to school building luxury homes had been taking away homes and work for many people that rely on working in the mission. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. i'm geremo 16-year-old and live in the bayview a member of the castro street i oppose this that impacts the community it will 0 cause a big shadow and who lives in a building not the people that live in the mix for a long time the building is not for protecting working families and not fair it contrasts the environmental impact report is in adequate and didn't address he did irks that displacement not name the impact of existing residents the local businesses and the fingertips that will be adapted by this project as much as the increase in the

communities for all those coming back to the mission for service and work and go to school i know many families with adapted it is not easy - we a a community came here to let he knows we support our project because the building will impact everyone in the community i support the people's plan thank you. >> thank you home share in advance. >> i'm a member of castro street i've lived in san francisco i live in bayview and potrero hill a year at lincoln i support all community fighting forever gentrification and who needs affordable housing and not luxury condo the first time does not address the issue the displacement and didn't name the

impact on existing residents local businesses and nonprofits that will displace by this project as much as increasing commute times for all those having to come back to mission for necessary service work and go to school i'm here to talk to i on the 70 should support of families that are needed how people have getting evicted by the rent and the bills are going up oppose the monsters and support of marvel in the mission adapted people in a working area they've been taking outs poor people in poor neighborhood and raising up their bills. >> thank you, mr. home share in advance. >> next speaker, please. >> i lived in san francisco

when i was 4 i lived with any family for 12 years i'm 16 a telephone grader and go to balboa park high school when i got this happening to the mission that tears me apart the people from the start this feeling that i feel for the people in the mission living in a small houses and part-time is just designation the monster is the building and shadowing the children's playground and school but i'm here for supporting the mission eve we have to protest being here to the people that live in the mission i support the mission and support in the mission i know how the mission and the other

people in the mission are going through this is because we're here to give all got to help. >> thank you, ms. lopez. >> next speaker, please. >> hi, my name is debar and i've been living in san francisco for 10 years i'm here to tell you guys do support of marvel in the mission and oppose the eir my family has been evicted once from bayview not a lot of people know that it has been hard looking for a place i know that personally and right now my dad lost his job i'm pretty sure we'll get kicked out not a lot of affordable housing my family can't afford

$3,500 on one apartment because that's how high you know not a lot of families make that much money and so - sorry this is my first time speaking. >> it's okay. it's okay. >> so, yeah i'm really sad because the culture in the mission has been going down and i'm just like the culture i feel like it needs to live admonish we've been fighting for that to keep our culture alive and as gentrification is going to be in the missions our culture will be dead >> (clapping.) >> thank you, ms. >> from the audience can please keep it's applause to raising you're hands in the air i'll appreciate it. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening. i'm keith

i've been here now for 2 two years going on i've spent 11 and a half years in the streets living out of a shooting o shopping cart now on 16th street for 10 years i'm speaking against the home sharing high-rise glass ugly your spoiling the communities as well as displacing the businesses that are there now serving us and the people off low income which live there as well i'm for any alternative that keeps the building and residents as well as keep the prices down so therefore that's my position thank you very much. >> thank you very much. >> i'll call some more cards

(calling names) my name is jonathan and i used to be homeless important several years hero in san francisco and here to actually ask to support of environmental impact report i used 0 live in the mission district and lived a block away from 16th street and mission 25 years and so i appreciate the great permit or transit i did not appreciate the crime and dangers just this week a murder on 16th street and mission i remember the murder out of wells fargo this is not a gentrification. >> excuse me - folks excuse me - folks no outbursts please. i was homeless i a member of the

san francisco i lived enernex next door to hundred by the transit american it doesn't hurt us to live next door to wealthy to house protecting and help lower-income people within two blocks of 1979 mission 6 hundred plus units of housing for homeless and thousand unions for low income seniors and individuals and families i mean some many projects rich with protecting housing and if would be great to have some other other kind of income in that neighborhood any friend beverly was evicted both months ago she made two of money to quality thooes she's and nonprofit

working she's in concord 1979 mission is offered to build housing we need to have the compassion for everyone we need to have unity between all these classes we can't afford housing wars we need to build housing i support it plaza 16 coalition but went to singapore last year a real eye openers seeing one millions units of home sharings high-rise and it was not rental homeownership so i know that we and build housing and not be faired of change and move both the 21st century or we'll be

left behind a third world country. >> good evening. i'm shawn norris i am a lifetime resident and i'm in opposition to the monster on mission a lot of people made a lot of comments i'm here to talk about the shadow impact and the airport environmental impact report we haven't mentioned the specifics what that does to the mash elementary and the playground there have been studies there's been medical studies where vitamin dpshz can ready to

depreciation and depreciation this is something that effects the communities and kids in development you know they're trying to have has thank you - i'm in support of model on mission and in support of the communities taking control over their own development and saying what they president in in their community instead of an outside agency doing things that effect the health of the community and people around them you know and asking about who this is for

you know thinking about our serve of the people already in the community or people trying to more often and take into account how this will displace and effect other people in the neighborhood that they presume to want to be part of yeah - thank you for your time and i hope you guys are will very heavy consider our decisions will accepting or not. >> thank you, sir. >> good evening, commissioners want to address a couple of particular he means it in the draft eir that are of concern today, i want to speak principally as a member of the red stone template association a

5013 of the wltd hundred building in san francisco one of the concerns we would like to see thoroughly address our water table concerns that buildings in 2, 3, 4 area uncommon have water issues because these projects are all resting on top of mission creek and not uncommon to center consistently water problems and they can, of course, be extremely exasperated duce to lag scale underground construction secondly, i want to talk about the traffic impacts which are in the adequately addressed here this draft eir seems to defer the traffic impacts to the eastern neighborhoods eir

traffic studies if i'm seeing it correctly and we don't believe that eardrum environmental review adequately studies it studies a quantify general elements but doesn't look at what is happening in on the ground manageable and being merged in the taking into account the long reserve consultants and the out commutes we are we know that you are happening and not take into account the mission families are making long and sometimes daily consultants from arn attack to drop kids off at school and shop at the stores and going to their jobs this was not anticipated in this eastern neighborhoods environmental impact report this is also where their

services many of the organizations that have representatives hero that services overseeing communities are located you have to come hero to get the service centers they don't exist on the out curiosities of area nbc report said a new study by the transportation authority confirms commuting in the student is an absolute crawl because the eastern neighborhoods eir did not correctly assess what was going to happen with traffic lastly i don't think i don't think it take into account the goorlg bus to quote supervisor eric mar the horrible impacts of those many shuttles. >> thank you, sir you'll call some more names

