enrollment process, management effort to really keep track of dates and times and hopefully reduce the stress that occurs since we are getting ready for open enrollment. in terms of finance, you will hear from the finance committee. but again we'll emphasize that we have cut 1.5% this year and next year and the budget was approved by the mayor with no additional cuts. then we have to be vigilant about not having further cuts from the board of supervisors. our annual external audit kickoff occurred. in our 2015 post audit by the controllers offices yield no material weaknesses. beyond that, we are in good shape. the other thing i wanted to, in terms of wellness, let me highlight. >> can i just? >> yeah. >> i think we've seen in the

past sort of a comparison of medicare plan benefits for the different plans. so i'm wondering if enrollees get an opportunity to see a dashboard of some of these other things? because their pharmacy cost depend upon whether the drug is generic or not. their inpatient days varies per plan. some of them look fairly modest and different until you look at the number of days.. i'm wondering if that is somewhat of a goal, at some point when you are fully staff. i don't know if people ask about this. but it's the next logical attention for a consumer who want to know what they are buying. and what the potential risk maybe. how many inpatient days might there be while making the choice. >> and what are the most common diagnosis for those days. >> i'm not asking for it.

>> but if the board wants us to consider doing a forum on compare and contrast. >> that's something possibly we can take up as part of the educational effort, but also some of this information, i know it's posted as part of your director's report but there is also a notion of being more activity around this data and reports going forward. if that is the date to be true, it would say to me that we are going to have a link on the website so members can go into and review. >> this is a very good time to suggest that since we are looking at redoing the website. >> as more of these are being developed, you may want to plan on a link there. i know as part of your report, marina comes in and gives us a report, but they don't necessarily sit out alone and that can be a value as

pointed out. >> great suggestion. >> all right. i particularly appreciated the wellness thank you letter that was submitted by one of our members and it's also part of our report. >> about colorful choices? >> right. >> i want to highlight the wellness the eapa counseling services have reached the highest level in 2016 during the month of may. the addition of the counselor and having them do workshops on-site at different departments have really engaged employees and made them realize. again, the national literature shows that in all industries there is this depression in moral in every employer, i guess probably unless you work for google where they have free food and everything else.

commissioner breslin in particular has been concerned about nutrition and diabetes all along. i'm excited to report that the recruitment for the diabetes prevention program research study that we are doing with kaiser that kaiser is leaving is we have already enrolled 200 employees and we plan to roll that out formally in june and july. probably one of three employees develop diabetes. this is before you get diabetes. if we can teach them nutritional and behaviors would improve the diabetes situation. this directive came from this board of anticipation of trying to keep people healthy.

i just wanted to underscore on the part of what i did. review the budget materials, but i wanted to just say that our chief financial officer and her staff labor over the budget for hours and hours and they redo the numbers. everything is as tight as a sealed tuna can. our numbers, you can't question them and we are really lucky to have such good finance staff especially at this time of year. i can feel confident when i get a report that all i have to do is read into the microphone at the board of supervisors meeting. that concludes my report. >> would you highlight the rates? >> i apologize. yes. we revised the rates and benefits

calendar to add a rates and benefits meeting on tuesday, june 21st, from 12-2. it will allow five members to be in attendance as opposed to just four. it also is giving extra time for the actuary to look at what alternatives there are or what can be reexamined and renegotiated because of the retiree rates from blue shield and uacn and ppo and city plans came so high. they are still working on trying to figure out, is this formula the best and who is disrupted in the formula. all of those alternatives will be presented on june 21st. >> all right. >> so, at the april, when we

talked about the best doctors and at that time they said whoever presented said they would have the final rates for consideration at a meeting. when will that be? will that be at the next meeting? they said at the time this may not be the final rate. >> i understand it is the final rate. >> i'm not sure. i looked at my notes. >> you are asking about the best doctors rate? >> right. they said for the future we'll obtain the final rates for consideration. i didn't know if that was going to be part of -- >> can you speak into the microphone? >> yes, sorry. the final rates for best doctors. the $1.40 is the final rate. >> that is in the active rates that we approved. >> i saw that.

i didn't know it was ever approved. okay. >> any other questions? >> that includes the outreach, the extra amount for the outreach. >> any other questions about the directors report, is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we'll proceed to the next item >>clerk: item 6, discussion item. hss financial reporting as of april 30, 2016, and fy 2016-2017 and fy 2017-17 mayor's budget report for hss. >> on director levin, i would like to commend on the report and would ask you to thank them all for

the work they do day in and day out. >> thank you. good afternoon, chief financial officer. the financial report you have before you today summarize the revenues of the trust and general fund through april 30, 2016. we are projecting the trust will have a balance of $78.1 million on january 30, 2016. this is only $300,000 less than what i reported last month. has to the result of some ups and downs. the balance is from city plan due to unfavorable claims experience. blue shield $500,000 is due to unfavorable claim experiences. there were increases to the fund balance from delta dental to

$100,000 due to favorable claim experiences and then we received $300,000 for the forfeiture for the healthcare dollars. we also distributed a copy of the pages from the mayor's proposing budget. they look for those of you that have the black and white, they look a whole lot better in color. basically we proposed, they did extend a couple of limited duration positions and we ended up taking the cut, but had some return in for that.

as catherine mentioned or director dod mentioned that it was preliminary and they could work with us i hope that's true. we had a long discussion today about what we can and can't do and every effort is being made to ensure that we keep the department as a whole if we can. i know that's part of the director's concern and we are tight in our staffing levels and we can't afford to either have to keep two more positions vacant than we already have or make cuts to the rest of the staff. so that has been and will be clearly

communicated to the budget analyst. i have looked into -- the budget committee, supervisor farrell, supervisor katie tang and norman yee and then supervisor kim and supervisor wiener are the temporary members that join during this budget process. >> all right. thank you. so again i'm requesting the secretary to send the names to the board members e-mail and phone numbers so that we might engage in the process. is that all from you, director levine? great. moving right an along. is there any public comment?

