responsibility for doing assessments and local priorities and developing policies and strategies that address the need and cpac is can fran's child care planning and advisory council. by ordinance and bylaws we have 25 members half appointed by the board of education and half by the board of supervisors and one joint point. point appointment: we have five appointments in each of the categories leaded. members serve up to three year terms. today we're requesting for appointment or reappointment of all individuals and include all groups that i just went over. the appointmentees have diverse backgrounds and range of professional and personal

importance that will allow cpac to fulfill its mission. the slate of nominees was developed with an open call for nominations and careful review of our executive committee and the sfusd chief of early education. so with are bringing forward 12 names so there are eight new appointments. they are vanessa harlin parent consumer, sara kicks-kilday executive director of the san francisco child care providers association who would be is being pointed as a discretionary member. winnie kong a parent and a family child care provider but occupying a consumer seat. lisa lee is a public agency representative. laura moye deputy director i think the

child department youth and families and another representative and joint appointment with the board of supervisors. sheila norman from city college in a discretionary seat. sonia valenzuela for support for families with disabilities is a community representative and ashley williams from san francisco state would be a community representative. those read eight new appointments. there are four refoiments. jane evans a nurse from the department of public health. she would be a public agency arrangement. sharon howell from community care licensing would be a public agency representative. elaine merriweather from united educators a community representative and monica walters executive director of children services is a provider representative so we ask you to approve those appointments and also want to say thank you. we

value our partnership with sfusd and thank you for consideration of these appointments. appointment and i turn it over to you. >> [inaudible] [off mic] so i guess i am going to officially recommend that the board of education of the san francisco unified school district appoint the following people to the child care planning and advisory council cpac and i will say the new appointees again and the repointees. vanessa harlin, winnie kong, sonia valenzuela, ashley williams, lisa lee, laura moye, sheila norman, sara kicks-kilday, and reappointments monica walters, elaine merriweather, jane evans, and sharon howell. >> yes thank you. is elaine merriweather employed with us

still? >> she's a union rep that we're partnered with, yes. >> okay. so is she with the early childhood education or early ed program? >> she's -- you know i don't know. she's not an employee with us but she's a union partner, yeah.y. yeah. >> so the reason i am asking do we have any appointments that have any representation for our early education program at sfusd? you know we're probably the largest provider of early education programs, right, so i am wondering -- >> yes, we do. >> oh you do? who is the person on the list? >> none of the people being reappointed right now, so dr. gibson is actually a current member and then -- >> [inaudible] [off mic]

>> okay. sorry. and going to be pointed but she's appointed by the board of supervisors. >> so nurjy is appointed in this process and by the board of supervisors. >> yes, and we have this very

although in the distant past and i didn't know that responsibility had been designated to a staff person so we were surprised when we got lists of those appointed. what do you mean appointed and we were involved in the discussions and took us a few years to sort it out and what say good way for us to more specifically embrace our responsibility and actually participate more in this appointment process and i am very pleased that we're actually doing that we actually look at bios that we scrutinize the people that we appoint that we make sure we take your recommendations but we have been able to express our opinion who we wanted representative and how we want to be represented and i think this is a good example of our deepening and make highly functioning the partnership arrangements we have with the

city and county whether by choice or law and i am very pleased to see this and this is far better process than anything we had in the past so i thank you all for that thank you very much and of course i am supportive of this. >> commissioner. >> thank you. i just want to -- this looks like such a great team and i am excited to not only work on this side and the city side as well so we're really excited this continues to happen. i worked closely with carla around making sure we are a lot more engaged. for many years just getting as commissioner wynn stated a list and didn't know who they were and never met with our folks. we never knew how we wanted to be represented. i am glad that we are participating in this

very differently and that you know we've had many conversations around who we should be thinking about, what are the -- what's the balance in both diversity and knowledge and skill set and the one thing i would ask and i don't know if this is something you can start making start happen but with our appointments having an opportunity to meet with them or have them report back to us or do something that continues to keep us engaged. we don't want just to be engaged at the point piece. we do points to either of -- appointments to councils and commissions and they represented us well but they're giving feektd on feedback on things coming up so i would like to understand what the cpac is up to and how we can participate in it and even if there are policies that could be supported by the board based on what

they're working on and i would love to see that so really glad we're continuing to participate. you know i know as a school district early ed is critical and important to us and we want to continue to be partners so looking at the new list is exciting and so that would be the only missing piece for me they would love to try to solidify going forward and then we can continue to have really great dialogue so thank you all and our apologies for the late night. you know we all know how it feels to be working all day and sitting in here all night so we appreciate your patience and we're getting through this. thank you. >> commissioner. >> i want to say i think we have the dream team here in san francisco of the right people and the right positions and thank you in advance for the partnerships they know we will continue to deep scpen

strengthen and i wanted note that ms. jerad is one of the fam district. >> thank you and i thank you for the patience and service and those new in the position congratulations. we really believe in the work you're doing and i think we have a tremendous faith in all of you and this is a that wants to be more engaged in the conversation around early education so if there are ways to do that and sometimes a part of our work we don't spend as much time up here that we should and i think we want to know how we can be more engaged and if there things and something that deputy superintendent is prioritizing so involve us and i know you will and do because we want to be your partners here on this side as well, so thank you

and i think we will -- i always have to look around because somebody always has something else to say so we will take a roll call vote on the recommendations. >> thank you. ph. -- (calling roll) seven aye's. >> thank you. [applause] so we still have a ways to go up here. it's early -- >>in [off mic] >> not too much. i have bounce d around and going around can i have a motion and a second on the resolution providing borrowing funds not to exceed $80 million for fiscal year 2016-17 and the issuance sale of 2016-17 trams. >> so moved. >> second.

>> good evening commissioners. i am the chief financial officer. before i read the resolution into the record i would like to introduce david olson from psm, our financial officer who has been waiting patiently all evening to be introduced. i always wanted to draw your attention to i memo they prepared for the district that goes into a little more detail about this transaction and i know you probably have not had a chance to read it but i wanted to make you aware it's in your packet. just briefly this note is scheduled to be sold this coming tuesday on the 20th. we've already gotten some very

good ratings from moody's and s&p, the highest ratings of the obligation which is -- yes, and so that's something really good, and even though our borrowing authorization is for a maximum not to exceed $80 million we work with our outside counsel orrick to look at cash flows and price this note at close to $45 million so with that i will go ahead and read the resolution and if you have any questions mr. olson is available to answer them. so the resolution is to provide for the borrowing of funds in an amount not to exceed $80 million for fiscal year 2016-2017 and the issuance and sale of the san francisco

unified school district 2016-17 tax anticipation revenue notes therefore approving the forms of official notice of sale a note purchase agreement continue be disclosure certificate and preliminary statement for said notes requesting that the treasurer and tax collector of the city and county of san francisco to act as the paying agent for the notes and authorizing other actions in connection therewith. >> thank you. any comments or questions from my colleagues? >> thank you. ms. fewer. >> yes. >> (calling roll). >> thank you. seven aye's.