(calling names). >> hi my name is v with the plazas 16 accreditation and coalition action network we've been living in the mission singles 2011 a worker and consumer that seize with gentrification don't so a neighborhood i live near to the plaza 16 bart station and i personally use the following businesses (calling names) vietnam market on 16th street the burger king located at 16th street street and mission chinese restaurant on 16th street and the walgreens on mission street the only business i don't use is the city club on

the 5 businesses will be adapted once you approve the project at 1979 mission and i wanted to - people have talked about the shadow on mash school playground they have a solar panel here we are with rising tides and love people and industry rely on fossil fuel their trying to teach the young people will alternative energy our impacting not just a shadow on the elementary school but the future the planet the type of fuel we'll be using to power our industries and so we're effecting the future the environment and the future and the impacts will be more congestion and pollution and the associating economic impact a

rip emancipation proclamation he will effect due to this once you approve a 10 story luxury complex other landlord might be able to get more out of their tenants we don't want to see more people burn out of their homes for the sake of raising their rent more for their money so i'm very concerned for all those reasons what we need it affordable housing that is aesthetically please carry on conversations out in the hallway. and with a design i don't want to see class walker i think the common ground we need the tech co-workers need it,too i was recently at the salesforce knowing they can't afford 5 or $10,000 a month some of them

have homeless we all need affordable housing please support of marvel on mission thank you, thank you ms. gwen. >> next speaker, please. >> thank you are we good commissioners good evening my name is larry and i'm happy to be here this evening thank you for hanging in there for some many hours i want to point out one thing based on the number of things i've heard tonight this particular project is not displacing any residents

this project you know is very much needed in san francisco and in the mission district because of the amount of housing that that provides in a transit rich area so that's one alcohol, tobacco & firearms things i wanted to mention the other thing related to the eir just wanted to mention that has i reviewed it i noticed the geology are studied in the internal revenue and confused by that because sun's excavation adjacent to bart will be governed by bart and the structural plan that be reviewed by bart and the department of building inspection it me this would be done active and

inauspicious excuse me - folks it is unnecessary everyone gets 3 minutes to speak it is disruptive and inconsiderate. >> thank you good evening. i'm dwayne i realized i resides within the mission district a client of the resource center i must say a welcoming entity within the city i am currently homeless highly share that so people understand that coming to this city from the complete oppose side of the in fact, and seeking the resources to not continue to remain on the streets of all the right away centers i've been to the city i prefer and recommend

the neighborhood resource center overall not saying anything against anyone they've catered to my needs more than anyone in the neighborhood saying that i say that to say if this project is approved and this resource center is adapted people like me trying to go to school and work and support the community that supports me it makes it hard i don't think that it is fair for somebody to - i'm currently self-employed i'll appreciate affordable housing i don't think that is right for something i feel abag because i don't perform a certain job or because i don't pursue a career i'm not entitled to live where i

want to live that's not fair i'm speaking on myself i deliver food on a bicycle, the impact on traffic would be just i feel like it would be terrible not only for myself by others i'm a bike. >> and last i have to say for the people behind me if i want to after i want them to have affordable housing when they get to my age and such i think that affordable housing is should be people over profit people before profit that's how i think. >> thank you, mr. feat mr. weaver. >> i'm scott weaver wanted to clarify the shadow impact it was

said earlier the developer agreed to raise the gown it has a mitigation of the shadow impact as a matter of fact, 3 alternative transportation and all 3 were substantial and you think avoidable showed impact an marshall playground not an academic exercise this is a playground where kids play everyday during recess and lunch and after school it is unique no playgrounds in the immediate area suitable for children of elementary school age is in the just an academic thing but a serious type of environmental impact that you may want to ask for further exploration by the planning department we've talked about displacement

and we've talked about it's actual impact on the environment displacement keep your eyes on the ball heavier traffic and displacement causes green house gas we may august that causes displacement but look at valencia and other less than market-rate built and see how it district has changed instead of buying doughnuts people bow $6 crew santsz not the doughnut that doughnut seller had to go somewhere and displacement was not assessed i don't think that was assessed in the eir and if it was it would be hard to believe the eir anticipated the level of displacement we've seen

between 2008 and 2016 that simply wouldn't is anticipated the level of displacement and it's impacts on traffic and so forth now i could be wrong it's not the first time i was wrong about something all the people said it will not cause displacement so when it comes up. conditional use user your evaluating with the emergency rooms whether or not there is a associate economic impact you should know that the department should be telling you you one other thing about the sro hotels you need to ask the department to look at what is happening in the sro in the mission you need to know that it is your job the department is not telling you it

is your job to demand of the department what is going on in the sro hotels and figure out how to mitigate the problems we're already seeing thank you >> thank you, mr. weaver. >> come on up. >> come on up ma'am, come on up. >> good afternoon. i'm martin with the mission sro families program mission collaborative at delores street our family serves over 50 families and children in the mission lynn in single-room occupancy hotels and we're here to you know offer a perspective from the work we do we support of no project alternative your consideration of the project the monster in the mission and the

involuntarily assessment being reviewed we see your acts a as a treat to the tenants the environmental assessment ignores children and their voting rights to a healthy living environment singles i worked in the mission in january, the monster the response from community outreach is hostility the not the assessment when i visit the sro families with the outreach workers i see children that want to play and run down the halls in the hotels they can't do that they have limited public space and the green space to play in near their home environment and in fact, the signs posted for savior penalties if shrn or

children are making too much noise they put the people alters risk at marble marshall high school and spent programming there so they can be having that outlet they can't do that in the hotel and not affordable housing to go to and it puts our kids and families health at risk the environmental assessment we're not stupid and then insult to say this will not displace any families in the mission and should not be approved request the sro families imagined this project the depress it causes the impacts our sro their anybody elseal well-being with working with the stressers to survive in the mission in puts our divorce well-being at risk and seeing imagining inbe effective - this - you can't

separate the social impacts when we talk about the impacts you need to consider those families i leave but with the powering outreach worker that had to leave early because this meeting was projected this topic we don't need a monster in the mission we need assessable housing i feel if this environmental assessment goes forward our supporting further displacement of our families in the mission. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hi my name is diane i'm with the sro collaborative a program of the lower street community services i'm here to speak about the socially

economic impacts the first time i urge a no project alternative the draft eir is inadequate didn't talk about the facts of displacement of the local businesses nonprofits and tenants such as myself it hurts the children and from the noise from the construction that disruptive the children's environment for two academic years and hurt my community because this project will drive a up the cost of living and more and more people are getting evicted people needed stable housing affordable housing will be unable to afford the rent if this is built the property values in the neighborhood will go up i urge a no project