>> claire savssky. >> i would like to commend pamela levine for her incredible work and also her staff's work. it's just amazing and we really do appreciate all the angst that goes through it and the hours and the efforts. it's just phenomenal. with regard to the battle now before the board of supervisors, it sounds like we did okay with the mayor's office, but now we are dealing with the board of supervisors cuts and looking to supervisor farrell to really take the lead on this and helping us out. we will send an e-mail blast to the members and ask them to send a letter to the committee. you have been part of what

we are doing at the retirement board with regards to our benefits. if they would like us to mobilize and show up at city hall, i'm sure we can put out the call and get that kind of turnout at city hall so they understand they can't mess with our delivery of health services as well as the retirees coalition. we are being quite activist in our old age and are here to support every effort that health services goes through and especially through back up pamela and also catherine in their efforts to really fight for our benefits. so whatever we can do, let us know and thank you very much. >> thank you. >> mr. chairman, on the next item. i realize i didn't update you on the legislation. >> all right. this is to go back to the director's report to include a discussion of the

legislative items, please. >> right, sb 932 was a bill that pretty much prevented anti-contracting within the health systems had been pulled from the agenda of the state legislative committee because there was a concern from san francisco general hospital and the san francisco health network that it might apply negatively to them. the legislation was amended shortly after that committee meeting and i met with ppa and the staff and they in fact withdrew their opposition, but unfortunately the bill did not get out of the second policy committee. so it's dead for the purposes of this legislative year. if there is a special session, it might be reintroduced, so we may do it again. the other bill sb 1010 from

the same author and it's still alive and well. they are trying to add transparency to pharmaceutical pricing. it requires to convoluted mechanism that pharma report to employers when there is going to be an increase of more than so% of pharmaceutical cost or a 1 prescription is going to cost more than $10,000 for the course of that prescription. and then the employees have to report to the department of insurance and the department of managed care that this is happening. it doesn't do anything, it just shines the light in pharmacy cost. >> the remedy as we all know is to have cmms in the marketing of negotiating their rights. but i'm not going to say

that again. go right ahead. >> on the state level this is a step again to say pharma and it's not okay in california . that went to the legislative committee yesterday and marina actually represented us there. i presume they approved it and the bill is still alive. it has a very small financial impact. it will probably pass through the state legislature and the budget committee and go on to the assembly. i will keep you informed. i apologize. >> thank you for those updates. >> i saw this in the packet and i did a bit of reading as well because this is an issue that concerns everyone in this room. the sb 1010 has wide support including the california medical association, etc. and to be distinguished from

a resolution in the november ballot to tie it into a complicated formula with the va medical center, that is different from this and we need to kind of watch that which is much more controversial with a lot of interest groups being very concerned about what would happen to drug availability. this is a small step, but a positive one. >> thank you. director levine? >> i'm sorry, i also forget something. >> we are now back to the finance report. we haven't quite left the finance. >> the first hearing for our budgeted is next thursday between 10:00-1 p.m.. that at that hearing we'll be asked to give a short presentation and then say whether or not we agree or don't agree to the budget analyst

recommendations and then if we continue to talk, that will go to, i have to think it's the i will have that date. but there is no opportunity to speak until there will be no opportunity to speak that next thursday. >> let me be clear. we are just presenting the budget? it will be made public? >> we will speak, but there is no opportunity for public comment. that 1 day. which is why we'll send you at the e-mail addresses. >> so the budget will be presented next thursday to the board finance committee. >> in seven slides or less.

>> that's between 10:00 and 1:00 p.m. and there will be a subsequent meeting in which public comment will be entertained? >> correct. >> thank you. >> the subsequent meeting is a day long meeting for all budget issues, not just for us. >> i understand. thank you. all right. next item. >>clerk: item 7, action item. based on the may 10 tsz governors committee's review of survey questions and discussion of the employee engagement survey, instruct director to pro with confidential employee engagement survey. summary of findings but not individual employee responses to be reviewed in open session. >> this i spoke about in my director's report. the responses will be kept

confidential but will be kept in aggregate summary form. >> this is requesting an action endorsement by the board. so i would like to entertain a motion that we concur with the process that's outlined. >> we are already doing. i thought it was approving this. we are already doing this. >> we were advised by council that we should have it on the record that the information will be kept confidential. all right. so i'm ready to entertain a motion that we accept the item as described. >> so moved. >> second. >> it's been properly moved and seconded that we accept the action item as described in item 7 regarding the employee engagement survey and it's confidentiality with a summary of responses to be provided in open session to this board at a subsequent

date. is there any question by members of the board? is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are ready to vote. the all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? passes unanimously. item 8. >>clerk: item 8. action item. consider signing on to the campaign for sustainable drug pricing. director dodd. >> i didn't get the handout in my campaign. did this get added? there is a resolution but also a campaign? >> i didn't see that. as i tried to click on the link to get a copy of the resolution, it didn't pop-up. it would send me back to the site map and i didn't

want to do that. so i just ask that we fix that if we can. >> thank you. claire slavssky, she corrected it. >> good. >> so, i was alerted to this by the pacific business group on how there is a national coalition to educate the public and physicians and others about the importance of drug pricing. i was again advised by our council that this board can't take positions on things organizations are doing that are lobbying. that that's the domain of the board of supervisors so we are essentially supporting their efforts and they are

being done through a 501c 3 the national organization on healthcare that doesn't lobby for the campaign against drug pricing. this is supported by the international coalition on healthcare to work fore drug pricing and ask the board of supervisors to pass assimilation and share it with the state c sac. >> the state association of counties. >> yes. the state association of counties to begin continue to build a momentum on drug pricing which is estimated by 2020 we'll make-up 50% of our medical spend. >> are there any comments or questions about the resolution from board members? >> you are signing onto a campaign? >> no, we are stating our support of the international healthcare coalitions educational

effort and we are urging the board of supervisors to sign on to the actual campaign for the sustainable drug pricing. >> we have to clarify that. it sounds as if we are signing onto the campaign an that is not what we are doing. we are encouraging the board of supervisors to engage in this. >> we changed the resolution, but we didn't change the agenda. >> right, it needs to be consistent. >> i apologize for that. >> all right. any other questions? >> yes, i have to plead some ignorance because i didn't go in and look at the campaign to see who is made up of and who is sponsoring and where they get their funding. do you have a summary? >> i can tell you many large employers and kaiser is

sponsoring. it cost $25,000 to be part of the campaign. so that pays for their lobbying efforts. it doesn't cost $25,000 to be part of the national coalition on healthcare which doesn't lobby. we are supporting the international coalition on healthcare that doesn't lobby. i imagine if the board of supervisors sign up, they will be part of the campaign. >> all right. any other questions? i'm ready to entertain a motion. >> so moved. >> second. >> the wording will be adjusted in the agenda. is there a second? >> second. >> it's been properly moved and second that we endorse the resolution as printed. any other questions from members of the board? is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. we are now ready to vote. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye.

