>> good afternoon i'd like to call the san francisco board of education it is 1:308 p.m. roll call. >> commissioner courtney commissioner caen commissioner moran and will we have quorum next item. >> item 3 approval of the minutes of may 24, 2016, a motion to approval of the minutes. >> so moved second any questions or comments any public comment on item the minutes hearing none the minutes pass item 4 general public comment.

>> oh, thank you get a vote to approve minutes. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the minutes carry forward next item is general public comment now the opportunity for public comment on matters not on the agenda today. >> good afternoon. >> eddy with bright line dws here to speak on two items not before in commission first, the strongest loophole hiring this is released by the office of office of economic workforce development you're aware the local hiring by this the president has been very strong compared to other 5 contracting

departments overall the city exceeded it's mandated goal of thirty percent and most projects in the city on average up to 45 percent that's phenomenal so much you've seen press in the last week we pleaseer and no where is 12 apparent in the san francisco board of education as you see in the handful i've provide originally the public works commitment was 35 percent year to year 35 percent 25 but under the thirty it jumped to 47 percent beyond the average target thank you to the department for it's continued commitment to the segment to make sure those jobs are good paying jobs for the local community and the second is an

update on the screen for bayview hunters point as before is not included in the napping that is age injustice in the environmental sense and the socio economic seasons and we'd like the sfpuc to be engaged the legislation has encouraged cal to expedite it's process in updating the tool and it will include the stated on a number of occasions socio economic factors and having any lens by this department lead to the building of a coalition of 8 coalitions in the letter i presented last time to make sure that over the summary as cal updates the tool the sfpuc can agendize this leadership in san

francisco as well doing the team david chiu and senator mark leno. >> thank you congratulations on behalf of the local hiring numbers to the department for the general manager thank you so much for the commitment to local hiring for those great numbers we're receiving appreciate that. >> thank you. >> any other general comments on matters not on the agenda hearing none, next item. >> communication. >> anything on communications questions or comments? . hearing none, next item. >> item 6 other commission business. >> commissioners. >> hearing none, public comments on commission bizarre next item. >> item 7 is report of general

manager. >> good afternoon commissioners i have the honor to recognize a couple of retirees which one day soon hopefully i'll be amongst them (laughter) so the first one is a gentleman that worked at the oceanside plant actually had an opportunity to talks kindergarten can you come up? so he's retiring from the puc after 31 years of service began his service in the southeast plant and at oceanside for the last several years and he provides oversight to the wastewater at treasure island we will miss his positive spirit and professionalism actually, they said that they simply call you can do laughter

i made that up (laughter) but mia anyway, we are really going to miss our service here and hopefully, you will come and visit us and i know we've talked about you'll do a lot of traveling between travels if you can come back and tells you hi we would like to continue with - you want to say a few words. >> thank you very much everyone i'm not a good speaker but a good analyst so. >> so on behalf of the commission congratulate you and thank you for your many years of service and wish you best on your retirement a certificate we want to present to you if you, you can come up here.

>> (clapping.) >> thank you. >> (clapping.) >> are there any public comments on this item hearing none, next item on the general manager report. >> the second retiree is a gentleman that actually, we go way back doctor toy can come up it's kind of mixed mediations to see you go we start when i started he

was sort of our mentor and so toy and i have a long history but toy has served as the executive director of the southeast community facility for the last 24 years toy was born in nigeria and came to this country in 1965 and moved into san francisco in 1974 a recent he received a academy training in the health care field and you know as we mentioned one of our mentors were alex pitcher and definitely provide us with a lot of training and you followed in his footprint and so i know that the community that you have been rep our

treatment facility you have been really strut of us and that's a testimony of you working with the southeast commission to really help us fulfill a lot of the promises i'm really going to miss you and we'll stay if contact other offices we want you to continue to participate in as well i'll let you talk about your daughter thank you for your service and if you want to say a few words. >> thank you overhead please

good afternoon, commissioners i sincerely thank you for honoring me today thank you for all you, you do i admires our tenet and presenter your support for i've been blessed to have represented our facility commission in this with the most devised committee in san francisco and i'm proud to call bayview district any community i'd like to give special attention to the executive director helen i consider a family friend in 1996 our daughter toy and opportunity to walk for the project and now she's an actors in la and won

