helps the crisis they don't dr. the specific data yet to actually suggest a project has the impact at the very local listed level and more researcher on that it does not isn't not in hand there's a lot of anecdotal evidence that might be the case but no localized data of an individual development. >> and the challenges we have you're talking to the right people. >> the other work as well as and i think you know if i could i mean, there's general agreement the gentrification happening to the mission and other neighborhoods some of that happens regardless of new development; right? the question whether the new development accelerates liquor

gentrification and displacement that's the conversation. >> that's the scenes of our conversation people low more often and displace people what's the effect of the hours accelerated or mitigated things we've been talking about you're right on the money director rahaim thank you very much. >> i like the alleged pdr i think you know admirable we're not replacing and referring the pdr there will be an effect of 2 percent over time it will be 100 percent and but i support of pdr the one of the issues i have is parking i know you're using stackers but on a corridor three or four blocks from bart yet 53 spaces is a lot we've talked about that theoretically and

maybe not practical when we had those projects and potrero hill i said parking or pdr convert some on the first floor and a light bulb that is underground but looks like a lot of parking spaces but they're on stackers. >> commissioner moore. >> with respect to director rahaim's comment i'll make a motion to continue let's see conversation with you i'll ask the director one week if? the correct amount of time. >> commissioners the one week based on for additional wanted to review the information i guess the question if there are substantial design changes i'll

suggest there is not enough time because you will need to work with the architect to make the design changes and have those in your packets clearly the publth are prepared for invocation. >> two tiers the basic 2020 and sub you cannot information and underpinning of those information and the typical extraneous thoughts the commission wants to preview the project that come forward as cu having said that, 50i78d of i'm not sure substantive nature of our discussions with the mission people is what mostly drives an expression of dissatisfaction from the short comments that commission made

so i'm asking you basically guidance. >> i guess what i'll node recommend having another hearing invocation i will not recommend 3 hearings it is relatively might have project so from the commission direction to have work more within the architects we need more time but i would - there's a hearing date i believe in the middle of july that is possible but you know, i guess that's my recommendation if you think that the design changes - i i guess my remedies to do two things the design changes and as well as the some of the responses on the interim controls. >> i will prefer the latter

date partially i strongly feel we need to spend the mind to deliver a thoughtful frontages in that part of the mission. >> so that requires to go to july we should basically initiate reactuation on those levels. >> so the agreement with the project sponsor with the community is a week to hear the alleged facts of the interim controls not for architecture i think we're assuming we'll not be needing a continuance to love mr. hayward to speak to that. >> a desire to spend time on the earthquake the skin of the building i want to continue i agree with director rahaim we'll be happen with a three or four continuance that would be helpful a commissioner can be

involved in those discussions so we have a sense of what the commission is looking for. >> commissioner johnson. >> sorry commissioner moore you're going to pick a date. >> sec. >> july 14th normally 4 weeks from today i'm sorry not that i'm a voting member i'm on vacation that week but certainly embed without me. >> i have a sense the communities wants you to be here kindly pick a date you're here. >> i want to entering jefferson county we approved a large project 8:00 hundred units that was just design related clearly design related staff can

work with the architect is this the kind of project we can do to speed it up hear it in a week i'm looking at the precedence from before commissioner moore what do you think that type of project. >> i will ask the gentleman to weigh in he was part of castro project the push back was substantial and okay elements this project needs to be really rethought amongst other things and into the reality what do you think. >> i'm hearing concern over the material palate it is proposed by the architect and. >> the lack of material palate

consistency they call for a cement panel 9 majority of facade with the color elements in other peaceable that will take work not insurmountable but we certainly have precedence with a lot of the projects whereby we can work with a smaller group of the commissioners it refine the design elements you know and still - i'm not hearing from the commission regarding this overall massing so if it is a matter of refining the surface treatment and coming up with more the exterior elements i'm confident we can do that. >> i'll take our feedback we worked out from the difficult circumstances so basically go to route.

>> i'm recommending sxhoerp to change our motion for a week. >> if it is amenable i'll change the motion for a week. >> second. >> i didn't take my turn. >> i'm sorry commissioner johnso so a second and the date is june 23rd i have a quick question for director rahaim and staff so just on the question of the analysis on the mission area controls and map 2020 commissioner vice president richards mentions a talk with a berkley professor and research and also in the controllers report themselves they sort of are very sort of they don't as their finding really work on a micro project by project level my question what analysis are we hoping to do in a week in

relation to project. >> we can't do unlikely an initial analysis the community wants more time to dive into the exciting analysis we can do obviously not in your packet address some of the detailed. >> yes. rays citing sections i don't know if we have time to do much analysis. >> some of the comments about making sure the accuracy in the reports and we're powell the right references to the project i want to make sure we're not going to - it's going to be hard firefighter this project and those reports in those reports say they're hard to target at micro level i want to

make sure a week to get everyone comfortable their applying the controls of the project and putting the right view not necessarily we'll be able to make specific finding what is in the report. >> that's a good way arrest characterizing is and not scheme of things a modest project eve there were ways to address this this size of the project will have those effects. >> thank you commissioner hillis. >> so i'm supportive of a week's continuance and a lot of the the comments on the design it needs work it is an interesting context and residential and the design of the building should respond it didn't get there on the studies i brought this up on the interim

controls this kind of someone quote from one study and something else from another quote this imaginedless debate on somehow this building this will help you know lower the prices or somehow not building helps you have to look at bernal heights and other places to see the entire city is faced with the housing crisis i said when we did did sgrrmd are there ways to make those projects better and can we add pdr or arc uses on the ground floor we're displacing those if we get into that project by project analysis this project is increasing gentrification and a wait rating it is worse than bernal heights

we'll be an endless studies and face the consequences we're not this enough hours loans one percent last year so let's try to make the projects better but an endless economic study will not get us there. >> commissioner antonini. >> i agree when he talked about the mission chronicles we didn't expect every single project to do it's others impact study they have to refer to blanket studies we've dealt what the impacts of market-rate housing in various areas what they'll generally conclude with the impacts they do that maybe more detail in the studies i carry a couple many any briefcase i'll quote many part of that invocation when we bring

it up and find other studies in the meantime, so the main which i know thing that's what we asked them to do and make sure we have wanted to read the studies their refer to and the other issue the district court of san francisco something question should be happy a lot of the cities want to move to invest in them and build their businesses there and it hazard side effects but a good problem to have and we have to judge this project on the individual merits and what we've asked the projects and not ask it to be something that will cower everyone's problems a fairly small project so long as is does the things it should do it needs

design challenges. >> call the question. >> a motion to continue commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu and commissioner vice president richards so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> commissioners that places us on item 17 case 4529 18th street arrest plaintiff good evening erica planning department staff before you a conditional use authorization for reactivate the ground floor incremental tenant space an 18th street it - located and front of the