bonds. >> that is item 16, correct? >> just clarify that supervisor tang, it is file 160473 and instead

of requiring separate legislation to report back to budget and finance committee is our recommendation. >> okay. great. so, what harvey said for item 16 and move forward item 16 and 17 with amendment with positive recommendsation to full board. >> amend items 16 and move forward 16 and 17 with positive recommendation? >> correct. thank you everybody. motion by supervisor tang and second by supervisor kim without objection. call items 18 and 19. >> item 18 ordinance appropriating approximately 2 272 millions from bonds water revenue and [inaudible] public utilities commission [inaudible]

150 million and 2017-18 $122 million. [inaudible] other form of indetness by public utilities not to exceed $265 million to finance the cost of various capital water project benefiting the water enterprise. >> thank you very much. >> items 18 and 19 are similar to what you just heard item 16 and 17. they relate to 2 year capital appropriation and funding authorization for water enterprise totedling 272, 233, 620. the items were vetted in 5 public meetings and public meeting of capital planning committee and happy to answer questions. >> any questions? mr. rose can

we go to your report? >> yes. on page 27 of the report we note that the descriptions of the proposed projects are included on page 29 of our report. on page 28 of the report we note according to the 16-17 financial plan plans a 10 percent increase in water rates in 2016-17 and 7 percent increase in water rates in fy 2017-18 to cover the water enterprise operating capital costs. the sfpuc estimates the average rate water bill will increase brie $4 in 16-17.

again by another $3 in 17-18 from $44 to $47 in fy 17-18. again, we have the same recommendation that we made on the first item. we revice to report to budget and finance committee instead of separate legislation and recommend you approve the files as amended. >> thank you mr. rose. any questions? any comments on the recommendation? >> we agrie with the budget analyst. >> move to public comment. anybody wish to comment on item 18 or 19? seeing none, public comment is closed. we have recommendation by there budget analyst. comments, questions, motions? >> motion to send forth to full board with positive recommendations. item 18 and 19. with budget analyst recommendation.