>> thank you. thank you. thank you for your patience. all right. so i am going to move back to item q. i'm going to take a motion and a second for the suspension of the rules in support of the california health care research and prevention tobacco act of 2016 which i am the author of. can i have a roll call and a suspension for the suspension of the rules. >> moved. >> sorry. roll call -- >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> can i have a motion and a second? >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> sorry. that's what i wanted. >> second. >> thank you. now we can have a roll call. on the suspension of the rules. (calling roll)

seven aye's. >> can i have a motion and a second on the introduction of the resolution? >> so moved. >> second. >> all right. in support of the california health care research and prevention tobacco tax act of 2016 and smoke is the leading preventable death in california and nationally and 90% of smokers begin as teens and millions get hooked every year and half will die on smoking related illness and for every 10% increase in the cost of cigarettes it drops -- [inaudible] and rig retroactive (paused) through

medi-cal to treat smoking diseases and proposition 56 will reduce smoking rates and long-term health care costs and will increase the tax on a pack of cigarettes from california up to $2.87 and equivalent taxes on other tobacco products and two landmar -- ecigs and programs through grants administered by the california department of education research on tobacco related diseases cancer heart and lung disease and increasing

residency programs in medical schools and this act is supported by the state superintendent of public instruction. the american cancer society and lung association and the california medical and dental association and the hospital association and the service employees international union and that the district supports proposition 56. this act of 2016 and urges californians to vote yes in the lives of students. we have one speaker who has been waiting patiently. >> good evening. thank you so much for taking this resolution president haney and good evening to the commissioners and superintendent. i am a pediatrician here in san francisco and have been for the

past 19 years and i am here representing many physicians who aren't here this evening at your meeting both the california medical association as well as the san francisco medical society and also the american academy of pediatrics in california to ask for support of this proposition 56 which 56 tobacco tax act and user fee on tobacco products including ecigarettes containing nicotine and the resolution supported by physicians as well as health care advocate, educators and others the tobacco tax is in the existing programs and research and cure for cancer and other illnesses by cancer and these products. sadly as a physician and my colleagues witness the costly toll everyday in the hospitals and medical offices. cancer and other diseases kill more people than car accidents

murder alcohol and illegal drugs and aids combined and would raise the tobacco tax which is among the lowest in the country to dollars 87 and the heart is temperature. and saves lives by getting people to quit or never start and the only people that pay are those that smoke and as i hope we see dwindling dollars as a result of this because we are successful in creating less smokers in the state and if you don't smoke you don't pay so currently california taxpayers pay 3.5 billion dollars annually to treat these diseases through medi-cal. majority of the revenue generated will go directly into medi-cal which is under funded public program and providing health care to third californians and half of the children are on the program and triple funding for tobacco

prevention which is why i am here before you tonight and also research programs and double the funding for school based tobacco prevention education in classrooms. prop 56 will prevent a new generation of kids from taking up this deadly habit. despite years of progress and the dangers of smoking nearly 17,000 kids get hooked on smoking each year and 1/3 will die from related illnesses. illnesses ecigs are with various flavors and a lot of misinformation about them. teens are price sensitive and this will help them with this. this will triple the taxes and double the school base efforts.

big tobacco pledged to fight this with everything they v they have spent $56 million on it and no special interest has spent more on measures in california since big tobacco and spent 192 in political contributions. you already heard who is supporting and all of the groups previously mentioned and seiu and blue shield and many others and the ask the school board to vote us for prop 56 and save lives and reduce peen and youth smoking. thank you. >> thank you for being here and your leadership. questions, comments from the board?

probably relatively non controversial -- [laughter] >> well, no just to say that some of you know that as a teenager i start the smoking when i was -- >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> when i was i think 13 year's old and i didn't quit until i was almost 30 and it is much to my chagrin and shame they shocked -- that i smoked that long and i hope no one starts and anything we can do to stop anyone from smoking is a good thing so i am strongly supportive. >> great. all right. well i think everything about this has been said. i think this is very much in line with the positions we have taken and the leadership we've had with the district and board on this issue and good for the kids and of course we are happy to support it. roll call vote. >> thank you. (roll call)

that's six ayes. >> thank you. thank you. i appreciate it. so i am going to -- we're jumping around a lot. we don't have too much left. what's that? >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> soon. i'm going to go back to item j because i think i had a little bit of a miscommunication with mr. williams who i see is here. if you want to come up you have two minutes. i appreciate your patience. i didn't know you were still here. i apologize about that so you will have two minutes. hit the mic. >> [inaudible] [off mic]

>> there's a button. >> the reason i am here is that i wanted to talk about klw and i have a lot of problems with k al w because i support ited for many years and i believe in it because i had a special interest in the kind music they broadcast but with the school it doesn't do anything for the student or my federal employees meaning it has no programs about the culture of the schools. there's nothing about drama on k al w. nothing about sports. they don't announce the scores that happen. they don't any reading program that they talk b i have a librarian that i talk to everyday. i am sure she would be great on the radio and so much of the schools that could be on the station and yet

dollar is nothing besides this little meeting which i am support of still having but on the station itself it's complete black out. as an example passed november 11 i went to the vets parade and it moved to fisherman's wharf and the ro tc there, the contingents of the school and the veterans and tourists was there and everybody was except the radio station and that is something radio can do really well but has no concern with what the students do or my colleagues and i really don't understand that policy and i wish that somebody or maybe i don't know how to frame it but maybe they could form a committee of people who are interested in changing the station so it's an inclusive station for the students most of all and for the employees. >> that is a very good point.

thank you. that is a good point. >> thank you. we appreciate it. thank you. >> president haney i want to add that the radio station has made internship opportunities available to our students so there is some sort of behind the scenes support of our district so they do work with our students. >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> thank you. thank you. so i'm going moving back -- i think we have one more item here back in item q. it's the most jumping around i have done here. did i have a motion and second for the suspension of the rules in support of proposition 57. public safety -- okay.

