not to the merits of proposed project that will be considered to the another time so i'll ask the commenters to speak slowly and clearly the court will produce on accurate transport and state your name for the record the draft eir was published on may 4, 2016, the public comment began on may 5th and extends until 5:00 p.m. on july 5, 2016, following the close of comments the planning department will prepare the rtc document after hearing comments from the general we'll take comments from the draft eir from the planning commission this that concludes my presentation. and unless commissioners have questions i respectfully request the public hearing be open.

>> speakers i'll call speakers please line up (calling names) okay first speaker please. >> please. first speaker. >> in any order the 6 of you are in. >> hello my name is owen i live on scott street zip codes i'm here to support in project and urge to certify the eir at&t's as written this benefits the neighborhood and the city and it is much

needed because we need a substantial increase in market-rate housing in san francisco itges the use of public transportation because of it's location and it also represents the gold standard in urban planning, i.e., a large dense project at a transit stop please certify the eir and ultimately support in project thank you. >> your mr. o'donnell, sir. >> yes. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> mr. tillman. >> commissioners i'm bob tillman i've owned and operated a mission and opposed property since 2005 at the 25 and mission and i'm here to support the

draft eir statement for 1979 mission as written i'd like to urge you to approve that statement and i think that if san francisco can't approve a project on top of literally on top of one of the largest hubs in the desire city where can you, in fact, build a dense residential project thank you very much. >> thank you, marlyn (calling names). >> hello my name is mary line i'm from the organization we're an environmental justice organization that works primary in san francisco with the latino families i'm here to oppose this project there are folks seeing this will help transit but

you're building a parking lot next to the school that effects the families and students and in san francisco we have a problem what pedestrians are hit by cars you'll see cars next to the school put cars next to the school children are playing. >> speak slower for the transcriber. >> basically you're hearing reviewing the environment people play and live and eat and play, etc. we're the environment the environment does not want this here we're consistently opposes this we as the people who live here pray here and eat here we don't want this project. >> ma'am, ma'am, sorry to interrupt we need to keep our comments limited to the accuracy and adequacy of the environmental impact report not about the project but the

environmental impact report and it's analysis. >> as someone in the environment i oppose this project. >> i remind you this is one of the project alternative transportation that's what you speak to (calling names). >> i'm reminded members of the public to please silence our mobile didn't see if you don't know how please turn them off. >> hello, i'm scott on guerrero street in the neighborhood a few blocks from the proposed developments i just to urge the commission to please certify the eir for this project it can move forward i believe that building a dense project next to transit is an

example of responsible urban design and is going to be agree for the environment putting this here ♪ location avoids creating unnecessary car travel that causes traffic so i urge to please certify the eir so this project can move forward thank you >> thank you. >> mr. pool. >> good evening rob poole/san francisco housing action coalition. again speaking on behalf of the 3 homicide organizations and business members we ask you to certify the environmental impact report for mission street this site is zoned for significantly 10 stories for the rest of the neighborhood and if we are going to speak to the adversary eir this is the place to build a dense housing project that can

hopefully serve residents of all income levels in san francisco if so a way to encourage people to take transit to walk to work and bike and get out of their cars we urge you to certify the eir and thank you for your time. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> thank you, david a gibson sro collaborative i ask you to not certify this project it is not not to build is that will tie up and cause more traffic and have an negative impact on the isn't that correct or navigation with the people there thank you does not certify is this project. >> good evening, commissioners my name is charley i'm here as a

70 residents and renter i'd like to comment on the draft eir specifically on the showed impact on the adjoining elementary school in reviewing the draft eir the project sponsor has offered to raise the playground that actually allows for sunlights on the mraurgd it was the project sponsors expense we firmly believe that this is a win-win alternative we firmly believe that is an acceptance community page and not result in decreased affordable units under the planning code we ask for your support of the draft eir today or i do excuse me - >> thank you. (calling names) >> hi good evening city commissioners i'm in favor and

doctor glenn favors it we need people and housing we want to be dependent and thank you for the hate and masonic is done and the project is done on fulsome the agreement is done for disable for housing thank you for the exemptions we favor we had seven hundred and 47 clients in group homes i've beening in san francisco in the mission district we need changes we need see in the - they want changes they're tired the homeless and people selling travel ticket and we the retail use has been there for many years we need hours and thank you for gwen in a lou in a and i live locally

thank you. we have thank those people they're doing a good job. >> (calling names). >> last call okay (calling names). >> sir. >> somebody talk. >> hi good afternoon planning commission i'm with the mission collaborative with community services and with the plaza 16 coalition here to speak about the impacts we support of

alternative the draft eir before you is i think adequate because it didn't talk about the effects of displacement of local businesses we frequent and nonprofits and tenants for us specifically the sro tenants railway are we or presents with developments from private interests their adequate to the real situation on the streets one which we are two keenly aware of in our jobs and lives the impact of this involvement open rent-controlled sro buildings will be devastating we have seen it in a two block radius of mission the site of this monster project we've seen an sro fully closed for massive renovations in order to make that appealing for newer residents we've seen an sro

community-based on the market when this development was proposed and one turn into i'm quoting a tech con menu we've seen one listing hotel rooms on airbnb and booking.org this is an associate economic impact to the neighborhood bausz caused by luxury developments this report is immoral an inadequate and i think complete document bans certain impacts that don't include out the monster in the mission will effect any facets of the neighborhood beyond all the finding in the documents there are a lot of pain worry and destruction the impacts of on enfettered suit of money are catastrophic and traumatic especially during a country produces a situation

in which the situations wrought in to daily with the emergency are inadequate we ask that the draft eir include the final eir include many of the impacts i've stated and many of the impacts that will be stated by the many speakers after me. >> thank you, sir. >> nora guzman we're here to testify on behalf of the homeless folks that actually reside at the go mission center half a block from that protected project which actually, we think that is going to have a devastating input into the homeless communities in the center the only one in the mission district the only one that serves the latino cabinets

and spanish speakers throughout the city that is interesting the project sponsor never were impacted to talk about the impact it will have, in fact, it of the mentioned nothing whatsoever about the mission a half a block that supports 16 hundred duplicate homeless people a year it is important in the final ruiring eir the impact on homelessness people that are with the sro teentsz a contemplate and remember gentrification kills our people we had a gentrifyer called the police we don't want this repeated if you build something look at the marvel in the mission because we're for 100 percent affordable if you want density that's what we want thank you. >> thank you.