>> any opposed? passes unanimously. all right. we are now down to action item no. 9. i will turn the chair over to the chair of the governance committee and past president of this board for that item. >> thank you. item 9. action item. election of health service board officers, president and vice-president for fiscal year 2016-2017. >> the nominees for president would be commissioner scott and vice-president would be commissioner lim. he's not here, but i'm assuming he would want this position. nobody has heard to the different, right? so these are the

nominations. anybody have any questions or anything? >> so do we? >> you don't have to second it. this is not a situation where we are asking for a nomination by the board. >> you need to vote on it. >> we have two candidates for one position? >> one is for president and vice-president. we are doing both of them together. >> okay. great. >> so i have to say >> thank you. i was suggesting that they are running as a slate together. [ laughter ] >> so, i think president scott has been doing quite a good job. with the exception of the

rate relavity stance he took. [ laughter ] i will give everybody one mistake. [ laughter ] >> be prepared if it comes back. >> i understand. so anyway, all those in favor of this slate for commissioner scott and commissioner slate for vice-president. is there any public comment on this? all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? >> it passes unanimously. thank you commissioner breslin for presiding over that portion of the meeting. as i indicated if i were reelected to this office that we would spend one of the fall meetings as an educational forum

meeting. so i'm putting us on record that we will probably do that whether it's the november meeting as we did last year. we'll work with director dodd and her staff to do that. it would be profoundly helpful if any of the commissioners have specific topics that they want to explore during this forum to please submit those either to my attention or to director dodd to again put together the agenda for that meeting. some of those will take preparations by our health plan partners or others to provide information or background if you will on some of these topics. as soon as we can clearly identify them. we can do it all, i will remind everybody, but it should be those things that are going to be near term or longer term issues that we may want to get background on

and better understanding in more detail of understanding. so we will plan to style one of our meetings this fall to do that. i also wanted to take this moment of personal privilege to thank the commissioners for working so diligently in the committee work during the course of the year in attending these meetings. i'm going to put a ban in month of june. i strongly encourage people to look at the other times of the year as we get near the rates and benefits process because we do need to have everybody here to hear the result of this work. so, hopefully that could be and we can attend to that. i know that vacations for both of these members were long planned before this time. lastly, i would like to thank a lot of the advising council that i have received from a variety of sources as i have

tried to preside at these meetings and prepare for them. i put at the top of the slate director dodd and also our actuary as well as my active council eric rap port. i have gotten counsel from my predecessor, some of which i have welcomed and some of which i have completely ignored. i plan to follow that same charter in the coming year. again, thanks for all the work that you have done and i have very much appreciated working with each and everyone of you. we'll now move to action item 10. yes. oh, i will certainly defer to her. will you please identify yourself? >> herbert weiner. retiree. i would just like to make a friendly suggestion to the board. one of the topics should be

"how to be your own advocate". like for instance sometimes certain medical test aren't provided for people and it can have a fatal result. i know a personal incidence of that. how to advocate, how to actually understand even though the diseases you may have, questions to ask the doctor. i think this should be interesting and i think this should be an on going aspect of the health fare. so people can real use this assistance to their advantage to get maximum medical care and especially important if you are retired. >> thank you very much for that suggestion. >> no others. we'll move to action item 10. >> >>clerk: action item 10.

vote on whether to cancel july 2016 health services board meeting. >> we have in the past canceled this meeting because board of supervisors is on vacation. we will be meeting. the board of supervisors isn't on vacation. they are doing the budget. >> i move we cancel the july meeting. >> is there a second . >> second. >> universally second. is there any additional public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? unanimous. >> okay. discussion item 11. >>clerk: report on network and health plan issues if any. presenter: good afternoon, cindy, from kaiser permanente. i wanted to give you a two

1/2 years notice for us to give you the amount of time for this concept. this was announced a year ago. i will give you more information. kaiser permanente will be opening it's own medical school in 2019. it will be located in pasadena. it will start with roughly 50 physician candidates. and essentially it's really expanding our current foot print to the first year of the medical school. we already really do a significant amount of years two, three and four. we are adding the first year. any questions? >> well, the only comment i would add. we know the primary care physician pool in this country is drastically low and the demand is increasing given the expansion of the accountable care act. you are commended to taking that forward in a

step in that area. >> i appreciate that. i will pass that along. >> in terms of value of medical care, but the medical school is being perceived in a format that will encourage primary care development or because, you know, because of the obvious concern, no offense to any specialty, [ laughter ] those specialist that clock in at 9:00 and leave at 5:00. >> i know of none of those. the mission of it is to provide a different focus and approach to those physicians in their early stages of education, and to inspire a different way of thinking about how to deliver care in an integrated model holistic approach that we hope will inspire

more primary care physicians. its mission is not to just funnel physicians for our own. it's all about spreading this perspective throughout the country, and the deficit in primary care physicians is at the top of mind for this. did that answer your question? >> yes. i just want to remind kaiser that there are many many physicians and nurse practitioners and nurses throughout kaiser currently throughout the areas who do teach, and it might be that an important impact would be to enhance the activities of their own teaching and give them some credit for their teaching so that it is not just add to their burden of work, but

actually because you know, i had medical students throughout my career at kaiser permanente and frankly it just added to my. there is no acknowledgment from the organization in terms of work load or anything. >> great. thank you. >> thank you very much for informing us and please plan on updating us on the progress on this activity. are there any other health plan or network issues? public comment? public speaker: i have a public comment. i really commend kaiser permanente for doing this. i have one request, that is that kaiser permanente open another school and they do it in the rural areas because those areas are really under served in the state. if you live in the central valley, i think you are at the mercy

of physicians here in the city. it's a question of getting to them. the transportation aspect. sometimes the medical care in the rural areas isn't exactly the best. so, i think there is a real demand for primary care in the rural areas. and i would like to commend kaiser permanente of the attempt to switch medical plans but i won't go that far. >> thank you very much. >> may i just comment really quick? >> yes. >> it's interesting to know that kaiser has had a medical office present in stockton for some time and in fresno. so when you think about the valley, but that they are and correct me if i am wrong, they going to co- oenown dignity. they are working with dignity to straighten out

the hospital which otherwise would close. of all the hospital chains, kaiser is i think taking your advice to heart. in terms of being proper in rural areas, the california office of managed care, governance how long people have to drive in order to call yourself a managed care organization. we talked about this yesterday at the customer advisory group of kaiser. and because of telemedicine and because of so many things, those regulations really need to be looked at. it might be something that we ask our state elected officials to ease up on to provide access to integrative healthcare because it is hit and miss when you are in a rural area. very good point. >> thank you. any other public comment? public speaker: thank you, claire von'sky. when they look at driving,