>> [inaudible] [off mic] >> no,. >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> >> i know. i'm good. let's knock this out right now and then i will go back to this. >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> which one are we on? >> 57. >> yeah. because you pulled a couple of items from consent too. okay. we will get right to that. we will knock this one out. >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> susof the rules please. -- (call roll). >> can i a motion on the

resolution. >> so moved. >> all right. i am in support of the proposition 57 the public safety rehabilitation act of 2016 and with the california ballot and help replace the over costly alliance on [inaudible] and focused on rehabilitation for youth offenders and can try someone 14 years of age without review and sentence to adult terms and people were around the age of 18 and young as 14 at the time of the crime and whereas it's critical that children receive different treatment than adults in the system in a way that recognizes the real physical and physiological differences and the capacity of young person to change and mature and research shows placing youth in the adult system return to prison at higher rates than the juvenile

system and face lifelong consequences to followlies felonies on the record and denied education and rehabilitation services while facing exposure to longer sentences and harsher conditions and the jails and prisons populations exploded and increasing the incarcerate rate by five times and which spends billions which takes away critical funds from education and there should be a formal hearing before a judge and full assessment of the person's circumstances and the crime and how they're different from adults before making a decision whether they should be charged as an adult and presumption youth remain in juvenile court and this would say which youth

sent to the adult system and judges rather than prosecutors and this offers an opportunity to end mass incarceration in california and has disproportionality effect on youth and support proposition 57 and encourages the passage in november. questions, concerns, concerns? >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> okay. roll call vote (roll call) seven aye's. >> thank you all. i appreciate that. all right. so item l discussion of other educational issues. there is none tonight. item m consent

calendar resolutions and removed at previous meeting and second reading and none tonight and kmd moved under item g. >> thank you. (calling roll). >> so i pulled -- do i not vote on those? >> [inaudible] >> okay. >> [inaudible] >> yes. >> thank you. (calling roll) seven ayes. >> all right. item o vote on consent calendar resolution suffered for separate consideration under item g. commissioner. >> thank you. so some of you might have seen genie's response to these four particular -- five items. i know you guys think this is kind of -- this is my

thing, right, because it is but it's important to me because it's really about putting forward an item and having the budget to go along with it and i think i've had many -- actually [inaudible] the retroactive [inaudible] have significantly gone down since we have been you know identifying they should be thinking about this stuff ahead of time or is it really necessary to submit late when we could be better prepared so i just want to say a couple of things about this in particular because it's education outside and many of our schools have these programs it seems to me and if you look at the schools they're all schools that have education outside every single year that we should be better prepared to approve them earlier and that the funding commitment for most of these sound like

they're coming from the ptas and not giving the money to the schools after the summer but making sure that is communicated to them that these need to be done ahead of time and that it has the potential of jeopardizing the approval of these dollars going to the consultant so that's the point i really wanted to make on that because it seems like a particular organization in many of our school it is that should know better, and the explanations were actually out of the five were different for three of them, so you know one was school work started and we on summer vacation. other is funding need to be secured and deposited prior and the other one was submitted in june but the code was incorrect so we know it's possible to be submitted in june before school

ends and then these are all starting on august 15 and it's now september. it's our third board meeting so i just -- it just doesn't seem like a good enough excuse to me to be this late. yes thank you. >> so commissioner just to share a little bit of information on that which you might have noticed that some of the k resos for the late meetings looked different than others so to explain that there are some divisions that are

using the automated k reso management system, krms -- i am looking at mr. steel and they're towards -- well, i guess they're interspersed but the k resolutions and we are migrate to this system but we're not finished yet and mr. steel did you want to add anything to that? >> yes the system is primarily done by [inaudible] sfusd now and to school right now and piloting and we should be moving towards that as the year progresses. >> and i believe the department upon of technology is using the online system. >> yes they are. >> thank you and the other item was k31 so this one has exactly the reason that flips me out which is budget allocation

not available in time and then the data services july is july 1 which is in the summer but the program itself seems to be supporting 350 students of spring valley for online s tmap and why did it have -- why are it starting in july when that's during the summer and is this the school wide thing or what is the deal on this? and we've started the program without having funding for it, so you know again i just don't want to get stuck with a program that we have implemented with no budget attached to it so i just thed to understand this one a little better and why did this have to start in july? >> thank you commissioner mendoza -- as superintendent wong makes his way up for explanation on that one you're

observations are rather valid. you will notice array of our soups are given there given the other sites come from different cohorts and you can see they're doing their penance at this late hour. >> at least once a hour. you never know when i will pull them. >> at the minimum the information should be consistent. you're correct. many of the partners were depended on pta funds however we could have anticipated and make the resolutions appear much sooner and many of us are using the electronic management system already. i am one of the approvers already but assistant superintendent wong can offer an explanation on the contract. >> certainly and commissioners i wish i had better answers for you and for this k reso i have to say it's purely oversight

from the principal that i had a conversation with hernandez a her as well and something we wished she would have submitted earlier. >> >> in terms of the reason given i don't think it was a valid reason because the funding was available at that time and she could have submitted the k reso at earlier time and the map program was something that the school community was able to provide access to the families that they can use this program in the summer. that's the reason started on july 1 rather than the first day of school and these are the programs they're using for the last three years and this the one year she forgot to submit it in time.ee there was no really excuses on this part so they're going to have to you know delay the program this

year and resubmit and start the program at a later time. >> okay. what you just said they're not going to be able to do the program now -- but it seems to me it's started. >> it's started and there was a problem which i mentioned to the principal that we couldn't possibly continue without approval from the board. >> right, but the funding has been identified. >> the funding has been identified from title i. >> i'm not asking for this to be pulled and reestablished next year. all i am saying especially if the funding is already identified. my concern is when the funding isn't identified and we commit to contracts prior to funding being identified and if you're saying she didn't submitted it on time. >> correct. >> then i don't want you to not do the program. >> it's great if you approve this but like i said it's a

mistake that the prince pr principal made. >> and the allocation -- i want you to reiterate to the principals let's make sure there is funding in place prior to submitting these things. >> yes. >> because it doesn't bode well for us either when we're doing a lot of different things to raise money or to you know make sure that we're balanced and those types of things so i want to make sure that's happening and the explanation piece -- i don't know if you noticed but i let a few go by because the explanation makes sense or i know that there was a tie up for whatever reason and so if the retro and for those reasons come up. it's when they don't make sense or they don't match that they're going get

pulled so i would just appreciate the iteration to the folks to make sure that that happens. thank you. >> okay. roll call vote. okay. we will take a vote. >> so commissioner mendoza we're voting on k23-27 and k31. is that correct? >> that's correct. >> thank you. (calling roll) seven ayes. >> okay. item p introduction of all proposals and assignment to committee and read into the record the proposal for first reading. board policy 35 15.7 firearms. may i hear a motion

and a second to this resolution. >> move the resolution. >> second. >> all right. this resolution will be referred to the rules committee. there are no board members proposals for first reading tonight. we did item q in full, just not all at the same time and item r board member's are thes. yes, we're getting there. standing committees. i think the only standing committee report that we have is a report from the committee -- ever exciting and fantastic committee of the whole. >> thank you president haney. we had two informational items less week's committee of the whole and we learned we have still work to do but healthy reduction in suspensions and expulsions and everyone is working together to provide a

culture of alternatives so the students stay in the classroom and we're working on strategies to support increased attendance as well. we also had a discussion of the draft request for our request for qualifications for superintendent search firm so the first thing the rfq was posted yesterday and also sent to search firms. secondly once the firms are selected we will plan an initial community session or some form of public meeting once we do select a search firm and three just to point out that we will be interviewing firms on october 6 so more information to follow on the search firm for superintendent search and that is both items from committee of the whole. >> thank you commissioner.