>> my name is julian an organizer with the mission chapter of the alliance for community k3w6r789 a group of low and moderate income homeland security thought the district and city and state when we are talking about you know our members are very concerned about the possibility of being pushed out this is an environmental concern the facts of being pushed out to the surrounding cities having commute from hayward or vallejo into our job at the hotel or anywhere else in san francisco is an environmental impact it's been documented our members know that when you have so many

luxury units built in a neighborhood the impact on displacement is significant and so i urge you to reject the environmental impact report and to reject this project overall. >> thank you ms. - >> can you speak into the microphone. >> i have a presentation if you can please put the overhead on that would be great okay. so we'll i'm setting this up i'm marie i am an organizer with a justice cause i support a no project alternative the draft eir does not accurately recognition all the impacts of the environmental impact displacement so for that reason it should be rejected what i want to show

here is something that the community actually developed over one year and a half 6 planning meeting we develop the marvel on mission i can't get the internet to work on your computer here so - >> this is the computer. >> can i pause my time awhile i figure out the internet - so the maufrl on mission as you can see a lot of people talking about the need for density and for building on a transit corridor our community members are not necessarily opposed to that idea but we are opposed to density for density sake or density for luxury sake with with that building the rebate we're calling it the maufrl on

mission it has enough housing that be development for community members what we have here is the 10 story tower these are heights that were approved by our community members over here we have a community center open space we have a plaza where the needs of the existing residents people that hang out there can, recognized and actually making thes space better we're recognizing the cultural needs of the neighborhood and the folks that use this space and facilitating that we're creating green space and parks and what is beautiful about this project aside from the fact it is 100 percent affordable and community design and community approved didn't cause a shadow impact on marshall school housing that rivals that of the monster not create a massive

shadow impact on maurld is houses thousands of families and creates and park and office space for hundreds of working class families i want to show you a video but i can't get it up on the computer i wanted to show a slice ever what a year and a half over three hundred residents over 6 communities meetings that led to this so i'll say for you to reject the draft eir for you all to reject this monster in the mission and if it is building on 16th street and mission build the maufrl thank you. >> thank you last call for edwardo. >> (calling names).

>> any of those folks in the house? >> okay i understand okay. (calling names) >> we'll be providing interpretation for him. >> why not use the other microphone then. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so my name is van very well

a round for the last 20 years. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so i'm here i also support no alternative for this project the reason he support no alternative there you are so many evictions in the city they're caused by luxury development. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> 14 hundred families are being impacted in the mission. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> i'm not begin building are construction i don't want to be set aside because someone wants to build giant lurk condos.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> every time i'm coming in into san francisco i see the complains and how much housing san francisco i building. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> and scopes to have some of that for our community we ask you to support and approve the maufrl on mission. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> it is ourself our community that puts you in the position you're in do not set us aside when our community is in need. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> our project is dignified and recognizes the dignity of people to have housing not cause

evictions and displacement and make sure there are no more people living in bridges and in tense harass day to day by the police. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> from the city has $20 million to has homelessness people why not use that money to build housing instead. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> and so what i ask to you support of maufrl on mission that is about time your community gets heard. >> thank you. >> thank you, mr. valenzuela. >> your public comment needs to focus on the accuracy and adequacy of the project not for the alternative for the

projects. >> good afternoon. i'm sharon i'm a 35 plus year residents of the mission and i am not against worth i didn't people some of my best friends are weighty not one of the worth i didn't people - i've seen the impact in the mission i can't drive down my street without waiting through a couple of stoplights i could get to the stoplight and cross the street now that is getting very difficult to get anywhere in the

city and the impact of the new construction is very difficult on the local people that surrounded i can speak to that forfeiture are assure they're starting new construction across the street from any apartment building and destroying the previous structure my building has been shaking the noise is phenomenal and their replacing tell poles all the activity makes we nervous wreck i have a place to live i think that lower income people and people of poverty are going the way of the dotal bird we're the ones having the

environmental impact we are the ones if we didn't have wings we would we're not counted because if there were bird in that neighborhood that was on the ensdiergd species they would stop that construction. >> so i am against the certification of the project in the mission as it is now i am for community input who are the people going to live in the luxury apartments where are they going to come from they have to displace us to live there. >> most of us not all of us but most of us very little

affordable housing units in that building. >> thank you. >> thank you, ms. york. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so my name is a - i've been living in san francisco for the past 16 years and i support a no project alternative and also a tenant that is being evicted. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so what i think if we're doing to build housing housing for lower-income or looking for

housing instead of building more and more luxury housing that's it thank you. >> thank you, ms. >> next speaker, please. >> it's her first time doing public comment can we give her a rourmz. >> yeah. >> (clapping.) >> my name is a - i'm a member of justice cause i would if san francisco for 10 years i'm a girlfriend entrepreneurial it goes to school everyday not that the rich people can go there, there are other people i go for the other building thank

you. >> thank you colleagues, any questions or comments? >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon, commissioners my name is gregory i'm a proud member of program of the lower street community services and i sand in support of no project alternative the airport through it may contain vital information it does not reflect the social and economical effect of structures this size small businesses that now have served our community for years are being moved out children and the air we breathe that be greatly effected with

san francisco housing crisis i feel this monster structure will impact the residents living in the mission that will be a slap in the faces of every adapted individual ♪ city please consider what i've said thank you. >> the mayor minority know about planning i'm jordan and david i assure you as heck will not give you my address i only live in san francisco i oppose the modern e monster in missions first i'll give a reason that maternity result in legal action i don't want poor or brown and black children blocked by this

monster we're the most densely populated city after negotiation one hundred and 63 spaces i can people driving recklessly which not only is a reckless disregard for human lives a lot of poor people like myself don't have cars this is more cars in transit i have a special stake with the resource center i receive coffee and mail and even now i receive any primary and transition care and this is others only - why is it relevant the project might cast a shadow over that but in a

precursor situation they're by this project there will be a tendency to shut down you must stop skwurgs is hurts the entire neighborhood it is an environmental review and it is lgbt and exasperates homeless consider the maufrl on the mission and no project alternative last call (calling names). >> any of you folks in the house i'll call a few more names