alternative. >> the next speaker can come on up i'll call more people (calling names). >> hi good evening i'm sorry diana martin's i work with a program under the delores street the dir is inadequate because it does not talk about the effects of the displacement of local businesses nonprofits and the tenants now i specifically want to talk about how displacement what effect the traffic and pollution in the area this commute that is effected by the displacement is can really, really impact the air in the area can you imagine the effects that the extra pollution has on the community

that lives there we as the rock have surveyed the tenants in the sros and mission we found so many health conditions that the sro tenants are dealing with as related bronchitis an array of health problems do we want to add pollution in the area that would add to their health now also the construction would add dust asbestos all kinds of tings that make the air you think reasonable and not just hurting the folks but the students and the tenants in general so this construction would add so much problems and it is really going to hurt those who are there in the areas it is insufficient it didn't

discuss the as i said the problems with the displacement sros are constantly flipped their converted into tourist unit illegally and some are gone due to construction the uma hotel is gone and others converted as on a couple of units left the trap can and the sun rewrites you illegally advertising like airbnb it is completely flipped and marketed as a techie hub for new residents with no stake in the community and the gray wood is on its way to be flipped and some are facing illegal eviction this adds to the environment the commute people driving into their jobs from far away people

who live there and have jobs something else those rich people; right? it is two of so, please reject this eir and please consider the marvel on mission instead thank you. >> thank you. i have two remaining cards diane andrew's and chris tone okay. thank you is there any additional public comment on the adequacy and accuracy of the draft environmental impact report. >> hi i think the environmental impact report is off a little bit because if it include i live on 16th street and mission i moved ♪ 1948 you was 18 it is nice if you have redwood trees and built

the units for housing around those woods so that i people can come out and enjoy like a small panhandle with redwood trees everything is concreteed and no redwoods so i - have a small panhandle and the environmental impact report will be - people are benefit from this because of oxygen that those redwoods into the area thank you >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening, commissioners i'm asia washington better than that as ace on the case and i'm stopping by the love is humans

commission i'm i czar the out mitigation why am and talking about parallel i got evicted from the sro plus i've been 16th street at the railway end t h c and it was - i thought i gave witness but in support of them about the planning commission because planning commission we as african-americans have problems not from you all but if planning commission in 1948 at the beginning of the urban renewable you knew it as negro renewal i have a right to speak as a two minutes to my parallel your department is being by the progressive supervisor peskin is and so forth legislation to

oversee what you're doing our a department that create not you all what city's should look like the landscape we as african-americans are in a state of emergency any other segment that complaining we're containing 20 and 30 years you not you all our predecessors planned the negro removal i'm i czar of out mitigation that was public health u put together by the 92 then mayor new lieutenant governor newsom and shifted that responsibility to mayor ed lee we worked together when he has with the hr c and no mystery if you ask ed lee oh, asia is working on a conspiracy yes. i

am a conspiracy started in 1948 kaubld did planning department so those people that are talking about all the right so say that i walked out of the royal end brought up in my marriage a obstructing u brand new city where are the people coming from they're looking like they come interest mars so - i got 3 generations looking at me papa look what they've done to the of him and repeat to the fillmore street and now the rest the community is complaining about that city by the bay my name is ace on the case and this is all part of any community thank you.

>> next speaker, please. >> good evening, commissioners my name is a beth a lifelong resident of san francisco i've seen what is happened with the real estate market for i guess when i started pay attention about 20 i'm a homeowner but i've seen the market up and down and you know that is up right now but the reality he read over 6 thousand condos having been sold in the market is starting to slow down and those condos probably will stay vacant why do we need to build more unvariable condo outgoing i know really you guys how are there 6 thousand vacant condos who is buying them

guess what people are starting to move out not the locals but the ones that came into san francisco a few years ago and thought that would be fun you know what what kind of a legacy except for one of you many have political aspirations this is going with the people anded with the people we don't need other monster in the mission they can afford it 100 percent and that building inspection or building b will not last the tell the jury i didn't see that had been left vacant please no more expensive out of repetitive.

>> thank you. i'll call the remaining if you cards (calling names). >> i'm the president of the red stone building the historic lifework are landmark we're opposed to that project one of the big concerns peter said earlier the water table i'm actually a tenant in the basement a commercial tenant and yeah, i can tell you from the water issue if nothing is done about the water issue that will be horrible the basement floods it is moldy and the foundation are waterlogged with is a one

hundred-year-old building any kind of construction no consideration for the water table there will be a creek that flows that the building and . >> tiny sub pump that sub pump gets overwhelmed the basement floods that's a big consideration and also the impact on the shadowing of our building we want to make sure we're able to put solar panels on our building and actually, we have passed a meeting most of buildings have windows and the building is heated in the sun most of year because the landlord is two cheap to give us more heat and then personally and as part of red stone neighborhood associations we oppose this for the gentrification bond in the middle of the mission and as a

person if delores street services said folks that are adapted because they will be adapted have to move you know two or three hours away if i have to the emergency room do you want your nurse to be totally exhausted and leave scalpels inside of you and bus drivers i don't need my bus driver to have a two hour commute a because people working-class can't be or else in the city and the rich people will be calling the cops every 5 minutes every 5 minutes oh, my god someone looks at poor they call the cops it's real we've

heard stories the south of market a law passed anybody buying a new unit this is a to know about a new live entertainment those - there are poor people within one hundred feet of you, you can't call the cops you're a big jerk it you do working class people need to stay in the city with 100 percent affordable housing. >> thank you, sir. >> next speaker, please. >> >> (speaking foreign language.) >> i'm the woman thank you for your attention >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the draft eir is

insufficient it in account for associatisoica economic. >> if you benefit and many are effected. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> many are displaced and consequentially has to leave to oakland or other jurisdictions. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> families livelihood changes

as their commute times increase and travel longer distances when forced to leave the city. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> the children in the vicinity that attend the school nearby that be greatly effected as the light and air will be inducted and the pollution will not be good. >> (speaking foreign language.) >> for that many oat reasons he support of alternative transportation of the marvel in the mission thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hello, i'm mary i'd like to speak out against the monster in

the mission i'd like to address in terms of viral the culture and soica economical impact it is stressful for the children the community they're having to be adapt and live in the sros which is literally going from an entire agreement to congressman our things in the loved ones into one room how it effects the students and effects the communities i did a day of the dead project with any students in san francisco this last year and talking about the death of thafsh community and the death of the communication culturally so much has been taken uaw u away they walk down the streets and see the neighbors are adapted it will have a lifelong