other board members reports? commissioner norton -- >> yes. >> okay. >> so i just wanted to announce that the budget and business services committee is listed in the agenda as taking place on october 5 and now i have a conflict so i'm going to have to cancel that date and we have to look for a new date for the budget committee so committee members i will be in touch you with when to reschedule. >> thank you. commissioner. >> i have two things. i wanted to announce the rules committee which is -- will take place on monday the 19th, this coming monday at 430 in the afternoon. that's worth repeating because it's an odd time so 430 in the afternoon and and rules committee

will be in this room and upcoming report of what the governor signed of the bills at that time or veeod and no updates on positions or legislative proposals but some of the policies we're reviewing periodically will come before the board and if i may want to recognize one thing and i don't know if you read in the pawrp today and ucsf award wins a prestigious awards (reading) (paused) we should all be

prowtd of this but his commitment to science and education found a project in which students and researchers and faculty volunteered to work with san francisco public school teachers to stimulate interest in science and now the partnership is a full department at the university and linked to the san francisco unified school district. he is now a professor emeritus and travels to indonesia and special science envoa. in 2014 he was awarded

the national award of science and much of the commitment to improve came in the 80's when his wife was on the san francisco pta and his kids were in school and she said how little science they were getting and the equipment to show them how to do science and instead of memorizing the words and here we had the equipment that the federal government paid for and scientists didn't need and finished their research and we couldn't sell it without being arrested and maybe the government wouldn't mind to transferring to to the school district and have been doing it ever since and my congratulations to dr. bruce alberts and the work for the san francisco unified school district over the years from which thousands of our students have benefited. thank you. >> thank you. commissioner. >> thank you very much. the

first ad hoc community on student assignment meetings for the school year is wednesday september 21 at 6:00 p.m. and we will not be proposing a major changes to the student assignment system this year, this coming year. we're intending to use the year as a time to listen to feedback to sort of tup some of the biggest questions around the student assignment process and invite the public stakeholders to come to our meetings which will be announced in advance and hope folks can join us. i just have one additional community announcement. i want to congratulate the balboa high school cheer leading team that was selected from nationwide competition to travel to london as part of the new year's day

parade in 2017 and they do have a go fund me campaign going on because it's a very expensive proposition but i want to recognize their achievement in being selected for that honor. >> thank you. commissioner. >> thank you. so two things. the building and grand grounds is meeting on the third monday this month and the 19th and not the following week. >> >> we're starting at six and i know rules and policy is starting at 430 -- >> [inaudible] [off mic] >> okay. are you guys going to be done by six? >> we should be done by that time. it's not a long agenda. >> great. and we're having the ad hoc joint school committee on the 28th and discussing number of things there and just one announcement. i just wanted to thank everyone who came out for the september

1 announcement for sales force and oakland unified school district and funding as a new partner so we got another $6 million and oakland unified school district got two and a half million dollars so they're starting a leadership initiative in the middle schools as well so we're partnering with them to help with the implementation of that but we had many of our folks out in these amazing computer science t-shirts and so we're well represented even though we're in the east bay and thank the staff in particular, melissa dodd and jim ryan and the team for being so supportive and pushing this worked for. what started off -- >> [inaudible] >> and chris -- i'm sorry. . what started off getting devices into our kids' hands is started to build the fownchdz for math

and computer science and the eighth grade math scores are starting to show positive outcomes, not only because of this but the layered work we're doing and this has been an incredible tool for us and thank you to sales force and the entire team and all of the midschoolers getting this wonderful opportunity. >> commissioner. >> just an announcement and i promise you don't want to miss the ad hoc community on personnel matters and labor relations at 6:00 p.m. >> sounds like fun. >> it is always fun -- [inaudible] any other announcements from board members? nope. okay. all right. item s other informational items, none.

item tnrmal adjournment. close session. the board will go into closed session and i call a

item v -- i now resume the regular board meeting. report of close session actions from the september meeting of september 13, 2016 and voted seven ayes and approved the contract of program administrator and one supervisor and case numberace listed and seven ayes give the authority for the district to pay up to the stipulated amount. report of close session items of september 13, 2016 and vote of seven ayes and approved of krfert of one program administrator and one chief and one rim chief and in the case of case no. 2016070173 by the board by vote of seven ayes to pay the amount as stip laitded and kj

versus the sfusd case no. 2016070307 and pay up to the stipulated amount. committee is now adjourned.

>> morning everybody welcome to the budget and finance committee meeting for wednesday, september 14, 2016, my name is mark farrell chairing the committee joined by supervisor katie tang and supervisor norman yee and want to thank the clerk clerk victor young and sfgovtv members for covering this meeting just lost the names

please silence any devices that may sound off during the proceedings. items acted upon today will appear on the september 20th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. >> call item one. >> wages for the loading and unloading of materials products for special events on city properties for city vehicles so for to you purpose. >> we have supervisor wiener officer who is the sponsor. >> good afternoon supervisor farrell and i'm from supervisor wiener's office before you is legislation that will help to insure the folks behind the scenes making the events the success those are folks that upload tables and equipment and the likes and we want to make sure their do paid a fair living wage while doing that work the board of supervisors has been consistent with the support for prevailing legislation insuring

the work done on city permits it held to a higher standard with a fair living wage that supports families with a quality of life we have worked on this protective for a year and thank you to the local agency formation commission and the rec and park department, the mta and the port for theirs helpful feedback has we develop this proposal before the committee is legislation that focuses on park property and casts a wider net in terms of the types of events for the loading and unloading of vehicles many will apply since this item was agendized we've been can with sfrrlz with labor and organizers and event organizers to tailor the legislation to insure wear striking the right balance between supporting our workers and insuring war not causing a financial burden on the