(calling names). >> thank you, commissioners my name is gena resident of san francisco and worked in the mission since 1983 the eir concludes that the project and the alternative project shadow will result in an adverse impact on marshall elementary playground, however, the shadow occurs mainly in the afternoon after school is over and children are dismissed for the day a reasonable amount of alternatives studied and the issue has been thoroughly vetted we hope that process precedes quickly you approve 1979 mission and the eir certified thank you

thank you, very much. ms. kaplan. >> next speaker, please. >> you know me. >> i do after all those times. >> my name is mary sorenson i'm with the unit mission i'm reading a letter from susan she's a so you aren't u couldn't be here because she has child at marshall elementary and has childcare obligations i'm speaking in regards to the eir dust and noise the school needs to be relocated at that site the building to be demolished with filled with asbestos and lead not safe for the small children the noise will also guardrail disrupt teaching and the

environment classroom activities were completely disrupted when 1 thing street light was being added near the school a project this size will produce one hundred times that amount of noise rear yard requirements 24 percent the purchase of the rear yard open space to reduce the feeling of crowding that's why it is supposed to be at the edge of the lot their proposal to have are their open space in the center of the project completely eradicates the - impact of the - open space many of those students are there until 6 o'clock they're in an after-school program this is the only open space they have access

a marshall parents asked for open space next to the school is thus reducing the feeling the playground being full and given children an open have you and flatly refused these addressed the eir did not mitigate the health hazards to the school calculations at the end depiction end and not mitigate the adverse impact effected on the playground showed and otherwise i'd like to add that that in this is a transit human being inform parking spaces and they have one hundred and 60 that will be come out open capping street that is where children come and go and waiting for the first child to get hit

because you think that will happen also on the eastern neighborhoods plan it said that transit hubs should be more first responder this is more luxury thank you. >> (calling names). >> she requested to have the proerj on hi, i'm diana resident of the richmond and the south of market and in solidarity with the mission from those neighborhood i support a no project alternative and respectfully request the final eir consider the community each time that was being discussed this evening i wanted to talk about the 100 percent and 63 parking spaces when there yours no parking required this means this is not

transit oriented development that goes begin the general plan and sits on top of the bart station no parking in the logistics of putting in the parking spaces only adds to the cost of this project so that relates to the fact that they're talking about how reducing the number of units to mitigate the shadow on maushld so making the lower - but they're adding one and 63 parking spaces so you canned dismiss that alternative as invalid alternative on a cost basis and also they're hiring one of the most expensive architect firms for this you're adding luxury costs to this project where you don't need to

do that and in that way they you know they can't just talk about the project goals and costs and dismissing easements the other things the inclusionary housing the fact they're playing around with the planning section planning code section 415 and having the 49 sorry the 41 anchors before sale and one and 20 percent ami where the market-rate is maybe technically not in vision but violation but again their approve the agreements and marketing proposals instead of building 100 percent affordable housing so again, the 49 additional offsite bmr units

with this is required through the development agreement this is very familiar to what we fought begins in 5 m you're creating a bastard version of the planning code and not following who's really following the inclusionary housing and this shouldn't be used as a ploy for the public to see it is more affordable than it really is. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hi, my name is christie a member of ace i'm a 50-year resident inform san francisco living no more presidio park at the edge of the mission this project to me is pillow crushing especially it is a sense occurring at ground zero

of the homeless and displacement issue in the city i increased extents is promote as environmentally friendly or progressive and that might make sense only in a different economic climate we're not in an era of acute economic disparities that has to be given consideration i realize that's not how second is designed but true nicole like many others i support no alternative i support and i urge you to reject the eir i'll speak to the first of all, the terrible consequences for the school a lot of people spoken to that the lack of light the

increased traffic density but beyond that i think this project and others like it seem to be in the pipeline for the mission completely ignored the traffic consequences it is gridlock in the mission and people running backgrounds on bart in the mission they cross the bridge and more people get adapted out of the city and commute back to the city bart is at a point beyond capacity don't look to bay area rapid transit is not accommodating the issues right now when you have more people moving into the neighborhood especially with a whole different type of class of residents with their own cars they'll be going in and out of

the city generating a huge impact of people consulting to the city and drive into the city a huk requester you have toe look at this within a large con stresses and the city that will generate more impacts the eir has to look beyond as we look at the eir alone i suggest you reject the eir and has accommodated not all the environmental impacts thank you very much. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening i'm christine and i'm part of sro collaborative

which is a program in delores community services i'm here to speak about the environmental review and it is i think adequate district attorney talk about the displacement of local businesses we frequent and nonprofits and tenants as myself many of us have no where to go if we're displaced weeping we'll end up on the streets being homeless 2009200014 hundred families were adapted in the last 16 years and 2009 plus evictions have taken place and in the mission of san francisco protecting housing is much needed we don't need luxury condo but affordable housing we

need parks and neighborhood clean streets for everyone pardon we need nights to be safe for women and children to walk please no alternative develop but housing we can all be safe thank you. >> before mr. turner last call (calling names). >> mr. turner and brooke turner the preparation for the dr was very transparent process that included comments on the community planning check list and published over a year ago all of the public comments on the cpa check list are responded to on the dr

the shadows and the alternative transportation of the project on this project have been studied critically and thoroughly the dr period i'm sorry the yes period is much longer the ceqa period we believe the environmental impact process is adequate we do not see a reason to delay this much noted project thank you very much. >> thank you very much mr. turner. >> next speaker, please. >> >> (speaking foreign language.) >> hello my name is - and. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> english you're supposed to

be speaking english. >> hi, i'm with the sro collaborative a project of the delores heights and i'm here to talk about the social impact the first time. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> in the draft environmental impact report is insufficient didn't analysis the displacement on small business owners small property owners small business owners and tenants like myself. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> members of the planning commission i'm one hundred percent against the monster in the mission. >> (speaking foreign language.)