they look at how many members they might have in an area to determine that. but, i strongly support that because of our twaul me mess because i'm concerned about stockton because they don't reach fresno. but stockton and if kaiser has presence in those areas, it helps members who are in tul me that -- help with that. we have been working with the retirees. i have been getting a number of complaints from our members with regard to medicare services for our retirees who are blue shield members. i have been working with mitchell and with staff on these issues. they are unresolved at the time but in lieu of the june 21st

meeting coming up and seeing the rates that are coming down from blue shield, we really need to be concerned about what's going on in their rating of i think they are over rating. they continue i believe to over rate through their underwriters. they over rate their premiums and the risk coming down from cms and i think we really need to work hard on those rates and also the service delivery because i think they have miss coded some members and i don't know if they are wrong in premiums but they are being wronged with balance bill and harassed by the blue shield system that are refusing to affect the fact that our members are in fact hmo members and shouldn't be harassed over these bills and really deserve a better level of service from blue shield. they have an obligation to provide medicare services. we have a history on that where they have tried to get out of that and keep the cob

plan for years. they are required to provide the medicare advantage. if we establish more competition because there is a different playing field, i think blue shield will be forced to take a look at different rates. this is a very important issue particularly for medicare retirees. i would like to thank the hss staff who work on behalf of retirees who are really struggling with this issue. thank you. >> thank you for your comment. >> commissioner? >> is anyone here from united healthcare? >> no. >> i had a person who had a problem with the plan. >> all right. are there any other comments

from network representatives? if not we go to discussion item 12. >> item 12, discussion item. opportunities to place items on future agendas? >> i'm concerned about nutrition counseling because it came up at the last meeting that blue shield doesn't have nutrition counseling unless you are diabetic. that is not correct. you can actually get nutrition counseling for other things than being diabetic. i thought that was good news. the only thing you have to cover now are the ones that are not involved, i think it's important we demand nutrition counseling be included in these benefits. we are paying a lot of money out for wellness and they don't even have nutrition

counseling. so united healthcare doesn't have any at all from what i can see. i checked on 3 places with them and they don't cover it unless you are diabetic. the idea is to stop this before it starts. so, i mean there are so many list of things that could be helped with diet, and so many people are unaware of what to eat today. what the right thing to eat is a real thing. i think this should be added onto our next month's agenda or is there someway that this needs to be included in our benefits for next year. >> i think it should be included in our planned design change and next year. >> it shouldn't really cost more when you consider the cost of obesity and consider the cost of cancer. >> blood pressure and so forth. >> on and on. so it shouldn't be an extra cost. >> all right. thank you. we will add that

to our listing going forward for our benefits discussion next year. next month, we don't have a meeting next month. >> so they go all year without nutrition counseling again? >> we can make clear in our open enrollment materials which of the vendors have nutrition counseling and then next year, this board can say, add to the plan design. when you open the book or open the web page and it list all the different services, we can expressly say we want nutrition counseling. >> it's so important that it should be there now. you might be able to suggest they put it in our benefits at no extra cost. >> if you were prediabetic, it would be nice to go all the way diabetic.

>> well, i will ask the director to take their advisement what we can do in this year's benefit cycle with our vendors and certainly do whatever we can in terms of publicizing the result of that. all right? okay, is there any other public comment on item 12? seeing none, we'll move to item 13. >> item 13. discussion item. opportunity for the public to comment on any matters within the board's jurisdiction. >> is there any public comment, seeing no public comment, this meeting stands adjourned until august. [ meeting is adjourned ]

as a society we've basically failed big portion of our population if you think about the basics of food, shelter safety a lot of people don't have any of those i'm mr. cookie can't speak for all the things but i know say, i have ideas how we can address the food issue. >> open the door and walk through that don't just stand looking out. >> as they grew up in in a how would that had access to good food and our parent cooked this

is how you feed yours this is not happening in our country this is a huge pleasure i'm david one of the co-founder so about four year ago we worked with the serviced and got to know the kid one of the things we figured out was that they didn't know how to cook. >> i heard about the cooking school through the larkin academy a. >> their noting no way to feed themselves so they're eating a lot of fast food and i usually eat whatever safeway is near my home a lot of hot food i was excited that i was eating lunch enough instead of what and eat. >> as i was inviting them over teaching them basic ways to fix

good food they were so existed. >> particle learning the skills and the food they were really go it it turned into the is charity foundation i ran into my friend we were talking about this this do you want to run this charity foundations and she said, yes. >> i'm a co-found and executive director for the cooking project our best classes participation for 10 students are monday they're really fun their chief driven classes we have a different guest around the city they're our stand alone cola's we had a series or series still city of attorney's office style of classes our final are night

life diners. >> santa barbara shall comes in and helps us show us things and this is one the owners they help us to socialize and i've been here about a year. >> we want to be sure to serve as many as we can. >> the san francisco cooking school is an amazing amazing partner. >> it is doing that in that space really elevates the space for the kids special for the chief that make it easy for them to come and it really makes the experience pretty special. >> i'm sutro sue set i'm a chief 2, 3, 4 san francisco. >> that's what those classes afford me the opportunity it breakdown the barriers and is this is not scary this is our choice about you many times this

is a feel good what it is that you give them is an opportunity you have to make it seem like it's there for them for the taking show them it is their and they can do that. >> hi, i'm antonio the chief in san francisco. >> the majority of kids at that age in order to get them into food they need to see something simple and the evidence will show and easy to produce i want to make sure that people can do it with a bowl and spoon and burner and one pan. >> i like is the receipts that are simple and not feel like it's a burden to make foods the cohesives show something eased. >> i go for vera toilet so

someone can't do it or its way out of their range we only use 6 ingredients i can afford 6 ingredient what good is showing you them something they can't use but the sovereignties what are you going to do more me you're not successful. >> we made a vegetable stir-fry indicators he'd ginger and onion that is really affordable how to balance it was easy to make the food we present i loved it if i having had access to a kitchen i'd cook more. >> some of us have never had a kitchen not taught how to cookie wasn't taught how to cook.

>> i have a great appreciation for programs that teach kids food and cooking it is one of the healthiest positive things you can communicate to people that are very young. >> the more programs like the cooking project in general that can have a positive impact how our kids eat is really, really important i believe that everybody should venting to utilize the kitchen and meet other kids their age to identify they're not alone and their ways in which to pick yours up and move forward that. >> it is really important to me the opportunity exists and so i do everything in my power to keep it that.