- i lived in the mission and worked hero 40 in san francisco worked for 10 years and left and trying to come back since august this is my fourth sub let you got any job that i could live and moving place to place talk about an exhausted indicator to drive an hour and the past job i had to drive an hour out of town i got paid one hundred explores more to be teaching a day in other location in terms of educational impact is serious thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hello my name is nancy lopez and i was also working at the marshall at the after-school program for mission graduates a

couple of years ago when this project with introduced at least to the public and we saw even during after-school programs that during those 3 hours i was there with the kids how much that was effecting not only their lives and families lives but their whole communities as a whole that has a cultural soica economic effect that effects their lives nothing else and permanent he grew up moving around 5 and more time as a child we were finding a new home that effected any schooling and a lot of things those children have been diagnosed with learning disabilities and if there's construction going on they wouldn't be able to focus and their health will be affected i've spoken to other teacher that he was sick after

there was construction in oakland and had the same effect he was sick after that and the whole communities was causing - it has a really health effect especially on children and if there is traffic with the new parking lot so if we don't care about our youth than i don't know what else make sense so definitely this should be talked about more and i'm against any new construction right next to the school an 16th street and mission and oath of the developments trying to be put up definitely take the communities voices take into consideration and the educators and especially the children so thank you.

>> is there any additional public comment on the accuracy of the draft eir report seeing this portion of informational hearing is closed commissioner wu. >> thank you so i want to thank everyone from the public for coming out clearing a lot of concern over the mission with regards to eir the two eirs generally this question of looking at environmental impact is a valid one when people have to drive from vallejo or tracey or whatever to come to their jobs or get services or health care that is hadn't been methodology for being able to look at it so i think that is an issue for the larger field this project in particular i think that the shadow impacts

are very concerning both the specific impact an little marshall playground but the cumulative impact in the eastern neighborhoods eir and the recreational space is clearing need an environmental issue and of concern so i'll keep it at that to the eir i have a lot more thoughts that on or on the project. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you all for your comments the soica economic changes are outside the scope of the eir but those are valid comments and they will, take up during the time we consider the project itself you know whether or not a project for example, of market-rate causes displacement is a matter that is studied in many places that's not what is

before us today community plan exemption spoken about most of issues environmentally with this project and, of course, anything brought up about the speakers environmental issues should be addressed in comments or questions which is the case if their in fact, environmental impacts and not koala address in the community the exemption or the draft eir and as the draft eir told us that's a focus only focuses on when the shadows geology and the soil after reading that it was discovered that the issues of wind geology and soil had less than significant impacts but the one that had a significant impact is shadow and particularly to the

playground at marshall elementary school there are a lot of alternatives that was presented as part of this draft eir which is how it should be and there are quite a few of the and most of pro tem ones alternatives c that is the raised playground now realizing this does not eliminate the significant showed it does lessen the shadow to other structures that you are casting shadows on the playground and also has a side effect providing sacrifice for music rooms and classrooms and multi purpose rooms underneath where this is built alternative transportation d's e and f having various part of project cut back making that smaller

anding the impact nun in and of itself makes the shadow less but i'd like to see from the ability to have a raised playground with each of d e and f so see what kickoff on impact when we put two together and likely will make the impact less than significant particularly with f unfortunately results in fewer units and fewer affordable units as a result but i think that is important thing to look at in terms of the environmental issues surrounding this particular project so i will look for that information and when comments and responses are published thank you. >> commissioner moore i'd like

to acknowledge that each and every comment is important with the coordinator here he know all of our comments will be properly recommended and challenged some go that the eir has to address that's the nature of the hearing with a proper set up of having a court reporter here, however, the devil is in the details an ad jeff reuse a lot this is the moment to raise a couple of additional issues i permanent would like to see more information on commissioner wu touched on the broader look at the in and out commute articulation that didn't exist at all when the eastern neighborhoods eir was present we

do believe that is something we owe to ourselves not only in terms of of this project but in context with other parts of city the issue of displacement for me, i would like to see the health impact on that phenomena to be addressed the issue is acknowledged nationally as causing significant health effects on those who are have been daptdz and those who fear displacement this is a lot of a day to day sensed of uncertainty because the issue of displacement is happening while we speak there are plenty of people who are all have been adapted including discussing sros we think there are mechanisms that protect them not seemed to be the case i have

eight or ten names i personally don't know if so someone from the community brings this up it is an important that the eir stands extends and provides counter points to this issue as it happens within existed laws which we all assume here they are properly used to protect the communities another issue that is of concern the discussion of showed and i know that we have spent a lot of time in the last foe hours talking about the unavailable impacts of the shadows on the elementary school playground what is important to me is that there are two other open spaces in addition and i'm in use of force in addition to the school play yard i'd like to see eld

elevated particularly at the northeast plaza direct showed of a building that comes out for a exception and past the shadow that probably could be yielded would not be considered but it had been a code compliant project that note indeed create shadow 0 onto a space when i go to the mission not everyday is indeed a very active space with a different life every time he go there saturday night if i pass there on a friday afternoon and van ness and cob to the mission station it is a completely different community function i believe that that space has a right to be analyzed foreshadowing impacts i'd like to see that including what sunlight means to the bart plaza

i see people wait for their families to come off of bart mothers with their children and shopping things waiting there i want to see a larger discussion in this eir those were any comments at that moment and probably submit additional comments. >> commissioner hillis. >> i echo my fellow commissioners want to raise two quick issues after i think that is that would be great to look at the eir kind of maximum affordable housing alternative or variance land dedication that gets the affordable housing percentages increased it would be that would be helpful to look at that option as a variance alternative in the eir and then we heard a good deal about parking and whether the

parking is causing the building to be perhaps too high or bulky i don't think any of the alternative transportation looked at the no parking lot alternative but one that eliminates that and perhaps uses it for other uses and bring down the side of the building to reduce other impacts i ask you to add those. >> thank you my personal thoughts i've read the document here i guess the digest i started to delve into it what's the last date to submit comments. >> july 15th and the comment closes on july 5th assassinate 5 o'clock. >> i understand to understand tennis the beast on bryant last

week this project was affordable percentage and they need to comply with the codes the current code i don't have the specific information at this time. >> okay. okay thank you. >> but we would provide whatever it available. >> thank you i agree with commissioner hillis that on affordable housing maximize affordable housing would be a good thing to understand i do think that the transportation 10 years ago when the eastern neighborhood plan was adopted and constructed was very different world i really want to understand whether or not we're dealing with in terms of google buses ride hale apps and out mitigation and in immigration whether on acid