>> i'm against this the majority the apartment are lecturer prices and executive for people that be rich and those folks will buy in stores that are executive to their price points small businesses will be completely disappear more than they already are. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> so when overseeing small businesses leave they go to other cities where they're able to survive and that will have a massive impact on the mission district cultural and traditions. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> and it is abused of that i ask you to make the right decision and without being

racist and favoritism. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> but your decision before their well-being the residents of the mission and not cause them any harm or preoccupation. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> we are the people and we demand to be recognized thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hello my name is teresa i'm from the mission sro collaborative a program with the delores street, i believe the first time is insufficient didn't take into consideration the impact of displacement this is a associating economical impact i support no project each time i do not support this project the monster in the mission housing for the rich and i would like to

state that we need far more hours for the homeless population that over 6 thousand people that also effects me and people in any community because the homeless plight is dire and in not enough affordable housing the homeless problem will persist i was homeless and it's not fun finding affordable housing is not easy by building those it gaps the residents and makes it hard for low income people to rent in the neighborhood thank you very much thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> not spirit of sport we're coming up we gave a stack all of

those people had speak and you name her they'll name themselves thank you. >> good afternoon. my name is alicia allison park 7 years old and i oppose the monster in the mission they're building luxury hours not for working class and i oppose this the people needs the housing to be affordable i am sad and mad people are kicked out of their hours this is why this is important. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is davie a member i've lived in san francisco for 18 years allison park a student and city college and currently live in outer mission i used to

live in the excelsior i know the impact of the luxury condo it is not accurate and didn't address the issue the displacement and didn't name the local businesses and nonprofits that will be adapted by this such increased the times to come back to the mission for necessary services to go to school i'm here to talk about jurisdiction effects the community because culture is lost and government some prioritize families that lost their homes they should help them out it frustrates me affordable housing is lost also affordable housing is seen as a hard decision to make when it isn't and that is why you should support the marvel in the mission is it so an alternative

that the poem came up with with affordable housing thank you, thank you davie. >> good evening. i'm a member with this group i live in san francisco so far 16 years i'm used to live in bayview but i support the mission i don't want to see everything gentrified by the fulsome the government should stop building luxury housing or shelters i'm here to talk about because i want to fight for everything that the community wants i oppose the monster and support the marvel in the mission.

>> next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm a member of the costing to i've lived in san francisco for 14 years i'm a sfosh my family has been evicted from the mission we now live in the dog patch district as low income we my family and i are one of many families that have been evicted and because of all the luxury like monster in the mission the draft environmental impact report is inadequate and not address the issue of displacement it is does not name the impact on residents and local businesses and nonprofit that will be adapted by this project such increased in commute time for those coming back to the mission for necessary services are go to school jurisdiction has affected any community by making us worry

about where we'll be able to afford good housing and still living around our jobs and school i urge to so forth and listen to our community. >> plastic bag take into consideration the marvel in the mission from personal experience i know how hard it is to find affordable housing and the marvel in the mission will provide affordable housing for all families like mine thank you. >> your name, again ma'am. >> okay. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is hiding i'm a member of the costa-hawkins i'm a self-conscious at balboa park high school the draft environmental impact report didn't name the impacts on the locals and nonprofit will be adapted by 24 project i'm here to talk about it gentrification

effects the families in the missions when luxury housing are built those families are not able to live in 245ush homes because of high costs i oppose the monster and support of marvel. >> thank you, mr. perez. >> next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm a member the castro street to i'm a sophomore at allowing and i live two blocks away from this project i'm here representing my family and neighborhoods gentrification effects our living and - the draft development environmental impact report is i think adequate and not address displacement and not name the impacts of local businesses and nonprofits that be be adapted by the commute times coming back for necessary services work or go to school i'm here today

because i want to stay in the city i've called home for the last 12 years and urge to support the people's plan and alternative the community don't need more luxury housing what we need a truly affordable housing this is why we need to oppose the monster and support of marvel in the mission. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is yvonne a member of castro street i've lived in san francisco for 4 years and my family has lived here a long time i think or live in the bayview and the craft environmental impact report is indicated not address the issue of displacement and not named impact on existing businesses and nonprofit that will be displaced as much as increased in commute times for us to come back to the mission for

necessary services work and go to school i'm here to thank you to you decide gentrification effects my family i can't see my grandmother she's sick and they have to commute everyday so i can see them i oppose the monster and support of marvel in the mission because city government should say make that easy for people to commute to work everyday. >> thank you, ms. thomas. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is - i'm a member of the castro street i've lived if san francisco my whole 17 years i'm in the conveyer not my place to talk about for the mission but it strikes as a virus i oppose the monster in the mission the community does need homes for the affordable

for low income families and mrooug that one percent the showed over user marshall high school i come here to support give us hope that the old mission had been strong and without tearing that down. >> i'm a freshmen student i have seen the challenges the families are going through i oppose the monster in the mission because the environmental impact report is not adequate address didn't address the issue of displacement it does name the impact on local businesses and nonprofits that will be displaced as much as interests in the community and times for all of those coming

back for come back to the mission for others work and go to school building luxury homes had been taking away homes and work for many people that rely on working in the mission. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. i'm geremo 16-year-old and live in the bayview a member of the castro street i oppose this that impacts the community it will 0 cause a big shadow and who lives in a building not the people that live in the mix for a long time the building is not for protecting working families and not fair it contrasts the environmental impact report is in adequate and didn't address he did irks that displacement not name the impact of existing residents the local businesses and the fingertips that will be

adapted by this project as much as the increase in the communities for all those coming back to the mission for service and work and go to school i know many families with adapted it is not easy - we a a community came here to let he knows we support our project because the building will impact everyone in the community i support the people's plan thank you. >> thank you home share in advance. >> i'm a member of castro street i've lived in san francisco i live in bayview and potrero hill a year at lincoln i support all community fighting forever gentrification and who needs affordable housing and not luxury condo the first time does

not address the issue the displacement and didn't name the impact on existing residents local businesses and nonprofits that will displace by this project as much as increasing commute times for all those having to come back to mission for necessary service work and go to school i'm here to talk to i on the 70 should support of families that are needed how people have getting evicted by the rent and the bills are going up oppose the monsters and support of marvel in the mission adapted people in a working area they've been taking outs poor people in poor neighborhood and raising up their bills. >> thank you, mr. home share in advance.