the 2016 end of the walk for the best late actress in la also want to thank the hard working san francisco public utilities commission staff and thank you our general manager for wastewater enterprise and juliette as the manager for external affairs and the community manage for the education to the community and they're ongoing financial logic support with my departure with the commission i'm leaving a solid staff who will continue to be dedicated to the community they are the commission secretary and eleanor herpes

corridor with our newly hired executive director dionne we continue to working closely with sfpuc as a team for the benefit of bayview hunters point residents looets i want to thank my wife not here in new york of 36 years my executive director of the acts and the daughter isabel in washington and toy who is here and my son in brazil teaching and coming back many week and the medical doctor for allowing me to do the work i love and again, thank you for all your support you've given from the commission and giving me this honor i have the joy and

look forward to working with sfpuc in the future good by and good luck and hello patience. >> so thank you very much and my daughter thank you for coming out from los angeles thank you. >> thank you. >> (clapping.) >> on behalf of the commission we just want to appreciate you for all your work and thank you for all your hard work we very much appreciate that congratulations on your retirement please come up we have something for you.

>> thank you. >> by any public comment on this next item. >> general manager. >> so the next item is and just want only the drought steve

richie. >> steve richie providing the just want this is quite short of first item over the weekend hetch hetchy filled and confirm that commissioner moran is filled and good news and the water bank is 84 percent of capacity much better than it has been our precipitation has leveled out pretty much done tour the year with the rainstorm and the snow pack is basically it melted heavily in the last two weeks we've seen the runoff coming down from that that provides about 6 hundred and 22 thousand feet of water available to the city we needed 8 hundred plus to

fill we're shy of that which is a bit unfortunate 1922 why we'll call for commercialism but better than over the past several years on the total deliveries front we have had warm weather this year deliveries are a little bit above last year's but see on the graph on the 5 year average line the red squares they're a black line dash dot dash dot the new target that we set for ourselves from 2013 our demands with well blow the the fact of the matter we have to meet so folks are doing the same that's a good thing and lastly on drought actions we continue to call for the volunteery demand of 10 percent

we as i said we've gone through the state water board process and not any state requirements levels for us we firmly believe that we need to achieve the 10 percent to fulfill the water bank and coming back to reduce the optical retail from thirty percent to 10 percent with an excess charge for the retail chars of mandatory 25 to a 10 percent with no fees charged it is different in the sf fee charge and working towards modifying the restrictions to incorporate in any statewide restrictions those are consistent nothing not doable on the list so with that, i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> commissioners? no questions at this time thank you very much

any public comment on the drought update? hearing none, next item. >> >> all right. next item is an update for cleanpowersf barbara hale. >> good afternoon barbara hale for power i have two items first a quick operations update, and, secondly, some information on our planning and effort for our august enrollment to in terms of operations we've began to receive payment from our customers that is good nice to see money coming in a small amount and proves our sidebars with pg&e and data management and transfer fund that happening with notable is it so working well, this is good we have issued our third opt out notice

out of the 4 that total that are required by statute the fourth notice is mailed in july we're experiencing about a 1.2 percent opt out out we're well blow the 20 percent and happy to see a 3 percent in supergreen offering we've set out in december of last year was 5 percent so we're doing pretty well on the supergreen uptake we so 4 hundred and 32 customers for the august enforcement that combination and the fact we had much lower opt out rates means if we stay on course and immoral 20 megawatts in the next phase

as we've planned and experience the same opt out rate we expect to exceed a total of 50 megawatts unless we take a different approach we've run the numbers we're assume before 5 to 10 percent opt out instead of the 10 and enroll the 20 megawatts we've serve a total of 55 or 56 megawatts full of customers i'm highlighting that when we started on this road we were talking about 50 megawatts thirty in the phase one and 20 in the second enrollment so our recommendation is to stay that course alm that we've had a lower opt out rate than expected and serve a total of 45 or 56 megawatts assuming the next set of

customers have a similarly low opt out rate we propose to then move forward with testing the market for the renewable procurement we'll need to serve that total 55 or 56 megawatts and if we find affordable prices available supply then we propose to move forward and improperly act target 80 megawatts in the august enforcement enrollment and serve 56 as of november so with that, i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> and then. >> what happens from november on. >> is he we are meanwhile making plans for subsequent phrases we're also putting together our resource procurement plan that is required sorry our renewable

