also recommending closing upright or your unexpended encumbrances of 75.763 of which 51 519 is general fund so together, the general fund recommendations total 895 .826 and only see that number on page 27 of our report. in 17-19 recommend reductions total 761.556 and 17-18 of that 761 556 and recommend reductions 660.534 ongoing. 92.982 or one-time savings. mr. chairman and members of the committee, let me say is respectfully, these are our final recommendations. there is no going back to that apartment. we have gone round and round with the departments. it would be futile to have further discussions that i haven't said that with any other departments. was respectfully, that is my judgment. the me just in general, supervisors, you remember last year. i told

you that that apartment had salary seedings had way too much in salaries. that they would never spend it. we do not accept the recommendations and let me tell you what happened last year. in fact, that apartment is projected to have a $3.2 million salary surplus this year. last year the department had $4.7 million could supervisor weiner, this is not a question of where we are taking money away. it's a question of they can't spend it as fast as you give it to them. that's all we are saying here we are not saints reduce services. we agree that these projects are very very important. we're only saying to the board, if you want to have a additional funds to reallocate, you might as well take money that we know they

will never be expanded this year. you can give them all the money in the world that they can expend it is not to be expended. that's why we're making the recommendations that we are making. specifically, on page 28 of the report, we say increase savings by $600,000. to account for the diamonds accounted surplus of two point 4,000,015-16. 32 vacant positions reported by the department as of april 30, 2016. the department's production of attrition savings of $386,000 and 16-7. that's a one-time reduction. on page 29 of our report, with respect to the claimant purchases, we say to leave for replacement vans. the barman is requesting-now this is different by said they cannot spend the money. they could spend this money. delete

for replacement vans gather barman is requesting for the placement bands that were put into service in 1999 through 2004. according to the city's fleet management reports department currently has 35 vans seven which were purchased in the last three years have no recent mileage. this is from fleet management. this is not our numbers. these 35 vans have an average mileage of less than 3200 per year and each of an average maintenance cost of $7000 per year. therefore, the product should have sufficient vans to meet the operational needs without purchasing [inaudible] older vans if their maintenance costs exceed their usefulness. on the right-hand side of the bottom of page 26, delete one replacement band, partners requesting one replacement plan in 17-18 and 21, a quarter disease fleet

management report the department probably has 35 vans , seven of which were purchased in the last three years have no recent mileage. again, this the same explanation. on page 30 of our report, 4017-18 recommendation to delete two new suvs that apartment is requesting to replace two vans. the prominence requesting three total suvs of which we recommend approval of one suv to replace an existing suv disapproval of two. as we previously as i previously mentioned mother, and has 35 vans, seven of which which were purchased in the past three years of which the city's fleet management division reports no recent mileage. on the bottom of page 30 in fiscal year 16-17, we say to delete one new 1824 principal analyst, the position

in the open data group currently they opened out group has five positions including chief officer, to program managers, to geographic information specials. the five existing positions are sufficient to accommodate the workload of the open data group including new initiatives. on page 31 of our report,-so to make it clear, that apartment disagrees with every single one of our recommendations. they do not agree with anything. on page 31, reduce the budget for the contract to match actual historical spend actual spending on the contract was 57,014-15 and 44,015-16. we are recommend that they get $60,000. well above what they been expending the last two years.

on the bottom of page 31 in fiscal year 16-17, reduce the contract or project manager services by $150,000. the apartment has use content managers in the permanent staff but higher for full-time 5504 project managers and 15-16 which should provide sufficient project managers resources. if you hire staff you need less outside consultants. on 17-18 similar recommendation, which would be a go from three or $92,000 to zero. we say reduce the contractor project management services to zero instead of in 18 department has use content managers and will permanent staff but higher for full-time project managers and 15-sick did in fact, its general policy of the board if we can get civil servants to do the job then that apartment can reduce the contract shall service it. that's what we are saying. now, just a little more information supervisors. i want to state that that are

increased to increase savings by $6000, that accounts for 32 vacant positions in historical understanding. the department reduced its attrition target for fiscal year 1617 x 300 $86,000. they went down but has 32 vacant positions. but as i just mentioned to you, the department is projected to have and the controller can contradict me if i'm wrong, the department is projected to have a $3.2 million salary surplus in this fund this year. last year the department as i said had eight $4.7 million surplus. our recommendations are very reasonable. they've got millions of dollars that they simply cannot and will not spend. that's why were making this recommendations. that's