capitalized events i'll request the committee entertain a motion to go make a serious even if amendments i'm concerned distributed you should have if flouven you that representative an expansion of the prevailing wage requirement with respect to geography that makes that apply 120ir9 and festivity limiting the kinds of events covered we're focusing on this on the fence that have a high-level of production i have been informed by the city attorney's office those amendments are substantive the item needs to be continued for one week briefly the amendments are as follows: as i mentioned we will expand the prevailing wage requirement for the driving loading and uploading of commercial vehicles to all city properties not just rec and park and that was at the request of the rec and park department

and then but at the same time as i mentioned before as a way to measure proxy to look at the larger events with more access to capital the this new requirement would apply only if the event otherwise already triggers other prevailing wage provisions mainly the theatre california workers like putting you think large stamps and stages and things like that or if it triggers the prevailing wage that is tied to trade shows and so and all of the exemptions that are in those prevailing wage sections apply as well as the exemptions in the orientals before you that are specific to this so to think about it the prevailing wage requirement is for events on city property only those events fib already trigger

under existing law prevailing wage requirements has to do with with production of those events and so i want to thank the committee for considering this item today and for elimination considering the amendments we have a futile people with comments. >> thank you, mr. powers. >> supervisor yee. >> i was looking at through it and thinking which department and how would they actually escalate or monitor this agency precumbersome. >> an easy way to do this. >> the way it works for the board of supervisors to pass the amendments establishing the prevailing wage for the type of work this is what is before you today should the board pass this measure or have in prevailing wage requirements the next step

the office of labor & standards enforcement works with the civil service to do a survey to establish the types of work in san francisco they come up with a number a dollar amount that dollars amount comes back to the board of supervisors and gets supposed to be between one and 20 days or 4 months the board to approve that rate so that is what this legislation does what every other piece of legislation does as well. >> i guess i understand that piece of it and maybe this could be the answer could be saved for next week if you don't have an answer once that's established and then the city vendor that works for the city drives some stuff in how does one know when to trigger the prevailing wage

for them and when do you come to ours and monitor that? >> i see so i apologize for this introduce. >> i don't want- it's one of the questions i'm curious will come, answered next week this ordinance requires every permitted 24 the city issues has language specifically if you do xyz in this case loading and unloading for the types of event for the coverage you're required to pay the prevailing wage for this work and so long as our paying as a permit i didn't and paying that dollar amount established by the board if you - basically, that's essentially you have the option to work with union labor would be prevailing

wage or you could hire non-union as long as our paying that but the primary has the instructions how to what the rate will be or required to pay the rate the loading and unloading it is concise for the driving question we've been talking with o lc the thought around how to establish a rate for driving politically happens through legislation. >> and i'm happy to come back with 0 more information next week. >> that's appreciated. >> with that, mr. rose, can we go to your report. for item one please. >> yes. mr. chairman, and members of the committee. on page 4 of our report we state that although the proposed ordinance can increase the wages for that special events on city property unknown as to whether or not those increased costs

show a special events will reduce the special events on city property and consecutively reduce the franchise we consider this a matter to the board of supervisors. >> colleagues, any questions moving on to public comment anyone wish to comment on item number one. >> please come forward everyone has two minutes. >> thank you. good morning. i'm joseph a secretary treasurer of local 2785 in san francisco i want to kind of give a brief history how to all start i was appointed secretary of treasury in 2012 and driving to the city and. >> classic party rentals holding out chairs in front of the city hall and are normally we do a lot of

that work and so i pulled over and asked the employees how much they were getting paid and i was surprised and shocked to hear how far blow they were compared to what the teamsters get paid to do the similar work in a city it is known to be in favor of labor and the high cost of living in the city he was taken back but how much they were getting paid another story that i want to stare share with the committee an event on pier 27 that port was dedicated to the union leader and we we're not getting work out of public school pier we went into that pier and found

yet another company who was paying their employees substantially below the prevailing wage we're proposing this to the one of the things there was not an ordinance for loading and unloading there was an ordinance for the electricals work an ordinance for setting up all the different booths for the trade show but not an ordinance for loading and unloading that's what started three and four on that a little bit over a.m. a year ago that's why i'm here today thank you very much. >> next speaker, please. >> good morning, committee members i'm with the teamsters we've spent the last year and a half working on this piece of legislation just to address supervisor yee some of your comments we're not recreating the wheel we actually tied this

to mirror what the integral association technical and stage engineers have done those special events will be the same special events they're paid prevailing wage it covers different he it materials and has a slightly different focuses we met that multiple agencies san francisco go rec and park and sfmta, ocii anywhere in the city it will have a special event associated with that a permit associated with it we sat down sat down to talk about this through the items of these supervisor wiener's office we've had lots of conversations that with anyone that is impacted and the promoters and come to a protected consensus this is the least amount of impact and has a

positive impact on workers, wages and working health conditions in terms of work that is being done thank you for your consideration. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good morning, supervisors my name is bill i'm a business representative for the teamsters locals 2785 in addition to the stagehands another local that has a prevailing wage that we work with hand in hand with and in addition to the wages that we offer we offer general benefit package for retirement and medical for our members and thank you for supporting this and it is a going to level the playing field for the teamsters and another labor unions get and the teamsters are cut out and we want to emphasize

the safety aspect we have a training trust fund how to loading and unloading trucks and train them on the operation of all support of forklifts all sizes in those special events thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm tefrns with a business agent with local i'll be brief i think this is a good measure it level the playing field for everyone who is expensive to live in san francisco and a good quality wage is essential to have a good quality lifestyle thank you very much. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm terry born and raised san francisco i worked here in san francisco for 3 two years and we are in support of 24 measure it has to do with with the

levels the playing field you have companies it come into san francisco and pay half of what the union contracts do they may get the bid based on that you have people you don't know what the training is and if they know the issues and know how to do the work and people sitting in the hiring hall ready to go out there and go do the job about levels the playing field i live in district 7 been born and raised here and we need the last few years the board of supervisors has been very pro-active in bringing wages up whenever they poeblt can that's all this does this means that employers have to come in and pay a certain rate agreed upon

rate so it is equal thanks. >> thank you very much. >> next speaker, please. >> morning supervisors business rep with teamsters local 2785 here to support this ordinance we believe this ordinance will create a level the playing field when it comes to wages at that time when it is bernie madoff more difficult to remain living in the city we firmly believe that creating fair living wages will help folks to remain living in the great city thank you. >> thanks very much anyone wish to comment on item number one seeing none, public comment is closed. supervisor yee. >> i see pat is here is it possible to ask him questions. >> sure. >> my line of question was to be supportive of this don't get me wrong part of it what i