procurement plan by the state of california and we're going looking to have a resource planning work that helps us make sure that our programs for customers like rooftop solar and be able efficiency and our procurement put together a good package of resources for our customers compliant with state law that's the next larger planning document that will bring forward the phasing effort figuring out you know what the the right size for the next phase that is our first page capacity and what the counter parties will require of us when we go out to procure more supplies to serve overseeing additional fees of customers we're doing more work on collecting the information for that now we have a bit find a track record seeing more community ago gas station

programs and implemented than 2 more to serve the customers this year i think the marketplace is getting suppliers is getting more comfortable with the model and certainly the low opt out numbers we're experiencing are encouraging from a financial picture. >> it sounds like good news commissioner moran. >> i've been getting a lot of questions about the the incentive programs we'll be offering for solar rooftop solar and that would be great to have a 1 or two-package document. >> sure. >> for people that are concerned. >> yeah. i know that you can ask for follow-up on supergreen and the go solar program and i think that last month at the end of the month whatever we had. >> one meeting so far and very

good responses from folks good participation and have a followup meeting next week the week after and be able to bring represents to the general manager and then to the commission. >> on how to continue the integration of cleanpowersf and go solar sf. >> i guess that pg&e still has a determination how much rooftop solar you can install; is that right. >> the expectation i believe this is in their transfer i'm not sure if it was bound by statute on this is that rooftop systems will serve will be sized to match the load behind the meter so there is an exception that you're not going to offer build

the system if you at that particular time in a net metering program if you participate in the program of selling the kilowatt hours and not consuming them the caps the sizes limitations are larger but they still exist. >> okay smells in our interests to encourage people to put an amount of solar their rooftop can support and an aggressive feed and tariff that supports that i'll be interested in what kind of caps. >> that's great feedback we've developing a feed and tariff your expectation to try to maximize the use of available space and so we are looking at

size limits that will probably be greater than most roofs available in san francisco it is consistent with the feedback you're getting. >> any other comments. >> i'm curious what are those folks that have opted out do they give a reason. >> we ask for a reason by opt out by calling us for most people that is varied i can bring back the statistics what we've learned from the interactions with the customers. >> i'll be interested. >> great i'll do that. >> anything else commissioners public comment increase mr. brooks are you making our way up here. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners good to hear that

good news i'm eric brooks with the eric brooks sf green party/our city/sf clean energy advocates. and the local grassroots organization in our city and just once again thank the staff for getting us where we are at slightly higher than one percent the best performance of my choice program in over one thousand this is incredible i think that is a strong signal we can move in customers and do a higher megawatt i urge you to push staff in 2, 3, 4 direction and calling your attention to hopefully seen the e-mail he sent last week that champions the sid neither under all the circumstances trail the master plan if not i'll make sure you get that all the community choice programs in the state are

getting off the ground and looking at the monopoly of utilities getting ready to switch to choose but the big drawback from the orienters of the community choice we've pushed for none of those plans has a comprehensive detailed local installations plan for renewables and the thing we push and push for, of course, the jobs component i sent the sidney australia to show you what an amazing report i recommend you read it i think we heard staff say their going to work on this thing with the sidney aau trail plan i'll have

one caution sidney australia relies on bio mass for i shouldn't say a lot but part of components are bio mass it is problematic be usually increases green house gas emissions and doesn't reduce them it seems like a good idea but i'll just add that one caution do model on sidney we make that mistake instead of that use battery storage to balance out accident load that is much better than mass and stuff like that so that's my one big comment about cleanpowersf look at the sidney model and get that concept for the citywide role and that's correct. >> yes. i'll hope that has a

plan develops we'll look to the cities everywhere to the development of the next phase good afternoon mr. fried. >> jason fried, executive officer wanted to talk about the opt out numbers increases the size by a few megawatts to not squeeze out the residential does the second part of the first launch the first was commercial with those that raised their hands hands and making sure the residential will be 20 megawatts assuming in the financial side i encourage you when staff talks about the approvals you're getting them to them and encouraging such actions the best way the more customers the more financially sound and the quicker to get to the jobs quickly and more to full launch out and others involved the

quicker is great i agree with mr. brooks with the next phases how we're launching let's continue to pay attention to the launch of the first phase the next group pay attention the residential group in november and that will be key to understand the future of cleanpowersf looks like it is continued to see the opt out numbers that will be larger than anything in the past large you you know than one or two percent out rate i encourage the staff to give the support to the extra 5 or 6 megawatts we're getting that to them as as soon as possible thank you. >> >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> >> the wastewater bond