why there's no going back to the apartment. we been around and around. given the millions of dollars unspent funds that apartment can implement their recommendations about any reduction in service whatsoever. regarding the new vehicles, the only thing i would add is, or emphasize, we are recommending approval of two of the new vehicles. were recommending disapproval of seven. so there's nine new vehicles in total and again our recommendation to approve to add it disapprove seven. we point out, as i stated that apartment has seven existing vans purchase with the last three years. but each of which have no mileage, no recent miles reported according to the league management division. i don't know what else to say,

supervise. that's a recommendations. will be happy to respond to any questions. >> thank you. supervisor tammy >> thank you for your report. one of the piecesi would have mind going over in more detail is the attrition fees with ms. rose if we could continue because i feel a little uncomfortable not knowing the details as i think about. the others i would say i will be supportive of the mr. rose's recommendations. >> okay. colleagues from any comments or questions? i think this is one where we do have i understand on every line item we could take action on some or all here today. supervisor yee, new york doesn't continue the discussion on one of them or another option is to bring the department of technology back next wednesday for open discussion on the entire budget. commissioner >> would you like me to respond to summit

>> sure. >> we had some conversations ongoing dialogue with mr. rose's office and i fully acknowledge the attrition numbers in fact that's what we were attempting to come to an agreement on that attrition. the number is actually it is still significant but as run down because we have really made that change in the staffing situation by execution of a hiring plan that execution and the planning is continuing going forward. so we think you will continue to go down over time but certainly willing to have a conversation about what that correct target >> could you tell the committee mr. chairman, how much you think you could be reduced from your salary savings this year? where we could increase attrition saves. you just indicated you could do that. can you tell me the number? >> i think what we contacted that with was $700,000. in addition to the current projected attrition.

>> what was that all about? >> 700 the current recommendation i think was six. we added $100,000 to it. >> hold on. let me understand that. you said you could do a higher attrition savings in the budget analyst is recommending >> >> yes we are doing negotiations to preserve the vehicle and [inaudible] services. >> i think to clarify, we have been having we give these recommendations of the apartment over a week ago and it had one long meeting and several phone calls. our concern was we actually a recommendations are based on actually information that we had analyzed and we think are good recommendations. while they were willing to were straight, we do believe that some of the other recommendations were once we thought should be given up that

i think one area that is still-we has a standby or other recommendations as they are in the reports. i think the one area where there's been a dispute is there disagreement with the fleet management reports on their vehicle usage but we haven't received any other information that tells us something different than what the management has said about their fleet vehicle uses. >> okay. colleagues, but it's tempting to take action today. i would be in favor of continuing this discussion until next wednesday. i think this further discussion to be had around spots on fleets, it is like their savings to the agreed-upon here but it strikes me a little but of time might help out here and that's what we have next wednesday for. my colleagues, again i'll take that >> i agree >> what will you then we'll have you back next wednesday. i would ask mr. rosen, as the department as well, that ongoing discussions about fleet seems like there's more information to be exchanged

let's do that. then, let's meet as well with my office and then we can pick this up on one circuit >> yes, sir >> okay. all right thanks so that is that for five and six will come back. are you ready to roll? okay. why do we close that item 5 and six. ms. rose didn't want to say something >> the only thing i want to inquire mr. chairman, we did a report on the item 9 could item of you call that is equivocal that yet. we originally was that of the piano bar jumped and i'm sure we're running longer than we thought. so, we'll just take the board of supervisors generator will close at five and six until tomorrow. and we'll call these other items. just to be clear we have two, three, and i'm left. >> and item 18 to the clerk. >> >> mdm. clerk would you please

call item 18 >> item 18 >>[reading code] >> we will listen to item 18 mr. chairman. should we walked out? >> were fine. >> members of the committee, angela calvino i'm here today with joe-our admin deputy. were please to present to you that a promise proposed 16-17 and 7-18 budget. consideration. there's many to thank their systems and careful review that opponents budget to mention quickly john