>> we'll have our new headquarters in the heart of the tenderloin at taylor and kushlg at the end of this summer 2014 we're really excited. >> a lot of the of the conditions in san francisco they have in the rest of the country so our goal to 257bd or expand out of the san francisco in los angeles and then after that who know. >> we'd never want to tell people want to do or eat only provide the skills and the tools in case that's something people are 2rrd in doing. >> you can't buy a box of psyche you have to put them in the right vein and direction with the right kids with a right place address time those kids don't have this you have to instill they can do it they're good enough now to finding out figure out and find the future

for at 62942 working with together we can support your children. it's been my dream to start is a valley school since i was a little girl. i'm having a lot of fun with it (clapping) the biggest thing we really want the kids to have fun. a lot of times parents say that valley schools have a lot of problems but we want them to follow directions but we want them to have a wonderful time and be an affordable time so the

kids will go to school here. we hold the classes to no longer 12 and there's 23 teachers. i go around and i watch each class and there's certain children i watched from babies and it's exciting to see them after today. the children learn how to follow directions and it ends up helping them in their regular schooling. they get self-confidents and today, we had a residual and a lot of time go on stage and i hope they get the bug and want

to dance for the rest of their .

>> (clapping.) >> in 2013 san francisco legislators newsom agreed to allow the reciprocate of our soft story buildings those building house one and 20 thousand resident a program of that collect requires extensive outreach and this continuation of that process who is here and bill graham the perfect venue so in 2014 we have the first earthquake retrofit a huge success we're repeating this model what we've done it put together venues that are time professionals and contractor are financing institutions a other services

that help people comply with the retrofit and as you can see the thousands of members of the public their assessing over one hundred vendors to comply with the ordinance or make improvements on their property i came to get specification information and puck h picking up information if you don't know what twaur doing i take it overwhelming. >> we're pleased a critical mass of people are keying into knowing their relents and understanding what had are the next steps to take and they're figuring out who to talk to not only the contractor by the mustards and the architect and the structural engineers and getting the full picture of what options are necessary and being pro-acti

pro-active. >> so i'm very pleased to see the soft story buildings 99.9 percent complies the highest of the program of this scale of the history a citywide effort high blood pressure in every stretch of san francisco to understand real risks associated with earthquake and those are universally agreed on. >> at some point you need to gather information i'll be talking to another engineer to come out and take a look at it and basically get a second opinion i'm for second and third opinions it is inspiring to see all the property owners that want to do the right thing and for proactively figuring out what the solutions to get them that. >> what is amazing to me here we are over two years of first retrofit fair and at the time we are rh2 out to contractors to

help us and reaching it out to design professionals that soft story buildings is in any and people understanding how to comply now it is different an industry that springs up as a result of the - their professed and gotten the costs down with lower financing options and these are defined and now the gene progression and have the buildings are buildings and the compliance we understand the 2020 one and 20 thousand san francisco's 15 messenger of our population will live in a retrofit building those people buildings or lives in buildings with 5 or more residential building is soft story and wood frame and built before 1978 that house that one and 20 thousand san franciscans. >> san francisco is being the leader in getting in done and as

you may know los angeles passed their retrofit law two months ago at the sort of taken san francisco's lead on the one and tenth anniversary as the residents san francisco this is a road map to the city and going to give us us plan are these to keep folks here on a disaster and steps to build a resident waterfront by 2020. >> this involves more than one and 80 individuals and over 60 nonprofits and other companies this is a huge plan and what are the challenges we realize that people are concerned about climatic change, sea level rise and not only the affiliated hazards but things hike you're our amp infrastructure and consumed by social and other

things we see this in society everyday and how we try to mitigate those are ultimately a direct result how resident we are after earthquake other issue out of the strategy of the concept after a major earthquake of keeping 95 percent of population here in san francisco that's the single best thing to help a equitable recovery to keep people here keep people back to work and kids in school and a residents of normal after a disaster. >> alliance energy in our partner undertook comprehensive bid process we interviewed a half-dozen of folks who wanted to have a part of our soft story buildings are ordinance so alliance energy project programming is a clean assess

energy a special financing that is done using the taxed authority of local multiples and one of the interesting features the loan is tied to the property not the vital if an individual didn't have good credit but it is another option for people not able to comply to find another avenue the assessment is actually places on the property and the builds for in that come literally a line item on the tax bill that's how you pay off the segment and tax. >> 20 or thirty years is all paid up front there are advantages your property tax well it is important to give people on option and many private banks that provide loans over a are shorter term we wanted to create a longer pay

back term. >> i think the next step for property owners after at the create themselves to take the plunge and quit the working downey done and have works of work done right of the right rest of the property owners can understand this process across the city. >> we need to do it. >> it is safety you know that's the bottom line safety. >> earthquake safety a everybody's responsibility that is providing the resources that people need to get done if you want to know more of the resources as a san franciscan please visit the much.

>> (clapping.) >> all right. good afternoon, everyone i'm kate brown serve as governor of oregon and glad to see you the pacific northwest has a difference community and shared infrastructure and a regional economy with a combined gp d of 8 trillion usd the economy ranks for the entire world the impacts and challenges of climatic change fixes us all regardless of jurisdictional boundary fighting climatic change is an economic sensitive though the pacific coast we've demonstrating that the regional collaboration does make a difference more than each of us extinguisher on our own we took action on national and international by establishing the pacific coast making an

investment for resilient infrastructure and notify technologies and continue to push for national and international climate changes for the pacific northwest agreement through that collaboration and instant with the paris agreements we have a significant opportunities to reduce green house gas emissions it is so important for us to careen as partners against global climatic change and take stock of the progress and set in the candidates we create a cleaner more resilient energy feature as governor of oregon i'm condominium to have this goal and building environmental values and economic development have not exclusive goals our green house gas emissions were set within an ice for oregon to do it's part to reduce the green house gas emissions and we're

actively pursuing policies and strategies to make those goals a reality oregon industry is sdruch the trajectory of green house gas emissions while supporting a thriving economy and earlier this spring i had the coal to clean for a future free of coal powder electrical by doubling the renewal energy serving organs to 50 percent by 20202025 our population is growing quickly and the demands for energy we'll strive to be a partner on climatic change and we'll continue to working hard on this greatest challenge to our way of life and continues prosperity for the jurisdictions in our country and across the entire globe thank you. >> govern jan all thank you it