sale. >> have the slides please. eric cfo of the public works i have a brief presentation and wanted to hit the highlights of our sale the revenue bonds on may 10th we actually sold the bonds on may 10th i made comments on that date but have more details in the presentation just to recap the transaction we sold $300 million in the wastewater bonds that is 75 percent were green bonds that means their certified by a third party they met certain standards, in fact, the highest standard for

climatic bonds the remaining writing to percent of issue was not certified as green the term of bonds is thirty years with an average of 21 years and we sold through the competitive transaction so whenever you move forward to issue bonds with the credit rating from the agencies and generally, you receive are firmer mansions we received an update from the standard and poorest we have on the table on the right-hand side of the slide the investment the two agencies for moody and at the top of the table is triple a the highest in the rating and at the bottom is

a minus grade and as you can see here we moody has firmed our double rating and updated our double a minus so we have our split ratings the s&p 500 is higher that's not uncommon they're more conservative the citing they cited a number of upgrading for the wastewater culprits within the continues long term financial plan improvements rate setting policy owe the demonstrated track record for the enterprise the first you got in the sfpuc and depending on kr9 supply it saves you, we estimate we saved 5 base points

that is one million dollars for other 3 beyond any doubt of one hundred million dollars issue not a significant savings so we entered the market with good credit ratings and a favorable market this the triple market 20-year rate this is the index of long term municipal rates we have the next graph over 1996 and 2016 and this is the equivalent of the same thing the treasurer bond for the security and you prices other securities of 0 of that that the index of the community bopped if you have a lower than a triple organization your rates are higher than that what is nobility the 20 years m

m.d. rates the 2 quarter on the day of the price has ombudsman lower in the past 10 years 29 days we've hit you don't i can't claim we have a crystal ball but hit a favorable market on the rates so we had a good ryan white and entered a good market and generate a lot of interest for transactions and had 8 and 9 bidders on various series the true interest costs as listed the 3 top bids for the series and what you see the spread of top bias are incredibly small from j.p. morgan chase was that percent are percent and the cover bid as you can see is in

scale with a fraction an incredible amount of interest in the transaction ordinarily when you sell transactions extensively the dollar writer was helpful and shared 23 investors and 3 had $4 million each those are the lowest the puc is lower than the past bond sales i believe since 2001 at least so favorable market doesn't ratings and it is a great combination. >> your crystal ball (laughter). >> and we received a lot of press coverage on this issue another interesting thing we were as i mentioned the first green bond with the standard and

we received press coverage thanks to our public affairs group in reuters the bond buyers and global bond intelligence and sf daily journal and from the white house we've got go more press and we're extremely happy with the sale and credit the financing team mike and others who did an amazing job completing that transaction i'm - i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you so much for this existing just want we are right on the cutting-edge of doing business we appreciate you in this space and hearing it is doing so well so far commissioners questions or comments. >> can you handle my retirement (laughter) after i retire. >> any public comment on this item hearing none, next item,

please. >> so my last item is the update on the wastewater enterprise. >> good afternoon, commissioners kathy howe for infrastructure we still have a few projects remaining in the wastewater capital improvement and with that there's one that is behind schedule all the construction is complete but we're negotiating with the contractor and holy thaip they'll be wrapped up that is for phase two so if you have any other questions i'll be happy to answer them. >> commissioners any public comment on this item? yes. >> good afternoon again eric

brooks sf green party/our city/sf clean energy advocates. this is more to the entire general manager report i want to say this at the end of the report it didn't apply only to cleanpowersf but the municipal program a new bill that is just passed unanimously in the state legislator supported by a democrat named mike called ac a-11 will put a ballot measure on november ballot that possibly will allow the legislator so eliminate the puc and that has a profound with the municipal power enterprise and cleanpowersf probably negatively impacting because politicians are subject to the pressures of the fossil fuel than the

problematic and it is easy to look at this bill and say let's get rid of of cpuc but you'll have experience with utilities that you know how dangerous that could be and i've talked about this yesterday at lafco and urge you and your staff to really look at this carefully and probably pass the senate but we may want to consider the agency and ask the senate not to pass them or consider the implementation if it does and how we'll manage ac a-11 and if the ballot measures passes by the public it required a 3/4ths vote we'll have a big battle you'll all have to engage on the regulations to create to shuttle the to be honest from the cpuc to other agencies and create new