>> next speaker, please. >> i lived in san francisco when i was 4 i lived with any family for 12 years i'm 16 a telephone grader and go to balboa park high school when i got this happening to the mission that tears me apart the people from the start this feeling that i feel for the people in the mission living in a small houses and part-time is just designation the monster is the building and shadowing the children's playground and school but i'm here for supporting the mission eve we have to protest being here to the people that live in the mission

i support the mission and support in the mission i know how the mission and the other people in the mission are going through this is because we're here to give all got to help. >> thank you, ms. lopez. >> next speaker, please. >> hi, my name is debar and i've been living in san francisco for 10 years i'm here to tell you guys do support of marvel in the mission and oppose the eir my family has been evicted once from bayview not a lot of people know that it has been hard looking for a place i know that personally and right now my dad lost his job i'm pretty sure we'll get kicked

out not a lot of affordable housing my family can't afford $3,500 on one apartment because that's how high you know not a lot of families make that much money and so - sorry this is my first time speaking. >> it's okay. it's okay. >> so, yeah i'm really sad because the culture in the mission has been going down and i'm just like the culture i feel like it needs to live admonish we've been fighting for that to keep our culture alive and as gentrification is going to be in the missions our culture will be dead >> (clapping.) >> thank you, ms. >> from the audience can please keep it's applause to raising you're hands in the air

i'll appreciate it. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening. i'm keith i've been here now for 2 two years going on i've spent 11 and a half years in the streets living out of a shooting o shopping cart now on 16th street for 10 years i'm speaking against the home sharing high-rise glass ugly your spoiling the communities as well as displacing the businesses that are there now serving us and the people off low income which live there as well i'm for any alternative that keeps the building and residents as well as keep the prices down so therefore that's my position

thank you very much. >> thank you very much. >> i'll call some more cards (calling names) my name is jonathan and i used to be homeless important several years hero in san francisco and here to actually ask to support of environmental impact report i used 0 live in the mission district and lived a block away from 16th street and mission 25 years and so i appreciate the great permit or transit i did not appreciate the crime and dangers just this week a murder on 16th street and mission i remember the murder out of wells fargo this is not a gentrification. >> excuse me - folks excuse

me - folks no outbursts please. i was homeless i a member of the san francisco i lived enernex next door to hundred by the transit american it doesn't hurt us to live next door to wealthy to house protecting and help lower-income people within two blocks of 1979 mission 6 hundred plus units of housing for homeless and thousand unions for low income seniors and individuals and families i mean some many projects rich with protecting housing and if would be great to have some other other kind of income in that neighborhood any friend beverly was evicted both months ago she made two of money to quality

thooes she's and nonprofit working she's in concord 1979 mission is offered to build housing we need to have the compassion for everyone we need to have unity between all these classes we can't afford housing wars we need to build housing i support it plaza 16 coalition but went to singapore last year a real eye openers seeing one millions units of home sharings high-rise and it was not rental homeownership so i know that we and build housing and not be faired of change and move both

the 21st century or we'll be left behind a third world country. >> good evening. i'm shawn norris i am a lifetime resident and i'm in opposition to the monster on mission a lot of people made a lot of comments i'm here to talk about the shadow impact and the airport environmental impact report we haven't mentioned the specifics what that does to the mash elementary and the playground there have been studies there's been medical studies where

vitamin dpshz can ready to depreciation and depreciation this is something that effects the communities and kids in development you know they're trying to have has thank you - i'm in support of model on mission and in support of the communities taking control over their own development and saying what they president in in their community instead of an outside agency doing things that effect the health of the community and

people around them you know and asking about who this is for you know thinking about our serve of the people already in the community or people trying to more often and take into account how this will displace and effect other people in the neighborhood that they presume to want to be part of yeah - thank you for your time and i hope you guys are will very heavy consider our decisions will accepting or not. >> thank you, sir. >> good evening, commissioners want to address a couple of particular he means it in the draft eir that are of concern today, i want to speak principally as a member of the

red stone template association a 5013 of the wltd hundred building in san francisco one of the concerns we would like to see thoroughly address our water table concerns that buildings in 2, 3, 4 area uncommon have water issues because these projects are all resting on top of mission creek and not uncommon to center consistently water problems and they can, of course, be extremely exasperated duce to lag scale underground construction secondly, i want to talk about the traffic impacts which are in the adequately addressed here this draft eir seems to defer

the traffic impacts to the eastern neighborhoods eir traffic studies if i'm seeing it correctly and we don't believe that eardrum environmental review adequately studies it studies a quantify general elements but doesn't look at what is happening in on the ground manageable and being merged in the taking into account the long reserve consultants and the out commutes we are we know that you are happening and not take into account the mission families are making long and sometimes daily consultants from arn attack to drop kids off at school and shop at the stores and going to their jobs this was not anticipated in this

eastern neighborhoods environmental impact report this is also where their services many of the organizations that have representatives hero that services overseeing communities are located you have to come hero to get the service centers they don't exist on the out curiosities of area nbc report said a new study by the transportation authority confirms commuting in the student is an absolute crawl because the eastern neighborhoods eir did not correctly assess what was going to happen with traffic lastly i don't think i don't think it take into account the goorlg bus to quote supervisor eric mar the horrible impacts of those many shuttles. >> thank you, sir you'll call some more names