looked at the as well, people will be supportive of this can we enforce this the thing that triggers the driving part of it you know how do we will your office enforce it we make sure that those companies that are doing this actually going to pay those people thank you, supervisor the prevailing wage a team within the law enforcement focuses on those policies specifically most prevailing wage are established though the industrial residents those san francisco almost we need san francisco to establish prevailing wages that were specifically to special events and private entities doing contract work or engaging in a manner that includes the list through a legislative digest for the enforcement our office has

the benefit of leveraging the city contractors so if there is a violation we vend those special events so is not terribly different from superbowl and other events associated with superbowl there are prevailing wages and america's cup requirements it is more difficult like the non-restricted prevailing wages we'll pursue employers and interview employees onsite to insure they're receiving the prevailing rate or no sort of labor violations under san francisco law frequently it is complaint driven not a certified presidential but actively respond to complaint with information out there the city vendor as the speakers noted this is - this prevailing wage will pass will go into contract

documents for any special events any say group or event promoterer knows those rates apply subcontractors and the subcontractors will work with the office to insure that. >> thank you for that explanation. >> colleagues questions or comments so we have a number of amendments into supervisor wiener office we'll have to continue this they are substantive can i entertain a motion to anticipate accept. >> motion by sdmaun and seconded by can we take that without objection? and continue item number one for the next budget & finance committee meeting >> as amended nor one week. >> motion by supervisor tang

without objection. >> with that mr. clerk item 2. >> retrofitting arthur's the city attorney to accept and expend at 13 thousand for a term of april 2020 through 2018. >> thank you we have the district attorney's office office. >> thank you from the district attorney's office we like to ask, ask for your support for the 13 thousand standford university is offering the criminal justice and analyzing the sets to the droofz any enhance its case of processing and help to make the transparency and accountability to community members happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you. okay thank you very much colleagues, any questions. >> okay open up for public comment anyone wish to comment on item number item 2 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> so move it out with a

positive recommendation. >> mothsz by supervisor yee and seconded by supervisor tang. >> item 3. >> resolution authorizing the financing to be undertaken by the office of the small business commission plaza and parking corporation on the on behalf of not to exceed $12.5 million and approving the authorization of the execution of documents remarkably necessary for such financing. >> okay. thank you we video kate from rec and park here. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm kate with rec and park and i'm here this morning to ask for your approval of a 12 and a half mental illness loan for the pretty much of the plaza corporation to fund much needed improvements to the parking garage as you may know poshth is owned and the net revenue for the departments jean fund budget rec

and park received one $.12 million for the parking garage last year in 2011 a new approved lease with the nonprofit for the parking corporations for management and operation of the garage the lease anticipated that p t pc with approvals from the city will renovate the parking garage to address the maintenance and portsmouth opened no 1961 and not received any significant improvements or renovation in the last 55 years this proposed project includes relocation of staff areas improvements to pedestrian circulation, lighting mechanical and lighting and plaguing you got and repairs to concrete upgrading a fire system and a new revenue system and

elevators to fined this that concludes my report. corporation has secured a loan up to 12 and a half million dollars from first republic bank the city sorry for the lease between the city and corporation the board of supervisors must approve the financing including the loan and a revenue commitment from the letter from the city under the irs the city must approve the corporation and approve revised articles and correspondence of bylaws the loan from first republic has a thirty year term with a 3.3 interest rate the loan is structured as interest only during construction and converts to think amortized loan amazing thirty years in the closing date under the terms of the loan the city provides a commitment letter to first republic

pledging the garage there will be a revenue producing event and the gross revenue will first pay that service the letter also stipulates that subject to appropriation by the mayor and the board the city will cover the garage debt service should the garage not function under some type of disaster or earthquake or something like that annual debt service is steshlgd 6 hundred thoughts a cash naturals in your packet and attached to the budget analyst report demonstrates the garage funded annual operating expenses fund a one million loan pay that service and confronting meet the deck radio of 5.2 to one the rec and park department has approved

both the concept design as well as the proposed fifrnsz for this project i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> colleagues any questions. >> supervisor tang. >> i can't wait for the improvements to that concludes my report. parking garage given i go there often i was want to know if rec and park has a master plan in terms of all of its parking garages it might lease out or just in general long term plan for those improvements or kind of comes up one by one. >> so represent reply r rec and park owns 4 parking garages that concludes my report. it has struck out on its own inform with the particular financing package the other 3 garages are under the purview of the mta they have a plan for sxaments to garcia including rec

and park garages and have approved revenue bonds to do the work that needs to be done in the garages. >> i think it was mentioned potentially in the budget analyst report that even though sfmta has the ability to issue revenue bonds this particular private plan was more attractive. >> it is a better deal yeah. >> okay supervisor yee. >> quick comment i'm glad this is happening i remember prior to 1961 when it wasn't a garage only a part of grass as a kid we love to roll on the thing and so experienced to this garage as a

kid. >> okay thanks mr. rose, can we go to your report. >> yes. mr. chairman, and members of the committee on page 8 of our report we note that the annual debt service is estimated at $684,000 or total debt service $20 million plus including the privilege of 12.5 mental illness and interest we also note that the based on an attachment on page 10 of our report provided by rec and park cash flee analysis projects the annual income are during the first 10 years of a thirty year are from a low even if approximately $4 million plus in 2018 to a hyphae report on the bottom of page 8 not result in a liability to the city's general fund we recommend you approve

this. >> thank you, mr. rose anyone wish to comment on item number item 3? >> morning supervisors i'm terry lee i'm president of the plaza corporation board of directors and worked in the community i've been around as long as supervisor yee and also have been on the board a long time it was great that katie mentioned that the board of directors sought out the financing and did the renovation it goes back to 1950s and the supporting plaza was formed by members of the community they fined financing with security pacific bank and hired the engineers and architects to

design the garage with the opposition from the city there are two things that were left out of the benefits would be number one is we'll finally have a gate that closes the garage go since 1960 the garage is constantly open 24/7 because we have no gate to close the front of the garage and the other item there are hidden areas behind the walls and can open up and add 16 or 17 add parking spaces for the garage you know, we have valet parking 7 days a week between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. that allows us to reach over 100 percent capacity in the garage and maximize the return for not only rec and park department but for the entire city thank you for considering

this and la jolla hard working in the community for to put that together. >> anyone wish to comment on item number item 3 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> all right. i'll make a motion to send forth i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> >> okay motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor yee without objection. >> item 4. >> resolution approving and authorizing the acquisition of one temporary easement and one permanent easements for the t f e approximately 23 thousand to be used by the city under the water system improvement progress for r program for the modification for the section is maintenance repair and replacement through the the scheduled maintenance and emergency repairs for the project known as the ground water storage and project.