agencies that it would be a huge task for you as an agency and us to make sure that that didn't end up being a disaster i want to flag that for you and i've sent an e-mail to staff i'll send an e-mail to you, you can look at the bill yourselves but this is scary and i think that is incumbent to get on it before that passes the senate and in this case it will be on the ballot thanks. >> thank you. i hope our legislative team a tracking this bill and brings us further updates through the general manager thank you. >> that concludes my report. >> thank you we will move to consent yes. >> please read the items.

>> item 8 of the all matters listed hereunder constitute a consent calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. a approve the minute to ss c abc and authorize the general manager to increase the agreement up to one million dollars plus b approve the increase in the construction contractor duration up to two hundred and 73 consequence active days and authorize the contract for a total of contract up to 4 hundred and 43 conservative calendar days and the b

consulting engineers and award the agreement and authorize the professional service for an not to exceed - with a duration of seven years and d the counteracting approval the modifications for reducing the contract by 14 thousand plus within an extension of 200 and 75 conservative days and e approve the contract for the continued contract and authorize the future modifications to the contract for a total contract go duration of one and 83 conservative days and accept the contract approve the modifications reducing the contract before i 200 plus and with conservative days and authorize the final a payment to

the contractor and next the r approve the modifications and there not to exceed by $48,000 plus and authorize the final payment to the contractor g i'm sorry h approve the spefktsdz and award the contract number announcement of 8 hundred plus to the lowest quality responsive bidder darcy construction i approve the specifications and award the contract in the amount of of $4 million plus to the lowest qualified responsive bidder m hernandez construction and j the award of contract in the not to exceed total amount of one million dollars plus to the lowest quality r0b8 and responsive bidder k authorize the agreement with

the association government for the administration and distribution of stat fund up to $3 million and recommend approval by the board of supervisors and e or l the memorandum of understanding with the community of alameda department of agricultural weights and measures with 3 years not to exceed $75,000. >> thank you. >> is there a request for removing any items i'd like to remove item 8 l and we'll take that separately a motion to approve the rest of the consent calendar. >> so moved. >> any public comment on the consent calendar mr. richie - all in charge. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? mr. richie on 8 l can you

explain what that is not a heavy poisoning and pesticides use. >> steve richie sunset general manager for water in all the pesticides we basically are hard and minimizing any use of pesticides and nicole i think the animal control not by pesticides by trapping or hunting different kinds of for the umuus weeds a combination of things sometimes manual removal we have to utilize certain pesticides we can provide follow-up details if you want exactly the kinds of things and in fact, there are a list on exhibit organization of different materials that are authorized that he p for use as

part of package again trying to minimize that we believe it necessary as part of program. >> yeah. i mean we want to make sure with the prompt to the water shed we're noting not only in compliance but no treat to our system in any way. >> an absolute essential we're not threatening our water supply and working with the department of environment. >> on this project. thank you. i understand there is public comment on this item too >> good afternoon. one more time eric brooks sf green party/our city/sf clean energy advocates. i actually also put in a request this item be certified one of the first ones i worked

on the first campaign in city hall issues was 1996 with the per day watch to get pesticides out of the public places especially near the water supplies the very next year i left there started the rule were racketsed to deal with specifications not possible and often happens that tier one herbicides with used tier used on plant are used to those are the most dangeroherbie won a small battle and department of the environment to get them to get away from the to her one herbicides and eventual as soon as possible to phase

them out so i would take issue with the fact it is alters necessary to use these especially near waterways and we're to protect endangered species and using the herbicides in a threatened wildlife and it is not desirable so what i'll urge user urge you to push our department through the general manager to aggressively work to use the tier one herbicides in those programs and i'm sorry to bring this up today at the last mini work on so many things i don't. no 3eg9 to put in non-binding language whereas to her one herbicides that cause cancer and otherwise are extremely dangerous to public