(calling names). >> hi my name is v with the plazas 16 accreditation and coalition action network we've been living in the mission singles 2011 a worker and consumer that seize with gentrification don't so a neighborhood i live near to the plaza 16 bart station and i personally use the following businesses (calling names) vietnam market on 16th street the burger king located at 16th street street and mission chinese restaurant on 16th

street and the walgreens on mission street the only business i don't use is the city club on the 5 businesses will be adapted once you approve the project at 1979 mission and i wanted to - people have talked about the shadow on mash school playground they have a solar panel here we are with rising tides and love people and industry rely on fossil fuel their trying to teach the young people will alternative energy our impacting not just a shadow on the elementary school but the future the planet the type of fuel we'll be using to power our industries and so we're effecting the future the environment and the future and the impacts will be more

congestion and pollution and the associating economic impact a rip emancipation proclamation he will effect due to this once you approve a 10 story luxury complex other landlord might be able to get more out of their tenants we don't want to see more people burn out of their homes for the sake of raising their rent more for their money so i'm very concerned for all those reasons what we need it affordable housing that is aesthetically please carry on conversations out in the hallway. and with a design i don't want to see class walker i think the common ground we need the tech co-workers need it,too i was recently at the salesforce

knowing they can't afford 5 or $10,000 a month some of them have homeless we all need affordable housing please support of marvel on mission thank you, thank you ms. gwen. >> next speaker, please. >> thank you are we good commissioners good evening my name is larry and i'm happy to be here this evening thank you for hanging in there for some many hours i want to point out one thing based on the number of things i've heard tonight this particular project

is not displacing any residents this project you know is very much needed in san francisco and in the mission district because of the amount of housing that that provides in a transit rich area so that's one alcohol, tobacco & firearms things i wanted to mention the other thing related to the eir just wanted to mention that has i reviewed it i noticed the geology are studied in the internal revenue and confused by that because sun's excavation adjacent to bart will be governed by bart and the structural plan that be reviewed by bart and the department of building inspection it me this would be done active and

inauspicious excuse me - folks it is unnecessary everyone gets 3 minutes to speak it is disruptive and inconsiderate. >> thank you good evening. i'm dwayne i realized i resides within the mission district a client of the resource center i must say a welcoming entity within the city i am currently homeless highly share that so people understand that coming to this city from the complete oppose side of the in fact, and seeking the resources to not continue to remain on the streets of all the

right away centers i've been to the city i prefer and recommend the neighborhood resource center overall not saying anything against anyone they've catered to my needs more than anyone in the neighborhood saying that i say that to say if this project is approved and this resource center is adapted people like me trying to go to school and work and support the community that supports me it makes it hard i don't think that it is fair for somebody to - i'm currently self-employed i'll appreciate affordable housing i don't think that is right for something i feel abag because i don't perform a certain job or

because i don't pursue a career i'm not entitled to live where i want to live that's not fair i'm speaking on myself i deliver food on a bicycle, the impact on traffic would be just i feel like it would be terrible not only for myself by others i'm a bike. >> and last i have to say for the people behind me if i want to after i want them to have affordable housing when they get to my age and such i think that affordable housing is should be people over profit people before profit that's how i think. >> thank you, mr. feat mr. weaver.

>> i'm scott weaver wanted to clarify the shadow impact it was said earlier the developer agreed to raise the gown it has a mitigation of the shadow impact as a matter of fact, 3 alternative transportation and all 3 were substantial and you think avoidable showed impact an marshall playground not an academic exercise this is a playground where kids play everyday during recess and lunch and after school it is unique no playgrounds in the immediate area suitable for children of elementary school age is in the just an academic thing but a serious type of environmental impact that you may want to ask for further exploration by the

planning department we've talked about displacement and we've talked about it's actual impact on the environment displacement keep your eyes on the ball heavier traffic and displacement causes green house gas we may august that causes displacement but look at valencia and other less than market-rate built and see how it district has changed instead of buying doughnuts people bow $6 crew santsz not the doughnut that doughnut seller had to go somewhere and displacement was not assessed i don't think that was assessed in the eir and if it was it would be hard to

believe the eir anticipated the level of displacement we've seen between 2008 and 2016 that simply wouldn't is anticipated the level of displacement and it's impacts on traffic and so forth now i could be wrong it's not the first time i was wrong about something all the people said it will not cause displacement so when it comes up. conditional use user your evaluating with the emergency rooms whether or not there is a associate economic impact you should know that the department should be telling you you one other thing about the sro hotels you need to ask the department to look at what is happening in the sro in the mission you need

to know that it is your job the department is not telling you it is your job to demand of the department what is going on in the sro hotels and figure out how to mitigate the problems we're already seeing thank you >> thank you, mr. weaver. >> come on up. >> come on up ma'am, come on up. >> good afternoon. i'm martin with the mission sro families program mission collaborative at delores street our family serves over 50 families and children in the mission lynn in single-room occupancy hotels and we're here to you know offer a perspective from the work we do we support of no project alternative your

consideration of the project the monster in the mission and the involuntarily assessment being reviewed we see your acts a as a treat to the tenants the environmental assessment ignores children and their voting rights to a healthy living environment singles i worked in the mission in january, the monster the response from community outreach is hostility the not the assessment when i visit the sro families with the outreach workers i see children that want to play and run down the halls in the hotels they can't do that they have limited public space and the green space to play in near their home environment and

in fact, the signs posted for savior penalties if shrn or children are making too much noise they put the people alters risk at marble marshall high school and spent programming there so they can be having that outlet they can't do that in the hotel and not affordable housing to go to and it puts our kids and families health at risk the environmental assessment we're not stupid and then insult to say this will not displace any families in the mission and should not be approved request the sro families imagined this project the depress it causes the impacts our sro their anybody elseal well-being with working with the stressers to survive in the mission in puts our divorce well-being at risk

and seeing imagining inbe effective - this - you can't separate the social impacts when we talk about the impacts you need to consider those families i leave but with the powering outreach worker that had to leave early because this meeting was projected this topic we don't need a monster in the mission we need assessable housing i feel if this environmental assessment goes forward our supporting further displacement of our families in the mission. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hi my name is diane i'm with the sro collaborative a