test and the vehicle miles traveled we don't understand the bmt for the immigration i'd like to see that i have a hard time having a development sitting on top of a bart station having no parking other than car share it didn't feel right. i sat in the eastern neighborhoods construction and adoption and came up well but .4 spaces is way too high i know that people own cars we talk about the future for when those parking spaces have no use they'll not have use and time to figure that out and understand why this much parking is asked for on top of

bart's station with people for housing and also talking about environmental issues and things like that yet we see projects that don't sit on top of van ness bart and a muni station had a 5 ratio i didn't support i don't understand - i understand the environmental is c the raised playground in section h at the end of the report, however, significant unavoidable the school gets a structure they could use for different other activities on top of what is the playground would still have shadow impacts but don't understand any alternative that is available beyond that that could myth that i don't understand permanent or personally i'm not a father and

no children that maybe someone can talk about the lack of sunlight on school-aged conditioner with going back to a 10 by 10 room with their family some of the children do get during the day or after school could be avoided but i understand the additional active room structure is good for the school and the children as well i don't have the mission interim controls under which this project is subject i know in that document for a project for the cu would grants are not granted it talks about the effect on a host of issues which a good portion of them a soica economic how it impacts the

displacement of businesses so even though we don't have a soica economic component in under ceqa the interim controls should pickup that up there was an report for the emeralds a sub component he read it when i first became a commissioner that was not adopted i want to understand the interim controls overlaying it how document or on the money and help to inform whatever documentation needs to be handed in under our sdmdz something i'm raise that issue for the other issues mentioned by the conversion of the sro hotels to tourist hotels on short-term rentals all that needs to be turned in to into

the enforcements planning and planning department we understand exactly what is happening i think the short-term rentals legislation that was passed should go a long time with the interim controls up to thirty days the other portion of this we have approved demolition of a multi story building down to the frame next to a school willing over the top of a school in the neighborhood i'm concerned again, the health of the children i want to make sure that the plan the project sponsor has for the construction all that stuff a well documented and he had community understand that should this project move forward i think that is the third project we've had literally next to a school probably one of the bigger ones we have the second biggest we're

not demolishing a big building we are demolishing a small one but the healthy is a paramount concern and probably have additional comments by july 5th thank you for coming out today commissioner moore. >> one additional comment i'd like to add that is i'd like to see as to who it elevates the playground with a proper response to playground i'm concerned that in the long run noise impacts will be xrand by the neighbors sitting above the playground good school buffer their schools with landscaping and i'd like the eir to find the

analogs in the long run between what we encourage to be an each time we should be prepared so have reading this environmental impact report provides that is indeed a viable each time not to talk about the winds impacts these are small children only one sport place i know in the bayview that's at tense court eased uc berkley up telegraph avenue and it is a parking garage a tense court on the top and most people laugh about that it was done way back in the 60s and early san jose and a good idea didn't work here adults playing on top of a garage wanted to be

explored children's playground are loud they're loud that's the nature of what they are we i have no speaker cards. understand if there are impacts. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. once again i think that is important as we go to comments and responses staff try to subsequent traffic patterns and we really have to look at some numbers and subtion has to how ohio how the developments since the time of the community plan with the eastern neighborhoods eir was complete and the final thing is although this is way ahead of us we have to look at the architecture and

make sure it is conceptually and fits in with the mission district and this is a massing usually the case yeah. something that has that's right something that has a little bit more of the revival style in the mission district probably a lot better facade. >> okay one last closing comment to the members of the public i don't know what the gosh i'm losing my train of thought marvel the marvel how much shadows it indicatcasts whateve marvel looks like there that be environmental impact with a no project alternative so whatever comes on this site around the part of that we'll have some

impact this is a disproportionate of item that is closed and puts us in general public comment do i have any speakers for general public comment? seeing none, general public comment is closed. the meeting is adjourned. >> working for the city and county of san francisco will immerse you in a vibrate and dynamic city on sfroert of the art and social change we've been

on the edge after all we're at the meeting of land and sea world-class style it is the burn of blew jeans where the rock holds court over the harbor the city's information technology xoflz work on the rulers project for free wifi and developing projects and insuring patient state of at san francisco general hospital our it professionals make guilty or innocent available and support the house/senate regional wear-out system your our employees joy excessive salaries but working for the city and county of san francisco give us employees the unities to contribute their ideas and energy and commitment to shape

the city's future but for considering a career with the city and county of san francisc. >> ladies and gentlemen, the chair has called the meeting to order can you please take our seats? ladies and gentlemen, the chair has called the meeting to order can you please turn off our electronic devices they tend to interfere with the microphone in the room rise for the allegiance and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under god,

indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. >> commissioner president loftus i'd like to call roll. >> please do sergeant. >> commissioner president loftus commissioner vice president turman is excused commissioner marshall commissioner dejesus commissioner mazzuco commissioner wong commissioner melara is excused commissioner president loftus you have a quorum also with us the chief of police tony chap man and director of occ joyce hicks. >> welcome i want to welcome everyone to the first of two meetings on the use of force policies as you can see this is a different agenda not no city hall but around the city coming out to give us on the use of force policies a long time in the making and a chance to hear from you about where we're added before we make final decisions i want to clarify the agenda i got

folks asking any discussion item we always have public comment immediately after that note spiveng lots lists on the agenda the point of meeting to say a use of force presentation and everyone has the opportunity to do public comment we start by introducing ourselves as commissioners and what we do in our day job i'll go ahead and start with commissioner mazzucco. >> thank you for helping us going the use of force general order i'm a defense lawyer and before that a assistant district attorney and a united states attorney for about 9 years and my wife and i are natures and live in san francisco. >> my name is a petra an attorney and been on the commission 9 nature years i'm a native san franciscan and happy

to be here talking about the under the influence of drugs and afterwards we'll talk about the next step and on june 22nd and i think people are interested in hearing that and commissioner president loftus has an answer for us thank you. >> commissioner wong. >> or commissioner marshall sorry. >> commissioner marshall i - been on the commission a long time. >> good evening i've been a civil rights attorney for many years and on the use of force. >> my name is suv's an interest in the city raising my three children had he my mom awesome she's watching a native san franciscan aon the commission for 4 nature years i want to talk about the clarification on the agenda we have 3w0i6kd the decision what