lee theresa cao, christine-melissa white house debra newman evidently joel-. as public employees in the clerk's office of public boswell for a moment to watch this quick presentation and i want to just say your the individuals truly responsible for the success of an apartment and i express my sincere gratitude to all of you and two other key members in the leadership team of the clerk's office. now to the business. in february, the committee approved the proposed budget as a result of provide a very brief high-level summary and focus mostly on the few changes from that review today. i will state at the outset were in agreement with a budget analyst recommendations. this budget was developed as part of core mandates and omission of our office. a lot has happened behind the scenes to provide operational support to connect our data to the public and to provide administrative support to the board. our ethics requires us to take a magic seriously to be successful at bringing the public into the process by providing open and equitable access to our information. in the current

year, with the public informed by created over 600 agendas and minutes processing over 1500 legislative matters and multiple requirements associate with each of those items, creating and posting numbers of legal notices, spun into high volumes of public information requests and this year we've seen 53% reduction in the number of new appeals filed at the 80 8b the 64% reduction in the number of open appeals pending before the aab. that is just a sliver of some of the work performed in the clerk's office. in the coming months, the office of city civic engagement and immigrants of this in conjunction with our office will present a report of the work for the language access pilot program. for your review. and consideration. a quick review of the proposed

budget revenue. the premise projected assessment appeals board revenue is decreasing about $300,000. in the budget years. this is due it's a significant drop in the appeal cases at the aab due to stronger state markets expect that trend to continue in the budget year. on the topic of the assessment appeals you may recall that apartment received funding to alleviate backlog of appeals in this courier 13-14 and 15-16 were please to report the backlog has been tackled as of march of this year. i would like to thank us as her chew and her staff for their excellent and ongoing collaboration with other departments as the assessor stated earlier today, the assessor's office has initiated it davis 44 one the process which has helped to significant way minimize the number of appeals that are been scheduled by working with the taxpayer on better scheduling were negotiating which leads to a withdrawal altogether of an appeal. potentially. the city is also rolling out its ee signature capability this year. that combined with our rolling out of our online filing last year at the aab, we expect to be ready to deal with the next round of appeals. when the market downturns. this

slide also format as before it shows the department expenditures by category for the current year budget year, your two, and the changes. as you can see, the apartment proposed expenditures total very small increase of $30,000 in the budget year and 187,000 in the out you. currently is no changes proposed twice staffing level. instead, the department is proposing an upward and went downward substitution for $15,000 total cost to align physicians without operational needs. the budget also includes a small increase attempt salary bump of $5000. in the next three months we hope to fill some of the vacant positions that become vacant in this past year. so that we can keep pace with our operational requirements. the increase in salary and benefits you see the table of the natural bake basin which was due to mou salary increases and benefits and cost. this is shows quite minor

departmental changes proposed in the budget from the committee's review in february. spivak oh made their wacko made their official request at $10,000 than the 50,000 estimated in february. it equals to about 40,000 rfid like to note the musty general fund laughter request in fiscal year 17-18. that actually will come in favorite. lastly, the: to the budget and was later and goes on to item 18 on the agenda save the budget was that of analyst joint bent venture partnership has requested 2.5% with adjustment to the contract, which would be effective july 1 of 2016 if approved. tel aviv $40,000 increase to the current contract amount $2.13 million for a total contract amount of $2.175 million. this fund is currently assumed in the budget proposal. finally, i would like to discuss projects in our horizon. i'm very pleased to

announce that the city is replacing the-system installed nearly 20 years ago, this audiovisual touch panel on your desks is hardly viewable by you and no longer serviceable by media services. with the generous support of the capital planning committee funding for this replacement here in the chamber is funded by the city administrator and the fiscal years 16-17 budget and i would like to knowledge partnership john updike from those the division and david came from media services for their tremendous work thus far provide any assistance they need to up the scoping and procurement of the system and particularly acknowledge our city of mr. know me kelly drabek is your leadership on this project. while not a part of the current budget i would you share with you the plans for new agenda management

system. next few years the department will undertake a project to replace the city's core agenda legislative management system. the contract will and in fiscal year 18-19. by vision for the system is comfortably equipped with the new drafting tool. attacking searching reporting, audit functionalities to ensure quality control and accountability to be uploaded, to of all the pre--1998 archives uploaded to it could with a new user tool for increased efficiency will also contain emerging technology for mobile compatibility remote access and open government needs. this system one hands everyone's experience. so, the apartment is robust and poised to tackle the modernization of our technology needs. while continuing to provide our core services. we appreciate the opportunity to serve the city and thank you for your