program of the lower street community services i'm here to speak about the socially economic impacts the first time i urge a no project alternative the draft eir is inadequate didn't talk about the facts of displacement of the local businesses nonprofits and tenants such as myself it hurts the children and from the noise from the construction that disruptive the children's environment for two academic years and hurt my community because this project will drive a up the cost of living and more and more people are getting evicted people needed stable housing affordable housing will be unable to afford the rent if this is built the property values in the neighborhood will go up i urge a no project

alternative. >> the next speaker can come on up i'll call more people (calling names). >> hi good evening i'm sorry diana martin's i work with a program under the delores street the dir is inadequate because it does not talk about the effects of the displacement of local businesses nonprofits and the tenants now i specifically want to talk about how displacement what effect the traffic and pollution in the area this commute that is effected by the displacement is can really, really impact the

air in the area can you imagine the effects that the extra pollution has on the community that lives there we as the rock have surveyed the tenants in the sros and mission we found so many health conditions that the sro tenants are dealing with as related bronchitis an array of health problems do we want to add pollution in the area that would add to their health now also the construction would add dust asbestos all kinds of tings that make the air you think reasonable and not just hurting the folks but the students and the tenants in general so this construction would add so much problems and it is really going to hurt those who are there in the areas

it is insufficient it didn't discuss the as i said the problems with the displacement sros are constantly flipped their converted into tourist unit illegally and some are gone due to construction the uma hotel is gone and others converted as on a couple of units left the trap can and the sun rewrites you illegally advertising like airbnb it is completely flipped and marketed as a techie hub for new residents with no stake in the community and the gray wood is on its way to be flipped and some are facing illegal eviction

this adds to the environment the commute people driving into their jobs from far away people who live there and have jobs something else those rich people; right? it is two of so, please reject this eir and please consider the marvel on mission instead thank you. >> thank you. i have two remaining cards diane andrew's and chris tone okay. thank you is there any additional public comment on the adequacy and accuracy of the draft environmental impact report. >> hi i think the environmental impact report is off a little bit because if it include i live on 16th street and mission i moved ♪

1948 you was 18 it is nice if you have redwood trees and built the units for housing around those woods so that i people can come out and enjoy like a small panhandle with redwood trees everything is concreteed and no redwoods so i - have a small panhandle and the environmental impact report will be - people are benefit from this because of oxygen that those redwoods into the area thank you >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening, commissioners i'm asia washington better than

that as ace on the case and i'm stopping by the love is humans commission i'm i czar the out mitigation why am and talking about parallel i got evicted from the sro plus i've been 16th street at the railway end t h c and it was - i thought i gave witness but in support of them about the planning commission because planning commission we as african-americans have problems not from you all but if planning commission in 1948 at the beginning of the urban renewable you knew it as negro renewal i have a right to speak as a two minutes to my parallel your department is being by the

progressive supervisor peskin is and so forth legislation to oversee what you're doing our a department that create not you all what city's should look like the landscape we as african-americans are in a state of emergency any other segment that complaining we're containing 20 and 30 years you not you all our predecessors planned the negro removal i'm i czar of out mitigation that was public health u put together by the 92 then mayor new lieutenant governor newsom and shifted that responsibility to mayor ed lee we worked together when he has with the hr c and no mystery if

you ask ed lee oh, asia is working on a conspiracy yes. i am a conspiracy started in 1948 kaubld did planning department so those people that are talking about all the right so say that i walked out of the royal end brought up in my marriage a obstructing u brand new city where are the people coming from they're looking like they come interest mars so - i got 3 generations looking at me papa look what they've done to the of him and repeat to the fillmore street and now the rest the community is complaining about that city by the bay my name is ace on the case and this is all

part of any community thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening, commissioners my name is a beth a lifelong resident of san francisco i've seen what is happened with the real estate market for i guess when i started pay attention about 20 i'm a homeowner but i've seen the market up and down and you know that is up right now but the reality he read over 6 thousand condos having been sold in the market is starting to slow down and those condos probably will stay vacant why do we need to build more unvariable condo outgoing i know really you

guys how are there 6 thousand vacant condos who is buying them guess what people are starting to move out not the locals but the ones that came into san francisco a few years ago and thought that would be fun you know what what kind of a legacy except for one of you many have political aspirations this is going with the people anded with the people we don't need other monster in the mission they can afford it 100 percent and that building inspection or building b will not last the tell the jury i didn't see that had been left vacant please no more

expensive out of repetitive. >> thank you. i'll call the remaining if you cards (calling names). >> i'm the president of the red stone building the historic lifework are landmark we're opposed to that project one of the big concerns peter said earlier the water table i'm actually a tenant in the basement a commercial tenant and yeah, i can tell you from the water issue if nothing is done about the water issue that will be horrible the basement floods

it is moldy and the foundation are waterlogged with is a one hundred-year-old building any kind of construction no consideration for the water table there will be a creek that flows that the building and . >> tiny sub pump that sub pump gets overwhelmed the basement floods that's a big consideration and also the impact on the shadowing of our building we want to make sure we're able to put solar panels on our building and actually, we have passed a meeting most of buildings have windows and the building is heated in the sun most of year because the landlord is two cheap to give us more heat and then personally and as part of red stone neighborhood

associations we oppose this for the gentrification bond in the middle of the mission and as a person if delores street services said folks that are adapted because they will be adapted have to move you know two or three hours away if i have to the emergency room do you want your nurse to be totally exhausted and leave scalpels inside of you and bus drivers i don't need my bus driver to have a two hour commute a because people working-class can't be or else in the city and the rich people will be calling the cops every 5 minutes every 5 minutes oh, my god someone looks at poor they

call the cops it's real we've heard stories the south of market a law passed anybody buying a new unit this is a to know about a new live entertainment those - there are poor people within one hundred feet of you, you can't call the cops you're a big jerk it you do working class people need to stay in the city with 100 percent affordable housing. >> thank you, sir. >> next speaker, please. >> >> (speaking foreign language.) >> i'm the woman thank you for your attention

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> the draft eir is insufficient it in account for associatisoica economic. >> if you benefit and many are effected. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> many are displaced and consequentially has to leave to oakland or other jurisdictions.