are called conducted didn't see commonly known and tasers we'll not be subject of this discussion and not dui the bulletin prototyped by the department or at the next meeting june 2nd the incarnation wanted us to talk about that 2 will be premature to talk about that and depend on the open on r oracle of that vicinity we'll not have had a chance for a public hearing on tasers two policies that were before us many issues to discuss that's the focus of our discussion tonight sergeant killshaw. >> presentation of general orders use of force draft policies versions one and two discussion please note no discussion regarding the devices will be discussed three

quarters. >> chief chaplain. >> for this presentation it will be deputy chief donovan and captain hart. >> do you want to give us an introduction or go ahead thank you, chief. >> sorry about that good evening commissioner president loftus and commissioners chief chaplain, director joyce hicks i'm deputy chief garrett and with me jack an attorney i'm not an attorney we'll give you a summary of the use of force policy and the timeline that is provision if december 9th to present and commissioner president loftus directed the department to update general orders 5.01 use of force policy and here to present this power

point presentation will be captain jack hart. >> good evening, commissioners and community wanted to while i'm on attorney not a sxert in the use of force policies but doing research with the different commissions meetings so to sort of introduce you for public comment and to try and get everyone on the on the same page how we got here and where we're hoping to go want to give you a quick summary on december 9, 2015, commissioner president loftus directed the department to have a draft of use of force to present in 2016 january 6 of the commission meeting directed to have several community members of the committee 4 that were held from the bayview why to bodecker park organized to hear voices to get the community input of what you guys wanted in a policy

there we go so february 10th sfpd presented 3 distinct draft policies and over 23 stakeholders groups have written and verbal recommendations to the dependent on those 3 use of force policies i see a giant list of people involved in the working group including the police and the office of complaints and the aclu and crisis intervention go teams and coalition on homelessness and human right commission community safety initiate and other different tech groups many people are at the table on may 4, 2016, commission meeting the commission agreed to draft a second reverberation of the use of force policies this is based on the julia electronically and the bar association of san francisco wrote about a 19 page memorandum of points of authorities raising

sub irks for the commission and pretty much that entire meeting was directed here's some of the language to discuss incorporating the languages proposed by stakeholder for the opening patrol officer with the shall when feasible instead of - the patrol officer regarding are promoted we'll talk about all of these and stakeholders regarding pointing of firearms and adding 4 additional factors to determine whether use of force was reasonable and adding words on the xrnlg about spiritual responsibility and adding community stakeholders suggested language about data collection requirements so a couple of days after that that's with the doj provide a memorandum and expert

comments that memorandum contained overall comments on the use of force combining the 3 separate policies into one policy a definition section and including that description the use of force and impact weapons and to the roles of supervisors that might be out there on the scene and including physical controls against vulnerable population and doj's to other policies to provide adequate information and direction to the offers and recommending the department review the final report over the 21st century task force on policing the doj's had a comment about the subject matter are experts made suggestions on 3 separate policies from various members of law enforcement and summarized for the member of the cops office office the memorandum were posted on the website that's a good thing to note the

police website has all the documents available for downloading and a summon document on the back table in you need a copy and note those mou suggestion not go attributed to the experts they were a summary documented and not all the experts agreed to as a southern stance this is what the department or police commission should do on may 11th commission go discusses the memorandum and suggestions and commissioner president loftus announced a use of force subcommittee on may 30th the commission crafted doj's want to 1 baseline the discussions of may 2016 meeting and the doj's memorandum and added suggestions the 3 policies were combined into verlgs one and version 2 as a result of the

- when the memorandum came from the u.s. department of justice they are recommendations were adam to both versions one and two and that's why there's two versions that's the best way to summarize. >> so specification that are in each the policies we'll start with version one to make sure we have clarification to help inform our. first at various places the term should or when feasible are used and it should means per must have been and recommended with the doj's 302 that defines the word and more discretion as opposed to shall and varies places imminent and threat that means impending applies something that about to occur this is imminent immensity areas immediate we'd like to discuss in version 2 at various places

the term reasonable force an subject word that comes from the supreme court case law when an officer with the same or similar experience from the same or similar circumstances acts in a a same or similar way that is the reasonable officer stance >> just. >> oh, we lost power. >> lost power. >> captain hart maybe. >> read the next patrol officer but a long paragraph. >> this is the opening photographer of version one the san francisco police department highest priority is safeguarding the sanctity of how life demonstrate this shall demonstrate in their communities

their sworn so serve and used deesclation principles before reporting to the use of force whenever feasible and the police code of ethics is all law enforcement officers to carry out their duties to never employ unreasonable force with the community and safeguarding the public trust okay. >> you're out of order we are here to actually change the policies i'll presenter public comment at the end thank you. go ahead captain. >> the section about proportionality and in version one the state requires the officers use only the degree of force for 9 accomplishment of the duties the degree shall be to the severity of the offense or the threat to human life the privilege if require the officers from users reasonable

force to overcome athlete or overcome resistance that is consistent with the reasonable force and once again we'll compare another one from version one that differs from version 22, 3, 4 section 3 a list of other factors that determine the reasonableness the additional factors not in reverberation two a few of those factors number of officers and number of subject age size and relate strength of the officers and specialized knowledge and skills like mixed mash arts and prior contacted or exhaustion of the officers and to a type of weapon available to the subject and time for the officers 0 make a decision those didn't make it in version two but in the use of force updated in april of 2016 and on a chart

on page 2 dash 4 those are where the terms and conditions came from and lethal force this is the language in version one an officer may use obviously reasonable force to protect himself or anothers for imminent death arrest serious bodily injury or the escape of a felon when the subject as committed a felon use the threat of deadly force and physical harm to the public or the officer in the use of lethal force is necessary and when feasible some wavrj before the lethal force is used and the last big difference the restraint is available a choke move or an arm across the throat it prohibited the cardio is pressure to the side of neck and

in version one it is considered to be a deadly force option that raise a high much currently today version two so version two is created to the recommendations of the bar association here's a couple quick things different number one various places throughout the document shall when feasible is used instead of should when feasible that's the difference between is peer groups that they had and the term shall means mandatory this requires the officers to take without determination e discretion they must do is and the terms immediate and men, women, and children immediate threat that means happening right now and implies something that occurring at the this moment that is different from imminent imneglect is about to occur and those are the difference between version one