>> thank you very much. >> good morning chair farrell and members of the budget & finance committee i'm bryan manager for the sfpuc and seeking our approval to purchase two easements for the sfpuc go regional ground water storage one thousand plus briefly the project has 6 ground water location for used during dry weather years in normal years the wells will be allowed to be recharged and the sfpuc will provide hetch hetchy waters those wells connect to san bruno this is the last major project in the water system improvement program the project requires two easements of tear construction easements and sub surface along the backside that is owned by l

f p the acquisition is environment for the project i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thank you for your consideration. >> thank you colleagues in any sequesters. >> no budget analyst report anyone wish to comment on item number seeing none, public comment is closed. colleagues, can we >> i mansion a i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor yee and seconded by commissioner tang without objection madam clerk call item number 5. >> resolution approving the frifkt for the including of the contract approximately 15 mental illness plus over the october 1st, 2018, and okay. thank you very much supervisors good morning steve lee with sfmta the resolution before you is requesting the

proposal to sxers the last option of the our agreement with p r o it for a progressing and there not to exceed amount to cover this extension the sfmta released a request for proposal in july for a new vendors selection the proposal will be reviewed in november 2014 and we and anticipate the new vendor in place in 2017 the current agreement losses allows for the staffing tore terminate the agreement or extension for convenience we concur with the budget analyst to amend not to exceed amount of $62.7 million and i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> okay colleagues questions or comments? okay commissioner tang >> thank you so i just wanted to get into a little bit of the details what

was entailed in the rfp i know that there was a consultant that conducted some research on industry practices and if you could elaborate on some of those it is worthy he mevengs incorporating additional practices or technology into our future contract. >> so the current system has been in place since 1998 almost 20 years now through the process of the survey by consultants and resources found there is very little standardstion throughout the industry and some of the things in terms of best practices a more flexible system to generate reports and more stable system so the system didn't crash or cause us problems for the shareholders within the agencies a more intuitive user interface

easier to use and a system that is able to integrate with the contracts and pro contracts and just a better system. >> i know there was also mentioned you know being able to better use the smart phone tablets or other devices and so forth and, of course, this contract you said that you're hoping for the new vendor in place in 2017 gives us time from my understanding if there is a vendor to transition into and incorporate. >> if a new vendor is selected a new system a lot of training and during the negotiation process we'll run a system to make sure their system works and taking a section of the city and running life certifications and

looking at a process for enforcement that can be tablets so we are looking that. >> uh-huh. and lastly given the changes that your incorporating to hopefully help the new contract what would you say the everyday impact; right? so, i mean i know that people don't like receiving certifications iowa radio the real impact. >> for the agency it is better interface because it impacts a variety of our organization starting with customer service center and enforcement and hearings,th accounting so to generate reports better user

interface so internally i'll say extraordinarily some of the things we're looking for a realtime citation posted the way it works today parking control officer will dock the device at the end of the day and all the sized are uploaded and notice are generated and fast forward immediately when the citation is issued they can pay it online. >> does that gang the appeals as well. >> possibly it may i'm not sure about that. >> all right. thank you. >> supervisor yee. >> okay mr. rose, can we go to your report. yesdz on page 17 summarized in

table 3 i should say page 16 and summarizing table 3 on that page the sfmta projections expending the total of 76 mental illness plus through october 21st of 2018, however, the proposed resolution requests the extension not to exceed $77 million plus so as shown in table 3 the resolution should be amended to reduce the total not to exceed amount to that 7677 plus we state that think page 17 our recommendation to amend we recommend you amend the proposed to reduce the not to exceed agreement by one million dollars plus from $77 million plus to $76 million plus this amendment will authors the request of the fifth amendment by two years

from in love first 2016 through october 21st, 2018, and increase the agreement 20e89 not to exceed amount by $14 million plus from $62 million plus to a total not to exceed amount of $76 million plus and we recommend you, you approve as recommended. >> okay. thank you very much mr. richie colleagues questions or comments moving on to public comment anyone wish to comment on item number 4 seeing none, public comment is closed. >> all right. i'll that make a motion to accept the amendments recommended by the analyst and amended and i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> okay motion by supervisor tang and can we take that without objection? >> item 6 through 8 together and item 6 resolution providing for the issuance of not to exceed $310 million aggregation

for principle amounts to the tax exempt go bond and number 7 authorizing not to exceed $77 million aggregate principle amount of the city and county of san francisco principle go bond series 2016 f and item 8 appropriation of $77 million for the go bond 20166 mayor's office of housing and community development and saving those funds on the pending sales of the bones. >> we have kate hartley who is in the chafrmgz as often as we are. >> good morning. >> good morning, supervisors we're happy to be here to seek your approval for the issuance of first trench of the 2015 go bond housing bonds the amount is 77 million for the first trench we'll be spending $75 million on

actual housing brick-and-mortar the new construction or is purchasing of housing and reservoirs and issuance costs included in the 77 million as you recall we created 4 categories for the $310 million total housing bond when was passed by the voter in november we got public housing investment and locating housing and investment as well as a special category for investment in the mission neighborhood and middle-class housing as well we identified mr. starr needs we wanted to address with this money and that is to reserve some of the most vulnerable resident in san francisco and then we identified the uses of those funds for the low income category as well as the mission neighborhood category and seek to build new construction and we will be

doing so soon i hope we issued a request for a proposal and are ready to announce the project that can move forward in addition in this category we have additional funning for our small program that is a acquisition of rent-controlled properties to preserve the affordability in the units and stop the ada control we will be jump staring the reasons work on potrero two projects that are in desperate need and out there for 8 years we're excited to be breaking ground on those projects this year and finally middle-income housing didn't have stated or federal loan we have a loan program to expand our next door program and provide new opportunities for

middle-income units across the city and with the next door program that will be used in conjunction with our expanded down payment program and other programs we're working with the san francisco unified to help teachers get into affordable housing and just wanted to note that housing generally obligation bonds are different unlike an infrastructure project the city contracts, directly with the contractor we get loans to contractor who leverage those funds to get additional state and federal funding the construction work is actually procured by the developers you're going our loans pursuant to the city's procurement rules we follow we have in your

packages the use of funds for the $310 million in the categories i'm concerned talked about and well on our way we issued a request for proposals for the next. >> sorry ms. kately for the power point presentation do you have copies. >> i have a hardcopy. >> sorry we'll follow along on this. >> sorry about that so we issued a request for proposals for construction of new units on april 20th we've golden got the responses on july 11th and will be announcing the selected development teams shortly had nor responses than money to fund it but all the responses are great and the proposed uses were spread across the city for seniors, homeless