>> (speaking foreign language.) >> families livelihood changes as their commute times increase and travel longer distances when forced to leave the city. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the children in the vicinity that attend the school nearby that be greatly effected as the light and air will be inducted and the pollution will not be good. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> for that many oat reasons he support of alternative transportation of the marvel in the mission thank you. >> thank you.

>> next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm mary i'd like to speak out against the monster in the mission i'd like to address in terms of viral the culture and soica economical impact it is stressful for the children the community they're having to be adapt and live in the sros which is literally going from an entire agreement to congressman our things in the loved ones into one room how it effects the students and effects the communities i did a day of the dead project with any students in san francisco this last year and talking about the death of thafsh community and the death of the communication culturally so much has been taken uaw u away they walk down the streets and see the neighbors are

adapted it will have a lifelong - i lived in the mission and worked hero 40 in san francisco worked for 10 years and left and trying to come back since august this is my fourth sub let you got any job that i could live and moving place to place talk about an exhausted indicator to drive an hour and the past job i had to drive an hour out of town i got paid one hundred explores more to be teaching a day in other location in terms of educational impact is serious thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hello my name is nancy lopez and i was also working at

the marshall at the after-school program for mission graduates a couple of years ago when this project with introduced at least to the public and we saw even during after-school programs that during those 3 hours i was there with the kids how much that was effecting not only their lives and families lives but their whole communities as a whole that has a cultural soica economic effect that effects their lives nothing else and permanent he grew up moving around 5 and more time as a child we were finding a new home that effected any schooling and a lot of things those children have been diagnosed with learning disabilities and if there's construction going on they wouldn't be able to focus and their health will be

affected i've spoken to other teacher that he was sick after there was construction in oakland and had the same effect he was sick after that and the whole communities was causing - it has a really health effect especially on children and if there is traffic with the new parking lot so if we don't care about our youth than i don't know what else make sense so definitely this should be talked about more and i'm against any new construction right next to the school an 16th street and mission and oath of the developments trying to be put up definitely take the communities

voices take into consideration and the educators and especially the children so thank you. >> is there any additional public comment on the accuracy of the draft eir report seeing this portion of informational hearing is closed commissioner wu. >> thank you so i want to thank everyone from the public for coming out clearing a lot of concern over the mission with regards to eir the two eirs generally this question of looking at environmental impact is a valid one when people have to drive from vallejo or tracey or whatever to come to their jobs or get services or health care that is hadn't been methodology for being able to look at it so i think that is an issue for the

larger field this project in particular i think that the shadow impacts are very concerning both the specific impact an little marshall playground but the cumulative impact in the eastern neighborhoods eir and the recreational space is clearing need an environmental issue and of concern so i'll keep it at that to the eir i have a lot more thoughts that on or on the project. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you all for your comments the soica economic changes are outside the scope of the eir but those are valid comments and they will, take up during the time we consider the project itself you know whether or not a project for example, of market-rate causes displacement is a matter that is studied in

many places that's not what is before us today community plan exemption spoken about most of issues environmentally with this project and, of course, anything brought up about the speakers environmental issues should be addressed in comments or questions which is the case if their in fact, environmental impacts and not koala address in the community the exemption or the draft eir and as the draft eir told us that's a focus only focuses on when the shadows geology and the soil after reading that it was discovered that the issues of wind geology and soil had less than significant impacts but the one that had a significant impact is

shadow and particularly to the playground at marshall elementary school there are a lot of alternatives that was presented as part of this draft eir which is how it should be and there are quite a few of the and most of pro tem ones alternatives c that is the raised playground now realizing this does not eliminate the significant showed it does lessen the shadow to other structures that you are casting shadows on the playground and also has a side effect providing sacrifice for music rooms and classrooms and multi purpose rooms underneath where this is built alternative transportation d's e and f having various part of project

cut back making that smaller anding the impact nun in and of itself makes the shadow less but i'd like to see from the ability to have a raised playground with each of d e and f so see what kickoff on impact when we put two together and likely will make the impact less than significant particularly with f unfortunately results in fewer units and fewer affordable units as a result but i think that is important thing to look at in terms of the environmental issues surrounding this particular project so i will look for that information and when comments and responses are

published thank you. >> commissioner moore i'd like to acknowledge that each and every comment is important with the coordinator here he know all of our comments will be properly recommended and challenged some go that the eir has to address that's the nature of the hearing with a proper set up of having a court reporter here, however, the devil is in the details an ad jeff reuse a lot this is the moment to raise a couple of additional issues i permanent would like to see more information on commissioner wu touched on the broader look at the in and out commute

articulation that didn't exist at all when the eastern neighborhoods eir was present we do believe that is something we owe to ourselves not only in terms of of this project but in context with other parts of city the issue of displacement for me, i would like to see the health impact on that phenomena to be addressed the issue is acknowledged nationally as causing significant health effects on those who are have been daptdz and those who fear displacement this is a lot of a day to day sensed of uncertainty because the issue of displacement is happening while we speak there are plenty of people who are all have been adapted including discussing sros we think there are mechanisms that protect them not

seemed to be the case i have eight or ten names i personally don't know if so someone from the community brings this up it is an important that the eir stands extends and provides counter points to this issue as it happens within existed laws which we all assume here they are properly used to protect the communities another issue that is of concern the discussion of showed and i know that we have spent a lot of time in the last foe hours talking about the unavailable impacts of the shadows on the elementary school playground what is important to me is that there are two other open spaces in addition and i'm in use of force in addition to the school

play yard i'd like to see eld elevated particularly at the northeast plaza direct showed of a building that comes out for a exception and past the shadow that probably could be yielded would not be considered but it had been a code compliant project that note indeed create shadow 0 onto a space when i go to the mission not everyday is indeed a very active space with a different life every time he go there saturday night if i pass there on a friday afternoon and van ness and cob to the mission station it is a completely different community function i believe that that space has a right to be analyzed foreshadowing impacts i'de