consideration of our budget request. were here to answer any question. >> thank you. supervisor tang >> thank you for your presentation glad to hear the end agreement with a budget analyst. one of the things i know that was not in this presentation, but will be occurring is the salary increase for the legislative assistant positions. there is of course the automatic adjustment on july 1 3.25%, but it was also an additional ago she had one at 2.5% through an amendment to the mou for the legislative assistant. so, i just want to see if were going to be using the mou reserve for that increased for the second of the 2.5%? >> of adequate conversation with nikki callahan who indicated to me she's checking into that. that is my expectation as it is pro forma to use the fund the mou reserve fund for any mou increase your changes >> okay, great because i certainly understand the 3.25% for july 1 being as part of our

budget and normal process. however, for the additional 2.5% that will be occurring, i would like to see that come out of the mou resort. >> thank you supervisor >> i think that's the intended purpose. thank you >> okay. mr. rose. on our budget analyst question. were supervisor budget. sorry. >> members of the committee, on page 70, and actually, let's go to page 71. recommend a reduction superposed budget total $67,000.87 in 16-17 of

that amount, 57.420 ongoing to 9000 657 or one-time savings and we also recommend closing out by the unexpended encumbrances of 1.357. that would result in total general fund savings of 68.444 and 17-18 our recommended reductions to the budget total 31.831 of which ongoing savings in these drug reductions would still allow an increase of 155.391 1.1% independence 17-18 budget as i understand apartment does concur with the recommended reductions which are shown on page 70 2-73 of our report. >> okay. thank you mr. rose. carly, any questions or comments can i entertain our budget analysts recommendations and pending public comment on

monday. moved and seconded. can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. san diego >> for item >>[gavel] >> item making any deals want to address on it? >> i think my presentation covered. >> will open up to public the public on item 18. anyone wish to comment on this item. seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> colleagues item 18, i would just say that the inclined to accept this item. as we did a: for all of our third-party contractors last year in the budget that was not reflected that they do all this work i'd like to support what open up the floor to any questions or comments. motion by supervisor yee to move item 18 out with a positive recommendation. mr. city attorney can we do that.

fall board of supervisors were moving that closer? >> the clerk has a preference you can set up to july 12 with a budget >> okay with you with a budget. okay. so motion by supervisor tammy for positive recommendati moved and seconded. can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. >>[gavel] >> without the closing out our departments reynoso colleagues connected in a motion to continue items five and six to our budget committee meeting for tomorrow? moved and seconded. can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. >>[gavel] >> with that mdm. clerk call item 2, please >> we can do two and three together >> item number two >>[reading code] item number three, >>[reading code]

>> okay, thanks. i know the director is a. >> good afternoon supervisors. the first resolution is requesting your approval for the contracts for official newspaper advertising pursuant to san francisco administrative code 2.80 and 2.81. the estimated value is $420,000. the term of the contract is for the next fiscal year beginning july 1, 2016 and expiring june 30, 2017. the results from oca competitive solicitation were of value weighted as prescribed by the administrative code. this year, oca received bids

from the san francisco examiner and the san francisco chronicle. we like to share those results with you now. the highest scoring and responsive bidder with the san francisco examiner scoring 29 point 4/32 points. as required by the administrative code, were also reporting these san francisco chronicle score of 24.4 points. however, the san francisco chronicle's bid is considered nonresponsive because the bid was not submitted on time and did not meet the administrative code requirements of being printed within city limits. because san francisco chronicle's bid was nonresponsive, oca cannot recommend a word to them. as in prior years, the board has the

discretion to award the contract as you see fit to best serve the city's needs for public noticing. however, we are recommending award to san francisco examiner. the second resolution is regarding our outreach advertising bid. i'm also here to present the results of the bid, and it's estimated value for the next fiscal year is $20,000. the purpose of this contract is to reach a range of separate and diverse communities with information about the city's activities and operations. the term of this conduct is also for one year beginning july 1, 2016 oca has conducted a competitive solicitation this year good oca reached out to 49

local newspapers, inviting them to bid and received 10 bids. one bid was withdrawn at the request of the better. as required by the administrative code, where reporting results of our evaluation. as you can see, there's a range of communities served by the current bidders. as well as three different neighborhoods throughout the city. all of the bids received were nonresponsive because they did not submit complete bid documents on time. we allowed all the bidders for outreach advertising an opportunity to submit additional documents in order to evaluate the bids for the administrative code