and two and number 3 at various places in the documents minimal force is used instead of reasonable and minimum is the least amount of force to bring a subject under control and the community and community shoulder want to use quote in the community so the opening photographer in version two so i'll point out that is still san francisco police department highest proprietor is safeguarding the sanctity of all human life. >> this is version two. >> please continue captain. >> go back one the opening paragraph the san francisco police department highest priorities is safeguarding the sanctity of all human life in the daily subcontractors and accomplishing the police commission with replace on the

minimal use of force that is different from version one accomplish the policy with the minimum use of force and communication and crisis intervention and deesclation principles before reporting to force. >> you're out of order i don't want to have to remove anyone everyone what say what they're trying to say we're about at public comment you'll get the mike and none what interrupt you captain go ahead. >> okay. >> so the law enforcement police code of ethics is the officers catering out their duties and never employ unnecessary force those are the key factors for the legitimacy of the public trust and the promoter r are protocol it is for the level of force be proportional or the threat posed to human life the officer is taking action that is important

to apply those when countering a subject armed with a weapon and baseball bat or bottle over and over other object that that is difference from version one to two explaining weapons other than firearms that is what the officers are to consciously know about the promoter and the officers may only use the use of force to accomplish their duties next slide the reasonableness is not including the factors in verlgs one we covered so and so so i think we can continue on to the next one so this one is key i think important as well and a distinction between version one and two you should know about talks about when is the obviously to use ineligible force to protect himself or another when reasonably believed

to be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury or a felon when the officer is building their attempted to use ineligibility force with physical harm to the officers or the public apprehensive is delayed it is reasonable necessary to prevent the escape but here's the key added to verse 2 is that language that is up for debate lethal force shall, experienced with all reasonable alternative transportation have been exhausted or appear un- it prohibits the reasonable constraint putting your arm in a bar choke is a cardio threat and that's in version 2 so next slide

items open for decision but the commission remaining things you'll be discussing over the next few weeks you my have input whether the california code should be included in the policy in 0 bog version some of the department of justice comments they don't see an issue and no doj commits it is state law on the books e books and the so number one number 2 a list eve sergeant requirement for subject armed with a weapon should be listed in the policy currently the list of requirement is both versions some doj experts felt this better if training and some want the clarification of language so it goes back to the last commission meeting the commissioners discussed is this pop o policy or procedure and

both and how detailed did you want to get both that commissioner melara brought that up and number 3 whether to use the term unremarkable or unnecessary and the stakeholders wanted unnecessary so doj recommend reporting out physical control as the use of force or reporting all use of force that - whether or not this is an injury or complaint of pain none of those are in version one or two and finally department s m e taqueria outburst restriction and the current training tech teaches the weapon over the officers headpiece outdated and in both one and two so and finally this

is why we're here on june 1st, the commission prepared to discuss those two draft versions and the community meetings will be here to provide our comments that concludes my presentation. thank you. >> thank you, captain hart so you should have tracked version 1 and 23 captain hart explained the difference the commission will have a vicinity this is designed to hear from everyone folks want to line up two minutes to the that everyone given the same exact amount of time we'll hear from everyone and with that, come on up. >> and your police commission secretary will let you know when

your time is up. >> good evening and welcome. >> ms. brown. >> good evening, everyone i'm here again concerning my son aubrey abrakasa who was murder august 14, 2006, to a semiautomatic gun thirty rounds of bullets left that gun and to my son this day his a case is not solved i'm looking for resolution 0 on my sons case i died in front of where i live i'm hearing his case is being looked at now i'm hoping that some resolution will come from that i'm not being told the same thing every year no one is coming forth no evidence

i want something done by my sons case they have the names of presenter that that shot my son he know who did it as i brought up before mayor gavin newsom said i know who killed my son the police know who killed my son every year i grieve on his birth and anniversary his bitter passed april 6th and his anniversary on august 14th we've been 10 years since my sons murder i've just don't fight more my son other families and homicide victims out here they are cases are not solved through the years and as i said, "yes mayor gavin newsom said i know who killed your son i saw him at mothers

demand action i walked across that bridge i said, "yes i remember you i said what are you doing i didn't get an answer this is my son me and standing at any sons gravy bring those pictures i want to people to know how i feel what i deal wiwhat i deal >> thank you. >> thank you ms. brown. >> if you or anyone you know has information to the murder of aubrey abrakasa there is an unanimous tip line (415) 575-4444 thank you ms. brown.

>> good evening and welcome. >> sir. >> yes. as a military veteran of 6 nature years in a embattle had a lot of experience in lethal force and i've a couple of power points of clarification i guess to what wisdom luke you guys are currently drafting when you depict minimum force it is obviously to the individual and that allows a lot of gray when you explained that without a proper circulation of force you'll see continuous violation i was more restricted than in the community that should be considered and actually have exact levels into how they rack whether that is speaking first and also a consideration i don't know if you covered it a strong consideration of using not

having police respond to millennials individuals that is generally a bad idea not or should be happening we were getting therapists alongside the officers let's see what else and lethal force running away if i shot at someone in a war zone i'd go put in jail cops shouldn't be shooting there is other ways to pursue them thank you. >> thank you very much. >> next speaker. good evening and welcome. >> hi, i'm dearly rogers i don't know a change i'm also a resident of san francisco and 70 years old born and raised here and everything i've heard so far i'm still sitting here wondering if we change the use of force

policy and we even change the words if there are no consequences for officers in the field and if you're not putting consequences in that use of force policy. >> (clapping.) >> then you're not going to be able to stop any action that is happening in the field prior to. >> something going wrong because they don't center a reason to think twice about that so i think this is more important than you changing words is adrc something to this such as what kind of consequences you'll have if you fail to use minimum force. >> (clapping.) >> if you fail so use reasonable force. >> see if you don't put something behind and not telling him there will be a consequence

well at the moment i thought that was reasonable and as long as they can say that the policies no matter how well, they're written are still newly and avoid you must put some kind of meat behind every one of those statements and must be the officers must understand that simple because they don't want to do the act they must actor in order to keep themselves safe i mean, we're out here trying to stay is safe if we do you need to do that for them too. >> thank you, mr. rogers i'll ask chief chaplain to respond to the specific questions about the consequence. >> yes. go ahead. >> hi my name is linda i'm here on behalf of my son

okay. i feel like the problem with what's happening is the background investigators that's letting people come through here and flipping them through the curbs my son applied to the coach is the one that brought him in my son gets a note when other people gets cut under the curve under the curve i think started with the background investigators on the on behalf of they bring us in and i know i get paid for you and this and that and my son get a degree his name is on the papers jocelyn robert son i'm from bayview hunters point i don't see why we can't get a chance and every class that graduate you know, i take pictures on the tv i take