is said if you want to go fast good alone and if you want to go far go together we'll do this together we have a long link journey but started big time on times pacific coast for a couple of years we're governs that looked into the eyes of people go had they're a homes burn and when you see the shock of people suffering you know action is required we're providing and second we understand on the pacific coast is that economic growth and action on climatic change that are both happening in the west xooft not a coincidence but a cause one of the reasons we have a robust economy on the pacific coast we embraced the technologies of clean energy we have a fossil fuel free in washington state ways we increased the solar 100 percent last year reduced the

the cost of solar and it is because of that initiative economic strategy we have a robust economy at the same time reducing the treat eve climate change i'm glad to be here the ecology ruled out a rule this is a wall of protection against cash pollution for the first time a rule will be implement in our state that creates a cash pollution coming from major e minorities and joined other states to streamlining those with all the things including the renewable portfolio and centers for solar and energy finishes in the building and the like this is a great day for my state to join other governs robust step forward and the last thing i want to mention this collaborative has been

successful already one of the reasons my state has been consecutive ♪ rule we have the assistance of other states that assisted us in looking at their experience so we can create a rule that is both flexible for industries and know it works this has already worked one of the things i'm happy we have a resounding in custody emphasis over is overview twin of climatic change change ocean certification a specific treat to the maritime industries we have an industry had to move the operations by the way, of cab and i believe that with the opportunity to move on ocean certification to get away from the climatic change you're about 15 years two lastly zero doer debate about ocean cervix this cashier needs to be not going into the ocean

doing damage to the waters i hole pristine i'm excited and they've to british columbia taking care of our state >> thank you govern as a representative i'm really happy to see the progress as a region it has been a great year for climatic for britain columbia not only this renewed relationship but seeing the federal government that is not taking a keen interest for a jurisdiction from canada that began this work in 2008, we're excited to have there federal papering it means right now our predicament minister is leading a protest that works towards a can canada was launched with the vancouver dilation and a lot of things we're doing in british columbia will be rfblt of what

you see at a canadian approach but it goes hand in hand with what you see in front of the you it is extremely difficult to go it alone when our a natural jurisdiction like british columbia with 4 million people it is not hard to get leakage it is one of the reasons to be working together we have right now a cash tax that is one of the highest and broadcasted in the world did bank timing called that one, the most powerful example of pricing we also are the first and still the only jurisdiction in north america to, cashier neutral for the last 5 years our energy supply is 98 percent clean and the g h g emissions are amongst the lowest in canada it is not a lot of

easy places to look for continued emissions reduction it makes those partnerships all the more important and i want to reinforced to you what's been express this and have to be a choices between the assignment and the economy in fact, we look at the potential results the climatic change we can clearly say our economic future as world that indeed as a region is depend on action to reduce the implications of climatic change i'll give you some example from our economy in british columbia we internal revenue by the way, the faster growing economy in canada we're the only province in canada to balance the budget we're the only province with a triple a's credit rating with a great economy wife seen 68 thousand

jobs a 12 percent increase since years and the g dp rose in the realm to $6 billion plus in 2014 and that's a 18 want 3 increase from 2010 our economies don't think our actions to combat climatic change we welcomes partnerships not only because of success bus the opportunities it give us we know that for the future of our planet and the much of our children and grandchildren we can't be the generation this drops the ball we have to pick up the baton and need everyone's ideas together is the only way to successfully tackle this. >> govern. >> thank you. this is indeed another milestone in 2013, the pacific coast

collaborative started it was relatively small and very embryonic in its sense here we are joined by key cities in the bay area and making that commitment to reduce carbon dioxide and other green house gas emissions this is a serious threat it is a major issue and on the west coast we remember taking action serious action now around the country there are states and political leaders that have their head in the sand and someone running for president that calls us and this meeting should be stopped immediately because everyone would be crazy but that's not say way it is and the other thing he should be stopped and should be stopped

soon i've indicated yesterday (laughter) anyway, i am encouraged i try tee set the difficulty of dealing with climatic change when you read this commitment we're making there's a lot of provisions and a lot of words this is not just one thing stop this no? integrated it is comprehensive and requires governs and congress people and entrepreneurs and utility executives and mobilizing all the swath of civilization and your leadership on the west coast ultimately the united states and the rest of the world we're here in a initiative part of word most of the leaders come here and want to get part of that innovation and tremendous

economic identify wisdom and we're to make a commitment for climatic change that is more and more visual in the national dialogue not enough for my sense but this what we're doing here advances the ball and how far we've come to 2013 indicates the seriousness of what we're doing and when we do this again in another year or two we're making advance and not just elected people that is this morning bill gates asia tom a serious financial players and they're here joining with anyone stares of energy from the different parts of world now with paris because of president obama and wanting she we really made a real step up ♪ effort which was not true just a

couple years ago so this is important it is only another step but an important step and more and more people are following we are all collaborating organizing low cashier full standards washington is look at it as a overall cap on emissions and, of course, the cashier pricing in british columbia is recognized by the world back that's the way to go there's a lot of progress and a long way to go but each step is very important essential toe getting the ultimate goal the decashed world. >> thank you govern and i'm honored and exciting to be in the company of really great leaders that are coming together to be here to bear witness on this historic collaboration on our climatic change i'm proud to add that the city of san francisco to this

agreement along with so many other west coast mayors and our city's on the front line of climatic change and becoming more clear that we can't fully address this alone we need leadership and we are seeing that happen before our eyes and desires me to be part of this work of the pacific coast collaborative the reality the impact of climatic change knows no state or city or national boundary line satisfies and daughters and wildfires are going to continue to wreak havoc across the region threatening you are victimized and property our social and economic resources and public health i look at this as a regional

insurance together we've prove that decisive and national climate action we can mitigated those through goal setting and strengthening the regional economies assessment we're reducing green house gas emissions and mr. was right in san francisco we've been able to reduce the green house gas emissions to 23 percent below 1990 levels and while at the same time our population has increased by 15 percent and our economy at the same time as grown by 49 percent we can grow sustainablely for our planets this agreement will take our local efforts to a new high i look forward to work with the governors and heads of state how we might scale up the inches

for great are impact i want to thank all the gofrjz and ministers for me the next step to a lot about for our neighbors to the south and look at the states of baja, california and perplexing city we can truly have been entire west coast collaborative we have a lot of work i'm excited excited to join great partners like across the bay area. >> thank you i feel this guess a resounding union four of us up here were on the stage in paris in december speaking about climatic change on the pacific coast great to continue the partnership and the work to really recognition that climatic change didn't see governmental boundaries more can we if we prevent catastrophic