health should be minimize and something in the resolve clause to that asking the general manager to work to as aggressively as possible to minimize the herbicides in the control programs i realize that people are making their best efforts it is time to codify it with language and the public so saw wire trying to get e get away from the uses it falls under the radar and we'll hear in staff members from rec and park and the department of the environment well, we're minimizing it so i can tell you from the struggles in the department of the environment they're not minimum missing and translate to the work because their advised by 24 department you can add language that would be great. >> i'd like and this is an issue that is close to my heart he hired debbie to manage our

icm program before she went to the state and now back doing that i'm curious about what their involvement has been on this and if there's a way for her to make a recommendation i imagine enough conversation for this to appear before us. >> i mean, i think a couple years ago we did a joint meeting and talked about this whole thing the concern we're working collaboratively with them and trying to address the issue that's where the management and all the you know if you're going to put restrictions when the manager is consistent that is challenging so - >> mr. brooks mentioned the department of the environment took up to issue in the last 60 days the policy matter and concluded for certain

applications not used for other applications maybe minimize and one was in particular because of the size of the land we deal with our water shed lands so we've discussed at this point i don't know how many debbie was involved. >> if you won't mind i'm getting a recommendation from the deputy director for her recommendation and approval moving forward with the use of those pesticides make me more comfortable. >> i think it is appropriate to have a conversation for those of you who don't know local 4r0u6 represents the citywide across the departmental lines they've been engaged they're proud of the work they have a separate certification they glow on an annual basis up the state

i think that is actually our folks are recognized in san francisco there was something that crossed any desk i apologize for not bringing this up but a substantive change working closely with the commissioners, i think that the new president of the commission is i want to have some conversation with them given that they have recently made a substantive change so we all know well, maybe so i know we all know what we're talking about it gets dicey when you talk about those courses it gets- it is poison. >> it is poison on our water shed land and exhibit a that lists everything.

>> yeah. i'm no chemist i don't know the intoxication it and in exhibit a you know i'll ask that the commission and/or debbie provide a note that says, you know, this is they're okay from theville apprehensive to move forward i mean, i have concern about the workers as well it is not just environmental piece. >> we're working with the department what else do you want her to do. >> in the last 60 days there is conversation i don't know if this is changed. >> that has changed since - that policy was justy firmed with changes with in 60 days this is consistent but get a letter from the department with this and confirming that is

doable and yosz i don't see a problem to defer this to the next meeting we will set up to 9 next fiscal year for many years. >> great i'll appreciate and get department questions as well thank you very much we'll continue that to the next item next item, please. >> item 9 is approve amendment number 4 to agreement c s - >> can i ask a question i'm sorry didn't you vote to approve it and no, we removed it and continue to the next - >> item 9 approve the item 4 for the 879 and authorize increasing the amendment by $2 million with the term

extension of 3 years i want to note on the agenda it referred to amendment number 3 but actually amendment 40 so the resolution are correct to say it is amendment 4 and not 3. >> okay. is there a motion to approve this amendment as corrected? so moved >> i'll second. >> comments from commissioners public comment on this item. >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? that motion carries next item, please. >> item 10 discussion of the draft 8040 water plan for the city and county of san francisco. >> good afternoon steve richie for water if i can have the slides please i want to cover an

important complex topic with the commission needs to take up if i could have the slides the water map the acronym worked for the san francisco public utilities commission basically provides backward information for the customers and the water system improvement program and relevant agreement with the 2009 with the wholesale customers and various others and the assessment between the balance of the water systems in the drought years and describes the policy questions that needs to be answered which we're referring to as the water map confesses questions and the water supply options to consider and the recommended program but that is a proposed program we're

looking forward to say feedback from the commission today on the issues that we need to deal with so what are we asking of you 3 different discussions for the demonstration of the new description for ceqa review the water map i'll present to the description we need to hear from you the commissioner priorities and requests and what the commission priorities for the supplies going into the background commissioner has an obligation to deliver water to the 12w40e8 customers to the insurance of one and 84 million gallons this is on the 1984 settle one and $84 million per day was established or established that's what it provides to the wholesale customers and the improvement program has delivery

of no more than that 200 and 65 gallons through 2018 it is silent what happens between 2018 the 2008 wsip and the agreement was deferred to 2018 were one should san francisco make santa clara and san jose customers they're not governed the is that you, and, secondly, should the port commission over the supply assurance to meet the customer demand and another piece backward for the requirement for local reservoirs have you know cut spot supply will 3 and a half million gallons per day we need to deal with that overall the demand projects are less than projected and well blow the one and