requirements. the total of seven vendors met the bid requires and two vendors-and san francisco bayview did not meet the bid requirement because they are either printed out side outside the city limits in or not printed with a frequency prescribed in the administrative code. as in prior years the board has the discretion to award the contract as you see fit to serve the city's needs for public noticing. historically, the board has awarded this contract to most or all bidders creating a pool publications accessible to meet department specific requirements. i'll be happy to answer any questions you have about this contract and our recommendations. >> thank you. supervisor weiner >> thank you. a question i have about the item 34

community advertisement and neighborhood outreach advertising. san francisco weeklies been recommended as the lgbt publication over the, but not be a bay area reporter even though the bir is an actual lgbt focused newspaper whereas the sf weekly is not. as of weeklies been recommended as the chinese outreach newspaper and not the [inaudible] daily correct me if i wanted even though it's a chinese language newspaper whereas sf weekly is not, and then for the latino community, sf weekly is recommended [inaudible] even though--is a latino focused publication whereas sf weekly is not. then, so i guess in the

african-american community is one publication up printed here but still sf weekly is recommended even though it's not an african-american focused newspaper. i don't-i understand your operating with certain data calculation it just seems like a very odd system we wind up with a result where every single community newspaper in terms of lgbt, african-american, latino, chinese, the actual newspapers that serve those communities are not being recommended. sf weekly got all of them. we can add without subtracting sf weekly, right? >> absolutely >> as i want to make a motion to add--in san francisco

bayview we can adam even those not printed in the city >> yes >> small business exchange as well? okay i'll be making a motion to add all those newspapers >> then, also colleagues any comments on as we've done in the past, that the chronicle as well? that i am too but just to be clear. >> yes. i want to add the chronicle in addition to the examiner for the more general item number two. >> okay. colleagues, we go through this drill drill every single year. i believe some of the people in public comments are here year after year is going to thank you for sticking on good i'm sorry this is taking longer. 01 public comment first then we can make motion. >> if i may, i have silly anyone wants to make public comments, i'm in a hazard a guess this public support on this committee for adding these cell people are welcome to make

public comment actually have a right to do that but i'm going to guess this is not to be a [inaudible]. >> i think this in. anyone with 2 min. to wishes to speak and public comment please line up against the far wall. if you like to submit to move this along. getting gauges close to time here. >> thank you supervisor my name is diane-that san francisco chronicle and want to clarify when you mentioned our bid was late the reason why is late is because we were not notified of the deadline until a week after. i'm not sure what happens. looks like once i saw the e-mail there seemed to be a couple of errors in the e-mail so maybe he was just a simple technical glitch. better write it off to that but that was the reason why was late. usually we are we summit the bids before the board like a couple of days and i also want to thank you for considering us and thank you for your support over the years and i just want to let you know that now we've each

one and 62% of the adult population in san francisco county and we reach 64% of the adult voting population. so again thank you very much for your support. >> thank you next speaker, please. >> thank you supervisor your time to get money mistake with san francisco media company san francisco examiner and sf we could get out of a good opportunity >> san francisco examiner's eyes circulated newspaper in san francisco only daily newspaper published locally. with only one that qualifies for the bidding process by getting our bidding on time. we provide ourselves being the heartbeat of the city with the editor team focusing on [inaudible] 90% of our news is written locally in this informative relevance to the

residence of speaking. is a free publication the board over 820 racks and san francisco the examiner is easily accessible throughout the city mr. city diverse income affect communities. with our newspaper in those racks we put out was a dirty racks with 97.5% pickup rate on those racks which means our newspapers getting red wanted by the people in our community. in addition to the conference of local editorial content we offer readers to medicine access to local san francisco businesses to advertising as well as community events to event sponsorship. as the city of san francisco hutto circulated newspaper we do out circulate the chronicle the printed copy and san francisco by more than 80,000 on sundays with and 55,000 on thursdays, and monday , tuesday, thursday more than 19,000 copies and sides san francisco can. is my time up? >> 3 second warning >> okay advertising costs are less than the chronicle that reach into the community sport represents. that's your conduct is been awarded for the event

examiner on chronicle six month alternate ambrose. we all as recommendation he made the examiner turned to be the full fiscal year that reach the community and reduce our great cities cost. >> thank you. envy us was to comment on this item? sir, do you wish to comment on item 2 or three? please, come on up. >> my name is martin ramirez thank for adding [inaudible] i want to say something that i think you would make this buses better. one is that the [inaudible] when the proposition j was created there were about five or more printers available. now there's only one and it's not feasible for a small paper to print here for many reasons. price,