damage we see coming our way in oakland, california we're proud to be included in the climate champions we firmly believe that cities are a great part of that conversation and solution particularly like oakland and san francisco we know that globally the vast majority of core manages are coming from the world cities that is going to increase as populations are golden state and yet the creativity to try new things in oakland one of the things we've hope to share is our zero waste program something we believe the main contributed to our significant reduction our 9 percent in core emissions and 14 percent in consumption emissions another thing we hope to

contribute to the conversation is creating a measurement of consumption go emissions to again thinking collaboratively and not only about the emissions that are coming if our city but the emissions that are caused by the con summing inside of our city even though this product was produced somewhere else and our partnership with uc berkley is setting a standard in calculating that critical consumption emission standard and, of course, we have so much to learn from all of you, we represent the main ports of entry for goods coming from asia into the united states how we manage goods movement in a quasi that didn't exacerbate climatic change is a really important conversation we hope to learn from all of you in your practices and so with that, oakland is incredibly proud to join that that initiative group of leaders

united and commitment to collaboration to stop climatic change and talk about dangerous i know i get to make my donald trump joke there is nothing more dangers or dangerous than george climatic light for our city an

streets illuminating our ideas and values starting in 2016 the san francisco public utilities commission is xhoefl that light with new led with the did i audits for better light for streets and pedestrian and they're even better for this vitally lasting longer and consuming up to 50 percent less energy upgrading takes thirty minutes

remove the old street light and repeat 18 thousand 5 hundred times while our street lights will be improving the clean energy will remain the same every san francisco street light is powder by 100 percent godfathers hetch hetchy power in one simple word serious as day turns

>> good afternoon, everyone we're going to get started the meeting will come to order. this is the crisis intervention this is the regular meeting of the land use and transportation i'm supervisor cowen chair of this committee to my right is supervisor wiener and my left is supervisor peskin our clerk is the crisis intervention lovely andrea ashbury and i like to recognize

lee and phil jackson from sophisticating helping us by broadcasting this meanwhile madam clerk, any announcements? >> yes. completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. items acted upon today will appear on the april 16th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> item one a resolution authorizing the municipal transportation agency to that compete the application more affordable housing for sustainable communities program at eddy street and item 2 a resolution 30 years the crisis intervention municipal transportation agency to compete a grant for affordable housing as a sustainable community project ever project on bell. >> colleagues the sponsor of this item they've informed me additional requirements needed in order to finalize these recessess and applications and they have requested a

continuance to the crisis intervention june 27th land use and transportation and before we take public comment there's staff and the crisis intervention mayor's office of housing that is here is their anything to add no seeing none, no other comments let's go ahead and take open up for public comment on this two members of the public on items one and two you'll have two minutes here at the platinum please come up seeing none, public comment is closed. thank you very much colleagues can i have a motion to continue this to the june 27th seconded by r motion by supervisor peskin and without objection that motion carries anonymously thank you madam clerk item 3 >> an ordinance amending the transportation code for the crisis intervention evasion and passenger conduct regulations.

>> great go colleagues my office received a request from the sponsor of this item supervisor mar that we continue this to the next meeting on june 20th public comment on item 3 coming up all right. public comment is closed. at this time thank you colleagues, can i have a motion to continue to june 20th >> thank you motion by supervisor wiener without objection that item passes unanimously thank you could you please madam clerk items 4 and 5. >> yes. item 4 amending the planning code to create affordable housing bonus program and item 5 the gunmen plan for the crisis intervention legislation creating the affordable housing bonus program. >> supervisor tang will be joining us shortly and perhaps

start with the planning commission until supervisor tang gets her our good afternoon director rahaim i'll kickoff this item briefly and introduce my colleagues who will give most of presentation no secret that affordable housing is probable the crisis intervention issue of our time and this is an issue that is being a crisis not only in san francisco but in any cities across the country especially cities that be walkable and attractive to a large percentage of the crisis intervention population we were charged when we developed grasping with the crisis intervention development of a local program to implement that the crisis intervention law requires us to do in lui of the developers have the crisis intervention option or using the state law as written we worked with the affordable housing developers and the crisis intervention mayor's office of housing to make the entitlement

of 100 percent easier to make the city dollars easily and obviously securing land is an obstacle the crisis intervention costs are related to housing construction when we scurvy lands this program allows the housing to be arbitrate easier we are work hard in support of affordable housing programs and we are looking forward to continuing working on that with mohcd and the board the department is honored to lead this work we're whether that go forward just the affordable housing program or the crisis intervention mixed use we believe in the importance of this program that will lead to the development of significantly larger number of affordable units i want to thank the staff when worked on this occurring ton that led the

effort and monique and paul and other structure departments sophie hayward and mayor's office of housing obviously commissioner chung and her staff and michael and corey teague and others an important effort we're grateful for your moving ahead and happy to present and answer questions he know that supervisor tang wants to make a few comments but my staff will make the bulk of the presentation thank you. >> i'd like to welcome supervisor tang who is the crisis intervention author of this legislation to lucrative commissioner chung the floor is yours. >> thank you for the staff for working tirelessly on this program i'm not going to into the history of the development of the protective except to say that really we had worked for about two years planning department staff about two years

with technical consultants to figure out what is the crisis intervention best way for encouragement of affordable housing in san francisco and insuring we're not so fluid with the restrictions under the affordable housing bonus plan law there have been concerns about the crisis intervention lack of community outreach on this this program i have never seen the crisis intervention planning department staff work to go out to every single supervisorial district some more than once to discuss the program through those outreach meeting we've fine tuned and continued to fine-tune what we want to see in the affordable housing bonus program and so with that said i think we are heard. of you loud and clear but in terms of my goals for the most

part i'll like to see better tools to support middle-income families in san francisco we certainly do not 0 did he clarify given some of the comments from various community members just to make sure there is an understanding we have a mixed use program a market-rate supported by the market-rate housing develops and 100 percent program which i understand that supervisor cowen has his version of that he introduced last week as well given the crisis intervention realms of community outreach meetings we've held there are a couple of amendments i'll be making today and i want to clarify that many of those amendments are actually to the mixed income program i have a couple of copies just a high-level summary of those amendments i'll share those with the committee members again, this is for the mixed

income program i will be amending to prohibit the crisis intervention demolition of residential unit with the rent-controlled unit this is something that supervisor president london breed had announced several months ago i'm simply putting that into the actual legislation today need more secondly, we actually going to be requiring a conditional use authorization process the crisis intervention mixed income program we have heard loud and clear that our community members want to voice when it comes to the approval process wools require a cu for the crisis intervention mixed income program third-world wiring direct the city to closer a small go relocation fee and the crisis intervention first right of refusal and certainly not want not to support them