households and protecting households included great community benefits we are excited again moving forward on those with respect to public housing we'll have our first great britain on a public housing replacement site at the potrero this year and second to none daily will follow next year for tax credits in march those funds will allow to happen and create the city development work for subsequent phase and finally we've expanded our downtown assistance program to reach for households as well as is refund our kitchen next door program we're happy to say the first expansion the family that used the loan program was petri so it is great they're very excited about the site and we'll also be putting that middle-income money into

the production of new units the first site of that is our seawall project on 88 broadway that will have 15 percent of the family units slated up to one and 20 percent of area income oh, in addition certainly we'll be you're going in the next issuance will be voting money for the production of teacher housing going if the tax accurate medium area income and working with the school district on that so we will have a bond sale assuming your approval at boards approval in october and post the bonds in november and the parties will get going in fact, we've already for the down payment loan

assistance program we've started the program and video a reimbursement program for pay back and back before you many times on all the projects as you may know we do extensive outreach a loan committee that approves our loans for the public and also report, of course, to the go bond oversight committee so a lot of accountability so i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> oh, commissioner keane. >> this is so exciting to see something on the ballot and we're about to issue bonds and appropriate the funding for that much needed housing 90 in san francisco one of the things we've obviously heard a lot about how we help our teachers stay in san francisco so i know that again, you have the teacher

next door program i wonder if you can can you talk about that how your work with mohcd and sfmta how you're working together to support the teachers living in san francisco. >> great as you said a lot of work towards teacher housing in the last couple of years and many years before that there were in the past some obstacles and two main obstacles one was fair housing if you used federal or state funds it is hard to restrict housing to a certain occupation and the other it funding as i understand we're able to leverage your money with tax credits but householders

above the ami medium area income for us to pay the cost of construction is really, really expensive a couple of things happened in the last year one there is legislation pending on the governor's desk we firmly believe that will be signed shortly that allows skrukts to use their surplus go improvements for surplus housing and identifies the teacher housing as a state priority and a special state program that opposite side much the door for us to use the low income tax credits a lot of the issues will go away and with those bond funds we can pay that extra increment for the protecting housing more money available working with the unified school

district they have surplus sites around the city and ready to fund the gap with mohcd with ios funds and other funds we have and so we hope to get hundred units of affordable housing online in the next couple of years and get started soon so we want to replicate that modeled and through other measures whether working with dispensaries with inclusionary obligations and mixed income opportunities we can keep that going. >> those are great in terms of the state law that will be signed been little governor is that only for teachers or apply to other you know paraprofessionals. >> we specifically put - you

know we worked on that legislation to make sure we can service paraprofessional employees of the unified school district as well because the income ranges include people that are having incomes below 60 and 50 percent of medium area income that makes them eligible for tax credits and other higher paid employees for teacher that don't qualify for tax credits. >> thank you, again, for thank you for all your hard work we'll continue to have more detailed conversations with our department on all the projects in the cue and thank you for all you do and trying to find creative solutions to serve people from all walks of life and incomes. >> supervisor yee and in regards to the extended

definition of educators one thing that gets left out in the discussion are people that work in the education field within the school district i don't know if that was included in the language. >> we've thought to include the board itself range of income levels we could and see as we work with the school district we will be refining the, eligibility requirements so any school district employee should be eligible for this housing but that's you know we have to get the governor's signature and move forward those are again, we sought to reach the broadest number of educators that we could. >> thank you. >> okay

colleagues, any further questions mr. rose, can we go to your report. for item. >> my colleagues will be geneva a presentation. >> sorry about that. >> i'll invite from the controller's office to briefly go through the details of the financing as ms. hartley said this is the first sale from the november 2015 authorization the voters thooshsz up to $310 million in go bond to fund capital improvement for vulnerable populations and this for sale is not to exceed $77 million before yours two resolutions arthur's the issuance of up to

$310 million the bonds for this program approving the first sale up to $77 million as well as the closure documents and authorizing the controls to update the documents as necessary to include the latest financial information to the city and sdabd it to the public for bonds and also before you a appropriation for the bond fund with the project line items and oversight as well as the reserve for market fluctuations between now and the sale the cumulative tax rate for the bonds is based on our sale projections and an annual debt services of $5.5 million is estimated to be approximately $2.66 for one homicide dollars based on the last certificate

this is an impact of $15 plus for the $600,000 home the city maintains a go bonds to maintain the tax rated at or below the 2006 levels i can guarantee this meets the projected tax rates this will stay below the 2006 rate we have a debt limit on the go bond and the rates the current debt radio by 0.9 to 99 percent that is below the rate if you have any more questions i'll be i'll be happy to answer any questions you may have. >> colleagues any questions. >> okay mr. rose.

>> yes. mr. chairman, and members of the committee the controller's office has just presented all of the pertinent information on pages 22 and 23 of our report i have nothing else to add and recommend that you approve the proposed resolutions and ordinance. >> thank you, mr. rose. >> colleagues, any further questions for the staff or budget analyst and move on to public comment anyone wish to comment on item number items 6, 7 or 8 all right. >> seeing none, public comment is closed. >> just wanted to make sure supervisor yee and will be 3 items 6, 7 and 8 i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> >> okay. a motion by sdpooe and seconded by supervisor tang without objection madam clerk call item 9. >> item 9 resolution authorizing the ordinance sale and delivery of multi family

revenue bonds not to exceed $52 million plus for the ferns of the construction of a one 43 multi family residential known as mission bay boulevard north and we have the mayor's office of housing and community development to speak on this item. >> good morning, supervisors. i'm pamela a development specialist in the mayor's office of housing and community development and this authorized the ordinance of bonds to pay for the relation of mission bay boulevard as long as this is the sponsor and will serve as owner and wells fargo will serve as a limited partner and tax craigslist investor and the lenders and bond purchaser when completed mission bay south block 58 will be a hundred and

48 unite of single-family homes with 53 one bedroom 46 two bedrooms and three bedrooms one will be a managers units and articulated to have folks aribnb 61 thousand for a family of 4 and also there will be 29 units aside for the chronologically homeless families mission bay is within of the 3 former redevelopment areas to move forward by the states finance department this is conduit financing not requiring the city's responsibility but were issuing the bond in the next few weeks and construction we set mid 2018 and here with me is sponsor represent in tndc and presenting our support and look forward to

the grand opposite any questions. >> colleagues questions or comments? >> okay. seeing none anyone wish to comment on item number item number 9 public comment is closed. >> okay i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> motion by supervisor tang and seconded by supervisor yee without objection madam clerk call item number ten and resolution authorizing the lease of approximately 17 thousand square feet at the 1360 mission street with mission street for a 4-year term through 2017 with one year option to extend for a total basis most of $760,000 thank you very much. we have our day and night here. >> good morning chair farrell supervisor tang and supervisor yee. >> my name is a robert watcng