my sons pictures you better building i don't see that many african-americans going through it line your quick to getting give our kids and letter that wants a degree and though him under the bus because i know i, slip you under the curve you know why you're doing what you're doing who you bring in here flourish k k and people wanted to come - i can shoot your ass that's not fair my son is not in trouble football player did everything and they shoved him on the bused and shoot a nigger i got this badge it is not fair you need to start with those background investigators that pulling those people because that's the ones that killing them that's the ones that are shooting our

background for the - you get rid of the police officers. >> thank you, ma'am i'd like to ask someone from the command staff to follow up on that particular ma'am, if you're willing to talk with someone and provide details. >> i'd like more information so we'll follow-up. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is - welcome, welcome. >> my name is jim smith i enjoy the folks the san francisco-year-old that spoke earlier the citizens of san francisco fair-minded citizens can take the police commission seriously until the racism trigger happy cops that murdered people from the last two years

and before brought to justice in a clear and mooeveng way those kind of commissions are delaying the prosecution of trigger happy cops police should be disarmed and not allowed to carry pistols until they demonstrate common human values >> (clapping.) >> this kind of ranch behavior has got to be ended we can't take and all the police officers that are here you are guilty by association you have your officers union looking for excuses for killing innocent people mr. people without weapons and people that have been injured with beanbags and so forth homeless people helpless people shooting them in cold blood this this be

prosecuted we can't take you guys seriously until we see clear movement. >> is the district attorney's office makes the discussions on who files critical decisions that's not before us today. >> good evening members of the board i'm kevin an attorney at martin louis representing the transparent and accountability and law enforcement i'm primarily here to detail two additions the blue ribbon panel will comment one an open letter that details both the differences between the reverberations as well as some additional points absent in both vertigos that is finalize and rode in the coming day we have ready know there are summaries of the two versions we generated color coded red lines that laid out the differences

between version one and two you see the changes after my time is up i'll give copies to sergeant killshaw and for the commissioners just a purview of the items in our written commissions dismissing submissions in addition to the ones we expressed as to why we prefer version two the mandatory language is closer to the community standard and the reverberation two has a stronger principle of deesclation has a stronger commitment to promoter i did and we building that the immediate threaded defined in version two is better for the imminent threat than version one a few suggestions we expressed the meetings and repeated in the written submission are committed rvpthd a commitment to unbiased policing and the department of justice of broadening the

depiction of report recent use of force or resolving it into distance and one version right now for the affordable use of force is defined definitely we support a broader definition we suggestions specific to data collection not in either version as well as some additional substantive comments on version one and two this is finalized from the panel i'll jetting get the red line version to sergeant killshaw. >> thank you very much >> good evening and welcome. >> i'm adjusting myself rather than this group of people who totally - >> let's get real i am not those people are talking about the sanctity of life the district of life shoot people down 20 seconds after getting

out of the police car when they say it is unproductive to face the community after shot a pregnant woman. >> amen. >> when - when everyday they stop people on the streets who are just walking along people in the areas they wanted to be able to build extensive unaffordable housing for us it is perfectly obvious when you think about the role of the police so terrorize us and keep us down. >> (clapping.) >> and getting a stand we can provide my background is in health and so i see it particularly well and if you look at what's happening at the bayview theres a huge, huge police terror there

not only killing people but vaiktd them out of their houses and stopping them, the whole gang junction a has to do with with health care well the mission bay project is agree project of drug companies; right? the president to make billions of developing new drugs in order to do that very it to have housing for the people that work there they want to get working-class out of bayview in order to be able to bring those employees in so what do they do they murder them they hazard them in order to increase the profits. >> thank you, sir thank you, sir.

>> thank you, sir time for the next speaker thank you. >> (clapping.) >> thank you, sir thank you. >> next speaker . >> (clapping.) >> commissioner marshall look up you have a whole room of people because you called for it you give them two minutes look up when they technique to you let's talk about holding the police accountability and suzy loftus you accountable how are you accountable ♪ draft two people have been killed in justice of draft of this one this was called for after mario woods and since than a pregnant woman was killed how

are you go accountable respond no? okay >> how about you commissioner dejesus. >> i don't know. i want to hear what you have to say i have two minutes anything i say in two minutes not accountable didn't seem to me productive in the first place . >> (clapping.) >> two minutes is not enough time to talk about the definition that - we understand as a community you don't seem to grasp between health care and jurisdiction . >> (clapping.) >> and you think no. you know what we'll talk about on the future agenda question can't make those links and can't hold ourselves accountable for the bull shut in the first place. >> we don't have to wait in 2, 3, 4 bull shut line to say what we think you're on recess or

you're going home after thereby you're not held accountable in the first place you get to keep our job and you don't have to - no, that's not true tell me what you mean commissioner dejesus. >> make your two minutes. >> there we go see they don't want our opinions they want you to keep going thank you for not addressing those people in the first place. >> what do you guys want to see what did you guys want to see. >> next speaker >> next speaker, please. >> you're out of order, sir. >> next speaker. >> thank you you had you're too minutes >> next speaker. >> >> next speaker. >> >> next speaker. >> >> next speaker. >> >> (chanting.) >> you guys wait a long line of people we want to hear from

everybody welcome. >> this is our meeting this is for us we take control of that meeting we're not here to address you or your bull shut or your documents means nothing to anyone in the room not manning us safe look at go i'm mario woods i'm alex you're killing me and my brothers and sisters i'm tired of that living in fear i've been brutal listed by the cops but you you know what i get to go home additional see my family and hug my friends you're taking that away from people and brought to justice you lit them walk the streets wears paying their bills and parking ticket and the smug look like we don't care the community did not want this to take place you're letting it happen and you all

are wearing red and blue you have blood on your hands we all have blood on our hands you should be shamed and you know what doing our job you can't even solve murders that's one of your jobs you can't do that and protect us can't do anything for us nothing except for hurting us and killing the community until all of us is - >> okay. >> next speaker. >> thank you. >> i know my words don't mean shut to you people i'm an animal at the zoo for all you violated cops out there twice a year a tournament and judo tournament i'll kick our affecting ass all day long in a fair fight i'll

kick our ass if you had any idea i had a profession you think i'm and monkey or nigeria you can't look up at me didn't care about his own people if you are had any idea of after tloinl person a spirit warriors and how far i'm willing to go for my community you can why rome fell it didn't rely right hand the culture of people in the international strayed and share of their community with other nations to build their power they were rild on military mitigate not the night of their people the men were stupid overly fed and overly armed i promise you rome will fall every time