other things for example, we would like to close the idea of maintaining the same square footage not discouraging retail use from that coming in we need more time to sort out legally we'll directing the city to closer those things here and fourth we're requiring that the early notifications for commercial tenants we had in the legislation be no longer 18 months to the tenants and the office of economic workforce development how to better support them with a project that effects they're building and next including in the finding a reference to the tools and support for the small business tenants as i said i think that really the budget of work focused on though to preserve

the crisis intervention small businesses and trying to executive more affordable housing in our neighborhood and then to be 100ercent affordable program a couple of amendments i'd like to make today because that many of the concepts that were in supervisor peskin legislation are actually in ours but two major things we want to point out one is that we do want to again prohibit find demolition of residential units that's a concept for both programs and highlight the projects under the 100 percent program are all right. prohibited on parcels that are rh1 and rh2 those are the changes i'd like to make and at this time then i will throw it back the planning department staff they'll be able to explain the crisis intervention rational

today thank you good afternoon, supervisors again gil kelly >> i'm sorry sdmooenz was on the crisis intervention roster i want to make sure he is heard intent. >> thank you, madam chair and i'll be brief and we'll hold a bunch of my comments for later in the meeting i want to acknowledge the work of supervisor tang her staff as well as the planning department staff and the mayor's office of economic workforce development as well as the crisis intervention many hundreds of individuals who have been involved in workshops and contacted all the crisis intervention offices quite frankly very controversial they important piece of legislation i hope we get right as a preliminary comment there are two items before us one supervisor tang's piece of legislation the crisis intervention second is a general plan all the time i have together with supervisor mar

introduced a separate piece of legislation that is not technically in front of that committee yet although later on in this hearing he will duplicate commissioner sanchez legislation and use that has a vehicle to amend in supervisor mar and my density done right proposal step back and is an, an overarching matter the general plan before this body i think has been done in a way that is too broad and needs to be more narrowly trader i believe that planning has the crisis intervention ability to tailor it more than that set of asterisks that to my mind is not the way of going about it i'd like later on in the meeting after public comment suggest that we forward the general plan

amendment to the for action and let me say at the outset that because of the way that the crisis intervention law works general plan amendments go into effect 90 days after this body receives if it from the action by the commission self-we don't actor in that 90 days it as a matter of law is approved we need to take action prior to july 6th but that action where in i believe we need to turn down the plan as written and not construed as a desire not to move forward with a h s d legislation more, more narrowly crafted i'll be suggesting in the meeting we forward the general plan amendment to the full board with a recommendation not to pass it as this body deliberates supervisor tang's legislation with the amendments that she's proposed i appreciate

as well as the crisis intervention duplicated file that will be reflective supervisor mar and my density done right legislation we introduced last week. >> thank you very much all right. gil we're ready for you. >> again good afternoon, supervisors gil kelly director of citywide planning in the planning department i have a presentation that is high-level and brief so the crisis intervention best use of your time we respond to a particular question subsequent to the presentation so - >> just so you know sort of what is in this presentation and what is the item before you that is summarized i want to begin by stepping back briefly to frame what this is all about and then to talk about the crisis intervention two components of the program and then the crisis intervention suggestion that we

- both made by the crisis intervention planning commission and supporting supervisor that we continue to refine some parts of the mishgd program in particular and then describe the crisis intervention proposed action for you today again so that will zero in primarily on the crisis intervention 100 percent affordable piece just wanted to step back and say that there are some key facts that we all need to be aware that self-is easy to get into the details of this debate overprogram details and to assert that right now about 43 percent of san francisco households pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing this is astonishing finger 22 percent pay more than 50 percent of their housing and that's an

enormous number and what is concurring as san francisco grows and adds population an enormous churn of the population underneath that whereas we've added 10 thousand people over the years in san francisco and at least a couple of the recent years 70 thousand people have moved in 60 thousand have left of the people left the crisis intervention income bias there's a higher income of individuals moving into san francisco and protecting income moving out so those are to he's e key realties that have some is directives behind them and the second piece on the crisis intervention page is really to sort of crisis lists those big moving pieces the crisis intervention debate is much bigger than we're having today first of all, we are seeing a reserveal in many

decades of move of families to inner that is reserveing that pressure of people moving to the core which are driving prices and rents up and displacement comes with that for the crisis intervention locking people living in the core of the city and also it is true whereas the crisis intervention high technology sector is driving in the bay area as a whole those workers tend to have higher incomes and more choice in the market where to locate than the crisis intervention existing residents additional pressure size from the crisis intervention pure growth and also true that the crisis intervention bay area has a hole

in san francisco and san francisco has been under producing new housing relative to the increase in the number of jobs and it is important to noted that is a bay area wide phenomenon we've added 6 hundred thousand jobs since the crisis intervention post recession since 2010 and only 55 affordable units so if you figure two people per household we should have adam something like three hundred thousand household we're vastly under producing that's true in the city as well the other fact that is really i will say driving the angst in san francisco the crisis intervention erosion of rent control program and the crisis intervention control of stock important to know that 46 percent of the housing supply

falls under rent control but with the crisis intervention vacancy decontrol if particular you're seeing rents rise enormously as tenants move and off their have litigation or not and increased owner move-ins that is eroding the existing housing stock within an accelerated pace over the last years and some other deductions to the housing supply that is minor in numbers of short-term rentals and absentee owners those are relatively small but all combined are placing enormous pressure on the crisis intervention housing supply and 43 percent of households are paying more than the crisis intervention sort of accepted industry standard, if you will,

in terms of for rent and here's how it plays out in san francisco in the case we're looking a one bedroom units to the left hand and two bedrooms on the read side those are rents the crisis intervention average rent in san francisco and i think are from earlier this year in january so probably higher now 035 hundreds for a one bedroom and blow in the crisis intervention left-hand side column had is household can actually afford and you can see all the way to middle-income families there's a quite a gap what we can afford the thirty percent level of income in terms of the market-rate of rentals and in the next column thank you two bedroom again an enormous gap $2,800 the crisis intervention middle versus 36

hundred in the rents charged - we're producing new housing and with stableing the existing be stock you know that that is important to remember what we're talking about one slice of pie so we have inclusionary requirements with the crisis intervention recent ballot measure so paying for some share of new affordable units and we have underway a number of 100 percent affordable units in the pipeline we have prongs that are supported by tax increments financing through occ but those are limited in number of finite because the crisis intervention authority has end we're playing out and going back and mention