service and all that. we have no option but effectively amended to the full board some out somebody can do it, i mean to add something that they can print outside in the absence of printers availability in san francisco that would be cool and the other one is that lately, we have not been getting any money from the fund those listed 10% because each department is taking it as a savings so they don't put it in the pool. they just save it as there's no money. we would like to have the 10% taken out and being put in the 10% for the average newspaper which was the original idea when proposition j was created to get funding so we can work more efficiently for communities. >> thank you. we do have

another speaker. these lineup. >> my name is dave solving. advertising director for the san francisco media companies think the opportunity to speak with you guys this afternoon. i promise i will be greeted i just will let you know the sf weekly distributed every thursday. it's free and we distribute 70,000 copies through a network of 1800 distribution points. these are all strategically located throughout the city of san francisco and the county. we deeply penetrate into all san francisco's communities including the african-american chinese hispanic and lgbt communities. each edition remains in circulation for whole wheat. sf weekly is san francisco highest circulated source of in-depth alternative news reaching a very diverse leadership. the weekly is locally written hunted and

distributed it we have over 90% pickup rate of our printed products by readers each week. we also can't knockout visual versions of the print copy which remain available on her website free of charge. sf weekly's editorial and advertising content are seen to inform about upcoming events and many gathered to the regular list to me that's the charge on calendar section. that the city's premier resource guide for up-to-date information on things that are coming up in alternative news. thank you. >> thank you. and just wish to comment on items two or three seeing none, public comment is closed. >>[gavel] >> supervisor weiner doing makes emotions? >> on the can motion on item 22 at the chronicle and on item 3 to add beef and bayview and small business exchange with respect to the african-american unity to add-daily with respect to the chinese community, to add

-perspective the latino community and to add the bay area reporter with respect to the lgbt communicate that promotion >> motion by supervisor weiner. it's something i fully support. i'm happy to do. moved and seconded. can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. >>[gavel] >> approve the underline items two and three is meant. >> committee report. >> committee report, yes. moved and seconded. can we take that without objection? without objection the motion passes. >>[gavel] >> item mdm. clerk call item number nine last item >> item number nine >>[reading code] >> mr. updike. >> good afternoon chair director real estate this is a

acquisition copy located at 456 street. this follows a discussion by the board of supervisors in january of 2016 good i'm going to quote from the direction from the board which was transcribed and provided and supplied in the budget legislative analyst report. the board verbally urge the department of real estate to begin negotiating at the four adjacent properties near the hall of justice. he 14, 820, 444 six, 456, and 476 did the board of supervisors would consume consider legislation approving these acquisitions. the bushes and continue with all those owners. one acquisition has been struck an agreement and that's before you today. we felt it prudent to bring this forward because we feel it's a strategic opposition within a block adjacent to the hall of justice. there's a current lease on the property that lease would be assigned to the city as landlord

. we would continue the operation until such time as a future uses determined and a timeline is set for that use until then that would be a simple rent paying tenant of the city. acquisition is the price of $2,000,000.4 thousand that is the last than the approve great value of $2.7 million reflective of economic rent being different than contract rents. i'm happy to answer any questions you might have about this purchase. >> okay. thank you. colleagues, any questions? it throws there's no report on this. to report on this item. okay you do. >> yes, you mr. chairman. members of the committee, on page 4 of the report of mr. updike just indicated, the proposed purchase price is $2,000,000.4 thousand with 346 less than the recent appraisal of 2.7 million dollars. on page 5 of our report, as shown in

table 1, the net cost of the city for the subject property would be approximately $2.4 million and table 2 also on page 5 shows the projected annual rent operating expenses that annual rent revenues and operating revenues tuesday by the city each year through april 30, 2026 when the existing lease for the subject property at 456 street expires and is shown in table to the lease extension the extent the entire to the cities projected to receive 1 million of net accumulative rental revenues.. we recommend that we consider approval of this proposed resolution to be a policy before the board of supervisors >> thanks. colleagues have any questions or comments? will move on to public comment. mr. updike >> just one technical amendment the clerk calmly reminded me of. in the title, we had a typo the block number is stated as 30 750. actually